RMF5630 said:
bear2be2 said:
ImABearToo said:
I watched replay of KSU game again last night. Shapen came in and looked like a seasoned QB. Even announcers said the same. Moved the ball well, pin point passes and several into coverage. Watched first half of big12 champ game and same thing. I think he will make our young receivers look really good next season and all we need are a few backs than can get 400-500 reads each and Bears will be way more balanced than last year. The deep threat is back under Shapen which GB just never could do consistently. As has been said many times, Shapen won the job, Bohanon wasn't demoted.
Shapen averaged like 6.5 yards per pass attempt and led the offense to one field goal against Kansas State.
He's a talented passer, and I understand the excitement for what he can potentially bring to the passing game/offense. But I'm afraid the expectations for him a little unrealistic based on what he's actually done so far. This is his first year at a starter and he's going to experience some growing pains. I hope people can accept what he is and what he's not and have some patience as he grows into the role.
Why discuss Sugar Bowl or KState? We have one apples to apples comparison- OK St. Both on road, complete game and both had feet under them. What offense played better?
Neither performed particularly well.
With Gerry, we finished with 280 yards and averaged 5.0 yards per play.
With Blake, we finished with 242 yards and averaged 4.0 yards per play (5.9 ypp before Shapen's injury).
Shapen had the long completion streak in the first half and was ineffective late because of the injury, but without turnovers setting us up with 11-, 37- and 47-yard touchdown drives, the scores of those two games likely look a lot alike.
Neither quarterback showed any ability to drive the length of the field against that OSU defense.