YoakDaddy said:

---

If not mistaken a regent's kid was on the football team and pressured Briles to play him. Although I don't recall the details there were vetting and qualification issues associated with the conflict of interest accusation.

---

Go on.

bearlyafarmer said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

If not mistaken a regent's kid was on the football team and pressured Briles to play him. Although I don't recall the details there were vetting and qualification issues associated with the conflict of interest accusation.

---

Go on.

---

Those are my recollections. There are other folks on here who know details.

YoakDaddy said:

---

bearlyafarmer said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

If not mistaken a regent's kid was on the football team and pressured Briles to play him. Although I don't recall the details there were vetting and qualification issues associated with the conflict of interest accusation.

---

Go on.

---

Those are my recollections. There are other folks on here who know details.

---

Most interesting.

bearlyafarmer said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

bearlyafarmer said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

If not mistaken a regent's kid was on the football team and pressured Briles to play him. Although I don't recall the details there were vetting and qualification issues associated with the conflict of interest accusation.

---

Go on.

---

Those are my recollections. There are other folks on here who know details.

---

Most interesting.

---

Our BOFR is such a sordid mess going back decades that it would rival Dallas as a soap opera.

YoakDaddy said:

---

bearlyafarmer said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

If not mistaken a regent's kid was on the football team and pressured Briles to play him. Although I don't recall the details there were vetting and qualification issues associated with the conflict of interest accusation.

---

Go on.

---

Those are my recollections. There are other folks on here who know details.

---

Thank Yoak , don't know that story.

If regent X did such a dick move shame on him, but that is a problem with regent x, not the BOR as a whole. This guy should loose his regent card, and guys like Buddy should never rotate back on. Let's find all such things.

YoakDaddy said:

---

bearlyafarmer said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

bearlyafarmer said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

If not mistaken a regent's kid was on the football team and pressured Briles to play him. Although I don't recall the details there were vetting and qualification issues associated with the conflict of interest accusation.

---

Go on.

---

Those are my recollections. There are other folks on here who know details.

---

Most interesting.

---

Our BOFR is such a sordid mess going back decades that it would rival Dallas as a soap opera.

---

Positively brings to mind the recent mentions on this board of Texas HS coaches fired after not having started/played some school board member's kid. If this actually happened with CAB, mind you.

Let's get real about you crotchety whiners and apologists for the inexcusable that have carried on this tired irredeemable schtick for almost two full calendar years, you're on a football forum whining about a board of regents irrelevant to anything football related except to continue to gnash your teeth because they fired a football coach.

You're a bunch of thin skinned bores, and you think repetition will some how make your wishful thinking about fantasies you hold for a rightfully terminated coach magically come true which us why you're so resentful of reality checks invading your little bubbles.

There's zero reason to talk about the Bor and your 90 percent rant unless you hold the fantasy that they railroaded Briles, which you do, so spare us your concern for the regents.

Had they not fired Briles you wouldn't even be mentioning them.

YoakDaddy said:

---

If not mistaken a regent's kid was on the football team and pressured Briles to play him. Although I don't recall the details there were vetting and qualification issues associated with the conflict of interest accusation.

---

Was the regent's name Callahan?

Hate to write this because it will not reflect well on my alma mater, but ...

Sorry that some of you are just now finding out that our house has been in complete disarray since sometime around 1990. We have had petty fights among just about every group out involved in the University. It has occasionally reared it's ugly head but for the most part has played out behind the scenes. There is too much smoke to say CAB is squeaky clean, but there is too much silence to say he was unsalvagable. This was a power play/political move and there is just enough dirt on everyone that no one in power can blink. It would be cool if this was the last straw, but I honestly doubt it.

MilliVanilli said:

---

There's zero reason to talk about the Bor and your 90 percent rant unless you hold the fantasy that they railroaded Briles, which you do, so spare us your concern for the regents.

Had they not fired Briles you wouldn't even be mentioning them.

---

BS. The culture demonstrated by 90% is still there and has been there for years. You think the executive veeps are still there because they do a good job? Hmmm let's start with vetting...why would a conservative, Christian university have such leaders on its BOR? Because they love Baylor? LOL! The love of money corrupts and we are no exception. Let's see...all of this is confirmed by Google and has been verified before....a former chairman sells sex toys, his replacement as chairman wrecked a bank to the tune of $3B and was the largest bank failure in Texas history since the 1980s, one regent got fired because he falsified an expense report to his board under sex-related auspices, the regents who are in the Christian ministry have been less than transparent (the truth shall set you free!) even with their own Baylor flock, none of the regents stood up and even apologized or felt shame enough to resign - not a single one, one regent is quoted as saying he was divinely appointed to clean up the mess that occurred during his time on the BOR, one regent accidentally Responded To All on an email between his regent buddies that I had sent and he didn't realize I was on it and the disdain held by those guys for those seeking accountability was sickening. You wonder why we're so dysfunctional and the culture is bad? Just look at those leading. I fail to see how we even have a Christian Mission with that kind of leadership. You should know who your pimps are.

YoakDaddy said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

HThere's zero reason to talk about the Bor and your 90 percent rant unless you hold the fantasy that they railroaded Briles, which you do, so spare us your concern for the regents.

Had they not fired Briles you wouldn't even be mentioning them.

---

BS. The culture demonstrated by 90% is still there and has been there for years. You think the executive veeps are still there because they do a good job? Hmmm let's start with vetting...why would a conservative, Christian university have such leaders on its BOR? Because they love Baylor? LOL! The love of money corrupts and we are no exception. Let's see...all of this is confirmed by Google and has been verified before....a former chairman sells sex toys, his replacement as chairman wrecked a bank to the tune of $3B and was the largest bank failure in Texas history since the 1980s, one regent got fired because he falsified an expense report to his board under sex-related auspices, the regents who are in the Christian ministry have been less than transparent (the truth shall set you free!) even with their own Baylor flock, none of the regents stood up and even apologized or felt shame enough to resign - not a single one, one regent is quoted as saying he was divinely appointed to clean up the mess that occurred during his time on the BOR, one regent accidentally Responded To All on an email between his regent buddies that I had sent and he didn't realize I was on it and the disdain held by those guys for those seeking accountability was sickening. You wonder why we're so dysfunctional and the culture is bad? Just look at those leading. I fail to see how we even have a Christian Mission with that kind of leadership. You should know who your pimps are.

---

Strong post, Yoak!

MV needs to realize that nobody is clean in this mess.

Keyser Soze said:

---

While I agree you could find poor behavior of 20 year old kids at any program, I don't think you would find the systematic shielding of those players to the extent Briles did.

---

"I don't think" isn't particularly strong evidence for anything.

YoakDaddy said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

There's zero reason to talk about the Bor and your 90 percent rant unless you hold the fantasy that they railroaded Briles, which you do, so spare us your concern for the regents.

Had they not fired Briles you wouldn't even be mentioning them.

---

BS. The culture demonstrated by 90% is still there and has been there for years. You think the executive veeps are still there because they do a good job? Hmmm let's start with vetting...why would a conservative, Christian university have such leaders on its BOR? Because they love Baylor? LOL! The love of money corrupts and we are no exception. Let's see...all of this is confirmed by Google and has been verified before....a former chairman sells sex toys, his replacement as chairman wrecked a bank to the tune of $3B and was the largest bank failure in Texas history since the 1980s, one regent got fired because he falsified an expense report to his board under sex-related auspices, the regents who are in the Christian ministry have been less than transparent (the truth shall set you free!) even with their own Baylor flock, none of the regents stood up and even apologized or felt shame enough to resign - not a single one, one regent is quoted as saying he was divinely appointed to clean up the mess that occurred during his time on the BOR, one regent accidentally Responded To All on an email between his regent buddies that I had sent and he didn't realize I was on it and the disdain held by those guys for those seeking accountability was sickening. You wonder why we're so dysfunctional and the culture is bad? Just look at those leading. I fail to see how we even have a Christian Mission with that kind of leadership. You should know who your pimps are.

---

Sort of off topic but Baylor really has made some profoundly stupid leadership choices over the decades. Ya think that at least adhering to some part of the Baptist dogma would be a requirement. Instead, we get some of the people you list. And if it's not them, it's some person who hasn't got a clue what they are doing but likes the recognition.

Chanceux said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

There's zero reason to talk about the Bor and your 90 percent rant unless you hold the fantasy that they railroaded Briles, which you do, so spare us your concern for the regents.

Had they not fired Briles you wouldn't even be mentioning them.

---

BS. The culture demonstrated by 90% is still there and has been there for years. You think the executive veeps are still there because they do a good job? Hmmm let's start with vetting...why would a conservative, Christian university have such leaders on its BOR? Because they love Baylor? LOL! The love of money corrupts and we are no exception. Let's see...all of this is confirmed by Google and has been verified before....a former chairman sells sex toys, his replacement as chairman wrecked a bank to the tune of $3B and was the largest bank failure in Texas history since the 1980s, one regent got fired because he falsified an expense report to his board under sex-related auspices, the regents who are in the Christian ministry have been less than transparent (the truth shall set you free!) even with their own Baylor flock, none of the regents stood up and even apologized or felt shame enough to resign - not a single one, one regent is quoted as saying he was divinely appointed to clean up the mess that occurred during his time on the BOR, one regent accidentally Responded To All on an email between his regent buddies that I had sent and he didn't realize I was on it and the disdain held by those guys for those seeking accountability was sickening. You wonder why we're so dysfunctional and the culture is bad? Just look at those leading. I fail to see how we even have a Christian Mission with that kind of leadership. You should know who your pimps are.

---

Sort of off topic but Baylor really has made some profoundly stupid leadership choices over the decades. Ya think that at least adhering to some part of the Baptist dogma would be a requirement. Instead, we get some of the people you list. And if it's not them, it's some person who hasn't got a clue what they are doing but likes the recognition.

---

I'm not looking for sinless perfection (there's only One), but what I am looking for is leadership in all levels at my university that at least has a sense of common decency and no hint of shady dealings.

You don't exactly look fair and balanced when you refer to the head of a pharmaceutical company that sells thousands of products as a dildo salesmen. You make plenty of good point but that is pandering to the conspiracy fringe.

YoakDaddy said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

There's zero reason to talk about the Bor and your 90 percent rant unless you hold the fantasy that they railroaded Briles, which you do, so spare us your concern for the regents.

Had they not fired Briles you wouldn't even be mentioning them.

---

BS. The culture demonstrated by 90% is still there and has been there for years. You think the executive veeps are still there because they do a good job? Hmmm let's start with vetting...why would a conservative, Christian university have such leaders on its BOR? Because they love Baylor? LOL! The love of money corrupts and we are no exception. Let's see...all of this is confirmed by Google and has been verified before....a former chairman sells sex toys, his replacement as chairman wrecked a bank to the tune of $3B and was the largest bank failure in Texas history since the 1980s, one regent got fired because he falsified an expense report to his board under sex-related auspices, the regents who are in the Christian ministry have been less than transparent (the truth shall set you free!) even with their own Baylor flock, none of the regents stood up and even apologized or felt shame enough to resign - not a single one, one regent is quoted as saying he was divinely appointed to clean up the mess that occurred during his time on the BOR, one regent accidentally Responded To All on an email between his regent buddies that I had sent and he didn't realize I was on it and the disdain held by those guys for those seeking accountability was sickening. You wonder why we're so dysfunctional and the culture is bad? Just look at those leading. I fail to see how we even have a Christian Mission with that kind of leadership. You should know who your pimps are.

---

Basically, you're stuck with this tired agenda and projecting like it's interesting or relevant to anyone else.

Long winded repetitive diatribes won't bring a disgraced football coach back, if you want to gripe about the regents go to the politics forum.

I repeat: Keyser

The irony..you ARE what you proclaim to hate. YOU ARE A CAB'er. You explain away every accusation against the BoR as someone else's fault. You grasp to technicalities and spin. You are the same exact apologist. Nothing was the BORs fault. Despite the Ph reports, depositions under oath, etc. It was always someone else's fault or responsibility. You throw around the worst accusations against Cab, yet dismiss same against the BOR. You are blind to your own absurdity. It defines why you have NO credibility.

All were at fault. All FAILED our university in some form. Briles be dammed. The BoR be dammed. But All were not held accountable. No amount of spin will change that. You have NO high ground. You are...a Cab'er.

Keyser Soze said:

---

You don't exactly look fair and balanced when you refer to the head of a pharmaceutical company that sells thousands of products as a dildo salesmen. You make plenty of good point but that is pandering to the conspiracy fringe.

---

In this instance I said sex toys and not dildo salesman because his company also sells anal beads and other vibrators. You should look it up. We should have leadership on our BOR that reflects Christian and Baptist values; not leadership that sells Sodom and Gomorrah on the side.

Once again you've got nothing. Nobody is clean in this affair. None of the sides should be throwing stones.

YoakDaddy said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

You don't exactly look fair and balanced when you refer to the head of a pharmaceutical company that sells thousands of products as a dildo salesmen. You make plenty of good point but that is pandering to the conspiracy fringe.

---

In this instance I said sex toys and not dildo salesman because his company also sells anal beads and other vibrators. You should look it up. We should have leadership on our BOR that reflects Christian and Baptist values; not leadership that sells Sodom and Gomorrah on the side.

---

Don't knock it till you try it.

YoakDaddy said:

---

MV needs to realize that nobody is clean in this mess.

---

What dumb statement is this? This is a football forum, there's zero reason to talk about regents unless promoting the farcical narrative that they railroaded Briles out the door.

Regent failings, real or imagined, have no bearing on the 2018 Baylor football season or program.


Yet two years after they rightfully terminated a coach the same tired attempt to act like they scapegoated a football coach persists with a loud and ignorant minority on this message board.

And pretending it's because you care about lack of oversite of Title 9 by regents is just laughable.

You only care that they fired a football coach, if he had been spared you would be silent.

Beyond that, regent talk is irrelevant to Baylor football.

80sBEAR said:

---

---

Oh, does that mean you've shown up to make rape jokes?

YoakDaddy said:

---

Once again you've got nothing. Nobody is clean in this affair. None of the sides should be throwing stones.

---

Random side note/question. Why do you validate the Village Idiot by addressing him at all? No one. No one takes him seriously. Why quote him or waste your time? Put him on ignore, but please avoid quoting. Safe us the pain of seeing his dribble.

Dman said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Once again you've got nothing. Nobody is clean in this affair. None of the sides should be throwing stones.

---

Random side note/question. Why do you validate the Village Idiot by addressing him at all? No one. No one takes him seriously. Why quote him or waste your time? Put him on ignore, but please avoid quoting. Safe us the pain of seeing his dribble.

---

I see your daily obsession with a poster you swear that you're "ignoring" continues.

Me thinks you need to re-evaluate your understanding of that particular vocabulary word.

MilliVanilli said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

MV needs to realize that nobody is clean in this mess.

---

Regent failings, real or imagined, have no bearing on the 2018 Baylor football season or program.

---

AckAckAckAckAckAckAck!!!!!! This has to be the single most stupid thing you have ever posted here! Keep up the good work.

80sBEAR said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

MV needs to realize that nobody is clean in this mess.

---

Regent failings, real or imagined, have no bearing on the 2018 Baylor football season or program.

---

AckAckAckAckAckAckAck!!!!!! This has to be the single most stupid thing you have ever posted here! Keep up the good work.

---

It's always high praise when a lunatic disagrees with your posts, let's you know how right they actually are.

MilliVanilli said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

MV needs to realize that nobody is clean in this mess.

---

What dumb statement is this? This is a football forum, there's zero reason to talk about regents unless promoting the farcical narrative that they railroaded Briles out the door.

Regent failings, real or imagined, have no bearing on the 2018 Baylor football season or program.


Yet two years after they rightfully terminated a coach the same tired attempt to act like they scapegoated a football coach persists with a loud and ignorant minority on this message board.

And pretending it's because you care about lack of oversite of Title 9 by regents is just laughable.

You only care that they fired a football coach, if he had been spared you would be silent.

Beyond that, regent talk is irrelevant to Baylor football.

---

Hahahaha! Keep defending your pimps. Adios.

YoakDaddy said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

MV needs to realize that nobody is clean in this mess.

---

What dumb statement is this? This is a football forum, there's zero reason to talk about regents unless promoting the farcical narrative that they railroaded Briles out the door.

Regent failings, real or imagined, have no bearing on the 2018 Baylor football season or program.


Yet two years after they rightfully terminated a coach the same tired attempt to act like they scapegoated a football coach persists with a loud and ignorant minority on this message board.

And pretending it's because you care about lack of oversite of Title 9 by regents is just laughable.

You only care that they fired a football coach, if he had been spared you would be silent.

Beyond that, regent talk is irrelevant to Baylor football.

---

Hahahaha! Keep defending your pimps. Adios.

---

And like clockwork you expose your agenda as an apologist for the inexcusable, rinse and repeat.

You were called out for the spade that you are.

MilliVanilli said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

MV needs to realize that nobody is clean in this mess.

---

What dumb statement is this? This is a football forum, there's zero reason to talk about regents unless promoting the farcical narrative that they railroaded Briles out the door.

Regent failings, real or imagined, have no bearing on the 2018 Baylor football season or program.


Yet two years after they rightfully terminated a coach the same tired attempt to act like they scapegoated a football coach persists with a loud and ignorant minority on this message board.

And pretending it's because you care about lack of oversite of Title 9 by regents is just laughable.

You only care that they fired a football coach, if he had been spared you would be silent.

Beyond that, regent talk is irrelevant to Baylor football.

---

Hahahaha! Keep defending your pimps. Adios.

---

You were called out for the spade that you are.

---

Hey Princess! Racial slurs will NOT be tolerated here.

Dman said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Once again you've got nothing. Nobody is clean in this affair. None of the sides should be throwing stones.

---

Random side note/question. Why do you validate the Village Idiot by addressing him at all? No one. No one takes him seriously. Why quote him or waste your time? Put him on ignore, but please avoid quoting. Safe us the pain of seeing his dribble.

---

I generally don't get into it with MV because of his idiotic posts, but sometimes even a honyok has to be put in his place. I'll begin to refrain. Apologies.

80sBEAR said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

MV needs to realize that nobody is clean in this mess.

---

What dumb statement is this? This is a football forum, there's zero reason to talk about regents unless promoting the farcical narrative that they railroaded Briles out the door.

Regent failings, real or imagined, have no bearing on the 2018 Baylor football season or program.


Yet two years after they rightfully terminated a coach the same tired attempt to act like they scapegoated a football coach persists with a loud and ignorant minority on this message board.

And pretending it's because you care about lack of oversite of Title 9 by regents is just laughable.

You only care that they fired a football coach, if he had been spared you would be silent.

Beyond that, regent talk is irrelevant to Baylor football.

---

Hahahaha! Keep defending your pimps. Adios.

---

You were called out for the spade that you are.

---

Hey Princess! Racial slurs will NOT be tolerated here.

---

Lunatic gonna lunatic. Up the voltage.

YoakDaddy said:

---

Dman said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

Once again you've got nothing. Nobody is clean in this affair. None of the sides should be throwing stones.

---

Random side note/question. Why do you validate the Village Idiot by addressing him at all? No one. No one takes him seriously. Why quote him or waste your time? Put him on ignore, but please avoid quoting. Safe us the pain of seeing his dribble.

---

I generally don't get into it with MV because of his idiotic posts, but sometimes even a honyok has to be put in his place. I'll begin to refrain. Apologies.

---

Maybe you two can occupy the same safe space and console one another about how your fantasies were eviscerated by a reality check from an internet poster.