Extraordinary happenings in legislature. Looks like they will impeach Paxton, the Texas AG. Dan Morales was indicted and resigned back in the 90s..

May 24, 2023 2:21 PM
HK: Two hours of extraordinary testimony puts AG Ken Paxton on glide path to impeachment
Phelan takes control of the narrative, the Speaker can call the House back in on his own for Impeachment. Talk turns to Abbott choice to replace Paxton.
In two hours of the most riveting testimony seen in the Texas Capitol since hearings were first streamed, four attorneys, all with deep experience in public integrity issues revealed the results of their investigation of Attorney General Ken Paxton. The depth and breadth of their revelations stunned the committee and are at this very moment reverberating throughout the Capitol.
We will get to the politics and procedure in a moment.
Others will catalog the dozens of allegations of improprieties, unethical and yes, potential criminal behavior. The investigators even laid out a list of subjectsv for potential criminal prosecutions resulting from their documented findings.
There were multiple tracks or transgressions ranging from the reasonably well-known indictment for securities fraud and subsequent investigations of Paxton for the same offenses in 2012 even after having been sued in 2009.
But some of the more damning allegations to come to light were Paxton's personal interventions including allegedly handing off to Nate Paul unredacted law enforcement files justifying the search warrant of the Austin developer.

May 24, 2023 9:50 PM
Sources: Impeachment vote on AG Paxton could happen in the Texas House as soon as Saturday

http://www.quorumreport.com

He has been a huge embarrassment. Glad to know he only got his BA and MBA here and went to UVA for law degree

I can't think of an alum more embarrassing unless it was the Dildo Salesman on our BOR.

Inventory of potential criminal violations facing Ken Paxton
Violations of oath
- Gift to public servant - misdemeanor - home remodel (potential campaign donations)
- Abuse of official capacity - in office of AG comes into custody of personnel / property of OAG-allegation that there is over $72k (conservative) of time and efforts of high ranking officials -3rd degree felony
- Securities fraud 2011- felony first degree + 3rd degree+ 2003,2005,2012
- Misuse of official information - (documents from fbi released to public or one individual - circumstantial evidence says given to paiñ) - 3rd degree felony
- Retaliation- people within office that found out about details and were moved with Pat raise, but less control
- Dereliction of duty - failure to look out to the best interest of a charitable organization
- Breach of fiduciary obligation - 5 yr attorney - 25k- folks required to approve docusign had not done it- warned of criminal activity w/ benefit to Nate Paul to harm of entities - state jail felony
- False statement re: Travis county giving complaint

I was reading about him, earlier. Glad to see Republicans standing up to him. He's done enough damage.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/details-of-texas-attorney-general-ken-paxtons-scandal-shocks-house-panels-conscience

Details of Texas AG Ken Paxton's Scandal Shock House Panel's Conscience
"It curls my mustache," the Republican head of a House panel said after hearing from investigators.

The head of a Texas House panel was aghast Tuesday after investigators laid out wide-ranging corruption allegations against scandal-soaked Attorney General Ken Paxton, calling them "alarming to hear."
"It curls my mustache," said Rep. Andrew Murr, a fellow Republican, who no doubt was already familiar with the accusations that have swirled around Paxton for years.
Paxton, a staunch conservative in his third term as the state's top prosecutor, now finds himself facing possible impeachment proceedingson top of an ongoing FBI investigation and a long-stalled indictment.
His response has been to attack House Speaker Dade Phelan, accusing him on Tuesdaywhen word of the probe emergedof drinking on the job. On Wednesday, after the litany of allegations was unveiled during a three-hour hearing, Paxton claimed Phelan, a Republican, is a "liberal" who wants to "sabotage my work."
The investigators led the House committee through years of alleged misconduct that they believe broke the laws Paxton is sworn to uphold.
At the heart of of the matter are claims that Paxton used his office to assist a donorreal-estate developer Nate Paulwho then allegedly helped him remodel his home and hired his mistress.
Four Paxton aides who flagged the AG's intervention in Paul's affairs were fired.
"Each of these four men is a conservative Republican civil servant," investigator Erin Epley told the House committee. "Interviews show that they wanted to be loyal... and they tried to advise him well and strongly. When that failed, each was fired after reporting General Paxton to law enforcement."
As the FBI opened an inquiry, the aides filed a whistleblower suit against Paxton, who asked the state to pay them a $3.3 million settlement. Phelan balked at that, and the committee investigation was launched in March.
Shockingly, Paxton was accused of crimes long before this episode. In 2015, the rookie AG was indicted on securities fraud charges in a case that has been tied up in appeals ever since; Paxton denies the allegations and voters re-elected him twice since his indictment.
Paxton has also been named in a lawsuit by the State Bar for Texas, which accused him of misconduct for claiming voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election and asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Joe Biden's win in several states.
What happens next to Paxton is murky. The House Committee took no action, and the Legislature's session ends on Monday.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/details-of-texas-attorney-general-ken-paxtons-scandal-shocks-house-panels-conscience

Articles of impeachment about to be distributed pic.twitter.com/4hfRBPF8AP

— James Barragán 🌟 (@James_Barragan) May 26, 2023

It is highly unlikely that Ken Paxton would be impeached by the Texas Senate. 9 R senators and all the Ds would have to vote for impeachment. This is highly unlikely unless Dan Patrick supported his impeachment, which he won’t do. The GIC report could be a roadmap for the DOJ. pic.twitter.com/j52v1bpLit

— Jim Boyle (@JimGBoyle) May 25, 2023

Should have happened years ago.

Paxton needs to resign .

Not good for Paxton https://t.co/C9ckm61D5l

— Patrick Svitek (@PatrickSvitek) May 26, 2023

Really worth emphasizing here: If the House votes to impeach Paxton — something that requires a simple majority and is probably days away — he is immediately suspended from office pending the Senate trialhttps://t.co/WZX7EgOQjd #txlege

— Patrick Svitek (@PatrickSvitek) May 26, 2023

The Texas GOP needs to cut Paxton loose. He has been an embarrassment for years. I wonder what dirt he may have on other top Republicans. He seems like a guy who would have files on everyone. Hope that Abbott will lead and encourage the party to get him out of office. Unfortunate that he is a Baylor grad. I have heard good things about his wife. We each worked at the same law firm many years ago, though I don't know her.

LOL 48hrs after he was video'ed drunk on the House floor, leading to calls for his impeachment, Phelan orchestrates a hasty impeachment of Ken Paxton over issues the voters have already spoken on. Very expensive distraction ploy going on here.

whiterock said:

---

LOL 48hrs after he was video'ed drunk on the House floor, leading to calls for his impeachment, Phelan orchestrates a hasty impeachment of Ken Paxton over issues the voters have already spoken on. Very expensive distraction ploy going on here.

---

See the videos directly before and after the clip pushed by Paxton. Phelan apparently was not drunk. After talking like an auctioneer for several overtime days, it appears fatigue might be the more likely culprit. Paxton's request for settlement money from the State of Texas had already triggered a push for impeachment.

Again, I'm not saying I like the result of the legislature's session, but false accusations are just that. Even if Phelan was a Democrat, Paxton should have consequences for such a false accusation as well as his personal conduct.

whiterock said:

---

LOL 48hrs after he was video'ed drunk on the House floor, leading to calls for his impeachment, Phelan orchestrates a hasty impeachment of Ken Paxton over issues the voters have already spoken on. Very expensive distraction ploy going on here.

---

House committee started hearings in March. Committee report was unanimous.

The distraction is Paxton's accusation so folks like you can attempt to discount the articles of impeachment. If the Speaker fell over dead it won't change the charges against Paxton.

Paxton will be impeached, it only takes a simple majority. Conviction in the Senate isn't assured (it takes 2/3rds vote)

To refresh your memory:
Inventory of potential criminal violations facing Ken Paxton
Violations of oath
- Gift to public servant - misdemeanor - home remodel (potential campaign donations)
- Abuse of official capacity - in office of AG comes into custody of personnel / property of OAG-allegation that there is over $72k (conservative) of time and efforts of high ranking officials -3rd degree felony
- Securities fraud 2011- felony first degree + 3rd degree+ 2003,2005,2012
- Misuse of official information - (documents from fbi released to public or one individual - circumstantial evidence says given to paiñ) - 3rd degree felony
- Retaliation- people within office that found out about details and were moved with Pat raise, but less control
- Dereliction of duty - failure to look out to the best interest of a charitable organization
- Breach of fiduciary obligation - 5 yr attorney - 25k- folks required to approve docusign had not done it- warned of criminal activity w/ benefit to Nate Paul to harm of entities - state jail felony
- False statement re: Travis county giving complaint

So Paxton was doing a Biden ...

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

whiterock said:

---

LOL 48hrs after he was video'ed drunk on the House floor, leading to calls for his impeachment, Phelan orchestrates a hasty impeachment of Ken Paxton over issues the voters have already spoken on. Very expensive distraction ploy going on here.

---

See the videos directly before and after the clip pushed by Paxton. Phelan apparently was not drunk. After talking like an auctioneer for several overtime days, it appears fatigue might be the more likely culprit. Paxton's request for settlement money from the State of Texas had already triggered a push for impeachment.

Again, I'm not saying I like the result of the legislature's session, but false accusations are just that. Even if Phelan was a Democrat, Paxton should have consequences for such a false accusation as well as his personal conduct.

---

I've seen them, too, and he was most definitely impaired by more than fatigue, which we all know increases the efficacy of alcohol.

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

LOL 48hrs after he was video'ed drunk on the House floor, leading to calls for his impeachment, Phelan orchestrates a hasty impeachment of Ken Paxton over issues the voters have already spoken on. Very expensive distraction ploy going on here.

---

House committee started hearings in March. Committee report was unanimous.

The distraction is Paxton's accusation so folks like you can attempt to discount the articles of impeachment. If the Speaker fell over dead it won't change the charges against Paxton.

Paxton will be impeached, it only takes a simple majority. Conviction in the Senate isn't assured (it takes 2/3rds vote)

To refresh your memory:
Inventory of potential criminal violations facing Ken Paxton
Violations of oath
- Gift to public servant - misdemeanor - home remodel (potential campaign donations)
- Abuse of official capacity - in office of AG comes into custody of personnel / property of OAG-allegation that there is over $72k (conservative) of time and efforts of high ranking officials -3rd degree felony
- Securities fraud 2011- felony first degree + 3rd degree+ 2003,2005,2012
- Misuse of official information - (documents from fbi released to public or one individual - circumstantial evidence says given to paiñ) - 3rd degree felony
- Retaliation- people within office that found out about details and were moved with Pat raise, but less control
- Dereliction of duty - failure to look out to the best interest of a charitable organization
- Breach of fiduciary obligation - 5 yr attorney - 25k- folks required to approve docusign had not done it- warned of criminal activity w/ benefit to Nate Paul to harm of entities - state jail felony
- False statement re: Travis county giving complaint

---

That list of allegations would, in an earlier age, have been cause for concern but unfortunately they are levied in the modern era of Democrat lawfare against effective conservatives. That's why Paxton won statewide election 6 months ago, convincingly (5pts), although by a smaller margin than the top of the ticket (which won by 9-10pts).

Impeaching a guy who just got re-elected, for a list of things that happened before his re-election is....well....voters are going to remember that.

And yes, Phelan pulled this out of his arse to distract from the recent spectacle he made on the house floor.

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

LOL 48hrs after he was video'ed drunk on the House floor, leading to calls for his impeachment, Phelan orchestrates a hasty impeachment of Ken Paxton over issues the voters have already spoken on. Very expensive distraction ploy going on here.

---

House committee started hearings in March. Committee report was unanimous.

The distraction is Paxton's accusation so folks like you can attempt to discount the articles of impeachment. If the Speaker fell over dead it won't change the charges against Paxton.

Paxton will be impeached, it only takes a simple majority. Conviction in the Senate isn't assured (it takes 2/3rds vote)

To refresh your memory:
Inventory of potential criminal violations facing Ken Paxton
Violations of oath
- Gift to public servant - misdemeanor - home remodel (potential campaign donations)
- Abuse of official capacity - in office of AG comes into custody of personnel / property of OAG-allegation that there is over $72k (conservative) of time and efforts of high ranking officials -3rd degree felony
- Securities fraud 2011- felony first degree + 3rd degree+ 2003,2005,2012
- Misuse of official information - (documents from fbi released to public or one individual - circumstantial evidence says given to paiñ) - 3rd degree felony
- Retaliation- people within office that found out about details and were moved with Pat raise, but less control
- Dereliction of duty - failure to look out to the best interest of a charitable organization
- Breach of fiduciary obligation - 5 yr attorney - 25k- folks required to approve docusign had not done it- warned of criminal activity w/ benefit to Nate Paul to harm of entities - state jail felony
- False statement re: Travis county giving complaint

---

That list of allegations would, in an earlier age, have been cause for concern but unfortunately they are levied in the modern era of Democrat lawfare against effective conservatives. That's why Paxton won statewide election 6 months ago, convincingly (5pts), although by a smaller margin than the top of the ticket (which won by 9-10pts).

Impeaching a guy who just got re-elected, for a list of things that happened before his re-election is....well....voters are going to remember that.

And yes, Phelan pulled this out of his arse to distract from the recent spectacle he made on the house floor.

---

Uh, no he didn't. This has been in the works for a year or more. Listen, there may not be a more conservative person on this board than me, and I was a supporter of Ken for years. But he has disqualified himself.

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

LOL 48hrs after he was video'ed drunk on the House floor, leading to calls for his impeachment, Phelan orchestrates a hasty impeachment of Ken Paxton over issues the voters have already spoken on. Very expensive distraction ploy going on here.

---

House committee started hearings in March. Committee report was unanimous.

The distraction is Paxton's accusation so folks like you can attempt to discount the articles of impeachment. If the Speaker fell over dead it won't change the charges against Paxton.

Paxton will be impeached, it only takes a simple majority. Conviction in the Senate isn't assured (it takes 2/3rds vote)

To refresh your memory:
Inventory of potential criminal violations facing Ken Paxton
Violations of oath
- Gift to public servant - misdemeanor - home remodel (potential campaign donations)
- Abuse of official capacity - in office of AG comes into custody of personnel / property of OAG-allegation that there is over $72k (conservative) of time and efforts of high ranking officials -3rd degree felony
- Securities fraud 2011- felony first degree + 3rd degree+ 2003,2005,2012
- Misuse of official information - (documents from fbi released to public or one individual - circumstantial evidence says given to paiñ) - 3rd degree felony
- Retaliation- people within office that found out about details and were moved with Pat raise, but less control
- Dereliction of duty - failure to look out to the best interest of a charitable organization
- Breach of fiduciary obligation - 5 yr attorney - 25k- folks required to approve docusign had not done it- warned of criminal activity w/ benefit to Nate Paul to harm of entities - state jail felony
- False statement re: Travis county giving complaint

---

That list of allegations would, in an earlier age, have been cause for concern but unfortunately they are levied in the modern era of Democrat lawfare against effective conservatives. That's why Paxton won statewide election 6 months ago, convincingly (5pts), although by a smaller margin than the top of the ticket (which won by 9-10pts).

Impeaching a guy who just got re-elected, for a list of things that happened before his re-election is....well....voters are going to remember that.

And yes, Phelan pulled this out of his arse to distract from the recent spectacle he made on the house floor.

---

Great philosophy. Biden got re-elected after the Hunter Biden stuff, so that means he must be righteous?

Paxton knew what the House committee was going to do and tried to intimidate the Speaker with this deflection. You're too smart a political operative not to recognize it for what it is. I guess Ken sent you some talking points

whiterock said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

whiterock said:

---

LOL 48hrs after he was video'ed drunk on the House floor, leading to calls for his impeachment, Phelan orchestrates a hasty impeachment of Ken Paxton over issues the voters have already spoken on. Very expensive distraction ploy going on here.

---

See the videos directly before and after the clip pushed by Paxton. Phelan apparently was not drunk. After talking like an auctioneer for several overtime days, it appears fatigue might be the more likely culprit. Paxton's request for settlement money from the State of Texas had already triggered a push for impeachment.

Again, I'm not saying I like the result of the legislature's session, but false accusations are just that. Even if Phelan was a Democrat, Paxton should have consequences for such a false accusation as well as his personal conduct.

---

I've seen them, too, and he was most definitely impaired by more than fatigue, which we all know increases the efficacy of alcohol.

---

I've seen Speaker Phelan in action on a day in which he was banging the gavel for 16 hours. That long of a day is not really an aberration late in the legislative session. I would use high caution on the accusation of under the influence. The man also runs 5 miles a day religiously according to other legislators' staffers.
If Paxton was just wanting to push Senate legislation through the House, he chose a doozy of a way to try and get it done.

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

whiterock said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

whiterock said:

---

LOL 48hrs after he was video'ed drunk on the House floor, leading to calls for his impeachment, Phelan orchestrates a hasty impeachment of Ken Paxton over issues the voters have already spoken on. Very expensive distraction ploy going on here.

---

See the videos directly before and after the clip pushed by Paxton. Phelan apparently was not drunk. After talking like an auctioneer for several overtime days, it appears fatigue might be the more likely culprit. Paxton's request for settlement money from the State of Texas had already triggered a push for impeachment.

Again, I'm not saying I like the result of the legislature's session, but false accusations are just that. Even if Phelan was a Democrat, Paxton should have consequences for such a false accusation as well as his personal conduct.

---

I've seen them, too, and he was most definitely impaired by more than fatigue, which we all know increases the efficacy of alcohol.

---

I've seen Speaker Phelan in action on a day in which he was banging the gavel for 16 hours. That long of a day is not really an aberration late in the legislative session. I would use high caution on the accusation of under the influence. The man also runs 5 miles a day religiously according to other legislators' staffers.
If Paxton was just wanting to push Senate legislation through the House, he chose a doozy of a way to try and get it done.

---

So you're telling me to trust you rather than my lying eyes.

Dude had obvious motor coordination problems. Could not have passed a field sobriety test.

Paxton accepted a very large donation to his legal defense fund by a doctor under investigation for Medicare fraud by the AG's office. Paxton is the chief law enforcement officer in the state. He should be held to a high standard. Instead, he has been reckless in his decision-making for years.

whiterock said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

whiterock said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

whiterock said:

---

LOL 48hrs after he was video'ed drunk on the House floor, leading to calls for his impeachment, Phelan orchestrates a hasty impeachment of Ken Paxton over issues the voters have already spoken on. Very expensive distraction ploy going on here.

---

See the videos directly before and after the clip pushed by Paxton. Phelan apparently was not drunk. After talking like an auctioneer for several overtime days, it appears fatigue might be the more likely culprit. Paxton's request for settlement money from the State of Texas had already triggered a push for impeachment.

Again, I'm not saying I like the result of the legislature's session, but false accusations are just that. Even if Phelan was a Democrat, Paxton should have consequences for such a false accusation as well as his personal conduct.

---

I've seen them, too, and he was most definitely impaired by more than fatigue, which we all know increases the efficacy of alcohol.

---

I've seen Speaker Phelan in action on a day in which he was banging the gavel for 16 hours. That long of a day is not really an aberration late in the legislative session. I would use high caution on the accusation of under the influence. The man also runs 5 miles a day religiously according to other legislators' staffers.
If Paxton was just wanting to push Senate legislation through the House, he chose a doozy of a way to try and get it done.

---

So you're telling me to trust you rather than my lying eyes.

Dude had obvious motor coordination problems. Could not have passed a field sobriety test.

---

I'm not telling you anything other than to be wary as to identifying the cause from a very brief section of video, since other info could just as well indicate otherwise. Especially since Paxton knew he was moving toward impeachment before he pushed that video.

JXL said:

---

Should have happened years ago.

---

Yep.

About time.

Paxton refused to answer questions before a House committee and now complains he didn't get a chance to "weigh in"

AG Paxton sends government employees to lobby the Texas House ahead of impending impeachment vote, members say


Paxton's office argues he didn't get a chance to weigh in on the issue at hand, but capitol staffers remind us that Paxton refused to answer questions from House Appropriations members about his proposed $3.3 million settlement with whistleblowers
Several Texas House members and staffers on Friday afternoon told Quorum Report that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has dispatched at least one of his top government staffers to the Capitol to offer arguments for why they should vote "no" when articles of impeachment against him hit the floor.
Those AG staffers, including former Rep. Suzanna Hupp, have been telling members and their staff to consider that Paxton and his attorneys have not had a chance to weigh in on the General Investigating Committee's probe led by Chair Andy Murr. Hupp was seen walking the halls with Sen. Angela Paxton, by the way.
http://www.quorumreport.com

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

whiterock said:

---

LOL 48hrs after he was video'ed drunk on the House floor, leading to calls for his impeachment, Phelan orchestrates a hasty impeachment of Ken Paxton over issues the voters have already spoken on. Very expensive distraction ploy going on here.

---

House committee started hearings in March. Committee report was unanimous.

The distraction is Paxton's accusation so folks like you can attempt to discount the articles of impeachment. If the Speaker fell over dead it won't change the charges against Paxton.

Paxton will be impeached, it only takes a simple majority. Conviction in the Senate isn't assured (it takes 2/3rds vote)

To refresh your memory:
Inventory of potential criminal violations facing Ken Paxton
Violations of oath
- Gift to public servant - misdemeanor - home remodel (potential campaign donations)
- Abuse of official capacity - in office of AG comes into custody of personnel / property of OAG-allegation that there is over $72k (conservative) of time and efforts of high ranking officials -3rd degree felony
- Securities fraud 2011- felony first degree + 3rd degree+ 2003,2005,2012
- Misuse of official information - (documents from fbi released to public or one individual - circumstantial evidence says given to paiñ) - 3rd degree felony
- Retaliation- people within office that found out about details and were moved with Pat raise, but less control
- Dereliction of duty - failure to look out to the best interest of a charitable organization
- Breach of fiduciary obligation - 5 yr attorney - 25k- folks required to approve docusign had not done it- warned of criminal activity w/ benefit to Nate Paul to harm of entities - state jail felony
- False statement re: Travis county giving complaint

---

That list of allegations would, in an earlier age, have been cause for concern but unfortunately they are levied in the modern era of Democrat lawfare against effective conservatives. That's why Paxton won statewide election 6 months ago, convincingly (5pts), although by a smaller margin than the top of the ticket (which won by 9-10pts).

Impeaching a guy who just got re-elected, for a list of things that happened before his re-election is....well....voters are going to remember that.

And yes, Phelan pulled this out of his arse to distract from the recent spectacle he made on the house floor.

---

Great philosophy. Biden got re-elected after the Hunter Biden stuff, so that means he must be righteous?

Paxton knew what the House committee was going to do and tried to intimidate the Speaker with this deflection. You're too smart a political operative not to recognize it for what it is. I guess Ken sent you some talking points

---

Not hardly. Just know what I'm seeing from Phelan, who did this investigation by means as disingenuous as anything alleged against Paxton.

Rep. Matt Schaefer’s statement on the impeachment proceedings against Attorney General Ken Paxton:

“I have grave concerns with the process that has been used in the impeachment investigation of Attorney General Ken Paxton. Under the direction of Speaker Phelan, the House…

— Matt Schaefer (@RepMattSchaefer) May 26, 2023

Ken Paxton has been under indictment on state securities fraud charges since 2015, virtually the entire time since he took office as the state's attorney general, who supposedly represents the rule of law.

There's a huge irony in Republicans presenting themselves as the party devoted to fighting crime and holding criminals accountable while ignoring the corruption, financial crimes and self-dealing committed by the politicians they support & their cronies. (Almost as big as evangelical Christians supporting Trump as their standard-bearer, which has helped destroy some churches from the inside. David French has a good column that touches on that, which also correctly IDs the problem with Ron Desantis: nytimes.com/2023/05/25/opinion/desantis-conservatism-gop-trump.html).

If ever there was a case study in the respect Texas Republicans have for the rule of law as it concerns themselves (rather than Hunter Biden, minorities, men who are wrongly convicted, & refugees fleeing failed states), the failure of Texas Republicans to hold Ken Paxton accountable until yesterday is it.

And we still don't know for sure that Paxton will be held accountable. Or George Santos. Or Donald Trump. Or Jim Jordan, Andy Biggs, Ted Cruz, Ron Johnson, Josh Hawley, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Boebert, Paul Gosar, Ginni Thomas & several other sitting senators and House representatives & other prominent Republicans who committed seditious conspiracy in the service of the unworthy Donald J. Triump. Who also stole state secrets knowingly and lied about it: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/05/25/trump-classified-documents-mar-a-lago/

Stay tuned.

Said the current Biden apologist and Killary Clinton's lesbian lover.

GrowlTowel said:

---

Said the current Biden apologist and Killary Clinton's lesbian lover.

---

Said the apologist for the crook

Paxton invites supporters to come “peacefully let their voices be heard” at the Capitol tomorrow #txlege

— Patrick Svitek (@PatrickSvitek) May 26, 2023

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott remains silent on AG Ken Paxton debacle https://t.co/J1UPDA7vRy

— Patrick Svitek (@PatrickSvitek) May 26, 2023

It's been asked if Chris Hilton, Chief of General Litigation Division for the Office of Attorney General @KenPaxtonTX, was ordered by Paxton to try to testify or if he came on his own accord. Here's what Hilton told reporters - or didn't. Second video in thread. #txlege @KVUE https://t.co/uLXNSaWHZ2 pic.twitter.com/sJNuUmg4He

— Natalie Haddad (@natalieontv) May 26, 2023

“It’s very troubling,” ⁦@justinaholland⁩ said of Paxton findings. “My gut is the votes might be there. I know a lot of people haven’t made their decision, including me.” #txlege pic.twitter.com/x8GTNJ9YSG

— KarinaKling (@KarinaKling) May 27, 2023

Listen to Attorney General Paxton's full remarks from today's press conference: pic.twitter.com/pWnj0Ijc6G

— Texas Attorney General (@TXAG) May 26, 2023