So, you still might vote for Biden?TexasScientist said:I can't vote for Trump. That doesn't mean I'll vote for Biden.HashTag said:Soooooo, you're saying that you're not voting for Trump in November?TexasScientist said:I apply the same standard to all politicians Democrat, Republican or others. Trump lies more than most Republicans or Democrats. He just exceedingly excels in dishonesty, compared to any others. The problem is, Trump is fundamentally dishonest. He was in his business practices, and he has carried that into the presidency, because, in part, he suffers from malignant narcissism. Regardless of what few good policies or actions he has taken, a person with his character traits and personality disorder is dangerous to have in the White House. We're seeing that played out in his inconsistencies while handling the coronavirus crisis.Oldbear83 said:Trump lies, but less often than most Democrats. Funny how you never chide a Democrat for lies.TexasScientist said:Does Trump lie?Oldbear83 said:No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"TexasScientist said:I see Trump for who he is.Oldbear83 said:** sigh **TexasScientist said:I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..Oldbear83 said:If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.TexasScientist said:Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.Oldbear83 said:I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.TexasScientist said:If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.Oldbear83 said:
You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.
Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
Is Trump a person of character?
As for character, since he started running for President Donald Trump has done a better job than any candidate/President in my lifetime. And that is the point.
You don't have to like him. You don't have to vote for him. But your BS hatred of Trump and holding him to a standard you clearly apply to no one else only makes you look malignant and idiotic.
Trump really is full of ****, isn't he?
30,563 Views |
371 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by TexasScientist
No. I won't vote for Biden either.HashTag said:So, you still might vote for Biden?TexasScientist said:I can't vote for Trump. That doesn't mean I'll vote for Biden.HashTag said:Soooooo, you're saying that you're not voting for Trump in November?TexasScientist said:I apply the same standard to all politicians Democrat, Republican or others. Trump lies more than most Republicans or Democrats. He just exceedingly excels in dishonesty, compared to any others. The problem is, Trump is fundamentally dishonest. He was in his business practices, and he has carried that into the presidency, because, in part, he suffers from malignant narcissism. Regardless of what few good policies or actions he has taken, a person with his character traits and personality disorder is dangerous to have in the White House. We're seeing that played out in his inconsistencies while handling the coronavirus crisis.Oldbear83 said:Trump lies, but less often than most Democrats. Funny how you never chide a Democrat for lies.TexasScientist said:Does Trump lie?Oldbear83 said:No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"TexasScientist said:I see Trump for who he is.Oldbear83 said:** sigh **TexasScientist said:I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..Oldbear83 said:If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.TexasScientist said:Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.Oldbear83 said:I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.TexasScientist said:If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.Oldbear83 said:
You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.
Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
Is Trump a person of character?
As for character, since he started running for President Donald Trump has done a better job than any candidate/President in my lifetime. And that is the point.
You don't have to like him. You don't have to vote for him. But your BS hatred of Trump and holding him to a standard you clearly apply to no one else only makes you look malignant and idiotic.
I can't vote for either...either
J.R. said:
I can't vote for either...either
I guess a felony conviction will still do that in some jurisdictions.
D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:"Evidence suggests you are correct"D. C. Bear said:Oldbear83 said:No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"TexasScientist said:I see Trump for who he is.Oldbear83 said:** sigh **TexasScientist said:I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..Oldbear83 said:If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.TexasScientist said:Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.Oldbear83 said:I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.TexasScientist said:If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.Oldbear83 said:
You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.
Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
Evidence suggests you are correct in your assessment.
I want to see your evidence please
Go do a content analysis if you are really interested. No, it's your assertion -- defend it. Defense is not my job but yours.
Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:"Evidence suggests you are correct"D. C. Bear said:Oldbear83 said:No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"TexasScientist said:I see Trump for who he is.Oldbear83 said:** sigh **TexasScientist said:I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..Oldbear83 said:If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.TexasScientist said:Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.Oldbear83 said:I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.TexasScientist said:If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.Oldbear83 said:
You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.
Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
Evidence suggests you are correct in your assessment.
I want to see your evidence please
Go do a content analysis if you are really interested. No, it's your assertion -- defend it. Defense is not my job but yours.
It's not my job to defend anything to your satisfaction.
Go analyze his posts for yourself if you are so interested in the evidence.
Trumps said he would pardon me if I propagated his perpetual lies!D. C. Bear said:J.R. said:
I can't vote for either...either
I guess a felony conviction will still do that in some jurisdictions.
I did not ask you to defend it to my satisfaction. I said defend it.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:"Evidence suggests you are correct"D. C. Bear said:Oldbear83 said:No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"TexasScientist said:I see Trump for who he is.Oldbear83 said:** sigh **TexasScientist said:I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..Oldbear83 said:If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.TexasScientist said:Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.Oldbear83 said:I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.TexasScientist said:If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.Oldbear83 said:
You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.
Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
Evidence suggests you are correct in your assessment.
I want to see your evidence please
Go do a content analysis if you are really interested. No, it's your assertion -- defend it. Defense is not my job but yours.
It's not my job to defend anything to your satisfaction.
Go analyze his posts for yourself if you are so interested in the evidence.
Waco1947
Waco1947 said:I did not ask you to defend it to my satisfaction. I said defend it.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:"Evidence suggests you are correct"D. C. Bear said:Oldbear83 said:No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"TexasScientist said:I see Trump for who he is.Oldbear83 said:** sigh **TexasScientist said:I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..Oldbear83 said:If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.TexasScientist said:Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.Oldbear83 said:I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.TexasScientist said:If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.Oldbear83 said:
You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.
Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
Evidence suggests you are correct in your assessment.
I want to see your evidence please
Go do a content analysis if you are really interested. No, it's your assertion -- defend it. Defense is not my job but yours.
It's not my job to defend anything to your satisfaction.
Go analyze his posts for yourself if you are so interested in the evidence.
It seems pretty apparent when reading posts from the poster in question that oldbear83 is likely to be correct.
I have now defended it to my satisfaction.
Good day.
My posts are based on objective reality. That disturbs some on this board for several reasons.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:I did not ask you to defend it to my satisfaction. I said defend it.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:"Evidence suggests you are correct"D. C. Bear said:Oldbear83 said:No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"TexasScientist said:I see Trump for who he is.Oldbear83 said:** sigh **TexasScientist said:I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..Oldbear83 said:If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.TexasScientist said:Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.Oldbear83 said:I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.TexasScientist said:If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.Oldbear83 said:
You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.
Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
Evidence suggests you are correct in your assessment.
I want to see your evidence please
Go do a content analysis if you are really interested. No, it's your assertion -- defend it. Defense is not my job but yours.
It's not my job to defend anything to your satisfaction.
Go analyze his posts for yourself if you are so interested in the evidence.
It seems pretty apparent when reading posts from the poster in question that oldbear83 is likely to be correct.
I have now defended it to my satisfaction.
Good day.
This is the funniest thing I've read so far this morning.TexasScientist said:My posts are based on objective reality. That disturbs some on this board for several reasons.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:I did not ask you to defend it to my satisfaction. I said defend it.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:"Evidence suggests you are correct"D. C. Bear said:Oldbear83 said:No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"TexasScientist said:I see Trump for who he is.Oldbear83 said:** sigh **TexasScientist said:I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..Oldbear83 said:If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.TexasScientist said:Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.Oldbear83 said:I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.TexasScientist said:If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.Oldbear83 said:
You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.
Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
Evidence suggests you are correct in your assessment.
I want to see your evidence please
Go do a content analysis if you are really interested. No, it's your assertion -- defend it. Defense is not my job but yours.
It's not my job to defend anything to your satisfaction.
Go analyze his posts for yourself if you are so interested in the evidence.
It seems pretty apparent when reading posts from the poster in question that oldbear83 is likely to be correct.
I have now defended it to my satisfaction.
Good day.
TexasScientist said:My posts are based on objective reality. That disturbs some on this board for several reasons.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:I did not ask you to defend it to my satisfaction. I said defend it.D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:D. C. Bear said:Waco1947 said:"Evidence suggests you are correct"D. C. Bear said:Oldbear83 said:No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"TexasScientist said:I see Trump for who he is.Oldbear83 said:** sigh **TexasScientist said:I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..Oldbear83 said:If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.TexasScientist said:Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.Oldbear83 said:I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.TexasScientist said:If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.Oldbear83 said:
You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.
Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
Evidence suggests you are correct in your assessment.
I want to see your evidence please
Go do a content analysis if you are really interested. No, it's your assertion -- defend it. Defense is not my job but yours.
It's not my job to defend anything to your satisfaction.
Go analyze his posts for yourself if you are so interested in the evidence.
It seems pretty apparent when reading posts from the poster in question that oldbear83 is likely to be correct.
I have now defended it to my satisfaction.
Good day.
The objectively reality that you cannot see the falsity of your statement above should disturb you, but is unlikely to do so.
I also find it interesting that Waco and TS are completing each other's post threads.HashTag said:This is the funniest thing I've read so far this morning.TexasScientist said:My posts are based on objective reality. That disturbs some on this board for several reasons.D. C. Bear said:
It seems pretty apparent when reading posts from the poster in question that oldbear83 is likely to be correct.
I have now defended it to my satisfaction.
Good day.
A fake minister and a fake scientist, together at last.
I'm just trying to keep you and your QAnon friends from straying too far from reality, into your world of myths and conspiracies.Oldbear83 said:I also find it interesting that Waco and TS are completing each other's post threads.HashTag said:This is the funniest thing I've read so far this morning.TexasScientist said:My posts are based on objective reality. That disturbs some on this board for several reasons.D. C. Bear said:
It seems pretty apparent when reading posts from the poster in question that oldbear83 is likely to be correct.
I have now defended it to my satisfaction.
Good day.
A fake minister and a fake scientist, together at last.
You keep making that false claim about Q or Qanon (I presume you consider them the same), when the fact is it was you, and only you, who brought that up here.TexasScientist said:I'm just trying to keep you and your QAnon friends from straying too far from reality, into your world of myths and conspiracies.Oldbear83 said:I also find it interesting that Waco and TS are completing each other's post threads.HashTag said:This is the funniest thing I've read so far this morning.TexasScientist said:My posts are based on objective reality. That disturbs some on this board for several reasons.D. C. Bear said:
It seems pretty apparent when reading posts from the poster in question that oldbear83 is likely to be correct.
I have now defended it to my satisfaction.
Good day.
A fake minister and a fake scientist, together at last.
You are not helping your case. And isn't it confusing for you to keep track of your sock puppets?
My case is trying to help you.Oldbear83 said:You keep making that false claim about Q or Qanon (I presume you consider them the same), when the fact is it was you, and only you, who brought that up here.TexasScientist said:I'm just trying to keep you and your QAnon friends from straying too far from reality, into your world of myths and conspiracies.Oldbear83 said:I also find it interesting that Waco and TS are completing each other's post threads.HashTag said:This is the funniest thing I've read so far this morning.TexasScientist said:My posts are based on objective reality. That disturbs some on this board for several reasons.D. C. Bear said:
It seems pretty apparent when reading posts from the poster in question that oldbear83 is likely to be correct.
I have now defended it to my satisfaction.
Good day.
A fake minister and a fake scientist, together at last.
You are not helping your case. And isn't it confusing for you to keep track of your sock puppets?
Corrected for accuracy, Waco/TS. Come on, drop your latest failed try and move on, maybe the next one will at least be original.TexasScientist said:My case is trying to lie to you.Oldbear83 said:You keep making that false claim about Q or Qanon (I presume you consider them the same), when the fact is it was you, and only you, who brought that up here.TexasScientist said:I'm just trying to keep you and your QAnon friends from straying too far from reality, into your world of myths and conspiracies.Oldbear83 said:I also find it interesting that Waco and TS are completing each other's post threads.HashTag said:This is the funniest thing I've read so far this morning.TexasScientist said:My posts are based on objective reality. That disturbs some on this board for several reasons.D. C. Bear said:
It seems pretty apparent when reading posts from the poster in question that oldbear83 is likely to be correct.
I have now defended it to my satisfaction.
Good day.
A fake minister and a fake scientist, together at last.
You are not helping your case. And isn't it confusing for you to keep track of your sock puppets?
I didn't know who QAnon was until about a week ago when a libbie mentioned. Try again.TexasScientist said:I'm just trying to keep you and your QAnon friends from straying too far from reality, into your world of myths and conspiracies.Oldbear83 said:I also find it interesting that Waco and TS are completing each other's post threads.HashTag said:This is the funniest thing I've read so far this morning.TexasScientist said:My posts are based on objective reality. That disturbs some on this board for several reasons.D. C. Bear said:
It seems pretty apparent when reading posts from the poster in question that oldbear83 is likely to be correct.
I have now defended it to my satisfaction.
Good day.
A fake minister and a fake scientist, together at last.
Your reality is you see what you believe instead of the other way around
Actually, that would be religion. Try again.HashTag said:I didn't know who QAnon was until about a week ago when a libbie mentioned. Try again.TexasScientist said:I'm just trying to keep you and your QAnon friends from straying too far from reality, into your world of myths and conspiracies.Oldbear83 said:I also find it interesting that Waco and TS are completing each other's post threads.HashTag said:This is the funniest thing I've read so far this morning.TexasScientist said:My posts are based on objective reality. That disturbs some on this board for several reasons.D. C. Bear said:
It seems pretty apparent when reading posts from the poster in question that oldbear83 is likely to be correct.
I have now defended it to my satisfaction.
Good day.
A fake minister and a fake scientist, together at last.
Your reality is you see what you believe instead of the other way around
Thank you and you have a blessed day
TexasScientist said:
That looks like a picture of Trump living, rent free, in your head. Looks like it's a little cramped in there. No accounting for tiny spaces, I suppose.
Just something to help you start your day.Bearitto said:TexasScientist said:
That looks like a picture of Trump living, rent free, in your head. Looks like it's a little cramped in there. No accounting for tiny spaces, I suppose.