KaiBear said:
No matter how one arranges the details of this election process.
Trump is going to lose.
One way or another.
Dems didn't raid his house, invent damages of hundreds of millions of dollars , and alter state laws to find a 'crime'……
just to play nice in November when it matters most.
And 90% of the media will dare the American people to do anything about it.
What happens on July 11th will be a signal. If Trump is imprisoned in Riker's Island or placed under house arrest that will tell us where they are going to go by the end of the year.
As far as the margin of fraud goes, historically it's been around 3%. That's back in the day when the Democrats would routinely go to courts to have polls in specific democrat districts to stay open late, that sort of thing. In a world where they can junk mail ballots, harvest them, and put them in anonymous drop boxes to be counted we just don't know what that margin of fraud is. It's almost certainly more than 3%. If you look at the Whitmer-Dixon election in Michigan, the polls were basically calling a dead heat in an election that Whitmer "won" by 10 points. That may be a signal of where things stand today.
Also, keep an eye on the War in Ukraine. Having NATO military forces directly attacking Russians will likely spark a nuclear detonation. That - and a variety of other disturbances - opens the door to martial law before the November election. This could lead to anything from the "delay" of the election until the crisis is over all the way up to closing polls in unfavorable jurisdictions to arresting republicans.
"Further,
martial law suspends all existing laws, as well as civil authority and the ordinary administration of justice. In the United States, martial law may be declared by proclamation of the President or a State governor, but such a formal proclamation is not necessary. Although the U.S. Constitution makes no specific provision for the imposition of martial law, nearly every State has a constitutional provision authorizing the government to impose martial law. The power of martial law, once held to be nearly absolute, has limitations; for example, civilians may not be tried by military tribunals as long as civilian courts are functional [note that proviso: when Hawaii was under martial law following Pearl Harbor, American Citizens were being tried and imprisoned for civil matters by military tribunals. So they can close the courts if they wish].
Nonetheless, within the bounds of court decisions, a military commander's authority under martial law is virtually unlimited."What won't they do? They are trying to put the front runner in the presidential race in prison for the rest of his life for things that aren't crimes. It answers its own question. They will do anything, and I would expect that to continue. I really do think the formality of these elections is irksome to them. The whole idea that people they despise have a role in choosing the government, or have any power whatsoever, or be disobedient in any way. So they hate elections. The defenders of democracy hate democracy, and so they will go very very far in eliminating it.- Tucker Carlson
