Trump really is full of ****, isn't he?

41,008 Views | 371 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by TexasScientist
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

The Atlantic is no more trustworthy to speak regarding President Trump, than was Breitbart to speak regarding President Obama.

If this is what you are using for your information, small wonder you cannot reach sound conclusions, TS.
  • Overall, we rate The Atlantic Left-Center Biased due to editorial positions and High for factual reporting based on excellent sourcing of information.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-atlantic/
So, the lefty site likes the lefty site.

That all you got?
Hardly. It appears anything but Fox, OAN, ore Alex Jones is left in you're book. You may should consider your sources for information. When you confine your sources of information, you begin to get a skewed vision of the world.
Amusing, The trick of 'set-up-a-site-to"face check" anyone-we-want-to-trash' has been around for years now, and is painfully obvious.

I don't watch OAN or Alex Jones or Fox by the way, but since you missed everything else in your post it's no shock you got that wrong too.
My mistake. I should have known you ascribe to QAnon.
Another swing and a miss.


No. Knocked it out of the park.
Only in your misfocused imagination

Where do you hear/read Qanon, anyway? I only found vague references when I Googled him after your post. I guess you pay a lot more attention to the fringe than I do.
It's on 8chan and another dark site. It's all over Facebook. Go to Facebook and type in QAnon on the search bar, and you'll find memes and links to where Florda hangs out. It's viral and extensive and completely over the top. So much so that I don't see how it is not at least partially driven by a state actor i.e. Russia or China or both. You'd be surprised how many people are buying into this tripe.
I'm not much of a Facebook guy, and have never used sites like 8chan. But it sounds like the emotional sibling of any number of left-wing conspiracy sites.

No reason to focus on the outliers.
It's definitely not left wing. It is way far to the extreme right. Pro Trump. They essentially believe: Trump is their political and existential savior. Trump will vanquish the Hollywood elite. and other elites like Bill Gates, Tom Hanks, the Bushes, the Clintons and other members of the illuminati, who kidnap children around the world, hide them in tunnels, torture them to collect and drink adrenochrome - other beliefs like Fauci and Gates are planning to inject the world with vaccines that will give them control over people. Trump is aligned with military special forces who are waiting for the right moment to arrest all of these people and execute them. Trump and his allies give clues in his speaches, and clues, signs, and other hints over the internet and through other means of what is going to occur.

That's what the Q signs people hold up, or wear on t-shirts, and ball caps at Trump rallies is all about. Check it out. I know a little about it because a high school friend of my wife has gotten caught up in this, and believes it whole heartedly. It's a significant following in terms of numbers of people, which I find very disturbing that many people believe it.
You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.


Look in the mirror.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
OB83 is no helpful to a discussion or debate
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
OB83 is no help to a fascist in a discussion or debate
FIFY, Waco.

muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"the Hollywood elite. and other elites like Bill Gates, Tom Hanks, the Bushes, the Clintons and other members of the illuminati, who kidnap children around the world, hide them in tunnels, torture them to collect and drink adrenochrome - other beliefs like Fauci and Gates are planning to inject the world with vaccines that will give them control over people."

a lot of truth in there. You don't hangout with Marina Abramovic if you aren't into satanic type rituals and she is close with a lot of those mentioned above.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.


Amusing post.

Since in regards to Trump, you have not applied objective reasoning in over 18 months .
Bearitto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
OB83 is no help to a fascist in a discussion or debate
FIFY, Waco.




You fixed his grammar too. Well done.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.


Amusing post.

Since in regards to Trump, you have not applied objective reasoning in over 18 months .
On the contrary, I'm very objective about Trump. He makes it easy. I'm just not caught up in the cult of personality.
Bearitto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Canada2017 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.


Amusing post.

Since in regards to Trump, you have not applied objective reasoning in over 18 months .
On the contrary, I'm very objective about Trump.



Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Canada2017 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.


Amusing post.

Since in regards to Trump, you have not applied objective reasoning in over 18 months .
On the contrary, I'm very objective about Trump. He makes it easy. I'm just not caught up in the cult of personality.
Classic
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Canada2017 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.


Amusing post.

Since in regards to Trump, you have not applied objective reasoning in over 18 months .
On the contrary, I'm very objective about Trump. He makes it easy. I'm just not caught up in the cult of personality.

Yes, you are objective, reasoned and insightful about the President. That the President engages in buffoonery and ignorance is not your doing. You simply report and reflect on it. Well done TS
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

TexasScientist said:

Canada2017 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.


Amusing post.

Since in regards to Trump, you have not applied objective reasoning in over 18 months .
On the contrary, I'm very objective about Trump. He makes it easy. I'm just not caught up in the cult of personality.

Yes, you are objective, reasoned and insightful about the President. That the President engages in buffoonery and ignorance is not your doing. You simply report and reflect on it. Well done TS
^^ Confirmation bias demonstrated ^^
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize your following a cult leader..
** sigh **

Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..
** sigh **

Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
I see Trump for who he is.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..
** sigh **

Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
I see Trump for who he is.
No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..
** sigh **

Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
I see Trump for who he is.
No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"


Evidence suggests you are correct in your assessment.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..
** sigh **

Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
I see Trump for who he is.
No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"
Does Trump lie?
Is Trump a person of character?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..
** sigh **

Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
I see Trump for who he is.
No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"
Does Trump lie?
Is Trump a person of character?

Trump lies, but less often than most Democrats. Funny how you never chide a Democrat for lies.

As for character, since he started running for President Donald Trump has done a better job than any candidate/President in my lifetime. And that is the point.

You don't have to like him. You don't have to vote for him. But your BS hatred of Trump and holding him to a standard you clearly apply to no one else only makes you look malignant and idiotic.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..
** sigh **

Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
I see Trump for who he is.
No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"


Evidence suggests you are correct in your assessment.
"Evidence suggests you are correct"
I want to see your evidence please
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..
** sigh **

Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
I see Trump for who he is.
No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"


Evidence suggests you are correct in your assessment.
"Evidence suggests you are correct"
I want to see your evidence please


Go do a content analysis if you are really interested.
Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..
** sigh **

Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
I see Trump for who he is.
No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"
Does Trump lie?
Is Trump a person of character?

Trump lies, but less often than most Democrats. Funny how you never chide a Democrat for lies.

As for character, since he started running for President Donald Trump has done a better job than any candidate/President in my lifetime. And that is the point.

You don't have to like him. You don't have to vote for him. But your BS hatred of Trump and holding him to a standard you clearly apply to no one else only makes you look malignant and idiotic.
I apply the same standard to all politicians Democrat, Republican or others. Trump lies more than most Republicans or Democrats. He just exceedingly excels in dishonesty, compared to any others. The problem is, Trump is fundamentally dishonest. He was in his business practices, and he has carried that into the presidency, because, in part, he suffers from malignant narcissism. Regardless of what few good policies or actions he has taken, a person with his character traits and personality disorder is dangerous to have in the White House. We're seeing that played out in his inconsistencies while handling the coronavirus crisis.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Judging from your posts here, your prior post on this thread is the biggest lie of the year.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Judging from your posts here, your prior post on this thread is the biggest lie of the year.
Go watch his remarks in the press conference to get his exact remarks. Then go look up the definition of hyperbole. Then examine (as opposed to justify) how you as a 'good Christian' can embrace someone of Trump's character.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

Judging from your posts here, your prior post on this thread is the biggest lie of the year.
Go watch his remarks in the press conference to get his exact remarks. Then go look up the definition of hyperbole. Then examine (as opposed to justify) how you as a 'good Christian' can embrace someone of Trump's character.
I get it.

You don't like him, and probably never will.

But the imposition of a special standard for Trump which you clearly never used for other Presidents is the hallmark of hypocrisy.

TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

Judging from your posts here, your prior post on this thread is the biggest lie of the year.
Go watch his remarks in the press conference to get his exact remarks. Then go look up the definition of hyperbole. Then examine (as opposed to justify) how you as a 'good Christian' can embrace someone of Trump's character.
I get it.

You don't like him, and probably never will.

But the imposition of a special standard for Trump which you clearly never used for other Presidents is the hallmark of hypocrisy.


I hold all presidents to the same standard. Other presidents pale in comparison to Trump's shortcomings.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

Judging from your posts here, your prior post on this thread is the biggest lie of the year.
Go watch his remarks in the press conference to get his exact remarks. Then go look up the definition of hyperbole. Then examine (as opposed to justify) how you as a 'good Christian' can embrace someone of Trump's character.
I get it.

You don't like him, and probably never will.

But the imposition of a special standard for Trump which you clearly never used for other Presidents is the hallmark of hypocrisy.


I hold all presidents to the same standard. Other presidents pale in comparison to Trump's shortcomings.
The only clear standard you demonstrate, is whether they are Democrats. If yes, they can do no wrong. If no, you will find something to say against them, no matter how dishonest or what double-standard you must use to do so.

You make Florda look balanced and restrained.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

Judging from your posts here, your prior post on this thread is the biggest lie of the year.
Go watch his remarks in the press conference to get his exact remarks. Then go look up the definition of hyperbole. Then examine (as opposed to justify) how you as a 'good Christian' can embrace someone of Trump's character.
I get it.

You don't like him, and probably never will.

But the imposition of a special standard for Trump which you clearly never used for other Presidents is the hallmark of hypocrisy.


I hold all presidents to the same standard. Other presidents pale in comparison to Trump's shortcomings.
The only clear standard you demonstrate, is whether they are Democrats. If yes, they can do no wrong. If no, you will find something to say against them, no matter how dishonest or what double-standard you must use to do so.

You make Florda look balanced and restrained.
You're talking again before you're thinking. I challenge you to find anywhere on this board I have been in support of Democrats. I'm honest enough to acknowledge when they get something right, the same as with Republicans. I just refuse to follow Republicans who are blindly following Trump over the edge.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TS, the only people you are fooling use the initials T and S.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..
** sigh **

Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
I see Trump for who he is.
No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"
Does Trump lie?
Is Trump a person of character?

Trump lies, but less often than most Democrats. Funny how you never chide a Democrat for lies.

As for character, since he started running for President Donald Trump has done a better job than any candidate/President in my lifetime. And that is the point.

You don't have to like him. You don't have to vote for him. But your BS hatred of Trump and holding him to a standard you clearly apply to no one else only makes you look malignant and idiotic.
I apply the same standard to all politicians Democrat, Republican or others. Trump lies more than most Republicans or Democrats. He just exceedingly excels in dishonesty, compared to any others. The problem is, Trump is fundamentally dishonest. He was in his business practices, and he has carried that into the presidency, because, in part, he suffers from malignant narcissism. Regardless of what few good policies or actions he has taken, a person with his character traits and personality disorder is dangerous to have in the White House. We're seeing that played out in his inconsistencies while handling the coronavirus crisis.
Soooooo, you're saying that you're not voting for Trump in November?
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HashTag said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:



You really don't bother to read, TS. I wrote that this is obviously the 'emotional sibling' of the other extreme sites.

Funny how you obsess on only one end of extremists.
If you new how to communicate better, maybe you wouldn't be misunderstood.
I communicate well. Your bias makes it too hard for you to understand.

The proof is that only progressives fail to grasp what I say.
Confirmation bias fuels your thoughts. Try objective reality. It will do you a lot of good.
If you say that to yourself, TS, you would be right and be much better off going forward.
I say that to myself all the time, which is why I'm trying to help you see beyond the end of your nose and recognize you're following a cult leader..
** sigh **

Denial remains the most common of human responses to bad news. TS proves that so.
I see Trump for who he is.
No, you project your emnity and bias and call it "Trump"
Does Trump lie?
Is Trump a person of character?

Trump lies, but less often than most Democrats. Funny how you never chide a Democrat for lies.

As for character, since he started running for President Donald Trump has done a better job than any candidate/President in my lifetime. And that is the point.

You don't have to like him. You don't have to vote for him. But your BS hatred of Trump and holding him to a standard you clearly apply to no one else only makes you look malignant and idiotic.
I apply the same standard to all politicians Democrat, Republican or others. Trump lies more than most Republicans or Democrats. He just exceedingly excels in dishonesty, compared to any others. The problem is, Trump is fundamentally dishonest. He was in his business practices, and he has carried that into the presidency, because, in part, he suffers from malignant narcissism. Regardless of what few good policies or actions he has taken, a person with his character traits and personality disorder is dangerous to have in the White House. We're seeing that played out in his inconsistencies while handling the coronavirus crisis.
Soooooo, you're saying that you're not voting for Trump in November?
I can't vote for Trump. That doesn't mean I'll vote for Biden.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.