Sam Lowry said:
Oldbear83 said:
Bearitto said:
Waco1947 said:
Yes, the government should and can stop armed people from entering a capital. First example The President. The Secret Service will have someone's butt on the ground in a NY second.
As a citizen I have an equal right to security in the capital. Your gun is threatening. Rights swing both ways.
Nonviolent protest is bad, but burning and looting is all good. It depends on your race, right?
If you can loot in person,
then you can vote in person.
Just saying ...
Who is "you" in the above post?
Presumably, looters. The looters in question, fit within the demographic (black and inner-city) of the individuals leftists and democrats and the media have told us all, ad infinitum, are incapable of getting identification and being responsible to take on basic civic duties. Leftist, the media and democrats are again claiming this same demographic is acting monolithically out of "frustration" and that this is a "peaceful protest" or a justified "uprising" by this specific demographic of people who are only committing such heinous acts of violence and destruction because "when civility leads to death, revolting is the only logical reaction." Leftist and media approved spokesmen for all blacks have called criminals engaged in the riots and looting "Freedom Fighters in Minneapolis" who are "fighting for liberation". Liberation of whom from whom? Revolting of whom from whom?Perhaps you should look to the black generated "us" and "we" rhetoric fueling this dumpster fire if you are interested in who "you" refers to.
You can't have it both ways. You can't in one breath say "they" (blacks) are being targeted for racist enforcement or "they" (blacks) can't figure out how to get ID to vote and then suddenly ask, "who is the 'you'" you are referring to. That simply demonstrates breathtaking intellectual dishonesty. The argument leftists make is one of absurd race baiting. Ridicule of that argument will always be on those same grounds and trying to pretend that it's not specifically responsive to the absurdist racial leftist arguments is tantamount to a lie.
