5th&Bagby said:
If I were Josh Hoover, I wouldn't follow him either.
Well whoop-tee-doo.
5th&Bagby said:
If I were Josh Hoover, I wouldn't follow him either.
bear2be2 said:The success of his run game was largely predicated on tempo, too. We could maul middle-of-the-pack defensive fronts, but we struggled to just line up and move the best ones we faced. The best example of that was the Cotton Bowl, but there were others, too.Timbear said:bear2be2 said:What does that have to do with anything I just said?Timbear said:bear2be2 said:The college game has changed, and what Art did offensively with so much success over a decade ago doesn't work anymore.Aberzombie1892 said:Timbear said:
Art was beaten badly on Saturday and has a tough job getting this team on a winning track. It'll be interesting to watch.
This. It will be fascinating to keep tabs on, but whew.
Just look at scores across the country. Defenses have caught up with and are currently ahead of the offenses. And the Art Briles offense, in particular, has been neutered by rule changes and defensive adjustments.
Art will either have to care way more than he ever has about the game's other phases or innovate again to be successful in the modern era. And he's running out of time for innovation.
Art had basically a 50/50 run vs pass%, and had 1,000 yard rushers almost every year.
I never said his offenses were one-dimensional. But they were heavily reliant on a tempo you can't effectively run anymore because of changes in rule interpretation and implementation.
As we saw with both Kendal and Lebby while Art was away, the veer and shoot doesn't work nearly as well when defenses are set and ready with the personnel they want on the field.
College football has changed dramatically in the last 10 years. It's much more difficult to smoke and mirrors your way to success. If you can't line up and move a set defense off the ball, you're not going to have success running the ball. And when you can't run the ball effectively, passing games lose their effectiveness, especially once the field condenses in the red zone.
It's much more about execution now than it was in Art's heyday, when you could literally get mismatches by running faster than the defense was prepared to go.
Didn't you say that Defenses have adjusted to Art's O, and that it doesn't work anymore? I just pointed out that his run game was very good, which shatters your comment. What's with this smoke and mirrors? You take the field and score TD's, period. Doesn't matter how. Did you watch SMU? That is the Briles O.
When we could catch defenses off guard and unprepared, they were helpless. But the rules have basically eliminated that element of the game in college football.