BigGameBaylorBear said:
Off the top of my head, the main hot seats would be Florida, FSU, LSU, Arkansas, USC, and Oregon (if lanning goes to NFL)
But Napier is guaranteed another year
FSU and LSU have insane buyouts
Not sure what USC is doing with Lincoln
I reckon Arkansas keeps their coach
Pundits are saying that the recent penalties brought onto USC by the NCAA because of coaching issues give USC the ability to get rid of CLR if they want to without having to pay out his contract since it wasn't the university that was behind the issues but the coach. I don't know if this is true or what the ramifications behind that are.
Some ND fan came on a USC football board and pointed out some article that appeared in an Irish sports report that addressed how USC has a coach who came from, what the ND article deemed, an average Big XII conference. And things aren't looking good.
I have to wonder though too because we almost lost to a pretty paltry ucla team this past weekend. After having already lost to two lower level Big Ten teams as well.
So the inference being made is that coaching in an "average" conference made this dude look better as a coach than he really is?
That would be the ND opinion, not mine, as I didn't pay much mind to his record in the XII, other than I know he lost to Baylor a couple of times (?). How did he fare against the rest of the conference? Squeakers?
Because that's what's happening when he plays the (former) PAC 10 teams, as well as the new Big Ten foes.
He may have beat the XII teams, but he's not as consistent in his new conferences.
It will be interesting to see what happens going forward.
USC scored one touchdown against ucla on Saturday evening? And this with an offensive genius at the helm. The fans are getting restless.