SIC EM 94 said:
J.B.Katz said:
cowboycwr said:
1. Armed police officers works for districts that can afford an officer per school. It doesn't work for smaller schools.
And as pointed out it doesn't always help if the officer does nothing like the Florida shooting.
2. Then there is the issue that they can't be everywhere at once and a shooter can still get in to the school.
3. Someone mentioned the locked doors. This is huge. There should be one entrance used to the school. Which is a problem at older schools that have multiple buildings like detached gyms, locker rooms, band halls, etc.
4. All schools need the locked outer door and an interior vestibule door that is locked.
5. Then go a step further and the glass on both doors and windows next to them need to be bullet resistant. I know of plenty of schools that have the two door system but both are just regular safety glass. Hard to break with a rock, chair, etc. but a gun would be able to shoot it out.
6. Panic button at the front desk.
7. Front desk person armed/ safe with locked gun. Or at minimum something like a can of bear spray.
8. Armed staff
9. Lots of drills. Currently in Texas schools have to do two lock down/active shooter drills a year. It should be more. With practice on what to do.
10. All classrooms should have devices used to jam the doors shut. There are a lot of options for any type of door.
All of these don't need to be done but at least two or 3 would help a lot.
Yeah, I really want my grandkids to spent their school hours doing lots of active shooter drills and investing time and energy in all of the rest of this stuff instead of actually learning how to read, right and do arithemetic so Cowboy can open carry.
What the Hell does open carry have to do with school shootings? You are so consumed by your dream of banning guns, that you make the most irrelevant posts over and over. Can you please try and think like an adult?
First of all, God be with these families who lost someone in this horrific tragedy right now. And those children who were at that school and will never be the same. I can't even imagine.
Banning guns always sounds like a simplistic and good answer on paper, but it doesn't change the fact that any of these animals who have attacked schools would have gotten their hands on one anyway. Because you know that "banning" (or even restricting) guns doesn't mean they disappear, or that bad people won't access them anyway.
And evil people find ways of finding evil ways to harm other people.
But strange when you consider that the side of the aisle who most frequently wants a banning/restricting of guns is perfectly fine with open borders (and God only knows what's coming across the border)... it makes it all totally disingenuous. You want our schools protected by banning guns, but you don't want to protect our borders?
I understand the frustration, but looking at this so simplistically doesn't cover all the bases when it comes to evil mindsets.