Herschel Walker, a paragon of Christian virtue

15,172 Views | 203 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Johnny Bear
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.B.Katz said:

GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:

HuMcK said:

They literally have the receipt and a check signed by Walker. Walker threatened to sue, but as Trump does when he knows the facts aren't on his side, he has since backed off that threat.

Here are Walker's most recent public statements on abortion found after 30sec of googling:
"There's not a national ban on abortion right now and I think that's a problem". And then, "there's no [rape or incest or health] exceptions, in my mind", which he confirmed when asked about exceptions by saying "I believe in life".

Even if the abortion thing isn't true (contrary to the evidence provided so far), Walker is a serial adulterer who clearly has very little understanding of any issue that matters (noticing a pattern?), so of course that's the guy y'all throw your support behind.
It should be a big deal and is damning to Walker…but when you so called virtuous democrats let all your politicians and Presidents slide through outrageous scandals with the full support of the media downplaying it, the other side isn't going to really care that much.

You leftists are bringing down society and normalizing idiocracy.

Anyone who supports the traitorous reality TV clown should have enough sense to sit down and shut the fck up about "normalizing idiocracy". You did that, not anyone else, and no one forced you to do it either. Here you are arguing in favor of a deeply unethical man who's only qualification is being a famous football star for Christ's sake, and it's amazing that somehow you still have the gall to accuse others of being the ones to normalize an idiocracy.

Trumpism is fracturing our society, to the point where constant obvious lies and even outright sedition is just hand-waved away, because the quest for power (and the ability to impose your extremist minority views on the majority) Trumps all else.
Dude, your party elected Ted Kennedy SIX times after he killed someone. SIX.

Go sit in the corner and think about that before getting back on your high horse.
Your party elected serial adulterer Newt Gingrich, who divorced one wife while she was in hospital underoing cancer treatment and expected another to tolerate his side gig with Calista, who was Newt's mistress AND a devout Catholic (wanna bet what she didn't talk about in the confession booth)?

There's plenty of moral whataboutism to go around. Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for a sordid affair.

I don't know which is more disgusting: Trump Republcians supported an unqualified dumbass like Herschell Walker for a Senate seat or their ignoring or even defending his history of fathering children out of wedlock and domestic abuse. The party of family values, Republicans ain't.
Here is the real offense. Good grief they would easily win with a competent candidate. In Penn., Dr. Oz is almost as bad, though his never had a real job opponent is even worse.
J.B.Katz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller_bf said:

J.B.Katz said:

GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:

HuMcK said:

They literally have the receipt and a check signed by Walker. Walker threatened to sue, but as Trump does when he knows the facts aren't on his side, he has since backed off that threat.

Here are Walker's most recent public statements on abortion found after 30sec of googling:
"There's not a national ban on abortion right now and I think that's a problem". And then, "there's no [rape or incest or health] exceptions, in my mind", which he confirmed when asked about exceptions by saying "I believe in life".

Even if the abortion thing isn't true (contrary to the evidence provided so far), Walker is a serial adulterer who clearly has very little understanding of any issue that matters (noticing a pattern?), so of course that's the guy y'all throw your support behind.
It should be a big deal and is damning to Walker…but when you so called virtuous democrats let all your politicians and Presidents slide through outrageous scandals with the full support of the media downplaying it, the other side isn't going to really care that much.

You leftists are bringing down society and normalizing idiocracy.

Anyone who supports the traitorous reality TV clown should have enough sense to sit down and shut the fck up about "normalizing idiocracy". You did that, not anyone else, and no one forced you to do it either. Here you are arguing in favor of a deeply unethical man who's only qualification is being a famous football star for Christ's sake, and it's amazing that somehow you still have the gall to accuse others of being the ones to normalize an idiocracy.

Trumpism is fracturing our society, to the point where constant obvious lies and even outright sedition is just hand-waved away, because the quest for power (and the ability to impose your extremist minority views on the majority) Trumps all else.
Dude, your party elected Ted Kennedy SIX times after he killed someone. SIX.

Go sit in the corner and think about that before getting back on your high horse.
Your party elected serial adulterer Newt Gingrich, who divorced one wife while she was in hospital underoing cancer treatment and expected another to tolerate his side gig with Calista, who was Newt's mistress AND a devout Catholic (wanna bet what she didn't talk about in the confession booth)?

There's plenty of moral whataboutism to go around. Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for a sordid affair.

I don't know which is more disgusting: Trump Republcians supported an unqualified dumbass like Herschell Walker for a Senate seat or their ignoring or even defending his history of fathering children out of wedlock and domestic abuse. The party of family values, Republicans ain't.
Here is the real offense. Good grief they would easily win with a competent candidate. In Penn., Dr. Oz is almost as bad, though his never had a real job opponent is even worse.
When the only qualification for a GOP candidate is uncritical, loud support for Donald Trump, you get guys like Herschel Walker. Who should never have been on a ballot for any party.

Before 2016 I often voted for Republican candidates, especially for Senate and governor in my state, b/c their opponents weren't worthy of the seat and while I didn't agree with these candidates on every issue, they were capable, experienced professionals whose views on social issues tended toward moderation. That ended with Trump. A party led by Trump controlling anything, much less the future of the U.S. and the nominees of one major, formerly respectable party=a preventable disaster




GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.B.Katz said:

GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:

HuMcK said:

They literally have the receipt and a check signed by Walker. Walker threatened to sue, but as Trump does when he knows the facts aren't on his side, he has since backed off that threat.

Here are Walker's most recent public statements on abortion found after 30sec of googling:
"There's not a national ban on abortion right now and I think that's a problem". And then, "there's no [rape or incest or health] exceptions, in my mind", which he confirmed when asked about exceptions by saying "I believe in life".

Even if the abortion thing isn't true (contrary to the evidence provided so far), Walker is a serial adulterer who clearly has very little understanding of any issue that matters (noticing a pattern?), so of course that's the guy y'all throw your support behind.
It should be a big deal and is damning to Walker…but when you so called virtuous democrats let all your politicians and Presidents slide through outrageous scandals with the full support of the media downplaying it, the other side isn't going to really care that much.

You leftists are bringing down society and normalizing idiocracy.

Anyone who supports the traitorous reality TV clown should have enough sense to sit down and shut the fck up about "normalizing idiocracy". You did that, not anyone else, and no one forced you to do it either. Here you are arguing in favor of a deeply unethical man who's only qualification is being a famous football star for Christ's sake, and it's amazing that somehow you still have the gall to accuse others of being the ones to normalize an idiocracy.

Trumpism is fracturing our society, to the point where constant obvious lies and even outright sedition is just hand-waved away, because the quest for power (and the ability to impose your extremist minority views on the majority) Trumps all else.
Dude, your party elected Ted Kennedy SIX times after he killed someone. SIX.

Go sit in the corner and think about that before getting back on your high horse.
Your party elected serial adulterer Newt Gingrich, who divorced one wife while she was in hospital underoing cancer treatment and expected another to tolerate his side gig with Calista, who was Newt's mistress AND a devout Catholic (wanna bet what she didn't talk about in the confession booth)?

There's plenty of moral whataboutism to go around. Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for a sordid affair.

I don't know which is more disgusting: Trump Republcians supported an unqualified dumbass like Herschell Walker for a Senate seat or their ignoring or even defending his history of fathering children out of wedlock and domestic abuse. The party of family values, Republicans ain't.
Great. Learned it from you. Get off your high horse.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Canada2017 said:

J.R. said:

he seems to be a real POS. Just look at his son's tweet. I don't do Twaddle, be I saw a copy of it.
LOL

Seriously big guy ?

That's all it takes in your book to be a 'real POS' ?




By your rules there are tens of millions of 'real POS ' men out there.

Just ask their ex wives or ex girl friends .

Are they all now unqualified for public office ...or just the Republican ones ?
Well, good sir. When you have 4 different fun babies from 4 different women and you have not raised or paid for them.

Additionally when you put a gun to your wife's head and threaten to "blow her head off", I'm fairly sure all the qualifies is POS!


Confused .

How is it then that George Floyd achieved woke sainthood ?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.B.Katz said:

Forest Bueller_bf said:

J.B.Katz said:

GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:

HuMcK said:

They literally have the receipt and a check signed by Walker. Walker threatened to sue, but as Trump does when he knows the facts aren't on his side, he has since backed off that threat.

Here are Walker's most recent public statements on abortion found after 30sec of googling:
"There's not a national ban on abortion right now and I think that's a problem". And then, "there's no [rape or incest or health] exceptions, in my mind", which he confirmed when asked about exceptions by saying "I believe in life".

Even if the abortion thing isn't true (contrary to the evidence provided so far), Walker is a serial adulterer who clearly has very little understanding of any issue that matters (noticing a pattern?), so of course that's the guy y'all throw your support behind.
It should be a big deal and is damning to Walker…but when you so called virtuous democrats let all your politicians and Presidents slide through outrageous scandals with the full support of the media downplaying it, the other side isn't going to really care that much.

You leftists are bringing down society and normalizing idiocracy.

Anyone who supports the traitorous reality TV clown should have enough sense to sit down and shut the fck up about "normalizing idiocracy". You did that, not anyone else, and no one forced you to do it either. Here you are arguing in favor of a deeply unethical man who's only qualification is being a famous football star for Christ's sake, and it's amazing that somehow you still have the gall to accuse others of being the ones to normalize an idiocracy.

Trumpism is fracturing our society, to the point where constant obvious lies and even outright sedition is just hand-waved away, because the quest for power (and the ability to impose your extremist minority views on the majority) Trumps all else.
Dude, your party elected Ted Kennedy SIX times after he killed someone. SIX.

Go sit in the corner and think about that before getting back on your high horse.
Your party elected serial adulterer Newt Gingrich, who divorced one wife while she was in hospital underoing cancer treatment and expected another to tolerate his side gig with Calista, who was Newt's mistress AND a devout Catholic (wanna bet what she didn't talk about in the confession booth)?

There's plenty of moral whataboutism to go around. Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for a sordid affair.

I don't know which is more disgusting: Trump Republcians supported an unqualified dumbass like Herschell Walker for a Senate seat or their ignoring or even defending his history of fathering children out of wedlock and domestic abuse. The party of family values, Republicans ain't.
Here is the real offense. Good grief they would easily win with a competent candidate. In Penn., Dr. Oz is almost as bad, though his never had a real job opponent is even worse.
When the only qualification for a GOP candidate is uncritical, loud support for Donald Trump, you get guys like Herschel Walker. Who should never have been on a ballot for any party.

Before 2016 I often voted for Republican candidates, especially for Senate and governor in my state, b/c their opponents weren't worthy of the seat and while I didn't agree with these candidates on every issue, they were capable, experienced professionals whose views on social issues tended toward moderation. That ended with Trump. A party led by Trump controlling anything, much less the future of the U.S. and the nominees of one major, formerly respectable party=a preventable disaster
Your so called moderates pushed forever wars, played nice with the hard left and fleeced the middle class.

There's nothing to respect.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller_bf said:

J.B.Katz said:

GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:

HuMcK said:

They literally have the receipt and a check signed by Walker. Walker threatened to sue, but as Trump does when he knows the facts aren't on his side, he has since backed off that threat.

Here are Walker's most recent public statements on abortion found after 30sec of googling:
"There's not a national ban on abortion right now and I think that's a problem". And then, "there's no [rape or incest or health] exceptions, in my mind", which he confirmed when asked about exceptions by saying "I believe in life".

Even if the abortion thing isn't true (contrary to the evidence provided so far), Walker is a serial adulterer who clearly has very little understanding of any issue that matters (noticing a pattern?), so of course that's the guy y'all throw your support behind.
It should be a big deal and is damning to Walker…but when you so called virtuous democrats let all your politicians and Presidents slide through outrageous scandals with the full support of the media downplaying it, the other side isn't going to really care that much.

You leftists are bringing down society and normalizing idiocracy.

Anyone who supports the traitorous reality TV clown should have enough sense to sit down and shut the fck up about "normalizing idiocracy". You did that, not anyone else, and no one forced you to do it either. Here you are arguing in favor of a deeply unethical man who's only qualification is being a famous football star for Christ's sake, and it's amazing that somehow you still have the gall to accuse others of being the ones to normalize an idiocracy.

Trumpism is fracturing our society, to the point where constant obvious lies and even outright sedition is just hand-waved away, because the quest for power (and the ability to impose your extremist minority views on the majority) Trumps all else.
Dude, your party elected Ted Kennedy SIX times after he killed someone. SIX.

Go sit in the corner and think about that before getting back on your high horse.
Your party elected serial adulterer Newt Gingrich, who divorced one wife while she was in hospital underoing cancer treatment and expected another to tolerate his side gig with Calista, who was Newt's mistress AND a devout Catholic (wanna bet what she didn't talk about in the confession booth)?

There's plenty of moral whataboutism to go around. Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for a sordid affair.

I don't know which is more disgusting: Trump Republcians supported an unqualified dumbass like Herschell Walker for a Senate seat or their ignoring or even defending his history of fathering children out of wedlock and domestic abuse. The party of family values, Republicans ain't.
Here is the real offense. Good grief they would easily win with a competent candidate. In Penn., Dr. Oz is almost as bad, though his never had a real job opponent is even worse.
This 100%.

I live in Texas, so I do not really follow other state's senate races ... but I don't get all the Dr. Oz hate other than being a closet Democrat ... especially when contrasted with his incel opponent.

However, I think we do generally on both parties have a problem finding and electing quality candidates.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.B.Katz said:

GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:

HuMcK said:

They literally have the receipt and a check signed by Walker. Walker threatened to sue, but as Trump does when he knows the facts aren't on his side, he has since backed off that threat.

Here are Walker's most recent public statements on abortion found after 30sec of googling:
"There's not a national ban on abortion right now and I think that's a problem". And then, "there's no [rape or incest or health] exceptions, in my mind", which he confirmed when asked about exceptions by saying "I believe in life".

Even if the abortion thing isn't true (contrary to the evidence provided so far), Walker is a serial adulterer who clearly has very little understanding of any issue that matters (noticing a pattern?), so of course that's the guy y'all throw your support behind.
It should be a big deal and is damning to Walker…but when you so called virtuous democrats let all your politicians and Presidents slide through outrageous scandals with the full support of the media downplaying it, the other side isn't going to really care that much.

You leftists are bringing down society and normalizing idiocracy.

Anyone who supports the traitorous reality TV clown should have enough sense to sit down and shut the fck up about "normalizing idiocracy". You did that, not anyone else, and no one forced you to do it either. Here you are arguing in favor of a deeply unethical man who's only qualification is being a famous football star for Christ's sake, and it's amazing that somehow you still have the gall to accuse others of being the ones to normalize an idiocracy.

Trumpism is fracturing our society, to the point where constant obvious lies and even outright sedition is just hand-waved away, because the quest for power (and the ability to impose your extremist minority views on the majority) Trumps all else.
Dude, your party elected Ted Kennedy SIX times after he killed someone. SIX.

Go sit in the corner and think about that before getting back on your high horse.
Your party elected serial adulterer Newt Gingrich, who divorced one wife while she was in hospital underoing cancer treatment and expected another to tolerate his side gig with Calista, who was Newt's mistress AND a devout Catholic (wanna bet what she didn't talk about in the confession booth)?

There's plenty of moral whataboutism to go around. Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for a sordid affair.

I don't know which is more disgusting: Trump Republcians supported an unqualified dumbass like Herschell Walker for a Senate seat or their ignoring or even defending his history of fathering children out of wedlock and domestic abuse. The party of family values, Republicans ain't.
Sigh.

clinton was not impeached for the affair. It was for the lying under oath about it.

And funny you would bring that up in the same post you call a Republican an adulterer....


Oh and what are your thoughts about this?

So you mean basically the opposite of the people who support abortions and bring up the small percentage (extremely small percentage) of abortions that happen due to rape or incest while ignoring most states leave exemptions in their laws for those cases??????
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.B.Katz said:

Forest Bueller_bf said:

J.B.Katz said:

GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:

HuMcK said:

They literally have the receipt and a check signed by Walker. Walker threatened to sue, but as Trump does when he knows the facts aren't on his side, he has since backed off that threat.

Here are Walker's most recent public statements on abortion found after 30sec of googling:
"There's not a national ban on abortion right now and I think that's a problem". And then, "there's no [rape or incest or health] exceptions, in my mind", which he confirmed when asked about exceptions by saying "I believe in life".

Even if the abortion thing isn't true (contrary to the evidence provided so far), Walker is a serial adulterer who clearly has very little understanding of any issue that matters (noticing a pattern?), so of course that's the guy y'all throw your support behind.
It should be a big deal and is damning to Walker…but when you so called virtuous democrats let all your politicians and Presidents slide through outrageous scandals with the full support of the media downplaying it, the other side isn't going to really care that much.

You leftists are bringing down society and normalizing idiocracy.

Anyone who supports the traitorous reality TV clown should have enough sense to sit down and shut the fck up about "normalizing idiocracy". You did that, not anyone else, and no one forced you to do it either. Here you are arguing in favor of a deeply unethical man who's only qualification is being a famous football star for Christ's sake, and it's amazing that somehow you still have the gall to accuse others of being the ones to normalize an idiocracy.

Trumpism is fracturing our society, to the point where constant obvious lies and even outright sedition is just hand-waved away, because the quest for power (and the ability to impose your extremist minority views on the majority) Trumps all else.
Dude, your party elected Ted Kennedy SIX times after he killed someone. SIX.

Go sit in the corner and think about that before getting back on your high horse.
Your party elected serial adulterer Newt Gingrich, who divorced one wife while she was in hospital underoing cancer treatment and expected another to tolerate his side gig with Calista, who was Newt's mistress AND a devout Catholic (wanna bet what she didn't talk about in the confession booth)?

There's plenty of moral whataboutism to go around. Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for a sordid affair.

I don't know which is more disgusting: Trump Republcians supported an unqualified dumbass like Herschell Walker for a Senate seat or their ignoring or even defending his history of fathering children out of wedlock and domestic abuse. The party of family values, Republicans ain't.
Here is the real offense. Good grief they would easily win with a competent candidate. In Penn., Dr. Oz is almost as bad, though his never had a real job opponent is even worse.
When the only qualification for a GOP candidate is uncritical, loud support for Donald Trump, you get guys like Herschel Walker. Who should never have been on a ballot for any party.

Before 2016 I often voted for Republican candidates, especially for Senate and governor in my state, b/c their opponents weren't worthy of the seat and while I didn't agree with these candidates on every issue, they were capable, experienced professionals whose views on social issues tended toward moderation. That ended with Trump. A party led by Trump controlling anything, much less the future of the U.S. and the nominees of one major, formerly respectable party=a preventable disaster







More confused.

Big Guy you constantly smack Trump hard ….and I mostly agree with your assessment.

But clearly nothing changed ' with Trump ' …..in 2016 OR 2020 for that matter .



As you have repeatedly stated you voted for Trump on both occasions. Voted for your 'wallet ' if I remember correctly .





J.B.Katz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

J.B.Katz said:

GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:

HuMcK said:

They literally have the receipt and a check signed by Walker. Walker threatened to sue, but as Trump does when he knows the facts aren't on his side, he has since backed off that threat.

Here are Walker's most recent public statements on abortion found after 30sec of googling:
"There's not a national ban on abortion right now and I think that's a problem". And then, "there's no [rape or incest or health] exceptions, in my mind", which he confirmed when asked about exceptions by saying "I believe in life".

Even if the abortion thing isn't true (contrary to the evidence provided so far), Walker is a serial adulterer who clearly has very little understanding of any issue that matters (noticing a pattern?), so of course that's the guy y'all throw your support behind.
It should be a big deal and is damning to Walker…but when you so called virtuous democrats let all your politicians and Presidents slide through outrageous scandals with the full support of the media downplaying it, the other side isn't going to really care that much.

You leftists are bringing down society and normalizing idiocracy.

Anyone who supports the traitorous reality TV clown should have enough sense to sit down and shut the fck up about "normalizing idiocracy". You did that, not anyone else, and no one forced you to do it either. Here you are arguing in favor of a deeply unethical man who's only qualification is being a famous football star for Christ's sake, and it's amazing that somehow you still have the gall to accuse others of being the ones to normalize an idiocracy.

Trumpism is fracturing our society, to the point where constant obvious lies and even outright sedition is just hand-waved away, because the quest for power (and the ability to impose your extremist minority views on the majority) Trumps all else.
Dude, your party elected Ted Kennedy SIX times after he killed someone. SIX.

Go sit in the corner and think about that before getting back on your high horse.
Your party elected serial adulterer Newt Gingrich, who divorced one wife while she was in hospital underoing cancer treatment and expected another to tolerate his side gig with Calista, who was Newt's mistress AND a devout Catholic (wanna bet what she didn't talk about in the confession booth)?

There's plenty of moral whataboutism to go around. Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for a sordid affair.

I don't know which is more disgusting: Trump Republcians supported an unqualified dumbass like Herschell Walker for a Senate seat or their ignoring or even defending his history of fathering children out of wedlock and domestic abuse. The party of family values, Republicans ain't.
Sigh.

clinton was not impeached for the affair. It was for the lying under oath about it.

And funny you would bring that up in the same post you call a Republican an adulterer....


Oh and what are your thoughts about this?

So you mean basically the opposite of the people who support abortions and bring up the small percentage (extremely small percentage) of abortions that happen due to rape or incest while ignoring most states leave exemptions in their laws for those cases??????
The whole purpose of the impeachment proceedings was to embarrass Clinton.

The the politicians who acted so self-righteous and furious about Clinton's lie about a sordid encounter, flatly refused to acknowledge Trump's lies. Barr actively buried the Mueller report. Then Republicans wouldn't impeach Trump when he clearly incited an insurrection than endangered them and their colleagues.

I was disgusted by Clinton's affair and disgusted by Ken Starr's salacious prosecution of it. Brett Kavanaugh wrote a list of those questions. Clinton should have kept his pants zipped. I didn't think he was a great president. Ending Glass Steagall was just one of the bad things he did.

There is no comparison between what Clinton did and the unbridled corruption,disrespect for his office, stealing of state secrets, use of federal staff for personal purposes, nepotism, infantile temper tantrums, tweet rants, firing by tweet and the other unpresidential behaviors of Trump that endangered national security and turned us from a respected first-world leader into a laughing stock as Trump praised the likes of Kim Jung Un and Putin. There is no adequate excuse for supporting Trump. None.

On the rape-related pregnancy front, here's CDC report that indicates rape-related pregnancy is often a product of domestic violence:

Rape and Rape-Related Pregnancy: By the Numbers

  • Almost 3 million women in the U.S. experienced RRP during their lifetime.
  • The prevalence of RRP was similar across racial and ethnic groups (i.e., Hispanic, White non-Hispanic, Black non-Hispanic, and other non-Hispanic).
  • About 18 million women have experienced vaginal rape in their lifetime. Women who were raped by a current or former intimate partner were more likely to report RRP (26%) compared to those raped by an acquaintance (5.2%) or a stranger (6.9%).
  • Of women who were raped by an intimate partner, 30% experienced a form of reproductive coercion by the same partner. Specifically, about 20% reported that their partner had tried to get them pregnant when they did not want to or tried to stop them from using birth control. About 23% reported their partner refused to use a condom.
  • Women raped by an intimate partner who reported RRP were significantly more likely to have experienced reproductive coercion compared to women who were raped by an intimate partner but did not become pregnant.

These data come from the first study in over 20 years to offer a nationally representative prevalence estimate of RRP of U.S. women by any perpetrator and the first ever to provide these estimates by race and ethnicity. The findings add to the understanding of the relationship between SV and intimate partner violence (IPV) and reproductive health among U.S. women..
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.


Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Add the end of the day this is really no different than Democrats taking a tax deductions.
SIC EM 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

he seems to be a real POS. Just look at his son's tweet. I don't do Twaddle, be I saw a copy of it.

His son is so gay that anything he says about his conservative father should be taken with a grain of salt.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cms186 said:

Do as i say, not as i do.

I wonder how many of these Republican lawmakers voting to end women's access to Abortion rights have paid their Mistresses to have an Abortion, I imagine its a lot


Let's use more honest and complete language instead of abstract language that tends to obscure what we are actually talking about. When someone says "access to Abortion rights" (when did abortion become a proper noun, by the way?) what they mean is "the right to have unborn human offspring killed just for the crime of existing."
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.


Yeah every business executive in or out of government has the inherent right to have sex with an intern ….then lie about it.



Who could possibly doubt it ?

Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.


That whole sordid episode ruined that young woman's life. Just because a powerful man abused his power. That bother you?
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.


That whole sordid episode ruined that young woman's life. Just because a powerful man abused his power. That bother you?


You obviously don't follow Monica Lewinsky. She seems successful and happy. And far better off than the wreckage Walker has left all around him.

But that isn't the point. Clinton was wrong and deserved to be castigated. So does Walker.

See the difference? Some of us can demand something approaching character from both sides of the aisle. Some of you can't.
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Booray said:

Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.


Yeah every business executive in or out of government has the inherent right to have sex with an intern ….then lie about it.



Who could possibly doubt it ?




Just asking for equal treatment. Neither of them deserve high office. If lack of character disqualified Clinton, the same should apply to Walker.

And at least Clinton was brilliant. Walker is a moron on top of being a d-bag.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

Canada2017 said:

Booray said:

Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.


Yeah every business executive in or out of government has the inherent right to have sex with an intern ….then lie about it.



Who could possibly doubt it ?






And at least Clinton was brilliant.
Interesting description .

Obviously Jeffrey Epstein shared your opinion.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.


That whole sordid episode ruined that young woman's life. Just because a powerful man abused his power. That bother you?


You obviously don't follow Monica Lewinsky. She seems successful and happy. And far better off than the wreckage Walker has left all around him.

But that isn't the point. Clinton was wrong and deserved to be castigated. So does Walker.

See the difference? Some of us can demand something approaching character from both sides of the aisle. Some of you can't.


The gal is 50 and never been married. Tell me that is because she wants to be single.

You don't demand character or you wouldn't have voted Bidd3n.
LateSteak69
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wait, people are still on board with Walker?!
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.B.Katz said:

cowboycwr said:

J.B.Katz said:

GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Doc Holliday said:

HuMcK said:

They literally have the receipt and a check signed by Walker. Walker threatened to sue, but as Trump does when he knows the facts aren't on his side, he has since backed off that threat.

Here are Walker's most recent public statements on abortion found after 30sec of googling:
"There's not a national ban on abortion right now and I think that's a problem". And then, "there's no [rape or incest or health] exceptions, in my mind", which he confirmed when asked about exceptions by saying "I believe in life".

Even if the abortion thing isn't true (contrary to the evidence provided so far), Walker is a serial adulterer who clearly has very little understanding of any issue that matters (noticing a pattern?), so of course that's the guy y'all throw your support behind.
It should be a big deal and is damning to Walker…but when you so called virtuous democrats let all your politicians and Presidents slide through outrageous scandals with the full support of the media downplaying it, the other side isn't going to really care that much.

You leftists are bringing down society and normalizing idiocracy.

Anyone who supports the traitorous reality TV clown should have enough sense to sit down and shut the fck up about "normalizing idiocracy". You did that, not anyone else, and no one forced you to do it either. Here you are arguing in favor of a deeply unethical man who's only qualification is being a famous football star for Christ's sake, and it's amazing that somehow you still have the gall to accuse others of being the ones to normalize an idiocracy.

Trumpism is fracturing our society, to the point where constant obvious lies and even outright sedition is just hand-waved away, because the quest for power (and the ability to impose your extremist minority views on the majority) Trumps all else.
Dude, your party elected Ted Kennedy SIX times after he killed someone. SIX.

Go sit in the corner and think about that before getting back on your high horse.
Your party elected serial adulterer Newt Gingrich, who divorced one wife while she was in hospital underoing cancer treatment and expected another to tolerate his side gig with Calista, who was Newt's mistress AND a devout Catholic (wanna bet what she didn't talk about in the confession booth)?

There's plenty of moral whataboutism to go around. Republicans impeached Bill Clinton for a sordid affair.

I don't know which is more disgusting: Trump Republcians supported an unqualified dumbass like Herschell Walker for a Senate seat or their ignoring or even defending his history of fathering children out of wedlock and domestic abuse. The party of family values, Republicans ain't.
Sigh.

clinton was not impeached for the affair. It was for the lying under oath about it.

And funny you would bring that up in the same post you call a Republican an adulterer....


Oh and what are your thoughts about this?

So you mean basically the opposite of the people who support abortions and bring up the small percentage (extremely small percentage) of abortions that happen due to rape or incest while ignoring most states leave exemptions in their laws for those cases??????
The whole purpose of the impeachment proceedings was to embarrass Clinton.

The the politicians who acted so self-righteous and furious about Clinton's lie about a sordid encounter, flatly refused to acknowledge Trump's lies. Barr actively buried the Mueller report. Then Republicans wouldn't impeach Trump when he clearly incited an insurrection than endangered them and their colleagues.

I was disgusted by Clinton's affair and disgusted by Ken Starr's salacious prosecution of it. Brett Kavanaugh wrote a list of those questions. Clinton should have kept his pants zipped. I didn't think he was a great president. Ending Glass Steagall was just one of the bad things he did.

There is no comparison between what Clinton did and the unbridled corruption,disrespect for his office, stealing of state secrets, use of federal staff for personal purposes, nepotism, infantile temper tantrums, tweet rants, firing by tweet and the other unpresidential behaviors of Trump that endangered national security and turned us from a respected first-world leader into a laughing stock as Trump praised the likes of Kim Jung Un and Putin. There is no adequate excuse for supporting Trump. None.

On the rape-related pregnancy front, here's CDC report that indicates rape-related pregnancy is often a product of domestic violence:

Rape and Rape-Related Pregnancy: By the Numbers

  • Almost 3 million women in the U.S. experienced RRP during their lifetime.
  • The prevalence of RRP was similar across racial and ethnic groups (i.e., Hispanic, White non-Hispanic, Black non-Hispanic, and other non-Hispanic).
  • About 18 million women have experienced vaginal rape in their lifetime. Women who were raped by a current or former intimate partner were more likely to report RRP (26%) compared to those raped by an acquaintance (5.2%) or a stranger (6.9%).
  • Of women who were raped by an intimate partner, 30% experienced a form of reproductive coercion by the same partner. Specifically, about 20% reported that their partner had tried to get them pregnant when they did not want to or tried to stop them from using birth control. About 23% reported their partner refused to use a condom.
  • Women raped by an intimate partner who reported RRP were significantly more likely to have experienced reproductive coercion compared to women who were raped by an intimate partner but did not become pregnant.

These data come from the first study in over 20 years to offer a nationally representative prevalence estimate of RRP of U.S. women by any perpetrator and the first ever to provide these estimates by race and ethnicity. The findings add to the understanding of the relationship between SV and intimate partner violence (IPV) and reproductive health among U.S. women..

Even your own data shows nothing about the small number of abortions that take place due to rape. Which is a very small number.

So including the number of women raped proves nothing about the extremely small number of abortions that take place due to a rape that your side uses as an argument to allow ALL abortions.

Your first sentence is the same for the first impeachment of Trump. It was just to embarrass him and had no facts behind it.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LateSteak69 said:

wait, people are still on board with Walker?!
The alternative is the Georgia version of Jeremiah Wright.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LateSteak69 said:

wait, people are still on board with Walker?!
I thought it was a nice touch for him to send an uplifting card with the check for the abortion. Who says chivalry is dead? Bonus points. I hope Walker WAFFLESTOMPS Warnock.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
LateSteak69
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

LateSteak69 said:

wait, people are still on board with Walker?!
I thought it was a nice touch for him to send an uplifting card with the check for the abortion. Who says chivalry is dead? Bonus points. I hope Walker WAFFLESTOMPS Warnock.
Ha! the guy is a nutjob with CTE. He and fellow GA nutjob MTG need to go back to waiting tables where they belong.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He Hate Me said:

LateSteak69 said:

wait, people are still on board with Walker?!
The alternative is the Georgia version of Jeremiah Wright.
Yep, Walker is better for the issues we face now. I don't expect him to conjugate verbs, just vote with Mitch
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LateSteak69 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

LateSteak69 said:

wait, people are still on board with Walker?!
I thought it was a nice touch for him to send an uplifting card with the check for the abortion. Who says chivalry is dead? Bonus points. I hope Walker WAFFLESTOMPS Warnock.
Ha! the guy is a nutjob with CTE. He and fellow GA nutjob MTG need to go back to waiting tables where they belong.
Biden, Pelosi, and Fetterman have made brain impairment cool! Amiright? It has almost become a prerequisite in the Democratic Party for running for high office. I think the day that God handed out brains , Kamala overslept.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
both candidates are pretty damn pathetic.

sad commentary on society.

- tbp*

arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat.
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.


That whole sordid episode ruined that young woman's life. Just because a powerful man abused his power. That bother you?


You obviously don't follow Monica Lewinsky. She seems successful and happy. And far better off than the wreckage Walker has left all around him.

But that isn't the point. Clinton was wrong and deserved to be castigated. So does Walker.

See the difference? Some of us can demand something approaching character from both sides of the aisle. Some of you can't.


The gal is 50 and never been married. Tell me that is because she wants to be single.

You don't demand character or you wouldn't have voted Bidd3n.
The gal is 50 and never been married. Tell me that is because she wants to be single

What does that even mean? She is not happy becuase she is single? Clinton prevented her from getting married? Women are lesser if not barefott and pregnant? Help me out here-is she not successful and happpy?

You don't demand character or you wouldn't have voted Bidd3n.

I can demand character all I want and I can vote that way in the primaries usually. But in the general election my choices are limited. Joe Biden was never very smart, lacks the energy to do the job he was elected for, has a blind spot for his ne'er do well son that causes me concern. And I voted for him becuase his character is 100 times better than the guy he was running against.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.


That whole sordid episode ruined that young woman's life. Just because a powerful man abused his power. That bother you?


You obviously don't follow Monica Lewinsky. She seems successful and happy. And far better off than the wreckage Walker has left all around him.

But that isn't the point. Clinton was wrong and deserved to be castigated. So does Walker.

See the difference? Some of us can demand something approaching character from both sides of the aisle. Some of you can't.


The gal is 50 and never been married. Tell me that is because she wants to be single.

You don't demand character or you wouldn't have voted Bidd3n.
The gal is 50 and never been married. Tell me that is because she wants to be single

What does that even mean? She is not happy becuase she is single? Clinton prevented her from getting married? Women are lesser if not barefott and pregnant? Help me out here-is she not successful and happpy?

You don't demand character or you wouldn't have voted Bidd3n.

I can demand character all I want and I can vote that way in the primaries usually. But in the general election my choices are limited. Joe Biden was never very smart, lacks the energy to do the job he was elected for, has a blind spot for his ne'er do well son that causes me concern. And I voted for him becuase his character is 100 times better than the guy he was running against.
He showered with his daughter. Your character assessment skills are *****
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Booray said:

He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.


That whole sordid episode ruined that young woman's life. Just because a powerful man abused his power. That bother you?


You obviously don't follow Monica Lewinsky. She seems successful and happy. And far better off than the wreckage Walker has left all around him.

But that isn't the point. Clinton was wrong and deserved to be castigated. So does Walker.

See the difference? Some of us can demand something approaching character from both sides of the aisle. Some of you can't.


The gal is 50 and never been married. Tell me that is because she wants to be single.

You don't demand character or you wouldn't have voted Bidd3n.
The gal is 50 and never been married. Tell me that is because she wants to be single

What does that even mean? She is not happy becuase she is single? Clinton prevented her from getting married? Women are lesser if not barefott and pregnant? Help me out here-is she not successful and happpy?

You don't demand character or you wouldn't have voted Bidd3n.

I can demand character all I want and I can vote that way in the primaries usually. But in the general election my choices are limited. Joe Biden was never very smart, lacks the energy to do the job he was elected for, has a blind spot for his ne'er do well son that causes me concern. And I voted for him becuase his character is 100 times better than the guy he was running against.
He showered with his daughter. Your character assessment skills are *****
I'll wait for the details on that. One, I showered with my daughter at the beach. I had my bathing suit on and it was an outdoor shower, but someone could say i showered with my daughter and it would be factually accurate and yet, no harm done.. Two, how old was she? Three, how reliable is she?

Also, the point of this thread and the conservative responses is that they would be okay with a candidate who abuses his daughter as long as he votes the way Mitch tells him to vote. So I don't see why you are worried abut what Jue does.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

Wangchung said:

Booray said:

He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.


That whole sordid episode ruined that young woman's life. Just because a powerful man abused his power. That bother you?


You obviously don't follow Monica Lewinsky. She seems successful and happy. And far better off than the wreckage Walker has left all around him.

But that isn't the point. Clinton was wrong and deserved to be castigated. So does Walker.

See the difference? Some of us can demand something approaching character from both sides of the aisle. Some of you can't.


The gal is 50 and never been married. Tell me that is because she wants to be single.

You don't demand character or you wouldn't have voted Bidd3n.
The gal is 50 and never been married. Tell me that is because she wants to be single

What does that even mean? She is not happy becuase she is single? Clinton prevented her from getting married? Women are lesser if not barefott and pregnant? Help me out here-is she not successful and happpy?

You don't demand character or you wouldn't have voted Bidd3n.

I can demand character all I want and I can vote that way in the primaries usually. But in the general election my choices are limited. Joe Biden was never very smart, lacks the energy to do the job he was elected for, has a blind spot for his ne'er do well son that causes me concern. And I voted for him becuase his character is 100 times better than the guy he was running against.
He showered with his daughter. Your character assessment skills are *****
I'll wait for the details on that. One, I showered with my daughter at the beach. I had my bathing suit on and it was an outdoor shower, but someone could say i showered with my daughter and it would be factually accurate and yet, no harm done.. Two, how old was she? Three, how reliable is she?

Also, the point of this thread and the conservative responses is that they would be okay with a candidate who abuses his daughter as long as he votes the way Mitch tells him to vote. So I don't see why you are worried abut what Jue does.
Some decisions are not easy and require nuance. Walker is flawed, he wasn't my first choice. I think he will do less harm than the opponent.
I'm not asking him to preach on morals, just vote like Mitch tells him
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

Wangchung said:

Booray said:

He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

He Hate Me said:

Booray said:

Jacques Strap said:

J.B.Katz said:

And I didn't even have to come SicEm to hear the excuses Republicans are making for Walker, one of the few candidates ever less qualified to run for the office he seeks than Trump was.

IDGAF what he has done and make zero excuses for him. As long as he cast more votes they way I want him to (he will) than the other candidate he is my guy.





You and 99% of the GOP. Same group that impeached Clinton and were appalled by Lewinski's blue dress. Astounding hypocrisy.


That whole sordid episode ruined that young woman's life. Just because a powerful man abused his power. That bother you?


You obviously don't follow Monica Lewinsky. She seems successful and happy. And far better off than the wreckage Walker has left all around him.

But that isn't the point. Clinton was wrong and deserved to be castigated. So does Walker.

See the difference? Some of us can demand something approaching character from both sides of the aisle. Some of you can't.


The gal is 50 and never been married. Tell me that is because she wants to be single.

You don't demand character or you wouldn't have voted Bidd3n.
The gal is 50 and never been married. Tell me that is because she wants to be single

What does that even mean? She is not happy becuase she is single? Clinton prevented her from getting married? Women are lesser if not barefott and pregnant? Help me out here-is she not successful and happpy?

You don't demand character or you wouldn't have voted Bidd3n.

I can demand character all I want and I can vote that way in the primaries usually. But in the general election my choices are limited. Joe Biden was never very smart, lacks the energy to do the job he was elected for, has a blind spot for his ne'er do well son that causes me concern. And I voted for him becuase his character is 100 times better than the guy he was running against.
He showered with his daughter. Your character assessment skills are *****
I'll wait for the details on that. One, I showered with my daughter at the beach. I had my bathing suit on and it was an outdoor shower, but someone could say i showered with my daughter and it would be factually accurate and yet, no harm done.. Two, how old was she? Three, how reliable is she?

Also, the point of this thread and the conservative responses is that they would be okay with a candidate who abuses his daughter as long as he votes the way Mitch tells him to vote. So I don't see why you are worried abut what Jue does.
I responded to a post where you specifically mentioned voting for Biden over Trump based on your assessment of their respective character. Biden's daughter said she showered with her father until what she felt was an inappropriate age in the same paragraphs where she spoke of being a hyper sexualized child. She wrote those words for her eyes only in her personal diary, so your doubt in their veracity comes from your own desire for her to be lying. This was no day at the beach.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

He Hate Me said:

LateSteak69 said:

wait, people are still on board with Walker?!
The alternative is the Georgia version of Jeremiah Wright.
Yep, Walker is better for the issues we face now. I don't expect him to conjugate verbs, just vote with Mitch
you talking about Mitch's "*****" (paraphasing) wife that Trump referred to her? Just making sure.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.