Epstein - The Scumbaggery Goes Deep

48,375 Views | 421 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by Florda_mike
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So Epstein flies to Africa and other places with Bill. Were they on a search for models? What about orphans from Haiti?
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.


If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.

What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.

No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.


If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.

What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.

No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.


Trump's quote seems like he suspects something ain't right. It's said Trump kicked him out of Mara Lago for hitting on an underaged girl. (Should have beat that dudes ass.)

As for young girls? I have no use for them.
cinque
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.


If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.

What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.

No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?
Forest Bueller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tommie said:

midgett said:

So at least 3 speculative theories are floating around.

1. They finally got Trump. Easy to guess this one. If true, he gone.

2. Trump finally got them. It's why Epstein was arrested again. Trump will finally exact his pound of flesh.

3. Epstein is known as a wealthy (& successful) hedge fund guy. I read all about the top managers and their strategies regularly. Always a fascinating topic. But I know little about Epstein. Yet, he runs big money. Theory is he got pictures so you have to let him manage your money at the usual 2 & 20. He throws it into an index fund and makes big bucks charging full fees. Wiring him millions for blackmail isn't suspicious. You're just investing in his fund. Genius but he oughtta be put into a prison wearing a name tag and having zero protection.



There's a bunch is bums around this guy. I know we never really know each other but someone knew this guy. Someone knew and did nothing.

Trump once said Epstein likes them young, that doesn't mean he knew young was 14. Young could be 22.
Yea, most people say that and they think Clinton 50 Lewinski 21. Not 9th graders. That is sicko territory.
By the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved.
Forest Bueller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.
By the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved.
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller said:

tommie said:

midgett said:

So at least 3 speculative theories are floating around.

1. They finally got Trump. Easy to guess this one. If true, he gone.

2. Trump finally got them. It's why Epstein was arrested again. Trump will finally exact his pound of flesh.

3. Epstein is known as a wealthy (& successful) hedge fund guy. I read all about the top managers and their strategies regularly. Always a fascinating topic. But I know little about Epstein. Yet, he runs big money. Theory is he got pictures so you have to let him manage your money at the usual 2 & 20. He throws it into an index fund and makes big bucks charging full fees. Wiring him millions for blackmail isn't suspicious. You're just investing in his fund. Genius but he oughtta be put into a prison wearing a name tag and having zero protection.



There's a bunch is bums around this guy. I know we never really know each other but someone knew this guy. Someone knew and did nothing.

Trump once said Epstein likes them young, that doesn't mean he knew young was 14. Young could be 22.
Yea, most people say that and they think Clinton 50 Lewinski 21. Not 9th graders. That is sicko territory.


Monica was 24 (still to young for me).
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.


I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Clinton looked the other way.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tommie said:

Forest Bueller said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.


I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Clinton looked the other way.


Whether or not Bill looked the other way.....he is immune to prosecution .
JXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

riflebear said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.


If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.

What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.

No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?


Actually, there has yet to be any evidence that the alleged accuser, "Katie Johnson," in fact exists. She has never been interviewed by anyone and the addresses she furnished in her court filings were of vacant houses.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/


riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tommie said:

Forest Bueller said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.


I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Clinton looked the other way.


He does every night next to Hillary
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

tommie said:

Forest Bueller said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.


I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Clinton looked the other way.


Whether or not Bill looked the other way.....he is immune to prosecution .


Looking the other way is a moral failure. That list on this guy will be long. Then comes those who broke the law.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JXL said:

cinque said:

riflebear said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.


If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.

What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.

No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?


Actually, there has yet to be any evidence that the alleged accuser, "Katie Johnson," in fact exists. She has never been interviewed by anyone and the addresses she furnished in her court filings were of vacant houses.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/


^^^ Surprise surprise ^^^

If Snopes is defending Trump in any way at all you can bet your ass he's clean .... again

Read it and weep, liberals!
corncob pipe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Clinton thinks that he is out in front of this by issuing the "knows nothing" statement....

hmmm.....

now we know that he knows we know.....

next comes the "I had my suspicions, but I didn't know for sure" excuse.....

then comes the fun & games word parsing...

and then

'But I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with any of Epstein's underage sex slaves. Not a single time. Never. And I need to go back to work raising money to fight diarrhea in Africa.'

Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tommie said:

Canada2017 said:

tommie said:

Forest Bueller said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.
If Clinton made 20 something trips on the guys plane, not sure he was only looking.


I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Clinton looked the other way.


Whether or not Bill looked the other way.....he is immune to prosecution .


Looking the other way is a moral failure. That list on this guy will be long. Then comes those who broke the law.


Looking the other way can be prosecuted as a criminal act.

Whether or not Bill broke any law.......he is immune to prosecution.

YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cinque said:

riflebear said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.


If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.

What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.

No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?

The civil suit made 20+ years after the alleged acts and after he announced he was running president? No. It was withdrawn. Those are some sick allegations though.
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JXL said:

cinque said:

riflebear said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.


If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.

What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.

No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?


Actually, there has yet to be any evidence that the alleged accuser, "Katie Johnson," in fact exists. She has never been interviewed by anyone and the addresses she furnished in her court filings were of vacant houses.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/




You sure about that? This video is in the link you provided...
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah the Snopes article didn't exactly conclude at all that there is no evidence she exists as it had been claimed on this thread.
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
corncob pipe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Its Bill Clinton's grand finale. This will be his biggest lie yet! Trump is on video saying that Bill Clinton will "have a lot of problems" with the Epstein case.
corncob pipe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Expect the stories about Deep Fake videos to ramp up. They want us to doubt the evil that is on these videos and who is on them.
JXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

JXL said:

cinque said:

riflebear said:

tommie said:

YoakDaddy said:

BrooksBearLives said:



Notice the public backhanded slam that Trump gave with the "younger" addition to the comment.


That's what Trump said. I don't understand why you feel a need to "deflect". That doesn't mean Trump knew the women were underage nor that he thinks that's ok. (I do find the silence deafening).

It's possible Trump and Clinton and way too many people looked the other way. Would t be the first time.


If people think Trump meant underage girls you are insane.

What 50 year old man doesn't like younger women, that is nothing new. Most men can'tet them but these billionaires could which is why Trump said that.

No one knows the facts yet so we will sit back and see where they lead us. Hopefully whoever was involved with moving underage girls for sex will be throw-in in jails and never get out.
Curious. Is the rape allegation against Trump made by 13 year old child still active?


Actually, there has yet to be any evidence that the alleged accuser, "Katie Johnson," in fact exists. She has never been interviewed by anyone and the addresses she furnished in her court filings were of vacant houses.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/




You sure about that? This video is in the link you provided...



An anonymous YouTube video is not an interview.
JXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

Yeah the Snopes article didn't exactly conclude at all that there is no evidence she exists as it had been claimed on this thread.


No it just concluded that no one had ever seen or talked to her and her addresses were vacant houses.
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It actually didn't but I'm not surprised some of y'all actually believe this sort of stuff. I have a feeling most of aren't all that interested in where the evidence leads if it leads a certain way.
Wichitabear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Feel the same way about your side PartyBear! In fact, I sometimes wonder if anybody really wants to hear the truth. Amusing
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7227791/Will-Epsteins-madam-operate-FBI.html
JXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

It actually didn't but I'm not surprised some of y'all actually believe this sort of stuff. I have a feeling most of aren't all that interested in where the evidence leads if it leads a certain way.


It actually did. Here are the quotes, straight from the article.

"As of now, all of the information about this lawsuit comes solely from the complaint filed by "Katie Johnson," and no one has as yet located, identified, or interviewed her. She was scheduled to appear at a press conference on 2 November 2016 but didn't show up, claiming that threats to her life kept her away. She reportedly dropped the lawsuit again on 4 November 2016 for the same reason."

"Even construing the pleading liberally, Plaintiff has not alleged any race-based or class-based animus against her, and consequently, her allegations fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted," the judge wrote the address listed on the paperwork leads to an abandoned property, and the phone number goes straight to voicemail.

ValhallaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who does Pelosi's daughter mean when she says 'faves'???!!!

That is an absolutely incredible revelation in public

Epstein had child porn in his apartment which both the police and media have confirmed...so it's prison rape for him even if he flips. The Feds can't give a child molester a pass for cooperating

The absolute unmitigated gall for a married man and former President of the United States to be taking pictures with his hands on young women on a private jet is mind boggling
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lol NYTimes and WaPo are fake news, but a screenshot from 4-Chan passes muster?

Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Lol NYTimes and WaPo are fake news, but a screenshot from 4-Chan passes muster?


4chan has fooled both NYtimes and WaPo...
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Of course, his only real job as AG is to protect The Boss and he can't do that from behind a recusal.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.