tommie said:
Flaming Moderate said:
tommie said:
Flaming Moderate said:
ATL Bear said:
Sam Lowry said:
ATL Bear said:
At 2500 cases and 34 deaths in Texas, you'd think there would be some praise on how it has been handled.
That's about where New York was 12 days ago, except they had half as many deaths.
A city like New York is prime for a virus spread. People living on top of each other reliant upon public transportation. I'm willing to bet Texas won't get nearly as bad given measures taken thus far, and that infected people won't be crammed on buses and subways on their way to and from the hospital.
It has flummoxed me that cities will not shut down public transportation. I am not a clinician, but that seems like a pretty significant means to spread any virus, especially one that can live outside the body on metal surfaces. Worse too, it de-localizes the spread. Most people usually go out close to home, but public transportation spreads it across the entire region. Dallas for example is still running DART, which means an infected person in South Dallas and spread it to Plano and vice versa.
It's because for many without cars, it's the way we get around. If you shut down public transportation you also prevent first responders from getting to work. You stop the poor from accessing groceries. You cut off access If the essential worker to the essential work.
I understand, but there seems to be tension being serious about fighting the spread of the virus. A true effort requires pain and inconvenience across the board, and closing it down seems like the right thing to do. Yes, it stinks - but all of this stinks.
You can't fight this with 50% of the staff.
What is suggestion on how to get the $12 an hour hospital staff to work? They're unseen but they clean the rooms, wash the soiled sheets, turn the beds, sanitize the equipment. If you cut public transportation and in effect increase the number of people who call out (along with those who get sick), we all lose.
We agree we need to stop the non complainant from mucking you the gears.
I don't know - you may be right in terms of number of folks that use it, which I think feeds the argument for closing (don't want staff infecting other clinicians and patients). Fully admit, I am not a DART rider - given the situation, seems like people could drive, and one-car families obviously probably on need one care right now. I appreciate your perspective - I won't go round and round with you because you're likely more correct than me (I'll admit I'm naive, but I know lots of people across the socio-economic spectrum, and literally every family has at least one car). I may be 100% wrong, but I have assumed 99% of the folks talking DART did so out of convenience not necessity (but again, I likely am wrong). I'm also not clinical - just seems like public transportation would be a huge spreader of the disease, and if we're serious we have to make tough choices. (of course I don't want anyone to starve - that's where you figure out a Meals on Wheels or Uber-type solution, i.e. Medicare relaxes rules on paying for transportation).