Florda_mike said:
False flag attack then a military conflict to divert attention from something else that was about to happen to Deep State
Never ending cycle
I predicted this a week ago to a friend
Deep State is fixing to be exposed
Robert Wilson said:
You did not get your $2000, but you did get to bomb Syria. So there's that.
Dnicknames said:Florda_mike said:
False flag attack then a military conflict to divert attention from something else that was about to happen to Deep State
Never ending cycle
I predicted this a week ago to a friend
Deep State is fixing to be exposed
Didn't you also predict the deep state would be exposed January 20th?
Osodecentx said:
I like striking against Iranian surrogates.
I supported it when Obama did it, when Trump did it and when O'Biden does it
"Some people did something" Rep. Ilhan Omar.Booray said:
The rockets that killed an American contractor and wounded others were launched from somewhere.
Someday I'd like to meet the Republican Party that traditionally held this as a principle. They must have died out before the Cold War. Maybe they can be revived through DNA sequencing, like woolly mammoths.Mothra said:Osodecentx said:
I like striking against Iranian surrogates.
I supported it when Obama did it, when Trump did it and when O'Biden does it
I prefer the traditional Republican principle of not involving ourselves in foreign conflicts that have little if any benefit for our security or national interests.
First, that's your spin bubba, not the 'consensus'. I don't really see a consensus on this issue.bubbadog said:
To recap the consensus of this board:
Three days ago, Biden was soft on Iran, an appeaser who was willing to sell out our "friends," the Saudis, for the sake of reviving the nuclear deal with Tehran.
Now, by striking Iranian proxies in Syria (an action that also has the effect of supporting our Israeli and Kurdish allies), Biden is a dangerous neo-con warmonger.
Makes perfect sense.
Did I miss the part where you disagreed with those who said Biden is soft on Iran and that he is a warmonger?Oldbear83 said:First, that's your spin bubba, not the 'consensus'. I don't really see a consensus on this issue.bubbadog said:
To recap the consensus of this board:
Three days ago, Biden was soft on Iran, an appeaser who was willing to sell out our "friends," the Saudis, for the sake of reviving the nuclear deal with Tehran.
Now, by striking Iranian proxies in Syria (an action that also has the effect of supporting our Israeli and Kurdish allies), Biden is a dangerous neo-con warmonger.
Makes perfect sense.
Second, maybe you should pay attention to what people actually post, not write in your spin to claim they say something other than what is really there. We have CNN if we want fiction for news.
Third, I'd like to hear how Biden reached the decision. Did he have something like this ready to go and wanted to take a measured action at the right time and place, or was he just doing what his aides said was necessary? That's important for understanding his Middle East doctrine, which historically has always been tricky for Presidents, of both parties.
Where is this consensus?bubbadog said:
To recap the consensus of this board:
Three days ago, Biden was soft on Iran, an appeaser who was willing to sell out our "friends," the Saudis, for the sake of reviving the nuclear deal with Tehran.
Now, by striking Iranian proxies in Syria (an action that also has the effect of supporting our Israeli and Kurdish allies), Biden is a dangerous neo-con warmonger.
Makes perfect sense.
***?Oldbear83 said:"Some people did something" Rep. Ilhan Omar.Booray said:
The rockets that killed an American contractor and wounded others were launched from somewhere.
You missed the part where a lot of us think for ourselves, and don't buy prepackaged opinions.bubbadog said:Did I miss the part where you disagreed with those who said Biden is soft on Iran and that he is a warmonger?Oldbear83 said:First, that's your spin bubba, not the 'consensus'. I don't really see a consensus on this issue.bubbadog said:
To recap the consensus of this board:
Three days ago, Biden was soft on Iran, an appeaser who was willing to sell out our "friends," the Saudis, for the sake of reviving the nuclear deal with Tehran.
Now, by striking Iranian proxies in Syria (an action that also has the effect of supporting our Israeli and Kurdish allies), Biden is a dangerous neo-con warmonger.
Makes perfect sense.
Second, maybe you should pay attention to what people actually post, not write in your spin to claim they say something other than what is really there. We have CNN if we want fiction for news.
Third, I'd like to hear how Biden reached the decision. Did he have something like this ready to go and wanted to take a measured action at the right time and place, or was he just doing what his aides said was necessary? That's important for understanding his Middle East doctrine, which historically has always been tricky for Presidents, of both parties.
What if that was his reason?Booray said:***?Oldbear83 said:"Some people did something" Rep. Ilhan Omar.Booray said:
The rockets that killed an American contractor and wounded others were launched from somewhere.
My point is that Americans died and were injured as the result of rocket attacks. Biden authorized retaliatory strikes. Whether that is an appropriate response and wheter the Americans should have been there in the first place to be attacked are good questions. Pretending that Biden did this to appease the military-industrial complex ignores the dead and injured Americans.
Wait until you find out how they acquired those rockets.Booray said:***?Oldbear83 said:"Some people did something" Rep. Ilhan Omar.Booray said:
The rockets that killed an American contractor and wounded others were launched from somewhere.
My point is that Americans died and were injured as the result of rocket attacks.
Pallets O'Cash? Pls. Advize.Doc Holliday said:Wait until you find out how they acquired those rockets.Booray said:***?Oldbear83 said:"Some people did something" Rep. Ilhan Omar.Booray said:
The rockets that killed an American contractor and wounded others were launched from somewhere.
My point is that Americans died and were injured as the result of rocket attacks.
US-Middle East Arms contracts.Carlos Cruz said:Pallets O'Cash? Pls. Advize.Doc Holliday said:Wait until you find out how they acquired those rockets.Booray said:***?Oldbear83 said:"Some people did something" Rep. Ilhan Omar.Booray said:
The rockets that killed an American contractor and wounded others were launched from somewhere.
My point is that Americans died and were injured as the result of rocket attacks.
In his head.Robert Wilson said:Where is this consensus?bubbadog said:
To recap the consensus of this board:
Three days ago, Biden was soft on Iran, an appeaser who was willing to sell out our "friends," the Saudis, for the sake of reviving the nuclear deal with Tehran.
Now, by striking Iranian proxies in Syria (an action that also has the effect of supporting our Israeli and Kurdish allies), Biden is a dangerous neo-con warmonger.
Makes perfect sense.