Unc tough year during the year and made a big run in the ncaa.
We've had brutal draws the last few years. Thankfully the team in 21' was so good it didn't matter.DanaDane said:
North Carolina, Illinois or Kentucky.
And as a 2 seed, there's a good chance we'll get one of them in the Round of 32.
IowaBear said:
Baylor's going to be an 8 seed?
Smashmouth said:
I don't know who this years North Carolina is but I would say they come from the Big East or the Big Ten. Those conferences have been beating each other up so there is a high speed in there that is going to peak at the right time.
Kentucky lost to Vanderbilt AT HOME tonight - wow, can't figure that team out, definitely Jekell & Hyde. I think Illinois is similar to Kentucky in that sense, one night they look like they could beat anyone and then the next game they can lay an egg.Quinton said:We've had brutal draws the last few years. Thankfully the team in 21' was so good it didn't matter.DanaDane said:
North Carolina, Illinois or Kentucky.
And as a 2 seed, there's a good chance we'll get one of them in the Round of 32.
Any 1-2 that draws UK, Unc (if they make it), a relatively healthy Arkansas, or TCU (if they fall past 6) is going to have potential problems. Don't know enough about Illinois. Many would be matchup problems for most of the 1-2s this year.
Yep, they are up and down but when they are up, they are tough. Looked like they could have fallen to an 8 at one time but with the win tonight they won't fortunately for the #1s. On their game I think they would be a nightmare for a Purdue or a Houston.DanaDane said:
TCU is just a really tough match up for anyone because they have size, they have depth, they have the ability to go from small to large or vice versa, and they are really good in transition. The problem for them will be turnovers and those weird lack of scoring stretches they go through because outside of Miles they really don't have many pure shooters.
They're streaky and have dealt with some injuries as well. We all know the limitations of Cal rolling out the ball at times too. I haven't kept up to date on seedings but looks like they will end a little higher although this loss could get them closer to an 8. Could easily rise up and test a team or could get knocked out in the 1st round just as easily.Jayman1963 said:Kentucky lost to Vanderbilt AT HOME tonight - wow, can't figure that team out, definitely Jekell & Hyde. I think Illinois is similar to Kentucky in that sense, one night they look like they could beat anyone and then the next game they can lay an egg.Quinton said:We've had brutal draws the last few years. Thankfully the team in 21' was so good it didn't matter.DanaDane said:
North Carolina, Illinois or Kentucky.
And as a 2 seed, there's a good chance we'll get one of them in the Round of 32.
Any 1-2 that draws UK, Unc (if they make it), a relatively healthy Arkansas, or TCU (if they fall past 6) is going to have potential problems. Don't know enough about Illinois. Many would be matchup problems for most of the 1-2s this year.
I agree. I think both those teams in their own way could execute on that discipline gameplan you described.. but I would be concerned about either one of them. I think a Villanova from a year or two ago would really match up well against a team like Tcu. They would frustrate and grind out a team like Tcu with their methodical tough style. They would also have enough athletes and skilled guards to match.DanaDane said:
Fully agree on Purdue and Houston. Purdue, in particular.
On the flip side, I could also see them going out early against a really fundamental, disciplined, good shooting team that could take them out of their transition game and take advantage of TCU's careless ball handling and passing.
That's what I love about the tournament. It's a lot about the matchups you get.
Did somebody say it's March?
— Baylor Men’s Basketball (@BaylorMBB) March 1, 2023
🎧 @MarchMadnessMBB #SicEm | #CultureofJOY pic.twitter.com/NACYmIsNOu