(Not) Born This Way

15,648 Views | 313 Replies | Last: 9 mo ago by quash
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Redbrickbear said:


Africa may end up being the last sane place on the planet.

Odd that suddenly the regressives support cultural appropriation and imperialism.

Its certainly the last region on earth that is still having children.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.
Left libertarianism has it wrong.

The problem with left libertarianism is that 'consent' is a threadbare edifice on which to build sacred moral values.

Given the right circumstances, anyone can "consent" to anything. Given human nature, the outcome of pure left libertarianism is mass degeneracy.

Also, you have the border issue wrong. Borders are there to protect property rights.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?


A drag show performed for children should be a crime and every adult participating in it should face charges.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?


A drag show performed for children should be a crime and every adult participating in it should face charges.


That is flat out lunacy. Pass that law. Strictly enforce it. You won't stop the actual groomers in churches and schools.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mentally I'll people being abused by Big Pharma and sex clinics

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2023/06/07/undercover-investigation-reveals-how-shockingly-easy-it-is-to-get-transgender-surgeries-approved-n1701317

During the undercover investigation, Walsh and his team exposed how easily one can obtain approval for sex-change surgery. Remarkably, Gregg Re, Walsh's producer, received a green light for an orchiectomy (a testicle removal procedure) after a mere 22-minute virtual consultation with Plume the largest transgender healthcare provider in the United States.

Re succeeded in securing a video call appointment with Plume by using a fake name on the intake form. During the call, Re openly admitted that he had not been experiencing gender dysphoria for six months or more, which is technically required for approval. Additionally, he mispronounced the name of the desired surgery and expressed uncertainty about its potential effects on him. While these should have been treated as red flags and grounds for rejection, Plume's nurse practitioner astonishingly expressed her intention to craft the most convincing letter possible to justify Re's surgery.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:


Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:


A doctor let a pretty girl mutilate herself instead of referring her for psychiatric and emotional help.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

whiterock said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?


A drag show performed for children should be a crime and every adult participating in it should face charges.


That is flat out lunacy. Pass that law. Strictly enforce it. You won't stop the actual groomers in churches and schools.

School boards issue dress codes, do they not? Cities have zoning and ordinances, don't they? The state has statute on curriculum, does it not? Hell, a plain ol' permission slip would go a long way. When I was in grade school I had to carry home a permission slip for my parents to sign before I could go on a tour down at the Pure Milk plant, or the Zoo, or Strecker Museum. But schools have assumed that they own the kids, that the parents have no say in such things because too many of them are proto-fascists and teachers after all know what is best.

If drag shows are ok, why not strippers?
If strippers are ok, why not llap dances?
If lap dances are ok, why not....

It'd be a lot easier to debate standards if you had any, but I suspect some would materialize of thin air when the Baptists asked for some time on stage.



whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.
"You can't take your kids to a drag show, but the school can bring a drag show to your kids."

Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.
"You can't take your kids to a drag show, but the school can bring a drag show to your kids."

Just for clarification, I don't think that is your position or mine
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.
"You can't take your kids to a drag show, but the school can bring a drag show to your kids."

Just for clarification, I don't think that is your position or mine
Agreed. Poking at quash
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?
I don't want you or a teacher deciding that it isn't. It's a perversion.

I'm not making it against the law, just let the kids grow up without bending them
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?



Yes. It is harmful to adults also.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here, we see Quash making the case that grooming of children for sexual deviancy is such a good idea that we must teach it in public schools.

Next, he will suggest the school day look like this: replace gym class Pole Dancing 101, modify the chemistry labs for hands-on tutorials in Applied Orgasms, and insert a seminar on Butt-plug Basics somewhere at the end.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Here, we see Quash making the case that grooming of children for sexual deviancy is such a good idea that we must teach it in public schools.

Next, he will suggest the school day look like this: replace gym class Pole Dancing 101, modify the chemistry labs for hands-on tutorials in Applied Orgasms, and insert a seminar on Butt-plug Basics somewhere at the end.
lol. That's punny
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?



Yes. It is harmful to adults also.


Source?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?



Yes. It is harmful to adults also.


Source?



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?



Yes. It is harmful to adults also.


Source?



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.

Don't let him motte & Bailey you with extraneous questions like that. Make him prove drag shows are a benefit.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

Exactly,

I have never heard a single argument for why we can legislate limits when it comes to kids and beer/cigarettes but somehow the State setting limits on permanent unalterable gender surgeries, sexualized drag shows, or pornography directed at children is somehow beyond the limit.

In fact we actually used to let kids consume beer/cigarettes....young people could drink beer-wine and smoke cigarettes' for most of European and American history.

We stopped that because we said...you know this might not be in the best interest of children to expose them to these things at such a young age.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?



Yes. It is harmful to adults also.



Source?



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.


You realize those stats are negatively impacted by cristofascist hate, right?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?



Yes. It is harmful to adults also.



Source?



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.


You realize those stats are negatively impacted by cristofascist hate, right?

47 is only one person. I doubt that he can have a statistical impact
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Quote:

Quote:



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.


You realize those stats are negatively impacted by cristofascist hate, right?

47 is only one person. I doubt that he can have a statistical impact
The avatar for intolerance usta be the blue-haired old church ladies who looked down their nose at people who didn't say/do the right things.

Now it's the blue-haired Antifa who will burn down your business if they can't get you fired for not saying/doing the right things.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?



Yes. It is harmful to adults also.



Source?



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.


You realize those stats are negatively impacted by cristofascist hate, right?

I am sorry you feel that way. I thought we could trust and follow the science.

Those numbers have been used for years to tell us why we need to fund services for those who are engaged in alternative lifestyles and why we need to have gay marriage and alter society. Now, you are telling me that you cannot trust the numbers because the church goers you despise somehow altered peer-review numbers.

Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?



Yes. It is harmful to adults also.



Source?



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.


You realize those stats are negatively impacted by cristofascist hate, right?



"cristofacist"?
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?



Yes. It is harmful to adults also.



Source?



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.


You realize those stats are negatively impacted by cristofascist hate, right?


"cristfacist"


Cristfacist: noun. Anyone that is somewhat vocal, claims to be Christian, and disagrees politically with quash

(often associated with "moving goalpost")
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"drag queens" and "drag shows" are inherently sexual. That does not mean every time a man dresses in drag it is necessarily, but a "drag queen" has a specific, sexualized connation.

As noted above, no one can explain why "drag queens" reading to children is so critical and how much it improves the overall reading scores of young children. Where is the data that shows "drag queens" reading to kids improves reading proficiency and test scores.

Kids should not be political pawns. The focus should be on the kids and not the queens. No one would object if a man that performs as a drag queen wanted to read to kids wearing his polo and khakis, but it never has been about the children.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?



Yes. It is harmful to adults also.



Source?



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.


You realize those stats are negatively impacted by cristofascist hate, right?


"cristfacist"


Cristfacist: noun. Anyone that is somewhat vocal, claims to be Christian, and disagrees politically with quash

(often associated with "moving goalpost")
https://polcompballanarchy.miraheze.org/wiki/Libertarian_Fascism

It seems libertarian fascism is thing
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:



Source?



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.


You realize those stats are negatively impacted by cristofascist hate, right?


"cristfacist"


Cristfacist: noun. Anyone that is somewhat vocal, claims to be Christian, and disagrees politically with quash

(often associated with "moving goalpost")
https://polcompballanarchy.miraheze.org/wiki/Libertarian_Fascism

It seems libertarian fascism is thing
Have a bird dog buddy, nicest guy in the world, thoughtful, soft-spoken, railroad engineer who reads poetry. And yes, a big atheist liberal. Only time I have ever seen him express disgust was about libertarians.

Collectivism makes a lot of people feel warm & fuzzy. Just outrages them when someone doesn't want to join the group hug.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:



Source?



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.


You realize those stats are negatively impacted by cristofascist hate, right?


"cristfacist"


Cristfacist: noun. Anyone that is somewhat vocal, claims to be Christian, and disagrees politically with quash

(often associated with "moving goalpost")
https://polcompballanarchy.miraheze.org/wiki/Libertarian_Fascism

It seems libertarian fascism is thing
Have a bird dog buddy, nicest guy in the world, thoughtful, soft-spoken, railroad engineer who reads poetry. And yes, a big atheist liberal. Only time I have ever seen him express disgust was about libertarians.

Collectivism makes a lot of people feel warm & fuzzy. Just outrages them when someone doesn't want to join the group hug.


How many handouts does he give his GSH?
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Osodecentx said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Why do so many celebrate giving kids over to pedophiles.

Why are states regulating drag queen reading hours at libraries and not the people far more likely to groom and assault? We know who is much more likely to sexually abuse kids: men who work in churches.


Church personnel who abuse kids are violating criminal and civil laws.


Yep, and yet they don't get banned from libraries.



Let's see the libertarian law to stop that evil


You have that completely backwards. Libertarians oppose restrictions on drag.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of claiming it's about protecting kids. It's plainly not.


Is there anything, in your opinion, from which children should be protected? Child porn? Human trafficking? Sexual relations with adults?


Sure, you're talking about criminal actions. Do you really believe drag should be criminalized?

For children, yes. We don't let them into bars or liquor stores. They don't get to smoke or even buy cigarettes. Children don't get to vote or buy guns.

If folks want to dress up and pretend for other adults, knock yourself out.

You think drag is inherently harmful to kids?



Yes. It is harmful to adults also.



Source?



Go look at the stats for psychological and emotional problems for those who are in alternative lifestyles vs the average population. This is not something that should be endorsed or encouraged.


You realize those stats are negatively impacted by cristofascist hate, right?


"cristfacist"


Cristfacist: noun. Anyone that is somewhat vocal, claims to be Christian, and disagrees politically with quash

(often associated with "moving goalpost")
https://polcompballanarchy.miraheze.org/wiki/Libertarian_Fascism

It seems libertarian fascism is thing


The definition certainly is. Never run across one
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.