Interview with Ashli Babbitt's husband

3,436 Views | 116 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by TexasScientist
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Canon said:

C. Jordan said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

One is a federal officer and one works for a local police department. Different local departments handle the release of info differently.. No reason to hhhhmmmmm unless you just like to hhhmmmmm.
Just wondering why there were no protests and riots when the unarmed white woman was shot to death by the black policemen? Although Babbitt appeared to not be a nice person, doesn't her life matter? George Floyd was a career criminal and yet the country almost burned down when he was murdered.

Just questioning the disparity in the treatment and reactions of the deaths of two people where neither deserved to die.
Don't you see here was a huge difference in these situations?

Babbit was a participant in an insurrection to overthrow the government and was a short distance from attacking our congressional leaders. She pushed through a window though which she could see guns drawn on the other side.

Floyd wasn't attacking anyone and was completely subdued.

How can you not see the disparity between these situations? They're in no way comparable.


Hogwash. How many guns did the 'insurrectionists' of this supposed "insurrection" bring into the building with which to undertake said insurrection? How man police did these 'insurrectionists' kill in this "insurrection?" Is it a tactic of insurrectionists to take smiling selfies with their police opposition in the hallways of the battlefield? Is it unusual for insurrectionists to be ushered into/onto the battlefield by police officers?
They didn't need guns for the insurrection they had planned. And no, it's not unusual at all. The Turkish government suspended thousands of police on suspicion of aiding the failed coup a few years ago.
What was planned? And what coordination occurred with government entities? Any?
I don't know if there was any coordination. My point is that it wouldn't be unusual. They intended for Trump supporters in the military to join in and provide the muscle to overthrow the election and keep him in power.
Who is they and what "plan" had military people participating in this? I mean is this just some figment or unverified expectation that it would magically occur in this manner? What coordination between protesters and military personnel occurred?
It appears many were there following Q, and one of the underlying themes of Q was that on the 6th the military was waiting for Trump to call it into action to take control and bring the 'cabal' to 'justice.'
You have an unhealthy obsession with Q. You don't realize that most (by far) conservatives, Republicans and Trump supporters don't follow it, don't agree with it and don't know what the hell it is. Hell, I only became aware because of your incessant posting about it.
It's something to be concerned about, and you should pay closer attention. Look no further than the sea of Q signs, slogans and clothing in the Jan. 6th crowd. It's not so much the crazy Q and spin off conspiracies, but the willingness of a large and gullible fraction of people to believe and embrace parts if not all of this craziness.
You could easily be speaking of the liberals and their handlers like CNN, MSNBC, NYT, Twitter, etc....
That doesn't excuse what's wrong in the RP.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Canon said:

C. Jordan said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

One is a federal officer and one works for a local police department. Different local departments handle the release of info differently.. No reason to hhhhmmmmm unless you just like to hhhmmmmm.
Just wondering why there were no protests and riots when the unarmed white woman was shot to death by the black policemen? Although Babbitt appeared to not be a nice person, doesn't her life matter? George Floyd was a career criminal and yet the country almost burned down when he was murdered.

Just questioning the disparity in the treatment and reactions of the deaths of two people where neither deserved to die.
Don't you see here was a huge difference in these situations?

Babbit was a participant in an insurrection to overthrow the government and was a short distance from attacking our congressional leaders. She pushed through a window though which she could see guns drawn on the other side.

Floyd wasn't attacking anyone and was completely subdued.

How can you not see the disparity between these situations? They're in no way comparable.


Hogwash. How many guns did the 'insurrectionists' of this supposed "insurrection" bring into the building with which to undertake said insurrection? How man police did these 'insurrectionists' kill in this "insurrection?" Is it a tactic of insurrectionists to take smiling selfies with their police opposition in the hallways of the battlefield? Is it unusual for insurrectionists to be ushered into/onto the battlefield by police officers?
They didn't need guns for the insurrection they had planned. And no, it's not unusual at all. The Turkish government suspended thousands of police on suspicion of aiding the failed coup a few years ago.
What was planned? And what coordination occurred with government entities? Any?
I don't know if there was any coordination. My point is that it wouldn't be unusual. They intended for Trump supporters in the military to join in and provide the muscle to overthrow the election and keep him in power.
Who is they and what "plan" had military people participating in this? I mean is this just some figment or unverified expectation that it would magically occur in this manner? What coordination between protesters and military personnel occurred?
It appears many were there following Q, and one of the underlying themes of Q was that on the 6th the military was waiting for Trump to call it into action to take control and bring the 'cabal' to 'justice.'
You have an unhealthy obsession with Q. You don't realize that most (by far) conservatives, Republicans and Trump supporters don't follow it, don't agree with it and don't know what the hell it is. Hell, I only became aware because of your incessant posting about it.
It's something to be concerned about, and you should pay closer attention. Look no further than the sea of Q signs, slogans and clothing in the Jan. 6th crowd. Michael Flynn was reciting Q slogans. The same with Roger Stone and others. They were exploiting and encouraging extremism and extremist ideology, and Trump went to the lip of embracing Q. You should have been at the Texas State Republican Convention and you would have seen all you wanted of Q. It's a cult of conspiracy and fringe beliefs that has foot hold in the RP. The RPT in Texas is divided, and Chairman Allen West, who was run out of Fl politics, is playing to the crowd for his bid to replace Abbott as governor. If Republicans continue down this self destructive path of conciliation, encouragement, and endorsement, Democrats will be in control for the foreseeable future.
I bet you think Andy Kaufman was a threat to the Republic as well, don't you?
Ha Ha. Lame attempt at apples and oranges.
Your concern about Q and those who follow Q are as ludicrous as Q.
My family if full or Republicans and literally NONE of them know a thing about Q... this texasscientist poster is a wack job trying to convince everyone that the Republican party has been taken over by wackos. Which is funny, because that's exactly what's happened to the democrat party.

He loves to preach about Q while ignoring the threats posed by the likes of Antifa.

He's stupid liberal trying to pretend to be a republican in hopes that people purchase his BS. Sorry to break to him, I'm not or will be buying his crap.
Then your family is not actively engaged in RP politics. It's not just Q, but all of the spin off conspiracy and misinformation that is being circulated within R circles. Anitfa is not directly engaged in RP politics, nice try.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
Rawhide
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:


How is calling out a problem in your own backyard ignoring Antifa. You can deny it, but conspiracy theorists and cult followers have an influence on recent events and current politics. No one else stormed the Capitol. The rhetoric is somewhat analogous to 1930's Germany, with communism on one end, and nationalist fascism on the other. Go ahead and put your blinders back on and earplugs in.
So, where are you incessant posts about Antifa and the damage they caused over the summer? or how BLM ignores the rash of black on black crime in cities like Chicago? Because you continually post negative stories about Trump or Q or Republicans or conservatives doesn't mean you're not ignoring Antifa, it means quite the opoposite.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Osodecentx said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Canon said:

C. Jordan said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

One is a federal officer and one works for a local police department. Different local departments handle the release of info differently.. No reason to hhhhmmmmm unless you just like to hhhmmmmm.
Just wondering why there were no protests and riots when the unarmed white woman was shot to death by the black policemen? Although Babbitt appeared to not be a nice person, doesn't her life matter? George Floyd was a career criminal and yet the country almost burned down when he was murdered.

Just questioning the disparity in the treatment and reactions of the deaths of two people where neither deserved to die.
Don't you see here was a huge difference in these situations?

Babbit was a participant in an insurrection to overthrow the government and was a short distance from attacking our congressional leaders. She pushed through a window though which she could see guns drawn on the other side.

Floyd wasn't attacking anyone and was completely subdued.

How can you not see the disparity between these situations? They're in no way comparable.


Hogwash. How many guns did the 'insurrectionists' of this supposed "insurrection" bring into the building with which to undertake said insurrection? How man police did these 'insurrectionists' kill in this "insurrection?" Is it a tactic of insurrectionists to take smiling selfies with their police opposition in the hallways of the battlefield? Is it unusual for insurrectionists to be ushered into/onto the battlefield by police officers?
They didn't need guns for the insurrection they had planned. And no, it's not unusual at all. The Turkish government suspended thousands of police on suspicion of aiding the failed coup a few years ago.
What was planned? And what coordination occurred with government entities? Any?
I don't know if there was any coordination. My point is that it wouldn't be unusual. They intended for Trump supporters in the military to join in and provide the muscle to overthrow the election and keep him in power.
Who is they and what "plan" had military people participating in this? I mean is this just some figment or unverified expectation that it would magically occur in this manner? What coordination between protesters and military personnel occurred?
It appears many were there following Q, and one of the underlying themes of Q was that on the 6th the military was waiting for Trump to call it into action to take control and bring the 'cabal' to 'justice.'
You have an unhealthy obsession with Q. You don't realize that most (by far) conservatives, Republicans and Trump supporters don't follow it, don't agree with it and don't know what the hell it is. Hell, I only became aware because of your incessant posting about it.
It's something to be concerned about, and you should pay closer attention. Look no further than the sea of Q signs, slogans and clothing in the Jan. 6th crowd. Michael Flynn was reciting Q slogans. The same with Roger Stone and others. They were exploiting and encouraging extremism and extremist ideology, and Trump went to the lip of embracing Q. You should have been at the Texas State Republican Convention and you would have seen all you wanted of Q. It's a cult of conspiracy and fringe beliefs that has foot hold in the RP. The RPT in Texas is divided, and Chairman Allen West, who was run out of Fl politics, is playing to the crowd for his bid to replace Abbott as governor. If Republicans continue down this self destructive path of conciliation, encouragement, and endorsement, Democrats will be in control for the foreseeable future.
I bet you think Andy Kaufman was a threat to the Republic as well, don't you?
Ha Ha. Lame attempt at apples and oranges.
Your concern about Q and those who follow Q are as ludicrous as Q.
Except there are enough of them that they are influencing RP policy and RP office holders with their conspiracy ideology and untruths. That's the problem.
Is AOC/Squad influencing DP policy and DP office holders?
Can't you see the influence in the $6 trillion of proposals. This is the biggest cradle to grave entitlement proposal since FDR, or Johnson. We have extremists influencing both ends of the spectrum.
Agreed.
You do seem focussed on Q, though
Carlos Cruz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Canon said:

C. Jordan said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

One is a federal officer and one works for a local police department. Different local departments handle the release of info differently.. No reason to hhhhmmmmm unless you just like to hhhmmmmm.
Just wondering why there were no protests and riots when the unarmed white woman was shot to death by the black policemen? Although Babbitt appeared to not be a nice person, doesn't her life matter? George Floyd was a career criminal and yet the country almost burned down when he was murdered.

Just questioning the disparity in the treatment and reactions of the deaths of two people where neither deserved to die.
Don't you see here was a huge difference in these situations?

Babbit was a participant in an insurrection to overthrow the government and was a short distance from attacking our congressional leaders. She pushed through a window though which she could see guns drawn on the other side.

Floyd wasn't attacking anyone and was completely subdued.

How can you not see the disparity between these situations? They're in no way comparable.


Hogwash. How many guns did the 'insurrectionists' of this supposed "insurrection" bring into the building with which to undertake said insurrection? How man police did these 'insurrectionists' kill in this "insurrection?" Is it a tactic of insurrectionists to take smiling selfies with their police opposition in the hallways of the battlefield? Is it unusual for insurrectionists to be ushered into/onto the battlefield by police officers?
They didn't need guns for the insurrection they had planned. And no, it's not unusual at all. The Turkish government suspended thousands of police on suspicion of aiding the failed coup a few years ago.
What was planned? And what coordination occurred with government entities? Any?
I don't know if there was any coordination. My point is that it wouldn't be unusual. They intended for Trump supporters in the military to join in and provide the muscle to overthrow the election and keep him in power.
Who is they and what "plan" had military people participating in this? I mean is this just some figment or unverified expectation that it would magically occur in this manner? What coordination between protesters and military personnel occurred?
It appears many were there following Q, and one of the underlying themes of Q was that on the 6th the military was waiting for Trump to call it into action to take control and bring the 'cabal' to 'justice.'
You have an unhealthy obsession with Q. You don't realize that most (by far) conservatives, Republicans and Trump supporters don't follow it, don't agree with it and don't know what the hell it is. Hell, I only became aware because of your incessant posting about it.
It's something to be concerned about, and you should pay closer attention. Look no further than the sea of Q signs, slogans and clothing in the Jan. 6th crowd. Michael Flynn was reciting Q slogans. The same with Roger Stone and others. They were exploiting and encouraging extremism and extremist ideology, and Trump went to the lip of embracing Q. You should have been at the Texas State Republican Convention and you would have seen all you wanted of Q. It's a cult of conspiracy and fringe beliefs that has foot hold in the RP. The RPT in Texas is divided, and Chairman Allen West, who was run out of Fl politics, is playing to the crowd for his bid to replace Abbott as governor. If Republicans continue down this self destructive path of conciliation, encouragement, and endorsement, Democrats will be in control for the foreseeable future.
I bet you think Andy Kaufman was a threat to the Republic as well, don't you?
Ha Ha. Lame attempt at apples and oranges.
Your concern about Q and those who follow Q are as ludicrous as Q.
Except there are enough of them that they are influencing RP policy and RP office holders with their conspiracy ideology and untruths. That's the problem.
Any "misinformation" or untruths spread by Democrats and their agents?
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

TexasScientist said:

Osodecentx said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Canon said:

C. Jordan said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

One is a federal officer and one works for a local police department. Different local departments handle the release of info differently.. No reason to hhhhmmmmm unless you just like to hhhmmmmm.
Just wondering why there were no protests and riots when the unarmed white woman was shot to death by the black policemen? Although Babbitt appeared to not be a nice person, doesn't her life matter? George Floyd was a career criminal and yet the country almost burned down when he was murdered.

Just questioning the disparity in the treatment and reactions of the deaths of two people where neither deserved to die.
Don't you see here was a huge difference in these situations?

Babbit was a participant in an insurrection to overthrow the government and was a short distance from attacking our congressional leaders. She pushed through a window though which she could see guns drawn on the other side.

Floyd wasn't attacking anyone and was completely subdued.

How can you not see the disparity between these situations? They're in no way comparable.


Hogwash. How many guns did the 'insurrectionists' of this supposed "insurrection" bring into the building with which to undertake said insurrection? How man police did these 'insurrectionists' kill in this "insurrection?" Is it a tactic of insurrectionists to take smiling selfies with their police opposition in the hallways of the battlefield? Is it unusual for insurrectionists to be ushered into/onto the battlefield by police officers?
They didn't need guns for the insurrection they had planned. And no, it's not unusual at all. The Turkish government suspended thousands of police on suspicion of aiding the failed coup a few years ago.
What was planned? And what coordination occurred with government entities? Any?
I don't know if there was any coordination. My point is that it wouldn't be unusual. They intended for Trump supporters in the military to join in and provide the muscle to overthrow the election and keep him in power.
Who is they and what "plan" had military people participating in this? I mean is this just some figment or unverified expectation that it would magically occur in this manner? What coordination between protesters and military personnel occurred?
It appears many were there following Q, and one of the underlying themes of Q was that on the 6th the military was waiting for Trump to call it into action to take control and bring the 'cabal' to 'justice.'
You have an unhealthy obsession with Q. You don't realize that most (by far) conservatives, Republicans and Trump supporters don't follow it, don't agree with it and don't know what the hell it is. Hell, I only became aware because of your incessant posting about it.
It's something to be concerned about, and you should pay closer attention. Look no further than the sea of Q signs, slogans and clothing in the Jan. 6th crowd. Michael Flynn was reciting Q slogans. The same with Roger Stone and others. They were exploiting and encouraging extremism and extremist ideology, and Trump went to the lip of embracing Q. You should have been at the Texas State Republican Convention and you would have seen all you wanted of Q. It's a cult of conspiracy and fringe beliefs that has foot hold in the RP. The RPT in Texas is divided, and Chairman Allen West, who was run out of Fl politics, is playing to the crowd for his bid to replace Abbott as governor. If Republicans continue down this self destructive path of conciliation, encouragement, and endorsement, Democrats will be in control for the foreseeable future.
I bet you think Andy Kaufman was a threat to the Republic as well, don't you?
Ha Ha. Lame attempt at apples and oranges.
Your concern about Q and those who follow Q are as ludicrous as Q.
Except there are enough of them that they are influencing RP policy and RP office holders with their conspiracy ideology and untruths. That's the problem.
Is AOC/Squad influencing DP policy and DP office holders?
Can't you see the influence in the $6 trillion of proposals. This is the biggest cradle to grave entitlement proposal since FDR, or Johnson. We have extremists influencing both ends of the spectrum.
Agreed.
You do seem focussed on Q, though
Only because the misinformation effect on a segment of the Republican base is having a negative impact on policy.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Canon said:

C. Jordan said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

One is a federal officer and one works for a local police department. Different local departments handle the release of info differently.. No reason to hhhhmmmmm unless you just like to hhhmmmmm.
Just wondering why there were no protests and riots when the unarmed white woman was shot to death by the black policemen? Although Babbitt appeared to not be a nice person, doesn't her life matter? George Floyd was a career criminal and yet the country almost burned down when he was murdered.

Just questioning the disparity in the treatment and reactions of the deaths of two people where neither deserved to die.
Don't you see here was a huge difference in these situations?

Babbit was a participant in an insurrection to overthrow the government and was a short distance from attacking our congressional leaders. She pushed through a window though which she could see guns drawn on the other side.

Floyd wasn't attacking anyone and was completely subdued.

How can you not see the disparity between these situations? They're in no way comparable.


Hogwash. How many guns did the 'insurrectionists' of this supposed "insurrection" bring into the building with which to undertake said insurrection? How man police did these 'insurrectionists' kill in this "insurrection?" Is it a tactic of insurrectionists to take smiling selfies with their police opposition in the hallways of the battlefield? Is it unusual for insurrectionists to be ushered into/onto the battlefield by police officers?
They didn't need guns for the insurrection they had planned. And no, it's not unusual at all. The Turkish government suspended thousands of police on suspicion of aiding the failed coup a few years ago.
What was planned? And what coordination occurred with government entities? Any?
I don't know if there was any coordination. My point is that it wouldn't be unusual. They intended for Trump supporters in the military to join in and provide the muscle to overthrow the election and keep him in power.
Who is they and what "plan" had military people participating in this? I mean is this just some figment or unverified expectation that it would magically occur in this manner? What coordination between protesters and military personnel occurred?
It appears many were there following Q, and one of the underlying themes of Q was that on the 6th the military was waiting for Trump to call it into action to take control and bring the 'cabal' to 'justice.'
You have an unhealthy obsession with Q. You don't realize that most (by far) conservatives, Republicans and Trump supporters don't follow it, don't agree with it and don't know what the hell it is. Hell, I only became aware because of your incessant posting about it.
It's something to be concerned about, and you should pay closer attention. Look no further than the sea of Q signs, slogans and clothing in the Jan. 6th crowd. Michael Flynn was reciting Q slogans. The same with Roger Stone and others. They were exploiting and encouraging extremism and extremist ideology, and Trump went to the lip of embracing Q. You should have been at the Texas State Republican Convention and you would have seen all you wanted of Q. It's a cult of conspiracy and fringe beliefs that has foot hold in the RP. The RPT in Texas is divided, and Chairman Allen West, who was run out of Fl politics, is playing to the crowd for his bid to replace Abbott as governor. If Republicans continue down this self destructive path of conciliation, encouragement, and endorsement, Democrats will be in control for the foreseeable future.
I bet you think Andy Kaufman was a threat to the Republic as well, don't you?
Ha Ha. Lame attempt at apples and oranges.
Your concern about Q and those who follow Q are as ludicrous as Q.
Except there are enough of them that they are influencing RP policy and RP office holders with their conspiracy ideology and untruths. That's the problem.
Any "misinformation" or untruths spread by Democrats and their agents?
Sure. But not widespread conspiracies, fielty tests, and the like to the point that it is ripping the party apart.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Osodecentx said:

TexasScientist said:

Osodecentx said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Canon said:

C. Jordan said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

One is a federal officer and one works for a local police department. Different local departments handle the release of info differently.. No reason to hhhhmmmmm unless you just like to hhhmmmmm.
Just wondering why there were no protests and riots when the unarmed white woman was shot to death by the black policemen? Although Babbitt appeared to not be a nice person, doesn't her life matter? George Floyd was a career criminal and yet the country almost burned down when he was murdered.

Just questioning the disparity in the treatment and reactions of the deaths of two people where neither deserved to die.
Don't you see here was a huge difference in these situations?

Babbit was a participant in an insurrection to overthrow the government and was a short distance from attacking our congressional leaders. She pushed through a window though which she could see guns drawn on the other side.

Floyd wasn't attacking anyone and was completely subdued.

How can you not see the disparity between these situations? They're in no way comparable.


Hogwash. How many guns did the 'insurrectionists' of this supposed "insurrection" bring into the building with which to undertake said insurrection? How man police did these 'insurrectionists' kill in this "insurrection?" Is it a tactic of insurrectionists to take smiling selfies with their police opposition in the hallways of the battlefield? Is it unusual for insurrectionists to be ushered into/onto the battlefield by police officers?
They didn't need guns for the insurrection they had planned. And no, it's not unusual at all. The Turkish government suspended thousands of police on suspicion of aiding the failed coup a few years ago.
What was planned? And what coordination occurred with government entities? Any?
I don't know if there was any coordination. My point is that it wouldn't be unusual. They intended for Trump supporters in the military to join in and provide the muscle to overthrow the election and keep him in power.
Who is they and what "plan" had military people participating in this? I mean is this just some figment or unverified expectation that it would magically occur in this manner? What coordination between protesters and military personnel occurred?
It appears many were there following Q, and one of the underlying themes of Q was that on the 6th the military was waiting for Trump to call it into action to take control and bring the 'cabal' to 'justice.'
You have an unhealthy obsession with Q. You don't realize that most (by far) conservatives, Republicans and Trump supporters don't follow it, don't agree with it and don't know what the hell it is. Hell, I only became aware because of your incessant posting about it.
It's something to be concerned about, and you should pay closer attention. Look no further than the sea of Q signs, slogans and clothing in the Jan. 6th crowd. Michael Flynn was reciting Q slogans. The same with Roger Stone and others. They were exploiting and encouraging extremism and extremist ideology, and Trump went to the lip of embracing Q. You should have been at the Texas State Republican Convention and you would have seen all you wanted of Q. It's a cult of conspiracy and fringe beliefs that has foot hold in the RP. The RPT in Texas is divided, and Chairman Allen West, who was run out of Fl politics, is playing to the crowd for his bid to replace Abbott as governor. If Republicans continue down this self destructive path of conciliation, encouragement, and endorsement, Democrats will be in control for the foreseeable future.
I bet you think Andy Kaufman was a threat to the Republic as well, don't you?
Ha Ha. Lame attempt at apples and oranges.
Your concern about Q and those who follow Q are as ludicrous as Q.
Except there are enough of them that they are influencing RP policy and RP office holders with their conspiracy ideology and untruths. That's the problem.
Is AOC/Squad influencing DP policy and DP office holders?
Can't you see the influence in the $6 trillion of proposals. This is the biggest cradle to grave entitlement proposal since FDR, or Johnson. We have extremists influencing both ends of the spectrum.
Agreed.
You do seem focussed on Q, though
Only because the misinformation effect on a segment of the Republican base is having a negative impact on policy.
Thank you for focusing on the small pine in the middle of the forest. I mean it's not like dozens of policies and guidelines haven't already made their way to laws and schools and economic policies and corporate governance from extreme left ideas. But we definitely need to focus on this little sapling over here. I'll get right to it as soon as I'm finished with re-education camp to straighten out my hetero normative, white privileged, toxic masculinity, eco-oppressor, paternalistic, transphobic, caveman warped mentality.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

TexasScientist said:

Osodecentx said:

TexasScientist said:

Osodecentx said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Canon said:

C. Jordan said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

One is a federal officer and one works for a local police department. Different local departments handle the release of info differently.. No reason to hhhhmmmmm unless you just like to hhhmmmmm.
Just wondering why there were no protests and riots when the unarmed white woman was shot to death by the black policemen? Although Babbitt appeared to not be a nice person, doesn't her life matter? George Floyd was a career criminal and yet the country almost burned down when he was murdered.

Just questioning the disparity in the treatment and reactions of the deaths of two people where neither deserved to die.
Don't you see here was a huge difference in these situations?

Babbit was a participant in an insurrection to overthrow the government and was a short distance from attacking our congressional leaders. She pushed through a window though which she could see guns drawn on the other side.

Floyd wasn't attacking anyone and was completely subdued.

How can you not see the disparity between these situations? They're in no way comparable.


Hogwash. How many guns did the 'insurrectionists' of this supposed "insurrection" bring into the building with which to undertake said insurrection? How man police did these 'insurrectionists' kill in this "insurrection?" Is it a tactic of insurrectionists to take smiling selfies with their police opposition in the hallways of the battlefield? Is it unusual for insurrectionists to be ushered into/onto the battlefield by police officers?
They didn't need guns for the insurrection they had planned. And no, it's not unusual at all. The Turkish government suspended thousands of police on suspicion of aiding the failed coup a few years ago.
What was planned? And what coordination occurred with government entities? Any?
I don't know if there was any coordination. My point is that it wouldn't be unusual. They intended for Trump supporters in the military to join in and provide the muscle to overthrow the election and keep him in power.
Who is they and what "plan" had military people participating in this? I mean is this just some figment or unverified expectation that it would magically occur in this manner? What coordination between protesters and military personnel occurred?
It appears many were there following Q, and one of the underlying themes of Q was that on the 6th the military was waiting for Trump to call it into action to take control and bring the 'cabal' to 'justice.'
You have an unhealthy obsession with Q. You don't realize that most (by far) conservatives, Republicans and Trump supporters don't follow it, don't agree with it and don't know what the hell it is. Hell, I only became aware because of your incessant posting about it.
It's something to be concerned about, and you should pay closer attention. Look no further than the sea of Q signs, slogans and clothing in the Jan. 6th crowd. Michael Flynn was reciting Q slogans. The same with Roger Stone and others. They were exploiting and encouraging extremism and extremist ideology, and Trump went to the lip of embracing Q. You should have been at the Texas State Republican Convention and you would have seen all you wanted of Q. It's a cult of conspiracy and fringe beliefs that has foot hold in the RP. The RPT in Texas is divided, and Chairman Allen West, who was run out of Fl politics, is playing to the crowd for his bid to replace Abbott as governor. If Republicans continue down this self destructive path of conciliation, encouragement, and endorsement, Democrats will be in control for the foreseeable future.
I bet you think Andy Kaufman was a threat to the Republic as well, don't you?
Ha Ha. Lame attempt at apples and oranges.
Your concern about Q and those who follow Q are as ludicrous as Q.
Except there are enough of them that they are influencing RP policy and RP office holders with their conspiracy ideology and untruths. That's the problem.
Is AOC/Squad influencing DP policy and DP office holders?
Can't you see the influence in the $6 trillion of proposals. This is the biggest cradle to grave entitlement proposal since FDR, or Johnson. We have extremists influencing both ends of the spectrum.
Agreed.
You do seem focussed on Q, though
Only because the misinformation effect on a segment of the Republican base is having a negative impact on policy.
Thank you for focusing on the small pine in the middle of the forest. I mean it's not like dozens of policies and guidelines haven't already made their way to laws and schools and economic policies and corporate governance from extreme left ideas. But we definitely need to focus on this little sapling over here. I'll get right to it as soon as I'm finished with re-education camp to straighten out my hetero normative, white privileged, toxic masculinity, eco-oppressor, paternalistic, transphobic, caveman warped mentality.
The conspiracy misinformation out there is huge. We have elected officials scrambling to show fielty to the king of misinformation, reading Dr. Suess on the floor, savaging other Republicans, without developing and articulating any viable counter proposals or measures, or campaign to counter the biggest entitlement tax and spend legislation in history, not to mention the war against business and the economy being waged by the Executive Branch. Somebody needs to unite the party behind a well thought out agenda/campaign for winning back Congress, or there isn't any chance of recapturing either chamber in 22.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
Carlos Cruz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Canon said:

C. Jordan said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

One is a federal officer and one works for a local police department. Different local departments handle the release of info differently.. No reason to hhhhmmmmm unless you just like to hhhmmmmm.
Just wondering why there were no protests and riots when the unarmed white woman was shot to death by the black policemen? Although Babbitt appeared to not be a nice person, doesn't her life matter? George Floyd was a career criminal and yet the country almost burned down when he was murdered.

Just questioning the disparity in the treatment and reactions of the deaths of two people where neither deserved to die.
Don't you see here was a huge difference in these situations?

Babbit was a participant in an insurrection to overthrow the government and was a short distance from attacking our congressional leaders. She pushed through a window though which she could see guns drawn on the other side.

Floyd wasn't attacking anyone and was completely subdued.

How can you not see the disparity between these situations? They're in no way comparable.


Hogwash. How many guns did the 'insurrectionists' of this supposed "insurrection" bring into the building with which to undertake said insurrection? How man police did these 'insurrectionists' kill in this "insurrection?" Is it a tactic of insurrectionists to take smiling selfies with their police opposition in the hallways of the battlefield? Is it unusual for insurrectionists to be ushered into/onto the battlefield by police officers?
They didn't need guns for the insurrection they had planned. And no, it's not unusual at all. The Turkish government suspended thousands of police on suspicion of aiding the failed coup a few years ago.
What was planned? And what coordination occurred with government entities? Any?
I don't know if there was any coordination. My point is that it wouldn't be unusual. They intended for Trump supporters in the military to join in and provide the muscle to overthrow the election and keep him in power.
Who is they and what "plan" had military people participating in this? I mean is this just some figment or unverified expectation that it would magically occur in this manner? What coordination between protesters and military personnel occurred?
It appears many were there following Q, and one of the underlying themes of Q was that on the 6th the military was waiting for Trump to call it into action to take control and bring the 'cabal' to 'justice.'
You have an unhealthy obsession with Q. You don't realize that most (by far) conservatives, Republicans and Trump supporters don't follow it, don't agree with it and don't know what the hell it is. Hell, I only became aware because of your incessant posting about it.
It's something to be concerned about, and you should pay closer attention. Look no further than the sea of Q signs, slogans and clothing in the Jan. 6th crowd. Michael Flynn was reciting Q slogans. The same with Roger Stone and others. They were exploiting and encouraging extremism and extremist ideology, and Trump went to the lip of embracing Q. You should have been at the Texas State Republican Convention and you would have seen all you wanted of Q. It's a cult of conspiracy and fringe beliefs that has foot hold in the RP. The RPT in Texas is divided, and Chairman Allen West, who was run out of Fl politics, is playing to the crowd for his bid to replace Abbott as governor. If Republicans continue down this self destructive path of conciliation, encouragement, and endorsement, Democrats will be in control for the foreseeable future.
I bet you think Andy Kaufman was a threat to the Republic as well, don't you?
Ha Ha. Lame attempt at apples and oranges.
Your concern about Q and those who follow Q are as ludicrous as Q.
Except there are enough of them that they are influencing RP policy and RP office holders with their conspiracy ideology and untruths. That's the problem.
Any "misinformation" or untruths spread by Democrats and their agents?
Sure. But not widespread conspiracies, fielty tests, and the like to the point that it is ripping the party apart.


Try speaking against BLM or Antifa at your next Democrat rally.
Rawhide
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Canon said:

C. Jordan said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

One is a federal officer and one works for a local police department. Different local departments handle the release of info differently.. No reason to hhhhmmmmm unless you just like to hhhmmmmm.
Just wondering why there were no protests and riots when the unarmed white woman was shot to death by the black policemen? Although Babbitt appeared to not be a nice person, doesn't her life matter? George Floyd was a career criminal and yet the country almost burned down when he was murdered.

Just questioning the disparity in the treatment and reactions of the deaths of two people where neither deserved to die.
Don't you see here was a huge difference in these situations?

Babbit was a participant in an insurrection to overthrow the government and was a short distance from attacking our congressional leaders. She pushed through a window though which she could see guns drawn on the other side.

Floyd wasn't attacking anyone and was completely subdued.

How can you not see the disparity between these situations? They're in no way comparable.


Hogwash. How many guns did the 'insurrectionists' of this supposed "insurrection" bring into the building with which to undertake said insurrection? How man police did these 'insurrectionists' kill in this "insurrection?" Is it a tactic of insurrectionists to take smiling selfies with their police opposition in the hallways of the battlefield? Is it unusual for insurrectionists to be ushered into/onto the battlefield by police officers?
They didn't need guns for the insurrection they had planned. And no, it's not unusual at all. The Turkish government suspended thousands of police on suspicion of aiding the failed coup a few years ago.
What was planned? And what coordination occurred with government entities? Any?
I don't know if there was any coordination. My point is that it wouldn't be unusual. They intended for Trump supporters in the military to join in and provide the muscle to overthrow the election and keep him in power.
Who is they and what "plan" had military people participating in this? I mean is this just some figment or unverified expectation that it would magically occur in this manner? What coordination between protesters and military personnel occurred?
It appears many were there following Q, and one of the underlying themes of Q was that on the 6th the military was waiting for Trump to call it into action to take control and bring the 'cabal' to 'justice.'
You have an unhealthy obsession with Q. You don't realize that most (by far) conservatives, Republicans and Trump supporters don't follow it, don't agree with it and don't know what the hell it is. Hell, I only became aware because of your incessant posting about it.
It's something to be concerned about, and you should pay closer attention. Look no further than the sea of Q signs, slogans and clothing in the Jan. 6th crowd. Michael Flynn was reciting Q slogans. The same with Roger Stone and others. They were exploiting and encouraging extremism and extremist ideology, and Trump went to the lip of embracing Q. You should have been at the Texas State Republican Convention and you would have seen all you wanted of Q. It's a cult of conspiracy and fringe beliefs that has foot hold in the RP. The RPT in Texas is divided, and Chairman Allen West, who was run out of Fl politics, is playing to the crowd for his bid to replace Abbott as governor. If Republicans continue down this self destructive path of conciliation, encouragement, and endorsement, Democrats will be in control for the foreseeable future.
I bet you think Andy Kaufman was a threat to the Republic as well, don't you?
Ha Ha. Lame attempt at apples and oranges.
Your concern about Q and those who follow Q are as ludicrous as Q.
Except there are enough of them that they are influencing RP policy and RP office holders with their conspiracy ideology and untruths. That's the problem.
Any "misinformation" or untruths spread by Democrats and their agents?
Sure. But not widespread conspiracies
If you believe that, you're a bigger idiot than you've shown yourself to be, so far.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Carlos Cruz said:

TexasScientist said:

Rawhide said:

TexasScientist said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

ATL Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Canon said:

C. Jordan said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

One is a federal officer and one works for a local police department. Different local departments handle the release of info differently.. No reason to hhhhmmmmm unless you just like to hhhmmmmm.
Just wondering why there were no protests and riots when the unarmed white woman was shot to death by the black policemen? Although Babbitt appeared to not be a nice person, doesn't her life matter? George Floyd was a career criminal and yet the country almost burned down when he was murdered.

Just questioning the disparity in the treatment and reactions of the deaths of two people where neither deserved to die.
Don't you see here was a huge difference in these situations?

Babbit was a participant in an insurrection to overthrow the government and was a short distance from attacking our congressional leaders. She pushed through a window though which she could see guns drawn on the other side.

Floyd wasn't attacking anyone and was completely subdued.

How can you not see the disparity between these situations? They're in no way comparable.


Hogwash. How many guns did the 'insurrectionists' of this supposed "insurrection" bring into the building with which to undertake said insurrection? How man police did these 'insurrectionists' kill in this "insurrection?" Is it a tactic of insurrectionists to take smiling selfies with their police opposition in the hallways of the battlefield? Is it unusual for insurrectionists to be ushered into/onto the battlefield by police officers?
They didn't need guns for the insurrection they had planned. And no, it's not unusual at all. The Turkish government suspended thousands of police on suspicion of aiding the failed coup a few years ago.
What was planned? And what coordination occurred with government entities? Any?
I don't know if there was any coordination. My point is that it wouldn't be unusual. They intended for Trump supporters in the military to join in and provide the muscle to overthrow the election and keep him in power.
Who is they and what "plan" had military people participating in this? I mean is this just some figment or unverified expectation that it would magically occur in this manner? What coordination between protesters and military personnel occurred?
It appears many were there following Q, and one of the underlying themes of Q was that on the 6th the military was waiting for Trump to call it into action to take control and bring the 'cabal' to 'justice.'
You have an unhealthy obsession with Q. You don't realize that most (by far) conservatives, Republicans and Trump supporters don't follow it, don't agree with it and don't know what the hell it is. Hell, I only became aware because of your incessant posting about it.
It's something to be concerned about, and you should pay closer attention. Look no further than the sea of Q signs, slogans and clothing in the Jan. 6th crowd. Michael Flynn was reciting Q slogans. The same with Roger Stone and others. They were exploiting and encouraging extremism and extremist ideology, and Trump went to the lip of embracing Q. You should have been at the Texas State Republican Convention and you would have seen all you wanted of Q. It's a cult of conspiracy and fringe beliefs that has foot hold in the RP. The RPT in Texas is divided, and Chairman Allen West, who was run out of Fl politics, is playing to the crowd for his bid to replace Abbott as governor. If Republicans continue down this self destructive path of conciliation, encouragement, and endorsement, Democrats will be in control for the foreseeable future.
I bet you think Andy Kaufman was a threat to the Republic as well, don't you?
Ha Ha. Lame attempt at apples and oranges.
Your concern about Q and those who follow Q are as ludicrous as Q.
Except there are enough of them that they are influencing RP policy and RP office holders with their conspiracy ideology and untruths. That's the problem.
Any "misinformation" or untruths spread by Democrats and their agents?
Sure. But not widespread conspiracies
If you believe that, you're a bigger idiot than you've shown yourself to be, so far.
What do you call a widespread left conspiracy? Give me examples and I may agree with you.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.