Who do you think this years North Carolina is?

1,784 Views | 27 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by oso de esqui
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
Unc tough year during the year and made a big run in the ncaa.
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hell .it could be them again..
EvilTroyAndAbed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Could be Arkansas. They may not have enough time to gel with Nick Smith, but he's shown some incredible flashes in the last two weeks since he's been back. They'll most likely be seeded anywhere from 7-10.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
North Carolina, Illinois or Kentucky.

And as a 2 seed, there's a good chance we'll get one of them in the Round of 32.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baylor
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baylor's going to be an 8 seed?
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DanaDane said:

North Carolina, Illinois or Kentucky.

And as a 2 seed, there's a good chance we'll get one of them in the Round of 32.
We've had brutal draws the last few years. Thankfully the team in 21' was so good it didn't matter.

Any 1-2 that draws UK, Unc (if they make it), a relatively healthy Arkansas, or TCU (if they fall past 6) is going to have potential problems. Don't know enough about Illinois. Many would be matchup problems for most of the 1-2s this year.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Baylor's going to be an 8 seed?


I was thinking of an unexpected team making it all the way to the championship game.

It was a lame joke.
Smashmouth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't know who this years North Carolina is but I would say they come from the Big East or the Big Ten. Those conferences have been beating each other up so there is a high speed in there that is going to peak at the right time.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Smashmouth said:

I don't know who this years North Carolina is but I would say they come from the Big East or the Big Ten. Those conferences have been beating each other up so there is a high speed in there that is going to peak at the right time.

You could of course say the same thing about the B12. I agree that TCU with a healthy Miles could be a dangerous team capable of making a FF run.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The B10 is garbage. I was high on Purdue 3 weeks ago but they're average at best.
EvilTroyAndAbed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After last night's game, I could be wrong about Arkansas. They looked like garbage.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tenn is legit defensively. They're pretty bad offensively but defensively they can shut down anyone. Arky with the right matchups can make a big run. Tenn is a bad matchup for them
Chamberman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There will be no 8 seeds in the Final Four this year.
GruntTuff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCU. Duke's playing a lot better. No one's going to want to play TCU.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They gave Miles back. Very predictable.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCU is just a really tough match up for anyone because they have size, they have depth, they have the ability to go from small to large or vice versa, and they are really good in transition. The problem for them will be turnovers and those weird lack of scoring stretches they go through because outside of Miles they really don't have many pure shooters.
Jayman1963
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quinton said:

DanaDane said:

North Carolina, Illinois or Kentucky.

And as a 2 seed, there's a good chance we'll get one of them in the Round of 32.
We've had brutal draws the last few years. Thankfully the team in 21' was so good it didn't matter.

Any 1-2 that draws UK, Unc (if they make it), a relatively healthy Arkansas, or TCU (if they fall past 6) is going to have potential problems. Don't know enough about Illinois. Many would be matchup problems for most of the 1-2s this year.
Kentucky lost to Vanderbilt AT HOME tonight - wow, can't figure that team out, definitely Jekell & Hyde. I think Illinois is similar to Kentucky in that sense, one night they look like they could beat anyone and then the next game they can lay an egg.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UK lost because their only PG, Cason Wallace, got hurt with 19 minutes to go and was lost for the game. The other PG was already out with an injury. It's an In-Out offense based on the PG being able to feed Oscar or Toppin, or the bigs flipping it back out to Wallace of Wheeler. Suddenly they didn't have anyone who could dribble or distribute.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DanaDane said:

TCU is just a really tough match up for anyone because they have size, they have depth, they have the ability to go from small to large or vice versa, and they are really good in transition. The problem for them will be turnovers and those weird lack of scoring stretches they go through because outside of Miles they really don't have many pure shooters.
Yep, they are up and down but when they are up, they are tough. Looked like they could have fallen to an 8 at one time but with the win tonight they won't fortunately for the #1s. On their game I think they would be a nightmare for a Purdue or a Houston.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fully agree on Purdue and Houston. Purdue, in particular.

On the flip side, I could also see them going out early against a really fundamental, disciplined, good shooting team that could take them out of their transition game and take advantage of TCU's careless ball handling and passing.

That's what I love about the tournament. It's a lot about the matchups you get.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jayman1963 said:

Quinton said:

DanaDane said:

North Carolina, Illinois or Kentucky.

And as a 2 seed, there's a good chance we'll get one of them in the Round of 32.
We've had brutal draws the last few years. Thankfully the team in 21' was so good it didn't matter.

Any 1-2 that draws UK, Unc (if they make it), a relatively healthy Arkansas, or TCU (if they fall past 6) is going to have potential problems. Don't know enough about Illinois. Many would be matchup problems for most of the 1-2s this year.
Kentucky lost to Vanderbilt AT HOME tonight - wow, can't figure that team out, definitely Jekell & Hyde. I think Illinois is similar to Kentucky in that sense, one night they look like they could beat anyone and then the next game they can lay an egg.
They're streaky and have dealt with some injuries as well. We all know the limitations of Cal rolling out the ball at times too. I haven't kept up to date on seedings but looks like they will end a little higher although this loss could get them closer to an 8. Could easily rise up and test a team or could get knocked out in the 1st round just as easily.

Another set of teams in general I would be hesitant to see early are the big east teams. The environment and style of play they run through in conference is underrated in my view and very tough.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DanaDane said:

Fully agree on Purdue and Houston. Purdue, in particular.

On the flip side, I could also see them going out early against a really fundamental, disciplined, good shooting team that could take them out of their transition game and take advantage of TCU's careless ball handling and passing.

That's what I love about the tournament. It's a lot about the matchups you get.
I agree. I think both those teams in their own way could execute on that discipline gameplan you described.. but I would be concerned about either one of them. I think a Villanova from a year or two ago would really match up well against a team like Tcu. They would frustrate and grind out a team like Tcu with their methodical tough style. They would also have enough athletes and skilled guards to match.

I think Purdue due to the footspeed of Tcu and the toughness would struggle a bit.

I mention Houston because of their hyper aggressive defensive style. If they catch Tcu on a sloppy day.. would be fine. If they catch them with a Miles On day.. they have the guards, size, insane conditioning, and toughness to really put Houston's style to the test and gas them out (or foul them out with relentless downhill pressure.

You never know who shows up due to their inconsistency on offense and their mediocre outside shot. But they are tested and I would not want to see Tcu specifically if I was either of those teams.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've seen a few brackets that would have us running into Providence in the R32. Not sure that's who I want to see across from us.
Quinton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nope..it isn't. The big east because of the regional rivalries is a tough and intense environment. Those teams are tested in my opinion and a little underrated/overlooked. Would not want to see a big east team in the second round. Even if a Creigton were to fall to a 7 would not be great. Both of those teams are good, solid, teams that would be a struggle.

But I see Duke is also projected as a 7 which is another team that I sense might peak at the end. The matchups this year are going to be tough almost any way you get it.

gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
oso de esqui
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've seen brackets with us versus Kentucky in the 2nd round. So, I figure Kentucky is this year's North Carolina.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.