Epstein - The Scumbaggery Goes Deep

48,299 Views | 421 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by Florda_mike
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YoakDaddy said:

PartyBear said:

I have a feeling Epstein will be letting you know something soon. He is going to squeal like a piglet this time. The public corruption unit has the new cases which is interesting. I don't know if Epstein bribes Acosta to get his sweet heart deal. Not sure if Starr was in on anything like that if it occurred. Needless to say this is going to be very interesting if Putin doesn't arrange for his suicide, or choking on a sandwich or Trump doesn't pardon him real soon or something.

I'd prognosticate that Epstein ratted out a bunch of politicians to the FBI in exchange for easier sentence....FBI went old school Hoover and got dirt in case it's needed later. I guess we'll find out.


I don't think so. To not be complicated about it but there would be something on the record filed requesting a reduced sentence if that was the case. Likewise his last sentence would not be controversial among people in the profession including even other DOJ prosecutors.
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

YoakDaddy said:

PartyBear said:

I have a feeling Epstein will be letting you know something soon. He is going to squeal like a piglet this time. The public corruption unit has the new cases which is interesting. I don't know if Epstein bribes Acosta to get his sweet heart deal. Not sure if Starr was in on anything like that if it occurred. Needless to say this is going to be very interesting if Putin doesn't arrange for his suicide, or choking on a sandwich or Trump doesn't pardon him real soon or something.

I'd prognosticate that Epstein ratted out a bunch of politicians to the FBI in exchange for easier sentence....FBI went old school Hoover and got dirt in case it's needed later. I guess we'll find out.


I don't think so. To not be complicated about it but there would be something on the record filed requesting a reduced sentence if that was the case.

Don't know, but running a pedo ring with flights is something the govt would not want in the record if reduced sentence for that scumbaggery was exchanged for information on politicians who got "massages". The public outcry would be enormous. Heck, if you gauge the twitter, this is one issue that has conservatives and liberals agreeing.
BrooksBearLives
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Epstein cooperated with the FBI in the Bear Stearns Investigation. In exchange, the feds backed off on the pedo case.
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
Malbec
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
Yeah, I noticed that the quote doesn't say, 'And he likes younger women,' or 'I have seen him with beautiful, younger women.' "It has been said...," sounds kind of like, 'I heard through the grapevine that...,' or 'I've heard rumors that...' Given Trumps braggart nature, that doesn't sound very participatory.
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The new case is regarding abusing girls at his Manhattan Mansion. The tropical island case is the one he got an strange light sentence on from Acosta. I suppose there can be new cases if new victims are found or come forward regarding the south Florida and private island situation. But that isn't what the SDNY has.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump terminated his association with the flesh peddler long before he ran for president.

Regardless let's put partisanship aside for once and see where the evidence leads .
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jeff Epstein's pimp/girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell...



Why would the Clinton's want her attending Chelsea's wedding? This was POST-CONVICTION for Epstein: 33,000 acid washed emails about "weddings" ...and yoga tho
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dude is going to get 5 years for a proffer/cooperation agreement and giving up names.

Watch.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Dude is going to get 5 years for a proffer/cooperation agreement and giving up names.

Watch.
He had better have some pretty good full-time security or I could see him getting "suicided".
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Dude is going to get 5 years for a proffer/cooperation agreement and giving up names.

Watch.
He had better have some pretty good full-time security or I could see him getting "suicided".
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sure if he has done that, they will play hard ball with him. Such as saying you have a statutory minimum of 10 years your guideline is higher than that and you will do more than 10 if you go to trial. Cooperate and if it leads to enough to prosecute you will get a break but no guarantees at this time as to how much. The bottom line here is they indict when they have a solid case and are ready. That means they already have other people and pretty much know what he knows, what he has to say may just be icing on the cake or enough to make some shakey cases strong. Obviously if the public corruption division has it, there must be some current public officials involved in some way as either Johns or part of the actual trafficking crime.
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Dude is going to get 5 years for a proffer/cooperation agreement and giving up names.

Watch.
He had better have some pretty good full-time security or I could see him getting "suicided".


Looks like there's gonna be a massive public shaming....and arrests.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep and some creepy findings:

riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Comey's daughter is on the case you know they are going to make a deal w/ him to give up something on Trump whether it's true or not. The timing of this is interesting a few weeks before IG report is coming out and Mueller testifying.

Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Comey JR is a bit Player. She may provide leaks, but that's it.
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Possibly. My $$$ is on Trump playing this to discredit Mueller before his testimony since it's proven that Trump wasn't closely connected to Epstein (cooperated with Miami investigation, kicked him out of club, and the backhanded-likes them younger comment) and the light sentence out of Miami had executive leadership level approval when Mueller was head of FBI. If I were Mueller, I'd mysteriously have a previous appointment the day of his testimony....
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why don't you take a seat over there, Jeff?

HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YoakDaddy said:

Possibly. My $$$ is on Trump playing this to discredit Mueller before his testimony since it's proven that Trump wasn't closely connected to Epstein (cooperated with Miami investigation, kicked him out of club, and the backhanded-likes them younger comment) and the light sentence out of Miami had executive leadership level approval when Mueller was head of FBI. If I were Mueller, I'd mysteriously have a previous appointment the day of his testimony....

Charging and sentencing are not up to the FBI, those calls are DOJ's to make. The FBI's job is just investigation. The person most directly responsible for Epstein's lenient deal in 2008 is the current Secretary of Labor and onetime US Attorney, Alex Acosta. If you want to go higher up the food-chain, you get to former Attorney General Michael Mukasey.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YoakDaddy said:

Possibly. My $$$ is on Trump playing this to discredit Mueller before his testimony since it's proven that Trump wasn't closely connected to Epstein (cooperated with Miami investigation, kicked him out of club, and the backhanded-likes them younger comment) and the light sentence out of Miami had executive leadership level approval when Mueller was head of FBI. If I were Mueller, I'd mysteriously have a previous appointment the day of his testimony....


Mueller won't talk

He'll plead 5th or something
robby44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Jeff Epstein's pimp/girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell...



Why would the Clinton's want her attending Chelsea's wedding? This was POST-CONVICTION for Epstein: 33,000 acid washed emails about "weddings" ...and yoga tho

Seems got around quite a bit
She was photographed with Trump also

https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-trump-link-liking-women-on-the-younger-side-2019-7
ScruffyD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Guy runs a literal underage sex slave island for YEARS and Bob Mueller gives him 13 months where he can leave prison six days a week.

Yeah, I'd say he's well connected.


FBI Directors have zero to do with sentencing.
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lmao!! How in the world are all you folks claiming lets just follow the evidence and at the same time claiming to know the evidence and coming up with pre-emptive conspiracy theories in case Republicans get snagged into this?

The evidence is what ever it turns out to be. No matter who is involved or what party they are in, they need to have consequences.
fubar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

lmao!! How in the world are all you folks claiming lets just follow the evidence and at the same time claiming to know the evidence and coming up with pre-emptive conspiracy theories in case Republicans get snagged into this?

The evidence is what ever it turns out to be. No matter who is involved or what party they are in, they need to have consequences.
There are a lot of gullible people out there. Too many of them infest this board.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

lmao!! How in the world are all you folks claiming lets just follow the evidence and at the same time claiming to know the evidence and coming up with pre-emptive conspiracy theories in case Republicans get snagged into this?

The evidence is what ever it turns out to be. No matter who is involved or what party they are in, they need to have consequences.


Oh I'll go on record

There's plenty of republicans involved. Palenty!

If there was a way to bet on it and I knew truth would come out then I'd bet bigly on it too!
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

YoakDaddy said:

Possibly. My $$$ is on Trump playing this to discredit Mueller before his testimony since it's proven that Trump wasn't closely connected to Epstein (cooperated with Miami investigation, kicked him out of club, and the backhanded-likes them younger comment) and the light sentence out of Miami had executive leadership level approval when Mueller was head of FBI. If I were Mueller, I'd mysteriously have a previous appointment the day of his testimony....

Charging and sentencing are not up to the FBI, those calls are DOJ's to make. The FBI's job is just investigation. The person most directly responsible for Epstein's lenient deal in 2008 is the current Secretary of Labor and onetime US Attorney, Alex Acosta. If you want to go higher up the food-chain, you get to former Attorney General Michael Mukasey.

Yeah. Not disagreeing that DOJ is responsible for sentencing in those agreements (and IMO Acosta should've never been considered for his current role based on Miami and allowing that scumbag a lenient sentence), but the FBI is consulted and with Dershowitz (himself an alleged Epstein perv) working this case and stating the sentence had approvals at the highest levels, I've no doubt that Mueller was consulted.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florda_mike said:

PartyBear said:

lmao!! How in the world are all you folks claiming lets just follow the evidence and at the same time claiming to know the evidence and coming up with pre-emptive conspiracy theories in case Republicans get snagged into this?

The evidence is what ever it turns out to be. No matter who is involved or what party they are in, they need to have consequences.


Oh I'll go on record

There's plenty of republicans involved. Palenty!

If there was a way to bet on it and I knew truth would come out then I'd bet bigly on it too!
Agree with you, Sir. Republicans and Democrats be damned. Flush all of those pedophile Mfers!!! This should be something we can all agree on.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Absolutely

You can start with South Florida Republicans too

Possibly Rubio as there's no way he didn't know about this but as far as I know has never said anything about it one way or the other. There's others of course, some alive and others not
57Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe he can get the case moved to Chicago, where solid cases suddenly disappear.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:


Yep.


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.