Story Poster
Photo by Chris Jones-Imagn Images
Baylor Basketball

Gameday Thread: Baylor Looks to Break Losing Streak against Cincinnati

February 23, 2025
30,451

Baylor (16-11, 8-8) travels to face Cincinnati (16-11, 6-10) on Tuesday, Feb. 25 at 6 p.m. CST. The game will be televised on ESPN2.

Predictions

KenPom: Cincinnati 70, Baylor 69

Torvik: Cincinnati 68, Baylor 67

Evan Miyakawa: Baylor 71, Cincinnati 69

Haslemetrics: Cincinnati 69, Baylor 68


Coaches

Cincinnati: Wes Miller (41) 264-189 (79-54 at Cincy); 2 NCAAs

Baylor: Scott Drew (54); 483-266 overall (463-255 at Baylor); 12 NCAAs; 5 Sweet 16s; 3 Elite 8s; FF; 1 National Championship

Head to Head: 3-0 Drew


Cincinnati Starters

  • Guard: Jizzle James (So.) 6-3 205 lbs; 12 ppg; 3 reb; 4 asst; 44% FG; 30% 3pt; 76% FT
  • Guard: Day Day Thomas (Sr.) 6-1 190 lbs; 9 ppg; 3 reb; 3 asst; 38% FG; 36% 3pt; 73% FT
  • *Forward: Simas Lukosius (Sr.) 6-8 225 lbs; 11 ppg; 3 reb; 2 asst; 40% FG; 36% 3pt; 81% FT
  • Forward: Dillon Mitchell (Jr.) 6-8 210 lbs; 10 ppg; 7 reb; 62% FG; 22% 3pt; 43% FT
  • Forward: Aziz Bandaogo (Sr.) 7-0 235 lbs; 8 ppg; 6 reb; 2 blks; 67% FG; 64% FT

Cincinnati Bench

  • Guard: Dan Skillings (Jr.) 6-6 210 lbs; 10 ppg; 4 reb; 42% FG; 34% 3pt; 63% FT
  • Forward: Josh Reed (Jr.) 6-7 220 lbs; 4 ppg; 2 reb; 44% FG; 34% 3pt; 91% FT
  • Forward: Tyler Betsey (Fr.) 6-8 225 lbs; 4 ppg; 2 reb; 37% FG; 32% pt; 54% FT

*questionable with injury*


Baylor Starters

  • Guard: Rob Wright (Fr.) 6-1 180 lbs; 13 ppg; 5 asst; 48% FG; 41% 3pt; 77% FT
  • Guard: Langston Love (Jr.) 6-5 215 lbs; 10 ppg; 3 reb; 40% FG; 35% 3pt; 90% FT 
  • Guard: VJ Edgecombe (Fr.) 6-5 190 lbs; 15 ppg; 5 reb; 3 asst; 2 st; 44% FG; 35% 3pt; 80% FT
  • Forward: Jalen Celestine (Sr.) 6-7 215 lbs; 8 ppg; 3 reb; 39% FG; 37% 3pt; 81% FT
  • Forward: Norchad Omier (Sr.) 6-7 245 lbs; 16 ppg; 10 reb; 56% FG; 29% 3pt; 75% FT

Baylor Bench

  • Guard: Jeremy Roach (Sr.) 6-2 180 lbs; 11 ppg; 3 asst; 38% FG; 36% 3pt; 70% FT
  • Guard: Jayden Nunn (Sr.) 6-4 190 lbs; 12 ppg; 3 reb; 43% FG; 49% 3pt; 58% FT
Discussion from...

Gameday Thread: Baylor Looks to Break Losing Streak against Cincinnati

10,730 Views | 132 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by Johnny Bear
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They took a top 4 Houston team to the wire on the road without 2 all conference guards.
There's no excuse for tonight however.
BellCountyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Just a feeling. Think he either declares or chases the bag. Next year is likely to be a rebuilding year anyways with all the roster turnover.
Coaching staff turnover/trimming is just as needed.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TeamPlayer said:

Talent is unthinkably flowing to the SEC out of the ACC and Big 12. It's only going to get worse. Scott isn't going to be able to sustain a Top 25 program unless we outspend every SEC team in NIL, which isn't going to happen.

We still have to appreciate everything he did to get us where we are.


Team, the two best players in the country are going big 12 next year. First time teams other than Bu carrying the talent load. Az also leads for a very good player and Sampson finally hit on a few high prospects.

Now for transfers, might happen. The big 12 narrative was nonsense the last two years. Was obvious from watching the games it just wasn't there.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where the top freshman go is irrelevant imo. It's the multi year top end transfers flowing to the SEC. And they're reaping the rewards. Recruiting 1 and dones is dandy…. Doesn't win you games in March
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

They took a top 4 Houston team to the wire on the road without 2 all conference guards.
There's no excuse for tonight however.


Because they're tough as hell. But they don't have the guys to make up for missing 30+ points, nobody does.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCU 13
WVU 31

H1 5:00
saucebob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
True Grit said:

I am not sure what all those half-zipper Baylor pullovers do for the team or Drew. Seems like we have downgraded in our assistants here recently.


Can we ask all of the assistants to write down the top 5 things they did at work last week?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
saucebob said:

True Grit said:

I am not sure what all those half-zipper Baylor pullovers do for the team or Drew. Seems like we have downgraded in our assistants here recently.


Can we ask all of the assistants to write down the top 5 things they did at work last week?
Good idea, I wanna know which of them got McDonald's for the guys.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
saucebob said:

True Grit said:

I am not sure what all those half-zipper Baylor pullovers do for the team or Drew. Seems like we have downgraded in our assistants here recently.


Can we ask all of the assistants to write down the top 5 things they did at work last week?


I don't think practicing defense or layups will be on those lists
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

saucebob said:

True Grit said:

I am not sure what all those half-zipper Baylor pullovers do for the team or Drew. Seems like we have downgraded in our assistants here recently.


Can we ask all of the assistants to write down the top 5 things they did at work last week?


I don't think practicing defense or layups will be on those lists
Coaches actually said before the Colorado game that we had great practices, including those things.

Game time was, well ...
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

boognish_bear said:

saucebob said:

True Grit said:

I am not sure what all those half-zipper Baylor pullovers do for the team or Drew. Seems like we have downgraded in our assistants here recently.


Can we ask all of the assistants to write down the top 5 things they did at work last week?


I don't think practicing defense or layups will be on those lists
Coaches actually said before the Colorado game that we had great practices, including those things.

Game time was, well ...


I just cannot understand the repeated missed layups at this level. Just doesn't make sense.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is not unlucky. It's happened all season. This is bad perimeter defense.

bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I didn't get to watch a minute because I was covering a high school playoff game, but this one went about how I thought it would.

This team just isn't good. And frankly it will be stealing a tournament berth if it gets one. That bid would be far better off going to a regular season mid-major champ that loses their tournament.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Smashmouth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've waited all year for this team to show something they do well. I'm still waiting.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Smashmouth said:

I've waited all year for this team to show something they do well. I'm still waiting.


Layups
.
.
.
.
.
.
Not
Guitarbiscuit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

I didn't get to watch a minute because I was covering a high school playoff game, but this one went about how I thought it would.

This team just isn't good. And frankly it will be stealing a tournament berth if it gets one. That bid would be far better off going to a regular season mid-major champ that loses their tournament.

Agree wholeheartedly. It would be a crime to allow an 18 win team into the tournament. You just know if Baylor gets in, there are at least 15 other teams more worthy who probably had a worse SOS but who managed to actually win games.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guitarbiscuit said:

bear2be2 said:

I didn't get to watch a minute because I was covering a high school playoff game, but this one went about how I thought it would.

This team just isn't good. And frankly it will be stealing a tournament berth if it gets one. That bid would be far better off going to a regular season mid-major champ that loses their tournament.

Agree wholeheartedly. It would be a crime to allow an 18 win team into the tournament. You just know if Baylor gets in, there are at least 15 other teams more worthy who probably had a worse SOS but who managed to actually win games.

I hate to also agree - but I do and was thinking as much last night. Even given injury and illness issues, a deserving Tournament team finds a way to take care of business against the likes of Colorado and Cincinnati - especially at this point in the season. We still might somehow sneak in, especially if we beat UH (fat chance), but sadly, this is an NIT team at best.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

Guitarbiscuit said:

bear2be2 said:

I didn't get to watch a minute because I was covering a high school playoff game, but this one went about how I thought it would.

This team just isn't good. And frankly it will be stealing a tournament berth if it gets one. That bid would be far better off going to a regular season mid-major champ that loses their tournament.

Agree wholeheartedly. It would be a crime to allow an 18 win team into the tournament. You just know if Baylor gets in, there are at least 15 other teams more worthy who probably had a worse SOS but who managed to actually win games.

I hate to also agree - but I do and was thinking as much last night. Even given injury and illness issues, a deserving Tournament team finds a way to take care of business against the likes of Colorado and Cincinnati - especially at this point in the season. We still might somehow sneak in, especially if we beat UH (fat chance), but sadly, this is an NIT team at best.
This team had an easy path to the tournament. Just beat the dregs in front of you after the Arizona loss and you're in.

Teams shouldn't be rewarded for losing multiple "must-win" type games to mediocre or worse opponents. Those teams should sit their asses at home in March while more deserving teams dance.
GoodOleBaylorLine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Where the top freshman go is irrelevant imo. It's the multi year top end transfers flowing to the SEC. And they're reaping the rewards. Recruiting 1 and dones is dandy…. Doesn't win you games in March

Before we get too excited about one regular season, SEC has had exactly one FF team the last 4 Marches, B12 has won two natty, UConn has won two Nattys and ACC has had several FF team in that time.

Not arguing that SEC is not very good this year and that will probably show up in March, But let's pump the breaks a little on they are showing the way forward.

What you can take away from the last few NCs is all over the place. Very good multi year players in your program is important (BU, KU). Transfers are important (UConn 23) Recruits/transfers that were some of the best in the nation and that stayed at least two years and a one and done worked too (UConn 24).

Clearly Drew needs to get his footing again. But saying it has to be multi year top end transfers is not necessarily the path. In fact, we have one (Roach) maybe two (Omier) and how has that worked out?
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The SEC has been trending towards being the top conference for a few years now. Been a steady climb. We've reached the point where that conference is undeniably the top conference. As far as March madness goes. I don't define a 6 game tournament as what makes a conference the top dog… I refer to the 30 plus game seasons each team in each league plays. And Roach and Omier aren't multi year transfers… that's my point. Both are 1 n dones just like VJ. The strategy sucks and unfortunately Drew is finding out that out the hard way. It's up to him to make the necessary changes. But even Stevie Wonder can see what's currently being done isn't working.
Your 3rd sentence is what I'm saying.. and have been saying since Drew got away from being a developmental program. The SEC like it or not has multiple teams constructing rosters that way. And those said teams are now reaping the benefits.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Where the top freshman go is irrelevant imo. It's the multi year top end transfers flowing to the SEC. And they're reaping the rewards. Recruiting 1 and dones is dandy…. Doesn't win you games in March
I mostly agree but both KU and BYU's guy are really, really good. Close to Duke level good, who I think is the best team in the country this year. Im sure they plan to surround their guy with vets.

I'm with you that multi year transfers (proven at the lower level) are the way to go. I'm also with you that the big 12 just isn't the same level right now. I was sensing that last year even while the commentators and coaches still parroted the same talking points. 100 the SEC is a different level. I highly doubt Hou or a healthy Iowa St/Tech win that league. Its very good.

Just saying there is a talent infusion in the conference next year that hadn't been there before. BYU chose to outbid Sec teams for a freshman and Im assuming they can do the same in the portal. Will be interesting to see.
TeamPlayer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kansas is more concerning that Baylor. Absolute free fall. Players aren't good enough anymore. There really isn't anything our conference can do since NIL went into effect, and our schools don't have the resources to keep up.

Houston has been able to sustain it for now because Sampson has this emotional tie he develops with players and they stay with him. But he's loaded with seniors that won't play forever.

I don't think Drew and Self go out like Tony Bennett and Jay Wright did, although it wouldn't shock me.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TeamPlayer said:

Kansas is more concerning that Baylor. Absolute free fall. Players aren't good enough anymore. There really isn't anything our conference can do since NIL went into effect, and our schools don't have the resources to keep up.

Houston has been able to sustain it for now because Sampson has this emotional tie he develops with players and they stay with him. But he's loaded with seniors that won't play forever.

I don't think Drew and Self go out like Tony Bennett and Jay Wright did, although it wouldn't shock me.
The guys Self trusted and built up at KU over the last few years just weren't talented enough. He did more development than BU and it just didn't work.

The kid they have next year is special and Im sure they'll re-evaluate and bring in better tranfers. The strange thing to me is KU and BU both got highly ranked guys that were in demand. They just missed badly on a few of them so I don't think its stricly NIL. But the center of the game is shifting, I agree.

Great observation as Sampson isn't paying the guys full "mkt" rate and yet they stay. Its probably the most important trait in this era and somehow he's figured it out and unironicallly is the oldest of the coaches. We all thought Drew was supposed to be able to that very thing but it hasn't worked out so far.

My gut is after 22' they've gone a little on what I'll call the Aranda path (before last season) and didn't keep the main thing, the main thing. Re-center the focus on ball. You can mold great guys by going through that struggle and still accomplish his greater mission.
Oso del lago
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baylor is great at squandering success. Football team finishes top 5 then craters. Drew wins championship then bad luck for years then craters. We went too far away from what worked
chorne68
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

I'll give Roach credit. He's playing with a sense of urgency
Agree...much better.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oso del lago said:

Baylor is great at squandering success. Football team finishes top 5 then craters. Drew wins championship then bad luck for years then craters. We went too far away from what worked

And of course additionally years earlier there was the ultimate unnecessary squandering of a successful football program that was being built to be a perennial national power for years to come because of a blown out of all proportion media driven so called "scandal" that we needlessly capitulated to lock stock and barrel.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.