Fre3dombear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Stopped reading at 'false claims about the 2020 election.'

The fraud was rampant. Will only vote for candidates that hear our concerns on securing elections. It is the ONLY issue until it is solved.

---

There was no fraud that changed the outcome. Real Americans voted. You are destroying America with your lies.

---

That's what they call useless eater

---

Yeah forgive me for caring about this big great country.

Porteroso said:

---

Fre3dombear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Stopped reading at 'false claims about the 2020 election.'

The fraud was rampant. Will only vote for candidates that hear our concerns on securing elections. It is the ONLY issue until it is solved.

---

There was no fraud that changed the outcome. Real Americans voted. You are destroying America with your lies.

---

That's what they call useless eater

---

Yeah forgive me for caring about this big great country.

---

By "country", Porteroso, we all know you really mean 'political oligarchy'.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Fre3dombear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Stopped reading at 'false claims about the 2020 election.'

The fraud was rampant. Will only vote for candidates that hear our concerns on securing elections. It is the ONLY issue until it is solved.

---

There was no fraud that changed the outcome. Real Americans voted. You are destroying America with your lies.

---

That's what they call useless eater

---

Yeah forgive me for caring about this big great country.

---

By "country", Porteroso, we all know you really mean 'political oligarchy'.

---

What tripe lol. How do you get to oligarchy? I complain about it all the time. The complete ineptitude is hard to deal with.

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Stopped reading at 'false claims about the 2020 election.'

The fraud was rampant. Will only vote for candidates that hear our concerns on securing elections. It is the ONLY issue until it is solved.

---

There was no fraud that changed the outcome. Real Americans voted. You are destroying America with your lies.

---

inelligible votes were counted- thats voter dillution and it could have changed the outcome.

It must be corrected. In some places it was, in others, it wasnt..

If you think that any real audit was done, you are kidding yourself.

In most instances, No signature matches were done, no counts of envelope sleeves to ballots were done, and it goes on.. counting ballots again is the least effort that could be undertaken and doesnt remove any inelligible ballots. Chain of custody issues and lack of security footage make ballots inelligible as written in state election law, those were counted in many instances.

4th and Inches said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Stopped reading at 'false claims about the 2020 election.'

The fraud was rampant. Will only vote for candidates that hear our concerns on securing elections. It is the ONLY issue until it is solved.

---

There was no fraud that changed the outcome. Real Americans voted. You are destroying America with your lies.

---

inelligible votes were counted- thats voter dillution and it could have changed the outcome.

It must be corrected. In some places it was, in others, it wasnt..

If you think that any real audit was done, you are kidding yourself.

In most instances, No signature matches were done, no counts of envelope sleeves to ballots were done, and it goes on.. counting ballots again is the least effort that could be undertaken and doesnt remove any inelligible ballots. Chain of custody issues and lack of security footage make ballots inelligible as written in state election law, those were counted in many instances.

---

I've received multiple vote ballots from states not named Texas that I've considered filling out and mailing in.

Think they would be counted?

4th and Inches said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Stopped reading at 'false claims about the 2020 election.'

The fraud was rampant. Will only vote for candidates that hear our concerns on securing elections. It is the ONLY issue until it is solved.

---

There was no fraud that changed the outcome. Real Americans voted. You are destroying America with your lies.

---

inelligible votes were counted- thats voter dillution and it could have changed the outcome.

It must be corrected. In some places it was, in others, it wasnt..

If you think that any real audit was done, you are kidding yourself.

In most instances, No signature matches were done, no counts of envelope sleeves to ballots were done, and it goes on.. counting ballots again is the least effort that could be undertaken and doesnt remove any inelligible ballots. Chain of custody issues and lack of security footage make ballots inelligible as written in state election law, those were counted in many instances.

---

And this is exactly why so many decent (non establishment) candidates were selected in the primaries. Establishment gop got run over at almost every turn and did nothing. Pence is gone. McConnell needs to go. This new wave needs to get in and select new leaders.

And get the governors together to pass an amendment for term limits!

As long as we have electronic voting, any election can be stolen.

If you believe the results of 2020 based on the documented statistical analysis and bizarre happenings that night and next morning and vote harvesting videos we've all seen, well, you can't maths

But then again, if you believe it you prjbably also spent hundreds of hours of your life watching msnbc discuss the Russia Peepee dossier and believed Putin helped elect trump (while keeping his ass over in the corner for 4 years not making a peep magically) and also got the covid vaccine and N number of boosters.

That largely makes you ineligible for this discussion in any meaningful way

Fre3dombear said:

---

As long as we have electronic voting, any election can be stolen.

If you believe the results of 2020 based on the documented statistical analysis and bizarre happenings that night and next morning and vote harvesting videos we've all seen, well, you can't maths

But then again, if you believe it you prjbably also spent hundreds of hours of your life watching msnbc discuss the Russia Peepee dossier and believed Putin helped elect trump (while keeping his ass over in the corner for 4 years not making a peep magically) and also got the covid vaccine and N number of boosters.

That largely makes you ineligible for this discussion in any meaningful way

---

Exactly

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Stopped reading at 'false claims about the 2020 election.'

The fraud was rampant. Will only vote for candidates that hear our concerns on securing elections. It is the ONLY issue until it is solved.

---

There was no fraud that changed the outcome. Real Americans voted. You are destroying America with your lies.

---

A majority of Americans disagree with you.

whiterock said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Stopped reading at 'false claims about the 2020 election.'

The fraud was rampant. Will only vote for candidates that hear our concerns on securing elections. It is the ONLY issue until it is solved.

---

There was no fraud that changed the outcome. Real Americans voted. You are destroying America with your lies.

---

A majority of Americans disagree with you.

---

Debunked.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/02/viral-image/no-most-americans-dont-believe-2020-election-was-f/

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Stopped reading at 'false claims about the 2020 election.'

The fraud was rampant. Will only vote for candidates that hear our concerns on securing elections. It is the ONLY issue until it is solved.

---

There was no fraud that changed the outcome. Real Americans voted. You are destroying America with your lies.

---

A majority of Americans disagree with you.

---

Debunked.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/02/viral-image/no-most-americans-dont-believe-2020-election-was-f/

---

debunked!

Coming Up Today:@JoeBiden daily presidential job approval % is - up.

Election Integrity Is Top Midterms Issue

Majority of all U.S. voters remain convinced cheating affected the 2020 election, including 53% of Independents, 37% of Democrats and 77% of Republicans. https://t.co/k3fiF0AFpA

— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) May 25, 2022

Election integrity is a real issue for majority of Americans

There's a reason the poll with the incredibly vague question is an outlier.

Sam Lowry said:

---

There's a reason the poll with the incredibly vague question is an outlier.

---

There's a reason there is a red wave coming in a couple of weeks.

Sam Lowry said:

---

There's a reason the poll with the incredibly vague question is an outlier.

---

i came up with it in like 30 seconds.

Is there a reason you quoted a strongly left leaning/biased source?

Despite countless investigations, judicial hearings and forensic audits rejecting claims of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, just one in three Americans believe the 2022 midterms will be largely free of fraud, according to a new national poll from LX News and YouGov.

As I said, real or not, a majority of Americans believe it.

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Fre3dombear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Stopped reading at 'false claims about the 2020 election.'

The fraud was rampant. Will only vote for candidates that hear our concerns on securing elections. It is the ONLY issue until it is solved.

---

There was no fraud that changed the outcome. Real Americans voted. You are destroying America with your lies.

---

That's what they call useless eater

---

Yeah forgive me for caring about this big great country.

---

By "country", Porteroso, we all know you really mean 'political oligarchy'.

---

What tripe lol. How do you get to oligarchy? I complain about it all the time. The complete ineptitude is hard to deal with.

---

How long have Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, et all held power and office?

You back an oligarchy whether you admit it nor not.

Filed under Can't Make This Up - 60 Minutes running another propaganda regime piece about how it's impossible to hack voting machines ... because it's staffed with affirmative action ******s does not remember:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-when-russian-hackers-targeted-the-u-s-election-infrastructure/#app

Sam Lowry said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

The Wackadoodle Wave
If 1994 brought the Republican Revolution and 2010 delivered the Tea Party to D.C., the 2022 election may bring something even more extreme.
By David A. Graham



[Marjorie Taylor] Greene may have plenty of other company come January 2023. Driven by Trump and particularly by the prevalence of false claims about fraud in the 2020 election, the Republican Party is nominating more extreme candidates than ever for positions up and down the ballot. Because the electoral environment favors GOP candidates, a crop of people...is likely to be swept into office this year, with unpredictable and unsettling results. If 1994 brought the Republican Revolution and 2010 delivered the Tea Party to D.C., the 2022 election may go down as the Wackadoodle Wave.

Some of the wildest candidates...probably won't be known on the national stage until later. Most attention so far has focused on contested primary races in competitive districts, but solidly Republican constituencies may produce much more extreme candidates who never have much opposition.

When these candidates reach office, whether in Washington, state capitals, or local government, it won't necessarily represent an endorsement of their views by voters. A handful of dynamics are converging to produce results that can be out of line with the American public. The two major parties have sorted themselves into ideologically homogeneous groups, rather than the mixtures they once were. Polarization, especially negative polarization, means people are motivated as much by loathing of the other party as by any affirmative values. And the collapse of local news means candidates for lower-level offices don't receive close scrutiny.

But whether voters knew what they were getting into won't matter much by then. They'll be represented by officials who believe the Big Lie and other dubious ideas, and have the power to act on their beliefs. At the moment, Greene, Lauren Boebert, and Madison Cawthorn have the power mostly to marshal attention. With a larger group of confederates, they could exert serious sway over the House caucus. At other levels of government, some members of this wave could, for example, have responsibility for overseeing elections.

In 2016, Donald Trump won the GOP presidential primary by running against the party establishment. Now his endorsement has become the most powerful force in many races, because despite his unpopularity overall at the national level, GOP-primary voters revere him. The former president has used that influence to endorse a slew of extreme candidates who are MAGA true believers and to punish candidates who deviate from his line.

Of the extreme candidates running in 2022, some of them will surely end up defeating themselves by turning off moderate voters in general elections. But the sheer number of candidates running today who would never have made it through a primary in the past, combined with the wave of Republican victories up and down the ballot, means that a huge number of them will be elected to office.

As they do, they'll be closer to dominating the Republican Party. This year will see a host of departures by moderates as well as leaders who would have been viewed as staunch conservatives in 1994 or even 2010, but who MAGA types now regard as squishes or RINOs for their failure to offer complete fealty to Trump.

These Republicans stood for ideas such as low taxes, less regulation, and gun rights, and they often opposed even moderate reforms. Some were regarded in their day as bomb-throwers. But the GOP doesn't belong to them anymore. Come November, the wackadoodles shall inherit the Republican Party.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/05/republican-congressional-candidates-2022-midterm-elections/629733/

---

Kind of difficult to point to Greene, Boerbert and Cawthorn (who lost the primary, FYI) - three fringe figures in the party - and claim some type of Republican takeover by extremists. Those three were marginalized within the party. But I of course understand The Atlantic's motivations. Midterms are coming so they need to get out the Democrat vote. A little scare tactic might be useful.

Could one point to The Squad and say the same thing about Democrats? Of course, The Atlantic conveniently omits that from its oped.

---

The Squad doesn't constitute a wave, nor do Greene and Boebert on their own. The point is that Greene and Boebert are likely to be joined by a raft of others, some already known and some less so, who could give their faction real influence in the legislature. Could the same thing happen on the Democratic side? Sure, but that would be a different argument requiring its own evidence.

---

I agree that pointing to Greene, Boebert and Cawthorn doesn't prove any sort of wave whatsoever, which is why it's ridiculous The Atlantic even mentions them. But alas it does in an attempt to point to some fantastical takeover by people or their ilk - something that has little likelihood of happening.

The TDSers have quite the imagination.

C. Jordan said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

The Wackadoodle Wave
If 1994 brought the Republican Revolution and 2010 delivered the Tea Party to D.C., the 2022 election may bring something even more extreme.
By David A. Graham



[Marjorie Taylor] Greene may have plenty of other company come January 2023. Driven by Trump and particularly by the prevalence of false claims about fraud in the 2020 election, the Republican Party is nominating more extreme candidates than ever for positions up and down the ballot. Because the electoral environment favors GOP candidates, a crop of people...is likely to be swept into office this year, with unpredictable and unsettling results. If 1994 brought the Republican Revolution and 2010 delivered the Tea Party to D.C., the 2022 election may go down as the Wackadoodle Wave.

Some of the wildest candidates...probably won't be known on the national stage until later. Most attention so far has focused on contested primary races in competitive districts, but solidly Republican constituencies may produce much more extreme candidates who never have much opposition.

When these candidates reach office, whether in Washington, state capitals, or local government, it won't necessarily represent an endorsement of their views by voters. A handful of dynamics are converging to produce results that can be out of line with the American public. The two major parties have sorted themselves into ideologically homogeneous groups, rather than the mixtures they once were. Polarization, especially negative polarization, means people are motivated as much by loathing of the other party as by any affirmative values. And the collapse of local news means candidates for lower-level offices don't receive close scrutiny.

But whether voters knew what they were getting into won't matter much by then. They'll be represented by officials who believe the Big Lie and other dubious ideas, and have the power to act on their beliefs. At the moment, Greene, Lauren Boebert, and Madison Cawthorn have the power mostly to marshal attention. With a larger group of confederates, they could exert serious sway over the House caucus. At other levels of government, some members of this wave could, for example, have responsibility for overseeing elections.

In 2016, Donald Trump won the GOP presidential primary by running against the party establishment. Now his endorsement has become the most powerful force in many races, because despite his unpopularity overall at the national level, GOP-primary voters revere him. The former president has used that influence to endorse a slew of extreme candidates who are MAGA true believers and to punish candidates who deviate from his line.

Of the extreme candidates running in 2022, some of them will surely end up defeating themselves by turning off moderate voters in general elections. But the sheer number of candidates running today who would never have made it through a primary in the past, combined with the wave of Republican victories up and down the ballot, means that a huge number of them will be elected to office.

As they do, they'll be closer to dominating the Republican Party. This year will see a host of departures by moderates as well as leaders who would have been viewed as staunch conservatives in 1994 or even 2010, but who MAGA types now regard as squishes or RINOs for their failure to offer complete fealty to Trump.

These Republicans stood for ideas such as low taxes, less regulation, and gun rights, and they often opposed even moderate reforms. Some were regarded in their day as bomb-throwers. But the GOP doesn't belong to them anymore. Come November, the wackadoodles shall inherit the Republican Party.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/05/republican-congressional-candidates-2022-midterm-elections/629733/

---

McCarthy is already showing it's going to be crazytown in the House if Republicans take control, and that seems likely.

It could turn out well for Democrats as America will be so sickened at what they see, they will tilt heavy to Dems in '24.

McCarthy has already indicated that he's willing to be irresponsible and play chicken with the debt ceiling to extort Democrats.

And if McCarthy doesn't bend the knee to Trump and other radicals, they will replace him with someone even less responsible.

At any rate, we will at least have government dysfunction and gridlock.

On top of that, Trump will probably run, thiinking the fix will be in for him. And one of the few people less popular than Joe Biden right now is Trump.

---

I love reading democrat fantasy. It's always amusing.

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

This is what did it…pic.twitter.com/QML3YuzP1S

— DISSIDENT (@philthatremains) October 24, 2022

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Printing trillions over budget leading to economic turmoil is evil, yes .

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Printing trillions over budget leading to economic turmoil is evil, yes .

---

I doubt we'd be better off with more failed businesses resulting in more shortages.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Printing trillions over budget leading to economic turmoil is evil, yes .

---

I doubt we'd be better off with more failed businesses resulting in more shortages.

---

We'd be better off reducing government spending, significantly.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Printing trillions over budget leading to economic turmoil is evil, yes .

---

I doubt we'd be better off with more failed businesses resulting in more shortages.

---

We'd be better off reducing government spending, significantly.

---

Yes, but as the chairman pointed out, there's a right time and a wrong time to prioritize that. The pandemic wasn't the right time.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Printing trillions over budget leading to economic turmoil is evil, yes .

---

I doubt we'd be better off with more failed businesses resulting in more shortages.

---

We'd be better off reducing government spending, significantly.

---

Yes, but as the chairman pointed out, there's a right time and a wrong time to prioritize that. The pandemic wasn't the right time.

---

If we hadn't shut down the economy, perhaps.

Mothra said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Printing trillions over budget leading to economic turmoil is evil, yes .

---

I doubt we'd be better off with more failed businesses resulting in more shortages.

---

We'd be better off reducing government spending, significantly.

---

Yes, but as the chairman pointed out, there's a right time and a wrong time to prioritize that. The pandemic wasn't the right time.

---

If we hadn't shut down the economy, perhaps.

---

Then it would still have slowed in reaction to events.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Printing trillions over budget leading to economic turmoil is evil, yes .

---

I doubt we'd be better off with more failed businesses resulting in more shortages.

---

We'd be better off reducing government spending, significantly.

---

Yes, but as the chairman pointed out, there's a right time and a wrong time to prioritize that. The pandemic wasn't the right time.

---

The right time to prioritize government spending was at least 30 years ago. My point is we have normalized lunacy. We think our spending is sane, it's not.

Lockdowns and covid measures weren't justified and now we're paying the price.

Record credit card debt.
Millions will lose their jobs and homes.
Kids behind in school.

We're reaping what we sewed and it's getting ugly. This is the price we're paying for you, big pharma and big gov getting their way.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Printing trillions over budget leading to economic turmoil is evil, yes .

---

I doubt we'd be better off with more failed businesses resulting in more shortages.

---

We'd be better off reducing government spending, significantly.

---

Yes, but as the chairman pointed out, there's a right time and a wrong time to prioritize that. The pandemic wasn't the right time.

---

The right time to prioritize government spending was at least 30 years ago. My point is we have normalized lunacy. We think our spending is sane, it's not.

Lockdowns and covid measures weren't justified and now we're paying the price.

Record credit card debt.
Millions will lose their jobs and homes.
Kids behind in school.

We're reaping what we sewed and it's getting ugly. This is the price we're paying for you, big pharma and big gov getting their way.

---

A pandemic is a national security issue and a responsibility of the government. You may not agree with everything about the response, but that doesn't make it evil.

Anyway...the less you like big government, the more we need a sane, capable conservative party. Not a bunch of wackadoodles.

riflebear said:

---

---

one banana two banana three banana four....

"The Pandemic" did not justify shutting down thousands of small businesses while applying different rules to Corporations.

"The Pandemic" did not justify shutting down schools for an entire year.

"The Pandemic" did not justify shutting down the court system in many states.

"The Pandemic" did not justify denying in-person Church attendance.

"The Pandemic" did not justify firing health workers already immune to COVID because they spent months working with patients, for refusing to take an experimental and unproven vaccine which offered no real protection.

"The Pandemic" did not justify granting absolute immunity from lawsuits to Pfizer and Moderna.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Printing trillions over budget leading to economic turmoil is evil, yes .

---

I doubt we'd be better off with more failed businesses resulting in more shortages.

---

We'd be better off reducing government spending, significantly.

---

Yes, but as the chairman pointed out, there's a right time and a wrong time to prioritize that. The pandemic wasn't the right time.

---

The right time to prioritize government spending was at least 30 years ago. My point is we have normalized lunacy. We think our spending is sane, it's not.

Lockdowns and covid measures weren't justified and now we're paying the price.

Record credit card debt.
Millions will lose their jobs and homes.
Kids behind in school.

We're reaping what we sewed and it's getting ugly. This is the price we're paying for you, big pharma and big gov getting their way.

---

A pandemic is a national security issue and a responsibility of the government. You may not agree with everything about the response, but that doesn't make it evil.

Anyway...the less you like big government, the more we need a sane, capable conservative party. Not a bunch of wackadoodles.

---

Neocons are the wackadoodles.

Romneys, Grahams, Paul Ryan types are the problem with the GOP.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Printing trillions over budget leading to economic turmoil is evil, yes .

---

I doubt we'd be better off with more failed businesses resulting in more shortages.

---

We'd be better off reducing government spending, significantly.

---

Yes, but as the chairman pointed out, there's a right time and a wrong time to prioritize that. The pandemic wasn't the right time.

---

The right time to prioritize government spending was at least 30 years ago. My point is we have normalized lunacy. We think our spending is sane, it's not.

Lockdowns and covid measures weren't justified and now we're paying the price.

Record credit card debt.
Millions will lose their jobs and homes.
Kids behind in school.

We're reaping what we sewed and it's getting ugly. This is the price we're paying for you, big pharma and big gov getting their way.

---

A pandemic is a national security issue and a responsibility of the government. You may not agree with everything about the response, but that doesn't make it evil.

Anyway...the less you like big government, the more we need a sane, capable conservative party. Not a bunch of wackadoodles.

---

Agreed, not evil. Just stupid.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Debt you can't afford to repay is evil, yes. Volitional debt you can't afford is greed and irresponsible.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

This is more evil, radical and dangerous than anything in your wackadoodle article:

---

Borrowing money is evil?

---

Printing trillions over budget leading to economic turmoil is evil, yes .

---

I doubt we'd be better off with more failed businesses resulting in more shortages.

---

We'd be better off reducing government spending, significantly.

---

Yes, but as the chairman pointed out, there's a right time and a wrong time to prioritize that. The pandemic wasn't the right time.

---

The right time to prioritize government spending was at least 30 years ago. My point is we have normalized lunacy. We think our spending is sane, it's not.

Lockdowns and covid measures weren't justified and now we're paying the price.

Record credit card debt.
Millions will lose their jobs and homes.
Kids behind in school.

We're reaping what we sewed and it's getting ugly. This is the price we're paying for you, big pharma and big gov getting their way.

---

A pandemic is a national security issue and a responsibility of the government. You may not agree with everything about the response, but that doesn't make it evil.

Anyway...the less you like big government, the more we need a sane, capable conservative party. Not a bunch of wackadoodles.

---

Neocons are the wackadoodles.

Romneys, Grahams, Paul Ryan types are the problem with the GOP.

---

Neocons and wackadoodles are different manifestations of the same problem, i.e. contempt for the law and the Constitution.