Today it is the far-left. In a few years it will be mainstream as kids are being taught it's completely normal and they should feel guilty for not saying it's normal. Gender Dysphoria will not even be recognized soon.Proud 1992 Alum said:
Having gender dysphoria isn't necessarily disqualifying. But not seeking medical help, embracing the delusion that you are a woman, and expecting everyone to ignore reality should be disqualifying for a high level position. Especially in a healthcare role. Biden nominated him to check the box of first transgender nominee for a Senate-confirmed position. Pandering to the far-left base.
Biden's ****** Pushes Puberty Blockers
13,737 Views |
105 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by NeuroticBear
LIB,MR BEARS said:Today it is the far-left. In a few years it will be mainstream as kids are being taught it's completely normal and they should feel guilty for not saying it's normal. Gender Dysphoria will not even be recognized soon.Proud 1992 Alum said:
Having gender dysphoria isn't necessarily disqualifying. But not seeking medical help, embracing the delusion that you are a woman, and expecting everyone to ignore reality should be disqualifying for a high level position. Especially in a healthcare role. Biden nominated him to check the box of first transgender nominee for a Senate-confirmed position. Pandering to the far-left base.
I am not sure it's recognized now.
Well at least we know where the Church Lady has been hiding and she's put on a few lbs.Thee University said:BikerBear said:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate The National Pulse Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as affiliation with a known questionable group, and a few failed fact checks.
Do you like my scarf?
Questionable source? Multiple sources. The new face of the Democrat party has emerged. A TRANsformation!
Forest Bueller_bf said:Well at least we know where the Church Lady has been hiding and she's put on a few lbs.Thee University said:BikerBear said:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate The National Pulse Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as affiliation with a known questionable group, and a few failed fact checks.
Do you like my scarf?
Questionable source? Multiple sources. The new face of the Democrat party has emerged. A TRANsformation!
Laughed out loud .
Well done .
Is there another country that panders and lays down for these types like the United States does?
Cite?Mothra said:I don't know. People with mental illnesses are not allowed to own firearms or serve in the armed forces. Is it that much more bigoted to prevent them from heading the U.S. Health Dept.?quash said:Mothra said:Hilarious is you claiming to be libertarian.quash said:Mothra said:Nah, we don't need that, but we do need to let them have govt. funds to spread their propaganda, right? That's the "libertarian" position on perversion, according to quash.quash said:Mothra said:quash said:ATL Bear said:Well that's much worse....quash said:ATL Bear said:And to think, Betsy De Vos was lambasted for promoting Charter Schools.Jack and DP said:
Sec. DeVos was lambasted for having zero experience with public education.
Yeah, it is.
A person with mental illness running the health dept worse than an inexperienced education secretary.
Only in quash's world.
Having a Department of Perversion Prevention, only in Mothra's government.
Well, his name is Legion so he has company.
You're hilarious.
When you're posting about Libertarian issues "hilarious" is apropos.
Libertarians could do with less Cabinet level power blocs.
But as long as we have them Libertarians would not use a mental illness as a bigoted litmus test to prevent one of the fifty million Americans with a mental illness to serve.
Here's mine.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
There are 50 million adult Americans with mental illness. Perhaps you would force Gov. Abbott out of his job because he's physically disabled?LIB,MR BEARS said:And there lies a great example of why a libertarian will seldom if ever get elected to a position that matters. The inability to see what things can impact job performance vs things that don't (or maybe it's the choice not to see) make all the good things about libertarianism null and void.quash said:Mothra said:Hilarious is you claiming to be libertarian.quash said:Mothra said:Nah, we don't need that, but we do need to let them have govt. funds to spread their propaganda, right? That's the "libertarian" position on perversion, according to quash.quash said:Mothra said:quash said:ATL Bear said:Well that's much worse....quash said:ATL Bear said:And to think, Betsy De Vos was lambasted for promoting Charter Schools.Jack and DP said:
Sec. DeVos was lambasted for having zero experience with public education.
Yeah, it is.
A person with mental illness running the health dept worse than an inexperienced education secretary.
Only in quash's world.
Having a Department of Perversion Prevention, only in Mothra's government.
Well, his name is Legion so he has company.
You're hilarious.
When you're posting about Libertarian issues "hilarious" is apropos.
Libertarians could do with less Cabinet level power blocs.
But as long as we have them Libertarians would not use a mental illness as a bigoted litmus test to prevent one of the fifty million Americans with a mental illness to serve.
No? Because it doesn't affect his ability to perform his job.
If this nominee cannot perform the job because of her mental illness then make that case. So far all I'm hearing is that anyone with mental illness is automatically disqualified.
Instead of discussing the merits of the nominee we get memes and blanket job denial based on a health condition that affects people we all know and love who, somehow, manage to hold down their own jobs in all kinds of positions.
Edit: and yes, Libertarians believe in giving people the freedom to do their job, and in giving employers the right to decide who they hire. We also believe businesses can refuse to serve certain people. If a business hangs a sign that says "Mentally ill not welcome here" then you can shop there all you want. But I'm not going anywhere my loved ones can't go.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Robert Wilson said:
Peoples brains aren't even fully developed until their mid 20s.
We need to teach people to calm down, focus on things that are productive, life giving, service to family, friends, etc. and that many people won't really bloom until they're in their mid 20s or so. That's ok.
You start fking with peoples' hormones during puberty because of teenage angst (which is now on steroids because of social media) and you are going to cause all kinds of unnecessary damage.
If you make it all the way through puberty and you still have some kind of gender confusion problem in your mid 20s, then go seek the right kind of help (starting with everything non-physical you can do first).
Well said
Gender dysphoria does make an impact when a person advocates for and is a position to make policy regarding gender dysphoria. It will impact this position.quash said:There are 50 million adult Americans with mental illness. Perhaps you would force Gov. Abbott out of his job because he's physically disabled?LIB,MR BEARS said:And there lies a great example of why a libertarian will seldom if ever get elected to a position that matters. The inability to see what things can impact job performance vs things that don't (or maybe it's the choice not to see) make all the good things about libertarianism null and void.quash said:Mothra said:Hilarious is you claiming to be libertarian.quash said:Mothra said:Nah, we don't need that, but we do need to let them have govt. funds to spread their propaganda, right? That's the "libertarian" position on perversion, according to quash.quash said:Mothra said:quash said:ATL Bear said:Well that's much worse....quash said:ATL Bear said:And to think, Betsy De Vos was lambasted for promoting Charter Schools.Jack and DP said:
Sec. DeVos was lambasted for having zero experience with public education.
Yeah, it is.
A person with mental illness running the health dept worse than an inexperienced education secretary.
Only in quash's world.
Having a Department of Perversion Prevention, only in Mothra's government.
Well, his name is Legion so he has company.
You're hilarious.
When you're posting about Libertarian issues "hilarious" is apropos.
Libertarians could do with less Cabinet level power blocs.
But as long as we have them Libertarians would not use a mental illness as a bigoted litmus test to prevent one of the fifty million Americans with a mental illness to serve.
No? Because it doesn't affect his ability to perform his job.
If this nominee cannot perform the job because of her mental illness then make that case. So far all I'm hearing is that anyone with mental illness is automatically disqualified.
Instead of discussing the merits of the nominee we get memes and blanket job denial based on a health condition that affects people we all know and love who, somehow, manage to hold down their own jobs in all kinds of positions.
Edit: and yes, Libertarians believe in giving people the freedom to do their job, and in giving employers the right to decide who they hire. We also believe businesses can refuse to serve certain people. If a business hangs a sign that says "Mentally ill not welcome here" then you can shop there all you want. But I'm not going anywhere my loved ones can't go.
If Abbott was wanting to be a firefighter, I'd be against it because the wheelchair would be an impediment. As governor, it is not.
What impact?LIB,MR BEARS said:Gender dysphoria does make an impact when a person advocates for and is a position to make policy regarding gender dysphoria. It will impact this position.quash said:There are 50 million adult Americans with mental illness. Perhaps you would force Gov. Abbott out of his job because he's physically disabled?LIB,MR BEARS said:And there lies a great example of why a libertarian will seldom if ever get elected to a position that matters. The inability to see what things can impact job performance vs things that don't (or maybe it's the choice not to see) make all the good things about libertarianism null and void.quash said:Mothra said:Hilarious is you claiming to be libertarian.quash said:Mothra said:Nah, we don't need that, but we do need to let them have govt. funds to spread their propaganda, right? That's the "libertarian" position on perversion, according to quash.quash said:Mothra said:quash said:ATL Bear said:Well that's much worse....quash said:ATL Bear said:And to think, Betsy De Vos was lambasted for promoting Charter Schools.Jack and DP said:
Sec. DeVos was lambasted for having zero experience with public education.
Yeah, it is.
A person with mental illness running the health dept worse than an inexperienced education secretary.
Only in quash's world.
Having a Department of Perversion Prevention, only in Mothra's government.
Well, his name is Legion so he has company.
You're hilarious.
When you're posting about Libertarian issues "hilarious" is apropos.
Libertarians could do with less Cabinet level power blocs.
But as long as we have them Libertarians would not use a mental illness as a bigoted litmus test to prevent one of the fifty million Americans with a mental illness to serve.
No? Because it doesn't affect his ability to perform his job.
If this nominee cannot perform the job because of her mental illness then make that case. So far all I'm hearing is that anyone with mental illness is automatically disqualified.
Instead of discussing the merits of the nominee we get memes and blanket job denial based on a health condition that affects people we all know and love who, somehow, manage to hold down their own jobs in all kinds of positions.
Edit: and yes, Libertarians believe in giving people the freedom to do their job, and in giving employers the right to decide who they hire. We also believe businesses can refuse to serve certain people. If a business hangs a sign that says "Mentally ill not welcome here" then you can shop there all you want. But I'm not going anywhere my loved ones can't go.
If Abbott was wanting to be a firefighter, I'd be against it because the wheelchair would be an impediment. As governor, it is not.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
quash said:What impact?LIB,MR BEARS said:Gender dysphoria does make an impact when a person advocates for and is a position to make policy regarding gender dysphoria. It will impact this position.quash said:There are 50 million adult Americans with mental illness. Perhaps you would force Gov. Abbott out of his job because he's physically disabled?LIB,MR BEARS said:And there lies a great example of why a libertarian will seldom if ever get elected to a position that matters. The inability to see what things can impact job performance vs things that don't (or maybe it's the choice not to see) make all the good things about libertarianism null and void.quash said:Mothra said:Hilarious is you claiming to be libertarian.quash said:Mothra said:Nah, we don't need that, but we do need to let them have govt. funds to spread their propaganda, right? That's the "libertarian" position on perversion, according to quash.quash said:Mothra said:quash said:ATL Bear said:Well that's much worse....quash said:ATL Bear said:And to think, Betsy De Vos was lambasted for promoting Charter Schools.Jack and DP said:
Sec. DeVos was lambasted for having zero experience with public education.
Yeah, it is.
A person with mental illness running the health dept worse than an inexperienced education secretary.
Only in quash's world.
Having a Department of Perversion Prevention, only in Mothra's government.
Well, his name is Legion so he has company.
You're hilarious.
When you're posting about Libertarian issues "hilarious" is apropos.
Libertarians could do with less Cabinet level power blocs.
But as long as we have them Libertarians would not use a mental illness as a bigoted litmus test to prevent one of the fifty million Americans with a mental illness to serve.
No? Because it doesn't affect his ability to perform his job.
If this nominee cannot perform the job because of her mental illness then make that case. So far all I'm hearing is that anyone with mental illness is automatically disqualified.
Instead of discussing the merits of the nominee we get memes and blanket job denial based on a health condition that affects people we all know and love who, somehow, manage to hold down their own jobs in all kinds of positions.
Edit: and yes, Libertarians believe in giving people the freedom to do their job, and in giving employers the right to decide who they hire. We also believe businesses can refuse to serve certain people. If a business hangs a sign that says "Mentally ill not welcome here" then you can shop there all you want. But I'm not going anywhere my loved ones can't go.
If Abbott was wanting to be a firefighter, I'd be against it because the wheelchair would be an impediment. As governor, it is not.
It doesn't automatically have an impact. In this case, it seems that the person is likely to offer a policy agenda where the idea of masking a child's actual sex and trying to make them appear they are the other sex via chemical injections and surgical mutilation is promoted. I don't find that acceptable.
This is the best post on here.Robert Wilson said:
Peoples brains aren't even fully developed until their mid 20s.
We need to teach people to calm down, focus on things that are productive, life giving, service to family, friends, etc. and that many people won't really bloom until they're in their mid 20s or so. That's ok.
You start fking with peoples' hormones during puberty because of teenage angst (which is now on steroids because of social media) and you are going to cause all kinds of unnecessary damage.
If you make it all the way through puberty and you still have some kind of gender confusion problem in your mid 20s, then go seek the right kind of help (starting with everything non-physical you can do first).
Richard has obvious emotional issues, which are shared with others, like Bruce Jenner.
Doesn't mean they aren't nice people, but the underlying issues that cause their self mutilating themselves aren't good.
I wonder if this is really the best person they could find for this position, or they were trying to score additional woke points. Because this wouldn't be Biden's first choice based on race, or gender, or outward physical characteristics, instead of content of character.
DC Bear provided a good answer. I'll stick with his.quash said:What impact?LIB,MR BEARS said:Gender dysphoria does make an impact when a person advocates for and is a position to make policy regarding gender dysphoria. It will impact this position.quash said:There are 50 million adult Americans with mental illness. Perhaps you would force Gov. Abbott out of his job because he's physically disabled?LIB,MR BEARS said:And there lies a great example of why a libertarian will seldom if ever get elected to a position that matters. The inability to see what things can impact job performance vs things that don't (or maybe it's the choice not to see) make all the good things about libertarianism null and void.quash said:Mothra said:Hilarious is you claiming to be libertarian.quash said:Mothra said:Nah, we don't need that, but we do need to let them have govt. funds to spread their propaganda, right? That's the "libertarian" position on perversion, according to quash.quash said:Mothra said:quash said:ATL Bear said:Well that's much worse....quash said:ATL Bear said:And to think, Betsy De Vos was lambasted for promoting Charter Schools.Jack and DP said:
Sec. DeVos was lambasted for having zero experience with public education.
Yeah, it is.
A person with mental illness running the health dept worse than an inexperienced education secretary.
Only in quash's world.
Having a Department of Perversion Prevention, only in Mothra's government.
Well, his name is Legion so he has company.
You're hilarious.
When you're posting about Libertarian issues "hilarious" is apropos.
Libertarians could do with less Cabinet level power blocs.
But as long as we have them Libertarians would not use a mental illness as a bigoted litmus test to prevent one of the fifty million Americans with a mental illness to serve.
No? Because it doesn't affect his ability to perform his job.
If this nominee cannot perform the job because of her mental illness then make that case. So far all I'm hearing is that anyone with mental illness is automatically disqualified.
Instead of discussing the merits of the nominee we get memes and blanket job denial based on a health condition that affects people we all know and love who, somehow, manage to hold down their own jobs in all kinds of positions.
Edit: and yes, Libertarians believe in giving people the freedom to do their job, and in giving employers the right to decide who they hire. We also believe businesses can refuse to serve certain people. If a business hangs a sign that says "Mentally ill not welcome here" then you can shop there all you want. But I'm not going anywhere my loved ones can't go.
If Abbott was wanting to be a firefighter, I'd be against it because the wheelchair would be an impediment. As governor, it is not.
Policy disagreements are not enough to deny a Cabinet slot. As I said with the last three administrations: presidents are entitled to their advisors.D. C. Bear said:quash said:
What impact?
It doesn't automatically have an impact. In this case, it seems that the person is likely to offer a policy agenda where the idea of masking a child's actual sex and trying to make them appear they are the other sex via chemical injections and surgical mutilation is promoted. I don't find that acceptable.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
quash said:Policy disagreements are not enough to deny a Cabinet slot. As I said with the last three administrations: presidents are entitled to their advisors.D. C. Bear said:quash said:
What impact?
It doesn't automatically have an impact. In this case, it seems that the person is likely to offer a policy agenda where the idea of masking a child's actual sex and trying to make them appear they are the other sex via chemical injections and surgical mutilation is promoted. I don't find that acceptable.
When the policy is child abuse, I do not concur.
Like having a Secretary of Homeland Security who comes from the sex trafficking industryD. C. Bear said:quash said:Policy disagreements are not enough to deny a Cabinet slot. As I said with the last three administrations: presidents are entitled to their advisors.D. C. Bear said:quash said:
What impact?
It doesn't automatically have an impact. In this case, it seems that the person is likely to offer a policy agenda where the idea of masking a child's actual sex and trying to make them appear they are the other sex via chemical injections and surgical mutilation is promoted. I don't find that acceptable.
When the policy is child abuse, I do not concur.
Libertarians are cool with that as long as he/she can check the Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications boxes.Osodecentx said:Like having a Secretary of Homeland Security who comes from the sex trafficking industryD. C. Bear said:quash said:Policy disagreements are not enough to deny a Cabinet slot. As I said with the last three administrations: presidents are entitled to their advisors.D. C. Bear said:quash said:
What impact?
It doesn't automatically have an impact. In this case, it seems that the person is likely to offer a policy agenda where the idea of masking a child's actual sex and trying to make them appear they are the other sex via chemical injections and surgical mutilation is promoted. I don't find that acceptable.
When the policy is child abuse, I do not concur.
Close. Libertarians are fine with sex work but not trafficking. Freedom being the difference.Carlos Cruz said:Libertarians are cool with that as long as he/she can check the Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications boxes.Osodecentx said:Like having a Secretary of Homeland Security who comes from the sex trafficking industryD. C. Bear said:quash said:Policy disagreements are not enough to deny a Cabinet slot. As I said with the last three administrations: presidents are entitled to their advisors.D. C. Bear said:quash said:
What impact?
It doesn't automatically have an impact. In this case, it seems that the person is likely to offer a policy agenda where the idea of masking a child's actual sex and trying to make them appear they are the other sex via chemical injections and surgical mutilation is promoted. I don't find that acceptable.
When the policy is child abuse, I do not concur.
I would say "But you already knew that" except you didn't.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
LOL @ your naivety.quash said:Close. Libertarians are fine with sex work but not trafficking.Carlos Cruz said:Libertarians are cool with that as long as he/she can check the Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications boxes.Osodecentx said:Like having a Secretary of Homeland Security who comes from the sex trafficking industryD. C. Bear said:quash said:Policy disagreements are not enough to deny a Cabinet slot. As I said with the last three administrations: presidents are entitled to their advisors.D. C. Bear said:quash said:
What impact?
It doesn't automatically have an impact. In this case, it seems that the person is likely to offer a policy agenda where the idea of masking a child's actual sex and trying to make them appear they are the other sex via chemical injections and surgical mutilation is promoted. I don't find that acceptable.
When the policy is child abuse, I do not concur.
Yep. Minor children have no business being mutilated. Either physically being cut, or chemically being castrated basically. They aren't livestock.D. C. Bear said:quash said:Policy disagreements are not enough to deny a Cabinet slot. As I said with the last three administrations: presidents are entitled to their advisors.D. C. Bear said:quash said:
What impact?
It doesn't automatically have an impact. In this case, it seems that the person is likely to offer a policy agenda where the idea of masking a child's actual sex and trying to make them appear they are the other sex via chemical injections and surgical mutilation is promoted. I don't find that acceptable.
When the policy is child abuse, I do not concur.
If they want to do this to themselves when they are well into adulthood, nobody can stop them. But that early in life is child abuse.
What about circumcisions? I am told the procedure is much more painful as an adult! (Just stirring the pot a little)Forest Bueller_bf said:Yep. Minor children have no business being mutilated. Either physically being cut, or chemically being castrated basically. They aren't livestock.D. C. Bear said:quash said:Policy disagreements are not enough to deny a Cabinet slot. As I said with the last three administrations: presidents are entitled to their advisors.D. C. Bear said:quash said:
What impact?
It doesn't automatically have an impact. In this case, it seems that the person is likely to offer a policy agenda where the idea of masking a child's actual sex and trying to make them appear they are the other sex via chemical injections and surgical mutilation is promoted. I don't find that acceptable.
When the policy is child abuse, I do not concur.
If they want to do this to themselves when they are well into adulthood, nobody can stop them. But that early in life is child abuse.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"
-- Barack Obama
-- Barack Obama
YepMalbec said:...or not enough.CHP Bear said:Too much Botox.Thee University said:BikerBear said:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate The National Pulse Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as affiliation with a known questionable group, and a few failed fact checks.
Do you like my scarf?
Questionable source? Multiple sources. The new face of the Democrat party has emerged. A TRANsformation!
So Biden is out?quash said:
So far all I'm hearing is that anyone with mental illness is automatically disqualified.
are you referring to dementia or pedophilia?Thee University said:So Biden is out?quash said:
So far all I'm hearing is that anyone with mental illness is automatically disqualified.
And to think that many states ban conversion therapy under the guise of child harm.D. C. Bear said:quash said:Policy disagreements are not enough to deny a Cabinet slot. As I said with the last three administrations: presidents are entitled to their advisors.D. C. Bear said:quash said:
What impact?
It doesn't automatically have an impact. In this case, it seems that the person is likely to offer a policy agenda where the idea of masking a child's actual sex and trying to make them appear they are the other sex via chemical injections and surgical mutilation is promoted. I don't find that acceptable.
When the policy is child abuse, I do not concur
.
There is talk of both however the dementia is fairly advanced and unfortunately we have to watch it continue to get worse.LIB,MR BEARS said:are you referring to dementia or pedophilia?Thee University said:So Biden is out?quash said:
So far all I'm hearing is that anyone with mental illness is automatically disqualified.
Comical that the Dem leadership want to have multiple democrats to have access to the launch codes. Instead of the football maybe they can give Biden a baseball and tell him it's a football. It's doubtful he will know the difference.
18 U.S.C. %A7 922(dquash said:Cite?Mothra said:I don't know. %A0People with mental illnesses are not allowed to own firearms or serve in the armed forces. %A0Is it that much more bigoted to prevent them from heading the U.S. Health Dept.?quash said:Mothra said:Hilarious is you claiming to be libertarian. %A0quash said:Mothra said:Nah, we don't need that, but we do need to let them have govt. funds to spread their propaganda, right? %A0That's the "libertarian" position on perversion, according to quash.quash said:Mothra said:quash said:ATL Bear said:Well that's much worse....quash said:ATL Bear said:And to think, Betsy De Vos was lambasted for promoting Charter Schools. %A0Jack and DP said:
Sec. DeVos was lambasted for having zero experience with public education.
Yeah, it is.
A person with mental illness running the health dept worse than an inexperienced education secretary. %A0
Only in quash's world.
Having a Department of Perversion Prevention, only in Mothra's government.
Well, his name is Legion so he has company.
You're hilarious.
When you're posting about Libertarian issues "hilarious" is apropos.
Libertarians could do with less Cabinet level power blocs.
But as long as we have them Libertarians would not use a mental illness as a bigoted litmus test %A0to prevent one of the fifty million Americans with a mental illness to serve.
Here's mine.
https://www.verywellmind.com/mental-illnesses-serve-us-military-3973352
FYI, your cite says what I said. People with mental illness can't own firearms.quash said:Cite?Mothra said:I don't know. %A0People with mental illnesses are not allowed to own firearms or serve in the armed forces. %A0Is it that much more bigoted to prevent them from heading the U.S. Health Dept.?quash said:Mothra said:Hilarious is you claiming to be libertarian. %A0quash said:Mothra said:Nah, we don't need that, but we do need to let them have govt. funds to spread their propaganda, right? %A0That's the "libertarian" position on perversion, according to quash.quash said:Mothra said:quash said:ATL Bear said:Well that's much worse....quash said:ATL Bear said:And to think, Betsy De Vos was lambasted for promoting Charter Schools. %A0Jack and DP said:
Sec. DeVos was lambasted for having zero experience with public education.
Yeah, it is.
A person with mental illness running the health dept worse than an inexperienced education secretary. %A0
Only in quash's world.
Having a Department of Perversion Prevention, only in Mothra's government.
Well, his name is Legion so he has company.
You're hilarious.
When you're posting about Libertarian issues "hilarious" is apropos.
Libertarians could do with less Cabinet level power blocs.
But as long as we have them Libertarians would not use a mental illness as a bigoted litmus test %A0to prevent one of the fifty million Americans with a mental illness to serve.
Here's mine.
No, it doesn't. It circumscribes particular mental illness levels.Mothra said:FYI, your cite says what I said. People with mental illness can't own firearms.quash said:Cite?Mothra said:I don't know. %A0People with mental illnesses are not allowed to own firearms or serve in the armed forces. %A0Is it that much more bigoted to prevent them from heading the U.S. Health Dept.?quash said:Mothra said:Hilarious is you claiming to be libertarian. %A0quash said:Mothra said:Nah, we don't need that, but we do need to let them have govt. funds to spread their propaganda, right? %A0That's the "libertarian" position on perversion, according to quash.quash said:Mothra said:quash said:ATL Bear said:Well that's much worse....quash said:ATL Bear said:And to think, Betsy De Vos was lambasted for promoting Charter Schools. %A0Jack and DP said:
Sec. DeVos was lambasted for having zero experience with public education.
Yeah, it is.
A person with mental illness running the health dept worse than an inexperienced education secretary. %A0
Only in quash's world.
Having a Department of Perversion Prevention, only in Mothra's government.
Well, his name is Legion so he has company.
You're hilarious.
When you're posting about Libertarian issues "hilarious" is apropos.
Libertarians could do with less Cabinet level power blocs.
But as long as we have them Libertarians would not use a mental illness as a bigoted litmus test %A0to prevent one of the fifty million Americans with a mental illness to serve.
Here's mine.
Do you still want to ban 50 million Americans from public service?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Yes it does. It states that those who have been "adjudicated as a mental defective" or "committed to a mental institution" by courts, medical boards, or other govt. bodies prescribed with such tasks may not own a firearm. Likewise, they may not serve in the armed forces. Stop being obtuse. I know it's difficult for you.
I am perfectly fine with prohibiting someone with a mental illness from serving as assistant health secretary.
I am perfectly fine with prohibiting someone with a mental illness from serving as assistant health secretary.
Like I said, it doesn't deny carry rights to everyone with a mental illness, it circumscribes more serious cases. Obtuseness is your oeuvre.Mothra said:
Yes it does. It states that those who have been "adjudicated as a mental defective" or "committed to a mental institution" by courts, medical boards, or other govt. bodies prescribed with such tasks may not own a firearm. Likewise, they may not serve in the armed forces. Stop being obtuse. I know it's difficult for you.
I am perfectly fine with prohibiting someone with a mental illness from serving as assistant health secretary.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Good grief, man. You will argue with a wall.quash said:Like I said, it doesn't deny carry rights to everyone with a mental illness, it circumscribes more serious cases. Obtuseness is your oeuvre.Mothra said:
Yes it does. It states that those who have been "adjudicated as a mental defective" or "committed to a mental institution" by courts, medical boards, or other govt. bodies prescribed with such tasks may not own a firearm. Likewise, they may not serve in the armed forces. Stop being obtuse. I know it's difficult for you.
I am perfectly fine with prohibiting someone with a mental illness from serving as assistant health secretary.
I never suggested that those who had not been adjudicated mentally ill were circumscribed. Sheesh.
Mothra said:Good grief, man. You will argue with a wall.quash said:Like I said, it doesn't deny carry rights to everyone with a mental illness, it circumscribes more serious cases. Obtuseness is your oeuvre.Mothra said:
Yes it does. It states that those who have been "adjudicated as a mental defective" or "committed to a mental institution" by courts, medical boards, or other govt. bodies prescribed with such tasks may not own a firearm. Likewise, they may not serve in the armed forces. Stop being obtuse. I know it's difficult for you.
I am perfectly fine with prohibiting someone with a mental illness from serving as assistant health secretary.
I never suggested that those who had not been adjudicated mentally ill were circumscribed. Sheesh.
You're the wall? Mkay.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
The proverbial wall, numnut.quash said:Mothra said:Good grief, man. You will argue with a wall.quash said:Like I said, it doesn't deny carry rights to everyone with a mental illness, it circumscribes more serious cases. Obtuseness is your oeuvre.Mothra said:
Yes it does. It states that those who have been "adjudicated as a mental defective" or "committed to a mental institution" by courts, medical boards, or other govt. bodies prescribed with such tasks may not own a firearm. Likewise, they may not serve in the armed forces. Stop being obtuse. I know it's difficult for you.
I am perfectly fine with prohibiting someone with a mental illness from serving as assistant health secretary.
I never suggested that those who had not been adjudicated mentally ill were circumscribed. Sheesh.
You're the wall? Mkay.