parch said:
I mean... isn't that Rhule's doing though? The staff he put together? Does he not get credit for that? Both who he brought with him and who he hired from Adam?
I think this is part of the main issue here. Rhule gets dinged for having a better staff than Aranda, and Aranda gets dinged for not putting together as good of a staff as Rhule. The coach is over all of it. Staff success is HC success, and vice versa.
I just think blaming Rhule for any part of Aranda's failures is weak sauce and smacks of agenda. Rhule left Aranda with more in the cupboard than most coaches get.
"dinged" you're the one assigning values here - i'm just describing reality.
Matt Rhule was a long-time HC with long-tenured assistants in every facet of his program.
Dave Aranda was a DC who's HC career began just as the pandemic set in...
So I'm saying that Rhule's first recruiting class was far better than Dave's despite similar timelines, because Rhule came in both with a well developed staff of his own, and was gifted several Texas HC coaches with great connections.
Dave came into a situation needing to learn/develop his own roster building strategy while putting together a staff that was partially comprised of hold overs, one of whom had been the second place finisher in the job search.
That's about as apples to oranges as you're going to get.