Amen!Redbrickbear said:
Good.
The government should never be able to prevent its legally armed citizens for entering THE PEOPLES state capitols.
Taxpaying citizens own those buildings...they don't belong to whatever failed lawyer turned politician who happens to be temporary holding the office.
The last pic in his posted article shows a wall of state police blocking the entrance to the capitol.Redbrickbear said:
Good.
The government should never be able to prevent its legally armed citizens for entering THE PEOPLES state capitols.
Redbrickbear said:
Good.
The government should never be able to prevent its legally armed citizens for entering THE PEOPLES state capitols.
Taxpaying citizens own those buildings...they don't belong to whatever failed lawyer turned politician who happens to be temporary holding the office.
There you go bringing facts into a feels argument. How dare you destroy Waco47's narrative.El Oso said:The last pic in his posted article shows a wall of state police blocking the entrance to the capitol.Redbrickbear said:
Good.
The government should never be able to prevent its legally armed citizens for entering THE PEOPLES state capitols.
All these people with guns just stayed outside.
Clearly the guns were not supposed to intimidate anyone. Nobody pulled one out to tell the police they were out of line.
Did you clutch your pearls?Waco1947 said:
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2020/04/30/protesters-gathering-outside-capitol-amid-covid-19-restrictions/3054911001/
Guns? Really? Shoot a trooper one of the good guys and 1st Responders'?"
What silliness!
Yes headed to court.Jack and DP said:
Sounds like the gov will be in court tomorrow. She pushed the people too far.
Quote:
Michigan legislators say they'll let state of emergency expire; protesters demand state reopens
Legislatures say they're going to let state of emergency expire at midnight
LANSING, Mich. Thursday was a chaotic day in Lansing as legislators say they're going to let the Michigan state of emergency expire at midnight and protesters demand the state reopen for business.
The state of emergency declared by Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer on March 10 is set to expire at midnight. Whitmer initially asked the legislature to extend it, but on Wednesday, she said she didn't need them to. Legislators disagree.
Absolutely!Redbrickbear said:
Good.
The government should never be able to prevent its legally armed citizens for entering THE PEOPLES state capitols.
Taxpaying citizens own those buildings...they don't belong to whatever failed lawyer turned politician who happens to be temporary holding the office.
That's wrong toorobby44 said:Redbrickbear said:
Good.
The government should never be able to prevent its legally armed citizens for entering THE PEOPLES state capitols.
Taxpaying citizens own those buildings...they don't belong to whatever failed lawyer turned politician who happens to be temporary holding the office.
Yes
But it's been done before. 1967 California passed the Mulford Act to keep Black Panthers from legally carrying
https://www.history.com/.amp/news/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act
The Capitol controlled by the GOP would have brought out the national guard.PartyBear said:
Robby these folks here would be literally howling about the need for civil war if a multicultural crowd converged on a state Capitol controlled by the GOP armed with machine guns and wearing paramilitary gear in protest of something.
And that's the beauty of Bill of Rights. You don't "need" a gun to have the right to own one.tommie said:
Why do they need the guns?
I feel like the sides would flip if it was protesting the inability to murder babies in the womb.HashTag said:And that's the beauty of Bill of Rights. You don't "need" a gun to have the right to own one.tommie said:
Why do they need the guns?
Wait, none of the stay at home orders are having an impact? Or people carrying guns aren't having an impact? Not sure what you're saying.Flaming Moderate said:
The unfortunate part is none of those measures are having any impact on the spread ... just like most rational people predicted.
tommie said:
Why do they need the guns?
Could be. Both sides have proven they have the ability to quickly compromise their "values" if it means getting what they want or getting someone they want.Flaming Moderate said:I feel like the sides would flip if it was protesting the inability to murder babies in the womb.HashTag said:And that's the beauty of Bill of Rights. You don't "need" a gun to have the right to own one.tommie said:
Why do they need the guns?
HashTag said:And that's the beauty of Bill of Rights. You don't "need" a gun to have the right to own one.tommie said:
Why do they need the guns?
Guns make some men feel more secure.tommie said:
Why do they need the guns?
Sam Lowry said:
And when the curve spikes again, the meltdown will be visible from space.
I give it six months before Obama's accused of creating the virus in a secret laboratory underneath a mosque.
False. No one got shot, but nice try.Waco1947 said:
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2020/04/30/protesters-gathering-outside-capitol-amid-covid-19-restrictions/3054911001/
Guns? Really? Shoot a trooper one of the good guys and 1st Responders'?"
What silliness!
You have it?tommie said:HashTag said:And that's the beauty of Bill of Rights. You don't "need" a gun to have the right to own one.tommie said:
Why do they need the guns?
I'm not asking about the right. I'm asking about the reason.
I'm now wearing a mask (reason) so that I don't spread the virus to you.
fadskier said:You have it?tommie said:HashTag said:And that's the beauty of Bill of Rights. You don't "need" a gun to have the right to own one.tommie said:
Why do they need the guns?
I'm not asking about the right. I'm asking about the reason.
I'm now wearing a mask (reason) so that I don't spread the virus to you.
Why indeed? That's point of the OPtommie said:
Why do they need the guns?
Waco1947 said:Why indeed? That's point of the OPtommie said:
Why do they need the guns?
I own guns and am all for the 2nd Amendment but agree with you on this point. it makes about as much sense as being able to wear a mask into a liquor store.............Oh wait!!!!!!Canada2017 said:tommie said:
Why do they need the guns?
They don't .
It's stupid to carry guns into any capital building .
