RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

TRUMP: I'll make America a banana republic again. No one can twist the law and get away with it like me.

BRAGG: Hold my beer.

---

Banana Republic?

---

No, just banana republic.

Osodecentx said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

TRUMP: I'll make America a banana republic again. No one can twist the law and get away with it like me.

BRAGG: Hold my beer.

---

Trump has convinced some here that everybody does it, so everybody ought to get to do it

---

There you see TDS Stage 4: Even when Trump is the victim of some outrageous behavior against him, it's somehow still his fault.

That post has all the critical thought of a Pee Wee Herman monologue.

How about we try this?

Donald Trump is an opportunist and full-on-bloviator, the kind of guy who can watch Joe Isuzu and not see it for parody. He has cheated on multiple wives and worked a number of deals where he made out all right but others took a loss. Trump is thin-skinned and a narcissist on his good days.

With all that said, you would be hard-pressed to find specific evidence that Donald Trump knowingly broke the law. I can say this, because I know his enemies have spent literally the better part of seven years now trying to find anything they could use against him, and nothing, literally nothing, has been produced.

Whether Trump should ever be President again is one topic. Rigging the court system to harass him so he can't even run is b u l l s h i t beyond any excuse.

If you can't admit that fact, you have completely lost any decency yourself.

And for the record, DeSantis has so far handled this issue perfectly.

whiterock said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

I want Trump out of politics and I knew this was a sham but had no idea how political this really was. Read this thread about Biden's #3 guy at the DOJ that went to work with the Manhattan DA to make up this case. He's as dirty and liberal as they come.

2) @TruthNinja316 (who was JUST oddly suspended on Twitter) said it perfectly in regards to Matthew Colangelo:

"The man comes in to work for Bragg after working DIRECTLY for Barrack Obama, Joe Biden, and Merrick Garland and says this....then Trump is indicted THREE MONTHS LATER.…

— Gain of Fauci (@DschlopesIsBack) April 4, 2023

6) "Meet Merrick Garland's inner circle of 22 officials" - Guess who was one of them? The aforementioned Matthew Colangelo... pic.twitter.com/Fgf2RUPPCZ

— Gain of Fauci (@DschlopesIsBack) April 4, 2023

---

I agree with you. Trump is poison. The longer he stays in, the more of these events will happen and we will have to listen to more asinine speeches like last hour.

Rather than talking about the Biden failures and policies, we are talking about Fact Checking Trump speeches.

---

also not talking about Democrats abusing power for political purposes to distract voters from failures of Democrat policies.

---

Yup, the Dems are loving Trump. Obama and Biden probably watched the speech with popcorn. Yelling at the TV, "you go!!!"

RMF5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

I want Trump out of politics and I knew this was a sham but had no idea how political this really was. Read this thread about Biden's #3 guy at the DOJ that went to work with the Manhattan DA to make up this case. He's as dirty and liberal as they come.

2) @TruthNinja316 (who was JUST oddly suspended on Twitter) said it perfectly in regards to Matthew Colangelo:

"The man comes in to work for Bragg after working DIRECTLY for Barrack Obama, Joe Biden, and Merrick Garland and says this....then Trump is indicted THREE MONTHS LATER.…

— Gain of Fauci (@DschlopesIsBack) April 4, 2023

6) "Meet Merrick Garland's inner circle of 22 officials" - Guess who was one of them? The aforementioned Matthew Colangelo... pic.twitter.com/Fgf2RUPPCZ

— Gain of Fauci (@DschlopesIsBack) April 4, 2023

---

I agree with you. Trump is poison. The longer he stays in, the more of these events will happen and we will have to listen to more asinine speeches like last hour.

Rather than talking about the Biden failures and policies, we are talking about Fact Checking Trump speeches.

---

also not talking about Democrats abusing power for political purposes to distract voters from failures of Democrat policies.

---

Yup, the Dems are loving Trump. Obama and Biden probably watched the speech with popcorn. Yelling at the TV, "you go!!!"

---

Yep

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

I want Trump out of politics and I knew this was a sham but had no idea how political this really was. Read this thread about Biden's #3 guy at the DOJ that went to work with the Manhattan DA to make up this case. He's as dirty and liberal as they come.

2) @TruthNinja316 (who was JUST oddly suspended on Twitter) said it perfectly in regards to Matthew Colangelo:

"The man comes in to work for Bragg after working DIRECTLY for Barrack Obama, Joe Biden, and Merrick Garland and says this....then Trump is indicted THREE MONTHS LATER.…

— Gain of Fauci (@DschlopesIsBack) April 4, 2023

6) "Meet Merrick Garland's inner circle of 22 officials" - Guess who was one of them? The aforementioned Matthew Colangelo... pic.twitter.com/Fgf2RUPPCZ

— Gain of Fauci (@DschlopesIsBack) April 4, 2023

---

I agree with you. Trump is poison. The longer he stays in, the more of these events will happen and we will have to listen to more asinine speeches like last hour.

Rather than talking about the Biden failures and policies, we are talking about Fact Checking Trump speeches.

---

also not talking about Democrats abusing power for political purposes to distract voters from failures of Democrat policies.

---

Yup, the Dems are loving Trump. Obama and Biden probably watched the speech with popcorn. Yelling at the TV, "you go!!!"

---

Yep

---

He keeps falling for it, every time. The guy CAN'T keep his mouth shut.

RMF5630 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

I want Trump out of politics and I knew this was a sham but had no idea how political this really was. Read this thread about Biden's #3 guy at the DOJ that went to work with the Manhattan DA to make up this case. He's as dirty and liberal as they come.

2) @TruthNinja316 (who was JUST oddly suspended on Twitter) said it perfectly in regards to Matthew Colangelo:

"The man comes in to work for Bragg after working DIRECTLY for Barrack Obama, Joe Biden, and Merrick Garland and says this....then Trump is indicted THREE MONTHS LATER.…

— Gain of Fauci (@DschlopesIsBack) April 4, 2023

6) "Meet Merrick Garland's inner circle of 22 officials" - Guess who was one of them? The aforementioned Matthew Colangelo... pic.twitter.com/Fgf2RUPPCZ

— Gain of Fauci (@DschlopesIsBack) April 4, 2023

---

I agree with you. Trump is poison. The longer he stays in, the more of these events will happen and we will have to listen to more asinine speeches like last hour.

Rather than talking about the Biden failures and policies, we are talking about Fact Checking Trump speeches.

---

also not talking about Democrats abusing power for political purposes to distract voters from failures of Democrat policies.

---

Yup, the Dems are loving Trump. Obama and Biden probably watched the speech with popcorn. Yelling at the TV, "you go!!!"

---

Yep

---

He keeps falling for it, every time. The guy CAN'T keep his mouth shut.

---

He has the right to remain silent, but not the ability

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

It's because it's a cult.

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

Whether a crime is really committed is important to a lot of folks, but not to the TDS crowd.

LateSteak69 said:

---

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

It's because it's a cult.

---

You certainly show the cult characteristics.

You even hate when and how you are told.

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

It's because it's a cult.

---

You certainly show the cult characteristics.

You even hate when and how you are told.

---

nothing more ironic than neverTrumpers talking about others being a cult

Defund the police !

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

It's because it's a cult.

---

You certainly show the cult characteristics.

You even hate when and how you are told.

---

nothing more ironic than neverTrumpers talking about others being a cult

---

Well, it's in their script, so ...

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

I bet you didn't know that Trump decided NOT to investigate Hillary in 2016, saying the Country needed to heal.

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

It's because it's a cult.

---

You certainly show the cult characteristics.

You even hate when and how you are told.

---

nothing more ironic than neverTrumpers talking about others being a cult

---

cults usually have a leader.

LateSteak69 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

It's because it's a cult.

---

You certainly show the cult characteristics.

You even hate when and how you are told.

---

nothing more ironic than neverTrumpers talking about others being a cult

---

cults usually have a leader.

---

Some cults hide their leaders. BLM and ANTIFA being obvious examples.

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

It's because it's a cult.

---

You certainly show the cult characteristics.

You even hate when and how you are told.

---

nothing more ironic than neverTrumpers talking about others being a cult

---

cults usually have a leader.

---

Some cults hide their leaders. BLM and ANTIFA being obvious examples.

---

oh, ok. So who is the hidden nevertrump leader?

BylrFan said:

---

Defund the police !

---

sorta..

Based on the fact most if the fed knapping people were FBI payrolled and now it looks like most of the proudboys were also FBI/homeland..

Scaling back on creating crime would be a start.

4th and Inches said:

---

BylrFan said:

---

Defund the police !

---

sorta..

Based on the fact most if the fed knapping people were FBI payrolled and now it looks like most of the proudboys were also FBI/homeland..

Scaling back on creating crime would be a start.

---

Fact?

LateSteak69 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

It's because it's a cult.

---

You certainly show the cult characteristics.

You even hate when and how you are told.

---

nothing more ironic than neverTrumpers talking about others being a cult

---

cults usually have a leader.

---

Some cults hide their leaders. BLM and ANTIFA being obvious examples.

---

oh, ok. So who is the hidden nevertrump leader?

---

Not my crew

RMF5630 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

BylrFan said:

---

Defund the police !

---

sorta..

Based on the fact most if the fed knapping people were FBI payrolled and now it looks like most of the proudboys were also FBI/homeland..

Scaling back on creating crime would be a start.

---

Fact?

---

Of course not

whiterock said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

We will see what happens. Is there actually anyone who thinks Trump didn't violate the law with campaign finances?

And the guy spent his 4 years antagonizing the shot out of Democrats. I have no idea what else anyone expected. New York was investigating him constantly.

---

Explain how he did.
(hint: you can't).

Am also amused to see the inference that antagonizing Democrats justifies unremitting lawfare. One of the oldest rules of combat is - line of sight is reciprocal. Otherwise known by the public as "you reap what you sow."

---

Petty people beget pettiness, basic law of the universe. When you are the most powerful person on the planet for a time, and you spend time sowing hate, division, and distrust in America, you will reap what you have sown.

You're entirely correct.

RMF5630 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

BylrFan said:

---

Defund the police !

---

sorta..

Based on the fact most if the fed knapping people were FBI payrolled and now it looks like most of the proudboys were also FBI/homeland..

Scaling back on creating crime would be a start.

---

Fact?

---

um, yeah.. google it. Fact.

Took a second trial where the judge suppressed the evidence of entrapment for FBI to get the conviction.

Porteroso said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

We will see what happens. Is there actually anyone who thinks Trump didn't violate the law with campaign finances?

And the guy spent his 4 years antagonizing the shot out of Democrats. I have no idea what else anyone expected. New York was investigating him constantly.

---

Explain how he did.
(hint: you can't).

Am also amused to see the inference that antagonizing Democrats justifies unremitting lawfare. One of the oldest rules of combat is - line of sight is reciprocal. Otherwise known by the public as "you reap what you sow."

---

Petty people beget pettiness, basic law of the universe. When you are the most powerful person on the planet for a time, and you spend time sowing hate, division, and distrust in America, you will reap what you have sown.

You're entirely correct.

---

You equate failing to wave back at your neighbor with burning down your neighbors house in retaliation. "Petty begets petty!"

4th and Inches said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

BylrFan said:

---

Defund the police !

---

sorta..

Based on the fact most if the fed knapping people were FBI payrolled and now it looks like most of the proudboys were also FBI/homeland..

Scaling back on creating crime would be a start.

---

Fact?

---

um, yeah.. google it. Fact.

Took a second trial where the judge suppressed the evidence of entrapment for FBI to get the conviction.

---

Entrapment? That is not bankrolling kidnappings or that the Proudboys were in the FBI/HSA. True they were found guilty of entrapment. Why embellish? The truth is bad enough...

RMF5630 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

RMF5630 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

BylrFan said:

---

Defund the police !

---

sorta..

Based on the fact most if the fed knapping people were FBI payrolled and now it looks like most of the proudboys were also FBI/homeland..

Scaling back on creating crime would be a start.

---

Fact?

---

um, yeah.. google it. Fact.

Took a second trial where the judge suppressed the evidence of entrapment for FBI to get the conviction.

---

Entrapment? That is not bankrolling kidnappings or that the Proudboys were in the FBI/HSA. True they were found guilty of entrapment. Why embellish? The truth is bad enough...

---

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.241009/gov.uscourts.dcd.241009.734.0_1.pdf

RMF5630 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

BylrFan said:

---

Defund the police !

---

sorta..

Based on the fact most if the fed knapping people were FBI payrolled and now it looks like most of the proudboys were also FBI/homeland..

Scaling back on creating crime would be a start.

---

Fact?

---

NEW bombshell filing in Proud Boys trial.

Defense writes that DOJ just recently disclosed involvement of undercover officers/informants from other agencies aside from FBI--DC Metro police and DHS.

"At least 40 undercover informants..." pic.twitter.com/aNErkjDtAr

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) April 6, 2023

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

It's because it's a cult.

---

You certainly show the cult characteristics.

You even hate when and how you are told.

---

nothing more ironic than neverTrumpers talking about others being a cult

---

cults usually have a leader.

---

Some cults hide their leaders. BLM and ANTIFA being obvious examples.

---

oh, ok. So who is the hidden nevertrump leader?

---

Not my crew

---

well BLM and Antifa probably aren't either but you seemed pretty sure about them,

LateSteak69 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

LateSteak69 said:

---

BleedGreen&Gold said:

---

I think it's hilarious that the candidate and party that ran on "Lock her Up" and "Law and Order" now doesn't believe it applies to Trump.

---

It's because it's a cult.

---

You certainly show the cult characteristics.

You even hate when and how you are told.

---

nothing more ironic than neverTrumpers talking about others being a cult

---

cults usually have a leader.

---

Some cults hide their leaders. BLM and ANTIFA being obvious examples.

---

oh, ok. So who is the hidden nevertrump leader?

---

Not my crew

---

well BLM and Antifa probably aren't either but you seemed pretty sure about them,

---

Heard from LEO who know.

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

We will see what happens. Is there actually anyone who thinks Trump didn't violate the law with campaign finances?

And the guy spent his 4 years antagonizing the shot out of Democrats. I have no idea what else anyone expected. New York was investigating him constantly.

---

Doesn't matter what you and I believe. The point is that violations of federal campaign finance laws are not even in Bragg's power to prosecute as a district attorney. Yet in order to convict, Bragg will need to prove Trump tried to conceal federal campaign finance violations that he has not been charged with and that are not actually named in the indictment. It's absolutely absurd banana republic bull *****

Regardless of how one feels about trump, we should all be concerned with what's happening in New York.

---

He had to charge the cover-up as the acts being covered are barred by limitations. It's basic prosecution.

---

To the contrary, he didn't have to do anything. He chose to try to seek an indictment of something unprecedented, and without solid legal footing. And now he's got to prove that a federal crime occurred many years ago to prove his case, despite lacking the jurisdiction to prosecute same..

There's nothing basic about it. But good to know you're cool with political prosecutions.

---

First, you're good with political prosecutions, too, you just can't admit it now.
Second, I have no idea how the court is going to treat state prosecution of federal crimes. SDNY already passed on it.
Third, why the reference to "many years ago"? If you're talking about limitations the bar won't hit until April 15.

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

We will see what happens. Is there actually anyone who thinks Trump didn't violate the law with campaign finances?

And the guy spent his 4 years antagonizing the shot out of Democrats. I have no idea what else anyone expected. New York was investigating him constantly.

---

Doesn't matter what you and I believe. The point is that violations of federal campaign finance laws are not even in Bragg's power to prosecute as a district attorney. Yet in order to convict, Bragg will need to prove Trump tried to conceal federal campaign finance violations that he has not been charged with and that are not actually named in the indictment. It's absolutely absurd banana republic bull *****

Regardless of how one feels about trump, we should all be concerned with what's happening in New York.

---

He had to charge the cover-up as the acts being covered are barred by limitations. It's basic prosecution.

---

To the contrary, he didn't have to do anything. He chose to try to seek an indictment of something unprecedented, and without solid legal footing. And now he's got to prove that a federal crime occurred many years ago to prove his case, despite lacking the jurisdiction to prosecute same..

There's nothing basic about it. But good to know you're cool with political prosecutions.

---

First, you're good with political prosecutions, too, you just can't admit it now.
Second, I have no idea how the court is going to treat state prosecution of federal crimes. SDNY already passed on it.
Third, why the reference to "many years ago"? If you're talking about limitations the bar won't hit until April 15.

---

What political prosecution do you think I'm OK with? And what evidence do you have to support your statement?

This should be interesting. Good luck!

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

We will see what happens. Is there actually anyone who thinks Trump didn't violate the law with campaign finances?

And the guy spent his 4 years antagonizing the shot out of Democrats. I have no idea what else anyone expected. New York was investigating him constantly.

---

Doesn't matter what you and I believe. The point is that violations of federal campaign finance laws are not even in Bragg's power to prosecute as a district attorney. Yet in order to convict, Bragg will need to prove Trump tried to conceal federal campaign finance violations that he has not been charged with and that are not actually named in the indictment. It's absolutely absurd banana republic bull *****

Regardless of how one feels about trump, we should all be concerned with what's happening in New York.

---

He had to charge the cover-up as the acts being covered are barred by limitations. It's basic prosecution.

---

To the contrary, he didn't have to do anything. He chose to try to seek an indictment of something unprecedented, and without solid legal footing. And now he's got to prove that a federal crime occurred many years ago to prove his case, despite lacking the jurisdiction to prosecute same..

There's nothing basic about it. But good to know you're cool with political prosecutions.

---

First, you're good with political prosecutions, too, you just can't admit it now.
Second, I have no idea how the court is going to treat state prosecution of federal crimes. SDNY already passed on it.
Third, why the reference to "many years ago"? If you're talking about limitations the bar won't hit until April 15.

---

What political prosecution do you think I'm OK with? And what evidence do you have to support your statement? This should be interesting. Good luck!

---

Whitewater, JW Price, etc

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

quash said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

We will see what happens. Is there actually anyone who thinks Trump didn't violate the law with campaign finances?

And the guy spent his 4 years antagonizing the shot out of Democrats. I have no idea what else anyone expected. New York was investigating him constantly.

---

Doesn't matter what you and I believe. The point is that violations of federal campaign finance laws are not even in Bragg's power to prosecute as a district attorney. Yet in order to convict, Bragg will need to prove Trump tried to conceal federal campaign finance violations that he has not been charged with and that are not actually named in the indictment. It's absolutely absurd banana republic bull *****

Regardless of how one feels about trump, we should all be concerned with what's happening in New York.

---

He had to charge the cover-up as the acts being covered are barred by limitations. It's basic prosecution.

---

To the contrary, he didn't have to do anything. He chose to try to seek an indictment of something unprecedented, and without solid legal footing. And now he's got to prove that a federal crime occurred many years ago to prove his case, despite lacking the jurisdiction to prosecute same..

There's nothing basic about it. But good to know you're cool with political prosecutions.

---

First, you're good with political prosecutions, too, you just can't admit it now.
Second, I have no idea how the court is going to treat state prosecution of federal crimes. SDNY already passed on it.
Third, why the reference to "many years ago"? If you're talking about limitations the bar won't hit until April 15.

---

What political prosecution do you think I'm OK with? And what evidence do you have to support your statement? This should be interesting. Good luck!

---

Whitewater, JW Price, etc

---

What a bunch of bull***** I've never even addressed white water on these boards. I do recall saying that the Republicans prosecution of Clinton was a huge mistake.

As for John Wiley price, the idea that the FBI's case against him was a political prosecution is total BS. It's well known that old John was taking bribes. You should see his classic car collection. The federal prosecutor ****ed that one up. That's on them. That was in no way a political prosecution.

Best possible result for the Republican Party would be for Trump to be found guilty of ANYTHING that would prohibit him from winning the Republican nomination in 2024 .


Which is why......when push comes to shove.....Dem power brokers will find a way to let 'poor martyr Trump' off the hook.


And available for the Republican nomination .......only to to lose the 2024 general election by an even larger margin than in 2020 .

KaiBear said:

---

Best possible result for the Republican Party would be for Trump to be found guilty of ANYTHING that would prohibit him from winning the Republican nomination in 2024 .


Which is why......when push comes to shove.....Dem power brokers will find a way to let 'poor martyr Trump' off the hook.


And available for the Republican nomination .......only to to lose the 2024 general election by an even larger margin than in 2020 .

---

Oh yeah. And idiot Trump playing right into the plan. He is so damn predictable, he CAN'T keep his mouth shut. Everytime he opens it, his whacko base digs in deeper and the independents/moderates rationalize that Biden is really not that bad.