It doesn't look like this is going to be settled for a day or two, so might as well speculate. I for one would hate to see him leave, but if he does...who's up?
If we can't get McCasland and Tang in that order, my next call would be to Bucky McMillan at Samford. He took over a dreadful program and turned them around in two years. And he's only sustained/built on that success since.boykin_spaniel said:
I'd imagine Tang and McCasland would be the first two calls. After that it would be a toss up. Lot of the top mid major coaches already took jobs. Medved at Colorado State? Randy Bennett at St. Mary's? Does a booster step up and try to poach Mark Few or some other big name?
stan albeckStefano DiMera said:
Bob Huggins
The Ghost of Jerry Tarkanian
Gene Iba
Tony Barone
Rajon Rondo
In no particular order.
A Man After My Own Heartburg0047 said:
Bryce Drew. A 2 for 1 package and Molly finally lands where she belongs
No love for Harry Miller?Stefano DiMera said:
Bob Huggins
The Ghost of Jerry Tarkanian
Gene Iba
Tony Barone
Rajon Rondo
In no particular order.
I was hoping Mack would hire Bryce Drew as our WBB head coach post Mulkey.burg0047 said:
Bryce Drew. A 2 for 1 package and Molly finally lands where she belongs.
Perhaps Quevyn is ready to coach...Mitch Henessey said:
Darrell Arthur. The man is guided by dreams, and Baylor Basketball is where dreams can come true.
guadalupeoso said:
Tang would be my first option, then McCasland. Would be fine with either. I don't see a world where we don't get one of those guys, but if we have to move outside of those two I would look towards Lake Charles.
Yea, it's kind of a depressing thought to know that this may be all on Mack's shoulders to handle.IvanBear said:guadalupeoso said:
Tang would be my first option, then McCasland. Would be fine with either. I don't see a world where we don't get one of those guys, but if we have to move outside of those two I would look towards Lake Charles.
I don't underestimate Mack's ability to f this up. No replacement coach will get the NIL support drew does,
I mean yeah, nobody wants to stay in Manhattan or Lubbock long if they have any say in the matter. I honestly think both would come back if we pushed hard enough, especially at this time of year. I think it's mostly about which coach feels like the bridge will be less burned by leaving.Bleed Green said:
I see your point on McCasland but the Raiders I know feel like McCasland will go if Baylor comes calling. Only one of them are heavily connected into the athletic department, but I would bet they represent the general consensus of Tech fans.
On what are you basing your better coach assessment? McCasland has more experience and success as a head coach than Tang, who has gotten a whole lot of mileage out of one good season.GoodOleBaylorLine said:
My preference would be Tang. Better coach and a better recruiter. Would also be more likely to maintain the culture of the program.
My guess is neither would jump at this point.
What conviction are you referencing? I think you're mixing up the Tech basketball and Arizona football situations.PartyBear said:
I dont see how Macasland works. He really screwed himself up not just from our vantage point but from that of many other programs as well by playing a guy with a sex assault conviction or the equivalent thereof for juveniles from a few years ago. He also attempted to act like that court proceeding never happened. Not good.
I dont see how we can even enter talks with him and I will personally question alot of things from 2016 to present if we do.