I would agree with your first sentence. Personal attacks are always juvenile. That's why any criticism I've ever had of him was job/performance related.PartyBear said:bear2be2 said:I would imagine that had any of those seasons required a season-closing six-game winning streak to achieve and/or followed a dismal three-win campaign, Teaff (or any other coach) would have caught heat, too. And deservedly so.PartyBear said:
Thee I meant during the seasons I mentioned where we won 8 games or more in the regular season. I also doubt Teaff was personally attacked for his appearance and personality as part of any calls for his firing in 77 or 78 like they were coming from 5th graders as we all had to endure on this board regarding Aranda over the from 2023 until a month ago.
Aranda deserves a ton of credit for leading a truly remarkable -- and frankly, unlikely -- turnaround. This season is a success by any reasonable standard. And while the last six games should change our perspective about the future -- all Baylor fans should be excited IMO -- they shouldn't be used to rewrite history. And the fact of matter is our performance from November 2022 through the Iowa State game this season was unacceptable for a program with any sort of standards at all.
Fortunately, those days appear to be behind us and we can all unite around this team and staff going forward. But 2-13 in conference can't be whitewashed or dismissed. That was a long stretch of terrible football.
And yet there is still no justification for alleged adults who are educated to personally attack the coach for his appearance, his personality speaking style and calm demeanor during that time. It should be noted the time of which you speak was not coincidentally during a time Baylor administratively fell behind again when the world abruptly changed and was not supporting its program like everyone else was.
All I'm saying there was plenty of cause for valid criticism before this current win streak. Just as there is cause for justified praise now.