Lunardi seeds updated

18,882 Views | 164 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by oldbear69
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a tough draw for Purdue. Kentucky is a nightmare matchup for them in the S16 ( assuming both get that far)
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Pitt's woes (& Clemson's) have nothing to do with the Big 12 or any other conference. It's entirely their own. If they don't get into the tournament it's entirely because they did not earn it. Same with any other potential bubble team or team that thinks they should be in the bubble.

It's not only about who one CB plays non conference, it's also the record of wins & losses. One could even argue that the Big 12 gauntlet makes up somewhat from playing too many cupcakes. It would be a lame excuse for poor scheduling but it has some truth.

In the end, the committee should use Net rankings and maybe KenPom, Torvik, EvanMiya, etc to decide & let the chips fall where they may. I certainly hope they won't be influenced by the whining of some coaches.
Clemson's a lock for the tournament. They've put together a good resume against a good schedule this year.

Other than the fact that they were left out last year, I'm not sure why Brownell is being such a baby, to be honest. It almost seems like there's a directive from the league for ACC coaches to trash the Big 12 in an effort to get more teams into the field.
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

historian said:

Pitt's woes (& Clemson's) have nothing to do with the Big 12 or any other conference. It's entirely their own. If they don't get into the tournament it's entirely because they did not earn it. Same with any other potential bubble team or team that thinks they should be in the bubble.

It's not only about who one CB plays non conference, it's also the record of wins & losses. One could even argue that the Big 12 gauntlet makes up somewhat from playing too many cupcakes. It would be a lame excuse for poor scheduling but it has some truth.

In the end, the committee should use Net rankings and maybe KenPom, Torvik, EvanMiya, etc to decide & let the chips fall where they may. I certainly hope they won't be influenced by the whining of some coaches.
Clemson's a lock for the tournament. They've put together a good resume against a good schedule this year.

Other than the fact that they were left out last year, I'm not sure why Brownell is being such a baby, to be honest. It almost seems like there's a directive from the league for ACC coaches to trash the Big 12 in an effort to get more teams into the field.
Sounds plausible, since the ACC is only about 5-6 deep in quality teams this year (compared to the Big12's 8-10).
Baylorburke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Parsed Sports has us a 3 Seed and making it to Sweet 16. Funny enough it has Clemson in Final Four. Its a live bracket so literally changes after each round of daily games, but still fun to check out. Go bears!
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
TXBEAR_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I could see Marquette dropping off the 2 line and Baylor sliding in that spot, but obviously have to win at Tech.
Bear living in the woods of Bend Oregon
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXBEAR_bf said:

I could see Marquette dropping off the 2 line and Baylor sliding in that spot, but obviously have to win at Tech.
CBS, I think, is already showing the bears as a 2 seed
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They'd be silly to play him. If they're doing anything in the dance they'll need him.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unless a team has a shot to move down a seed, they need to give their banged up studs some extra rest.

Baylor is already guaranteed a double-bye for the conference tourney. There is nothing to be gained by playing Love Saturday vs Tech.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXBEAR_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure how Iowa State is ahead of us on the 3 seed line? They lost to a sub 500 K state team and we lost to the 4 th place team in our league. Creighton losing would have helped us, so close.
Bear living in the woods of Bend Oregon
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Unless a team has a shot to move down a seed, they need to give their banged up studs some extra rest.

Baylor is already guaranteed a double-bye for the conference tourney. There is nothing to be gained by playing Love Saturday vs Tech.


So Of Course we play him. Know the rust off. Right or wrong? Who knows
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Unless a team has a shot to move down a seed, they need to give their banged up studs some extra rest.

Baylor is already guaranteed a double-bye for the conference tourney. There is nothing to be gained by playing Love Saturday vs Tech.


So Of Course we play him. Know the rust off. Right or wrong? Who knows
Agreed. He showed flashes Saturday, but there was some obvious ring rust. Better to knock the rest of that off before the important tournament.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Unless a team has a shot to move down a seed, they need to give their banged up studs some extra rest.

Baylor is already guaranteed a double-bye for the conference tourney. There is nothing to be gained by playing Love Saturday vs Tech.


So Of Course we play him. Know the rust off. Right or wrong? Who knows
Agreed. He showed flashes Saturday, but there was some obvious ring rust. Better to knock the rest of that off before the important tournament.


Agreed. If he's healthy, players gotta play
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXBEAR_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How in the world does he have UNC ahead of Houston? That makes zero sense.
Jerry Palm has us as a two seed, but obviously we have to win tonight to keep that.
Bear living in the woods of Bend Oregon
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXBEAR_bf said:

How in the world does he have UNC ahead of Houston? That makes zero sense.
Jerry Palm has us as a two seed, but obviously we have to win tonight to keep that.


He doesn't. It's kind of confusing how he lists them. If you look at the seed numbers though you will see he has UH #3 and UNC #4.
TXBEAR_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Got it, my mistake. Damn mid 40 eyesight.
Bear living in the woods of Bend Oregon
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's go Bulldogs

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lunardi had Tenn as the top 2 seed.

They just got bounced by Miss St by 17 points. They came in as a 9.5 favorite.

Not sure how much the loss will impact them.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lunardi did not drop Tenn much

TXBEAR_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gott take down ISU and hang tight with Houston to get that 2.
Bear living in the woods of Bend Oregon
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




He's the mbb equivalent of ARod (who was derisively nicknamed "Mr. May")
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How does he keep Arizona and ISU in the same spots after today's results?

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Latest

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.