WacoKelly83 said:
Looting Foot Locker, Walmart, and Cicis pizza. Cicis???
They heard they had a lot of dough.WacoKelly83 said:
Looting Foot Locker, Walmart, and Cicis pizza. Cicis???
WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
Did you watch the video?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
Canon said:Did you watch the video?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
The officers had zero evidence of the ethnicity of the driver (hispanic) and pulled him over because he had no visible plate on his dark tinted SUV. When they approached the vehicle, they could only see his hands (eventually), which were not of a shade to determine race or ethnicity with any certainty. The officers had no indication he was in the military, as the arm of his BDUs wasn't enough to indicate he was in the a uniform at all. The officer (another hispanic) tasered him only after the officers told him at least TWENTY-NINE (29) TIMES to get out of the car and his REFUSING to follow a lawful command. This was after they had to tell him 8 times to "put your hands out of the window" or "let me see your hands."
It is truly the stuff of pure ignorance to read this situation as anything other than something brought on by a person who considered himself above the law. People are making this particular story about race. It isn't, unless by that you mean that statistically the group of people LEAST compliant with law enforcement lawful orders are those MOST likely to be engaged with physical force. You can't pick and choose when you want to obey the law and not expect there to be real and tangible consequences for that.
There are instances of police overreach. When you find those, let's discuss those and fight them together. When you find them, let's fight them as precisely what they are and not more fantastical evidence of fictional 'systemic racism' or the like.
It's amazing what any person can see when that person watches video evidence with an objective, rather than a jaundiced, eye. It's amazing how viewing the world objectively makes fictional claims of racism evaporate back into the ether from whence they emerged.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Did you watch the video?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
The officers had zero evidence of the ethnicity of the driver (hispanic) and pulled him over because he had no visible plate on his dark tinted SUV. When they approached the vehicle, they could only see his hands (eventually), which were not of a shade to determine race or ethnicity with any certainty. The officers had no indication he was in the military, as the arm of his BDUs wasn't enough to indicate he was in the a uniform at all. The officer (another hispanic) tasered him only after the officers told him at least TWENTY-NINE (29) TIMES to get out of the car and his REFUSING to follow a lawful command. This was after they had to tell him 8 times to "put your hands out of the window" or "let me see your hands."
It is truly the stuff of pure ignorance to read this situation as anything other than something brought on by a person who considered himself above the law. People are making this particular story about race. It isn't, unless by that you mean that statistically the group of people LEAST compliant with law enforcement lawful orders are those MOST likely to be engaged with physical force. You can't pick and choose when you want to obey the law and not expect there to be real and tangible consequences for that.
There are instances of police overreach. When you find those, let's discuss those and fight them together. When you find them, let's fight them as precisely what they are and not more fantastical evidence of fictional 'systemic racism' or the like.
Amazing what one person sees and what another sees. He's black and Hispanic btw
The guy was clearly military. Easy to see from the beginning.
Buddha Bear said:
I havent really expressed an opinion either way. But the Virginia Attorney General and Governor disagree with you.
I am skeptical of the cops in all instances bc they're just an extension of the govt but the army dude didnt listen or comply with the police. He is in the military so he should understand following orders. If he complied it would have all been over quickly without a confrontation. That being said, Virginia is a cop state with a lot of dick-head cops and I am not a fan of that state.Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
Canon said:Buddha Bear said:
I havent really expressed an opinion either way. But the Virginia Attorney General and Governor disagree with you.
Yes. I often disagree with politicians who dress in KKK attire, wear black face and justify literal infanticide. You might consider the men you are siding with in your appeal to authority. Not one, both of them.
I forgot to thank you for letting me know the driver was both hispanic and black. That you took the time to make sure that aspect of his features was prominent while ignoring the dozens of lawful orders he ignored, while virtually invisible to the police inside his blacked out SUV, suggests you are taking a side.
Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Buddha Bear said:
I havent really expressed an opinion either way. But the Virginia Attorney General and Governor disagree with you.
Yes. I often disagree with politicians who dress in KKK attire, wear black face and justify literal infanticide. You might consider the men you are siding with in your appeal to authority. Not one, both of them.
I forgot to thank you for letting me know the driver was both hispanic and black. That you took the time to make sure that aspect of his features was prominent while ignoring the dozens of lawful orders he ignored, while virtually invisible to the police inside his blacked out SUV, suggests you are taking a side.
Anyways, the cop that pepper sprayed the innocent man just got fired.
Do you ever grow tired of your own self-rightfulness?Canon said:It's amazing what any person can see when that person watches video evidence with an objective, rather than a jaundiced, eye. It's amazing how viewing the world objectively makes fictional claims of racism evaporate back into the ether from whence they emerged.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Did you watch the video?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
The officers had zero evidence of the ethnicity of the driver (hispanic) and pulled him over because he had no visible plate on his dark tinted SUV. When they approached the vehicle, they could only see his hands (eventually), which were not of a shade to determine race or ethnicity with any certainty. The officers had no indication he was in the military, as the arm of his BDUs wasn't enough to indicate he was in the a uniform at all. The officer (another hispanic) tasered him only after the officers told him at least TWENTY-NINE (29) TIMES to get out of the car and his REFUSING to follow a lawful command. This was after they had to tell him 8 times to "put your hands out of the window" or "let me see your hands."
It is truly the stuff of pure ignorance to read this situation as anything other than something brought on by a person who considered himself above the law. People are making this particular story about race. It isn't, unless by that you mean that statistically the group of people LEAST compliant with law enforcement lawful orders are those MOST likely to be engaged with physical force. You can't pick and choose when you want to obey the law and not expect there to be real and tangible consequences for that.
There are instances of police overreach. When you find those, let's discuss those and fight them together. When you find them, let's fight them as precisely what they are and not more fantastical evidence of fictional 'systemic racism' or the like.
Amazing what one person sees and what another sees. He's black and Hispanic btw
The guy was clearly military. Easy to see from the beginning.
If you are ok with making your above claims and don't feel the least bit concerned about your character, then I think we are done here. None of what you posted right there is true, save for how he identifies racially....which is, of course, the source of his lawsuit.
For those who haven't seen the video: It's not until he vocally claimed to be a "veteran" around the 2:00 mark in the video that it would even become likely. Count the lawful commands he received and disobeyed in between the police exiting the car and his first encounter with use of force. Look for his license plate on his SUV. Listen to the police radio regarding the felony traffic stop justifying the use of extreme caution. For all intents and purposes, that driver could have been a 90 yr old samoan grandmother or a set of red head 7yr old twin boys working the peddles and steering wheel in tandem until the 2:00 mark. Yet the claim (one you appear to want to bolster) is racism.
You might consider reading the post you choose to comment on. It's incredibly useful, particularly if you wish to attempt to quote things. I'll leave you to it.BaylorBJM said:Do you ever grow tired of your own self-rightfulness?Canon said:It's amazing what any person can see when that person watches video evidence with an objective, rather than a jaundiced, eye. It's amazing how viewing the world objectively makes fictional claims of racism evaporate back into the ether from whence they emerged.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Did you watch the video?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
The officers had zero evidence of the ethnicity of the driver (hispanic) and pulled him over because he had no visible plate on his dark tinted SUV. When they approached the vehicle, they could only see his hands (eventually), which were not of a shade to determine race or ethnicity with any certainty. The officers had no indication he was in the military, as the arm of his BDUs wasn't enough to indicate he was in the a uniform at all. The officer (another hispanic) tasered him only after the officers told him at least TWENTY-NINE (29) TIMES to get out of the car and his REFUSING to follow a lawful command. This was after they had to tell him 8 times to "put your hands out of the window" or "let me see your hands."
It is truly the stuff of pure ignorance to read this situation as anything other than something brought on by a person who considered himself above the law. People are making this particular story about race. It isn't, unless by that you mean that statistically the group of people LEAST compliant with law enforcement lawful orders are those MOST likely to be engaged with physical force. You can't pick and choose when you want to obey the law and not expect there to be real and tangible consequences for that.
There are instances of police overreach. When you find those, let's discuss those and fight them together. When you find them, let's fight them as precisely what they are and not more fantastical evidence of fictional 'systemic racism' or the like.
Amazing what one person sees and what another sees. He's black and Hispanic btw
The guy was clearly military. Easy to see from the beginning.
If you are ok with making your above claims and don't feel the least bit concerned about your character, then I think we are done here. None of what you posted right there is true, save for how he identifies racially....which is, of course, the source of his lawsuit.
For those who haven't seen the video: It's not until he vocally claimed to be a "veteran" around the 2:00 mark in the video that it would even become likely. Count the lawful commands he received and disobeyed in between the police exiting the car and his first encounter with use of force. Look for his license plate on his SUV. Listen to the police radio regarding the felony traffic stop justifying the use of extreme caution. For all intents and purposes, that driver could have been a 90 yr old samoan grandmother or a set of red head 7yr old twin boys working the peddles and steering wheel in tandem until the 2:00 mark. Yet the claim (one you appear to want to bolster) is racism.
I swear, you have some sort of self-mandated quota on this board to referring to yourself as "objectionable".
Every.single.post.
I understand why you don't want to engage. You're getting owned on this thread.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Buddha Bear said:
I havent really expressed an opinion either way. But the Virginia Attorney General and Governor disagree with you.
Yes. I often disagree with politicians who dress in KKK attire, wear black face and justify literal infanticide. You might consider the men you are siding with in your appeal to authority. Not one, both of them.
I forgot to thank you for letting me know the driver was both hispanic and black. That you took the time to make sure that aspect of his features was prominent while ignoring the dozens of lawful orders he ignored, while virtually invisible to the police inside his blacked out SUV, suggests you are taking a side.
Anyways, the cop that pepper sprayed the innocent man just got fired.
Well, he is dealing with one of the most easily triggered liberals on this website (and yes, I am referring to you).BaylorBJM said:Do you ever grow tired of your own self-rightfulness?Canon said:It's amazing what any person can see when that person watches video evidence with an objective, rather than a jaundiced, eye. It's amazing how viewing the world objectively makes fictional claims of racism evaporate back into the ether from whence they emerged.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Did you watch the video?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
The officers had zero evidence of the ethnicity of the driver (hispanic) and pulled him over because he had no visible plate on his dark tinted SUV. When they approached the vehicle, they could only see his hands (eventually), which were not of a shade to determine race or ethnicity with any certainty. The officers had no indication he was in the military, as the arm of his BDUs wasn't enough to indicate he was in the a uniform at all. The officer (another hispanic) tasered him only after the officers told him at least TWENTY-NINE (29) TIMES to get out of the car and his REFUSING to follow a lawful command. This was after they had to tell him 8 times to "put your hands out of the window" or "let me see your hands."
It is truly the stuff of pure ignorance to read this situation as anything other than something brought on by a person who considered himself above the law. People are making this particular story about race. It isn't, unless by that you mean that statistically the group of people LEAST compliant with law enforcement lawful orders are those MOST likely to be engaged with physical force. You can't pick and choose when you want to obey the law and not expect there to be real and tangible consequences for that.
There are instances of police overreach. When you find those, let's discuss those and fight them together. When you find them, let's fight them as precisely what they are and not more fantastical evidence of fictional 'systemic racism' or the like.
Amazing what one person sees and what another sees. He's black and Hispanic btw
The guy was clearly military. Easy to see from the beginning.
If you are ok with making your above claims and don't feel the least bit concerned about your character, then I think we are done here. None of what you posted right there is true, save for how he identifies racially....which is, of course, the source of his lawsuit.
For those who haven't seen the video: It's not until he vocally claimed to be a "veteran" around the 2:00 mark in the video that it would even become likely. Count the lawful commands he received and disobeyed in between the police exiting the car and his first encounter with use of force. Look for his license plate on his SUV. Listen to the police radio regarding the felony traffic stop justifying the use of extreme caution. For all intents and purposes, that driver could have been a 90 yr old samoan grandmother or a set of red head 7yr old twin boys working the peddles and steering wheel in tandem until the 2:00 mark. Yet the claim (one you appear to want to bolster) is racism.
I swear, you have some sort of self-mandated quota on this board to referring to yourself as "objectionable".
Every.single.post.
Prime illustration of what I mean when I say outsiders who visit this site would have no reason to believe that Baylor is a Christian university and that Christianity is not a religion of hate.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Animals. Enough said, They should be euthanized.
Mothra said:Well, he is dealing with one of the most easily triggered liberals on this website (and yes, I am referring to you).BaylorBJM said:Do you ever grow tired of your own self-rightfulness?Canon said:It's amazing what any person can see when that person watches video evidence with an objective, rather than a jaundiced, eye. It's amazing how viewing the world objectively makes fictional claims of racism evaporate back into the ether from whence they emerged.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Did you watch the video?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
The officers had zero evidence of the ethnicity of the driver (hispanic) and pulled him over because he had no visible plate on his dark tinted SUV. When they approached the vehicle, they could only see his hands (eventually), which were not of a shade to determine race or ethnicity with any certainty. The officers had no indication he was in the military, as the arm of his BDUs wasn't enough to indicate he was in the a uniform at all. The officer (another hispanic) tasered him only after the officers told him at least TWENTY-NINE (29) TIMES to get out of the car and his REFUSING to follow a lawful command. This was after they had to tell him 8 times to "put your hands out of the window" or "let me see your hands."
It is truly the stuff of pure ignorance to read this situation as anything other than something brought on by a person who considered himself above the law. People are making this particular story about race. It isn't, unless by that you mean that statistically the group of people LEAST compliant with law enforcement lawful orders are those MOST likely to be engaged with physical force. You can't pick and choose when you want to obey the law and not expect there to be real and tangible consequences for that.
There are instances of police overreach. When you find those, let's discuss those and fight them together. When you find them, let's fight them as precisely what they are and not more fantastical evidence of fictional 'systemic racism' or the like.
Amazing what one person sees and what another sees. He's black and Hispanic btw
The guy was clearly military. Easy to see from the beginning.
If you are ok with making your above claims and don't feel the least bit concerned about your character, then I think we are done here. None of what you posted right there is true, save for how he identifies racially....which is, of course, the source of his lawsuit.
For those who haven't seen the video: It's not until he vocally claimed to be a "veteran" around the 2:00 mark in the video that it would even become likely. Count the lawful commands he received and disobeyed in between the police exiting the car and his first encounter with use of force. Look for his license plate on his SUV. Listen to the police radio regarding the felony traffic stop justifying the use of extreme caution. For all intents and purposes, that driver could have been a 90 yr old samoan grandmother or a set of red head 7yr old twin boys working the peddles and steering wheel in tandem until the 2:00 mark. Yet the claim (one you appear to want to bolster) is racism.
I swear, you have some sort of self-mandated quota on this board to referring to yourself as "objectionable".
Every.single.post.
BTW, what is self-rightfulness? Is it akin to self-righteousness?
To put this in perspective:Mothra said:I understand why you don't want to engage. You're getting owned on this thread.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Buddha Bear said:
I havent really expressed an opinion either way. But the Virginia Attorney General and Governor disagree with you.
Yes. I often disagree with politicians who dress in KKK attire, wear black face and justify literal infanticide. You might consider the men you are siding with in your appeal to authority. Not one, both of them.
I forgot to thank you for letting me know the driver was both hispanic and black. That you took the time to make sure that aspect of his features was prominent while ignoring the dozens of lawful orders he ignored, while virtually invisible to the police inside his blacked out SUV, suggests you are taking a side.
Anyways, the cop that pepper sprayed the innocent man just got fired.
BaylorBJM said:Mothra said:Well, he is dealing with one of the most easily triggered liberals on this website (and yes, I am referring to you).BaylorBJM said:Do you ever grow tired of your own self-rightfulness?Canon said:It's amazing what any person can see when that person watches video evidence with an objective, rather than a jaundiced, eye. It's amazing how viewing the world objectively makes fictional claims of racism evaporate back into the ether from whence they emerged.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Did you watch the video?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
The officers had zero evidence of the ethnicity of the driver (hispanic) and pulled him over because he had no visible plate on his dark tinted SUV. When they approached the vehicle, they could only see his hands (eventually), which were not of a shade to determine race or ethnicity with any certainty. The officers had no indication he was in the military, as the arm of his BDUs wasn't enough to indicate he was in the a uniform at all. The officer (another hispanic) tasered him only after the officers told him at least TWENTY-NINE (29) TIMES to get out of the car and his REFUSING to follow a lawful command. This was after they had to tell him 8 times to "put your hands out of the window" or "let me see your hands."
It is truly the stuff of pure ignorance to read this situation as anything other than something brought on by a person who considered himself above the law. People are making this particular story about race. It isn't, unless by that you mean that statistically the group of people LEAST compliant with law enforcement lawful orders are those MOST likely to be engaged with physical force. You can't pick and choose when you want to obey the law and not expect there to be real and tangible consequences for that.
There are instances of police overreach. When you find those, let's discuss those and fight them together. When you find them, let's fight them as precisely what they are and not more fantastical evidence of fictional 'systemic racism' or the like.
Amazing what one person sees and what another sees. He's black and Hispanic btw
The guy was clearly military. Easy to see from the beginning.
If you are ok with making your above claims and don't feel the least bit concerned about your character, then I think we are done here. None of what you posted right there is true, save for how he identifies racially....which is, of course, the source of his lawsuit.
For those who haven't seen the video: It's not until he vocally claimed to be a "veteran" around the 2:00 mark in the video that it would even become likely. Count the lawful commands he received and disobeyed in between the police exiting the car and his first encounter with use of force. Look for his license plate on his SUV. Listen to the police radio regarding the felony traffic stop justifying the use of extreme caution. For all intents and purposes, that driver could have been a 90 yr old samoan grandmother or a set of red head 7yr old twin boys working the peddles and steering wheel in tandem until the 2:00 mark. Yet the claim (one you appear to want to bolster) is racism.
I swear, you have some sort of self-mandated quota on this board to referring to yourself as "objectionable".
Every.single.post.
BTW, what is self-rightfulness? Is it akin to self-righteousness?
lol the auto-correct was a good one. Irony at its finest given my post; I'm 100% okay making fun of myself. You should check out the football and basketball boards sometime. I'm always bumping threads where I've made ****** predictions and posts.
Premise still applies however. Canon (and his other sock) spend more time on this board huffing and puffing about how they're always right and the only objectionable one here and ignoring any other counter-arguments. The self-awareness is nearly non-existent. It grows tiresome.
And no, far from being a liberal. In fact, I've only voted Democrat in probably three of the dozens of elections I've participated in. But go ahead and automatically default to the tribal politicism.
It seems to be the M.O. you and so many others on here seemingly can't get away from.
How do you feel about this one?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
Ehh, I don't really care that much to proofread my posts on the R&P board. I type out the majority of these on my tiny little iPhone while sitting on conference calls. I find it all humorous and it's why I have the default laughing emoji. Politics isn't my life like so many of you. I average less than a post per day on this board and don't have the time nor inclination to rack up tens of thousands of posts on this board alone like many of you or engage in multiple handles. It's more fun to lob a bomb or two every few days then watch the usual roaches scurry out and fall into line.Canon said:BaylorBJM said:Mothra said:Well, he is dealing with one of the most easily triggered liberals on this website (and yes, I am referring to you).BaylorBJM said:Do you ever grow tired of your own self-rightfulness?Canon said:It's amazing what any person can see when that person watches video evidence with an objective, rather than a jaundiced, eye. It's amazing how viewing the world objectively makes fictional claims of racism evaporate back into the ether from whence they emerged.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Did you watch the video?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
The officers had zero evidence of the ethnicity of the driver (hispanic) and pulled him over because he had no visible plate on his dark tinted SUV. When they approached the vehicle, they could only see his hands (eventually), which were not of a shade to determine race or ethnicity with any certainty. The officers had no indication he was in the military, as the arm of his BDUs wasn't enough to indicate he was in the a uniform at all. The officer (another hispanic) tasered him only after the officers told him at least TWENTY-NINE (29) TIMES to get out of the car and his REFUSING to follow a lawful command. This was after they had to tell him 8 times to "put your hands out of the window" or "let me see your hands."
It is truly the stuff of pure ignorance to read this situation as anything other than something brought on by a person who considered himself above the law. People are making this particular story about race. It isn't, unless by that you mean that statistically the group of people LEAST compliant with law enforcement lawful orders are those MOST likely to be engaged with physical force. You can't pick and choose when you want to obey the law and not expect there to be real and tangible consequences for that.
There are instances of police overreach. When you find those, let's discuss those and fight them together. When you find them, let's fight them as precisely what they are and not more fantastical evidence of fictional 'systemic racism' or the like.
Amazing what one person sees and what another sees. He's black and Hispanic btw
The guy was clearly military. Easy to see from the beginning.
If you are ok with making your above claims and don't feel the least bit concerned about your character, then I think we are done here. None of what you posted right there is true, save for how he identifies racially....which is, of course, the source of his lawsuit.
For those who haven't seen the video: It's not until he vocally claimed to be a "veteran" around the 2:00 mark in the video that it would even become likely. Count the lawful commands he received and disobeyed in between the police exiting the car and his first encounter with use of force. Look for his license plate on his SUV. Listen to the police radio regarding the felony traffic stop justifying the use of extreme caution. For all intents and purposes, that driver could have been a 90 yr old samoan grandmother or a set of red head 7yr old twin boys working the peddles and steering wheel in tandem until the 2:00 mark. Yet the claim (one you appear to want to bolster) is racism.
I swear, you have some sort of self-mandated quota on this board to referring to yourself as "objectionable".
Every.single.post.
BTW, what is self-rightfulness? Is it akin to self-righteousness?
lol the auto-correct was a good one. Irony at its finest given my post; I'm 100% okay making fun of myself. You should check out the football and basketball boards sometime. I'm always bumping threads where I've made ****** predictions and posts.
Premise still applies however. Canon (and his other sock) spend more time on this board huffing and puffing about how they're always right and the only objectionable one here and ignoring any other counter-arguments. The self-awareness is nearly non-existent. It grows tiresome.
And no, far from being a liberal. In fact, I've only voted Democrat in probably three of the dozens of elections I've participated in. But go ahead and automatically default to the tribal politicism.
It seems to be the M.O. you and so many others on here seemingly can't get away from.
You really really may want to consider proof reading your posts. Objectively, your repeated use of the word "objectionable" lacks a certain amount of objectivity and doesn't really achieve your objectives. You seem to be objectifying me as some objectivist. I object to that.
Canon said:BaylorBJM said:Mothra said:Well, he is dealing with one of the most easily triggered liberals on this website (and yes, I am referring to you).BaylorBJM said:Do you ever grow tired of your own self-rightfulness?Canon said:It's amazing what any person can see when that person watches video evidence with an objective, rather than a jaundiced, eye. It's amazing how viewing the world objectively makes fictional claims of racism evaporate back into the ether from whence they emerged.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Did you watch the video?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
The officers had zero evidence of the ethnicity of the driver (hispanic) and pulled him over because he had no visible plate on his dark tinted SUV. When they approached the vehicle, they could only see his hands (eventually), which were not of a shade to determine race or ethnicity with any certainty. The officers had no indication he was in the military, as the arm of his BDUs wasn't enough to indicate he was in the a uniform at all. The officer (another hispanic) tasered him only after the officers told him at least TWENTY-NINE (29) TIMES to get out of the car and his REFUSING to follow a lawful command. This was after they had to tell him 8 times to "put your hands out of the window" or "let me see your hands."
It is truly the stuff of pure ignorance to read this situation as anything other than something brought on by a person who considered himself above the law. People are making this particular story about race. It isn't, unless by that you mean that statistically the group of people LEAST compliant with law enforcement lawful orders are those MOST likely to be engaged with physical force. You can't pick and choose when you want to obey the law and not expect there to be real and tangible consequences for that.
There are instances of police overreach. When you find those, let's discuss those and fight them together. When you find them, let's fight them as precisely what they are and not more fantastical evidence of fictional 'systemic racism' or the like.
Amazing what one person sees and what another sees. He's black and Hispanic btw
The guy was clearly military. Easy to see from the beginning.
If you are ok with making your above claims and don't feel the least bit concerned about your character, then I think we are done here. None of what you posted right there is true, save for how he identifies racially....which is, of course, the source of his lawsuit.
For those who haven't seen the video: It's not until he vocally claimed to be a "veteran" around the 2:00 mark in the video that it would even become likely. Count the lawful commands he received and disobeyed in between the police exiting the car and his first encounter with use of force. Look for his license plate on his SUV. Listen to the police radio regarding the felony traffic stop justifying the use of extreme caution. For all intents and purposes, that driver could have been a 90 yr old samoan grandmother or a set of red head 7yr old twin boys working the peddles and steering wheel in tandem until the 2:00 mark. Yet the claim (one you appear to want to bolster) is racism.
I swear, you have some sort of self-mandated quota on this board to referring to yourself as "objectionable".
Every.single.post.
BTW, what is self-rightfulness? Is it akin to self-righteousness?
lol the auto-correct was a good one. Irony at its finest given my post; I'm 100% okay making fun of myself. You should check out the football and basketball boards sometime. I'm always bumping threads where I've made ****** predictions and posts.
Premise still applies however. Canon (and his other sock) spend more time on this board huffing and puffing about how they're always right and the only objectionable one here and ignoring any other counter-arguments. The self-awareness is nearly non-existent. It grows tiresome.
And no, far from being a liberal. In fact, I've only voted Democrat in probably three of the dozens of elections I've participated in. But go ahead and automatically default to the tribal politicism.
It seems to be the M.O. you and so many others on here seemingly can't get away from.
You really really may want to consider proof reading your posts. Objectively, your repeated use of the word "objectionable" lacks a certain amount of objectivity and doesn't really achieve your objectives. You seem to be objectifying me as some objectivist. I object to that.
Mothra said:I understand why you don't want to engage. You're getting owned on this thread.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Buddha Bear said:
I havent really expressed an opinion either way. But the Virginia Attorney General and Governor disagree with you.
Yes. I often disagree with politicians who dress in KKK attire, wear black face and justify literal infanticide. You might consider the men you are siding with in your appeal to authority. Not one, both of them.
I forgot to thank you for letting me know the driver was both hispanic and black. That you took the time to make sure that aspect of his features was prominent while ignoring the dozens of lawful orders he ignored, while virtually invisible to the police inside his blacked out SUV, suggests you are taking a side.
Anyways, the cop that pepper sprayed the innocent man just got fired.
With all due respect, you seem to do a lot of huffing and puffing over conservative posters an awful lot on these boards. You claim you are not a lib, but I can't think of single liberal poster you've criticized. Your ire (and there is a lot of ire) seems to be directed exclusively at conservatives.BaylorBJM said:Mothra said:Well, he is dealing with one of the most easily triggered liberals on this website (and yes, I am referring to you).BaylorBJM said:Do you ever grow tired of your own self-rightfulness?Canon said:It's amazing what any person can see when that person watches video evidence with an objective, rather than a jaundiced, eye. It's amazing how viewing the world objectively makes fictional claims of racism evaporate back into the ether from whence they emerged.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Did you watch the video?Buddha Bear said:WacoKelly83 said:
Officer involved shooting of a 21 year old black male in Brooklyn Center tonight. Watching on YouTube. Getting pretty wild.
https://kstp.com/minnesota-news/brooklyn-center-police-fatally-shoot-driver-during-traffic-stop-april-11-2021/6072013/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/04/10/virginia-police-gunpoint-army-nazario/
How do you guys feel about this one?
Support the troops or back the blue?
The officers had zero evidence of the ethnicity of the driver (hispanic) and pulled him over because he had no visible plate on his dark tinted SUV. When they approached the vehicle, they could only see his hands (eventually), which were not of a shade to determine race or ethnicity with any certainty. The officers had no indication he was in the military, as the arm of his BDUs wasn't enough to indicate he was in the a uniform at all. The officer (another hispanic) tasered him only after the officers told him at least TWENTY-NINE (29) TIMES to get out of the car and his REFUSING to follow a lawful command. This was after they had to tell him 8 times to "put your hands out of the window" or "let me see your hands."
It is truly the stuff of pure ignorance to read this situation as anything other than something brought on by a person who considered himself above the law. People are making this particular story about race. It isn't, unless by that you mean that statistically the group of people LEAST compliant with law enforcement lawful orders are those MOST likely to be engaged with physical force. You can't pick and choose when you want to obey the law and not expect there to be real and tangible consequences for that.
There are instances of police overreach. When you find those, let's discuss those and fight them together. When you find them, let's fight them as precisely what they are and not more fantastical evidence of fictional 'systemic racism' or the like.
Amazing what one person sees and what another sees. He's black and Hispanic btw
The guy was clearly military. Easy to see from the beginning.
If you are ok with making your above claims and don't feel the least bit concerned about your character, then I think we are done here. None of what you posted right there is true, save for how he identifies racially....which is, of course, the source of his lawsuit.
For those who haven't seen the video: It's not until he vocally claimed to be a "veteran" around the 2:00 mark in the video that it would even become likely. Count the lawful commands he received and disobeyed in between the police exiting the car and his first encounter with use of force. Look for his license plate on his SUV. Listen to the police radio regarding the felony traffic stop justifying the use of extreme caution. For all intents and purposes, that driver could have been a 90 yr old samoan grandmother or a set of red head 7yr old twin boys working the peddles and steering wheel in tandem until the 2:00 mark. Yet the claim (one you appear to want to bolster) is racism.
I swear, you have some sort of self-mandated quota on this board to referring to yourself as "objectionable".
Every.single.post.
BTW, what is self-rightfulness? Is it akin to self-righteousness?
lol the auto-correct was a good one. Irony at its finest given my post; I'm 100% okay making fun of myself. You should check out the football and basketball boards sometime. I'm always bumping threads where I've made ****** predictions and posts.
Premise still applies however. Canon (and his other sock) spend more time on this board huffing and puffing about how they're always right and the only objectionable one here and ignoring any other counter-arguments. The self-awareness is nearly non-existent. It grows tiresome.
And no, far from being a liberal. In fact, I've only voted Democrat in probably three of the dozens of elections I've participated in. But go ahead and automatically default to the tribal politicism.
It seems to be the M.O. you and so many others on here seemingly can't get away from.
I am very aware there are bad cops that overstep their bounds, and have represented a few clients against them over the years. But when an officer gives you instructions, it is typically best to follow them. What we know here is the guy had committed a moving violation. So he was rightfully detained. At that point, the cop gave him instructions he was required to follow. He had numerous opportunities to do so, but chose not to. That's on him.Buddha Bear said:Mothra said:I understand why you don't want to engage. You're getting owned on this thread.Buddha Bear said:Canon said:Buddha Bear said:
I havent really expressed an opinion either way. But the Virginia Attorney General and Governor disagree with you.
Yes. I often disagree with politicians who dress in KKK attire, wear black face and justify literal infanticide. You might consider the men you are siding with in your appeal to authority. Not one, both of them.
I forgot to thank you for letting me know the driver was both hispanic and black. That you took the time to make sure that aspect of his features was prominent while ignoring the dozens of lawful orders he ignored, while virtually invisible to the police inside his blacked out SUV, suggests you are taking a side.
Anyways, the cop that pepper sprayed the innocent man just got fired.
I've watched that video from beginning to end 3 times. The cop escalated the s*** out of that situation. He hated the fact that the driver was calm when the officer couldn't keep his s*** together. Glad a bad apple got what he deserved today.
Its a slightly better world now moving forward for the good cops out there. Hopefully these idiots can get caught more often, so that good cops can do their job correctly and get the respect they deserve.
