BUDOS said:
Again I partially agree with you; however, for starters, explain to me how he is worthy of being president after his participation in January 6th? Being a convicted felon? Continuing to spread lies about a stolen election that repeatedly got thrown out on its merits, including Trump appointed judges? Then the Access tapes? Sharing sensitive classified information more than once? Lying then obstructing justice about the records he took from the White House? His incoherent statements during his rallies? His lack of credibility, integrity, immorality, and lack of respect by most of our allies? That's enough for starters.
Here's the deal: I don't think either candidate is worthy of being president. I think the anti-democratic manner in which Biden was replaced with Harris, and her position changes on almost every single major issue should have disqualified her. She's a vapid, shape-shifter, and will say damn near anything to get elected.
But it's either her or Trump this election cycle. I don't like what Trump did during the 2020 election, but I also recognize that his political opponents engaged in a campaign of lawfare to try and disqualify him. Is there anything more anti-democracy than that? I mean, they essentially created a new crime in NY to get the guy convicted. The charges were completely unprecedented.
Again, as I've tried to explain, since both Harris and Trump are unworthy, the question you should be asking yourself is whose policies will be better for the country? The answer to the question should be obvious to someone describing themselves as a moderate.