At home. Down 10 with under 20 seconds to go.
Couldn't happen to a better group. (Yes, I'm still bitter.)
Couldn't happen to a better group. (Yes, I'm still bitter.)
It's harder to be a STAR when you play on a TEAM!!!!hitmanmw said:
Haley Van Lith...why, why, why????
Deb Antonelli is the only vote for Louisville as #1.DanaDane said:
Does this mean the person who's been voting Louisville #1 will finally switch his/her vote next week? Probably not. It was pretty obvious Louisville shouldn't have been #1, yet was being extended a vote anyway.
yep she said on air she would be changing her vote...to be fair UL was without one of their best players who was playing somewhere overseas with her National team trying to qualify for something...slimecap said:Deb Antonelli is the only vote for Louisville as #1.DanaDane said:
Does this mean the person who's been voting Louisville #1 will finally switch his/her vote next week? Probably not. It was pretty obvious Louisville shouldn't have been #1, yet was being extended a vote anyway.
She can be reached at her twitter account: @debbieantonelli
So Oregon lost to this team??? Dat don't look good.BUbackerinET said:
Cuse 59, L'ville 51 final - nice
not so fast - Louisville does not have one of their best players right now - she is qualifying for her national teamgeewago said:So Oregon lost to this team??? Dat don't look good.BUbackerinET said:
Cuse 59, L'ville 51 final - nice
Ok.......take one of our starters off the team.........Smith for example and replace with Egbo...........Or Juicy and replace with Moon. You don't think BU could beat an 11 - 11 team that is in ninth place in the ACC without that player? I DO.blueeyedbear said:not so fast - Louisville does not have one of their best players right now - she is qualifying for her national teamgeewago said:So Oregon lost to this team??? Dat don't look good.BUbackerinET said:
Cuse 59, L'ville 51 final - nice
This is why I think we are the best team in the Country...UL is not...they are good when they have all their parts but they lack depth and consistency. I think South Carolina is the team most likely to be considered as good if not better as a team than us...Oregon lacks depth and consistency as well.geewago said:Ok.......take one of our starters off the team.........Smith for example and replace with Egbo...........Or Juicy and replace with Moon. You don't think BU could beat an 11 - 11 team that is in ninth place in the ACC without that player? I DO.blueeyedbear said:not so fast - Louisville does not have one of their best players right now - she is qualifying for her national teamgeewago said:So Oregon lost to this team??? Dat don't look good.BUbackerinET said:
Cuse 59, L'ville 51 final - nice
geewago said:
Ok.......take one of our starters off the team.........Smith for example and replace with Egbo...........Or Juicy and replace with Moon. You don't think BU could beat an 11 - 11 team that is in ninth place in the ACC without that player? I DO.
We played them without LC...we played them third game in three days...they lost to Indiana earlier in the same event. They lost at full strength to a team which we beat in same tournament...it is difficult to take too much away from our game other than they were very good and we are better when we have LC...I would say trying to play our brand of basketball defense and pushing the ball running on offense every chance we get is taxing and we were tired...BUbackerinET said:
I generally agree with all of this and totally agree that we could repeat, but we did lose th South Carolina - not saying they are better than us now, but they were, and unless they get beat, or we take them down in the tournament in the rematch (final 4, or final), then we are behind them.
SC's only remaining game against anyone with a pulse is at Kentucky, and they have struggled mightily since Rhyne Howard broke a finger. Maybe MissSt can catch them in the SECSECSEC tourney (which is in SC) but that's probably the only chance before the NCAAs.Eball said:We played them without LC...we played them third game in three days...they lost to Indiana earlier in the same event. They lost at full strength to a team which we beat in same tournament...it is difficult to take too much away from our game other than they were very good and we are better when we have LC...I would say trying to play our brand of basketball defense and pushing the ball running on offense every chance we get is taxing and we were tired...BUbackerinET said:
I generally agree with all of this and totally agree that we could repeat, but we did lose th South Carolina - not saying they are better than us now, but they were, and unless they get beat, or we take them down in the tournament in the rematch (final 4, or final), then we are behind them.
Tea had one of her worst games and it is likely the emotions of playing against her old team were at least partially to blame.
I like our chance at full strength as those three freshmen will play like freshmen if you give them the chance.
I think the SEC is down as a conference this year, so I am going out of a limb here but I think SC loses a game or two before the NCAA's. They are bound to have a lull or a bad game to two...it just happens.
You are probably right but Howard is back I think as of last game when they got blown out by ARK? I think,,,I give LSU A&M(if their star back) and UK a punchers chance and I just think SC is due for a let down bad game it is what Freshmen do...as I say the SEC is down this year. Miss ST in tourney will give them a game.whitetrash said:SC's only remaining game against anyone with a pulse is at Kentucky, and they have struggled mightily since Rhyne Howard broke a finger. Maybe MissSt can catch them in the SECSECSEC tourney (which is in SC) but that's probably the only chance before the NCAAs.Eball said:We played them without LC...we played them third game in three days...they lost to Indiana earlier in the same event. They lost at full strength to a team which we beat in same tournament...it is difficult to take too much away from our game other than they were very good and we are better when we have LC...I would say trying to play our brand of basketball defense and pushing the ball running on offense every chance we get is taxing and we were tired...BUbackerinET said:
I generally agree with all of this and totally agree that we could repeat, but we did lose th South Carolina - not saying they are better than us now, but they were, and unless they get beat, or we take them down in the tournament in the rematch (final 4, or final), then we are behind them.
Tea had one of her worst games and it is likely the emotions of playing against her old team were at least partially to blame.
I like our chance at full strength as those three freshmen will play like freshmen if you give them the chance.
I think the SEC is down as a conference this year, so I am going out of a limb here but I think SC loses a game or two before the NCAA's. They are bound to have a lull or a bad game to two...it just happens.
SCspur said:
It's a great thing to see when Baylor fans are praying on your downfall lol
Certainly not praying for their down fall just pointing out that even though SC is one of the three best teams in the Nation right now they still may drop a a game or two before the NCAA not because they are not good but because they start three freshmen who no matter how good they are will sometimes play like freshmen.SCspur said:
It's a great thing to see when Baylor fans are praying on your downfall lol