Why Are We in Ukraine?

320,060 Views | 5859 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by whiterock
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

Doc Holliday said:


This guy must moonlight for TASS or Sputnik News.

Again, just because you do not like what someone else is saying...does NOT mean they are getting paid by the big bad russkies
Who needs to be paid when social media allows it to be done for free? We are the ultimate disinformation vehicle because we (fortunately) don't have any guardrails on our speech. But we also live in echo chambers easily manipulated.


BTW, when are one of you going to produce something tangible about the U.S. engineering the Ukraine coup? It would be a nice parting gift to the Nuland resignation.

1.

I doubt its much worse than the mainstream corporate media.

I mean the NY Times denied to the world that Stalin was mass murdering people in the USSR.

The liberals at the Times did not want to give conservatives a win by presenting Uncle Joe Stalin and the socialist's over there in a bad light.

Does not get more "misinformation" than that.

And I'm sure some website can catalogue the endless lies (misinformation) they have told us over the decades.

2.

I don't think if will be easy to get the CIA to disclose to me their secret operations in Eastern Europe.

But I assure you that one day....maybe decades from now...the truth will come out.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

ATL Bear said:

Doc Holliday said:


This guy must moonlight for TASS or Sputnik News.


Take a close look at the US army.


Zero chance it could defeat Russia or China.
If this is in reference to this new era of U.S. soldier, I get your point. As far as battle readiness, I think Russia is proving their own inadequacy, and China has numbers and tech, but haven't been in a real fight in almost 50 years, and even that was limited.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

KaiBear said:

ATL Bear said:

Doc Holliday said:


This guy must moonlight for TASS or Sputnik News.


Take a close look at the US army.


Zero chance it could defeat Russia or China.
If this is in reference to this new era of U.S. soldier, I get your point. As far as battle readiness, I think Russia is proving their own inadequacy, and China has numbers and tech, but haven't been in a real fight in almost 50 years, and even that was limited.

The USA (and its mass alliance network) is so much better armed its not even funny.

They could and would beat anyone on earth.

Russia is a conscript army that can't even take Kyiv.

China has a large army but its designed for internal control.

Most People don't know this but the main purpose of the Chinese army is not actually national defense....its purpose is actually to secure the existence of the Chinese Communist party...national defense comes second.

"the PLA is not a national army of the type of traditional nation-states, but a political army or the armed branch of the CCP itself since its allegiance is to the party only and not the state or any constitution. At present, the CMC chairman is customarily also the CCP general secretary"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army

The real question is not can we beat these countries...but can they hold these countries once beaten (russia, china, iran) these are all larger and much more of a headache than Afghanistan or Iraq.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

Doc Holliday said:


This guy must moonlight for TASS or Sputnik News.

Again, just because you do not like what someone else is saying...does NOT mean they are getting paid by the big bad russkies
Who needs to be paid when social media allows it to be done for free? We are the ultimate disinformation vehicle because we (fortunately) don't have any guardrails on our speech. But we also live in echo chambers easily manipulated.


BTW, when are one of you going to produce something tangible about the U.S. engineering the Ukraine coup? It would be a nice parting gift to the Nuland resignation.

1.

I doubt its much worse than the mainstream corporate media.

I mean the NY Times denied to the world that Stalin was mass murdering people in the USSR.

The liberals at the Times did not want to give conservatives a win by presenting Uncle Joe Stalin and the socialist's over there in a bad light.

Does not get more "misinformation" than that.

And I'm sure some website can catalogue the endless lies (misinformation) they have told us over the decades.

2.

I don't think if will be easy to get the CIA to disclose to me their secret operations in Eastern Europe.

But I assure you that one day....maybe decades from now...the truth will come out.
Different world today. Exposes happen in real time, or nearly, due to the flood of information. That's one of the great challenges of intelligence work today, and why so much effort is in information espionage such as disinformation, psyops, cyber, SIGINT, etc.

A decade later and we'd have smoking guns if it was anything significant. As it were I think the West liked the outcome, and that's not saying we didn't promote the idea of a West aligned Ukraine, but really we were caught flat footed on how Russia responded. Not to mention we stood by as they prepared to culminate in the bigger invasion. The Russians played the long game and we either didn't take it serious or missed it. The Kerch Strait Bridge should have been a big hint
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

KaiBear said:

ATL Bear said:

Doc Holliday said:


This guy must moonlight for TASS or Sputnik News.


Take a close look at the US army.


Zero chance it could defeat Russia or China.
If this is in reference to this new era of U.S. soldier, I get your point. As far as battle readiness, I think Russia is proving their own inadequacy, and China has numbers and tech, but haven't been in a real fight in almost 50 years, and even that was limited.

The USA (and its mass alliance network) is so much better armed its not even funny.

They could and would beat anyone on earth.

Russia is a conscript army that can't even take Kyiv.

China has a large army but its designed for internal control.

People don't know this but the main purpose of the Chinese army is not actually national defense....its purpose is actually to secure the existence of the Chinese Communist party...national defense comes second.

"the PLA is not a national army of the type of traditional nation-states, but a political army or the armed branch of the CCP itself since its allegiance is to the party only and not the state or any constitution. At present, the CMC chairman is customarily also the CCP general secretary"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army

The real question is not can we beat these countries...but can they hold these countries once beaten (russia, china, iran) these are all larger and much more of a headache than Afghanistan or Iraq.
Hey look at this. Completely agree, and you are absolutely correct on your China assessment.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

ATL Bear said:

KaiBear said:

ATL Bear said:

Doc Holliday said:


This guy must moonlight for TASS or Sputnik News.


Take a close look at the US army.


Zero chance it could defeat Russia or China.
If this is in reference to this new era of U.S. soldier, I get your point. As far as battle readiness, I think Russia is proving their own inadequacy, and China has numbers and tech, but haven't been in a real fight in almost 50 years, and even that was limited.

The USA (and its mass alliance network) is so much better armed its not even funny.

They could and would beat anyone on earth.

Russia is a conscript army that can't even take Kyiv.

China has a large army but its designed for internal control.

People don't know this but the main purpose of the Chinese army is not actually national defense....its purpose is actually to secure the existence of the Chinese Communist party...national defense comes second.

"the PLA is not a national army of the type of traditional nation-states, but a political army or the armed branch of the CCP itself since its allegiance is to the party only and not the state or any constitution. At present, the CMC chairman is customarily also the CCP general secretary"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Liberation_Army

The real question is not can we beat these countries...but can they hold these countries once beaten (russia, china, iran) these are all larger and much more of a headache than Afghanistan or Iraq.


Ridiculous

Our army is shorthanded, inexperienced, and possesses obsolete tanks and equipment.

Moral is low and confidence in our commander in chief is non existent

Zero chance the American people would support a ground war with either Russia or China resulting in an immediate collapse of our troops willingness to fight.

This ain't 1945 .

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

KaiBear said:

ATL Bear said:

Doc Holliday said:


This guy must moonlight for TASS or Sputnik News.


Take a close look at the US army.


Zero chance it could defeat Russia or China.
If this is in reference to this new era of U.S. soldier, I get your point. As far as battle readiness, I think Russia is proving their own inadequacy, and China has numbers and tech, but haven't been in a real fight in almost 50 years, and even that was limited.
China has tech on its front line units, but overall is not very modern.

As for defeating Russia or China, after the initial shock. The US will get their feet under them. My biggest concern is that we focused and glorified Spec Ops so much, that we got away from the bread and butter of the Army - Mech Infantry, Artillery and Armor. The Spec Ops and Light Infantry make good movies and are complementary pieces, but cannot take the place of a good Mech Infantry Division in a conventional war.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:



Very jealous of Ukraine for having so many patriots willing to give their life to the country while we have an ever growing number of people wanting to run away from conflict and the first sign of danger.


What is "my country"? Sharing a passport cover and language with people who think there are 66 genders? People who want to import tens of millions of outsiders who speak an alien tongue and worship an alien god? The people they import to replace us and as whiterock admitted to prop up a dying socialist ponzi scheme that runs out of money in half a decade?

Remember that anti pollution advertisement they used to run on TV with an Indian looking around a polluted landscape and crying? They could probably film something similar today with Washington, Jefferson, and Adams looking at American society and governance at large.

"For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ,". Phillipians 3:20

I've always considered myself a "good American", but perhaps I'm not. As an immigrant myself who grew up in the South, perhaps my formation was to be a good unreconstructed Confederate Southerner because what I'm seeing from "America" isn't what I signed up for.

https://russian-faith.com/dixie-russia-what-do-they-have-in-common-n4211

As far as whiterocks' assertion that this latest wave of immigrants is going to overwhelmingly become contributing members of society, I reject that. We came out of appreciation for the ideals of the founders. The current wave is coming to harvest money - free or not - in a stronger fiat currency. The majority of them have no desire to become "American" in any historical sense.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

ron.reagan said:



Very jealous of Ukraine for having so many patriots willing to give their life to the country while we have an ever growing number of people wanting to run away from conflict and the first sign of danger.


Danger is coming to you and all Americans with the admission of MILLIONS of unskilled illegals.

The vast majority of whom are single males.
.



I am genuinely interested in how bringing in millions of unskilled males from the 3rd world makes the U.S. stronger or makes the lives of average Americans better….
If one presumes they will never be deported and are allowed to stay & find private sector employment, then we have 8M extra people paying Social Security taxes, which is a pretty big deal given our demographics and the growth of the entitlement.

That's just for starters. And make no mistake, that is the plan.





I can see that…but what if a majority of them never work?

That would be my question.

For instance in Germany almost 70% of the Syrians they let in still don't have jobs almost a decade later.



worst case? They remain on public assistance, which is a component of GDP = you'll hear bragging about how strong the economy is (the public, broadly, doesn't care much about deficits).

Most migrants will not be content to squat on a govt. check, and in that regard the composition of the migrants are indicative. Note all the verbiage about "military aged males." That is not the typical "ahh...life on public assistance" demographic. The migrant that comes to live on a govt check is, stereotypically, an adult woman of child bearing age.

Lastly and most instructively, the most productive parts of our economy are immigrants. White Americans are very middle of the pack on income distribution. The leaders are all immigrant classes, mostly Asians but the distribution is scattered about the globe more than one might think. (the data is highly inconvenient to the premises of the Social Justice movement.....)

There is a reason elite classes are tolerating this. It IS beneficial, net-net. The concept in Macro 101 is "creative destruction." The trick is to position oneself in the "creative" part rather than the "destruction" part. And right now, the dynamic has simply grown too large to be politically sustainable - too much "creative destruction" happening too fast, destabilizing the political coalitions of the day.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[It is instead an unkind reflection on what Victoria Nuland got up to in all her years of government service. She was one of Dick Cheney's top advisors on Iraq, which went so well for America. She stuck around to work for Obama, and got caught up in the Libya debacle. As State Department spokesman, she sold the administration's line about the need to overthrow Qaddafi for the sake of peace. Libya was left a failed state ruled by warlords, and the chief transit point for vast numbers of migrants leaving Africa for Europe. Nuland, one of the most influential neocons, also worked to try to overthrow the Syrian government.

She is perhaps most notorious for being recorded by Russian spies who intercepted a phone call between her and the then-US Ambassador to Ukraine, over who Washington wanted to run the country after overthrowing its elected pro-Russian president. Click here to go to this tweet below and listen to the audio:

In the recording, she is heard to say, "Fk the EU." Madame Merkel was unhappy with that. Nuland left government rather than work with the icky Donald Trump, but Joe Biden brought her back in, where she has been the No. 3 US diplomat, and has worked her backside off managing US support for Ukraine in its war with Russia. You can't blame the Ukrainians for defending their country from invasion, but let us not that the war which could have ended in 2022 with a peace settlement, if Boris Johnson hadn't undertaken a mission to scuttle it has eliminated a generation of Ukrainian men, and sent vast numbers of Ukrainians into an exile from which they will not return.
Nuland is the face of Washington's support for "Color Revolutions" seemingly spontaneous uprisings against governments disfavored by Washington. Not long ago I was giving a Washingtonian new to Hungary the layout of the local scene, and mentioned how much resentment many Hungarians have against the US Government for its aggressive role in trying to undermine and even overthrow the elected government of this country. I told him about USAID chief Samantha Power's coming to Budapest a year ago bearing millions of dollars to aid groups in "democracy" advocacy. People here aren't stupid, I told him; they know this is money Washington is spreading around to left-wing groups to seed a Color Revolution.
The guy got it, saying, "Whenever Victoria Nuland or Samantha Power show up in your country, bad things follow."

Now Nuland is going away, no doubt to a well-paid sinecure at Brookings or some other think tank. There is no single figure who is more fully the face of the forever-war foreign policy blob than Nuland, a neocon who served in both Republican and Democratic administrations, always pushing for more war and more US hegemony. Thanks in part to her, the United States faces a Cold War not only with Russia, but with China, at just the point where we are deeply in debt, cannot recruit soldiers to replenish our ranks, and have reduced manufacturing capacity for arms and armaments.

Serving in the foreign policy sector of the US Government in this new American century means never having to say you're sorry. Anyway, the before and after images of Nuland shows what decades of doing government dirty work will do to you.] -Rod Dreher

Bear8084
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

ron.reagan said:



Very jealous of Ukraine for having so many patriots willing to give their life to the country while we have an ever growing number of people wanting to run away from conflict and the first sign of danger.


What is "my country"? Sharing a passport cover and language with people who think there are 66 genders? People who want to import tens of millions of outsiders who speak an alien tongue and worship an alien god? The people they import to replace us and as whiterock admitted to prop up a dying socialist ponzi scheme that runs out of money in half a decade?

Remember that anti pollution advertisement they used to run on TV with an Indian looking around a polluted landscape and crying? They could probably film something similar today with Washington, Jefferson, and Adams looking at American society and governance at large.

"For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ,". Phillipians 3:20

I've always considered myself a "good American", but perhaps I'm not. As an immigrant myself who grew up in the South, perhaps I my formation was to be a good unreconstructed Confederate Southerner because what I'm seeing from "America" isn't what I signed up for.

https://russian-faith.com/dixie-russia-what-do-they-have-in-common-n4211

As far as whiterocks' assertion that this latest wave of immigrants is going to overwhelmingly become contributing members of society, I reject that. We came out of appreciation for the ideals of the founders. The current wave is coming to harvest money - free or not - in a stronger fiat currency. The majority of them have no desire to become "American" in any historical sense.



Lol doesn't even try to hide the Russian BS anymore.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear8084 said:

Realitybites said:

ron.reagan said:



Very jealous of Ukraine for having so many patriots willing to give their life to the country while we have an ever growing number of people wanting to run away from conflict and the first sign of danger.


What is "my country"? Sharing a passport cover and language with people who think there are 66 genders? People who want to import tens of millions of outsiders who speak an alien tongue and worship an alien god? The people they import to replace us and as whiterock admitted to prop up a dying socialist ponzi scheme that runs out of money in half a decade?

Remember that anti pollution advertisement they used to run on TV with an Indian looking around a polluted landscape and crying? They could probably film something similar today with Washington, Jefferson, and Adams looking at American society and governance at large.

"For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ,". Phillipians 3:20

I've always considered myself a "good American", but perhaps I'm not. As an immigrant myself who grew up in the South, perhaps I my formation was to be a good unreconstructed Confederate Southerner because what I'm seeing from "America" isn't what I signed up for.

https://russian-faith.com/dixie-russia-what-do-they-have-in-common-n4211

As far as whiterocks' assertion that this latest wave of immigrants is going to overwhelmingly become contributing members of society, I reject that. We came out of appreciation for the ideals of the founders. The current wave is coming to harvest money - free or not - in a stronger fiat currency. The majority of them have no desire to become "American" in any historical sense.



Lol doesn't even try to hide the Russian BS anymore.

Russia does not know what an unreconstructed Southern is and would not understand the concept.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:


I'm not the biggest critic of Nuland. She's not making the policy. She's executing it. But that picture reminds of a certain movie character.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

ron.reagan said:



Very jealous of Ukraine for having so many patriots willing to give their life to the country while we have an ever growing number of people wanting to run away from conflict and the first sign of danger.


Danger is coming to you and all Americans with the admission of MILLIONS of unskilled illegals.

The vast majority of whom are single males.
.



I am genuinely interested in how bringing in millions of unskilled males from the 3rd world makes the U.S. stronger or makes the lives of average Americans better….
If one presumes they will never be deported and are allowed to stay & find private sector employment, then we have 8M extra people paying Social Security taxes, which is a pretty big deal given our demographics and the growth of the entitlement.

That's just for starters. And make no mistake, that is the plan.





I can see that…but what if a majority of them never work?

That would be my question.

For instance in Germany almost 70% of the Syrians they let in still don't have jobs almost a decade later.



worst case? They remain on public assistance, which is a component of GDP = you'll hear bragging about how strong the economy is (the public, broadly, doesn't care much about deficits).

Most migrants will not be content to squat on a govt. check, and in that regard the composition of the migrants are indicative. Note all the verbiage about "military aged males." That is not the typical "ahh...life on public assistance" demographic. The migrant that comes to live on a govt check is, stereotypically, an adult woman of child bearing age.

Lastly and most instructively, the most productive parts of our economy are immigrants. White Americans are very middle of the pack on income distribution. The leaders are all immigrant classes, mostly Asians but the distribution is scattered about the globe more than one might think. (the data is highly inconvenient to the premises of the Social Justice movement.....)

There is a reason elite classes are tolerating this. It IS beneficial, net-net. The concept in Macro 101 is "creative destruction." .


whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

whiterock said:

Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

ron.reagan said:



Very jealous of Ukraine for having so many patriots willing to give their life to the country while we have an ever growing number of people wanting to run away from conflict and the first sign of danger.


Danger is coming to you and all Americans with the admission of MILLIONS of unskilled illegals.

The vast majority of whom are single males.
.



I am genuinely interested in how bringing in millions of unskilled males from the 3rd world makes the U.S. stronger or makes the lives of average Americans better….
If one presumes they will never be deported and are allowed to stay & find private sector employment, then we have 8M extra people paying Social Security taxes, which is a pretty big deal given our demographics and the growth of the entitlement.

That's just for starters. And make no mistake, that is the plan.





I can see that…but what if a majority of them never work?

That would be my question.

For instance in Germany almost 70% of the Syrians they let in still don't have jobs almost a decade later.



worst case? They remain on public assistance, which is a component of GDP = you'll hear bragging about how strong the economy is (the public, broadly, doesn't care much about deficits).

Most migrants will not be content to squat on a govt. check, and in that regard the composition of the migrants are indicative. Note all the verbiage about "military aged males." That is not the typical "ahh...life on public assistance" demographic. The migrant that comes to live on a govt check is, stereotypically, an adult woman of child bearing age.

Lastly and most instructively, the most productive parts of our economy are immigrants. White Americans are very middle of the pack on income distribution. The leaders are all immigrant classes, mostly Asians but the distribution is scattered about the globe more than one might think. (the data is highly inconvenient to the premises of the Social Justice movement.....)

There is a reason elite classes are tolerating this. It IS beneficial, net-net. The concept in Macro 101 is "creative destruction." .



That may be the case for the Dutch system, partly due to differences in the structure of their welfare state and partly due to difficulties of assimilating muslim migrants. We don't have that latter problem at all. (Yet.)

That is not the set of facts we are dealing with. Hispanic migrants in particular are workhorses, and we do have quite a shortage of unskilled labor. So the dynamic is that we hire folks at $15-18/hr for semi-skilled labor jobs and they start paying into SS immediately, but not withdrawing for 40 years or more. Do 8m times $50k times 15% and that's the MINIMUM revenue to be gained. The baby boomers are all in the system now, so the demand will slack off, but those 8m new migrants are going to breed, offsetting the declining birth rate of existing citizens.

You are not thinking this thru.....
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

There is a reason elite classes are tolerating this. It IS beneficial, net-net. The concept in Macro 101 is "creative destruction." .


Creative destruction is an economic concept. Creative destruction of society ends up destroying the nation.

Quote:

That is not the set of facts we are dealing with. Hispanic migrants in particular are workhorses, and we do have quite a shortage of unskilled labor. So the dynamic is that we hire folks at $15-18/hr for semi-skilled labor jobs and they start paying into SS immediately, but not withdrawing for 40 years or more. Do 8m times $50k times 15% and that's the MINIMUM revenue to be gained. The baby boomers are all in the system now, so the demand will slack off, but those 8m new migrants are going to breed, offsetting the declining birth rate of existing citizens.

You are not thinking this thru.....


Someone earning $15 an hour is making 28,080 a year, not 50k. They basically have free health insurance through the Obamacare marketplace. If they have a kid, throw CHIP benefits on there. If that kid keverages DEI policies to get into college, fafsa grants kick in. Their entire existence is subsidized in our economy.

Birth rate isn't just a number. People are not widgets. It is important that the people of a nation are culturally inculcated towards their homeland. Replacing America's native population with Spanish speaking immigrants from low trust societies south of the border isn't the solution to a math problem.

Quote:

partly due to difficulties of assimilating muslim migrants. We don't have that latter problem at all.


Visit Dearborn or Hamatrack Michigan sometime. For that matter, just go to the Walmart in Irving some evening. (Not Friday).
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

whiterock said:

There is a reason elite classes are tolerating this. It IS beneficial, net-net. The concept in Macro 101 is "creative destruction." .


Creative destruction is an economic concept. Creative destruction of society ends up destroying the nation.
I agree with the first sentence. The second one is quite a bit too broad. For sure, too much creative destruction is POLITICALLY destabilizing. so many examples throughout history.
Quote:

That is not the set of facts we are dealing with. Hispanic migrants in particular are workhorses, and we do have quite a shortage of unskilled labor. So the dynamic is that we hire folks at $15-18/hr for semi-skilled labor jobs and they start paying into SS immediately, but not withdrawing for 40 years or more. Do 8m times $50k times 15% and that's the MINIMUM revenue to be gained. The baby boomers are all in the system now, so the demand will slack off, but those 8m new migrants are going to breed, offsetting the declining birth rate of existing citizens.

You are not thinking this thru.....


Someone earning $15 an hour is making 28,080 a year, not 50k. They basically have free health insurance through the Obamacare marketplace. If they have a kid, throw CHIP benefits on there. If that kid keverages DEI policies to get into college, fafsa grants kick in. Their entire existence is subsidized in our economy.
Try hiring day labor for less than $12/hr. Try getting a brick laid for less than $25/hr. The helpers are making nearly that. A hard working illegal with rudimentary english skills and intelligence able to operate any kind of simple machinery (tractor, backhoe, etc...) at all will be making $30-40k in 12-24 months. 1st & 2nd level supervisory jobs will be $50k. Have a close friend in scrap metal business (17 yards over 4 states & Mexico...not a small business....). Told me two weekends ago in a discussion about this very topic that he could increase his business by 20-25% if he could find enough labor to fill all the empty positions.....positions with benefits, and pay the kinds of wages I mentioned above.
There is a critical shortage of labor for jobs that require people to sweat to make a living.


Birth rate isn't just a number. People are not widgets. It is important that the people of a nation are culturally inculcated towards their homeland. Replacing America's native population with Spanish speaking immigrants from low trust societies south of the border isn't the solution to a math problem.
Yes, birthrate is a number. And in macro-economics, people are widgets. The bodies to grow the economy have to come from somewhere. Indeed, what we're seeing in the demographics of the current flows suggests we've mostly drained Mexico, are nearing the end of Central America, and are dragging ever increasing numbers of people from all over the world.


Quote:

partly due to difficulties of assimilating muslim migrants. We don't have that latter problem at all.


Visit Dearborn or Hamatrack Michigan sometime. For that matter, just go to the Walmart in Irving some evening. (Not Friday).
LOL I live in a suburb which does not have a white majority population.... Can you say the same?
None of what I've said above means the attendant social costs and political destabilization to our communities are irrelevant..... I've argued the opposite here often. But to be effective, you have to deal with realities. And the realities are, a declining birth rate creates labor shortages which cannot be ignored. It affects tax base, which affects the ability to maintain EXISTING infrastructure, much less build new infrastructure. We are dealing with that problem in the worst possible way - ignoring law and letting people walk into the country. We have to stop that. Rule of law is the most important part of a civil society. But we also have to deal with the labor problem.....

Trump is going to talk big about mass deportations. And there will be a dramatic increase in them, statistically, but the numbers will be quite small percentages of what crossed over under Biden. Most are not going home. Best we can hope for is to stop the inflow at the border and deport the lawbreakers. The logistics of deportation proceedings for 8m illegals? There are not enough judges and lawyers and courtrooms to make a dent in that. We only have 2m jail cells in this country at all levels of jurisdiction.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok, this is something I can go with. Actually, I think it should have been this way the whole time.

Credit where credit is due, Trump has a good idea here.

Trump has suggested a workable and novel way to help Ukraine. Let's consider it (msn.com)
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:


Trump is going to talk big about mass deportations. And there will be a dramatic increase in them, statistically, but the numbers will be quite small percentages of what crossed over under Biden. Most are not going home. Best we can hope for is to stop the inflow at the border and deport the lawbreakers. The logistics of deportation proceedings for 8m illegals? There are not enough judges and lawyers and courtrooms to make a dent in that. We only have 2m jail cells in this country at all levels of jurisdiction.

Where there is a will, there is a way.

Operation *******: "In June, command teams of 12 Border Patrol agents, buses, planes, and temporary processing stations began locating, processing, and deporting Mexicans who had illegally entered the United States. A total of 750 immigration and border patrol officers and investigators; 300 jeeps, cars and buses; and seven airplanes were allocated for the operation. Teams were focused on quick processing, as planes were able to coordinate with ground efforts and quickly deport people into Mexico. Those deported were handed off to Mexican officials, who in turn moved them into central Mexico where there were many labor opportunities. While the operation included the cities of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Chicago, its main targets were border areas in Texas and California.

Overall, there were 1,074,277 "returns", defined as "confirmed movement of an inadmissible or deportable alien out of the United States not based on an order of removal" in the first year of Operation *******."

That was with 1954 technology. So its completely doable. The problem is that all democrats and establishment republicans want them here; the former to form a permanent dependency class to replace the native population and give them permanent political power and the latter to artificially subsidize the labor market they participate in. Both are willing to destroy the country in pursuit of these goals.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

whiterock said:


Trump is going to talk big about mass deportations. And there will be a dramatic increase in them, statistically, but the numbers will be quite small percentages of what crossed over under Biden. Most are not going home. Best we can hope for is to stop the inflow at the border and deport the lawbreakers. The logistics of deportation proceedings for 8m illegals? There are not enough judges and lawyers and courtrooms to make a dent in that. We only have 2m jail cells in this country at all levels of jurisdiction.

Where there is a will, there is a way.

Operation *******: "In June, command teams of 12 Border Patrol agents, buses, planes, and temporary processing stations began locating, processing, and deporting Mexicans who had illegally entered the United States. A total of 750 immigration and border patrol officers and investigators; 300 jeeps, cars and buses; and seven airplanes were allocated for the operation. Teams were focused on quick processing, as planes were able to coordinate with ground efforts and quickly deport people into Mexico. Those deported were handed off to Mexican officials, who in turn moved them into central Mexico where there were many labor opportunities. While the operation included the cities of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Chicago, its main targets were border areas in Texas and California.

Overall, there were 1,074,277 "returns", defined as "confirmed movement of an inadmissible or deportable alien out of the United States not based on an order of removal" in the first year of Operation *******."

That was with 1954 technology. So its completely doable. The problem is that all democrats and establishment republicans want them here; the former to form a permanent dependency class to replace the native population and give them permanent political power and the latter to artificially subsidize the labor market they participate in. Both are willing to destroy the country in pursuit of these goals.

the coalition who wants them here is somewhat broader than you describe.

I doubt very much that Trump will eat the illegal immigration elephant the way you describe. He is going to focus first on stopping the illegal crossings. That is the only sensible solution. 1) Makes no sense to start deporting if you don't stop the flow, as the deported will return. 2) The illegal flow is visible and documentable, so you can demonstrate data-proven success immediately). 3) Immediate success on illegal crossings, or which there is a very large governing majority, will reduce the pressure to execute on mass deportations (for which there is A) a far smaller coalition of support and B) far more political risk for either i) bad outcomes in enforcement (an accidentally deported citizen, for example) or ii) political spin-meistering of every step along the way (kids in cages, etc....) 4) success on illegal crossings will also have indirect benefit to the deportation process by causing some self-deportation (choosing voluntary departure over deportation, which has legal benefit to illegals wanting to naturalize), and some inadvertent deportation to occur (leaving the country without realizing they might not be able to come back) among illegals as well as green-card holders.

Remember: Deportation involves an adversarial court proceeding. There is a defendant with a lawyer IN court. So count up the number of immigration judges and courtrooms, then factor in the number of jail cells (2m total all levels of jurisdiction) to hold those arrested. I suspect we do not have the industrial capacity to deport 7-digits of illegals in a 4-year presidential term. At that point, #2 above is instructive.

When the sheriff calls you and says there are cows out on the road in front of your farm, the FIRST thing you do is find the spot in the fence where they got out and fix it. THEN you go open the gate nearest to them and drive them back into your pasture. If you don't do it in that order, the sheriff will be calling you back.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

bad outcomes in enforcement (an accidentally deported citizen, for example)


If by bad outcomes you mean that an MS13 member has a shootout with DHS that kills his girlfriend and anchor babies creating a PR data point that the left and MSM can use like the George Floyd death, perhaps.

Otherwise as a naturalized citizen, I assure you there is zero chance of this. We keep our passports close, and our naturalization certificates closer.

I agree that the border must be secured, but a country that has been invaded must deal with the invaders to restore its sovereignty. It may be necessary to eliminate the involvement of the regular judicial system in this process and use some sort of a tribunal system.

By the end of Biden's first term, we will have exceeded the point that one out of every ten people living within our borders is an illegal alien. This affects everything from crime to housing affordability to the taking of a census and proportional representation in congress. Mass deportation must occur, or the country is done.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Quote:

bad outcomes in enforcement (an accidentally deported citizen, for example)


If by bad outcomes you mean that an MS13 member has a shootout with DHS that kills his girlfriend and anchor babies creating a PR data point that the left and MSM can use like the George Floyd death, perhaps.

Otherwise as a naturalized citizen, I assure you there is zero chance of this. We keep our passports close, and our naturalization certificates closer.

I agree that the border must be secured, but a country that has been invaded must deal with the invaders to restore its sovereignty. It may be necessary to eliminate the involvement of the regular judicial system in this process and use some sort of a tribunal system.

By the end of Biden's first term, we will have exceeded the point that one out of every ten people living within our borders is an illegal alien. This affects everything from crime to housing affordability to the taking of a census and proportional representation in congress. Mass deportation must occur, or the country is done.
I'm not entirely disagreeing with you in principle. The real assault going on is to "rule of law." Our elected and appointed officials are executing policy they know the American people do not support.

That in no way changes anything I noted. The pushback on securing the border will be substantial, but surmountable. The pushback on mass deportations will make the histrionics of the first Trump term look sedate. You will see one court order after another halting every single facet, taking months/years to move up thru the courts, with the media pointing out the kinds of things I noted 24/7. Many Republicans will wilt under the pressure. And the Dems will get some wins. but the dinosaur in the room is the logistical realities = we do not have enough jail cells to do the kinds of mass deportations it would take to send them all back. We do not have enough courtrooms to do it. We do not have enough judges to do it; i.e. a courtroom is a factory that sits usable 24/7. We could theoretically do three shifts a day. But where do we get the judges? There is an answer for that - POTUS could sign an executive order designating all State Consular officers and All military JAG officers as immigration judges, then redeploy them where necessary to get busy deporting. But that itself would be immediately halted by some Fed District Judge somewhere and have to be litigated to SCOTUS. Trump will of course not give up. but it takes time. And even then, the numbers are not dispositive.

Ex: There is not a quick reference as to how many consular officer positions there are in the ForeignService. But there is for total # of Diplomats = 8,000. Subtract out Senior Service, PolOffs, ComOffs, AdmOffs, etc... and you're talking about maybe, at best 2k total consular officers. Are you going to close all the consular offices? No visas issued to visit USA? Think that would have a negative impact on the US economy? So cut that 2k number down by at least 500. So 1500 ConOffs available. Nice add, but not an ocean draining number. There are about 2K JAG officers in US Army. Multiply that times 3 for other services, then subtract what you think you need to keep the military legal system flowing.....

Or we could deputize those consular and JAG officers as Refugee officers (my choice) to get all the applications denied in short order (which have to happen FIRST, and would happen much more quickly than the deportation hearings).

See?
Mass deportation departures are simply not going to happen. There are not enough warm bodies and cold office spaces to do it. Hell, we don't have enough defense lawyers to do it. (remember, every deportee must have counsel.)
We COULD deputize state & local officials - sheriffs/police to arrest, local courts to do asylum and deporation hearings, etc...but we still have the jail and lawyer shortage issue BEFORE we get to the blizzard of lawsuits challenging existing SCOTUS rulings on supremacy clause.

Deportations will accelerate, but fall well below expectations.
So the Trump Admin will compensate by making a big show about building a wall and repelling all boarders.

Not saying that I wouldn't like to do more.
Saying I understand how hard it's going to be to do mass deportations. So to keep my political base happy, I'm going to slash & burn on the border, big smoke, big noises, to let everyone know no stone is going unturned to stop the flow of faux-refugees. I'll do that because it is a promise, it needs doing, and it will make a very positive impact on the country. And I'll also do it because the other part of the deal is damned near impossible to do and will take years to even get into position to be able to start the process at the level required.

(I didn't note all the obstacles to mass deporations. Just a few of the bigger obvious ones.)
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why are we funding pensions with our latest Ukraine aid package?!

We're over here struggling to fund social security and we're paying foreigner pensions, literally doing this while printing money to pay down our interest.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Why are we funding pensions with our latest Ukraine aid package?!

...


Someone was arguing with me on this forum that Ukraine was not a vassal state/client state.

When DC is literally over here paying to keep the lights on in that country….the State Department literally bought themselves a country
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Doc Holliday said:

Why are we funding pensions with our latest Ukraine aid package?!

...


Someone was arguing with me on this forum that Ukraine was not a vassal state/client state.

When DC is literally over here paying to keep the lights on in that country….the State Department literally bought themselves a country
There's people on here that would justify sending us into a depression if that was the cost of buying Ukraine
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Doc Holliday said:

Why are we funding pensions with our latest Ukraine aid package?!

...


Someone was arguing with me on this forum that Ukraine was not a vassal state/client state.

When DC is literally over here paying to keep the lights on in that country….the State Department literally bought themselves a country
It was me, and it still doesn't make it a vassal state as you don't seem to understand vassal states operate in the other direction. Vassal's pay tribute to their Empire State. If anything we're creating another dependent welfare state. That's a different relationship and issue.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

Doc Holliday said:

Why are we funding pensions with our latest Ukraine aid package?!

...


Someone was arguing with me on this forum that Ukraine was not a vassal state/client state.

When DC is literally over here paying to keep the lights on in that country….the State Department literally bought themselves a country
It was me, and it still doesn't make it a vassal state as you don't seem to understand vassal states operate in the other direction. Vassal's pay tribute to their Empire State. If anything we're creating another dependent welfare state. That's a different relationship and issue.



I guess per the definition we should refer to Ukraine more accurately as a puppet state….

[The relationships between vassal rulers and empires were dependent on the policies and agreements of each empire. While payment of tribute and military service was common amongst vassal states, the degree of independence and benefits given to vassal states varied. Today, more common terms are puppet state, protectorate, client state, associated state, or satellite state.]
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd rather support Ukraine full throttle. Cut off Israel and let them do protect themselves.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

I'd rather support Ukraine full throttle. Cut off Israel and let them do protect themselves.




Cut off aid only to Israel ?

LOL

Suspect your lady friends influence you more than you'd ever care to admit.

I would cut off all foreign aid ….every last penny.

Then spend the money on our own poor, homeless and mentally ill citizens.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

I'd rather support Ukraine full throttle. Cut off Israel and let them do protect themselves.




Cut off aid only to Israel ?

LOL

Suspect your lady friends influence you more than you'd ever care to admit.

I would cut off all foreign aid ….every last penny.

Then spend the money on our own poor, homeless and mentally ill citizens.
$7T budget, $3T in deficit, and we have people insisting that $74b in aid to Ukraine is causing the wheels to come off the Republic.

How about we zero out 100% of the Trillion devoted to Green New Deal nonsense?

To save a failing business, you have to cut the great big double digit numbers. That is simple math: fiddling around with the numbers after the decimal point will have no impact.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

I'd rather support Ukraine full throttle. Cut off Israel and let them do protect themselves.




Cut off aid only to Israel ?

LOL

Suspect your lady friends influence you more than you'd ever care to admit.

I would cut off all foreign aid ….every last penny.

Then spend the money on our own poor, homeless and mentally ill citizens.
$7T budget, $3T in deficit, and we have people insisting that $74b in aid to Ukraine is causing the wheels to come off the Republic.

How about we zero out 100% of the Trillion devoted to Green New Deal nonsense?

To save a failing business, you have to cut the great big double digit numbers. That is simple math: fiddling around with the numbers after the decimal point will have no impact.
Ukraine is a rounding error...
First Page Last Page
Page 78 of 168
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.