Jimbo gone!

19,912 Views | 189 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by historian
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

boognish_bear said:

Elijah was briefly on staff here with Rhule wasn't he?




Yep...he was


Rhule already looking! He will be out of Nebraska in one year! What a guy...
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Novesrad to be an aggie?

Lololol
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I like this idea
I think they need to go with this
I mean what could go wrong?



FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gobears20 said:

I like this idea
I think they need to go with this
I mean what could go wrong?






No, Dave Aranda is their guy. They need Dave. Please, take Dave
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rhule and his family were very happy in Waco

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Rhule and his family were very happy in Waco


Until they weren't and his dream of the Carolina hills was within reach. Then, the Heartland's cornfields, his lifelong dream to make corn haylage.

He has achieved that, but what he really pictured for his family was to live a stone's throw from the Bluebell Ice Cream plant AND coach College Football. A&M can give his family that...
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There really aren't many good ways for coaches to answer these questions about openings. If they deny interest the fanbase usually won't put much stock in it anyway.

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

There really aren't many good ways for coaches to answer these questions about openings. If they deny interest the fanbase usually won't put much stock in it anyway.


Sorry, don't see Deion fitting in College Station. Boulder a better fit.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:

There really aren't many good ways for coaches to answer these questions about openings. If they deny interest the fanbase usually won't put much stock in it anyway.


Sorry, don't see Deion fitting in College Station. Boulder a better fit.


Agree. He can do much better than the cult down in College Station.
Jorkel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:

There really aren't many good ways for coaches to answer these questions about openings. If they deny interest the fanbase usually won't put much stock in it anyway.


Sorry, don't see Deion fitting in College Station. Boulder a better fit.


Agree. He can do much better than the cult down in College Station.


And his sons are out of instant transfers. They will all be at Colorado next year.
montypython
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boykin_spaniel said:

The SEC has been around forever. They've been winning championships since inception. Mid tier teams like South Carolina sell out their stadiums nearly every week despite historical mediocrity. Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, and South Carolina lack NFL teams, heck they lack any pro teams. Tennessee and North Florida just got pro teams (historically speaking). While the "it just means more" slogan is corny at best, historically it has meant more. Some people on here judge t-shirt fans but these state universities have historically been the "pro" teams for locals. They became imbedded within their states with no Dallas Cowboys, Packers, Jets, Giants, Bears, etc to compete with.
The SEC didn't win national championships at a rate higher than other conferences until after the BCS started. Then after the BCS started (which was started by he SEC) , their win rate ballooned. They signed a huge contract with ESPN/Disney, they play and beat more cupcakes than anyone else, their bowl games are almost always near their fanbases. We are told that the invitationals are playoffs and oh by the way, the SEC should always be considered to have at least 2 teams in it. It's a system that is not doing anyone favors other than the SEC.


This article is quite old - but it is a very good one and worth a read if anyone has 5 minutes to spare.

https://www.thepostgame.com/commentary/201208/better-without-em-northern-manifesto-southern-secession-chuck-thompson-sec-bcs
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
montypython said:

boykin_spaniel said:

The SEC has been around forever. They've been winning championships since inception. Mid tier teams like South Carolina sell out their stadiums nearly every week despite historical mediocrity. Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, and South Carolina lack NFL teams, heck they lack any pro teams. Tennessee and North Florida just got pro teams (historically speaking). While the "it just means more" slogan is corny at best, historically it has meant more. Some people on here judge t-shirt fans but these state universities have historically been the "pro" teams for locals. They became imbedded within their states with no Dallas Cowboys, Packers, Jets, Giants, Bears, etc to compete with.
The SEC didn't win national championships at a rate higher than other conferences until after the BCS started. Then after the BCS started (which was started by he SEC) , their win rate ballooned. They signed a huge contract with ESPN/Disney, they play and beat more cupcakes than anyone else, their bowl games are almost always near their fanbases. We are told that the invitationals are playoffs and oh by the way, the SEC should always be considered to have at least 2 teams in it. It's a system that is not doing anyone favors other than the SEC.


This article is quite old - but it is a very good one and worth a read if anyone has 5 minutes to spare.

https://www.thepostgame.com/commentary/201208/better-without-em-northern-manifesto-southern-secession-chuck-thompson-sec-bcs


SEC got better than everyone else when the Bowl System went away. When Strength of Schedule and formulas were added, it skewed toward SEC. Bama was a train wreck before that system, hell they were no different than anyone else. Than the online recruiting, BCS and a sudden lack of NCAA enforcement shot them to top. SEC is a case study in brand development and rigging the system to achieve it.
Russell Gym
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Without question
boykin_spaniel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't like the 4 team playoff. My point stands that the SEC is smart. People can complain all day but their branding has been a success. We should learn from it. I'd say we have in basketball but need to do more in football.

To anyone who hasn't I recommend attending some games. McLane is beautiful and very loud and fun when we are winning but Neyland Stadium has 100,000 fans in it when Tennessee is 7-5. And they sing Rocky Top all game long until they have no voice. Our fans politely clap and seem annoyed when if people stand up and yell at the top of their lungs.
Russell Gym
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boykin_spaniel said:

Our fans politely clap and seem annoyed when if people stand up and yell at the top of their lungs.

From what I've read on other threads, this is being enforced as policy now at basketball games. Clap politely, sit down, or else.

I guess we got too "rowdy" as Baylor Nation. Looks like "polite" Baylor Family is here to stay.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russell Gym said:

Without question
The SEC can thank 3 people...

1 - Disney/ESPN
2 - Paul Finebaum
3 - Saban's Bag Man...

Once Bama started rolling it was over.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boykin_spaniel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hopefully that is not true because if so I'm going to be getting ejected from some games…
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does Aggy deserve a Blake Eddy for having to pay out $76 million to Jimbo?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You dont say

montypython
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

montypython said:

boykin_spaniel said:

The SEC has been around forever. They've been winning championships since inception. Mid tier teams like South Carolina sell out their stadiums nearly every week despite historical mediocrity. Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, and South Carolina lack NFL teams, heck they lack any pro teams. Tennessee and North Florida just got pro teams (historically speaking). While the "it just means more" slogan is corny at best, historically it has meant more. Some people on here judge t-shirt fans but these state universities have historically been the "pro" teams for locals. They became imbedded within their states with no Dallas Cowboys, Packers, Jets, Giants, Bears, etc to compete with.
The SEC didn't win national championships at a rate higher than other conferences until after the BCS started. Then after the BCS started (which was started by he SEC) , their win rate ballooned. They signed a huge contract with ESPN/Disney, they play and beat more cupcakes than anyone else, their bowl games are almost always near their fanbases. We are told that the invitationals are playoffs and oh by the way, the SEC should always be considered to have at least 2 teams in it. It's a system that is not doing anyone favors other than the SEC.


This article is quite old - but it is a very good one and worth a read if anyone has 5 minutes to spare.

https://www.thepostgame.com/commentary/201208/better-without-em-northern-manifesto-southern-secession-chuck-thompson-sec-bcs


SEC got better than everyone else when the Bowl System went away. When Strength of Schedule and formulas were added, it skewed toward SEC. Bama was a train wreck before that system, hell they were no different than anyone else. Than the online recruiting, BCS and a sudden lack of NCAA enforcement shot them to top. SEC is a case study in brand development and rigging the system to achieve it.
I agree. I was covering a lot of years in my post and didn't detail it as much as I should have. The sec didn't really separate from everyone else until about 2016?

I feel quite strongly that the schedule disparities is what has benefited the sec the most. Everyone else plays 9 conference games now. That tacks on a lot more losses for the conference as a whole. We started playing 9 conference games in 2011. Not only that but split divisions means you get to skip some of the tougher opponents each year.

The best way to illustrate my point is this: In 2013 we lost to ok-lite. If we had 8 conference games, we may have not even played them that year. Instead, we would have played a sam houston st type school in the early part of the year and demolished them. Meaning, we would have been undefeated that season and gone to the BCS title game.

Same thing applies to 2014. What if we had 8 conference games and didn't play WVU that year? We would have been undefeated and gone to the 4 team invitationals that year.

All it takes is that 1 extra conference game to ruin a championship invite.

I realize that may sound like a lot of what ifs, but I don't feel like I am making up stuff here. We don't know what would have happened if we got to the BCS title game in 2013, or the 'playoffs' in 2014, but I think those are game changing scenarios. If we win even 1 of those it puts the Big 12 on a much better path (i.e. respect etc).
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
montypython said:

FLBear5630 said:

montypython said:

boykin_spaniel said:

The SEC has been around forever. They've been winning championships since inception. Mid tier teams like South Carolina sell out their stadiums nearly every week despite historical mediocrity. Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, and South Carolina lack NFL teams, heck they lack any pro teams. Tennessee and North Florida just got pro teams (historically speaking). While the "it just means more" slogan is corny at best, historically it has meant more. Some people on here judge t-shirt fans but these state universities have historically been the "pro" teams for locals. They became imbedded within their states with no Dallas Cowboys, Packers, Jets, Giants, Bears, etc to compete with.
The SEC didn't win national championships at a rate higher than other conferences until after the BCS started. Then after the BCS started (which was started by he SEC) , their win rate ballooned. They signed a huge contract with ESPN/Disney, they play and beat more cupcakes than anyone else, their bowl games are almost always near their fanbases. We are told that the invitationals are playoffs and oh by the way, the SEC should always be considered to have at least 2 teams in it. It's a system that is not doing anyone favors other than the SEC.


This article is quite old - but it is a very good one and worth a read if anyone has 5 minutes to spare.

https://www.thepostgame.com/commentary/201208/better-without-em-northern-manifesto-southern-secession-chuck-thompson-sec-bcs


SEC got better than everyone else when the Bowl System went away. When Strength of Schedule and formulas were added, it skewed toward SEC. Bama was a train wreck before that system, hell they were no different than anyone else. Than the online recruiting, BCS and a sudden lack of NCAA enforcement shot them to top. SEC is a case study in brand development and rigging the system to achieve it.
I agree. I was covering a lot of years in my post and didn't detail it as much as I should have. The sec didn't really separate from everyone else until about 2016?

I feel quite strongly that the schedule disparities is what has benefited the sec the most. Everyone else plays 9 conference games now. That tacks on a lot more losses for the conference as a whole. We started playing 9 conference games in 2011. Not only that but split divisions means you get to skip some of the tougher opponents each year.

The best way to illustrate my point is this: In 2013 we lost to ok-lite. If we had 8 conference games, we may have not even played them that year. Instead, we would have played a sam houston st type school in the early part of the year and demolished them. Meaning, we would have been undefeated that season and gone to the BCS title game.

Same thing applies to 2014. What if we had 8 conference games and didn't play WVU that year? We would have been undefeated and gone to the 4 team invitationals that year.

All it takes is that 1 extra conference game to ruin a championship invite.

I realize that may sound like a lot of what ifs, but I don't feel like I am making up stuff here. We don't know what would have happened if we got to the BCS title game in 2013, or the 'playoffs' in 2014, but I think those are game changing scenarios. If we win even 1 of those it puts the Big 12 on a much better path (i.e. respect etc).
The guy that doesn't get enough credit was Saban's bag man.... : )
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great Baylor Merchandise -> https://bit.ly/2M8DuHk
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ImABearToo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Taking him off my wish list. Next!
“Life is short, eat desert first!”
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




If the aggies gave away 75 million dollars just for the privilege to hire the UTSA coach; the A$M athletic director should be strapped to the top of their next bonfire .
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great Baylor Merchandise -> https://bit.ly/2M8DuHk
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Addy stop doing bonfires many years ago, at least officially. I do not know if they still have the unofficial bonfires.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russell Gym
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

The Addy stop doing bonfires many years ago, at least officially. I do not know if they still have the unofficial bonfires.

I know why Aggy stopped their bonfires. Baylor used to have modest bonfires on Fountain Mall. Anyone know when and why those stopped?
Russell Gym
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



I don't blame him for talking that position.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russell Gym said:

historian said:

The Addy stop doing bonfires many years ago, at least officially. I do not know if they still have the unofficial bonfires.

I know why Aggy stopped their bonfires. Baylor used to have modest bonfires on Fountain Mall. Anyone know when and why those stopped?

Wasn't it because of the remodeling they did of that area of campus?
montypython
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russell Gym said:

historian said:

The Addy stop doing bonfires many years ago, at least officially. I do not know if they still have the unofficial bonfires.

I know why Aggy stopped their bonfires. Baylor used to have modest bonfires on Fountain Mall. Anyone know when and why those stopped?
Yeah. Everyone goes to Burning Man instead
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russell Gym said:

historian said:

The Addy stop doing bonfires many years ago, at least officially. I do not know if they still have the unofficial bonfires.

I know why Aggy stopped their bonfires. Baylor used to have modest bonfires on Fountain Mall. Anyone know when and why those stopped?
They lowered the Engineering Department Standards... Not sure they can build a safe one anymore.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.