How To Get To Heaven When You Die

213,675 Views | 2837 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by Assassin
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Speaking to the issue, and also focusing on the topic of the thread, it's important to understand the practice of forgiveness.

Too often, people imagine if they forgive someone that they are just letting go of something they could have used to accuse someone, and therefore this makes them a better person than the person they forgave. A game of ego, in other words, and not at all what Christ wants for us to do.

I believe that forgiving someone helps both the person doing the forgiving, and helps restore the soul/spirit of the person who receives that forgiveness.

This may be a way to examine the broader topic from a fresh perspective. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

What about the 8th council? What beliefs are being formed after it? Why do you engage in "read my mind" or "fill in the blanks" argumentation? You need more clarity in your communication.


Pretty much everything that we see today as Roman Catholic and Protestant distinctives were dogmatized after the 8th. In fact the Roman Catholic church initially accepted, and then rejected it.

Quote:

And as for Paul, what do you think he means by "damnation"? Does that mean going to hell and/or loss of salvation? Because if so, then this is in contradiction to your literal interpretation of "eating Jesus' flesh" in John 6. If you take the literal interpretation, then either Jesus is wrong, or Paul is wrong. They can't both be right.


Damnation means...damnation.

I don't see the contradiction unless you believe in OSAS. One is always free to walk away from Christ and commit spitirual suicide. Worst decision ever, but people do it including many famous evagelicals.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

What about the 8th council? What beliefs are being formed after it? Why do you engage in "read my mind" or "fill in the blanks" argumentation? You need more clarity in your communication.


Pretty much everything that we see today as Roman Catholic and Protestant distinctives were dogmatized after the 8th. In fact the Roman Catholic church initially accepted, and then rejected it.

Quote:

And as for Paul, what do you think he means by "damnation"? Does that mean going to hell and/or loss of salvation? Because if so, then this is in contradiction to your literal interpretation of "eating Jesus' flesh" in John 6. If you take the literal interpretation, then either Jesus is wrong, or Paul is wrong. They can't both be right.


Damnation means...damnation.

I don't see the contradiction unless you believe in OSAS. One is always free to walk away from Christ and commit spitirual suicide. Worst decision ever, but people do it including many famous evagelicals.
If you take the literal meaning of John 6, isn't the contradiction obvious? How does this need to be explained?

Jesus unequivocally states that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood you HAS eternal life, and he WILL raise you (John 6:54). If you are saying that the Eucharist is Jesus' literal flesh and blood, and you can eat his flesh and drink his blood.... but NOT have eternal life and NOT be raised, then you are directly contradicting what Jesus declares to be true.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am always afraid of the words 'true believer'.
Waco1947 ,la
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

I am always afraid of the words 'true believer'.
no reason to be afraid..

https://www.biblestudytools.com/deuteronomy/31-6.html
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

I am always afraid of the words 'true believer'.
no reason to be afraid..

https://www.biblestudytools.com/deuteronomy/31-6.html
'True believer' means someone like you is doing the judging by a standard you choose.
Waco1947 ,la
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

I am always afraid of the words 'true believer'.
no reason to be afraid..

https://www.biblestudytools.com/deuteronomy/31-6.html
'True believer' means someone like you is doing the judging by a standard you choose.
As commonly used, 'true believer' is a bit like 'True Scotsman', a fallacy used to justify an assumption.

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

I am always afraid of the words 'true believer'.
no reason to be afraid..

https://www.biblestudytools.com/deuteronomy/31-6.html
'True believer' means someone like you is doing the judging by a standard you choose.
it doesnt matter what others do, it matters what you do..

Do not be afraid..
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Perhaps, although so far you have received multiple answers, not just responses to your question, yet you miss it due to that log in your eye.

IF one believes that "once saved always saved" is true, they are wrong. If one becomes a believer and is saved, then falls away, fails to again seek forgiveness and repent, then he can expect to go to hell. However, we are living by our interpretation of the Bible and whichever translation/translations we have accepted. Now, in the instance you seem so caught up on, I answered it. You failed to see it. That is your problem; well at least part of your problem. Hopefully you are seeing someone to helpl you with your issues, and I am not trying to be cute.
In your responses, ask yourself WWJD as you go back and review them. You seem to be seeking a specific response and be damned with the rest. Good luck.
BUDOS80
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:


Jesus unequivocally states that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood you HAS eternal life, and he WILL raise you (John 6:54). If you are saying that the Eucharist is Jesus' literal flesh and blood, and you can eat his flesh and drink his blood.... but NOT have eternal life and NOT be raised, then you are directly contradicting what Jesus declares to be true.


You are assuming that whoever also means those who do not follow him, an incorrect assumption. The early church guarded communion so closely that non members were dismissed before communion was served. You are also inserting the word "once" into his statement. You have eternal life so long as you continue in the partaking. You partake unworthily and may be damned. You stop partaking, you starve to death (spiritually) just as if you would physically if you stopped eating and drinking. You are also assuming "where" - with Him in heaven. If you make a practice of partaking unworthily, you may just be raised up on the last day only to be given a boarding pass to the lake of fire where the worm dieth not.

Those are a whole lot of bad assumptions. This isn't rocket science, but is illustrative of what happens when you try and reverse engineer Christianity from Bible verses without knowing your family's history.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saint Gabriel, the New Confessor and Fool for Christ
(1929-1995, Republic of Georgia)

The Arena: Reflection | Burning Lenin's Portrait

Episode webpage: https://www.spreaker.com/episode/reflection-burning-lenin-s-portrait--61254220

Media file: https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/61254220/vlog_burning_lenins_portrait.mp3

https://monkgabriel.ge/eng/life.htm

"Archimandrite Gabriel, born Goderdzi Urgebadze, is one of the most renowned Orthodox monks in Georgia. He was born to Vasili and Barbara Urgebadze on 26 August 1929 in Tbilisi, Georgia. He was baptized as an infant in St. Martyr Barbara's Church in the Navtlughi district by the former "Sister of Mercy," Tamar Begiashvili. The communist regime was fiercely violent during that time; religion was persecuted, churches were destroyed and closed, and innocent people were murdered and deported. Goderdzi was about two years old when his father, Vasil Urgebadze, was murdered under uncertain circumstances. After that, his family members called him Vasiko in honor of his father..."
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

Perhaps, although so far you have received multiple answers, not just responses to your question, yet you miss it due to that log in your eye.

IF one believes that "once saved always saved" is true, they are wrong. If one becomes a believer and is saved, then falls away, fails to again seek forgiveness and repent, then he can expect to go to hell. However, we are living by our interpretation of the Bible and whichever translation/translations we have accepted. Now, in the instance you seem so caught up on, I answered it. You failed to see it. That is your problem; well at least part of your problem. Hopefully you are seeing someone to helpl you with your issues, and I am not trying to be cute.
In your responses, ask yourself WWJD as you go back and review them. You seem to be seeking a specific response and be damned with the rest. Good luck.
No, you only answered OldBear's question regarding his scenario. I repeated the question in a broader, general sense, where the sinner isn't one who has "fallen away" but is still a true believer who makes a mistake, and you did not answer it. Further, I didn't ask just that one question. The other question I asked, you did not answer as well. Here is a repost:

"It isn't a conversation if you won't answer questions. Can we start there? If a true believer commits a sin and dies before he can repent/ask for forgiveness, does he go to hell? And do you agree that your view you stated earlier about being judged by Jesus is wrong according to John 5:4?"

I am not looking for a specific response. I am looking for A response that actually and directly answers my question.

So who's got the log in their eye?
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:


Jesus unequivocally states that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood you HAS eternal life, and he WILL raise you (John 6:54). If you are saying that the Eucharist is Jesus' literal flesh and blood, and you can eat his flesh and drink his blood.... but NOT have eternal life and NOT be raised, then you are directly contradicting what Jesus declares to be true.


You are assuming that whoever also means those who do not follow him, an incorrect assumption. The early church guarded communion so closely that non members were dismissed before communion was served. You are also inserting the word "once" into his statement. You have eternal life so long as you continue in the partaking. You partake unworthily and may be damned. You stop partaking, you starve to death (spiritually) just as if you would physically if you stopped eating and drinking. You are also assuming "where" - with Him in heaven. If you make a practice of partaking unworthily, you may just be raised up on the last day only to be given a boarding pass to the lake of fire where the worm dieth not.

Those are a whole lot of bad assumptions. This isn't rocket science, but is illustrative of what happens when you try and reverse engineer Christianity from Bible verses without knowing your family's history.
"Whoever" means whoever. You are limiting Jesus' words if you downgrade that to "whoever fits a certain criteria".

You also can NOT "have" eternal life as Jesus directly says of those who eat his flesh, and then lose it. Because if you lose it and die, then you never had eternal life to begin with. That would make Jesus' words false.

Think about it: if Jesus declares that you HAVE eternal life, it means your life at that moment is ETERNAL. You can NOT EVER lose this eternal life, because if you did it would mean your life will end at some point, which would mean that your life wasn't eternal as Jesus had declared. Jesus would be in error.

The verse is direct and clear. You are the one inserting bad assumptions in the form of your own qualifiers. The situation is this: either Jesus is wrong, Paul is wrong, or you are wrong with your literal interpretation of John 6.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

I am always afraid of the words 'true believer'.
no reason to be afraid..

https://www.biblestudytools.com/deuteronomy/31-6.html
'True believer' means someone like you is doing the judging by a standard you choose.
As commonly used, 'true believer' is a bit like 'True Scotsman', a fallacy used to justify an assumption.
"True believer" simply means someone who truly believes.

It doesn't have to be this difficult. You don't have to keep looking at everything through a lens where the person has bad motivations.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

I am always afraid of the words 'true believer'.
no reason to be afraid..

https://www.biblestudytools.com/deuteronomy/31-6.html
'True believer' means someone like you is doing the judging by a standard you choose.
As commonly used, 'true believer' is a bit like 'True Scotsman', a fallacy used to justify an assumption.
"True believer" simply means someone who truly believes.

It doesn't have to be this difficult. You don't have to keep looking at everything through a lens where the person has bad motivations.
And when someone thinks they truly believe and don't have any duty?

Who among humans can say whether someone is or is not a 'true believer'?

As I said, it's a fallacy, and a dangerous one, which is why Jesus warned against such assumption.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

I am always afraid of the words 'true believer'.
no reason to be afraid..

https://www.biblestudytools.com/deuteronomy/31-6.html
'True believer' means someone like you is doing the judging by a standard you choose.
As commonly used, 'true believer' is a bit like 'True Scotsman', a fallacy used to justify an assumption.
"True believer" simply means someone who truly believes.

It doesn't have to be this difficult. You don't have to keep looking at everything through a lens where the person has bad motivations.
And when someone thinks they truly believe and don't have any duty?

Who among humans can say whether someone is or is not a 'true believer'?

As I said, it's a fallacy, and a dangerous one, which is why Jesus warned against such assumption.
"True believer" is not a fallacy. You don't know what a fallacy is.

If someone "thinks" they are a true believer, but they really aren't, then they aren't a true believer. This isn't difficult.

This isn't about whether other humans can determine if someone is a true believer or not. It's about whether someone is a true believer or not. Stop making this so difficult, and learn what it means to be fallacy.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Again, whatever makes you so angry, I hope you find peace.

BUDOS, Coke Bear, I look forward to continuing our conversation.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Again, whatever makes you so angry, I hope you find peace.

BUDOS, Coke Bear, I look forward to continuing our conversation.
You don't need to continually lash out as a defense mechanism for being wrong. Just accept it and move on.

What makes me angry is when truth, especially the gospel, isn't upheld, but is rather distorted, hidden, or denied. It also makes me sad. I find peace when this is corrected. This should be true for all Christians.
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If a person has been a believer, sins, and then dies, neither you nor anyone can know whether or not he goes to heaven or hell. When the believer's book of life is read, then Jesus Christ decides, as noted in Revelation. Whatever His decision is it will be just.

As you know, the Bible is not all black and white. Additionally, and in many cases unfortunately, we have primary access to the English translations. We miss some context and meaning as a result, and even more by not knowing how His words were interpreted within the Jewish tradition and lifestyle.

BUDOS80
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

If a person has been a believer, sins, and then dies, neither you nor anyone can know whether or not he goes to heaven or hell. When the believer's book of life is read, then Jesus Christ decides, as noted in Revelation. Whatever His decision is it will be just.

As you know, the Bible is not all black and white. Additionally, and in many cases unfortunately, we have primary access to the English translations. We miss some context and meaning as a result, and even more by not knowing how His words were interpreted within the Jewish tradition and lifestyle.

Notice you said "HAS BEEN a believer". That isn't the question. This is precisely why I repeated my question, and wanted you to answer it.

The question was if the person "IS" a believer. Just because a Christian sins, which EVERY Christian that has ever existed has done, it doesn't mean they aren't a believer any more.

What is your answer now to the question? And the other question you still not have answered about John 5:24?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am not the one 'lashing out'.

And the cause of your anger is not what you say, I think.

I am not engaging you further, BTD, because of your constant rage.

I do hope you will feel better, and have prayed for that outcome for you.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

I am not the one 'lashing out'.

And the cause of your anger is not what you say, I think.

I am not engaging you further, BTD, because of your constant rage.

I do hope you will feel better, and have prayed for that outcome for you.
This isn't rage. You are constantly projecting your own feelings and behavior onto others.

You aren't engaging me, because you are afraid you are wrong. Also because you don't want me to be right out of spite. If you had the truth, you would easily give me answers, but instead you run and hide from the question, and then you play the victim from the "holier than thou" standpoint. This has been your pattern the ENTIRE thread. This is not the behavior of someone in the truth or someone who cares about the truth being upheld.

If your prayer does get answered, it would mean that you would finally stop your defense mechanisms and face the questions with the heart of getting to the truth. Because only then will I "feel better" about you.
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Change "was" to "is".
BUDOS80
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

Change "was" to "is".
Then what you are saying is most definitely NOT the gospel.

If a true believer can sin, which is what every true believer in history has done, and that sin can send them tumbling to hell, then the true believer is still under the power of sin and death just as any unbeliever - Jesus would have defeated nothing through his death and resurrection. We would be still dependent on our own righteousness and merit for salvation, instead of being imputed the righteousness of Jesus by grace as a gift of God, through faith, as God promised in His word. It would falsify Jesus' own words, and falsify the word of his apostles in the New Testament.
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm going to go away now and join the others. There's coming a time and place in the future when I turn around and find us both surprised yet grateful. Peace brother.
BUDOS80
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

There's coming a time and place in the future when I turn around and find us both surprised yet grateful. Peace brother.
I'm not sure what that means, but in the meantime it isn't very wise to trust that hope on an understanding that conflicts with the gospel in God's word.
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS80
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:


Jesus unequivocally states that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood you HAS eternal life, and he WILL raise you (John 6:54). If you are saying that the Eucharist is Jesus' literal flesh and blood, and you can eat his flesh and drink his blood.... but NOT have eternal life and NOT be raised, then you are directly contradicting what Jesus declares to be true.


You are assuming that whoever also means those who do not follow him, an incorrect assumption. The early church guarded communion so closely that non members were dismissed before communion was served. You are also inserting the word "once" into his statement. You have eternal life so long as you continue in the partaking. You partake unworthily and may be damned. You stop partaking, you starve to death (spiritually) just as if you would physically if you stopped eating and drinking. You are also assuming "where" - with Him in heaven. If you make a practice of partaking unworthily, you may just be raised up on the last day only to be given a boarding pass to the lake of fire where the worm dieth not.

Those are a whole lot of bad assumptions. This isn't rocket science, but is illustrative of what happens when you try and reverse engineer Christianity from Bible verses without knowing your family's history.
Communion is a means to grace for disciples and non-disciples. The table belongs to God not the church and God welcomes all to Jesus' meal.
Waco1947 ,la
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Realitybites said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:


Jesus unequivocally states that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood you HAS eternal life, and he WILL raise you (John 6:54). If you are saying that the Eucharist is Jesus' literal flesh and blood, and you can eat his flesh and drink his blood.... but NOT have eternal life and NOT be raised, then you are directly contradicting what Jesus declares to be true.


You are assuming that whoever also means those who do not follow him, an incorrect assumption. The early church guarded communion so closely that non members were dismissed before communion was served. You are also inserting the word "once" into his statement. You have eternal life so long as you continue in the partaking. You partake unworthily and may be damned. You stop partaking, you starve to death (spiritually) just as if you would physically if you stopped eating and drinking. You are also assuming "where" - with Him in heaven. If you make a practice of partaking unworthily, you may just be raised up on the last day only to be given a boarding pass to the lake of fire where the worm dieth not.

Those are a whole lot of bad assumptions. This isn't rocket science, but is illustrative of what happens when you try and reverse engineer Christianity from Bible verses without knowing your family's history.
Communion is a means to grace for disciples and non-disciples. The table belongs to God not the church and God welcomes all to Jesus' meal.
Faith is the means to grace. Communion is for the body of believers with that faith. You are correct that God welcomes all to Jesus' meal... but many refuse to come. And some come, but on their own terms, without wearing the required covering (Matthew 22:11-14). Those who put their trust on their own merits or who believe in a false Jesus and/or false gospel (such as believing in a non-supernatural, non-Creator God and an allegorical Jesus who didn't really physically rise from the dead - what you believe) are the ones who are trying to get in the feast wearing what they want instead of what has been provided. Jesus tells us that these people will be cast out.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well said.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Waco1947 said:

Realitybites said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:


Jesus unequivocally states that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood you HAS eternal life, and he WILL raise you (John 6:54). If you are saying that the Eucharist is Jesus' literal flesh and blood, and you can eat his flesh and drink his blood.... but NOT have eternal life and NOT be raised, then you are directly contradicting what Jesus declares to be true.


You are assuming that whoever also means those who do not follow him, an incorrect assumption. The early church guarded communion so closely that non members were dismissed before communion was served. You are also inserting the word "once" into his statement. You have eternal life so long as you continue in the partaking. You partake unworthily and may be damned. You stop partaking, you starve to death (spiritually) just as if you would physically if you stopped eating and drinking. You are also assuming "where" - with Him in heaven. If you make a practice of partaking unworthily, you may just be raised up on the last day only to be given a boarding pass to the lake of fire where the worm dieth not.

Those are a whole lot of bad assumptions. This isn't rocket science, but is illustrative of what happens when you try and reverse engineer Christianity from Bible verses without knowing your family's history.
Communion is a means to grace for disciples and non-disciples. The table belongs to God not the church and God welcomes all to Jesus' meal.
Faith is the means to grace. Communion is for the body of believers with that faith. You are correct that God welcomes all to Jesus' meal... but many refuse to come. And some come, but on their own terms, without wearing the required covering (Matthew 22:11-14). Those who put their trust on their own merits or who believe in a false Jesus and/or false gospel (such as believing in a non-supernatural, non-Creator God and an allegorical Jesus who didn't really physically rise from the dead - what you believe) are the ones who are trying to get in the feast wearing what they want instead of what has been provided. Jesus tells us that these people will be cast out.

Luke14: The Parable of the Great Banquet

15 When one of those at the table with him heard this, he said to Jesus, "Blessed is the one who will eat at the feast in the kingdom of God."

16 Jesus replied: "A certain man was preparing a great banquet and invited many guests. 17 At the time of the banquet he sent his servant to tell those who had been invited, 'Come, for everything is now ready.'

18 "But they all alike began to make excuses. The first said, 'I have just bought a field, and I must go and see it. Please excuse me.'

19 "Another said, 'I have just bought five yoke of oxen, and I'm on my way to try them out. Please excuse me.'

20 "Still another said, 'I just got married, so I can't come.'

21 "The servant came back and reported this to his master. Then the owner of the house became angry and ordered his servant, 'Go out quickly into the streets and alleys of the town and bring in the poor, the crippled, the blind and the lame.'

22 "'Sir,' the servant said, 'what you ordered has been done, but there is still room.'

23 "Then the master told his servant, 'Go out to the roads and country lanes and compel them to come in, so that my house will be full. 24 I tell you, not one of those who were invited will get a taste of my banquet.'"
God's table open to all
Waco1947 ,la
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Waco1947 said:

Realitybites said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:


Jesus unequivocally states that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood you HAS eternal life, and he WILL raise you (John 6:54). If you are saying that the Eucharist is Jesus' literal flesh and blood, and you can eat his flesh and drink his blood.... but NOT have eternal life and NOT be raised, then you are directly contradicting what Jesus declares to be true.


You are assuming that whoever also means those who do not follow him, an incorrect assumption. The early church guarded communion so closely that non members were dismissed before communion was served. You are also inserting the word "once" into his statement. You have eternal life so long as you continue in the partaking. You partake unworthily and may be damned. You stop partaking, you starve to death (spiritually) just as if you would physically if you stopped eating and drinking. You are also assuming "where" - with Him in heaven. If you make a practice of partaking unworthily, you may just be raised up on the last day only to be given a boarding pass to the lake of fire where the worm dieth not.

Those are a whole lot of bad assumptions. This isn't rocket science, but is illustrative of what happens when you try and reverse engineer Christianity from Bible verses without knowing your family's history.
Communion is a means to grace for disciples and non-disciples. The table belongs to God not the church and God welcomes all to Jesus' meal.
Faith is the means to grace. Communion is for the body of believers with that faith. You are correct that God welcomes all to Jesus' meal... but many refuse to come. And some come, but on their own terms, without wearing the required covering (Matthew 22:11-14). Those who put their trust on their own merits or who believe in a false Jesus and/or false gospel (such as believing in a non-supernatural, non-Creator God and an allegorical Jesus who didn't really physically rise from the dead - what you believe) are the ones who are trying to get in the feast wearing what they want instead of what has been provided. Jesus tells us that these people will be cast out.

Luke14: The Parable of the Great Banquet

15 When one of those at the table with him heard this, he said to Jesus, "Blessed is the one who will eat at the feast in the kingdom of God."

16 Jesus replied: "A certain man was preparing a great banquet and invited many guests. 17 At the time of the banquet he sent his servant to tell those who had been invited, 'Come, for everything is now ready.'

18 "But they all alike began to make excuses. The first said, 'I have just bought a field, and I must go and see it. Please excuse me.'

19 "Another said, 'I have just bought five yoke of oxen, and I'm on my way to try them out. Please excuse me.'

20 "Still another said, 'I just got married, so I can't come.'

21 "The servant came back and reported this to his master. Then the owner of the house became angry and ordered his servant, 'Go out quickly into the streets and alleys of the town and bring in the poor, the crippled, the blind and the lame.'

22 "'Sir,' the servant said, 'what you ordered has been done, but there is still room.'

23 "Then the master told his servant, 'Go out to the roads and country lanes and compel them to come in, so that my house will be full. 24 I tell you, not one of those who were invited will get a taste of my banquet.'"
God's table open to all
Now read the continuation of that parable in Matthew 22:

**************

"Then he said to his servants, 'The wedding feast is ready, but those invited were not worthy. Go therefore to the main roads and invite to the wedding feast as many as you find.' And those servants went out into the roads and gathered all whom they found, both bad and good. So the wedding hall was filled with guests.

"But when the king came in to look at the guests, he saw there a man who had no wedding garment. And he said to him, 'Friend, how did you get in here without a wedding garment?' And he was speechless. Then the king said to the attendants, 'Bind him hand and foot and cast him into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.' For many are called, but few are chosen."


**************

Yes, as I had agreed, God's table is open to all.
But those who come wearing their own righteousness/false Jesus will be cast out.
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Realitybites said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:


Jesus unequivocally states that whoever eats his flesh and drinks his blood you HAS eternal life, and he WILL raise you (John 6:54). If you are saying that the Eucharist is Jesus' literal flesh and blood, and you can eat his flesh and drink his blood.... but NOT have eternal life and NOT be raised, then you are directly contradicting what Jesus declares to be true.


You are assuming that whoever also means those who do not follow him, an incorrect assumption. The early church guarded communion so closely that non members were dismissed before communion was served. You are also inserting the word "once" into his statement. You have eternal life so long as you continue in the partaking. You partake unworthily and may be damned. You stop partaking, you starve to death (spiritually) just as if you would physically if you stopped eating and drinking. You are also assuming "where" - with Him in heaven. If you make a practice of partaking unworthily, you may just be raised up on the last day only to be given a boarding pass to the lake of fire where the worm dieth not.

Those are a whole lot of bad assumptions. This isn't rocket science, but is illustrative of what happens when you try and reverse engineer Christianity from Bible verses without knowing your family's history.
Communion is a means to grace for disciples and non-disciples. The table belongs to God not the church and God welcomes all to Jesus' meal.


This is false. God only welcomes believers to this table.
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And didn't he come to make and invite all to be believers?

Matthew 9:12-22
On hearing this Jesus said, "It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. But go and learn what this means: 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners."
BUDOS80
xfrodobagginsx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

And didn't he come to make and invite all to be believers?

Matthew 9:12-22
On hearing this Jesus said, "It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. But go and learn what this means: 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners."



Yes. But He only calls true believers to take communion in remembrance of His death, burial and resurrection for their sins.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.