2024

648,320 Views | 10627 Replies | Last: 24 min ago by boognish_bear
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/


C'mon, man, that's Trump's pollster . . . .

Yes, national polls are close, but the tabs still look bad, and I've seen no polls or data showing Trump dominating the battlegrounds. GA, WI, AZ, and PA have been consistently bad. MI showing some life, but few MI insiders think Trump would actually win there.
Trump Losing Significant Ground to Biden among White Voters, New Analysis Finds

Donald Trump's lead over President Biden among white voters has been cut almost in half since 2020, with the former president's loss of support among white voters outpacing any gains he has made with black voters, a new analysis finds.

While Trump led Biden among white voters by 17 percentage points in 2020 exit polls, he's now leading Biden by an 8.8-point margin in recent polling, according to an analysis from Republican polling firm WPA Intelligence.

The analysis included a review of the six most recent polls featured on RealClearPolitics that had publicly available cross-tabs on race. Five of those polls showed Trump "well below his 2020 levels with whites and an average of all six polls revealed that he has lost nearly half of his lead over Biden among whites since 2020," Bryon Allen, a partner with WPA Intelligence, told National Review in a statement.


Allen explained that Trump's losses largely occurred among white college-educated voters, which he noted is consistent with trends that began in 2018, though there was also some erosion among white voters without degrees, he said.


"Barring some miracle or a third-party candidate that splinters the Democrats, if Trump is the nominee and is only nine points up against Biden with whites, he has little chance of winning the election," he said. "It's worth recalling that John McCain outperformed Barack Obama by twelve points with white voters in 2012 and lost in a landslide."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-losing-significant-ground-to-biden-among-white-voters-new-analysis-finds/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=article&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=more-in-tag&utm_term=first



4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/


C'mon, man, that's Trump's pollster . . . .

Yes, national polls are close, but the tabs still look bad, and I've seen no polls or data showing Trump dominating the battlegrounds. GA, WI, AZ, and PA have been consistently bad. MI showing some life, but few MI insiders think Trump would actually win there.
Trump Losing Significant Ground to Biden among White Voters, New Analysis Finds

Donald Trump's lead over President Biden among white voters has been cut almost in half since 2020, with the former president's loss of support among white voters outpacing any gains he has made with black voters, a new analysis finds.

While Trump led Biden among white voters by 17 percentage points in 2020 exit polls, he's now leading Biden by an 8.8-point margin in recent polling, according to an analysis from Republican polling firm WPA Intelligence.

The analysis included a review of the six most recent polls featured on RealClearPolitics that had publicly available cross-tabs on race. Five of those polls showed Trump "well below his 2020 levels with whites and an average of all six polls revealed that he has lost nearly half of his lead over Biden among whites since 2020," Bryon Allen, a partner with WPA Intelligence, told National Review in a statement.


Allen explained that Trump's losses largely occurred among white college-educated voters, which he noted is consistent with trends that began in 2018, though there was also some erosion among white voters without degrees, he said.


"Barring some miracle or a third-party candidate that splinters the Democrats, if Trump is the nominee and is only nine points up against Biden with whites, he has little chance of winning the election," he said. "It's worth recalling that John McCain outperformed Barack Obama by twelve points with white voters in 2012 and lost in a landslide."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-losing-significant-ground-to-biden-among-white-voters-new-analysis-finds/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=article&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=more-in-tag&utm_term=first




because obama pulled the minority vote which Trump is polling higher than any prior GOP in a long time.

I am not saying they balance out but you have to account for the polling changes in all segments.
Adopt-a-Bear 2024

#90 COOPER LANZ ( DL )
CLASS Junior
HT/WT 6' 3", 288 lbs


#50 KAIAN ROBERTS-DAY ( DL )
CLASS Sophomore
HT/WT 6' 3", 273 lbs
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/


C'mon, man, that's Trump's pollster . . . .

Yes, national polls are close, but the tabs still look bad, and I've seen no polls or data showing Trump dominating the battlegrounds. GA, WI, AZ, and PA have been consistently bad. MI showing some life, but few MI insiders think Trump would actually win there.
Trump Losing Significant Ground to Biden among White Voters, New Analysis Finds

Donald Trump's lead over President Biden among white voters has been cut almost in half since 2020, with the former president's loss of support among white voters outpacing any gains he has made with black voters, a new analysis finds.

While Trump led Biden among white voters by 17 percentage points in 2020 exit polls, he's now leading Biden by an 8.8-point margin in recent polling, according to an analysis from Republican polling firm WPA Intelligence.

The analysis included a review of the six most recent polls featured on RealClearPolitics that had publicly available cross-tabs on race. Five of those polls showed Trump "well below his 2020 levels with whites and an average of all six polls revealed that he has lost nearly half of his lead over Biden among whites since 2020," Bryon Allen, a partner with WPA Intelligence, told National Review in a statement.


Allen explained that Trump's losses largely occurred among white college-educated voters, which he noted is consistent with trends that began in 2018, though there was also some erosion among white voters without degrees, he said.


"Barring some miracle or a third-party candidate that splinters the Democrats, if Trump is the nominee and is only nine points up against Biden with whites, he has little chance of winning the election," he said. "It's worth recalling that John McCain outperformed Barack Obama by twelve points with white voters in 2012 and lost in a landslide."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-losing-significant-ground-to-biden-among-white-voters-new-analysis-finds/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=article&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=more-in-tag&utm_term=first




because obama pulled the minority vote which Trump is polling higher than any prior GOP in a long time.

I am not saying they balance out but you have to account for the polling changes in all segments.


Yep
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Trump Says He'd Have 'No Choice' But to Lock Up Political Opponents if He Wins in 2024


Former president Donald Trump recently said he'd have "no choice" but to lock up his political opponents if he wins the 2024 presidential race because his opponents are already doing the same to him and his allies.

Trump's comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Tuesday.

Beck noted that Trump led chants of "lock her up" about Hillary Clinton in 2016. "And then when you became president, you said, 'We don't do that in America. That's just not the right thing to do,'" Beck said. "That's what they're doing. Do you regret not locking her up? And if you're president again, will you lock people up?"

"Well, I'll give you an example," Trump said. "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us."

"I always had such great respect for the office of the president and the presidency," he added. "And I never hit Biden as hard as I could have. And then I heard he was trying to indict me and it was him that was doing it."

While Trump suggested Biden was the driving force behind "every one of" the four indictments he's facing, he said: "I don't think he's sharp enough to think about much, but he was there, and he was probably the one giving the order."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-says-hed-have-no-choice-but-to-lock-up-political-opponents-if-he-wins-in-2024/






Trump had a chance in 2016 to go down the road the Dems are taking now. And he didn't. And how did they pay him back? By literally making stuff up to indict him over. He's got every right to punch back, and voters understand that. His supporters love it and it will not hurt him in the middle like you want it to.

Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Trump Says He'd Have 'No Choice' But to Lock Up Political Opponents if He Wins in 2024


Former president Donald Trump recently said he'd have "no choice" but to lock up his political opponents if he wins the 2024 presidential race because his opponents are already doing the same to him and his allies.

Trump's comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Tuesday.

Beck noted that Trump led chants of "lock her up" about Hillary Clinton in 2016. "And then when you became president, you said, 'We don't do that in America. That's just not the right thing to do,'" Beck said. "That's what they're doing. Do you regret not locking her up? And if you're president again, will you lock people up?"

"Well, I'll give you an example," Trump said. "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us."

"I always had such great respect for the office of the president and the presidency," he added. "And I never hit Biden as hard as I could have. And then I heard he was trying to indict me and it was him that was doing it."

While Trump suggested Biden was the driving force behind "every one of" the four indictments he's facing, he said: "I don't think he's sharp enough to think about much, but he was there, and he was probably the one giving the order."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-says-hed-have-no-choice-but-to-lock-up-political-opponents-if-he-wins-in-2024/






Trump had a chance in 2016 to go down the road the Dems are taking now. And he didn't. And how did they pay him back? By literally making stuff up to indict him over. He's got every right to punch back, and voters understand that. His supporters love it and it will not hurt him in the middle like you want it to.




We'll see
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

4th and Inches said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/


C'mon, man, that's Trump's pollster . . . .

Yes, national polls are close, but the tabs still look bad, and I've seen no polls or data showing Trump dominating the battlegrounds. GA, WI, AZ, and PA have been consistently bad. MI showing some life, but few MI insiders think Trump would actually win there.
Trump Losing Significant Ground to Biden among White Voters, New Analysis Finds

Donald Trump's lead over President Biden among white voters has been cut almost in half since 2020, with the former president's loss of support among white voters outpacing any gains he has made with black voters, a new analysis finds.

While Trump led Biden among white voters by 17 percentage points in 2020 exit polls, he's now leading Biden by an 8.8-point margin in recent polling, according to an analysis from Republican polling firm WPA Intelligence.

The analysis included a review of the six most recent polls featured on RealClearPolitics that had publicly available cross-tabs on race. Five of those polls showed Trump "well below his 2020 levels with whites and an average of all six polls revealed that he has lost nearly half of his lead over Biden among whites since 2020," Bryon Allen, a partner with WPA Intelligence, told National Review in a statement.


Allen explained that Trump's losses largely occurred among white college-educated voters, which he noted is consistent with trends that began in 2018, though there was also some erosion among white voters without degrees, he said.


"Barring some miracle or a third-party candidate that splinters the Democrats, if Trump is the nominee and is only nine points up against Biden with whites, he has little chance of winning the election," he said. "It's worth recalling that John McCain outperformed Barack Obama by twelve points with white voters in 2012 and lost in a landslide."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-losing-significant-ground-to-biden-among-white-voters-new-analysis-finds/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=article&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=more-in-tag&utm_term=first




because obama pulled the minority vote which Trump is polling higher than any prior GOP in a long time.

I am not saying they balance out but you have to account for the polling changes in all segments.


Yep
The electorate is changing. Widely reported over last several years that the GOP is moving toward a multi-racial working class party. Loss of margins with white voters is a part of that. Picking up percentage points with minorities, too. Hispanics are moving toward majority GOP support.

Class dynamics explain a lot. This forum, for example, is not a Trump demographic. Almost everyone here is college educated and top 10% income/wealthy categories. Why would MTG be so unpopular here? Because she fits Jerry Jeff Walker tropes about the "cocktail waitress in a Dolly Parton wig"....loud-mouthed red-neck women we hope our sons never bring home. Nobody WANTS her to become the avatar for our political aspirations. But she does appeal to a big slice of the standard deviation that we need to vote red.

Dems, by comparison, have no compunction at all caucusing with people they otherwise would not socialize with. It's part of the reason they win. They nurture their base, and appreciate what they can accomplish. Too many on our side, by comparison, are repulsed by our crazies and try to drive them out of the tent. We then feel better about ourselves, no matter the outcome of the election.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

KaiBear said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.
100% correct.

Trump will bring out the Dem vote better than any Dem nominee possibly could.

Why some folks are determined to go down in flames again with the old fat man I cant comprehend.
Yup. It's mind boggling.
I'm a DeSantis guy... but it's equally mind boggling that the never Trumpers would sit at home and not vote for him if he wins the primary.

I know if Trump beats DeSantis, I'll be casting my ballot for the orange dude.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's a wild idea... for all the screaming the never Trumpers and the only Trumpers are doing to each other, trying to blame each other if democrats win the white house in 2024... how about the Never Trumpers vote for Trump if he wins the primary. If he loses the primary, then how about the only Trumpers vote for the other person that did win.

If you can't bring yourself to do that and the extreme democrats waltz back into the White House, you only have yourself to blame.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/



Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




This is a sham poll. Among other things, it has Trump almost even among Blacks and dominating young voters. No other polls have had anything close to that.


Outlier for sure. Posted mostly because neither 538 nor CBS has ever been Trump friendly. And some here see 538 in particular as reputable. And I think they beat the RCP average in the midterms, IIRC. So we can't ash-can it. It has to sit on the table to review and force questions about what is going on.
I was not a fan of 538 in the early years, but now it is primarily a poll aggregator.

Unrelated to 538, 3 polls out showing Biden up on Trump 3-6 points. Two new Biden approval polls, 47 and 43. And generic ballot Dem 45 GOP 42. No bueno.
I think at this point we could find a poll to please anyone. All over the map......
Show me 2 actual pollsters that have Trump's approvals higher than Biden and I'll at least partially agree . . . .
There are several that not only have him ahead in support, but winning independents by a margin greater than the overall margin.

I'm not contesting that "approvals" matter, just noting that "approval rate" is not synonymous with "who do you intend to vote for." That is particularly true given the "margin of error" separation between the two guys in almost every poll, regardless of who's on top or bottom.

We will indeed have people making the eminently rational choice to vote for Trump despite thinking Biden is a nicer guy.
While I don't disagree with this, you must surely realize that the same holds true for Biden. While there are a lot of Democrats and independents who don't approve of Biden, because they hate Trump with the passion of a thousand burning suns, they will make the choice to vote for Biden, despite thinking he's done a pretty crappy job as president.

When our only hope for getting our unlikable candidate elected is that the other candidate will be less likable, we are in pretty serious trouble.


Ever heard the saying, "Opinions are like a--holes. Everyone has one"?

Substitute polls for opinions, and it has essentially the same meaning.


For sure that could apply to every post on this forum.

The data is the data. It's can't really be dispositive when the numbers are so close, and in any event we can't read too much into it this far out in front of the election. But, and this is important......the data does not decisively support the arguments of the "can't win" caucus. It actually fits better the argument I've been making = the race is at this point competitive. We will have a better idea 9 months from now when we know exactly who will be the candidates and a better feel for what will be the 2-3 issues that will be most important to voters. Who knows, Biden may be gone and Harris may be President. Or Newsom may be on a coronation tour. If so, Kennedy may catch a 2nd wind.

Dems have a real dilemma on their hands if Biden doesn't make the ticket, for whatever reason. Harris is almost by acclamation the weakest of the visible options, yet they cannot skip over her without tearing a hole in their bucket. So it's not like they're supermen over on the other side. They can and do make mistakes, fail to fix their own problems.

As I've been saying, supporters of candidates other than Trump have got to find a better argument than electability. It's clearly not working. And it won't unless he's campaigning from jail. (which is the least likely of all options).
I think the last sentence of your post is far more likely than you're willing to admit, especially in GA and in the documents case.

You keep focusing on electability being a poor argument, while continuing to proffer an equally poor argument - banking on Biden being even less popular than Trump. When you run a very poor and disliked candidate and hope that his opponent will be even less likeable and unpopular, that is typically a recipe for disaster in an election. The fact is Trump has gotten even less popular than he was in 2019/2020, and Biden's approval numbers, while not great, are still better than Trump's (holding steady around 41% compared to Trump's 39%) - this despite Biden being a geriatric patient whose administration has been a total disaster. If Biden were to step down, and it becomes Newsom vs. Trump (the most likely of alternative scenarios, IMO), then Trump gets beaten in a landslide, IMO.

We already have 2020 as proof that Trump has an electability issue. The idea that his changes are improved in 2024 is simply not borne out by the evidence. We shouldn't ignore past mistakes in our analysis.
LOL that part in italics. Pointing out that BOTH candidates have electability issues is not adopting the electability argument. It's merely noting the fact there is no clear advantage on the question of electablity = 99% of public polling shows neither candidate ahead by a margin greater than the margin of error.

Holding assessments in reserve to determine future trends is not self-serving analysis. It is wise analysis. Biden is in office. He cannot just go to basement and let staffers critique the incumbent. HE is the incumbent. He will be held accountable to some degree for the good/bad that happens over the next 18 months. And it is hardly unreasonable to look at the landscape and assess that the odds of developments working against him are greater than the odds of developments working in his favor. 2020 was a referendum on Trump; 2024 will likely be a referendum on Biden. And Biden is an incredibly weak incumbent.

Admittedly, it will be an ugly contest.
Sure, I'd rather not have an ugly contest.
But we can't fret about what we'd like.
We have to figure out a way to win the contest we're gonna get.

And we can.
LOL at your denial. Come on, whiterock. You have been attacking the electability of Trump argument since the get go, while continually advocating Biden's approval and popularity decreasing.

Again, if job approval is any barometer (and it is), Biden has remained steady around 41% and Trump around 39% for more than a year. So, Trump is still coming up short in that area. And you also seem to want to discount that this is essentially a race between two incumbents. America has already rejected Trump once. So his track record in that area isn't good.

It's highly unlikely at this point Trump is going to increase in popularity, so the only hope is that Biden decreases. What remains true of both candidates, however, is that many of those who disapprove of the candidate will still vote for them over the alternative.

Is there a slim hope Trump can do something he's been unable to do since 2016? Sure. But there's not much hope based on the evidence.
I've attacked the electability argument because it has obvious flaws. That nearly 2/3rds of GOP voters don't buy it tends to ratify the assessment to that end I offered after the mid-terms. They didn't/don't buy it party because the polling at best hints at it, and mostly because they know it's not a static issue - that Biden is indeed likely to be weaker as time goes on, for a number of well-discussed reasons.

Popularity is an important issue, but it's not dispositive. People do vote for people they don't like.......because they don't like the other guy either, or like him a lot less. And to that end, the very likeability argument one could make against Trump applies also to Biden. Again, your entire case here is implicitly static.....that only Trump's likeability matters, that Biden's could not deteriorate below Trump's, etc.... My assessment would be different if Trump was running against someone beloved. But he's not. (at least yet).

We have a closely divided election. Not terribly many people are going to have to change their minds to win in 2024. Six digits or less, across a small handful of states. What Biden is doing to Trump in court could end up hurting Biden's likeability more than Trump's. There's evidence of it now. And Trump is not going to let that issue glide. See Oso's link above. Trump is going to pick up the turd and shove it in Biden's nose. So far, it's playing well.

Part of your problem is your polling numbers. I haven't seen the kind of stasis you noted. They've fluctuated a bit. (Biden support is at an all-time low at Rasmussen after being right at 50 only a few weeks ago.) But regardless.....a 2-point difference in likeability in a polling universe that has a 3-point margin of error and......well, that's like trying to hang my Cape Buffalo mount on a 16-penny nail. Not well supported. We do have some good candidates, though. I'll be a happy warrior for all of them except Hutchinson and Christie. I'll hold my nose and vote for those two as well, but I won't like it, just like I didn't like it when I had to vote for Romney. People do vote for people they don't like, from time to time, ya know.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

4th and Inches said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/


C'mon, man, that's Trump's pollster . . . .

Yes, national polls are close, but the tabs still look bad, and I've seen no polls or data showing Trump dominating the battlegrounds. GA, WI, AZ, and PA have been consistently bad. MI showing some life, but few MI insiders think Trump would actually win there.
Trump Losing Significant Ground to Biden among White Voters, New Analysis Finds

Donald Trump's lead over President Biden among white voters has been cut almost in half since 2020, with the former president's loss of support among white voters outpacing any gains he has made with black voters, a new analysis finds.

While Trump led Biden among white voters by 17 percentage points in 2020 exit polls, he's now leading Biden by an 8.8-point margin in recent polling, according to an analysis from Republican polling firm WPA Intelligence.

The analysis included a review of the six most recent polls featured on RealClearPolitics that had publicly available cross-tabs on race. Five of those polls showed Trump "well below his 2020 levels with whites and an average of all six polls revealed that he has lost nearly half of his lead over Biden among whites since 2020," Bryon Allen, a partner with WPA Intelligence, told National Review in a statement.


Allen explained that Trump's losses largely occurred among white college-educated voters, which he noted is consistent with trends that began in 2018, though there was also some erosion among white voters without degrees, he said.


"Barring some miracle or a third-party candidate that splinters the Democrats, if Trump is the nominee and is only nine points up against Biden with whites, he has little chance of winning the election," he said. "It's worth recalling that John McCain outperformed Barack Obama by twelve points with white voters in 2012 and lost in a landslide."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-losing-significant-ground-to-biden-among-white-voters-new-analysis-finds/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=article&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=more-in-tag&utm_term=first




because obama pulled the minority vote which Trump is polling higher than any prior GOP in a long time.

I am not saying they balance out but you have to account for the polling changes in all segments.


Yep

Too many on our side, by comparison, are repulsed by our crazies and try to drive them out of the tent.

I am repulsed by your crazies, but I left the tent
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

4th and Inches said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/


C'mon, man, that's Trump's pollster . . . .

Yes, national polls are close, but the tabs still look bad, and I've seen no polls or data showing Trump dominating the battlegrounds. GA, WI, AZ, and PA have been consistently bad. MI showing some life, but few MI insiders think Trump would actually win there.
Trump Losing Significant Ground to Biden among White Voters, New Analysis Finds

Donald Trump's lead over President Biden among white voters has been cut almost in half since 2020, with the former president's loss of support among white voters outpacing any gains he has made with black voters, a new analysis finds.

While Trump led Biden among white voters by 17 percentage points in 2020 exit polls, he's now leading Biden by an 8.8-point margin in recent polling, according to an analysis from Republican polling firm WPA Intelligence.

The analysis included a review of the six most recent polls featured on RealClearPolitics that had publicly available cross-tabs on race. Five of those polls showed Trump "well below his 2020 levels with whites and an average of all six polls revealed that he has lost nearly half of his lead over Biden among whites since 2020," Bryon Allen, a partner with WPA Intelligence, told National Review in a statement.


Allen explained that Trump's losses largely occurred among white college-educated voters, which he noted is consistent with trends that began in 2018, though there was also some erosion among white voters without degrees, he said.


"Barring some miracle or a third-party candidate that splinters the Democrats, if Trump is the nominee and is only nine points up against Biden with whites, he has little chance of winning the election," he said. "It's worth recalling that John McCain outperformed Barack Obama by twelve points with white voters in 2012 and lost in a landslide."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-losing-significant-ground-to-biden-among-white-voters-new-analysis-finds/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=article&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=more-in-tag&utm_term=first




because obama pulled the minority vote which Trump is polling higher than any prior GOP in a long time.

I am not saying they balance out but you have to account for the polling changes in all segments.


Yep

Too many on our side, by comparison, are repulsed by our crazies and try to drive them out of the tent.

I am repulsed by your crazies, but I left the tent
GOOD!
Go play with Democrats for a while. They need the kind of help you are offering.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Mothra said:

KaiBear said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.
100% correct.

Trump will bring out the Dem vote better than any Dem nominee possibly could.

Why some folks are determined to go down in flames again with the old fat man I cant comprehend.
Yup. It's mind boggling.
I'm a DeSantis guy... but it's equally mind boggling that the never Trumpers would sit at home and not vote for him if he wins the primary.

I know if Trump beats DeSantis, I'll be casting my ballot for the orange dude.


Don't disagree with this
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

4th and Inches said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/


C'mon, man, that's Trump's pollster . . . .

Yes, national polls are close, but the tabs still look bad, and I've seen no polls or data showing Trump dominating the battlegrounds. GA, WI, AZ, and PA have been consistently bad. MI showing some life, but few MI insiders think Trump would actually win there.
Trump Losing Significant Ground to Biden among White Voters, New Analysis Finds

Donald Trump's lead over President Biden among white voters has been cut almost in half since 2020, with the former president's loss of support among white voters outpacing any gains he has made with black voters, a new analysis finds.

While Trump led Biden among white voters by 17 percentage points in 2020 exit polls, he's now leading Biden by an 8.8-point margin in recent polling, according to an analysis from Republican polling firm WPA Intelligence.

The analysis included a review of the six most recent polls featured on RealClearPolitics that had publicly available cross-tabs on race. Five of those polls showed Trump "well below his 2020 levels with whites and an average of all six polls revealed that he has lost nearly half of his lead over Biden among whites since 2020," Bryon Allen, a partner with WPA Intelligence, told National Review in a statement.


Allen explained that Trump's losses largely occurred among white college-educated voters, which he noted is consistent with trends that began in 2018, though there was also some erosion among white voters without degrees, he said.


"Barring some miracle or a third-party candidate that splinters the Democrats, if Trump is the nominee and is only nine points up against Biden with whites, he has little chance of winning the election," he said. "It's worth recalling that John McCain outperformed Barack Obama by twelve points with white voters in 2012 and lost in a landslide."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-losing-significant-ground-to-biden-among-white-voters-new-analysis-finds/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=article&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=more-in-tag&utm_term=first




because obama pulled the minority vote which Trump is polling higher than any prior GOP in a long time.

I am not saying they balance out but you have to account for the polling changes in all segments.


Yep

Too many on our side, by comparison, are repulsed by our crazies and try to drive them out of the tent.

I am repulsed by your crazies, but I left the tent


Gone full, democrat?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

4th and Inches said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/


C'mon, man, that's Trump's pollster . . . .

Yes, national polls are close, but the tabs still look bad, and I've seen no polls or data showing Trump dominating the battlegrounds. GA, WI, AZ, and PA have been consistently bad. MI showing some life, but few MI insiders think Trump would actually win there.
Trump Losing Significant Ground to Biden among White Voters, New Analysis Finds

Donald Trump's lead over President Biden among white voters has been cut almost in half since 2020, with the former president's loss of support among white voters outpacing any gains he has made with black voters, a new analysis finds.

While Trump led Biden among white voters by 17 percentage points in 2020 exit polls, he's now leading Biden by an 8.8-point margin in recent polling, according to an analysis from Republican polling firm WPA Intelligence.

The analysis included a review of the six most recent polls featured on RealClearPolitics that had publicly available cross-tabs on race. Five of those polls showed Trump "well below his 2020 levels with whites and an average of all six polls revealed that he has lost nearly half of his lead over Biden among whites since 2020," Bryon Allen, a partner with WPA Intelligence, told National Review in a statement.


Allen explained that Trump's losses largely occurred among white college-educated voters, which he noted is consistent with trends that began in 2018, though there was also some erosion among white voters without degrees, he said.


"Barring some miracle or a third-party candidate that splinters the Democrats, if Trump is the nominee and is only nine points up against Biden with whites, he has little chance of winning the election," he said. "It's worth recalling that John McCain outperformed Barack Obama by twelve points with white voters in 2012 and lost in a landslide."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-losing-significant-ground-to-biden-among-white-voters-new-analysis-finds/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=article&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=more-in-tag&utm_term=first




because obama pulled the minority vote which Trump is polling higher than any prior GOP in a long time.

I am not saying they balance out but you have to account for the polling changes in all segments.


Yep

Too many on our side, by comparison, are repulsed by our crazies and try to drive them out of the tent.

I am repulsed by your crazies, but I left the tent
GOOD!
Go play with Democrats for a while. They need the kind of help you are offering.


I'll be playing with Independents
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/



Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




This is a sham poll. Among other things, it has Trump almost even among Blacks and dominating young voters. No other polls have had anything close to that.


Outlier for sure. Posted mostly because neither 538 nor CBS has ever been Trump friendly. And some here see 538 in particular as reputable. And I think they beat the RCP average in the midterms, IIRC. So we can't ash-can it. It has to sit on the table to review and force questions about what is going on.
I was not a fan of 538 in the early years, but now it is primarily a poll aggregator.

Unrelated to 538, 3 polls out showing Biden up on Trump 3-6 points. Two new Biden approval polls, 47 and 43. And generic ballot Dem 45 GOP 42. No bueno.
I think at this point we could find a poll to please anyone. All over the map......
Show me 2 actual pollsters that have Trump's approvals higher than Biden and I'll at least partially agree . . . .
There are several that not only have him ahead in support, but winning independents by a margin greater than the overall margin.

I'm not contesting that "approvals" matter, just noting that "approval rate" is not synonymous with "who do you intend to vote for." That is particularly true given the "margin of error" separation between the two guys in almost every poll, regardless of who's on top or bottom.

We will indeed have people making the eminently rational choice to vote for Trump despite thinking Biden is a nicer guy.
While I don't disagree with this, you must surely realize that the same holds true for Biden. While there are a lot of Democrats and independents who don't approve of Biden, because they hate Trump with the passion of a thousand burning suns, they will make the choice to vote for Biden, despite thinking he's done a pretty crappy job as president.

When our only hope for getting our unlikable candidate elected is that the other candidate will be less likable, we are in pretty serious trouble.


Ever heard the saying, "Opinions are like a--holes. Everyone has one"?

Substitute polls for opinions, and it has essentially the same meaning.


For sure that could apply to every post on this forum.

The data is the data. It's can't really be dispositive when the numbers are so close, and in any event we can't read too much into it this far out in front of the election. But, and this is important......the data does not decisively support the arguments of the "can't win" caucus. It actually fits better the argument I've been making = the race is at this point competitive. We will have a better idea 9 months from now when we know exactly who will be the candidates and a better feel for what will be the 2-3 issues that will be most important to voters. Who knows, Biden may be gone and Harris may be President. Or Newsom may be on a coronation tour. If so, Kennedy may catch a 2nd wind.

Dems have a real dilemma on their hands if Biden doesn't make the ticket, for whatever reason. Harris is almost by acclamation the weakest of the visible options, yet they cannot skip over her without tearing a hole in their bucket. So it's not like they're supermen over on the other side. They can and do make mistakes, fail to fix their own problems.

As I've been saying, supporters of candidates other than Trump have got to find a better argument than electability. It's clearly not working. And it won't unless he's campaigning from jail. (which is the least likely of all options).
I think the last sentence of your post is far more likely than you're willing to admit, especially in GA and in the documents case.

You keep focusing on electability being a poor argument, while continuing to proffer an equally poor argument - banking on Biden being even less popular than Trump. When you run a very poor and disliked candidate and hope that his opponent will be even less likeable and unpopular, that is typically a recipe for disaster in an election. The fact is Trump has gotten even less popular than he was in 2019/2020, and Biden's approval numbers, while not great, are still better than Trump's (holding steady around 41% compared to Trump's 39%) - this despite Biden being a geriatric patient whose administration has been a total disaster. If Biden were to step down, and it becomes Newsom vs. Trump (the most likely of alternative scenarios, IMO), then Trump gets beaten in a landslide, IMO.

We already have 2020 as proof that Trump has an electability issue. The idea that his changes are improved in 2024 is simply not borne out by the evidence. We shouldn't ignore past mistakes in our analysis.
LOL that part in italics. Pointing out that BOTH candidates have electability issues is not adopting the electability argument. It's merely noting the fact there is no clear advantage on the question of electablity = 99% of public polling shows neither candidate ahead by a margin greater than the margin of error.

Holding assessments in reserve to determine future trends is not self-serving analysis. It is wise analysis. Biden is in office. He cannot just go to basement and let staffers critique the incumbent. HE is the incumbent. He will be held accountable to some degree for the good/bad that happens over the next 18 months. And it is hardly unreasonable to look at the landscape and assess that the odds of developments working against him are greater than the odds of developments working in his favor. 2020 was a referendum on Trump; 2024 will likely be a referendum on Biden. And Biden is an incredibly weak incumbent.

Admittedly, it will be an ugly contest.
Sure, I'd rather not have an ugly contest.
But we can't fret about what we'd like.
We have to figure out a way to win the contest we're gonna get.

And we can.
LOL at your denial. Come on, whiterock. You have been attacking the electability of Trump argument since the get go, while continually advocating Biden's approval and popularity decreasing.

Again, if job approval is any barometer (and it is), Biden has remained steady around 41% and Trump around 39% for more than a year. So, Trump is still coming up short in that area. And you also seem to want to discount that this is essentially a race between two incumbents. America has already rejected Trump once. So his track record in that area isn't good.

It's highly unlikely at this point Trump is going to increase in popularity, so the only hope is that Biden decreases. What remains true of both candidates, however, is that many of those who disapprove of the candidate will still vote for them over the alternative.

Is there a slim hope Trump can do something he's been unable to do since 2016? Sure. But there's not much hope based on the evidence.
I've attacked the electability argument because it has obvious flaws. That nearly 2/3rds of GOP voters don't buy it tends to ratify the assessment to that end I offered after the mid-terms. They didn't/don't buy it party because the polling at best hints at it, and mostly because they know it's not a static issue - that Biden is indeed likely to be weaker as time goes on, for a number of well-discussed reasons.

Popularity is an important issue, but it's not dispositive. People do vote for people they don't like.......because they don't like the other guy either, or like him a lot less. And to that end, the very likeability argument one could make against Trump applies also to Biden. Again, your entire case here is implicitly static.....that only Trump's likeability matters, that Biden's could not deteriorate below Trump's, etc.... My assessment would be different if Trump was running against someone beloved. But he's not. (at least yet).

We have a closely divided election. Not terribly many people are going to have to change their minds to win in 2024. Six digits or less, across a small handful of states. What Biden is doing to Trump in court could end up hurting Biden's likeability more than Trump's. There's evidence of it now. And Trump is not going to let that issue glide. See Oso's link above. Trump is going to pick up the turd and shove it in Biden's nose. So far, it's playing well.

Part of your problem is your polling numbers. I haven't seen the kind of stasis you noted. They've fluctuated a bit. (Biden support is at an all-time low at Rasmussen after being right at 50 only a few weeks ago.) But regardless.....a 2-point difference in likeability in a polling universe that has a 3-point margin of error and......well, that's like trying to hang my Cape Buffalo mount on a 16-penny nail. Not well supported. We do have some good candidates, though. I'll be a happy warrior for all of them except Hutchinson and Christie. I'll hold my nose and vote for those two as well, but I won't like it, just like I didn't like it when I had to vote for Romney. People do vote for people they don't like, from time to time, ya know.


Don't disagree with your last senates. Indeed, I have advocated voting for Trump if he's the nominee. Just like hundreds of thousands of Democrats will vote for Biden even though they don't like him
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/



Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




This is a sham poll. Among other things, it has Trump almost even among Blacks and dominating young voters. No other polls have had anything close to that.


Outlier for sure. Posted mostly because neither 538 nor CBS has ever been Trump friendly. And some here see 538 in particular as reputable. And I think they beat the RCP average in the midterms, IIRC. So we can't ash-can it. It has to sit on the table to review and force questions about what is going on.
I was not a fan of 538 in the early years, but now it is primarily a poll aggregator.

Unrelated to 538, 3 polls out showing Biden up on Trump 3-6 points. Two new Biden approval polls, 47 and 43. And generic ballot Dem 45 GOP 42. No bueno.
I think at this point we could find a poll to please anyone. All over the map......
Show me 2 actual pollsters that have Trump's approvals higher than Biden and I'll at least partially agree . . . .
There are several that not only have him ahead in support, but winning independents by a margin greater than the overall margin.

I'm not contesting that "approvals" matter, just noting that "approval rate" is not synonymous with "who do you intend to vote for." That is particularly true given the "margin of error" separation between the two guys in almost every poll, regardless of who's on top or bottom.

We will indeed have people making the eminently rational choice to vote for Trump despite thinking Biden is a nicer guy.
While I don't disagree with this, you must surely realize that the same holds true for Biden. While there are a lot of Democrats and independents who don't approve of Biden, because they hate Trump with the passion of a thousand burning suns, they will make the choice to vote for Biden, despite thinking he's done a pretty crappy job as president.

When our only hope for getting our unlikable candidate elected is that the other candidate will be less likable, we are in pretty serious trouble.


Ever heard the saying, "Opinions are like a--holes. Everyone has one"?

Substitute polls for opinions, and it has essentially the same meaning.


For sure that could apply to every post on this forum.

The data is the data. It's can't really be dispositive when the numbers are so close, and in any event we can't read too much into it this far out in front of the election. But, and this is important......the data does not decisively support the arguments of the "can't win" caucus. It actually fits better the argument I've been making = the race is at this point competitive. We will have a better idea 9 months from now when we know exactly who will be the candidates and a better feel for what will be the 2-3 issues that will be most important to voters. Who knows, Biden may be gone and Harris may be President. Or Newsom may be on a coronation tour. If so, Kennedy may catch a 2nd wind.

Dems have a real dilemma on their hands if Biden doesn't make the ticket, for whatever reason. Harris is almost by acclamation the weakest of the visible options, yet they cannot skip over her without tearing a hole in their bucket. So it's not like they're supermen over on the other side. They can and do make mistakes, fail to fix their own problems.

As I've been saying, supporters of candidates other than Trump have got to find a better argument than electability. It's clearly not working. And it won't unless he's campaigning from jail. (which is the least likely of all options).
I think the last sentence of your post is far more likely than you're willing to admit, especially in GA and in the documents case.

You keep focusing on electability being a poor argument, while continuing to proffer an equally poor argument - banking on Biden being even less popular than Trump. When you run a very poor and disliked candidate and hope that his opponent will be even less likeable and unpopular, that is typically a recipe for disaster in an election. The fact is Trump has gotten even less popular than he was in 2019/2020, and Biden's approval numbers, while not great, are still better than Trump's (holding steady around 41% compared to Trump's 39%) - this despite Biden being a geriatric patient whose administration has been a total disaster. If Biden were to step down, and it becomes Newsom vs. Trump (the most likely of alternative scenarios, IMO), then Trump gets beaten in a landslide, IMO.

We already have 2020 as proof that Trump has an electability issue. The idea that his changes are improved in 2024 is simply not borne out by the evidence. We shouldn't ignore past mistakes in our analysis.
LOL that part in italics. Pointing out that BOTH candidates have electability issues is not adopting the electability argument. It's merely noting the fact there is no clear advantage on the question of electablity = 99% of public polling shows neither candidate ahead by a margin greater than the margin of error.

Holding assessments in reserve to determine future trends is not self-serving analysis. It is wise analysis. Biden is in office. He cannot just go to basement and let staffers critique the incumbent. HE is the incumbent. He will be held accountable to some degree for the good/bad that happens over the next 18 months. And it is hardly unreasonable to look at the landscape and assess that the odds of developments working against him are greater than the odds of developments working in his favor. 2020 was a referendum on Trump; 2024 will likely be a referendum on Biden. And Biden is an incredibly weak incumbent.

Admittedly, it will be an ugly contest.
Sure, I'd rather not have an ugly contest.
But we can't fret about what we'd like.
We have to figure out a way to win the contest we're gonna get.

And we can.
LOL at your denial. Come on, whiterock. You have been attacking the electability of Trump argument since the get go, while continually advocating Biden's approval and popularity decreasing.

Again, if job approval is any barometer (and it is), Biden has remained steady around 41% and Trump around 39% for more than a year. So, Trump is still coming up short in that area. And you also seem to want to discount that this is essentially a race between two incumbents. America has already rejected Trump once. So his track record in that area isn't good.

It's highly unlikely at this point Trump is going to increase in popularity, so the only hope is that Biden decreases. What remains true of both candidates, however, is that many of those who disapprove of the candidate will still vote for them over the alternative.

Is there a slim hope Trump can do something he's been unable to do since 2016? Sure. But there's not much hope based on the evidence.
I've attacked the electability argument because it has obvious flaws. That nearly 2/3rds of GOP voters don't buy it tends to ratify the assessment to that end I offered after the mid-terms. They didn't/don't buy it party because the polling at best hints at it, and mostly because they know it's not a static issue - that Biden is indeed likely to be weaker as time goes on, for a number of well-discussed reasons.

Popularity is an important issue, but it's not dispositive. People do vote for people they don't like.......because they don't like the other guy either, or like him a lot less. And to that end, the very likeability argument one could make against Trump applies also to Biden. Again, your entire case here is implicitly static.....that only Trump's likeability matters, that Biden's could not deteriorate below Trump's, etc.... My assessment would be different if Trump was running against someone beloved. But he's not. (at least yet).

We have a closely divided election. Not terribly many people are going to have to change their minds to win in 2024. Six digits or less, across a small handful of states. What Biden is doing to Trump in court could end up hurting Biden's likeability more than Trump's. There's evidence of it now. And Trump is not going to let that issue glide. See Oso's link above. Trump is going to pick up the turd and shove it in Biden's nose. So far, it's playing well.

Part of your problem is your polling numbers. I haven't seen the kind of stasis you noted. They've fluctuated a bit. (Biden support is at an all-time low at Rasmussen after being right at 50 only a few weeks ago.) But regardless.....a 2-point difference in likeability in a polling universe that has a 3-point margin of error and......well, that's like trying to hang my Cape Buffalo mount on a 16-penny nail. Not well supported. We do have some good candidates, though. I'll be a happy warrior for all of them except Hutchinson and Christie. I'll hold my nose and vote for those two as well, but I won't like it, just like I didn't like it when I had to vote for Romney. People do vote for people they don't like, from time to time, ya know.


Don't disagree with your last senates. Indeed, I have advocated voting for Trump if he's the nominee. Just like hundreds of thousands of Democrats will vote for Biden even though they don't like him

Biden has a softer floor than Trump

Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

That's the 3rd or 4th poll I've posted with BOTH candidates in the low-40's. Classic set up for a very low turnout/base election. Tons of undecideds, most of whom will not vote or will vote 3rd party.


If/when Trump is the nominee, it will turn out the vote.

Wait and see.

Maybe. Maybe not.

https://www.newsmax.com/mclaughlin/biden-fulton-trump/2023/08/29/id/1132479/



Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




This is a sham poll. Among other things, it has Trump almost even among Blacks and dominating young voters. No other polls have had anything close to that.


Outlier for sure. Posted mostly because neither 538 nor CBS has ever been Trump friendly. And some here see 538 in particular as reputable. And I think they beat the RCP average in the midterms, IIRC. So we can't ash-can it. It has to sit on the table to review and force questions about what is going on.
I was not a fan of 538 in the early years, but now it is primarily a poll aggregator.

Unrelated to 538, 3 polls out showing Biden up on Trump 3-6 points. Two new Biden approval polls, 47 and 43. And generic ballot Dem 45 GOP 42. No bueno.
I think at this point we could find a poll to please anyone. All over the map......
Show me 2 actual pollsters that have Trump's approvals higher than Biden and I'll at least partially agree . . . .
There are several that not only have him ahead in support, but winning independents by a margin greater than the overall margin.

I'm not contesting that "approvals" matter, just noting that "approval rate" is not synonymous with "who do you intend to vote for." That is particularly true given the "margin of error" separation between the two guys in almost every poll, regardless of who's on top or bottom.

We will indeed have people making the eminently rational choice to vote for Trump despite thinking Biden is a nicer guy.
While I don't disagree with this, you must surely realize that the same holds true for Biden. While there are a lot of Democrats and independents who don't approve of Biden, because they hate Trump with the passion of a thousand burning suns, they will make the choice to vote for Biden, despite thinking he's done a pretty crappy job as president.

When our only hope for getting our unlikable candidate elected is that the other candidate will be less likable, we are in pretty serious trouble.


Ever heard the saying, "Opinions are like a--holes. Everyone has one"?

Substitute polls for opinions, and it has essentially the same meaning.


For sure that could apply to every post on this forum.

The data is the data. It's can't really be dispositive when the numbers are so close, and in any event we can't read too much into it this far out in front of the election. But, and this is important......the data does not decisively support the arguments of the "can't win" caucus. It actually fits better the argument I've been making = the race is at this point competitive. We will have a better idea 9 months from now when we know exactly who will be the candidates and a better feel for what will be the 2-3 issues that will be most important to voters. Who knows, Biden may be gone and Harris may be President. Or Newsom may be on a coronation tour. If so, Kennedy may catch a 2nd wind.

Dems have a real dilemma on their hands if Biden doesn't make the ticket, for whatever reason. Harris is almost by acclamation the weakest of the visible options, yet they cannot skip over her without tearing a hole in their bucket. So it's not like they're supermen over on the other side. They can and do make mistakes, fail to fix their own problems.

As I've been saying, supporters of candidates other than Trump have got to find a better argument than electability. It's clearly not working. And it won't unless he's campaigning from jail. (which is the least likely of all options).
I think the last sentence of your post is far more likely than you're willing to admit, especially in GA and in the documents case.

You keep focusing on electability being a poor argument, while continuing to proffer an equally poor argument - banking on Biden being even less popular than Trump. When you run a very poor and disliked candidate and hope that his opponent will be even less likeable and unpopular, that is typically a recipe for disaster in an election. The fact is Trump has gotten even less popular than he was in 2019/2020, and Biden's approval numbers, while not great, are still better than Trump's (holding steady around 41% compared to Trump's 39%) - this despite Biden being a geriatric patient whose administration has been a total disaster. If Biden were to step down, and it becomes Newsom vs. Trump (the most likely of alternative scenarios, IMO), then Trump gets beaten in a landslide, IMO.

We already have 2020 as proof that Trump has an electability issue. The idea that his changes are improved in 2024 is simply not borne out by the evidence. We shouldn't ignore past mistakes in our analysis.
LOL that part in italics. Pointing out that BOTH candidates have electability issues is not adopting the electability argument. It's merely noting the fact there is no clear advantage on the question of electablity = 99% of public polling shows neither candidate ahead by a margin greater than the margin of error.

Holding assessments in reserve to determine future trends is not self-serving analysis. It is wise analysis. Biden is in office. He cannot just go to basement and let staffers critique the incumbent. HE is the incumbent. He will be held accountable to some degree for the good/bad that happens over the next 18 months. And it is hardly unreasonable to look at the landscape and assess that the odds of developments working against him are greater than the odds of developments working in his favor. 2020 was a referendum on Trump; 2024 will likely be a referendum on Biden. And Biden is an incredibly weak incumbent.

Admittedly, it will be an ugly contest.
Sure, I'd rather not have an ugly contest.
But we can't fret about what we'd like.
We have to figure out a way to win the contest we're gonna get.

And we can.
LOL at your denial. Come on, whiterock. You have been attacking the electability of Trump argument since the get go, while continually advocating Biden's approval and popularity decreasing.

Again, if job approval is any barometer (and it is), Biden has remained steady around 41% and Trump around 39% for more than a year. So, Trump is still coming up short in that area. And you also seem to want to discount that this is essentially a race between two incumbents. America has already rejected Trump once. So his track record in that area isn't good.

It's highly unlikely at this point Trump is going to increase in popularity, so the only hope is that Biden decreases. What remains true of both candidates, however, is that many of those who disapprove of the candidate will still vote for them over the alternative.

Is there a slim hope Trump can do something he's been unable to do since 2016? Sure. But there's not much hope based on the evidence.
I've attacked the electability argument because it has obvious flaws. That nearly 2/3rds of GOP voters don't buy it tends to ratify the assessment to that end I offered after the mid-terms. They didn't/don't buy it party because the polling at best hints at it, and mostly because they know it's not a static issue - that Biden is indeed likely to be weaker as time goes on, for a number of well-discussed reasons.

Popularity is an important issue, but it's not dispositive. People do vote for people they don't like.......because they don't like the other guy either, or like him a lot less. And to that end, the very likeability argument one could make against Trump applies also to Biden. Again, your entire case here is implicitly static.....that only Trump's likeability matters, that Biden's could not deteriorate below Trump's, etc.... My assessment would be different if Trump was running against someone beloved. But he's not. (at least yet).

We have a closely divided election. Not terribly many people are going to have to change their minds to win in 2024. Six digits or less, across a small handful of states. What Biden is doing to Trump in court could end up hurting Biden's likeability more than Trump's. There's evidence of it now. And Trump is not going to let that issue glide. See Oso's link above. Trump is going to pick up the turd and shove it in Biden's nose. So far, it's playing well.

Part of your problem is your polling numbers. I haven't seen the kind of stasis you noted. They've fluctuated a bit. (Biden support is at an all-time low at Rasmussen after being right at 50 only a few weeks ago.) But regardless.....a 2-point difference in likeability in a polling universe that has a 3-point margin of error and......well, that's like trying to hang my Cape Buffalo mount on a 16-penny nail. Not well supported. We do have some good candidates, though. I'll be a happy warrior for all of them except Hutchinson and Christie. I'll hold my nose and vote for those two as well, but I won't like it, just like I didn't like it when I had to vote for Romney. People do vote for people they don't like, from time to time, ya know.


Don't disagree with your last senates. Indeed, I have advocated voting for Trump if he's the nominee. Just like hundreds of thousands of Democrats will vote for Biden even though they don't like him

Biden has a softer floor than Trump




Keep telling yourself that.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


The data is the data. It's can't really be dispositive when the numbers are so close, and in any event we can't read too much into it this far out in front of the election. But, and this is important......the data does not decisively support the arguments of the "can't win" caucus. It actually fits better the argument I've been making = the race is at this point competitive. We will have a better idea 9 months from now when we know exactly who will be the candidates and a better feel for what will be the 2-3 issues that will be most important to voters. Who knows, Biden may be gone and Harris may be President. Or Newsom may be on a coronation tour. If so, Kennedy may catch a 2nd wind.

Dems have a real dilemma on their hands if Biden doesn't make the ticket, for whatever reason. Harris is almost by acclamation the weakest of the visible options, yet they cannot skip over her without tearing a hole in their bucket. So it's not like they're supermen over on the other side. They can and do make mistakes, fail to fix their own problems.

As I've been saying, supporters of candidates other than Trump have got to find a better argument than electability. It's clearly not working. And it won't unless he's campaigning from jail. (which is the least likely of all options).
I think the last sentence of your post is far more likely than you're willing to admit, especially in GA and in the documents case.

You keep focusing on electability being a poor argument, while continuing to proffer an equally poor argument - banking on Biden being even less popular than Trump. When you run a very poor and disliked candidate and hope that his opponent will be even less likeable and unpopular, that is typically a recipe for disaster in an election. The fact is Trump has gotten even less popular than he was in 2019/2020, and Biden's approval numbers, while not great, are still better than Trump's (holding steady around 41% compared to Trump's 39%) - this despite Biden being a geriatric patient whose administration has been a total disaster. If Biden were to step down, and it becomes Newsom vs. Trump (the most likely of alternative scenarios, IMO), then Trump gets beaten in a landslide, IMO.

We already have 2020 as proof that Trump has an electability issue. The idea that his changes are improved in 2024 is simply not borne out by the evidence. We shouldn't ignore past mistakes in our analysis.
LOL that part in italics. Pointing out that BOTH candidates have electability issues is not adopting the electability argument. It's merely noting the fact there is no clear advantage on the question of electablity = 99% of public polling shows neither candidate ahead by a margin greater than the margin of error.

Holding assessments in reserve to determine future trends is not self-serving analysis. It is wise analysis. Biden is in office. He cannot just go to basement and let staffers critique the incumbent. HE is the incumbent. He will be held accountable to some degree for the good/bad that happens over the next 18 months. And it is hardly unreasonable to look at the landscape and assess that the odds of developments working against him are greater than the odds of developments working in his favor. 2020 was a referendum on Trump; 2024 will likely be a referendum on Biden. And Biden is an incredibly weak incumbent.

Admittedly, it will be an ugly contest.
Sure, I'd rather not have an ugly contest.
But we can't fret about what we'd like.
We have to figure out a way to win the contest we're gonna get.

And we can.
LOL at your denial. Come on, whiterock. You have been attacking the electability of Trump argument since the get go, while continually advocating Biden's approval and popularity decreasing.

Again, if job approval is any barometer (and it is), Biden has remained steady around 41% and Trump around 39% for more than a year. So, Trump is still coming up short in that area. And you also seem to want to discount that this is essentially a race between two incumbents. America has already rejected Trump once. So his track record in that area isn't good.

It's highly unlikely at this point Trump is going to increase in popularity, so the only hope is that Biden decreases. What remains true of both candidates, however, is that many of those who disapprove of the candidate will still vote for them over the alternative.

Is there a slim hope Trump can do something he's been unable to do since 2016? Sure. But there's not much hope based on the evidence.
I've attacked the electability argument because it has obvious flaws. That nearly 2/3rds of GOP voters don't buy it tends to ratify the assessment to that end I offered after the mid-terms. They didn't/don't buy it party because the polling at best hints at it, and mostly because they know it's not a static issue - that Biden is indeed likely to be weaker as time goes on, for a number of well-discussed reasons.

Popularity is an important issue, but it's not dispositive. People do vote for people they don't like.......because they don't like the other guy either, or like him a lot less. And to that end, the very likeability argument one could make against Trump applies also to Biden. Again, your entire case here is implicitly static.....that only Trump's likeability matters, that Biden's could not deteriorate below Trump's, etc.... My assessment would be different if Trump was running against someone beloved. But he's not. (at least yet).

We have a closely divided election. Not terribly many people are going to have to change their minds to win in 2024. Six digits or less, across a small handful of states. What Biden is doing to Trump in court could end up hurting Biden's likeability more than Trump's. There's evidence of it now. And Trump is not going to let that issue glide. See Oso's link above. Trump is going to pick up the turd and shove it in Biden's nose. So far, it's playing well.

Part of your problem is your polling numbers. I haven't seen the kind of stasis you noted. They've fluctuated a bit. (Biden support is at an all-time low at Rasmussen after being right at 50 only a few weeks ago.) But regardless.....a 2-point difference in likeability in a polling universe that has a 3-point margin of error and......well, that's like trying to hang my Cape Buffalo mount on a 16-penny nail. Not well supported. We do have some good candidates, though. I'll be a happy warrior for all of them except Hutchinson and Christie. I'll hold my nose and vote for those two as well, but I won't like it, just like I didn't like it when I had to vote for Romney. People do vote for people they don't like, from time to time, ya know.


Don't disagree with your last senates. Indeed, I have advocated voting for Trump if he's the nominee. Just like hundreds of thousands of Democrats will vote for Biden even though they don't like him

Biden has a softer floor than Trump




Keep telling yourself that.
The data is telling both of us that.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Mothra said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


The data is the data. It's can't really be dispositive when the numbers are so close, and in any event we can't read too much into it this far out in front of the election. But, and this is important......the data does not decisively support the arguments of the "can't win" caucus. It actually fits better the argument I've been making = the race is at this point competitive. We will have a better idea 9 months from now when we know exactly who will be the candidates and a better feel for what will be the 2-3 issues that will be most important to voters. Who knows, Biden may be gone and Harris may be President. Or Newsom may be on a coronation tour. If so, Kennedy may catch a 2nd wind.

Dems have a real dilemma on their hands if Biden doesn't make the ticket, for whatever reason. Harris is almost by acclamation the weakest of the visible options, yet they cannot skip over her without tearing a hole in their bucket. So it's not like they're supermen over on the other side. They can and do make mistakes, fail to fix their own problems.

As I've been saying, supporters of candidates other than Trump have got to find a better argument than electability. It's clearly not working. And it won't unless he's campaigning from jail. (which is the least likely of all options).
I think the last sentence of your post is far more likely than you're willing to admit, especially in GA and in the documents case.

You keep focusing on electability being a poor argument, while continuing to proffer an equally poor argument - banking on Biden being even less popular than Trump. When you run a very poor and disliked candidate and hope that his opponent will be even less likeable and unpopular, that is typically a recipe for disaster in an election. The fact is Trump has gotten even less popular than he was in 2019/2020, and Biden's approval numbers, while not great, are still better than Trump's (holding steady around 41% compared to Trump's 39%) - this despite Biden being a geriatric patient whose administration has been a total disaster. If Biden were to step down, and it becomes Newsom vs. Trump (the most likely of alternative scenarios, IMO), then Trump gets beaten in a landslide, IMO.

We already have 2020 as proof that Trump has an electability issue. The idea that his changes are improved in 2024 is simply not borne out by the evidence. We shouldn't ignore past mistakes in our analysis.
LOL that part in italics. Pointing out that BOTH candidates have electability issues is not adopting the electability argument. It's merely noting the fact there is no clear advantage on the question of electablity = 99% of public polling shows neither candidate ahead by a margin greater than the margin of error.

Holding assessments in reserve to determine future trends is not self-serving analysis. It is wise analysis. Biden is in office. He cannot just go to basement and let staffers critique the incumbent. HE is the incumbent. He will be held accountable to some degree for the good/bad that happens over the next 18 months. And it is hardly unreasonable to look at the landscape and assess that the odds of developments working against him are greater than the odds of developments working in his favor. 2020 was a referendum on Trump; 2024 will likely be a referendum on Biden. And Biden is an incredibly weak incumbent.

Admittedly, it will be an ugly contest.
Sure, I'd rather not have an ugly contest.
But we can't fret about what we'd like.
We have to figure out a way to win the contest we're gonna get.

And we can.
LOL at your denial. Come on, whiterock. You have been attacking the electability of Trump argument since the get go, while continually advocating Biden's approval and popularity decreasing.

Again, if job approval is any barometer (and it is), Biden has remained steady around 41% and Trump around 39% for more than a year. So, Trump is still coming up short in that area. And you also seem to want to discount that this is essentially a race between two incumbents. America has already rejected Trump once. So his track record in that area isn't good.

It's highly unlikely at this point Trump is going to increase in popularity, so the only hope is that Biden decreases. What remains true of both candidates, however, is that many of those who disapprove of the candidate will still vote for them over the alternative.

Is there a slim hope Trump can do something he's been unable to do since 2016? Sure. But there's not much hope based on the evidence.
I've attacked the electability argument because it has obvious flaws. That nearly 2/3rds of GOP voters don't buy it tends to ratify the assessment to that end I offered after the mid-terms. They didn't/don't buy it party because the polling at best hints at it, and mostly because they know it's not a static issue - that Biden is indeed likely to be weaker as time goes on, for a number of well-discussed reasons.

Popularity is an important issue, but it's not dispositive. People do vote for people they don't like.......because they don't like the other guy either, or like him a lot less. And to that end, the very likeability argument one could make against Trump applies also to Biden. Again, your entire case here is implicitly static.....that only Trump's likeability matters, that Biden's could not deteriorate below Trump's, etc.... My assessment would be different if Trump was running against someone beloved. But he's not. (at least yet).

We have a closely divided election. Not terribly many people are going to have to change their minds to win in 2024. Six digits or less, across a small handful of states. What Biden is doing to Trump in court could end up hurting Biden's likeability more than Trump's. There's evidence of it now. And Trump is not going to let that issue glide. See Oso's link above. Trump is going to pick up the turd and shove it in Biden's nose. So far, it's playing well.

Part of your problem is your polling numbers. I haven't seen the kind of stasis you noted. They've fluctuated a bit. (Biden support is at an all-time low at Rasmussen after being right at 50 only a few weeks ago.) But regardless.....a 2-point difference in likeability in a polling universe that has a 3-point margin of error and......well, that's like trying to hang my Cape Buffalo mount on a 16-penny nail. Not well supported. We do have some good candidates, though. I'll be a happy warrior for all of them except Hutchinson and Christie. I'll hold my nose and vote for those two as well, but I won't like it, just like I didn't like it when I had to vote for Romney. People do vote for people they don't like, from time to time, ya know.


Don't disagree with your last senates. Indeed, I have advocated voting for Trump if he's the nominee. Just like hundreds of thousands of Democrats will vote for Biden even though they don't like him

Biden has a softer floor than Trump




Keep telling yourself that.
The data is telling both of us that.


If it's Trump on the ticket, it will be another record turnout for the Dems.

Wait and see.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


The data is the data. It's can't really be dispositive when the numbers are so close, and in any event we can't read too much into it this far out in front of the election. But, and this is important......the data does not decisively support the arguments of the "can't win" caucus. It actually fits better the argument I've been making = the race is at this point competitive. We will have a better idea 9 months from now when we know exactly who will be the candidates and a better feel for what will be the 2-3 issues that will be most important to voters. Who knows, Biden may be gone and Harris may be President. Or Newsom may be on a coronation tour. If so, Kennedy may catch a 2nd wind.

Dems have a real dilemma on their hands if Biden doesn't make the ticket, for whatever reason. Harris is almost by acclamation the weakest of the visible options, yet they cannot skip over her without tearing a hole in their bucket. So it's not like they're supermen over on the other side. They can and do make mistakes, fail to fix their own problems.

As I've been saying, supporters of candidates other than Trump have got to find a better argument than electability. It's clearly not working. And it won't unless he's campaigning from jail. (which is the least likely of all options).
I think the last sentence of your post is far more likely than you're willing to admit, especially in GA and in the documents case.

You keep focusing on electability being a poor argument, while continuing to proffer an equally poor argument - banking on Biden being even less popular than Trump. When you run a very poor and disliked candidate and hope that his opponent will be even less likeable and unpopular, that is typically a recipe for disaster in an election. The fact is Trump has gotten even less popular than he was in 2019/2020, and Biden's approval numbers, while not great, are still better than Trump's (holding steady around 41% compared to Trump's 39%) - this despite Biden being a geriatric patient whose administration has been a total disaster. If Biden were to step down, and it becomes Newsom vs. Trump (the most likely of alternative scenarios, IMO), then Trump gets beaten in a landslide, IMO.

We already have 2020 as proof that Trump has an electability issue. The idea that his changes are improved in 2024 is simply not borne out by the evidence. We shouldn't ignore past mistakes in our analysis.
LOL that part in italics. Pointing out that BOTH candidates have electability issues is not adopting the electability argument. It's merely noting the fact there is no clear advantage on the question of electablity = 99% of public polling shows neither candidate ahead by a margin greater than the margin of error.

Holding assessments in reserve to determine future trends is not self-serving analysis. It is wise analysis. Biden is in office. He cannot just go to basement and let staffers critique the incumbent. HE is the incumbent. He will be held accountable to some degree for the good/bad that happens over the next 18 months. And it is hardly unreasonable to look at the landscape and assess that the odds of developments working against him are greater than the odds of developments working in his favor. 2020 was a referendum on Trump; 2024 will likely be a referendum on Biden. And Biden is an incredibly weak incumbent.

Admittedly, it will be an ugly contest.
Sure, I'd rather not have an ugly contest.
But we can't fret about what we'd like.
We have to figure out a way to win the contest we're gonna get.

And we can.
LOL at your denial. Come on, whiterock. You have been attacking the electability of Trump argument since the get go, while continually advocating Biden's approval and popularity decreasing.

Again, if job approval is any barometer (and it is), Biden has remained steady around 41% and Trump around 39% for more than a year. So, Trump is still coming up short in that area. And you also seem to want to discount that this is essentially a race between two incumbents. America has already rejected Trump once. So his track record in that area isn't good.

It's highly unlikely at this point Trump is going to increase in popularity, so the only hope is that Biden decreases. What remains true of both candidates, however, is that many of those who disapprove of the candidate will still vote for them over the alternative.

Is there a slim hope Trump can do something he's been unable to do since 2016? Sure. But there's not much hope based on the evidence.
I've attacked the electability argument because it has obvious flaws. That nearly 2/3rds of GOP voters don't buy it tends to ratify the assessment to that end I offered after the mid-terms. They didn't/don't buy it party because the polling at best hints at it, and mostly because they know it's not a static issue - that Biden is indeed likely to be weaker as time goes on, for a number of well-discussed reasons.

Popularity is an important issue, but it's not dispositive. People do vote for people they don't like.......because they don't like the other guy either, or like him a lot less. And to that end, the very likeability argument one could make against Trump applies also to Biden. Again, your entire case here is implicitly static.....that only Trump's likeability matters, that Biden's could not deteriorate below Trump's, etc.... My assessment would be different if Trump was running against someone beloved. But he's not. (at least yet).

We have a closely divided election. Not terribly many people are going to have to change their minds to win in 2024. Six digits or less, across a small handful of states. What Biden is doing to Trump in court could end up hurting Biden's likeability more than Trump's. There's evidence of it now. And Trump is not going to let that issue glide. See Oso's link above. Trump is going to pick up the turd and shove it in Biden's nose. So far, it's playing well.

Part of your problem is your polling numbers. I haven't seen the kind of stasis you noted. They've fluctuated a bit. (Biden support is at an all-time low at Rasmussen after being right at 50 only a few weeks ago.) But regardless.....a 2-point difference in likeability in a polling universe that has a 3-point margin of error and......well, that's like trying to hang my Cape Buffalo mount on a 16-penny nail. Not well supported. We do have some good candidates, though. I'll be a happy warrior for all of them except Hutchinson and Christie. I'll hold my nose and vote for those two as well, but I won't like it, just like I didn't like it when I had to vote for Romney. People do vote for people they don't like, from time to time, ya know.


Don't disagree with your last senates. Indeed, I have advocated voting for Trump if he's the nominee. Just like hundreds of thousands of Democrats will vote for Biden even though they don't like him

Biden has a softer floor than Trump




Keep telling yourself that.
The data is telling both of us that.


If it's Trump on the ticket, it will be another record turnout for the Dems.

Wait and see
They'll get a record number of votes, not sure if they'll have record turnout.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


The data is the data. It's can't really be dispositive when the numbers are so close, and in any event we can't read too much into it this far out in front of the election. But, and this is important......the data does not decisively support the arguments of the "can't win" caucus. It actually fits better the argument I've been making = the race is at this point competitive. We will have a better idea 9 months from now when we know exactly who will be the candidates and a better feel for what will be the 2-3 issues that will be most important to voters. Who knows, Biden may be gone and Harris may be President. Or Newsom may be on a coronation tour. If so, Kennedy may catch a 2nd wind.

Dems have a real dilemma on their hands if Biden doesn't make the ticket, for whatever reason. Harris is almost by acclamation the weakest of the visible options, yet they cannot skip over her without tearing a hole in their bucket. So it's not like they're supermen over on the other side. They can and do make mistakes, fail to fix their own problems.

As I've been saying, supporters of candidates other than Trump have got to find a better argument than electability. It's clearly not working. And it won't unless he's campaigning from jail. (which is the least likely of all options).
I think the last sentence of your post is far more likely than you're willing to admit, especially in GA and in the documents case.

You keep focusing on electability being a poor argument, while continuing to proffer an equally poor argument - banking on Biden being even less popular than Trump. When you run a very poor and disliked candidate and hope that his opponent will be even less likeable and unpopular, that is typically a recipe for disaster in an election. The fact is Trump has gotten even less popular than he was in 2019/2020, and Biden's approval numbers, while not great, are still better than Trump's (holding steady around 41% compared to Trump's 39%) - this despite Biden being a geriatric patient whose administration has been a total disaster. If Biden were to step down, and it becomes Newsom vs. Trump (the most likely of alternative scenarios, IMO), then Trump gets beaten in a landslide, IMO.

We already have 2020 as proof that Trump has an electability issue. The idea that his changes are improved in 2024 is simply not borne out by the evidence. We shouldn't ignore past mistakes in our analysis.
LOL that part in italics. Pointing out that BOTH candidates have electability issues is not adopting the electability argument. It's merely noting the fact there is no clear advantage on the question of electablity = 99% of public polling shows neither candidate ahead by a margin greater than the margin of error.

Holding assessments in reserve to determine future trends is not self-serving analysis. It is wise analysis. Biden is in office. He cannot just go to basement and let staffers critique the incumbent. HE is the incumbent. He will be held accountable to some degree for the good/bad that happens over the next 18 months. And it is hardly unreasonable to look at the landscape and assess that the odds of developments working against him are greater than the odds of developments working in his favor. 2020 was a referendum on Trump; 2024 will likely be a referendum on Biden. And Biden is an incredibly weak incumbent.

Admittedly, it will be an ugly contest.
Sure, I'd rather not have an ugly contest.
But we can't fret about what we'd like.
We have to figure out a way to win the contest we're gonna get.

And we can.
LOL at your denial. Come on, whiterock. You have been attacking the electability of Trump argument since the get go, while continually advocating Biden's approval and popularity decreasing.

Again, if job approval is any barometer (and it is), Biden has remained steady around 41% and Trump around 39% for more than a year. So, Trump is still coming up short in that area. And you also seem to want to discount that this is essentially a race between two incumbents. America has already rejected Trump once. So his track record in that area isn't good.

It's highly unlikely at this point Trump is going to increase in popularity, so the only hope is that Biden decreases. What remains true of both candidates, however, is that many of those who disapprove of the candidate will still vote for them over the alternative.

Is there a slim hope Trump can do something he's been unable to do since 2016? Sure. But there's not much hope based on the evidence.
I've attacked the electability argument because it has obvious flaws. That nearly 2/3rds of GOP voters don't buy it tends to ratify the assessment to that end I offered after the mid-terms. They didn't/don't buy it party because the polling at best hints at it, and mostly because they know it's not a static issue - that Biden is indeed likely to be weaker as time goes on, for a number of well-discussed reasons.

Popularity is an important issue, but it's not dispositive. People do vote for people they don't like.......because they don't like the other guy either, or like him a lot less. And to that end, the very likeability argument one could make against Trump applies also to Biden. Again, your entire case here is implicitly static.....that only Trump's likeability matters, that Biden's could not deteriorate below Trump's, etc.... My assessment would be different if Trump was running against someone beloved. But he's not. (at least yet).

We have a closely divided election. Not terribly many people are going to have to change their minds to win in 2024. Six digits or less, across a small handful of states. What Biden is doing to Trump in court could end up hurting Biden's likeability more than Trump's. There's evidence of it now. And Trump is not going to let that issue glide. See Oso's link above. Trump is going to pick up the turd and shove it in Biden's nose. So far, it's playing well.

Part of your problem is your polling numbers. I haven't seen the kind of stasis you noted. They've fluctuated a bit. (Biden support is at an all-time low at Rasmussen after being right at 50 only a few weeks ago.) But regardless.....a 2-point difference in likeability in a polling universe that has a 3-point margin of error and......well, that's like trying to hang my Cape Buffalo mount on a 16-penny nail. Not well supported. We do have some good candidates, though. I'll be a happy warrior for all of them except Hutchinson and Christie. I'll hold my nose and vote for those two as well, but I won't like it, just like I didn't like it when I had to vote for Romney. People do vote for people they don't like, from time to time, ya know.


Don't disagree with your last senates. Indeed, I have advocated voting for Trump if he's the nominee. Just like hundreds of thousands of Democrats will vote for Biden even though they don't like him

Biden has a softer floor than Trump




Keep telling yourself that.
The data is telling both of us that.


If it's Trump on the ticket, it will be another record turnout for the Dems.

Wait and see
They'll get a record number of votes, not sure if they'll have record turnout.

You have your eye on the ball, sir!

whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WSJ showing a dead even race.

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What 2nd rate acting class did this fake Stone Cold Austin Fed go to ?

Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Trump Says He'd Have 'No Choice' But to Lock Up Political Opponents if He Wins in 2024


Former president Donald Trump recently said he'd have "no choice" but to lock up his political opponents if he wins the 2024 presidential race because his opponents are already doing the same to him and his allies.

Trump's comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Tuesday.

Beck noted that Trump led chants of "lock her up" about Hillary Clinton in 2016. "And then when you became president, you said, 'We don't do that in America. That's just not the right thing to do,'" Beck said. "That's what they're doing. Do you regret not locking her up? And if you're president again, will you lock people up?"

"Well, I'll give you an example," Trump said. "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us."

"I always had such great respect for the office of the president and the presidency," he added. "And I never hit Biden as hard as I could have. And then I heard he was trying to indict me and it was him that was doing it."

While Trump suggested Biden was the driving force behind "every one of" the four indictments he's facing, he said: "I don't think he's sharp enough to think about much, but he was there, and he was probably the one giving the order."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-says-hed-have-no-choice-but-to-lock-up-political-opponents-if-he-wins-in-2024/






Trump had a chance in 2016 to go down the road the Dems are taking now. And he didn't. And how did they pay him back? By literally making stuff up to indict him over. He's got every right to punch back, and voters understand that. His supporters love it and it will not hurt him in the middle like you want it to.




Several problems with your argument:

1) It's not made up. Trump committed the actions he's been accused of. Now whether those actions are criminal is the issue. But he did them and there's no dispute on that. So it's not accurate to say it's all made up.

2) Voters don't understand. His sycophants might but they comprise a small segment of the voting bloc. Everyone else sees him as a loose cannon.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Rawhide said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


The data is the data. It's can't really be dispositive when the numbers are so close, and in any event we can't read too much into it this far out in front of the election. But, and this is important......the data does not decisively support the arguments of the "can't win" caucus. It actually fits better the argument I've been making = the race is at this point competitive. We will have a better idea 9 months from now when we know exactly who will be the candidates and a better feel for what will be the 2-3 issues that will be most important to voters. Who knows, Biden may be gone and Harris may be President. Or Newsom may be on a coronation tour. If so, Kennedy may catch a 2nd wind.

Dems have a real dilemma on their hands if Biden doesn't make the ticket, for whatever reason. Harris is almost by acclamation the weakest of the visible options, yet they cannot skip over her without tearing a hole in their bucket. So it's not like they're supermen over on the other side. They can and do make mistakes, fail to fix their own problems.

As I've been saying, supporters of candidates other than Trump have got to find a better argument than electability. It's clearly not working. And it won't unless he's campaigning from jail. (which is the least likely of all options).
I think the last sentence of your post is far more likely than you're willing to admit, especially in GA and in the documents case.

You keep focusing on electability being a poor argument, while continuing to proffer an equally poor argument - banking on Biden being even less popular than Trump. When you run a very poor and disliked candidate and hope that his opponent will be even less likeable and unpopular, that is typically a recipe for disaster in an election. The fact is Trump has gotten even less popular than he was in 2019/2020, and Biden's approval numbers, while not great, are still better than Trump's (holding steady around 41% compared to Trump's 39%) - this despite Biden being a geriatric patient whose administration has been a total disaster. If Biden were to step down, and it becomes Newsom vs. Trump (the most likely of alternative scenarios, IMO), then Trump gets beaten in a landslide, IMO.

We already have 2020 as proof that Trump has an electability issue. The idea that his changes are improved in 2024 is simply not borne out by the evidence. We shouldn't ignore past mistakes in our analysis.
LOL that part in italics. Pointing out that BOTH candidates have electability issues is not adopting the electability argument. It's merely noting the fact there is no clear advantage on the question of electablity = 99% of public polling shows neither candidate ahead by a margin greater than the margin of error.

Holding assessments in reserve to determine future trends is not self-serving analysis. It is wise analysis. Biden is in office. He cannot just go to basement and let staffers critique the incumbent. HE is the incumbent. He will be held accountable to some degree for the good/bad that happens over the next 18 months. And it is hardly unreasonable to look at the landscape and assess that the odds of developments working against him are greater than the odds of developments working in his favor. 2020 was a referendum on Trump; 2024 will likely be a referendum on Biden. And Biden is an incredibly weak incumbent.

Admittedly, it will be an ugly contest.
Sure, I'd rather not have an ugly contest.
But we can't fret about what we'd like.
We have to figure out a way to win the contest we're gonna get.

And we can.
LOL at your denial. Come on, whiterock. You have been attacking the electability of Trump argument since the get go, while continually advocating Biden's approval and popularity decreasing.

Again, if job approval is any barometer (and it is), Biden has remained steady around 41% and Trump around 39% for more than a year. So, Trump is still coming up short in that area. And you also seem to want to discount that this is essentially a race between two incumbents. America has already rejected Trump once. So his track record in that area isn't good.

It's highly unlikely at this point Trump is going to increase in popularity, so the only hope is that Biden decreases. What remains true of both candidates, however, is that many of those who disapprove of the candidate will still vote for them over the alternative.

Is there a slim hope Trump can do something he's been unable to do since 2016? Sure. But there's not much hope based on the evidence.
I've attacked the electability argument because it has obvious flaws. That nearly 2/3rds of GOP voters don't buy it tends to ratify the assessment to that end I offered after the mid-terms. They didn't/don't buy it party because the polling at best hints at it, and mostly because they know it's not a static issue - that Biden is indeed likely to be weaker as time goes on, for a number of well-discussed reasons.

Popularity is an important issue, but it's not dispositive. People do vote for people they don't like.......because they don't like the other guy either, or like him a lot less. And to that end, the very likeability argument one could make against Trump applies also to Biden. Again, your entire case here is implicitly static.....that only Trump's likeability matters, that Biden's could not deteriorate below Trump's, etc.... My assessment would be different if Trump was running against someone beloved. But he's not. (at least yet).

We have a closely divided election. Not terribly many people are going to have to change their minds to win in 2024. Six digits or less, across a small handful of states. What Biden is doing to Trump in court could end up hurting Biden's likeability more than Trump's. There's evidence of it now. And Trump is not going to let that issue glide. See Oso's link above. Trump is going to pick up the turd and shove it in Biden's nose. So far, it's playing well.

Part of your problem is your polling numbers. I haven't seen the kind of stasis you noted. They've fluctuated a bit. (Biden support is at an all-time low at Rasmussen after being right at 50 only a few weeks ago.) But regardless.....a 2-point difference in likeability in a polling universe that has a 3-point margin of error and......well, that's like trying to hang my Cape Buffalo mount on a 16-penny nail. Not well supported. We do have some good candidates, though. I'll be a happy warrior for all of them except Hutchinson and Christie. I'll hold my nose and vote for those two as well, but I won't like it, just like I didn't like it when I had to vote for Romney. People do vote for people they don't like, from time to time, ya know.


Don't disagree with your last senates. Indeed, I have advocated voting for Trump if he's the nominee. Just like hundreds of thousands of Democrats will vote for Biden even though they don't like him

Biden has a softer floor than Trump




Keep telling yourself that.
The data is telling both of us that.


If it's Trump on the ticket, it will be another record turnout for the Dems.

Wait and see
They'll get a record number of votes, not sure if they'll have record turnout.

You have your eye on the ball, sir!




Once again, problem with your little theory is the other guy's approval rating is even worse at 39%.

But you keep that optimistic outlook!
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Trump Says He'd Have 'No Choice' But to Lock Up Political Opponents if He Wins in 2024


Former president Donald Trump recently said he'd have "no choice" but to lock up his political opponents if he wins the 2024 presidential race because his opponents are already doing the same to him and his allies.

Trump's comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Tuesday.

Beck noted that Trump led chants of "lock her up" about Hillary Clinton in 2016. "And then when you became president, you said, 'We don't do that in America. That's just not the right thing to do,'" Beck said. "That's what they're doing. Do you regret not locking her up? And if you're president again, will you lock people up?"

"Well, I'll give you an example," Trump said. "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us."

"I always had such great respect for the office of the president and the presidency," he added. "And I never hit Biden as hard as I could have. And then I heard he was trying to indict me and it was him that was doing it."

While Trump suggested Biden was the driving force behind "every one of" the four indictments he's facing, he said: "I don't think he's sharp enough to think about much, but he was there, and he was probably the one giving the order."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-says-hed-have-no-choice-but-to-lock-up-political-opponents-if-he-wins-in-2024/






Trump had a chance in 2016 to go down the road the Dems are taking now. And he didn't. And how did they pay him back? By literally making stuff up to indict him over. He's got every right to punch back, and voters understand that. His supporters love it and it will not hurt him in the middle like you want it to.




Several problems with your argument:

1) It's not made up. Trump committed the actions he's been accused of. Now whether those actions are criminal is the issue. But he did them and there's no dispute on that. So it's not accurate to say it's all made up.

2) Voters don't understand. His sycophants might but they comprise a small segment of the voting bloc. Everyone else sees him as a loose cannon.
The made up part is that anything he has done is criminal.

You are somewhat closer on item 2. I would rephrase it like this: "a strong majority of Republicans as well as an emerging and growing majority of independents believe it may be time to put a loose cannon to work."
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Rawhide said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


The data is the data. It's can't really be dispositive when the numbers are so close, and in any event we can't read too much into it this far out in front of the election. But, and this is important......the data does not decisively support the arguments of the "can't win" caucus. It actually fits better the argument I've been making = the race is at this point competitive. We will have a better idea 9 months from now when we know exactly who will be the candidates and a better feel for what will be the 2-3 issues that will be most important to voters. Who knows, Biden may be gone and Harris may be President. Or Newsom may be on a coronation tour. If so, Kennedy may catch a 2nd wind.

Dems have a real dilemma on their hands if Biden doesn't make the ticket, for whatever reason. Harris is almost by acclamation the weakest of the visible options, yet they cannot skip over her without tearing a hole in their bucket. So it's not like they're supermen over on the other side. They can and do make mistakes, fail to fix their own problems.

As I've been saying, supporters of candidates other than Trump have got to find a better argument than electability. It's clearly not working. And it won't unless he's campaigning from jail. (which is the least likely of all options).
I think the last sentence of your post is far more likely than you're willing to admit, especially in GA and in the documents case.

You keep focusing on electability being a poor argument, while continuing to proffer an equally poor argument - banking on Biden being even less popular than Trump. When you run a very poor and disliked candidate and hope that his opponent will be even less likeable and unpopular, that is typically a recipe for disaster in an election. The fact is Trump has gotten even less popular than he was in 2019/2020, and Biden's approval numbers, while not great, are still better than Trump's (holding steady around 41% compared to Trump's 39%) - this despite Biden being a geriatric patient whose administration has been a total disaster. If Biden were to step down, and it becomes Newsom vs. Trump (the most likely of alternative scenarios, IMO), then Trump gets beaten in a landslide, IMO.

We already have 2020 as proof that Trump has an electability issue. The idea that his changes are improved in 2024 is simply not borne out by the evidence. We shouldn't ignore past mistakes in our analysis.
LOL that part in italics. Pointing out that BOTH candidates have electability issues is not adopting the electability argument. It's merely noting the fact there is no clear advantage on the question of electablity = 99% of public polling shows neither candidate ahead by a margin greater than the margin of error.

Holding assessments in reserve to determine future trends is not self-serving analysis. It is wise analysis. Biden is in office. He cannot just go to basement and let staffers critique the incumbent. HE is the incumbent. He will be held accountable to some degree for the good/bad that happens over the next 18 months. And it is hardly unreasonable to look at the landscape and assess that the odds of developments working against him are greater than the odds of developments working in his favor. 2020 was a referendum on Trump; 2024 will likely be a referendum on Biden. And Biden is an incredibly weak incumbent.

Admittedly, it will be an ugly contest.
Sure, I'd rather not have an ugly contest.
But we can't fret about what we'd like.
We have to figure out a way to win the contest we're gonna get.

And we can.
LOL at your denial. Come on, whiterock. You have been attacking the electability of Trump argument since the get go, while continually advocating Biden's approval and popularity decreasing.

Again, if job approval is any barometer (and it is), Biden has remained steady around 41% and Trump around 39% for more than a year. So, Trump is still coming up short in that area. And you also seem to want to discount that this is essentially a race between two incumbents. America has already rejected Trump once. So his track record in that area isn't good.

It's highly unlikely at this point Trump is going to increase in popularity, so the only hope is that Biden decreases. What remains true of both candidates, however, is that many of those who disapprove of the candidate will still vote for them over the alternative.

Is there a slim hope Trump can do something he's been unable to do since 2016? Sure. But there's not much hope based on the evidence.
I've attacked the electability argument because it has obvious flaws. That nearly 2/3rds of GOP voters don't buy it tends to ratify the assessment to that end I offered after the mid-terms. They didn't/don't buy it party because the polling at best hints at it, and mostly because they know it's not a static issue - that Biden is indeed likely to be weaker as time goes on, for a number of well-discussed reasons.

Popularity is an important issue, but it's not dispositive. People do vote for people they don't like.......because they don't like the other guy either, or like him a lot less. And to that end, the very likeability argument one could make against Trump applies also to Biden. Again, your entire case here is implicitly static.....that only Trump's likeability matters, that Biden's could not deteriorate below Trump's, etc.... My assessment would be different if Trump was running against someone beloved. But he's not. (at least yet).

We have a closely divided election. Not terribly many people are going to have to change their minds to win in 2024. Six digits or less, across a small handful of states. What Biden is doing to Trump in court could end up hurting Biden's likeability more than Trump's. There's evidence of it now. And Trump is not going to let that issue glide. See Oso's link above. Trump is going to pick up the turd and shove it in Biden's nose. So far, it's playing well.

Part of your problem is your polling numbers. I haven't seen the kind of stasis you noted. They've fluctuated a bit. (Biden support is at an all-time low at Rasmussen after being right at 50 only a few weeks ago.) But regardless.....a 2-point difference in likeability in a polling universe that has a 3-point margin of error and......well, that's like trying to hang my Cape Buffalo mount on a 16-penny nail. Not well supported. We do have some good candidates, though. I'll be a happy warrior for all of them except Hutchinson and Christie. I'll hold my nose and vote for those two as well, but I won't like it, just like I didn't like it when I had to vote for Romney. People do vote for people they don't like, from time to time, ya know.


Don't disagree with your last senates. Indeed, I have advocated voting for Trump if he's the nominee. Just like hundreds of thousands of Democrats will vote for Biden even though they don't like him

Biden has a softer floor than Trump




Keep telling yourself that.
The data is telling both of us that.


If it's Trump on the ticket, it will be another record turnout for the Dems.

Wait and see
They'll get a record number of votes, not sure if they'll have record turnout.

You have your eye on the ball, sir!




Once again, problem with your little theory is the other guy's approval rating is even worse at 39%.

But you keep that optimistic outlook!
Again, 1% difference in a poll with a 3% margin of error is not remarkable, except to demonstrate the race is competitive. It is certainly not dispositive either way on where the race will be in 15 months.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Trump Says He'd Have 'No Choice' But to Lock Up Political Opponents if He Wins in 2024


Former president Donald Trump recently said he'd have "no choice" but to lock up his political opponents if he wins the 2024 presidential race because his opponents are already doing the same to him and his allies.

Trump's comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Tuesday.

Beck noted that Trump led chants of "lock her up" about Hillary Clinton in 2016. "And then when you became president, you said, 'We don't do that in America. That's just not the right thing to do,'" Beck said. "That's what they're doing. Do you regret not locking her up? And if you're president again, will you lock people up?"

"Well, I'll give you an example," Trump said. "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us."

"I always had such great respect for the office of the president and the presidency," he added. "And I never hit Biden as hard as I could have. And then I heard he was trying to indict me and it was him that was doing it."

While Trump suggested Biden was the driving force behind "every one of" the four indictments he's facing, he said: "I don't think he's sharp enough to think about much, but he was there, and he was probably the one giving the order."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-says-hed-have-no-choice-but-to-lock-up-political-opponents-if-he-wins-in-2024/






Trump had a chance in 2016 to go down the road the Dems are taking now. And he didn't. And how did they pay him back? By literally making stuff up to indict him over. He's got every right to punch back, and voters understand that. His supporters love it and it will not hurt him in the middle like you want it to.




Several problems with your argument:

1) It's not made up. Trump committed the actions he's been accused of. Now whether those actions are criminal is the issue. But he did them and there's no dispute on that. So it's not accurate to say it's all made up.

2) Voters don't understand. His sycophants might but they comprise a small segment of the voting bloc. Everyone else sees him as a loose cannon.
The made up part is that anything he has done is criminal.

You are somewhat closer on item 2. I would rephrase it like this: "a strong majority of Republicans as well as an emerging and growing majority of independents believe it may be time to put a loose cannon to work."


60% of registered GOP voters and a very small number of independents is more accurate.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Trump Says He'd Have 'No Choice' But to Lock Up Political Opponents if He Wins in 2024


Former president Donald Trump recently said he'd have "no choice" but to lock up his political opponents if he wins the 2024 presidential race because his opponents are already doing the same to him and his allies.

Trump's comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Tuesday.

Beck noted that Trump led chants of "lock her up" about Hillary Clinton in 2016. "And then when you became president, you said, 'We don't do that in America. That's just not the right thing to do,'" Beck said. "That's what they're doing. Do you regret not locking her up? And if you're president again, will you lock people up?"

"Well, I'll give you an example," Trump said. "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us."

"I always had such great respect for the office of the president and the presidency," he added. "And I never hit Biden as hard as I could have. And then I heard he was trying to indict me and it was him that was doing it."

While Trump suggested Biden was the driving force behind "every one of" the four indictments he's facing, he said: "I don't think he's sharp enough to think about much, but he was there, and he was probably the one giving the order."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-says-hed-have-no-choice-but-to-lock-up-political-opponents-if-he-wins-in-2024/






Trump had a chance in 2016 to go down the road the Dems are taking now. And he didn't. And how did they pay him back? By literally making stuff up to indict him over. He's got every right to punch back, and voters understand that. His supporters love it and it will not hurt him in the middle like you want it to.




Several problems with your argument:

1) It's not made up. Trump committed the actions he's been accused of. Now whether those actions are criminal is the issue. But he did them and there's no dispute on that. So it's not accurate to say it's all made up.

2) Voters don't understand. His sycophants might but they comprise a small segment of the voting bloc. Everyone else sees him as a loose cannon.
The made up part is that anything he has done is criminal.

You are somewhat closer on item 2. I would rephrase it like this: "a strong majority of Republicans as well as an emerging and growing majority of independents believe it may be time to put a loose cannon to work."


60% of registered GOP voters and a very small number of independents is more accurate.

I've posted several recent links of reputable polling firms showing exactly what I stated. Apparently, you've got a poll you like and are running with it.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Trump Says He'd Have 'No Choice' But to Lock Up Political Opponents if He Wins in 2024


Former president Donald Trump recently said he'd have "no choice" but to lock up his political opponents if he wins the 2024 presidential race because his opponents are already doing the same to him and his allies.

Trump's comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Tuesday.

Beck noted that Trump led chants of "lock her up" about Hillary Clinton in 2016. "And then when you became president, you said, 'We don't do that in America. That's just not the right thing to do,'" Beck said. "That's what they're doing. Do you regret not locking her up? And if you're president again, will you lock people up?"

"Well, I'll give you an example," Trump said. "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us."

"I always had such great respect for the office of the president and the presidency," he added. "And I never hit Biden as hard as I could have. And then I heard he was trying to indict me and it was him that was doing it."

While Trump suggested Biden was the driving force behind "every one of" the four indictments he's facing, he said: "I don't think he's sharp enough to think about much, but he was there, and he was probably the one giving the order."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-says-hed-have-no-choice-but-to-lock-up-political-opponents-if-he-wins-in-2024/






Trump had a chance in 2016 to go down the road the Dems are taking now. And he didn't. And how did they pay him back? By literally making stuff up to indict him over. He's got every right to punch back, and voters understand that. His supporters love it and it will not hurt him in the middle like you want it to.




Several problems with your argument:

1) It's not made up. Trump committed the actions he's been accused of. Now whether those actions are criminal is the issue. But he did them and there's no dispute on that. So it's not accurate to say it's all made up.

2) Voters don't understand. His sycophants might but they comprise a small segment of the voting bloc. Everyone else sees him as a loose cannon.
The made up part is that anything he has done is criminal.

You are somewhat closer on item 2. I would rephrase it like this: "a strong majority of Republicans as well as an emerging and growing majority of independents believe it may be time to put a loose cannon to work."


60% of registered GOP voters and a very small number of independents is more accurate.

I've posted several recent links of reputable polling firms showing exactly what I stated. Apparently, you've got a poll you like and are running with it.
Maybe he is referring to the WSJ survey that included all registered voters, not just GOP.

The Republican peril is that more than one-and-a-half times as many voters say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump than more likely. This reflects the tilt of independent voters, as well as the 16% of GOP voters who say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump.

The GOP's Big 2024 Problem
A WSJ poll finds indictments are helping Trump in the Republican primaries, but not with all voters.
The latest Wall Street Journal poll is getting headlines for its news that support for Donald Trump nationwide is now up to 59% in the GOP primary race. But for our money the most important harbinger for 2024 is contained in the responses to another survey question.
The poll finds that in a 2024 general-election test President Biden and the former President are tied at 46%. Given Mr. Trump's myriad legal problems, this shows how weak an incumbent Mr. Biden is. But a poll this far out from Election Day also doesn't tell you much given how events can change.
The better insight comes when respondents were asked: "Do Donald Trump's indictments make you more likely or less likely to vote for him, or have no impact on whether or not you would vote for Donald Trump?"
Among Republican primary voters, here are the responses: More likely to vote for Mr. Trump 48%; less likely 16%, and no effect on their vote 36%.
That result confirms what we've seen this year, which is that the indictments by Democratic prosecutors are helping Mr. Trump win the GOP's presidential nod. The biggest jump in Mr. Trump's support came after the first indictment for hush-money payments by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg, and the other indictments changed that very little. This is exactly the result that Democrats want: Keep the focus on Mr. Trump so he wins the nomination, and then convict him in trials before the general election in November.
That strategy is reinforced by the responses when the WSJ survey asked registered voters the same question about the indictments. Their responses: 24% were more likely to vote for Mr. Trump, but 37% were less likely, and 35% said it would have no effect.
The Republican peril is that more than one-and-a-half times as many voters say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump than more likely. This reflects the tilt of independent voters, as well as the 16% of GOP voters who say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump.
These responses are before any of the coming four trials, three of which are already scheduled before the 2024 general election. An acquittal or hung jury could work in Mr. Trump's favor, which is why the Democratic indictment strategy is high risk.
But one or more convictions would probably confirm the judgment of voters who say they are less likely to vote for Mr. Trump. If Republicans nominate Mr. Trump, they are likely to be sailing into a political headwind that will be difficult to overcome.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-gops-big-2024-problem-wsj-polling-indictments-e3c52288?mod=opinion_lead_pos1
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Trump Says He'd Have 'No Choice' But to Lock Up Political Opponents if He Wins in 2024


Former president Donald Trump recently said he'd have "no choice" but to lock up his political opponents if he wins the 2024 presidential race because his opponents are already doing the same to him and his allies.

Trump's comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Tuesday.

Beck noted that Trump led chants of "lock her up" about Hillary Clinton in 2016. "And then when you became president, you said, 'We don't do that in America. That's just not the right thing to do,'" Beck said. "That's what they're doing. Do you regret not locking her up? And if you're president again, will you lock people up?"

"Well, I'll give you an example," Trump said. "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us."

"I always had such great respect for the office of the president and the presidency," he added. "And I never hit Biden as hard as I could have. And then I heard he was trying to indict me and it was him that was doing it."

While Trump suggested Biden was the driving force behind "every one of" the four indictments he's facing, he said: "I don't think he's sharp enough to think about much, but he was there, and he was probably the one giving the order."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-says-hed-have-no-choice-but-to-lock-up-political-opponents-if-he-wins-in-2024/






Trump had a chance in 2016 to go down the road the Dems are taking now. And he didn't. And how did they pay him back? By literally making stuff up to indict him over. He's got every right to punch back, and voters understand that. His supporters love it and it will not hurt him in the middle like you want it to.




Several problems with your argument:

1) It's not made up. Trump committed the actions he's been accused of. Now whether those actions are criminal is the issue. But he did them and there's no dispute on that. So it's not accurate to say it's all made up.

2) Voters don't understand. His sycophants might but they comprise a small segment of the voting bloc. Everyone else sees him as a loose cannon.
The made up part is that anything he has done is criminal.

You are somewhat closer on item 2. I would rephrase it like this: "a strong majority of Republicans as well as an emerging and growing majority of independents believe it may be time to put a loose cannon to work."


60% of registered GOP voters and a very small number of independents is more accurate.

I've posted several recent links of reputable polling firms showing exactly what I stated. Apparently, you've got a poll you like and are running with it.
Maybe he is referring to the WSJ survey that included all registered voters, not just GOP.

The Republican peril is that more than one-and-a-half times as many voters say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump than more likely. This reflects the tilt of independent voters, as well as the 16% of GOP voters who say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump.

The GOP's Big 2024 Problem
A WSJ poll finds indictments are helping Trump in the Republican primaries, but not with all voters.
The latest Wall Street Journal poll is getting headlines for its news that support for Donald Trump nationwide is now up to 59% in the GOP primary race. But for our money the most important harbinger for 2024 is contained in the responses to another survey question.
The poll finds that in a 2024 general-election test President Biden and the former President are tied at 46%. Given Mr. Trump's myriad legal problems, this shows how weak an incumbent Mr. Biden is. But a poll this far out from Election Day also doesn't tell you much given how events can change.
The better insight comes when respondents were asked: "Do Donald Trump's indictments make you more likely or less likely to vote for him, or have no impact on whether or not you would vote for Donald Trump?"
Among Republican primary voters, here are the responses: More likely to vote for Mr. Trump 48%; less likely 16%, and no effect on their vote 36%.
That result confirms what we've seen this year, which is that the indictments by Democratic prosecutors are helping Mr. Trump win the GOP's presidential nod. The biggest jump in Mr. Trump's support came after the first indictment for hush-money payments by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg, and the other indictments changed that very little. This is exactly the result that Democrats want: Keep the focus on Mr. Trump so he wins the nomination, and then convict him in trials before the general election in November.
That strategy is reinforced by the responses when the WSJ survey asked registered voters the same question about the indictments. Their responses: 24% were more likely to vote for Mr. Trump, but 37% were less likely, and 35% said it would have no effect.
The Republican peril is that more than one-and-a-half times as many voters say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump than more likely. This reflects the tilt of independent voters, as well as the 16% of GOP voters who say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump.
These responses are before any of the coming four trials, three of which are already scheduled before the 2024 general election. An acquittal or hung jury could work in Mr. Trump's favor, which is why the Democratic indictment strategy is high risk.
But one or more convictions would probably confirm the judgment of voters who say they are less likely to vote for Mr. Trump. If Republicans nominate Mr. Trump, they are likely to be sailing into a political headwind that will be difficult to overcome.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-gops-big-2024-problem-wsj-polling-indictments-e3c52288?mod=opinion_lead_pos1


He's referring to pure polling on independents. I've seen and/or posted here several polls that show Trump ahead with independents. Notably, those polls did not show much movement in the overall race = neck & neck. That's mostly because defining what is/isn't an independent this far away from an election is very difficult to to do.

Note that I do not take it further than "inconclusive," unlike others who impute a 1-point advantage to be determinative in a poll with a 3-point margin of error. The race is close right now and likely will be down to the wire.

What you've posted is an entirely different issue and even more subjective.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Trump Says He'd Have 'No Choice' But to Lock Up Political Opponents if He Wins in 2024


Former president Donald Trump recently said he'd have "no choice" but to lock up his political opponents if he wins the 2024 presidential race because his opponents are already doing the same to him and his allies.

Trump's comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Tuesday.

Beck noted that Trump led chants of "lock her up" about Hillary Clinton in 2016. "And then when you became president, you said, 'We don't do that in America. That's just not the right thing to do,'" Beck said. "That's what they're doing. Do you regret not locking her up? And if you're president again, will you lock people up?"

"Well, I'll give you an example," Trump said. "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us."

"I always had such great respect for the office of the president and the presidency," he added. "And I never hit Biden as hard as I could have. And then I heard he was trying to indict me and it was him that was doing it."

While Trump suggested Biden was the driving force behind "every one of" the four indictments he's facing, he said: "I don't think he's sharp enough to think about much, but he was there, and he was probably the one giving the order."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-says-hed-have-no-choice-but-to-lock-up-political-opponents-if-he-wins-in-2024/






Trump had a chance in 2016 to go down the road the Dems are taking now. And he didn't. And how did they pay him back? By literally making stuff up to indict him over. He's got every right to punch back, and voters understand that. His supporters love it and it will not hurt him in the middle like you want it to.




Several problems with your argument:

1) It's not made up. Trump committed the actions he's been accused of. Now whether those actions are criminal is the issue. But he did them and there's no dispute on that. So it's not accurate to say it's all made up.

2) Voters don't understand. His sycophants might but they comprise a small segment of the voting bloc. Everyone else sees him as a loose cannon.
The made up part is that anything he has done is criminal.

You are somewhat closer on item 2. I would rephrase it like this: "a strong majority of Republicans as well as an emerging and growing majority of independents believe it may be time to put a loose cannon to work."


60% of registered GOP voters and a very small number of independents is more accurate.

I've posted several recent links of reputable polling firms showing exactly what I stated. Apparently, you've got a poll you like and are running with it.
Maybe he is referring to the WSJ survey that included all registered voters, not just GOP.

The Republican peril is that more than one-and-a-half times as many voters say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump than more likely. This reflects the tilt of independent voters, as well as the 16% of GOP voters who say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump.

The GOP's Big 2024 Problem
A WSJ poll finds indictments are helping Trump in the Republican primaries, but not with all voters.
The latest Wall Street Journal poll is getting headlines for its news that support for Donald Trump nationwide is now up to 59% in the GOP primary race. But for our money the most important harbinger for 2024 is contained in the responses to another survey question.
The poll finds that in a 2024 general-election test President Biden and the former President are tied at 46%. Given Mr. Trump's myriad legal problems, this shows how weak an incumbent Mr. Biden is. But a poll this far out from Election Day also doesn't tell you much given how events can change.
The better insight comes when respondents were asked: "Do Donald Trump's indictments make you more likely or less likely to vote for him, or have no impact on whether or not you would vote for Donald Trump?"
Among Republican primary voters, here are the responses: More likely to vote for Mr. Trump 48%; less likely 16%, and no effect on their vote 36%.
That result confirms what we've seen this year, which is that the indictments by Democratic prosecutors are helping Mr. Trump win the GOP's presidential nod. The biggest jump in Mr. Trump's support came after the first indictment for hush-money payments by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg, and the other indictments changed that very little. This is exactly the result that Democrats want: Keep the focus on Mr. Trump so he wins the nomination, and then convict him in trials before the general election in November.
That strategy is reinforced by the responses when the WSJ survey asked registered voters the same question about the indictments. Their responses: 24% were more likely to vote for Mr. Trump, but 37% were less likely, and 35% said it would have no effect.
The Republican peril is that more than one-and-a-half times as many voters say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump than more likely. This reflects the tilt of independent voters, as well as the 16% of GOP voters who say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump.
These responses are before any of the coming four trials, three of which are already scheduled before the 2024 general election. An acquittal or hung jury could work in Mr. Trump's favor, which is why the Democratic indictment strategy is high risk.
But one or more convictions would probably confirm the judgment of voters who say they are less likely to vote for Mr. Trump. If Republicans nominate Mr. Trump, they are likely to be sailing into a political headwind that will be difficult to overcome.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-gops-big-2024-problem-wsj-polling-indictments-e3c52288?mod=opinion_lead_pos1


He's referring to pure polling on independents. I've seen and/or posted here several polls that show Trump ahead with independents. Notably, those polls did not show much movement in the overall race = neck & neck. That's mostly because defining what is/isn't an independent this far away from an election is very difficult to to do.

Note that I do not take it further than "inconclusive," unlike others who impute a 1-point advantage to be determinative in a poll with a 3-point margin of error. The race is close right now and likely will be down to the wire.

What you've posted is an entirely different issue and even more subjective.


It won't go down to the wire. Trump is going to lose worse than last time.

Wait and see.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Mothra said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Trump Says He'd Have 'No Choice' But to Lock Up Political Opponents if He Wins in 2024


Former president Donald Trump recently said he'd have "no choice" but to lock up his political opponents if he wins the 2024 presidential race because his opponents are already doing the same to him and his allies.

Trump's comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Glenn Beck on Tuesday.

Beck noted that Trump led chants of "lock her up" about Hillary Clinton in 2016. "And then when you became president, you said, 'We don't do that in America. That's just not the right thing to do,'" Beck said. "That's what they're doing. Do you regret not locking her up? And if you're president again, will you lock people up?"

"Well, I'll give you an example," Trump said. "The answer is you have no choice because they're doing it to us."

"I always had such great respect for the office of the president and the presidency," he added. "And I never hit Biden as hard as I could have. And then I heard he was trying to indict me and it was him that was doing it."

While Trump suggested Biden was the driving force behind "every one of" the four indictments he's facing, he said: "I don't think he's sharp enough to think about much, but he was there, and he was probably the one giving the order."

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/trump-says-hed-have-no-choice-but-to-lock-up-political-opponents-if-he-wins-in-2024/






Trump had a chance in 2016 to go down the road the Dems are taking now. And he didn't. And how did they pay him back? By literally making stuff up to indict him over. He's got every right to punch back, and voters understand that. His supporters love it and it will not hurt him in the middle like you want it to.




Several problems with your argument:

1) It's not made up. Trump committed the actions he's been accused of. Now whether those actions are criminal is the issue. But he did them and there's no dispute on that. So it's not accurate to say it's all made up.

2) Voters don't understand. His sycophants might but they comprise a small segment of the voting bloc. Everyone else sees him as a loose cannon.
The made up part is that anything he has done is criminal.

You are somewhat closer on item 2. I would rephrase it like this: "a strong majority of Republicans as well as an emerging and growing majority of independents believe it may be time to put a loose cannon to work."


60% of registered GOP voters and a very small number of independents is more accurate.

I've posted several recent links of reputable polling firms showing exactly what I stated. Apparently, you've got a poll you like and are running with it.
Maybe he is referring to the WSJ survey that included all registered voters, not just GOP.

The Republican peril is that more than one-and-a-half times as many voters say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump than more likely. This reflects the tilt of independent voters, as well as the 16% of GOP voters who say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump.

The GOP's Big 2024 Problem
A WSJ poll finds indictments are helping Trump in the Republican primaries, but not with all voters.
The latest Wall Street Journal poll is getting headlines for its news that support for Donald Trump nationwide is now up to 59% in the GOP primary race. But for our money the most important harbinger for 2024 is contained in the responses to another survey question.
The poll finds that in a 2024 general-election test President Biden and the former President are tied at 46%. Given Mr. Trump's myriad legal problems, this shows how weak an incumbent Mr. Biden is. But a poll this far out from Election Day also doesn't tell you much given how events can change.
The better insight comes when respondents were asked: "Do Donald Trump's indictments make you more likely or less likely to vote for him, or have no impact on whether or not you would vote for Donald Trump?"
Among Republican primary voters, here are the responses: More likely to vote for Mr. Trump 48%; less likely 16%, and no effect on their vote 36%.
That result confirms what we've seen this year, which is that the indictments by Democratic prosecutors are helping Mr. Trump win the GOP's presidential nod. The biggest jump in Mr. Trump's support came after the first indictment for hush-money payments by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg, and the other indictments changed that very little. This is exactly the result that Democrats want: Keep the focus on Mr. Trump so he wins the nomination, and then convict him in trials before the general election in November.
That strategy is reinforced by the responses when the WSJ survey asked registered voters the same question about the indictments. Their responses: 24% were more likely to vote for Mr. Trump, but 37% were less likely, and 35% said it would have no effect.
The Republican peril is that more than one-and-a-half times as many voters say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump than more likely. This reflects the tilt of independent voters, as well as the 16% of GOP voters who say the indictments make them less likely to vote for Mr. Trump.
These responses are before any of the coming four trials, three of which are already scheduled before the 2024 general election. An acquittal or hung jury could work in Mr. Trump's favor, which is why the Democratic indictment strategy is high risk.
But one or more convictions would probably confirm the judgment of voters who say they are less likely to vote for Mr. Trump. If Republicans nominate Mr. Trump, they are likely to be sailing into a political headwind that will be difficult to overcome.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-gops-big-2024-problem-wsj-polling-indictments-e3c52288?mod=opinion_lead_pos1

let me know when you got LV polls.. internals are usually useful as well
Adopt-a-Bear 2024

#90 COOPER LANZ ( DL )
CLASS Junior
HT/WT 6' 3", 288 lbs


#50 KAIAN ROBERTS-DAY ( DL )
CLASS Sophomore
HT/WT 6' 3", 273 lbs
First Page Last Page
Page 39 of 304
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.