Former Baylor Football Player Shawn Oakman is found Not Guilty of Sexual Assault

106,383 Views | 505 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by TheAgentGrant
Stan Mikita
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Off to the AAF.
Stan Mikita
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How did this case ever make it to trial? What in the world has been going on in Waco, Texas?
xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oakman had a good lawyer. He would have won SamU's case.
JohnProctor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nobody wins in this one. If this kid had a family wiht a little money he would have been found not guilty within 6 months after the accusation and likely he would be in the NFL right now.

That makes 1 sexual assault conviction under Briles or am I miscounting?
CTbruin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xiledinok said:

Oakman had a good lawyer. He would have won SamU's case.


And you and I finally agree on something!!

Awesome
CTbruin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JohnProctor said:

Nobody wins in this one. If this kid had a family wiht a little money he would have been found not guilty within 6 months after the accusation and likely he would be in the NFL right now.

That makes 1 sexual assault conviction under Briles or am I miscounting?


You are correct. Wonder if it will be reported in austin and ft worth
settegast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BOUT GOT DA### TIME
Stan Mikita
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JohnProctor said:

Nobody wins in this one. If this kid had a family wiht a little money he would have been found not guilty within 6 months after the accusation and likely he would be in the NFL right now.

That makes 1 sexual assault conviction under Briles or am I miscounting?
I feel really bad for the young lady. Who in their right mind would lead her on into thinking there is a case there? She was led on for almost 3 years - since April 3, 2016. Unbelievable.
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JohnProctor said:

Nobody wins in this one. If this kid had a family wiht a little money he would have been found not guilty within 6 months after the accusation and likely he would be in the NFL right now.

That makes 1 sexual assault conviction under Briles or am I miscounting?
Not true actually. He would not have had a trial any faster than had he hired a lawyer.
Grizz Air
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hopefully he can move on with his life. Perhaps to the NFL?
2022 Adopt-a-Bear: Mark Milton #3 CB
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xiledinok said:

Oakman had a good lawyer. He would have won SamU's case.
Why is it ok for you to say Sam U should have been found not guilty but you trash Phil Bennet repeatedly for thinking he would be acquitted at his trial.
xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

xiledinok said:

Oakman had a good lawyer. He would have won SamU's case.
Why is it ok for you to say Sam U should have been found not guilty but you trash Phil Bennet repeatedly for thinking he would be acquitted at his trial.


Bennett is an idiot. He should have shut up. I think a rape charge was significant unlike Bennett who thought it was just an issue Sam had to deal.

Bennett was an overpaid sideshow.
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You spoke with him and got his opinion on rape directly from him ?

If you did not you are inconsistent for trashing him for having the same view of SamU's case you do.
Banned BarleyMcDougal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stan Mikita said:

JohnProctor said:

Nobody wins in this one. If this kid had a family wiht a little money he would have been found not guilty within 6 months after the accusation and likely he would be in the NFL right now.

That makes 1 sexual assault conviction under Briles or am I miscounting?
I feel really bad for the young lady. Who in their right mind would lead her on into thinking there is a case there? She was led on for almost 3 years - since April 3, 2016. Unbelievable.
Two assistant DA's who take an activist-like approach to a job that demands almost total impartiality? Moody and LaBorde can't hit the road fast enough in McLennan county from what I gather.
Dman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saddest part. The 3 OWNED idiots who live on this forum, all cheering for a guilty verdict (against a now innocent man) just to fit a narrative against a man no longer here...but still OWNS them. Versus letting the legal system play out.

Going through life bitter, old, and OWNED is a sad and wasted life indeed.
xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

You spoke with him and got his opinion on rape directly from him ?

If you did not you are inconsistent for trashing him for having the same view of SamU's case you do.


No, Bennett was popping off at one of the alumni dinners about Sam having an issue to deal with weeks before his trial. I guess rape charges are just an issue for the old Aggie points per possession guy.
Dman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xiledinok said:

PartyBear said:

You spoke with him and got his opinion on rape directly from him ?

If you did not you are inconsistent for trashing him for having the same view of SamU's case you do.


No, Bennett was popping off at one of the alumni dinners about Sam having an issue to deal with weeks before his trial. I guess rape charges are just an issue for the old Aggie points per possession guy.


Right on scheduke: Example A of OWNED, old, and bitter...and a sad life indeed.
xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dman said:

Saddest part. The 3 OWNED idiots who live on this forum, all cheering for a guilty verdict (against a now innocent man) just to fit a narrative against a man no longer here...but still OWNS them. Versus letting the legal system play out.

Going through life bitter, old, and OWNED is a sad and wasted life indeed.


Soft hands, should nit you be washing off Costa Rican? Did you go down their to volunteer at the orphanage or did you go down to vacation?

Wasted life would be you guys crying about us while we enjoy our afternoon.

Gotta run, my evening is starting. Don't shoot yourself celebrating.
BoonDockSaint
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Congrats to the Oak Tree...

Now...lets see him get drafted in some supplemental draft or signed by a team

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So....what's the status with SamU. Is he still waiting for a re-trial?
Brian Ethridge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xiledinok said:

Off to the AAF.


Missing 3 seasons will be difficult to recover. He has a former DL coach in the league to take a look and give him a fair shot.
Brian Ethridge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

So....what's the status with SamU. Is he still waiting for a re-trial?


Waiting another appeal
jdrs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How long was the trial? Last I heard the judge recused himself. Seems like this was quick compared to how long it took to get to this point.
CTbruin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trial was 2 days
EvilTroyAndAbed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JohnProctor said:

Nobody wins in this one. If this kid had a family wiht a little money he would have been found not guilty within 6 months after the accusation and likely he would be in the NFL right now.

That makes 1 sexual assault conviction under Briles or am I miscounting?
Technically, this doesn't even fall under Baylor or Briles anyway since all of the alleging happened after he was done with the team and with school and preparing for the draft.

It would be like blaming aggy for Johnny Football's shenanigans after he left College Station.
JohnProctor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

JohnProctor said:

Nobody wins in this one. If this kid had a family wiht a little money he would have been found not guilty within 6 months after the accusation and likely he would be in the NFL right now.

That makes 1 sexual assault conviction under Briles or am I miscounting?
Not true actually. He would not have had a trial any faster than had he hired a lawyer.
I disagree. If this were my kid this would have been done in worst case a year.

I would have pressured the system wth all I had hiring whoever I needed to be the hammer. This would not have dragged on like it did with the proper money behind it. A mill or less and this is over in quick time. And Oakman would have made that money back in one year.

But of course as soon as he was free I would have beat and disowned my kid for being such an idiot.
Stan Mikita
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EvilTroyAndAbed said:

JohnProctor said:

Nobody wins in this one. If this kid had a family wiht a little money he would have been found not guilty within 6 months after the accusation and likely he would be in the NFL right now.

That makes 1 sexual assault conviction under Briles or am I miscounting?
Technically, this doesn't even fall under Baylor or Briles anyway since all of the alleging happened after he was done with the team and with school and preparing for the draft.

It would be like blaming aggy for Johnny Football's shenanigans after he left College Station.
That's not how ESPN sees it in the first sentence of their story:

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/26106699/former-baylor-star-shawn-oakman-found-not-guilty-rape-case

"A Texas jury has found former Baylor defensive end Shawn Oakman not guilty of raping another student in 2016."

Fact: Shawn Oakman was not a "student" in 2016. But hey, you know, "details."
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's one happy looking edge rusher

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EvilTroyAndAbed said:

JohnProctor said:

Nobody wins in this one. If this kid had a family wiht a little money he would have been found not guilty within 6 months after the accusation and likely he would be in the NFL right now.

That makes 1 sexual assault conviction under Briles or am I miscounting?
Technically, this doesn't even fall under Baylor or Briles anyway since all of the alleging happened after he was done with the team and with school and preparing for the draft.

It would be like blaming aggy for Johnny Football's shenanigans after he left College Station.


You are right....but he was always lumped in all of the Baylor scandal stories in the last few years. He was the most high profile name of all the names alleged of sexual assault.
RegentCoverup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stan Mikita said:

JohnProctor said:

Nobody wins in this one. If this kid had a family wiht a little money he would have been found not guilty within 6 months after the accusation and likely he would be in the NFL right now.

That makes 1 sexual assault conviction under Briles or am I miscounting?
I feel really bad for the young lady. Who in their right mind would lead her on into thinking there is a case there? She was led on for almost 3 years - since April 3, 2016. Unbelievable.
Neither party really 'wins' in this sort of deal. It's not a great PR move if you're Shawn or the girl.

I hope both have learned from it, whatever the truth may be.
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUGWBBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Told you guys he couldn't have been in better hands.
Timbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, well, well. Another part of the conspiracy wall against Art crumbles down.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.