YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
riflebear said:tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.
What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.
No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?riflebear said:tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.
What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.
No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Yea, most people say that and they think Clinton 50 Lewinski 21. Not 9th graders. That is sicko territory.tommie said:midgett said:
So at least 3 speculative theories are floating around.
1. They finally got Trump. Easy to guess this one. If true, he gone.
2. Trump finally got them. It's why Epstein was arrested again. Trump will finally exact his pound of flesh.
3. Epstein is known as a wealthy (& successful) hedge fund guy. I read all about the top managers and their strategies regularly. Always a fascinating topic. But I know little about Epstein. Yet, he runs big money. Theory is he got pictures so you have to let him manage your money at the usual 2 & 20. He throws it into an index fund and makes big bucks charging full fees. Wiring him millions for blackmail isn't suspicious. You're just investing in his fund. Genius but he oughtta be put into a prison wearing a name tag and having zero protection.
There's a bunch is bums around this guy. I know we never really know each other but someone knew this guy. Someone knew and did nothing.
Trump once said Epstein likes them young, that doesn't mean he knew young was 14. Young could be 22.
If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
Forest Bueller said:Yea, most people say that and they think Clinton 50 Lewinski 21. Not 9th graders. That is sicko territory.tommie said:midgett said:
So at least 3 speculative theories are floating around.
1. They finally got Trump. Easy to guess this one. If true, he gone.
2. Trump finally got them. It's why Epstein was arrested again. Trump will finally exact his pound of flesh.
3. Epstein is known as a wealthy (& successful) hedge fund guy. I read all about the top managers and their strategies regularly. Always a fascinating topic. But I know little about Epstein. Yet, he runs big money. Theory is he got pictures so you have to let him manage your money at the usual 2 & 20. He throws it into an index fund and makes big bucks charging full fees. Wiring him millions for blackmail isn't suspicious. You're just investing in his fund. Genius but he oughtta be put into a prison wearing a name tag and having zero protection.
There's a bunch is bums around this guy. I know we never really know each other but someone knew this guy. Someone knew and did nothing.
Trump once said Epstein likes them young, that doesn't mean he knew young was 14. Young could be 22.
Forest Bueller said:If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
tommie said:Forest Bueller said:If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Clinton looked the other way.
cinque said:Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?riflebear said:tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.
What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.
No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
tommie said:Forest Bueller said:If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Clinton looked the other way.
Canada2017 said:tommie said:Forest Bueller said:If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Clinton looked the other way.
Whether or not Bill looked the other way.....he is immune to prosecution .
JXL said:cinque said:Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?riflebear said:tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.
What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.
No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Actually, there has yet to be any evidence that the alleged accuser, "Katie Johnson," in fact exists. She has never been interviewed by anyone and the addresses she furnished in her court filings were of vacant houses.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/
tommie said:Canada2017 said:tommie said:Forest Bueller said:If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Clinton looked the other way.
Whether or not Bill looked the other way.....he is immune to prosecution .
Looking the other way is a moral failure. That list on this guy will be long. Then comes those who broke the law.
cinque said:Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?riflebear said:tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.
What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.
No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
JXL said:cinque said:Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?riflebear said:tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.
What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.
No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Actually, there has yet to be any evidence that the alleged accuser, "Katie Johnson," in fact exists. She has never been interviewed by anyone and the addresses she furnished in her court filings were of vacant houses.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/
HuMcK said:JXL said:cinque said:Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?riflebear said:tommie said:YoakDaddy said:BrooksBearLives said:
Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.
That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).
It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.
What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.
No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Actually, there has yet to be any evidence that the alleged accuser, "Katie Johnson," in fact exists. She has never been interviewed by anyone and the addresses she furnished in her court filings were of vacant houses.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/
You sure about that? This video is in the link you provided...
PartyBear said:
Yeah the Snopes article didn't exactly conclude at all that there is no evidence she exists as it had been claimed on this thread.
PartyBear said:
It actually didn't but I'm not surprised some of y'all actually believe this sort of stuff. I have a feeling most of aren't all that interested in where the evidence leads if it leads a certain way.
4chan has fooled both NYtimes and WaPo...HuMcK said:
Lol NYTimes and WaPo are fake news, but a screenshot from 4-Chan passes muster?