BLM protests caused $2 billion of damage in insurance claims in the first 2 weeks.
Had That Been Antifa & Black Lives Matter Yesterday in DC.........
10,636 Views |
154 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by whiterock
Don't worry about it. They will pay it back someday.Jack Bauer said:
BLM protests caused $2 billion of damage in insurance claims in the first 2 weeks.
Maybe we can take it out of reparations and future stimulus checks?
Holy ****, that's so ****ing racist.Doc Holliday said:BLM asserts that racism is their worst enemy when black lives are mostly murdered by other black lives.BrooksBearLives said:There were 3,000 demonstrations last year alone and almost no deaths. BLM has been part of tens of thousands of demonstrations with no death. ONE delusional gunman and you will dismiss BLM?BearlySpeaking said:What is the virus that caused a BLM supporter to murder 5 police officers in Dallas and wound 9 others at a BLM rally? What is the virus that caused mass destruction across America last year and resulted in multiple deaths? What is the signal causing you to want to burn down our cities since Ferguson in 2014, culminating in last year's riots you and your comrades celebrated?jupiter said:
Why there is a double standard
To attempt to answer this question, let me try to draw an analogy to the body's immune system.
"Viruses" (say like communism, fascism) are often the causes of violence.
If a virus invades the body, it will attempt to hijack a (tissue, organ) cell and will begin replicating copies of itself. The infected cell has no real way to defeat the virus on its own, except perhaps through a passive mechanism to recognize the intruder and to turn off its replication mechanisms to prevent them from being hijacked.
For the most part however, the cell relies on the body's immune cells, Killer T-Cells, B-Cells (and others) to be able to recognize and destroy the virus.
Different "viruses" will often try to trick the immune system to over react and either attack itself, turn off an immune response entirely, or to fool T-Cells into attacking healthy cells in the body.
Different people have different jobs/roles to play in society, just like these different cells do.
Since different people serve different purposes in society and posses different tools to fight "infection",and are susceptible to infection by different types of viruses to varying degrees, we shouldn't judge them on the basis that we think they should all act the same way in the face of an "infection".
Violence is a societal problem that effects the health of the whole system/ body.
The burden of ending certain types of violence in society therefore weighs more heavily on some over others.
Which brings me back to the point about why there is a double standard.
Some people might really only be able to passively reject violence. Some people may be more prone to/ susceptible to being infected by one type of violence over another. Some people may only support violence based on personal reasons as opposed to someone who supports large scale mass social violence.
Right now the violence that pervades our country is largely due to a fascist virus that is attacking our "Killer T-Cells" and causing our immune response to go haywire.
The signal being secreted that is causing you to want to attack "Democratic" organ cells is a false one, and is being put out by this fascist virus in order to trick you into attacking it. For the most part these cells are healthy and are functioning properly and are not infected, and do not currently require an immune response against them. It is not a true signal from a B-Cell instructing you to do this.
There are only a few infected T-cells that need to be quarantined that are the ones responsible for pushing out copies of this "fascist" virus that really need to be addressed right now. If you are a T-Cell, that's the true signal from your body's B-Cells you should be listening to. This is what will allow us to get healthy and end this sickness that is plaguing us right now.
Fine. I could see that standard if you would apply it to your own party. Where is your condemnation of Trump for the deaths caused by his rally? He was every bit as responsible for the insurrection as BLM was for that shooter. He invited people. He fed them lies about the election. He told them they could take their country back (there was literally nothing they could do to stop the election at that point, only delay it).
If you're going to condemn BLM, then you HAVE to condemn Trump.
Bro it's total BS when they grandstand and then turn on 21 savage rapping about having his ops ready to gun down anyone that messes with his drug empire.
First of all, almost ALL murder is segregated. Are you going to talk about "white on white" crime? Where you at? Black on black crime isn't a thing anymore than "yellow on yellow" or "idiot on idiot" crime is.
You want the stats? I'll show you the stats.
And artists reflect the world they're in. If you think it's the other way around, then how many men in Reno did you shoot just to watch them die?
I can tell you don't spend a lot of time with people who don't agree with you because your arguments are absolute *****
In 2015, 10 US Cities paid out a quarter of a billion in misconduct settlements alone. It's going to be higher this year.Jack Bauer said:
BLM protests caused $2 billion of damage in insurance claims in the first 2 weeks.
If you have an issue with waste, it would make sense to start there.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/cost-of-police-misconduct-cases-soars-in-big-u-s-cities-1437013834
So why are we only talking about non segregated murder?BrooksBearLives said:First of all, almost ALL murder is segregated.Doc Holliday said:BLM asserts that racism is their worst enemy when black lives are mostly murdered by other black lives.BrooksBearLives said:There were 3,000 demonstrations last year alone and almost no deaths. BLM has been part of tens of thousands of demonstrations with no death. ONE delusional gunman and you will dismiss BLM?BearlySpeaking said:What is the virus that caused a BLM supporter to murder 5 police officers in Dallas and wound 9 others at a BLM rally? What is the virus that caused mass destruction across America last year and resulted in multiple deaths? What is the signal causing you to want to burn down our cities since Ferguson in 2014, culminating in last year's riots you and your comrades celebrated?jupiter said:
Why there is a double standard
To attempt to answer this question, let me try to draw an analogy to the body's immune system.
"Viruses" (say like communism, fascism) are often the causes of violence.
If a virus invades the body, it will attempt to hijack a (tissue, organ) cell and will begin replicating copies of itself. The infected cell has no real way to defeat the virus on its own, except perhaps through a passive mechanism to recognize the intruder and to turn off its replication mechanisms to prevent them from being hijacked.
For the most part however, the cell relies on the body's immune cells, Killer T-Cells, B-Cells (and others) to be able to recognize and destroy the virus.
Different "viruses" will often try to trick the immune system to over react and either attack itself, turn off an immune response entirely, or to fool T-Cells into attacking healthy cells in the body.
Different people have different jobs/roles to play in society, just like these different cells do.
Since different people serve different purposes in society and posses different tools to fight "infection",and are susceptible to infection by different types of viruses to varying degrees, we shouldn't judge them on the basis that we think they should all act the same way in the face of an "infection".
Violence is a societal problem that effects the health of the whole system/ body.
The burden of ending certain types of violence in society therefore weighs more heavily on some over others.
Which brings me back to the point about why there is a double standard.
Some people might really only be able to passively reject violence. Some people may be more prone to/ susceptible to being infected by one type of violence over another. Some people may only support violence based on personal reasons as opposed to someone who supports large scale mass social violence.
Right now the violence that pervades our country is largely due to a fascist virus that is attacking our "Killer T-Cells" and causing our immune response to go haywire.
The signal being secreted that is causing you to want to attack "Democratic" organ cells is a false one, and is being put out by this fascist virus in order to trick you into attacking it. For the most part these cells are healthy and are functioning properly and are not infected, and do not currently require an immune response against them. It is not a true signal from a B-Cell instructing you to do this.
There are only a few infected T-cells that need to be quarantined that are the ones responsible for pushing out copies of this "fascist" virus that really need to be addressed right now. If you are a T-Cell, that's the true signal from your body's B-Cells you should be listening to. This is what will allow us to get healthy and end this sickness that is plaguing us right now.
Fine. I could see that standard if you would apply it to your own party. Where is your condemnation of Trump for the deaths caused by his rally? He was every bit as responsible for the insurrection as BLM was for that shooter. He invited people. He fed them lies about the election. He told them they could take their country back (there was literally nothing they could do to stop the election at that point, only delay it).
If you're going to condemn BLM, then you HAVE to condemn Trump.
Bro it's total BS when they grandstand and then turn on 21 savage rapping about having his ops ready to gun down anyone that messes with his drug empire.
For the same reason we aren't talking about Senior-on-Senior murder? It doesn't really happen.Doc Holliday said:So why are we only talking about non segregated murder?BrooksBearLives said:First of all, almost ALL murder is segregated.Doc Holliday said:BLM asserts that racism is their worst enemy when black lives are mostly murdered by other black lives.BrooksBearLives said:There were 3,000 demonstrations last year alone and almost no deaths. BLM has been part of tens of thousands of demonstrations with no death. ONE delusional gunman and you will dismiss BLM?BearlySpeaking said:What is the virus that caused a BLM supporter to murder 5 police officers in Dallas and wound 9 others at a BLM rally? What is the virus that caused mass destruction across America last year and resulted in multiple deaths? What is the signal causing you to want to burn down our cities since Ferguson in 2014, culminating in last year's riots you and your comrades celebrated?jupiter said:
Why there is a double standard
To attempt to answer this question, let me try to draw an analogy to the body's immune system.
"Viruses" (say like communism, fascism) are often the causes of violence.
If a virus invades the body, it will attempt to hijack a (tissue, organ) cell and will begin replicating copies of itself. The infected cell has no real way to defeat the virus on its own, except perhaps through a passive mechanism to recognize the intruder and to turn off its replication mechanisms to prevent them from being hijacked.
For the most part however, the cell relies on the body's immune cells, Killer T-Cells, B-Cells (and others) to be able to recognize and destroy the virus.
Different "viruses" will often try to trick the immune system to over react and either attack itself, turn off an immune response entirely, or to fool T-Cells into attacking healthy cells in the body.
Different people have different jobs/roles to play in society, just like these different cells do.
Since different people serve different purposes in society and posses different tools to fight "infection",and are susceptible to infection by different types of viruses to varying degrees, we shouldn't judge them on the basis that we think they should all act the same way in the face of an "infection".
Violence is a societal problem that effects the health of the whole system/ body.
The burden of ending certain types of violence in society therefore weighs more heavily on some over others.
Which brings me back to the point about why there is a double standard.
Some people might really only be able to passively reject violence. Some people may be more prone to/ susceptible to being infected by one type of violence over another. Some people may only support violence based on personal reasons as opposed to someone who supports large scale mass social violence.
Right now the violence that pervades our country is largely due to a fascist virus that is attacking our "Killer T-Cells" and causing our immune response to go haywire.
The signal being secreted that is causing you to want to attack "Democratic" organ cells is a false one, and is being put out by this fascist virus in order to trick you into attacking it. For the most part these cells are healthy and are functioning properly and are not infected, and do not currently require an immune response against them. It is not a true signal from a B-Cell instructing you to do this.
There are only a few infected T-cells that need to be quarantined that are the ones responsible for pushing out copies of this "fascist" virus that really need to be addressed right now. If you are a T-Cell, that's the true signal from your body's B-Cells you should be listening to. This is what will allow us to get healthy and end this sickness that is plaguing us right now.
Fine. I could see that standard if you would apply it to your own party. Where is your condemnation of Trump for the deaths caused by his rally? He was every bit as responsible for the insurrection as BLM was for that shooter. He invited people. He fed them lies about the election. He told them they could take their country back (there was literally nothing they could do to stop the election at that point, only delay it).
If you're going to condemn BLM, then you HAVE to condemn Trump.
Bro it's total BS when they grandstand and then turn on 21 savage rapping about having his ops ready to gun down anyone that messes with his drug empire.
You don't actually care about murder or crime. You care about a specific sort of crime that backs up a racist narrative that confirms your bias.
Black-on-black crime is literally ignoring white-on-white crime which is 1. more abundant, and 2. more deadly. It's ill-informed and hypocritical at best, and racist most likely. It isn't a difficult concept. Google it.
I would like to direct you here so you can familiarize yourself with the stats on murder and violent crime in general: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/table-43BrooksBearLives said:For the same reason we aren't talking about Senior-on-Senior murder? It doesn't really happen.Doc Holliday said:So why are we only talking about non segregated murder?BrooksBearLives said:First of all, almost ALL murder is segregated.Doc Holliday said:BLM asserts that racism is their worst enemy when black lives are mostly murdered by other black lives.BrooksBearLives said:There were 3,000 demonstrations last year alone and almost no deaths. BLM has been part of tens of thousands of demonstrations with no death. ONE delusional gunman and you will dismiss BLM?BearlySpeaking said:What is the virus that caused a BLM supporter to murder 5 police officers in Dallas and wound 9 others at a BLM rally? What is the virus that caused mass destruction across America last year and resulted in multiple deaths? What is the signal causing you to want to burn down our cities since Ferguson in 2014, culminating in last year's riots you and your comrades celebrated?jupiter said:
Why there is a double standard
To attempt to answer this question, let me try to draw an analogy to the body's immune system.
"Viruses" (say like communism, fascism) are often the causes of violence.
If a virus invades the body, it will attempt to hijack a (tissue, organ) cell and will begin replicating copies of itself. The infected cell has no real way to defeat the virus on its own, except perhaps through a passive mechanism to recognize the intruder and to turn off its replication mechanisms to prevent them from being hijacked.
For the most part however, the cell relies on the body's immune cells, Killer T-Cells, B-Cells (and others) to be able to recognize and destroy the virus.
Different "viruses" will often try to trick the immune system to over react and either attack itself, turn off an immune response entirely, or to fool T-Cells into attacking healthy cells in the body.
Different people have different jobs/roles to play in society, just like these different cells do.
Since different people serve different purposes in society and posses different tools to fight "infection",and are susceptible to infection by different types of viruses to varying degrees, we shouldn't judge them on the basis that we think they should all act the same way in the face of an "infection".
Violence is a societal problem that effects the health of the whole system/ body.
The burden of ending certain types of violence in society therefore weighs more heavily on some over others.
Which brings me back to the point about why there is a double standard.
Some people might really only be able to passively reject violence. Some people may be more prone to/ susceptible to being infected by one type of violence over another. Some people may only support violence based on personal reasons as opposed to someone who supports large scale mass social violence.
Right now the violence that pervades our country is largely due to a fascist virus that is attacking our "Killer T-Cells" and causing our immune response to go haywire.
The signal being secreted that is causing you to want to attack "Democratic" organ cells is a false one, and is being put out by this fascist virus in order to trick you into attacking it. For the most part these cells are healthy and are functioning properly and are not infected, and do not currently require an immune response against them. It is not a true signal from a B-Cell instructing you to do this.
There are only a few infected T-cells that need to be quarantined that are the ones responsible for pushing out copies of this "fascist" virus that really need to be addressed right now. If you are a T-Cell, that's the true signal from your body's B-Cells you should be listening to. This is what will allow us to get healthy and end this sickness that is plaguing us right now.
Fine. I could see that standard if you would apply it to your own party. Where is your condemnation of Trump for the deaths caused by his rally? He was every bit as responsible for the insurrection as BLM was for that shooter. He invited people. He fed them lies about the election. He told them they could take their country back (there was literally nothing they could do to stop the election at that point, only delay it).
If you're going to condemn BLM, then you HAVE to condemn Trump.
Bro it's total BS when they grandstand and then turn on 21 savage rapping about having his ops ready to gun down anyone that messes with his drug empire.
You don't actually care about murder or crime. You care about a specific sort of crime that backs up a racist narrative that confirms your bias.
Black-on-black crime is literally ignoring white-on-white crime which is 1. more abundant, and 2. more deadly. It's ill-informed and hypocritical at best, and racist most likely. It isn't a difficult concept. Google it.
I agree that white on white crime is a big problem that should be addressed. Defunding and/ or eliminating the police is not one of the solutions.BrooksBearLives said:For the same reason we aren't talking about Senior-on-Senior murder? It doesn't really happen.Doc Holliday said:So why are we only talking about non segregated murder?BrooksBearLives said:First of all, almost ALL murder is segregated.Doc Holliday said:BLM asserts that racism is their worst enemy when black lives are mostly murdered by other black lives.BrooksBearLives said:There were 3,000 demonstrations last year alone and almost no deaths. BLM has been part of tens of thousands of demonstrations with no death. ONE delusional gunman and you will dismiss BLM?BearlySpeaking said:What is the virus that caused a BLM supporter to murder 5 police officers in Dallas and wound 9 others at a BLM rally? What is the virus that caused mass destruction across America last year and resulted in multiple deaths? What is the signal causing you to want to burn down our cities since Ferguson in 2014, culminating in last year's riots you and your comrades celebrated?jupiter said:
Why there is a double standard
To attempt to answer this question, let me try to draw an analogy to the body's immune system.
"Viruses" (say like communism, fascism) are often the causes of violence.
If a virus invades the body, it will attempt to hijack a (tissue, organ) cell and will begin replicating copies of itself. The infected cell has no real way to defeat the virus on its own, except perhaps through a passive mechanism to recognize the intruder and to turn off its replication mechanisms to prevent them from being hijacked.
For the most part however, the cell relies on the body's immune cells, Killer T-Cells, B-Cells (and others) to be able to recognize and destroy the virus.
Different "viruses" will often try to trick the immune system to over react and either attack itself, turn off an immune response entirely, or to fool T-Cells into attacking healthy cells in the body.
Different people have different jobs/roles to play in society, just like these different cells do.
Since different people serve different purposes in society and posses different tools to fight "infection",and are susceptible to infection by different types of viruses to varying degrees, we shouldn't judge them on the basis that we think they should all act the same way in the face of an "infection".
Violence is a societal problem that effects the health of the whole system/ body.
The burden of ending certain types of violence in society therefore weighs more heavily on some over others.
Which brings me back to the point about why there is a double standard.
Some people might really only be able to passively reject violence. Some people may be more prone to/ susceptible to being infected by one type of violence over another. Some people may only support violence based on personal reasons as opposed to someone who supports large scale mass social violence.
Right now the violence that pervades our country is largely due to a fascist virus that is attacking our "Killer T-Cells" and causing our immune response to go haywire.
The signal being secreted that is causing you to want to attack "Democratic" organ cells is a false one, and is being put out by this fascist virus in order to trick you into attacking it. For the most part these cells are healthy and are functioning properly and are not infected, and do not currently require an immune response against them. It is not a true signal from a B-Cell instructing you to do this.
There are only a few infected T-cells that need to be quarantined that are the ones responsible for pushing out copies of this "fascist" virus that really need to be addressed right now. If you are a T-Cell, that's the true signal from your body's B-Cells you should be listening to. This is what will allow us to get healthy and end this sickness that is plaguing us right now.
Fine. I could see that standard if you would apply it to your own party. Where is your condemnation of Trump for the deaths caused by his rally? He was every bit as responsible for the insurrection as BLM was for that shooter. He invited people. He fed them lies about the election. He told them they could take their country back (there was literally nothing they could do to stop the election at that point, only delay it).
If you're going to condemn BLM, then you HAVE to condemn Trump.
Bro it's total BS when they grandstand and then turn on 21 savage rapping about having his ops ready to gun down anyone that messes with his drug empire.
You don't actually care about murder or crime. You care about a specific sort of crime that backs up a racist narrative that confirms your bias.
Black-on-black crime is literally ignoring white-on-white crime which is 1. more abundant, and 2. more deadly. It's ill-informed and hypocritical at best, and racist most likely. It isn't a difficult concept. Google it.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"
-- Barack Obama
-- Barack Obama
muddybrazos said:I would like to direct you here so you can familiarize yourself with the stats on murder and violent crime in general: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/table-43BrooksBearLives said:For the same reason we aren't talking about Senior-on-Senior murder? It doesn't really happen.Doc Holliday said:So why are we only talking about non segregated murder?BrooksBearLives said:First of all, almost ALL murder is segregated.Doc Holliday said:BLM asserts that racism is their worst enemy when black lives are mostly murdered by other black lives.BrooksBearLives said:There were 3,000 demonstrations last year alone and almost no deaths. BLM has been part of tens of thousands of demonstrations with no death. ONE delusional gunman and you will dismiss BLM?BearlySpeaking said:What is the virus that caused a BLM supporter to murder 5 police officers in Dallas and wound 9 others at a BLM rally? What is the virus that caused mass destruction across America last year and resulted in multiple deaths? What is the signal causing you to want to burn down our cities since Ferguson in 2014, culminating in last year's riots you and your comrades celebrated?jupiter said:
Why there is a double standard
To attempt to answer this question, let me try to draw an analogy to the body's immune system.
"Viruses" (say like communism, fascism) are often the causes of violence.
If a virus invades the body, it will attempt to hijack a (tissue, organ) cell and will begin replicating copies of itself. The infected cell has no real way to defeat the virus on its own, except perhaps through a passive mechanism to recognize the intruder and to turn off its replication mechanisms to prevent them from being hijacked.
For the most part however, the cell relies on the body's immune cells, Killer T-Cells, B-Cells (and others) to be able to recognize and destroy the virus.
Different "viruses" will often try to trick the immune system to over react and either attack itself, turn off an immune response entirely, or to fool T-Cells into attacking healthy cells in the body.
Different people have different jobs/roles to play in society, just like these different cells do.
Since different people serve different purposes in society and posses different tools to fight "infection",and are susceptible to infection by different types of viruses to varying degrees, we shouldn't judge them on the basis that we think they should all act the same way in the face of an "infection".
Violence is a societal problem that effects the health of the whole system/ body.
The burden of ending certain types of violence in society therefore weighs more heavily on some over others.
Which brings me back to the point about why there is a double standard.
Some people might really only be able to passively reject violence. Some people may be more prone to/ susceptible to being infected by one type of violence over another. Some people may only support violence based on personal reasons as opposed to someone who supports large scale mass social violence.
Right now the violence that pervades our country is largely due to a fascist virus that is attacking our "Killer T-Cells" and causing our immune response to go haywire.
The signal being secreted that is causing you to want to attack "Democratic" organ cells is a false one, and is being put out by this fascist virus in order to trick you into attacking it. For the most part these cells are healthy and are functioning properly and are not infected, and do not currently require an immune response against them. It is not a true signal from a B-Cell instructing you to do this.
There are only a few infected T-cells that need to be quarantined that are the ones responsible for pushing out copies of this "fascist" virus that really need to be addressed right now. If you are a T-Cell, that's the true signal from your body's B-Cells you should be listening to. This is what will allow us to get healthy and end this sickness that is plaguing us right now.
Fine. I could see that standard if you would apply it to your own party. Where is your condemnation of Trump for the deaths caused by his rally? He was every bit as responsible for the insurrection as BLM was for that shooter. He invited people. He fed them lies about the election. He told them they could take their country back (there was literally nothing they could do to stop the election at that point, only delay it).
If you're going to condemn BLM, then you HAVE to condemn Trump.
Bro it's total BS when they grandstand and then turn on 21 savage rapping about having his ops ready to gun down anyone that messes with his drug empire.
You don't actually care about murder or crime. You care about a specific sort of crime that backs up a racist narrative that confirms your bias.
Black-on-black crime is literally ignoring white-on-white crime which is 1. more abundant, and 2. more deadly. It's ill-informed and hypocritical at best, and racist most likely. It isn't a difficult concept. Google it.
^^^ With blacks being only 12% of population they really overachieve in robbery and murdering
Really need to promote black dads getting back in homes
this thread is 100% proof y'all are whack jobs.
Wow.
Wow.
We been knew.BrooksBearLives said:
this thread is 100% proof y'all are whack jobs.
Wow.
Shippou said:We been knew.BrooksBearLives said:
this thread is 100% proof y'all are whack jobs.
Wow.
But Antifa is just an idea.
Antifa is a real thing, it has leadership at local levels, there's no national antifa, can confirm that.whiterock said:Shippou said:We been knew.BrooksBearLives said:
this thread is 100% proof y'all are whack jobs.
Wow.
But Antifa is just an idea.
Is there a national objective or are objectives determined by local "cells"?Shippou said:Antifa is a real thing, it has leadership at local levels, there's no national antifa, can confirm that.whiterock said:Shippou said:We been knew.BrooksBearLives said:
this thread is 100% proof y'all are whack jobs.
Wow.
But Antifa is just an idea.
LOL. Antifa is a classic cellular insurgency with organizations all over the world engaging in politically motivated violence, pursuing anarcho-marxist objectives. Same tactics, same message, same goals.57Bear said:Is there a national objective or are objectives determined by local "cells"?Shippou said:Antifa is a real thing, it has leadership at local levels, there's no national antifa, can confirm that.whiterock said:Shippou said:We been knew.BrooksBearLives said:
this thread is 100% proof y'all are whack jobs.
Wow.
But Antifa is just an idea.
But no coordination, we are told.
They effectively dominate a few US cities, from time to time actually seizing and holding territory in a couple of them (with acquiescence of sympathetic progressive local municipalities). They individually join in legal political action organized by groups like Black Lives matter, which opens the gateway for their members to be funded by funded by Act Blue.
They are the Democrat militias, funded by Democrat crowd funding mechanisms, attacking the foundations of our Republic, controlled only by the availability of funds, promoted by elected Democrats at local levels, promoted by Democrats at the national level.
They are principled, but overly zealous from time to time.
They are not the problem, we are told.
White supremacy is the most dire threat to the Republic, we are told.
LOL.
You are ****ing nuts. Certifiable.whiterock said:LOL. Antifa is a classic cellular insurgency with organizations all over the world engaging in politically motivated violence, pursuing anarcho-marxist objectives. Same tactics, same message, same goals.57Bear said:Is there a national objective or are objectives determined by local "cells"?Shippou said:Antifa is a real thing, it has leadership at local levels, there's no national antifa, can confirm that.whiterock said:Shippou said:We been knew.BrooksBearLives said:
this thread is 100% proof y'all are whack jobs.
Wow.
But Antifa is just an idea.
But no coordination, we are told.
They effectively dominate a few US cities, from time to time actually seizing and holding territory in a couple of them (with acquiescence of sympathetic progressive local municipalities). They individually join in legal political action organized by groups like Black Lives matter, which opens the gateway for their members to be funded by funded by Act Blue.
They are the Democrat militias, funded by Democrat crowd funding mechanisms, attacking the foundations of our Republic, controlled only by the availability of funds, promoted by elected Democrats at local levels, promoted by Democrats at the national level.
They are principled, but overly zealous from time to time.
They are not the problem, we are told.
White supremacy is the most dire threat to the Republic, we are told.
LOL.
EVERYONE IS IN ON THE DEEP STATE ANTIFA COLLUSION!!! The FBI Director (a Republican nominated by Trump) has said time and again that ANTIFA isn't a threat. BUT YOU KNOW BETTER!
I have to tell you. You are crazy if you believe that. And not in "fun and zany" way.
If you REALLY think that the Democrats are simultaneously so stupid that they can't run a country, but so incredibly sophisticated that they can direct a deep state ring of cellular ANTIFA under the FBI and CIA's noses without any proof... you need to commit yourself to an institution.
You imputed deep state. It's not nearly that complicated. it's right out in the open, compliant with quarterly IRS and FEC fillings.BrooksBearLives said:You are ****ing nuts. Certifiable.whiterock said:LOL. Antifa is a classic cellular insurgency with organizations all over the world engaging in politically motivated violence, pursuing anarcho-marxist objectives. Same tactics, same message, same goals.57Bear said:Is there a national objective or are objectives determined by local "cells"?Shippou said:Antifa is a real thing, it has leadership at local levels, there's no national antifa, can confirm that.whiterock said:Shippou said:We been knew.BrooksBearLives said:
this thread is 100% proof y'all are whack jobs.
Wow.
But Antifa is just an idea.
But no coordination, we are told.
They effectively dominate a few US cities, from time to time actually seizing and holding territory in a couple of them (with acquiescence of sympathetic progressive local municipalities). They individually join in legal political action organized by groups like Black Lives matter, which opens the gateway for their members to be funded by funded by Act Blue.
They are the Democrat militias, funded by Democrat crowd funding mechanisms, attacking the foundations of our Republic, controlled only by the availability of funds, promoted by elected Democrats at local levels, promoted by Democrats at the national level.
They are principled, but overly zealous from time to time.
They are not the problem, we are told.
White supremacy is the most dire threat to the Republic, we are told.
LOL.
EVERYONE IS IN ON THE DEEP STATE ANTIFA COLLUSION!!! The FBI Director (a Republican nominated by Trump) has said time and again that ANTIFA isn't a threat. BUT YOU KNOW BETTER!
I have to tell you. You are crazy if you believe that. And not in "fun and zany" way.
If you REALLY think that the Democrats are simultaneously so stupid that they can't run a country, but so incredibly sophisticated that they can direct a deep state ring of cellular ANTIFA under the FBI and CIA's noses without any proof... you need to commit yourself to an institution.
You do know what ActBlue is, don't you?
You do know the VPOTUS raised money to bail out rioters during an election year, don't you?
You do know about paid protesting, don't you?
How they heck do Antifa folks keep rioting every night, getting arrested and bailed out in time to protest the next night, have soup kitchens, designated camping areas, rental vans & plane tickets.....? How the heck do these guys make a living, get the money to travel from state to state? How does this Democrat militia keep at it? Every night? Attacking federal facilities. Attacking federal officers. Hand to hand combat with state & local police. But nah....that's not insurrection or anything. Why, that's just principled people getting a bit overzealous. Got it.
ActBlue funds are funneled thru organizations than end up paying protesters who are BLM by day and Antifa by night. No sane bureaucrat would call that out, and a huge number of them (SEIU members or social justice warriors, or both) are sympathetic.
None of this is not terribly complicated at all.
I use to see these kinds of operations up close & personal, abroad, while working for the taxpayer.
Money & muscle for street action.....
I just feel kinda silly for a large part of my life thinking it couldn't happen here.
The problem is not that Democrats are stupid and couldn't run a country. It's that they aren't interested in running a country. They are running a revolution. A cultural revolution, specifically.
Tyranny lives on BOTH ends of the spectrum, buddy. You can conjure and lose all the sleep you want about white supremacy, or capitol riots. But it's the left that's been burning cities for the last year. You can howl with outrage about how politically incorrect it is to lay out the dots. But it is what it is. Antifa is in early Stage 2 Maoist insurgency. Straight from the handbook. Every damned night.
Don't deny it. It's working in your direction. Enjoy it!
whiterock said:You imputed deep state. It's not nearly that complicated. it's right out in the open, compliant with quarterly IRS and FEC fillings.BrooksBearLives said:You are ****ing nuts. Certifiable.whiterock said:LOL. Antifa is a classic cellular insurgency with organizations all over the world engaging in politically motivated violence, pursuing anarcho-marxist objectives. Same tactics, same message, same goals.57Bear said:Is there a national objective or are objectives determined by local "cells"?Shippou said:Antifa is a real thing, it has leadership at local levels, there's no national antifa, can confirm that.whiterock said:Shippou said:We been knew.BrooksBearLives said:
this thread is 100% proof y'all are whack jobs.
Wow.
But Antifa is just an idea.
But no coordination, we are told.
They effectively dominate a few US cities, from time to time actually seizing and holding territory in a couple of them (with acquiescence of sympathetic progressive local municipalities). They individually join in legal political action organized by groups like Black Lives matter, which opens the gateway for their members to be funded by funded by Act Blue.
They are the Democrat militias, funded by Democrat crowd funding mechanisms, attacking the foundations of our Republic, controlled only by the availability of funds, promoted by elected Democrats at local levels, promoted by Democrats at the national level.
They are principled, but overly zealous from time to time.
They are not the problem, we are told.
White supremacy is the most dire threat to the Republic, we are told.
LOL.
EVERYONE IS IN ON THE DEEP STATE ANTIFA COLLUSION!!! The FBI Director (a Republican nominated by Trump) has said time and again that ANTIFA isn't a threat. BUT YOU KNOW BETTER!
I have to tell you. You are crazy if you believe that. And not in "fun and zany" way.
If you REALLY think that the Democrats are simultaneously so stupid that they can't run a country, but so incredibly sophisticated that they can direct a deep state ring of cellular ANTIFA under the FBI and CIA's noses without any proof... you need to commit yourself to an institution.
You do know what ActBlue is, don't you?
You do know the VPOTUS raised money to bail out rioters during an election year, don't you?
You do know about paid protesting, don't you?
How they heck do Antifa folks keep rioting every night, getting arrested and bailed out in time to protest the next night, have soup kitchens, designated camping areas, rental vans & plane tickets.....? How the heck do these guys make a living, get the money to travel from state to state? How does this Democrat militia keep at it? Every night? Attacking federal facilities. Attacking federal officers. Hand to hand combat with state & local police. But nah....that's not insurrection or anything. Why, that's just principled people getting a bit overzealous. Got it.
ActBlue funds are funneled thru organizations than end up paying protesters who are BLM by day and Antifa by night. No sane bureaucrat would call that out, and a huge number of them (SEIU members or social justice warriors, or both) are sympathetic.
None of this is not terribly complicated at all.
I use to see these kinds of operations up close & personal, abroad, while working for the taxpayer.
Money & muscle for street action.....
I just feel kinda silly for a large part of my life thinking it couldn't happen here.
The problem is not that Democrats are stupid and couldn't run a country. It's that they aren't interested in running a country. They are running a revolution. A cultural revolution, specifically.
Tyranny lives on BOTH ends of the spectrum, buddy. You can conjure and lose all the sleep you want about white supremacy, or capitol riots. But it's the left that's been burning cities for the last year. You can howl with outrage about how politically incorrect it is to lay out the dots. But it is what it is. Antifa is in early Stage 2 Maoist insurgency. Straight from the handbook. Every damned night.
Don't deny it. It's working in your direction. Enjoy it!
So, does Elvis seem like he knows what he's talking about when he tells you these things?
I'm sure there is someone out there who doesn't see how completely full of **** you are. There's always a dumber person. You throw out aspersions as if they were true, but I know they aren't. "Cities were burning" **** you. There were thousands of demonstrations associated with BLM alone last summer and 97% of them went off without a hitch -literally not one arrest.
But scared little people like you were mainlining FoxNews and NewsMax and your uncle Larry's blog and only seeing what confirms your fears. You're simple like that.
"IRS filings" **** you. I'm sure your "sources" summarized it for you really nicely while you were doing your "research."
If there was anything real about ANTIFA, we would know. The very idea is catnip to the morons Trump put in charge. If there was ONE credible plot for anything near real violence at their hands, it would be running on a loop at FoxNews. Or maybe not. The Dr Seuss story was pretty hard hitting journalism. And thank GOD that Mr Potatohead subject was covered so completely!
You're a joke.
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe can happen here.
BrooksBearLives said:You are ****ing nuts. Certifiable.whiterock said:LOL. Antifa is a classic cellular insurgency with organizations all over the world engaging in politically motivated violence, pursuing anarcho-marxist objectives. Same tactics, same message, same goals.57Bear said:Is there a national objective or are objectives determined by local "cells"?Shippou said:Antifa is a real thing, it has leadership at local levels, there's no national antifa, can confirm that.whiterock said:Shippou said:We been knew.BrooksBearLives said:
this thread is 100% proof y'all are whack jobs.
Wow.
But Antifa is just an idea.
But no coordination, we are told.
They effectively dominate a few US cities, from time to time actually seizing and holding territory in a couple of them (with acquiescence of sympathetic progressive local municipalities). They individually join in legal political action organized by groups like Black Lives matter, which opens the gateway for their members to be funded by funded by Act Blue.
They are the Democrat militias, funded by Democrat crowd funding mechanisms, attacking the foundations of our Republic, controlled only by the availability of funds, promoted by elected Democrats at local levels, promoted by Democrats at the national level.
They are principled, but overly zealous from time to time.
They are not the problem, we are told.
White supremacy is the most dire threat to the Republic, we are told.
LOL.
EVERYONE IS IN ON THE DEEP STATE ANTIFA COLLUSION!!! The FBI Director (a Republican nominated by Trump) has said time and again that ANTIFA isn't a threat. BUT YOU KNOW BETTER!
I have to tell you. You are crazy if you believe that. And not in "fun and zany" way.
If you REALLY think that the Democrats are simultaneously so stupid that they can't run a country, but so incredibly sophisticated that they can direct a deep state ring of cellular ANTIFA under the FBI and CIA's noses without any proof... you need to commit yourself to an institution.
Really too dam bad this dickbump of a human raised its' pus head again
Sam Lowry said:
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe is happening here on a much greater scale.
Fify
Really? Because I don't see any reeducation camps going on, and Chairman Mao hasn't rose from the grave to come kill all the landlords yet.Florda_mike said:Sam Lowry said:
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe is happening here on a much greater scale.
Fify
Gross over exaggeration on your part to think anything even closely resembling either of those two revolutions is happening in this country.
Shippou said:Really? Because I don't see any reeducation camps going on, and Chairman Mao hasn't rose from the grave to come kill all the landlords yet.Florda_mike said:Sam Lowry said:
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe is happening here on a much greater scale.
Fify
Gross over exaggeration on your part to think anything even closely resembling either of those two revolutions is happening in this country.
Well, you are a Marxist and should know what it should look like
Or maybe you don't know what the beginnings of communism resembles
Take speech away ..... check
Take guns away ..... working on it
Lock em in homes .... check
Make people fear, even each other ... check
Force people to take untested meds, eventually they'll voluntarily kill themselves ... check
Turn people to sheep ..... check
Make em fear government ..... check
Cancel those that disobey..... check
There's more but surely you can see a path we're on from that?
None of that resembles how communisms "starts".Florda_mike said:Shippou said:Really? Because I don't see any reeducation camps going on, and Chairman Mao hasn't rose from the grave to come kill all the landlords yet.Florda_mike said:Sam Lowry said:
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe is happening here on a much greater scale.
Fify
Gross over exaggeration on your part to think anything even closely resembling either of those two revolutions is happening in this country.
Well, you are a Marxist and should know what it should look like
Or maybe you don't know what the beginnings of communism resembles
Take speech away ..... check
Take guns away ..... working on it
Lock em in homes .... check
Make people fear, even each other ... check
Force people to take untested meds, eventually they'll voluntarily kill themselves ... check
Turn people to sheep ..... check
Make em fear government ..... check
Cancel those that disobey..... check
There's more but surely you can see a path we're on from that?
Take speech away? You're free to say whatever you want, there's always consequences to what you say though, whether it's from the government or those who disagree with you.
Take guns away?? in the USSR you were allowed to own guns, the only communist place I can think of that "took" guns away was China in 1966.
Lock them in homes?? It's a pandemic, I'd hate to see what you'd be like in 1347 Italy while the plague was ravaging people. Also that's really draconian, nobody has "locked" anyone in their homes. I understand certain parts of the country still have ridiculous lockdowns for some reason, but I don't live there so ohh well.
I'm not gonna get into it with you on vaccines, other people with more knowledge than me have done so and I've seen how those attempts go.
Sheep? Looooooooool, how is anyone a sheep??
Fear the government? What is there to fear? I don't live in your world so I'm wondering what is there to be afraid of other than the obvious?? You should never trust the state, but fear them?? That's funny.
Cancel... Cancel culture?? Cancel culture doesn't exist.
Shippou said:Really? Because I don't see any reeducation camps going on, and Chairman Mao hasn't rose from the grave to come kill all the landlords yet.Florda_mike said:Sam Lowry said:
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe is happening here on a much greater scale.
Fify
Post of the week.
~Regretfully Yours, The Pronoun Lady~
"China and Europe"Sam Lowry said:
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe can happen here.
Vague hand-waiving at far-off places may work on the galaxy-brained, xenophobic gomers that usually post on this board, but I'm going to have to ask you to be more specific.
What history did you "watch happen" in China and Europe that applies to now? What events specifically?
Maoism and cultural revolution in China. Leninism in Russia. Fascism in Germany and Italy. The Spanish Civil War.BrooksBearLives said:"China and Europe"Sam Lowry said:
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe can happen here.
Vague hand-waiving at far-off places may work on the galaxy-brained, xenophobic gomers that usually post on this board, but I'm going to have to ask you to be more specific.
What history did you "watch happen" in China and Europe that applies to now? What events specifically?
You "watched" those happen?Sam Lowry said:Maoism and cultural revolution in China. Leninism in Russia. Fascism in Germany and Italy. The Spanish Civil War.BrooksBearLives said:"China and Europe"Sam Lowry said:
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe can happen here.
Vague hand-waiving at far-off places may work on the galaxy-brained, xenophobic gomers that usually post on this board, but I'm going to have to ask you to be more specific.
What history did you "watch happen" in China and Europe that applies to now? What events specifically?
How old are you? Come on, man. You didn't watch that happen. You read about it or heard about it and now you're sloppily associating them with "now." You're better than that.
We had an insurrection of our ****ING GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO STEAL AN ELECTION BASED ON LIES told by one party of lemmings who have been convinced that minorities/liberals/gays/trans athletes/Dr. Seuss cancel-culture are the problem.
And not the people killing police and claiming space lasers are to blame for forest fires.
I did not mean to imply that I'd watched all of history unfold in real time. Sorry for any confusion there.BrooksBearLives said:You "watched" those happen?Sam Lowry said:Maoism and cultural revolution in China. Leninism in Russia. Fascism in Germany and Italy. The Spanish Civil War.BrooksBearLives said:"China and Europe"Sam Lowry said:
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe can happen here.
Vague hand-waiving at far-off places may work on the galaxy-brained, xenophobic gomers that usually post on this board, but I'm going to have to ask you to be more specific.
What history did you "watch happen" in China and Europe that applies to now? What events specifically?
How old are you? Come on, man. You didn't watch that happen. You read about it or heard about it and now you're sloppily associating them with "now." You're better than that.
We had an insurrection of our ****ING GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO STEAL AN ELECTION BASED ON LIES told by one party of lemmings who have been convinced that minorities/liberals/gays/trans athletes/Dr. Seuss cancel-culture are the problem.
And not the people killing police and claiming space lasers are to blame for forest fires.
You implied you had a full understanding of all the events -which I would challenge on an epistemological basis alone. That's what I found ridiculous.Sam Lowry said:I did not mean to imply that I'd watched all of history unfold in real time. Sorry for any confusion there.BrooksBearLives said:You "watched" those happen?Sam Lowry said:Maoism and cultural revolution in China. Leninism in Russia. Fascism in Germany and Italy. The Spanish Civil War.BrooksBearLives said:"China and Europe"Sam Lowry said:
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe can happen here.
Vague hand-waiving at far-off places may work on the galaxy-brained, xenophobic gomers that usually post on this board, but I'm going to have to ask you to be more specific.
What history did you "watch happen" in China and Europe that applies to now? What events specifically?
How old are you? Come on, man. You didn't watch that happen. You read about it or heard about it and now you're sloppily associating them with "now." You're better than that.
We had an insurrection of our ****ING GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO STEAL AN ELECTION BASED ON LIES told by one party of lemmings who have been convinced that minorities/liberals/gays/trans athletes/Dr. Seuss cancel-culture are the problem.
And not the people killing police and claiming space lasers are to blame for forest fires.
I find you to be pretty thoughtful. I'm sincerely curious. What about current events reminds you of your knowledge of the rise of fascism in Italy?
Thanks, Brooks. I'll have to continue this tomorrow...looking forward to talking.BrooksBearLives said:You implied you had a full understanding of all the events -which I would challenge on an epistemological basis alone. That's what I found ridiculous.Sam Lowry said:I did not mean to imply that I'd watched all of history unfold in real time. Sorry for any confusion there.BrooksBearLives said:You "watched" those happen?Sam Lowry said:Maoism and cultural revolution in China. Leninism in Russia. Fascism in Germany and Italy. The Spanish Civil War.BrooksBearLives said:"China and Europe"Sam Lowry said:
I don't watch NewsMax, but I do watch history. What happened in China and Europe can happen here.
Vague hand-waiving at far-off places may work on the galaxy-brained, xenophobic gomers that usually post on this board, but I'm going to have to ask you to be more specific.
What history did you "watch happen" in China and Europe that applies to now? What events specifically?
How old are you? Come on, man. You didn't watch that happen. You read about it or heard about it and now you're sloppily associating them with "now." You're better than that.
We had an insurrection of our ****ING GOVERNMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO STEAL AN ELECTION BASED ON LIES told by one party of lemmings who have been convinced that minorities/liberals/gays/trans athletes/Dr. Seuss cancel-culture are the problem.
And not the people killing police and claiming space lasers are to blame for forest fires.
I find you to be pretty thoughtful. I'm sincerely curious. What about current events reminds you of your knowledge of the rise of fascism in Italy?
So there were several years of unrest in the form of strikes and land occupations by anarchist and socialist groups, which resemble current movements like Antifa. These were eventually repressed by right-wing militias, which also have their present-day analogues. Neither side is as well organized yet, but their ideas and methods are similar. Of course there are differences. Racism wasn't an important part of Italian fascism like it is with the American alt-right. Germany is a better comparison in that sense. As Whiterock alluded to, Chinese revolutionaries started by occupying small pieces of land and slowly expanding their influence. On the cultural front, they focused on destroying the relics of the past in order to purge any memory of traditional ways.
We're starting to invoke tactics similar to struggle sessions from China and the Soviet Union, eliminating and rewriting history similar to year zero tactics, and conditioning people to spy and report on each other like East Germany. No Marxist/communist revolution or change looked the same. Russia didn't happen like Eastern Europe didn't happen like China didn't happen like Cuba didn't happen like Vietnam or Cambodia nor Nicaragua, etc. One common factor Is they all eventually had regional armed, violent, and many times bloody skirmishes that evolved to large scale conflict. Let's hope our apparent acceptance of constant rioting and violent "protest" isn't that symbolic precursor. Given some of the rhetoric and ideology of the perpetrators, you can't help but wonder.
This is such an absurdly ridiculous take.BrooksBearLives said:Holy ****, that's so ****ing racist.Doc Holliday said:BLM asserts that racism is their worst enemy when black lives are mostly murdered by other black lives.BrooksBearLives said:There were 3,000 demonstrations last year alone and almost no deaths. BLM has been part of tens of thousands of demonstrations with no death. ONE delusional gunman and you will dismiss BLM?BearlySpeaking said:What is the virus that caused a BLM supporter to murder 5 police officers in Dallas and wound 9 others at a BLM rally? What is the virus that caused mass destruction across America last year and resulted in multiple deaths? What is the signal causing you to want to burn down our cities since Ferguson in 2014, culminating in last year's riots you and your comrades celebrated?jupiter said:
Why there is a double standard
To attempt to answer this question, let me try to draw an analogy to the body's immune system.
"Viruses" (say like communism, fascism) are often the causes of violence.
If a virus invades the body, it will attempt to hijack a (tissue, organ) cell and will begin replicating copies of itself. The infected cell has no real way to defeat the virus on its own, except perhaps through a passive mechanism to recognize the intruder and to turn off its replication mechanisms to prevent them from being hijacked.
For the most part however, the cell relies on the body's immune cells, Killer T-Cells, B-Cells (and others) to be able to recognize and destroy the virus.
Different "viruses" will often try to trick the immune system to over react and either attack itself, turn off an immune response entirely, or to fool T-Cells into attacking healthy cells in the body.
Different people have different jobs/roles to play in society, just like these different cells do.
Since different people serve different purposes in society and posses different tools to fight "infection",and are susceptible to infection by different types of viruses to varying degrees, we shouldn't judge them on the basis that we think they should all act the same way in the face of an "infection".
Violence is a societal problem that effects the health of the whole system/ body.
The burden of ending certain types of violence in society therefore weighs more heavily on some over others.
Which brings me back to the point about why there is a double standard.
Some people might really only be able to passively reject violence. Some people may be more prone to/ susceptible to being infected by one type of violence over another. Some people may only support violence based on personal reasons as opposed to someone who supports large scale mass social violence.
Right now the violence that pervades our country is largely due to a fascist virus that is attacking our "Killer T-Cells" and causing our immune response to go haywire.
The signal being secreted that is causing you to want to attack "Democratic" organ cells is a false one, and is being put out by this fascist virus in order to trick you into attacking it. For the most part these cells are healthy and are functioning properly and are not infected, and do not currently require an immune response against them. It is not a true signal from a B-Cell instructing you to do this.
There are only a few infected T-cells that need to be quarantined that are the ones responsible for pushing out copies of this "fascist" virus that really need to be addressed right now. If you are a T-Cell, that's the true signal from your body's B-Cells you should be listening to. This is what will allow us to get healthy and end this sickness that is plaguing us right now.
Fine. I could see that standard if you would apply it to your own party. Where is your condemnation of Trump for the deaths caused by his rally? He was every bit as responsible for the insurrection as BLM was for that shooter. He invited people. He fed them lies about the election. He told them they could take their country back (there was literally nothing they could do to stop the election at that point, only delay it).
If you're going to condemn BLM, then you HAVE to condemn Trump.
Bro it's total BS when they grandstand and then turn on 21 savage rapping about having his ops ready to gun down anyone that messes with his drug empire.
First of all, almost ALL murder is segregated. Are you going to talk about "white on white" crime? Where you at? Black on black crime isn't a thing anymore than "yellow on yellow" or "idiot on idiot" crime is.
You want the stats? I'll show you the stats.
And artists reflect the world they're in. If you think it's the other way around, then how many men in Reno did you shoot just to watch them die?
I can tell you don't spend a lot of time with people who don't agree with you because your arguments are absolute *****
The whole BLM movement is BASED on a form of white on black violence. But all of the sudden black on black crime is not a thing??
If race-on-race crime is not a thing, then you might want to alert the FBI, because they keep stats on it.
It's so ridiculous, the denial here in order to control the narrative. Ridiculous, but typical.
Brooks Bear is dumber than even me and I've got CTE.
Damn!
He/she is entertaining though.
Damn!
He/she is entertaining though.
"The education of a man is never completed until he dies." - General Robert E. Lee