Kevin Steele was "transparent and open." How well did that translate to victories on the field?
Stranger said:Ewalker80 said:zunooreo said:As his bell cow to success (or not), and better jobs, Mack Rhoades has his hands deep into every detail of the football program. There are many signs of this, if you will remain open enough to see them.Robert Wilson said:CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
Who, pray tell, above Aranda really has the football acumen to make these kinds of decisions?
If you hire the guy, let him do his job for two or three years.
Chide me now....believe me later. Rhoades ran the football program this year, and will at least for the next year as well.
Sic'em
Mack made a home run hire in Matt Rhule. Maybe the only coach in America that could have turned us around so quickly. He deserves a lot of credit for that. And the book on Aranda is far from written. Could turn out to be another fantastic hire. He goes on a smoaky every week and is very transparent and open. I always enjoy listening to him. At this point my confidence in him is very high.
He turned a winning team coming off a bowl victory to a coach with a 1-11 season.
CTbruin said:
Liberty
Ewalker80 said:Stranger said:Ewalker80 said:zunooreo said:As his bell cow to success (or not), and better jobs, Mack Rhoades has his hands deep into every detail of the football program. There are many signs of this, if you will remain open enough to see them.Robert Wilson said:CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
Who, pray tell, above Aranda really has the football acumen to make these kinds of decisions?
If you hire the guy, let him do his job for two or three years.
Chide me now....believe me later. Rhoades ran the football program this year, and will at least for the next year as well.
Sic'em
Mack made a home run hire in Matt Rhule. Maybe the only coach in America that could have turned us around so quickly. He deserves a lot of credit for that. And the book on Aranda is far from written. Could turn out to be another fantastic hire. He goes on a smoaky every week and is very transparent and open. I always enjoy listening to him. At this point my confidence in him is very high.
He turned a winning team coming off a bowl victory to a coach with a 1-11 season.
There is a reason rhule is now one of the best paid coaches in the nfl.
Doesn't take away from the fact that he is being paid well.Stranger said:Ewalker80 said:Stranger said:Ewalker80 said:zunooreo said:As his bell cow to success (or not), and better jobs, Mack Rhoades has his hands deep into every detail of the football program. There are many signs of this, if you will remain open enough to see them.Robert Wilson said:CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
Who, pray tell, above Aranda really has the football acumen to make these kinds of decisions?
If you hire the guy, let him do his job for two or three years.
Chide me now....believe me later. Rhoades ran the football program this year, and will at least for the next year as well.
Sic'em
Mack made a home run hire in Matt Rhule. Maybe the only coach in America that could have turned us around so quickly. He deserves a lot of credit for that. And the book on Aranda is far from written. Could turn out to be another fantastic hire. He goes on a smoaky every week and is very transparent and open. I always enjoy listening to him. At this point my confidence in him is very high.
He turned a winning team coming off a bowl victory to a coach with a 1-11 season.
There is a reason rhule is now one of the best paid coaches in the nfl.
What's his record? Did he make the playoffs?
Stranger said:Ewalker80 said:Stranger said:Ewalker80 said:zunooreo said:As his bell cow to success (or not), and better jobs, Mack Rhoades has his hands deep into every detail of the football program. There are many signs of this, if you will remain open enough to see them.Robert Wilson said:CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
Who, pray tell, above Aranda really has the football acumen to make these kinds of decisions?
If you hire the guy, let him do his job for two or three years.
Chide me now....believe me later. Rhoades ran the football program this year, and will at least for the next year as well.
Sic'em
Mack made a home run hire in Matt Rhule. Maybe the only coach in America that could have turned us around so quickly. He deserves a lot of credit for that. And the book on Aranda is far from written. Could turn out to be another fantastic hire. He goes on a smoaky every week and is very transparent and open. I always enjoy listening to him. At this point my confidence in him is very high.
He turned a winning team coming off a bowl victory to a coach with a 1-11 season.
There is a reason rhule is now one of the best paid coaches in the nfl.
What's his record? Did he make the playoffs?
I still rate Ian McCaw a better Baylor A.D. than Mack Rhoades. If the new basketball pavilion is built in the 2-3 years, I could change my mind.PartyBear said:
I have thought Rhoades was a good AD and have defended him here. However if he is behind the post season moves here, my view on the matter will change.
True Grit said:
Looks like Austin Thomas is heading back to LSU... guess Orgeron wanted him back pretty badly.
Hubbs said:True Grit said:
Looks like Austin Thomas is heading back to LSU... guess Orgeron wanted him back pretty badly.
Austin Thomas and LSU's AD Scott Woodward are tight. When Woodward was hired at A&M, he hired Thomas there. Woodward made the move to LSU and brought Thomas back to help Orgeron. Not everything is a conspiracy theory.
If you have sources, what need do you have to 'speculate' unless your 'sources' are themselves speculating? #confusedCTbruin said:LIB,MR BEARS said:Is this your speculation or do you actually have a source?CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
There is some speculation involved, but still have some decent sources
BUbearinARK said:If you have sources, what need do you have to 'speculate' unless your 'sources' are themselves speculating? #confusedCTbruin said:LIB,MR BEARS said:Is this your speculation or do you actually have a source?CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
There is some speculation involved, but still have some decent sources
Please clarify
Are you going to hold your breath on this one? I mean it's CTbruin we're talking about here.BUbearinARK said:If you have sources, what need do you have to 'speculate' unless your 'sources' are themselves speculating? #confusedCTbruin said:LIB,MR BEARS said:Is this your speculation or do you actually have a source?CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
There is some speculation involved, but still have some decent sources
Please clarify
Thanks for your input. Long way to say, pure speculation.CTbruin said:BUbearinARK said:If you have sources, what need do you have to 'speculate' unless your 'sources' are themselves speculating? #confusedCTbruin said:LIB,MR BEARS said:Is this your speculation or do you actually have a source?CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
There is some speculation involved, but still have some decent sources
Please clarifyThis is a complex situation. My source has been very good over the years. But my source could have speculated some.
I was comfortable enough with what I heard to say I thinksome of the decisions came from above.
CTbruin said:BUbearinARK said:If you have sources, what need do you have to 'speculate' unless your 'sources' are themselves speculating? #confusedCTbruin said:LIB,MR BEARS said:Is this your speculation or do you actually have a source?CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
There is some speculation involved, but still have some decent sources
Please clarify
This is a complex situation. My source has been very good over the years. But my source could have speculated some.
I was comfortable enough with what I heard to say I think some of the decisions came from above.
That's it
Gunny Hartman said:CTbruin said:BUbearinARK said:If you have sources, what need do you have to 'speculate' unless your 'sources' are themselves speculating? #confusedCTbruin said:LIB,MR BEARS said:Is this your speculation or do you actually have a source?CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
There is some speculation involved, but still have some decent sources
Please clarify
This is a complex situation. My source has been very good over the years. But my source could have speculated some.
I was comfortable enough with what I heard to say I think some of the decisions came from above.
That's it
You don't have any sources. You just have a bunch of fellow busybodies who sit around and gossip more than a knitting circle.
Timbear said:
It seems logical that a new, first time HC who kept playing a 4 yr, 9th ranked QB, during an 8 out of 9 game losing streak, would need help making these kinds of decisions. But, we'll never know.
Gunny Hartman said:Timbear said:
It seems logical that a new, first time HC who kept playing a 4 yr, 9th ranked QB, during an 8 out of 9 game losing streak, would need help making these kinds of decisions. But, we'll never know.
No, we definitely know. Football staff hiring and firing decisions are 100% the realm of Aranda. This is how Mack has always operated as an AD, and after a couple of decades in the business, he didn't suddenly wake up one morning and decide to change that.
Ignore the half wits that say otherwise, because they just enjoy pretending they have Insider access that they most definitely do not have.
Wow. Lots of cockroaches scrambling out of the woodwork in this thread!zunooreo said:
Asst AD for Football operations is leaving the program now as well, at just under one year in the job. This is Aranda's (literal) right hand man with running everything about the program's operations.....other than coaching players and calling plays. And it is important to make sure you understand that this guy has had a long term professional relationship with Aranda. A good one. They are friends. So, this move is foretelling.....just letting you know.
Stay tuned for an interesting Year 2 of Aranda's struggle to rise into a head coach. And Mack Rhoades continued below average performance as a D-I P5 AD.
Sic'em
One thing I do know is that you've consistently demonstrated you know nothing!Timbear said:
It seems logical that a new, first time HC who kept playing a 4 yr, 9th ranked QB, during an 8 out of 9 game losing streak, would need help making these kinds of decisions. But, we'll never know.
Your "source."CTbruin said:BUbearinARK said:If you have sources, what need do you have to 'speculate' unless your 'sources' are themselves speculating? #confusedCTbruin said:LIB,MR BEARS said:Is this your speculation or do you actually have a source?CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
There is some speculation involved, but still have some decent sources
Please clarify
This is a complex situation. My source has been very good over the years. But my source could have speculated some.
I was comfortable enough with what I heard to say I think some of the decisions came from above.
That's it
It's his coffee group at McDonald's!Gunny Hartman said:CTbruin said:BUbearinARK said:If you have sources, what need do you have to 'speculate' unless your 'sources' are themselves speculating? #confusedCTbruin said:LIB,MR BEARS said:Is this your speculation or do you actually have a source?CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
There is some speculation involved, but still have some decent sources
Please clarify
This is a complex situation. My source has been very good over the years. But my source could have speculated some.
I was comfortable enough with what I heard to say I think some of the decisions came from above.
That's it
You don't have any sources. You just have a bunch of fellow busybodies who sit around and gossip more than a knitting circle.
PartyBear said:
I don't know CT personally or at least I don't think I do. But he goes all the way back to the mid 90s and Austin 365. His credibility level isn't bad.
Gunny Hartman said:CTbruin said:BUbearinARK said:If you have sources, what need do you have to 'speculate' unless your 'sources' are themselves speculating? #confusedCTbruin said:LIB,MR BEARS said:Is this your speculation or do you actually have a source?CTbruin said:
It concerns many of us that hear that changes being made (and there have been 5 or 6) are not being made by Aranda, but above his head. That means Aranda will not be here long.
There is some speculation involved, but still have some decent sources
Please clarify
This is a complex situation. My source has been very good over the years. But my source could have speculated some.
I was comfortable enough with what I heard to say I think some of the decisions came from above.
That's it
You don't have any sources. You just have a bunch of fellow busybodies who sit around and gossip more than a knitting circle.
You seem to use cluless fairly freely. I'm not sure you are as astute at discerning 'clueless' as you think you are.Timbear said:
I said "But no one knows", right. Just the eye test tells you that a HC as clueless as Randa appeared to be on O, it logically would not be a shock if Rhoades was consulting with him on these staff changes. I see that the Board of Snakes woke Truett up and sent him back over here. For him to use the name "George Truett" borders on Blasphemy.
...and then summarily dismiss it.74Bear said:PartyBear said:
I don't know CT personally or at least I don't think I do. But he goes all the way back to the mid 90s and Austin 365. His credibility level isn't bad.
I would listen to what he says