Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.

Yes they’re calling for invalidating the election if it doesn’t go their way

But DON’T YOU DARE, EVER suggest that they might cheat in elections https://t.co/HDdLIvNYXB

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) August 6, 2024

---

Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results

---

He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.

Clip of Raskin threatening to use force to fight “Trump mobs” on Jan 6, 2025 to remove Trump under insurrection clause is 💯 real.

Here is another clip from same event where Raskin denounced SCOTUS for pending CO insurrection decision and blames court for likely civil war.

Sick pic.twitter.com/2PMWV5I2Mb

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2024

---

Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters

---

The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Kamala Harris has gained on Donald Trump in 9 of 10 key battleground states since Joe Biden dropped out of the race, per Decision Desk HQ/@thehill poll averages. pic.twitter.com/L6VD5WAWFV

— Decision Desk HQ (@DecisionDeskHQ) August 5, 2024

---

a lot of catterwalling and handwringing.....but those movements are all within margin of error. (and that's before we get to the issue of media polling to make rather than report news.

The fundamentals of the race not only have not changed, they have deteriorated, as yesterday's stock market indicates.

---

Data is only an indicator, saying that trend is within the Margin of Error does not make the trend less valid.

Trump is in a good position, only if Trump STOPS with the unforced errors. He is his own worst enemy. This is a General Election, he has his base. His base is not going to win him the election, only getting him in striking distance. He needs those Independents and Moderates, since the Vance selection he seems to have forgotten that.

His team appears to have started making some adjustments, that is promising. Three things I have noticed...

1 - They are starting to roll out Vance's wife more than Vance, which is good. She is more articulate and has a story that resonates with the needed voters. She needs more time in the media.

2 - Supposedly, he is going to be airing more Ads documenting policy and the economy.

3 - They are interviewing Trump, not letting him just rail, the interview where he actually complements, AOC on having a "spark", "knowing who she is" and "being effective" actually played well it was on all the news stations this morning and they didn't know how to deal with it because he complemented her.

Those are the things that help him in the middle and left. He needs to stay away from angry Trump...

---

correct. a trend is till a trend. But if it's in the MOE, you have to watch the numbers over time to confirm that it's a trend and not chatter.

Making an odd off-message statement here & there is not nearly as big of a hurdle as the bad fundamentals facing the Democrats. So let the "here we go again" stuff about Trump roll off your back. He's not the problem. the Democrats are the problem.

You and I won't see much of a campaign, living in red states like we do. The money will be spent in swing states, mostly Great Lakes states. That said, I am seeing Kamala ads while my wife is watching the Olympics. That's a little bit of a grift by the PACs....spending money in states which will not be competitive. Some of that can be explained away as indirect support for Allred. But mostly it's a need to spend money before the election is over. There's an election every 2 years, but the campaigns rarely last much longer than 6 months. Consultants have to get 2 years of expenses & profits crammed into that 6 month period........

The amount of money each campaign has is ample given the small number of swing states involved.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.

Yes they’re calling for invalidating the election if it doesn’t go their way

But DON’T YOU DARE, EVER suggest that they might cheat in elections https://t.co/HDdLIvNYXB

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) August 6, 2024

---

Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results

---

He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.

Clip of Raskin threatening to use force to fight “Trump mobs” on Jan 6, 2025 to remove Trump under insurrection clause is 💯 real.

Here is another clip from same event where Raskin denounced SCOTUS for pending CO insurrection decision and blames court for likely civil war.

Sick pic.twitter.com/2PMWV5I2Mb

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2024

---

Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters

---

The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.

---

I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

historian said:

---

It's only more principled to vote for the Dem if one is a Leftist / commie / fascist who wants to see America decline further. I've never heard that position described as patriotic or loyal. It's amazing how far done people will go because of TDS.

---

Well, the poster in question has admitted on these boards he actually funded and voted for Democrat candidates in Texas in 2022 due to Republicans' support of Trump, one of whom wanted universal access to abortions on the govt. dime.

I mean, when you're so motivated by your hatred of a candidate that you would financially support candidates who support such evil and heinous policy, you've lost the right to call anyone else unprincipled.

---

Not true. Name the Democrat in Texas I sent money

---

If you say so. I recall you saying you were giving money to the Dems Cheney supported. Perhaps they were not Texas Dems, or perhaps you ultimately decided against it. I guess, you simply voted for them, including a pro-abortion on demand candidate.

---

Weak
You got nothing
Understandable

---

And yet, you've failed to refute anything I've said.

1) Do you deny you said you were financially supporting the candidates Liz Cheney threw her support behind?

2) Do you deny you said you voted for the Democrat AG candidate?

3) Do you deny you said you voted for the Democrat RR Commissioner?

---

I gave money to Republican Liz Cheney. Never financially supported any Democrat, unlike you who admit s supporting Democrat

Did not vote for Dem RR Commissioner, but did vote against crooked Ken Paxton

You voted for Dems Why can't others do the same?

You are a pragmatic voter & that pragmatism is more important to you than principle

---

So you deny you said you were financially supporting the candidates Liz Cheney threw her support behind? Yes or no?

What other Dems did you vote for the last election cycle?

I never said you can't vote for Dems. As always, it depends on the position. As I tried to explain to you previously (apparently to no avail), if it's a local, apolitical position (in this case a county tax assessor), I don't see an issue with voting for a Dem who is a friend. As I also tried to explain, the Dem party has changed quite a bit since I last voted for one.

State and national elections are a whole different ball of wax. I am not surprised you fail to understand the difference. You're a dim bulb.

whiterock said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Kamala Harris has gained on Donald Trump in 9 of 10 key battleground states since Joe Biden dropped out of the race, per Decision Desk HQ/@thehill poll averages. pic.twitter.com/L6VD5WAWFV

— Decision Desk HQ (@DecisionDeskHQ) August 5, 2024

---

a lot of catterwalling and handwringing.....but those movements are all within margin of error. (and that's before we get to the issue of media polling to make rather than report news.

The fundamentals of the race not only have not changed, they have deteriorated, as yesterday's stock market indicates.

---

Data is only an indicator, saying that trend is within the Margin of Error does not make the trend less valid.

Trump is in a good position, only if Trump STOPS with the unforced errors. He is his own worst enemy. This is a General Election, he has his base. His base is not going to win him the election, only getting him in striking distance. He needs those Independents and Moderates, since the Vance selection he seems to have forgotten that.

His team appears to have started making some adjustments, that is promising. Three things I have noticed...

1 - They are starting to roll out Vance's wife more than Vance, which is good. She is more articulate and has a story that resonates with the needed voters. She needs more time in the media.

2 - Supposedly, he is going to be airing more Ads documenting policy and the economy.

3 - They are interviewing Trump, not letting him just rail, the interview where he actually complements, AOC on having a "spark", "knowing who she is" and "being effective" actually played well it was on all the news stations this morning and they didn't know how to deal with it because he complemented her.

Those are the things that help him in the middle and left. He needs to stay away from angry Trump...

---

correct. a trend is till a trend. But if it's in the MOE, you have to watch the numbers over time to confirm that it's a trend and not chatter.

Making an odd off-message statement here & there is not nearly as big of a hurdle as the bad fundamentals facing the Democrats. So let the "here we go again" stuff about Trump roll off your back. He's not the problem. the Democrats are the problem.

You and I won't see much of a campaign, living in red states like we do. The money will be spent in swing states, mostly Great Lakes states. That said, I am seeing Kamala ads while my wife is watching the Olympics. That's a little bit of a grift by the PACs....spending money in states which will not be competitive. Some of that can be explained away as indirect support for Allred. But mostly it's a need to spend money before the election is over. There's an election every 2 years, but the campaigns rarely last much longer than 6 months. Consultants have to get 2 years of expenses & profits crammed into that 6 month period........

The amount of money each campaign has is ample given the small number of swing states involved.

---

Dems are killing Trump in Wisconsin. Was just there, billboards of Trump and Epstein saying "Remember"... A lot of "Women Against Trump" bumper stickers. This was in the Ag area, not the Cities. Those Ag areas remember Trump, not in a good way. My in-laws are farmers.

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.

Yes they’re calling for invalidating the election if it doesn’t go their way

But DON’T YOU DARE, EVER suggest that they might cheat in elections https://t.co/HDdLIvNYXB

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) August 6, 2024

---

Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results

---

He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.

Clip of Raskin threatening to use force to fight “Trump mobs” on Jan 6, 2025 to remove Trump under insurrection clause is 💯 real.

Here is another clip from same event where Raskin denounced SCOTUS for pending CO insurrection decision and blames court for likely civil war.

Sick pic.twitter.com/2PMWV5I2Mb

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2024

---

Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters

---

The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.

---

I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?

---

Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

historian said:

---

It's only more principled to vote for the Dem if one is a Leftist / commie / fascist who wants to see America decline further. I've never heard that position described as patriotic or loyal. It's amazing how far done people will go because of TDS.

---

Well, the poster in question has admitted on these boards he actually funded and voted for Democrat candidates in Texas in 2022 due to Republicans' support of Trump, one of whom wanted universal access to abortions on the govt. dime.

I mean, when you're so motivated by your hatred of a candidate that you would financially support candidates who support such evil and heinous policy, you've lost the right to call anyone else unprincipled.

---

Not true. Name the Democrat in Texas I sent money

---

If you say so. I recall you saying you were giving money to the Dems Cheney supported. Perhaps they were not Texas Dems, or perhaps you ultimately decided against it. I guess, you simply voted for them, including a pro-abortion on demand candidate.

---

Weak
You got nothing
Understandable

---

And yet, you've failed to refute anything I've said.

1) Do you deny you said you were financially supporting the candidates Liz Cheney threw her support behind?

2) Do you deny you said you voted for the Democrat AG candidate?

3) Do you deny you said you voted for the Democrat RR Commissioner?

---

I gave money to Republican Liz Cheney. Never financially supported any Democrat, unlike you who admit s supporting Democrat

Did not vote for Dem RR Commissioner, but did vote against crooked Ken Paxton

You voted for Dems Why can't others do the same?

You are a pragmatic voter & that pragmatism is more important to you than principle

---

So you deny you said you were financially supporting the candidates Liz Cheney threw her support behind? Yes or no?

What other Dems did you vote for the last election cycle?

I never said you can't vote for Dems. As always, it depends on the position. As I tried to explain to you previously (apparently to no avail), if it's a local, apolitical position (in this case a county tax assessor), I don't see an issue with voting for a Dem who is a friend. As I also tried to explain, the Dem party has changed quite a bit since I last voted for one.

State and national elections are a whole different ball of wax. I am not surprised you fail to understand the difference. You're a dim bulb.

---

I have no problem with your voting for a Democrat. My problem is your judgement and flexible principles

I've never financially supported a Democrat Liz recommended
You admit voting for crooked Ken? Very flexible principles

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.

Yes they’re calling for invalidating the election if it doesn’t go their way

But DON’T YOU DARE, EVER suggest that they might cheat in elections https://t.co/HDdLIvNYXB

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) August 6, 2024

---

Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results

---

He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.

Clip of Raskin threatening to use force to fight “Trump mobs” on Jan 6, 2025 to remove Trump under insurrection clause is 💯 real.

Here is another clip from same event where Raskin denounced SCOTUS for pending CO insurrection decision and blames court for likely civil war.

Sick pic.twitter.com/2PMWV5I2Mb

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2024

---

Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters

---

The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.

---

I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?

---

Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.

---

I watched the video. I'll defend election results whichever way it goes. Will you?

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.

Yes they’re calling for invalidating the election if it doesn’t go their way

But DON’T YOU DARE, EVER suggest that they might cheat in elections https://t.co/HDdLIvNYXB

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) August 6, 2024

---

Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results

---

He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.

Clip of Raskin threatening to use force to fight “Trump mobs” on Jan 6, 2025 to remove Trump under insurrection clause is 💯 real.

Here is another clip from same event where Raskin denounced SCOTUS for pending CO insurrection decision and blames court for likely civil war.

Sick pic.twitter.com/2PMWV5I2Mb

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2024

---

Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters

---

The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.

---

I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?

---

Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.

---

I watched the video. I'll defend election results whichever way it goes. Will you?

---

Sure. If there's mishaps like in 2020, will you say that our election process needs to be fixed?

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

historian said:

---

It's only more principled to vote for the Dem if one is a Leftist / commie / fascist who wants to see America decline further. I've never heard that position described as patriotic or loyal. It's amazing how far done people will go because of TDS.

---

Well, the poster in question has admitted on these boards he actually funded and voted for Democrat candidates in Texas in 2022 due to Republicans' support of Trump, one of whom wanted universal access to abortions on the govt. dime.

I mean, when you're so motivated by your hatred of a candidate that you would financially support candidates who support such evil and heinous policy, you've lost the right to call anyone else unprincipled.

---

Not true. Name the Democrat in Texas I sent money

---

If you say so. I recall you saying you were giving money to the Dems Cheney supported. Perhaps they were not Texas Dems, or perhaps you ultimately decided against it. I guess, you simply voted for them, including a pro-abortion on demand candidate.

---

Weak
You got nothing
Understandable

---

And yet, you've failed to refute anything I've said.

1) Do you deny you said you were financially supporting the candidates Liz Cheney threw her support behind?

2) Do you deny you said you voted for the Democrat AG candidate?

3) Do you deny you said you voted for the Democrat RR Commissioner?

---

I gave money to Republican Liz Cheney. Never financially supported any Democrat, unlike you who admit s supporting Democrat

Did not vote for Dem RR Commissioner, but did vote against crooked Ken Paxton

You voted for Dems Why can't others do the same?

You are a pragmatic voter & that pragmatism is more important to you than principle

---

So you deny you said you were financially supporting the candidates Liz Cheney threw her support behind? Yes or no?

What other Dems did you vote for the last election cycle?

I never said you can't vote for Dems. As always, it depends on the position. As I tried to explain to you previously (apparently to no avail), if it's a local, apolitical position (in this case a county tax assessor), I don't see an issue with voting for a Dem who is a friend. As I also tried to explain, the Dem party has changed quite a bit since I last voted for one.

State and national elections are a whole different ball of wax. I am not surprised you fail to understand the difference. You're a dim bulb.

---

I have no problem with your voting for a Democrat. My problem is your judgement and flexible principles

I've never financially supported a Democrat Liz recommended
You admit voting for crooked Ken? Very flexible principles

---

Which specific principles have I compromised on? Please name them specifically.

So you have supported a Democrat financially. Which ones?

Of course I voted for Ken Paxton over the pro-abortion on demand candidate that wanted federally funded abortions you voted for. No conservative would have voted otherwise.

But there's your flexible principles again.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.

Yes they’re calling for invalidating the election if it doesn’t go their way

But DON’T YOU DARE, EVER suggest that they might cheat in elections https://t.co/HDdLIvNYXB

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) August 6, 2024

---

Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results

---

He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.

Clip of Raskin threatening to use force to fight “Trump mobs” on Jan 6, 2025 to remove Trump under insurrection clause is 💯 real.

Here is another clip from same event where Raskin denounced SCOTUS for pending CO insurrection decision and blames court for likely civil war.

Sick pic.twitter.com/2PMWV5I2Mb

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2024

---

Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters

---

The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.

---

I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?

---

Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.

---

I watched the video. I'll defend election results whichever way it goes. Will you?

---

Sure. If there's mishaps like in 2020, will you say that our election process needs to be fixed?

---

good luck, Oso doenst believe there were any epection mishaps

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

historian said:

---

It's only more principled to vote for the Dem if one is a Leftist / commie / fascist who wants to see America decline further. I've never heard that position described as patriotic or loyal. It's amazing how far done people will go because of TDS.

---

Well, the poster in question has admitted on these boards he actually funded and voted for Democrat candidates in Texas in 2022 due to Republicans' support of Trump, one of whom wanted universal access to abortions on the govt. dime.

I mean, when you're so motivated by your hatred of a candidate that you would financially support candidates who support such evil and heinous policy, you've lost the right to call anyone else unprincipled.

---

Not true. Name the Democrat in Texas I sent money

---

If you say so. I recall you saying you were giving money to the Dems Cheney supported. Perhaps they were not Texas Dems, or perhaps you ultimately decided against it. I guess, you simply voted for them, including a pro-abortion on demand candidate.

---

Weak
You got nothing
Understandable

---

And yet, you've failed to refute anything I've said.

1) Do you deny you said you were financially supporting the candidates Liz Cheney threw her support behind?

2) Do you deny you said you voted for the Democrat AG candidate?

3) Do you deny you said you voted for the Democrat RR Commissioner?

---

I gave money to Republican Liz Cheney. Never financially supported any Democrat, unlike you who admit s supporting Democrat

Did not vote for Dem RR Commissioner, but did vote against crooked Ken Paxton

You voted for Dems Why can't others do the same?

You are a pragmatic voter & that pragmatism is more important to you than principle

---

So you deny you said you were financially supporting the candidates Liz Cheney threw her support behind? Yes or no?

What other Dems did you vote for the last election cycle?

I never said you can't vote for Dems. As always, it depends on the position. As I tried to explain to you previously (apparently to no avail), if it's a local, apolitical position (in this case a county tax assessor), I don't see an issue with voting for a Dem who is a friend. As I also tried to explain, the Dem party has changed quite a bit since I last voted for one.

State and national elections are a whole different ball of wax. I am not surprised you fail to understand the difference. You're a dim bulb.

---

I have no problem with your voting for a Democrat. My problem is your judgement and flexible principles

I've never financially supported a Democrat Liz recommended
You admit voting for crooked Ken? Very flexible principles

---

Which specific principles have I compromised on? Please name them specifically.

So you have supported a Democrat financially. Which ones?

Of course I voted for Ken Paxton over the pro-abortion on demand candidate that wanted federally funded abortions you voted for. No conservative would have voted otherwise.

But there's your flexible principles again.

---

Voting for a crook is pretty flexible

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

historian said:

---

It's only more principled to vote for the Dem if one is a Leftist / commie / fascist who wants to see America decline further. I've never heard that position described as patriotic or loyal. It's amazing how far done people will go because of TDS.

---

Well, the poster in question has admitted on these boards he actually funded and voted for Democrat candidates in Texas in 2022 due to Republicans' support of Trump, one of whom wanted universal access to abortions on the govt. dime.

I mean, when you're so motivated by your hatred of a candidate that you would financially support candidates who support such evil and heinous policy, you've lost the right to call anyone else unprincipled.

---

Not true. Name the Democrat in Texas I sent money

---

If you say so. I recall you saying you were giving money to the Dems Cheney supported. Perhaps they were not Texas Dems, or perhaps you ultimately decided against it. I guess, you simply voted for them, including a pro-abortion on demand candidate.

---

Weak
You got nothing
Understandable

---

And yet, you've failed to refute anything I've said.

1) Do you deny you said you were financially supporting the candidates Liz Cheney threw her support behind?

2) Do you deny you said you voted for the Democrat AG candidate?

3) Do you deny you said you voted for the Democrat RR Commissioner?

---

I gave money to Republican Liz Cheney. Never financially supported any Democrat, unlike you who admit s supporting Democrat

Did not vote for Dem RR Commissioner, but did vote against crooked Ken Paxton

You voted for Dems Why can't others do the same?

You are a pragmatic voter & that pragmatism is more important to you than principle

---

So you deny you said you were financially supporting the candidates Liz Cheney threw her support behind? Yes or no?

What other Dems did you vote for the last election cycle?

I never said you can't vote for Dems. As always, it depends on the position. As I tried to explain to you previously (apparently to no avail), if it's a local, apolitical position (in this case a county tax assessor), I don't see an issue with voting for a Dem who is a friend. As I also tried to explain, the Dem party has changed quite a bit since I last voted for one.

State and national elections are a whole different ball of wax. I am not surprised you fail to understand the difference. You're a dim bulb.

---

I have no problem with your voting for a Democrat. My problem is your judgement and flexible principles

I've never financially supported a Democrat Liz recommended
You admit voting for crooked Ken? Very flexible principles

---

Which specific principles have I compromised on? Please name them specifically.

So you have supported a Democrat financially. Which ones?

Of course I voted for Ken Paxton over the pro-abortion on demand candidate that wanted federally funded abortions you voted for. No conservative would have voted otherwise.

But there's your flexible principles again.

---

Voting for a crook is pretty flexible

---

Ah, so nothing specific then. Predictable.

I would submit voting for Trump is even less flexible than voting in a way that gets the most leftist president in the history of the country ever elected. But you hate Trump more than you hate open borders, wars, debt, and woke policy.

4th and Inches said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.

Yes they’re calling for invalidating the election if it doesn’t go their way

But DON’T YOU DARE, EVER suggest that they might cheat in elections https://t.co/HDdLIvNYXB

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) August 6, 2024

---

Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results

---

He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.

Clip of Raskin threatening to use force to fight “Trump mobs” on Jan 6, 2025 to remove Trump under insurrection clause is 💯 real.

Here is another clip from same event where Raskin denounced SCOTUS for pending CO insurrection decision and blames court for likely civil war.

Sick pic.twitter.com/2PMWV5I2Mb

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2024

---

Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters

---

The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.

---

I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?

---

Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.

---

I watched the video. I'll defend election results whichever way it goes. Will you?

---

Sure. If there's mishaps like in 2020, will you say that our election process needs to be fixed?

---

good luck, Oso doenst believe there were any epection mishaps

---

If an authority claims something contrary to facts, Democrats and left leaning individuals aren't the kind of people that will question them.

Evidence suggests that brains are wired different between conservative and left-leaning individuals. Brain imaging studies have even shown that the fear center of the brain, the amygdala, is actually larger in conservatives than in lefties. In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.

Yes they’re calling for invalidating the election if it doesn’t go their way

But DON’T YOU DARE, EVER suggest that they might cheat in elections https://t.co/HDdLIvNYXB

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) August 6, 2024

---

Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results

---

He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.

Clip of Raskin threatening to use force to fight “Trump mobs” on Jan 6, 2025 to remove Trump under insurrection clause is 💯 real.

Here is another clip from same event where Raskin denounced SCOTUS for pending CO insurrection decision and blames court for likely civil war.

Sick pic.twitter.com/2PMWV5I2Mb

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2024

---

Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters

---

The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.

---

I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?

---

Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.

---

If Trump wins, cities will burn and the democrats will encourage it.

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Aliceinbubbleland said:

---

I'm pretty sure the markets fell a helluvalot more than that when Trump was President. I do not believe either President had much to do with the markets.

---

Agreed

---

do you? Seem to recall a thread you started thanking Biden for the stock market soaring

---

It was tongue in cheek. Presidents have little if any control over the markets. I was pointing the hypocrisy of the right for thanking Trump for the markets rise then Biden didn't get credit.

Whiskey Pete said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.

Yes they’re calling for invalidating the election if it doesn’t go their way

But DON’T YOU DARE, EVER suggest that they might cheat in elections https://t.co/HDdLIvNYXB

— Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) August 6, 2024

---

Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results

---

He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.

Clip of Raskin threatening to use force to fight “Trump mobs” on Jan 6, 2025 to remove Trump under insurrection clause is 💯 real.

Here is another clip from same event where Raskin denounced SCOTUS for pending CO insurrection decision and blames court for likely civil war.

Sick pic.twitter.com/2PMWV5I2Mb

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 6, 2024

---

Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters

---

The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.

---

I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?

---

Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.

---

If Trump wins, cities will burn and the democrats will encourage it.

---

hahahahaa

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

been offing that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in?

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.

---

The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.

---

The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union

---

done deal.. next!

Everybody has been equal in the eyes of the law for years

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.

---

The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union

---

done deal.. next!

Everybody has been equal in the eyes of the law for years

---

Not what I said. I said equal opportunity and justice

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.

---

The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union

---

done deal.. next!

Everybody has been equal in the eyes of the law for years

---

Not what I said. I said equal opportunity and justice

---

yep, we are there..

All us citizens have the same equal rights and are equal in the eyes of the law aka justice

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.

---

The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union

---

done deal.. next!

Everybody has been equal in the eyes of the law for years

---

Not what I said. I said equal opportunity and justice

---

Give up Waco, we all know you well enough to know you really mean 'give my political faction power or else'.

Go pound sand.

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.

---

The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union

---

done deal.. next!

Everybody has been equal in the eyes of the law for years

---

Not what I said. I said equal opportunity and justice

---

yep, we are there. and justice"

All us citizens have the same equal rights and are equal in the eyes of the law aka justice Equal in the eyes of the law is different than justice. Police Officers are supposed to others as equal before the law but black drivers in white neighborhoods are regularly pulled for driving while black -- that's not justice.

---

.I keep saying "Equal opportunity' which you keep ignoring.

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.

---

The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union

---

done deal.. next!

Everybody has been equal in the eyes of the law for years

---

Not what I said. I said equal opportunity and justice

---

yep, we are there. and justice"

All us citizens have the same equal rights and are equal in the eyes of the law aka justice Equal in the eyes of the law is different than justice. Police Officers are supposed to others as equal before the law but black drivers in white neighborhoods are regularly pulled for driving while black -- that's not justice.

---

.I keep saying "Equal opportunity' which you keep ignoring.

---

We all know what you mean by your double-talk, Waco.

Equal Opportunity. as defined my reasonable people, was established in US law long ago.

The version you are shilling, Waco, and frankly not doing well, is nothing more than partisan whining. It's not fooling anyone, nor helping your credibility.

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

No you sit by and let people convince children they're the wrong gender and then tell yourself that genital mutilation, sterilization and stunted brain development through hormone therapy is passionate.

You allow child and drug trafficking across our border because you tell yourself that illegal immigration is passionate.

You have a giant government that prints trillions of dollars and destroys our buying power because you tell yourself that the pursuit of a nanny state is passionate.

You're aligned with Satan and wolves in sheep's clothing. You live in an animalistic state and don't deliberate internally like we do. You don't have an inner monologue. You're not reasoning through your thoughts in real time.

I might suggest that at this point we can summarize the chief weaknesses of the two major candidates as follows:

Trump - runs every decision or statement through his ego, and has been known to throw common sense out the window

Harris - has no accomplishments, cannot verbally argue a point unless it's printed on a script for her, and every decision is not hers but her handlers'.

Bonus weakness

RFK Jr. - A predilection of coming up with embarrassing and incredible behavior even stranger than what we have heard from Trump or Harris.

I don't get the purpose of this

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.

---

The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union

---

done deal.. next!

Everybody has been equal in the eyes of the law for years

---

Not what I said. I said equal opportunity and justice

---

yep, we are there. and justice"

All us citizens have the same equal rights and are equal in the eyes of the law aka justice Equal in the eyes of the law is different than justice. Police Officers are supposed to others as equal before the law but black drivers in white neighborhoods are regularly pulled for driving while black -- that's not justice.

---

.I keep saying "Equal opportunity' which you keep ignoring.

---

i havent ignored anything. You think who you vote for is gonna change anything related to how a police officer chooses to preform his civic duty?

As for those elected officials, Nothing has changed in years, the worst cities are democrat run but lets give them another chance.. this is the time they get it right.

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.

---

The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union

---

done deal.. next!

Everybody has been equal in the eyes of the law for years

---

Not what I said. I said equal opportunity and justice

---

yep, we are there. and justice"

All us citizens have the same equal rights and are equal in the eyes of the law aka justice Equal in the eyes of the law is different than justice. Police Officers are supposed to others as equal before the law but black drivers in white neighborhoods are regularly pulled for driving while black -- that's not justice.

---

.I keep saying "Equal opportunity' which you keep ignoring.

---

i haven't ignored anything. You think who you vote for is gonna change anything related to how a police officer chooses to preform his civic duty? Funds for better police training, better assessment of potential, police officers, more funding for staffing.

As for those elected officials, Nothing has changed in years, the worst cities are democrat run but lets give them another chance.. this is the time they get it right. The source of inequality and injustice go way deeper than Democratic mayors. It's a useless canard

---

boognish_bear said:

---

I don't get the purpose of this

---

That's because you are reasonable.

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.

---

been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.

---

The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union

---

done deal.. next!

Everybody has been equal in the eyes of the law for years

---

Not what I said. I said equal opportunity and justice

---

yep, we are there. and justice"

All us citizens have the same equal rights and are equal in the eyes of the law aka justice Equal in the eyes of the law is different than justice. Police Officers are supposed to others as equal before the law but black drivers in white neighborhoods are regularly pulled for driving while black -- that's not justice.

---

.I keep saying "Equal opportunity' which you keep ignoring.

---

i haven't ignored anything. You think who you vote for is gonna change anything related to how a police officer chooses to preform his civic duty? Funds for better police training, better assessment of potential, police officers, more funding for staffing.

As for those elected officials, Nothing has changed in years, the worst cities are democrat run but lets give them another chance.. this is the time they get it right. The source of inequality and injustice go way deeper than Democratic mayors. It's a useless canard

---

---

you do know yall are the party of defund the police right?

This is the most Radical Left duo in American history. There has never been anything like it, and there never will be again. Crazy Kamabla is, indeed, CRAZY. I HEAR THERE IS A BIG MOVEMENT TO “BRING BACK CROOKED JOE.”

Donald Trump Truth Social 03:36 PM EST 08/06/24…

— Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) August 6, 2024