AG Ken Paxton on glide path to impeachment

100,856 Views | 971 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by boognish_bear
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
Condemnation culture is a tool of progressives, inherently illiberal. I will not play.

I've never meet Fuentes. Never met with Stickland. Never taken a dime from the PAC or the Wilks. I did unfollow Fuentes on Twitter. He might be the only person I ever have unrfollowed on Twitter. (I follow foes and friends alike - Ida B. Welles, most of the Squad, Nancy Pelosi, Dade Phelan, etc....). Saw too many posts that troubled me and didn't think it was worth my time to follow his shtick = over the top trolling for clicks. I don't think he's anything more than an attention hound. Watch. At some point, he'll adopt some other personna.

I have no idea what did or didn't happen, and frankly don't care. I answer for me. So when someone tries to drag me into a contrived controversy, demanding that I condemn something (or else risk my reputation), I will not so politely tell them to go eff themselves. It's division by virtue posture....a small person looking for attention leaping up on a pedestal to point at a witch solely and demand denunciations (or else). More often than not it's just an effort to be the center of attention, to gain control of the agenda and get drunk on the self-perception of power. (not unlike Fuentes...) If you wanna be like that, have fun. It's a free country. I'll just point and laugh at the onanistic nature of it all and take bets on who gets splatted when its all over.

Phelan is doing it, of course, to get his anatomy out of a crack. Not gonna work. He very publicly crapped in his mess kit. The louder he gets, the more he proves my point - he's an amateur, immolating his own caucus, literally launching an all out war just because he embarrassed himself in the impeachment fiasco. Instead of going away, licking his wounds, doing something positive in special session (like taking the lead to pass a bill that that is a line-item in the GOP platform and enjoys a super-majority of public support), he's going down in defeat (again) making frivolous attacks, thereby stacking enemies up one by one. What a doofus.

No wonder you like him.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
Condemnation culture is a tool of progressives, inherently illiberal. I will not play.

I've never meet Fuentes. Never met with Stickland. Never taken a dime from the PAC or the Wilks. I did unfollow Fuentes on Twitter. He might be the only person I ever have unrfollowed on Twitter. (I follow foes and friends alike - Ida B. Welles, most of the Squad, Nancy Pelosi, Dade Phelan, etc....). Saw too many posts that troubled me and didn't think it was worth my time to follow his shtick = over the top trolling for clicks. I don't think he's anything more than an attention hound. Watch. At some point, he'll adopt some other personna.

I have no idea what did or didn't happen, and frankly don't care. I answer for me. So when someone tries to drag me into a contrived controversy, demanding that I condemn something (or else risk my reputation), I will not so politely tell them to go eff themselves. It's division by virtue posture....a small person looking for attention leaping up on a pedestal to point at a witch solely and demand denunciations (or else). More often than not it's just an effort to be the center of attention, to gain control of the agenda and get drunk on the self-perception of power. (not unlike Fuentes...) If you wanna be like that, have fun. It's a free country. I'll just point and laugh at the onanistic nature of it all and take bets on who gets splatted when its all over.

Phelan is doing it, of course, to get his anatomy out of a crack. Not gonna work. He very publicly crapped in his mess kit. The louder he gets, the more he proves my point - he's an amateur, immolating his own caucus, literally launching an all out war just because he embarrassed himself in the impeachment fiasco. Instead of going away, licking his wounds, doing something positive in special session (like taking the lead to pass a bill that that is a line-item in the GOP platform and enjoys a super-majority of public support), he's going down in defeat (again) making frivolous attacks, thereby stacking enemies up one by one. What a doofus.

No wonder you like him.
Your solution for the Republican scandals is for good men to do nothing. Thankfully, you're in the minority (I think)
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
Condemnation culture is a tool of progressives, inherently illiberal. I will not play.

I've never meet Fuentes. Never met with Stickland. Never taken a dime from the PAC or the Wilks. I did unfollow Fuentes on Twitter. He might be the only person I ever have unrfollowed on Twitter. (I follow foes and friends alike - Ida B. Welles, most of the Squad, Nancy Pelosi, Dade Phelan, etc....). Saw too many posts that troubled me and didn't think it was worth my time to follow his shtick = over the top trolling for clicks. I don't think he's anything more than an attention hound. Watch. At some point, he'll adopt some other personna.

I have no idea what did or didn't happen, and frankly don't care. I answer for me. So when someone tries to drag me into a contrived controversy, demanding that I condemn something (or else risk my reputation), I will not so politely tell them to go eff themselves. It's division by virtue posture....a small person looking for attention leaping up on a pedestal to point at a witch solely and demand denunciations (or else). More often than not it's just an effort to be the center of attention, to gain control of the agenda and get drunk on the self-perception of power. (not unlike Fuentes...) If you wanna be like that, have fun. It's a free country. I'll just point and laugh at the onanistic nature of it all and take bets on who gets splatted when its all over.

Phelan is doing it, of course, to get his anatomy out of a crack. Not gonna work. He very publicly crapped in his mess kit. The louder he gets, the more he proves my point - he's an amateur, immolating his own caucus, literally launching an all out war just because he embarrassed himself in the impeachment fiasco. Instead of going away, licking his wounds, doing something positive in special session (like taking the lead to pass a bill that that is a line-item in the GOP platform and enjoys a super-majority of public support), he's going down in defeat (again) making frivolous attacks, thereby stacking enemies up one by one. What a doofus.

No wonder you like him.
Your solution for the Republican scandals is for good men to do nothing. Thankfully, you're in the minority (I think)
Good men should have been more deferential to the will of the voters.
Good men should have waited for a conviction to launch an impeachment.
Good men unwilling to make that wait should have done the long hard work it takes to build a strong case.
Good men who botched an impeachment should move on to governance rather than spiteful insurgency.
Good men don't stand in the way of legislation which has super-majority support of the public.

I could go on, but Dade Phelan falls far short of "good" on just about every relevant point.

Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
Condemnation culture is a tool of progressives, inherently illiberal. I will not play.

I've never meet Fuentes. Never met with Stickland. Never taken a dime from the PAC or the Wilks. I did unfollow Fuentes on Twitter. He might be the only person I ever have unrfollowed on Twitter. (I follow foes and friends alike - Ida B. Welles, most of the Squad, Nancy Pelosi, Dade Phelan, etc....). Saw too many posts that troubled me and didn't think it was worth my time to follow his shtick = over the top trolling for clicks. I don't think he's anything more than an attention hound. Watch. At some point, he'll adopt some other personna.

I have no idea what did or didn't happen, and frankly don't care. I answer for me. So when someone tries to drag me into a contrived controversy, demanding that I condemn something (or else risk my reputation), I will not so politely tell them to go eff themselves. It's division by virtue posture....a small person looking for attention leaping up on a pedestal to point at a witch solely and demand denunciations (or else). More often than not it's just an effort to be the center of attention, to gain control of the agenda and get drunk on the self-perception of power. (not unlike Fuentes...) If you wanna be like that, have fun. It's a free country. I'll just point and laugh at the onanistic nature of it all and take bets on who gets splatted when its all over.

Phelan is doing it, of course, to get his anatomy out of a crack. Not gonna work. He very publicly crapped in his mess kit. The louder he gets, the more he proves my point - he's an amateur, immolating his own caucus, literally launching an all out war just because he embarrassed himself in the impeachment fiasco. Instead of going away, licking his wounds, doing something positive in special session (like taking the lead to pass a bill that that is a line-item in the GOP platform and enjoys a super-majority of public support), he's going down in defeat (again) making frivolous attacks, thereby stacking enemies up one by one. What a doofus.

No wonder you like him.
Your solution for the Republican scandals is for good men to do nothing. Thankfully, you're in the minority (I think)
Good men should have been more deferential to the will of the voters.
Good men should have waited for a conviction to launch an impeachment.
Good men unwilling to make that wait should have done the long hard work it takes to build a strong case.
Good men who botched an impeachment should move on to governance rather than spiteful insurgency.
Good men don't stand in the way of legislation which has super-majority support of the public.

I could go on, but Dade Phelan falls far short of "good" on just about every relevant point.




75% of House Republicans were good men
The 4% who followed Gaetz weren't deferential & sided with Democrats to make chaos
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There you have it. People who agree with Oso are 'good men'.

Individuals with other opinions are not, as he calls it.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

There you have it. People who agree with Oso are 'good men'.

Individuals with other opinions are not, as he calls it.

Exactly. "Good men" following a leader delivering $2T deficits and STILL will not return to regular order (like we had under Gingrich). People who say "enough!" to that are the problem.

Here's a good man making a good point. Meanwhile, Oso pulls back baseboards to find a single right wing cockroach to justify attacking Republicans while ignoring the entire Dem party divided down the middle over whether what happened to Israel is a good or bad thing.

OsoCoreyell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
Condemnation culture is a tool of progressives, inherently illiberal. I will not play.

I've never meet Fuentes. Never met with Stickland. Never taken a dime from the PAC or the Wilks. I did unfollow Fuentes on Twitter. He might be the only person I ever have unrfollowed on Twitter. (I follow foes and friends alike - Ida B. Welles, most of the Squad, Nancy Pelosi, Dade Phelan, etc....). Saw too many posts that troubled me and didn't think it was worth my time to follow his shtick = over the top trolling for clicks. I don't think he's anything more than an attention hound. Watch. At some point, he'll adopt some other personna.

I have no idea what did or didn't happen, and frankly don't care. I answer for me. So when someone tries to drag me into a contrived controversy, demanding that I condemn something (or else risk my reputation), I will not so politely tell them to go eff themselves. It's division by virtue posture....a small person looking for attention leaping up on a pedestal to point at a witch solely and demand denunciations (or else). More often than not it's just an effort to be the center of attention, to gain control of the agenda and get drunk on the self-perception of power. (not unlike Fuentes...) If you wanna be like that, have fun. It's a free country. I'll just point and laugh at the onanistic nature of it all and take bets on who gets splatted when its all over.

Phelan is doing it, of course, to get his anatomy out of a crack. Not gonna work. He very publicly crapped in his mess kit. The louder he gets, the more he proves my point - he's an amateur, immolating his own caucus, literally launching an all out war just because he embarrassed himself in the impeachment fiasco. Instead of going away, licking his wounds, doing something positive in special session (like taking the lead to pass a bill that that is a line-item in the GOP platform and enjoys a super-majority of public support), he's going down in defeat (again) making frivolous attacks, thereby stacking enemies up one by one. What a doofus.

No wonder you like him.
Your solution for the Republican scandals is for good men to do nothing. Thankfully, you're in the minority (I think)
Good men should have been more deferential to the will of the voters.
Good men should have waited for a conviction to launch an impeachment.
Good men unwilling to make that wait should have done the long hard work it takes to build a strong case.
Good men who botched an impeachment should move on to governance rather than spiteful insurgency.
Good men don't stand in the way of legislation which has super-majority support of the public.

I could go on, but Dade Phelan falls far short of "good" on just about every relevant point.


Good men do what's right.
Impeachement is a political process that is separate from the criminal process.
The case was very strong, but the fear of Trump was stronger.
No one with any morals should work with or for Paxton.

And I don't give a fig about Phelan.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You obviously have no problem with Phelan appointing Democrats to committee chairs. That guy is about as conservative as Joe Biden.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
OsoCoreyell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

You obviously have no problem with Phelan appointing Democrats to committee chairs. That guy is about as conservative as Joe Biden.
Why does me pointing out that Ken is undeserving of public trust mean that I'm on Team Phelan? It's that kind of mindset that makes good conservatives into supporters of whatever nonsense their "team" gets up to. Be a conservative and believe in and act on those ideas, which include a desire to see justice, fairness and honesty. In the words of the great Dr. Stephen Maturin:

Its either "my side is never wrong," which is idiocy, or "my side even if they're wrong," which is infamous!
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oso: "Why does me pointing out that Ken is undeserving of public trust mean that I'm on Team Phelan?"

Because you have left posts which at least imply you support Phelan.

Maybe you didn't even realize you were doing it, but you come off as raging mad at the idea that Paxton gets to stay AG, to the point that all the sources you quoted were leftist hate groups.

You may notice that a lot of folks have left this alone. Paxton is AG and that's not going to change until the next election.

And by the way, Phelan is a back-stabbing hypocrite whose sabotage of conservative goals forced Abbott to call a Special Session, but you have not written one word against him.


That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
OsoCoreyell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Oso: "Why does me pointing out that Ken is undeserving of public trust mean that I'm on Team Phelan?"

Because you have left posts which at least imply you support Phelan.

Maybe you didn't even realize you were doing it, but you come off as raging mad at the idea that Paxton gets to stay AG, to the point that all the sources you quoted were leftist hate groups.

You may notice that a lot of folks have left this alone. Paxton is AG and that's not going to change until the next election.

And by the way, Phelan is a back-stabbing hypocrite whose sabotage of conservative goals forced Abbott to call a Special Session, but you have not written one word against him.



Maybe inferred by you, but certainly not implied. I don't agree with how Phelan runs the House. I can still think Paxton doesn't deserve to serve in public office. Of course I'm raging mad that Paxton gets to stay as AG. I think he's a bad guy who, by the way, used to be a good friend and someone for whom I have personally knocked on doors and given money.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OsoCoreyell said:

Oldbear83 said:

Oso: "Why does me pointing out that Ken is undeserving of public trust mean that I'm on Team Phelan?"

Because you have left posts which at least imply you support Phelan.

Maybe you didn't even realize you were doing it, but you come off as raging mad at the idea that Paxton gets to stay AG, to the point that all the sources you quoted were leftist hate groups.

You may notice that a lot of folks have left this alone. Paxton is AG and that's not going to change until the next election.

And by the way, Phelan is a back-stabbing hypocrite whose sabotage of conservative goals forced Abbott to call a Special Session, but you have not written one word against him.



Maybe inferred by you, but certainly not implied. I don't agree with how Phelan runs the House. I can still think Paxton doesn't deserve to serve in public office. Of course I'm raging mad that Paxton gets to stay as AG. I think he's a bad guy who, by the way, used to be a good friend and someone for whom I have personally knocked on doors and given money.
Elsa says 'let it go', son.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OsoCoreyell said:

Oldbear83 said:

Oso: "Why does me pointing out that Ken is undeserving of public trust mean that I'm on Team Phelan?"

Because you have left posts which at least imply you support Phelan.

Maybe you didn't even realize you were doing it, but you come off as raging mad at the idea that Paxton gets to stay AG, to the point that all the sources you quoted were leftist hate groups.

You may notice that a lot of folks have left this alone. Paxton is AG and that's not going to change until the next election.

And by the way, Phelan is a back-stabbing hypocrite whose sabotage of conservative goals forced Abbott to call a Special Session, but you have not written one word against him.



Maybe inferred by you, but certainly not implied. I don't agree with how Phelan runs the House. I can still think Paxton doesn't deserve to serve in public office. Of course I'm raging mad that Paxton gets to stay as AG. I think he's a bad guy who, by the way, used to be a good friend and someone for whom I have personally knocked on doors and given money.
Phelan is a good man doing a good job. Paxton is a crook
OsoCoreyell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

OsoCoreyell said:

Oldbear83 said:

Oso: "Why does me pointing out that Ken is undeserving of public trust mean that I'm on Team Phelan?"

Because you have left posts which at least imply you support Phelan.

Maybe you didn't even realize you were doing it, but you come off as raging mad at the idea that Paxton gets to stay AG, to the point that all the sources you quoted were leftist hate groups.

You may notice that a lot of folks have left this alone. Paxton is AG and that's not going to change until the next election.

And by the way, Phelan is a back-stabbing hypocrite whose sabotage of conservative goals forced Abbott to call a Special Session, but you have not written one word against him.



Maybe inferred by you, but certainly not implied. I don't agree with how Phelan runs the House. I can still think Paxton doesn't deserve to serve in public office. Of course I'm raging mad that Paxton gets to stay as AG. I think he's a bad guy who, by the way, used to be a good friend and someone for whom I have personally knocked on doors and given money.
Elsa says 'let it go', son.
How about no.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OsoCoreyell said:

Oldbear83 said:

OsoCoreyell said:

Oldbear83 said:

Oso: "Why does me pointing out that Ken is undeserving of public trust mean that I'm on Team Phelan?"

Because you have left posts which at least imply you support Phelan.

Maybe you didn't even realize you were doing it, but you come off as raging mad at the idea that Paxton gets to stay AG, to the point that all the sources you quoted were leftist hate groups.

You may notice that a lot of folks have left this alone. Paxton is AG and that's not going to change until the next election.

And by the way, Phelan is a back-stabbing hypocrite whose sabotage of conservative goals forced Abbott to call a Special Session, but you have not written one word against him.



Maybe inferred by you, but certainly not implied. I don't agree with how Phelan runs the House. I can still think Paxton doesn't deserve to serve in public office. Of course I'm raging mad that Paxton gets to stay as AG. I think he's a bad guy who, by the way, used to be a good friend and someone for whom I have personally knocked on doors and given money.
Elsa says 'let it go', son.
How about no.
OK, now I see you as 'mini-me' to Hunter ...
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
No, the sleaze is focusing on one internet troll with limited following rather than the institutional anti-semitism throughout unions, universities, and the Democrat Party which is throwing thousands of hard core fasicsts into the streets changing "gas the Jews" in cities all across our great country.

You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OsoCoreyell said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
Condemnation culture is a tool of progressives, inherently illiberal. I will not play.

I've never meet Fuentes. Never met with Stickland. Never taken a dime from the PAC or the Wilks. I did unfollow Fuentes on Twitter. He might be the only person I ever have unrfollowed on Twitter. (I follow foes and friends alike - Ida B. Welles, most of the Squad, Nancy Pelosi, Dade Phelan, etc....). Saw too many posts that troubled me and didn't think it was worth my time to follow his shtick = over the top trolling for clicks. I don't think he's anything more than an attention hound. Watch. At some point, he'll adopt some other personna.

I have no idea what did or didn't happen, and frankly don't care. I answer for me. So when someone tries to drag me into a contrived controversy, demanding that I condemn something (or else risk my reputation), I will not so politely tell them to go eff themselves. It's division by virtue posture....a small person looking for attention leaping up on a pedestal to point at a witch solely and demand denunciations (or else). More often than not it's just an effort to be the center of attention, to gain control of the agenda and get drunk on the self-perception of power. (not unlike Fuentes...) If you wanna be like that, have fun. It's a free country. I'll just point and laugh at the onanistic nature of it all and take bets on who gets splatted when its all over.

Phelan is doing it, of course, to get his anatomy out of a crack. Not gonna work. He very publicly crapped in his mess kit. The louder he gets, the more he proves my point - he's an amateur, immolating his own caucus, literally launching an all out war just because he embarrassed himself in the impeachment fiasco. Instead of going away, licking his wounds, doing something positive in special session (like taking the lead to pass a bill that that is a line-item in the GOP platform and enjoys a super-majority of public support), he's going down in defeat (again) making frivolous attacks, thereby stacking enemies up one by one. What a doofus.

No wonder you like him.
Your solution for the Republican scandals is for good men to do nothing. Thankfully, you're in the minority (I think)
Good men should have been more deferential to the will of the voters.
Good men should have waited for a conviction to launch an impeachment.
Good men unwilling to make that wait should have done the long hard work it takes to build a strong case.
Good men who botched an impeachment should move on to governance rather than spiteful insurgency.
Good men don't stand in the way of legislation which has super-majority support of the public.

I could go on, but Dade Phelan falls far short of "good" on just about every relevant point.


Good men do what's right.
Impeachement is a political process that is separate from the criminal process.
The case was very strong, but the fear of Trump was stronger.
No one with any morals should work with or for Paxton.

And I don't give a fig about Phelan.

I don't work with or for Paxton. I hear a lot of allegations about him, but none of them ever seem to stick. So I'm watching and waiting. If he's convicted of something, I will be at the forefront of the impeachment crowd.

You should care a lot about Phelan. Dude is incompetent and done far more damage to the GOP than Paxton has.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

You obviously have no problem with Phelan appointing Democrats to committee chairs. That guy is about as conservative as Joe Biden.
That is a peculiarly Texas tradition. There is much pressure within the party to end it. But the House, as an institution, cannot summon the will to do so. So while it is fair to criticize him for continuing the practice, it is not a monster of his own creation.

And there is another dysfunctional tradition - the rules by which we select a speaker. We do not unite around the choice of the caucus and vote in bloc, as is the case in Washington. Rather, we allow Dems to participate in the jockeying of the candidates. By partnering with the most liberal Republicans to agree on a candidate, Democrats effectively select our speaker, ensuring he/she is always from the left-most part of the GOP caucus. That also makes him/her beholden to Democrats....he cannot ignore them. He has to give them enough to keep them "on the reservation." (See link.)

And that, gentlemen, is why we got a premature impeachment of Paxton. Dems demanded it. Phelan could not just tell them to go pound salt without risking his Speakership. So they moved forward with damning but not conclusive evidence. The Senate did its job and rejected it (as no one in either chamber really wanted to ever face a similar half-baked hatchet job). But, as I said from the outset, the whole process was incredibly divisive, not just between conservative and moderate factions but also between the institutions of House and Senate. Very predictable. Should have waited until next session by which time the prosections/lawsuits might have provided preponderant evidence and/or a conviction/judgment. But that wouldn't have been helpful to democrats for 2024. So here we are. Tx GOP in a civil war, all because we have a moderate speaker beholden to Democrats.

It is what it is. But the moderate GOP'ers love it. Nothing makes them happier than getting to stick it to the conservatives, who always get in the way of cutting up pork with Democrats.

https://texasscorecard.com/state/how-the-texas-house-speaker-is-chosen/
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OsoCoreyell said:

Oldbear83 said:

You obviously have no problem with Phelan appointing Democrats to committee chairs. That guy is about as conservative as Joe Biden.
Why does me pointing out that Ken is undeserving of public trust mean that I'm on Team Phelan? It's that kind of mindset that makes good conservatives into supporters of whatever nonsense their "team" gets up to. Be a conservative and believe in and act on those ideas, which include a desire to see justice, fairness and honesty. In the words of the great Dr. Stephen Maturin:

Its either "my side is never wrong," which is idiocy, or "my side even if they're wrong," which is infamous!
he left out the GOP moderate mantra: "my side is always wrong!"
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

OsoCoreyell said:

Oldbear83 said:

Oso: "Why does me pointing out that Ken is undeserving of public trust mean that I'm on Team Phelan?"

Because you have left posts which at least imply you support Phelan.

Maybe you didn't even realize you were doing it, but you come off as raging mad at the idea that Paxton gets to stay AG, to the point that all the sources you quoted were leftist hate groups.

You may notice that a lot of folks have left this alone. Paxton is AG and that's not going to change until the next election.

And by the way, Phelan is a back-stabbing hypocrite whose sabotage of conservative goals forced Abbott to call a Special Session, but you have not written one word against him.



Maybe inferred by you, but certainly not implied. I don't agree with how Phelan runs the House. I can still think Paxton doesn't deserve to serve in public office. Of course I'm raging mad that Paxton gets to stay as AG. I think he's a bad guy who, by the way, used to be a good friend and someone for whom I have personally knocked on doors and given money.
Phelan is a good man doing a good job. Paxton is a crook
Phelan is an incompetent who has sold out his allegiance to the other side. Paxton may be a crook, but the jury is still out.

Either way, Phelan gots to go. He either chose to impeach an honest man, or failed to nail a crook.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

OsoCoreyell said:

Oldbear83 said:

Oso: "Why does me pointing out that Ken is undeserving of public trust mean that I'm on Team Phelan?"

Because you have left posts which at least imply you support Phelan.

Maybe you didn't even realize you were doing it, but you come off as raging mad at the idea that Paxton gets to stay AG, to the point that all the sources you quoted were leftist hate groups.

You may notice that a lot of folks have left this alone. Paxton is AG and that's not going to change until the next election.

And by the way, Phelan is a back-stabbing hypocrite whose sabotage of conservative goals forced Abbott to call a Special Session, but you have not written one word against him.



Maybe inferred by you, but certainly not implied. I don't agree with how Phelan runs the House. I can still think Paxton doesn't deserve to serve in public office. Of course I'm raging mad that Paxton gets to stay as AG. I think he's a bad guy who, by the way, used to be a good friend and someone for whom I have personally knocked on doors and given money.
Phelan is a good man doing a good job. Paxton is a crook
Phelan is an incompetent who has sold out his allegiance to the other side. Paxton may be a crook, but the jury is still out.

Either way, Phelan gots to go. He either chose to impeach an honest man, or failed to nail a crook.
If Phelan is incompetent, why did 75% of Republican House members vote to impeach?

If Paxton is honest, only a very competent Speaker could engineer an impeachment. Anyone can impeach a crook (and that happened).

How does Phelan fail if the Senate comes up one vote short of conviction?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

You obviously have no problem with Phelan appointing Democrats to committee chairs. That guy is about as conservative as Joe Biden.

And there is another dysfunctional tradition - the rules by which we select a speaker. We do not unite around the choice of the caucus and vote in bloc, as is the case in Washington.
That's not what is happening in Washington. Scalise got a majority of the vote in the caucus, but a faction refused to abide by the rule adopted just a few hours earlier and did not unite around Scalise. Now that group is mad because another faction isn't abiding by the rule and Jordan is struggling.

This is what happens when 4% of the Republican conference tries to impose its will on the 96%.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
No, the sleaze is focusing on one internet troll with limited following rather than the institutional anti-semitism throughout unions, universities, and the Democrat Party which is throwing thousands of hard core fasicsts into the streets changing "gas the Jews" in cities all across our great country.

You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
No, the sleaze is focusing on one internet troll with limited following rather than the institutional anti-semitism throughout unions, universities, and the Democrat Party which is throwing thousands of hard core fasicsts into the streets changing "gas the Jews" in cities all across our great country.

You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?


Oso: "who do I hate?'

Find a mirror
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

OsoCoreyell said:

Oldbear83 said:

Oso: "Why does me pointing out that Ken is undeserving of public trust mean that I'm on Team Phelan?"

Because you have left posts which at least imply you support Phelan.

Maybe you didn't even realize you were doing it, but you come off as raging mad at the idea that Paxton gets to stay AG, to the point that all the sources you quoted were leftist hate groups.

You may notice that a lot of folks have left this alone. Paxton is AG and that's not going to change until the next election.

And by the way, Phelan is a back-stabbing hypocrite whose sabotage of conservative goals forced Abbott to call a Special Session, but you have not written one word against him.



Maybe inferred by you, but certainly not implied. I don't agree with how Phelan runs the House. I can still think Paxton doesn't deserve to serve in public office. Of course I'm raging mad that Paxton gets to stay as AG. I think he's a bad guy who, by the way, used to be a good friend and someone for whom I have personally knocked on doors and given money.
Phelan is a good man doing a good job. Paxton is a crook
Phelan is an incompetent who has sold out his allegiance to the other side. Paxton may be a crook, but the jury is still out.

Either way, Phelan gots to go. He either chose to impeach an honest man, or failed to nail a crook.
If Phelan is incompetent, why did 75% of Republican House members vote to impeach?

If Paxton is honest, only a very competent Speaker could engineer an impeachment. Anyone can impeach a crook (and that happened).

How does Phelan fail if the Senate comes up one vote short of conviction?
I can't help you if you are going to live in a dream world of silliness. The way Phelan framed the issue mattered (as an indictment with no public hearings, no under oath testimony). They way Phelan whipped the issue mattered. It was not a "clean bill" where reps were free to vote their conscience. It was "give me this, or I will make you pay." My rep (Doc Anderson) was nearing retirement and decided to pull the trigger early, knowing next session would be miserable after his "no" vote. Anytime you're whipping an impeachment vote for a member in your own party, it's a bad sign. Pure power play. Sure, he got it thru the house. But it made for a very weak case in the Senate, as deeper inspection illustrated all the short-comings, to include allegations of fact that turned out to untrue. I mean, you had prosecution witnesses who admitted, under oath, that they had no evidence to support their allegations. I mean, geez......

Bottom line is, if Paxton was the kind of crook you feel so deeply he is, the case would have been a lot stronger and you wouldn't have to make up nonsense like "one vote short of conviction."

By launching off on a poorly timed, poorly planned, poorly documented impeachment of an official who had just won statewide re-election in which the issues in question were public knowledge, Phelan has opened up a civil war within the Texas GOP. I told you that was going to happen. And here we are. But you are happy. You are never happy, it seems, unless you have some baseless allegation you can use to grind on Republicans.

Phelan has got to go. Mean, divisive, totally incompetent.

whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
No, the sleaze is focusing on one internet troll with limited following rather than the institutional anti-semitism throughout unions, universities, and the Democrat Party which is throwing thousands of hard core fasicsts into the streets changing "gas the Jews" in cities all across our great country.

You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
No, the sleaze is focusing on one internet troll with limited following rather than the institutional anti-semitism throughout unions, universities, and the Democrat Party which is throwing thousands of hard core fasicsts into the streets changing "gas the Jews" in cities all across our great country.

You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
No, the sleaze is focusing on one internet troll with limited following rather than the institutional anti-semitism throughout unions, universities, and the Democrat Party which is throwing thousands of hard core fasicsts into the streets changing "gas the Jews" in cities all across our great country.

You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Quote:

Documents released Tuesday by the House impeachment managers reveal closer ties between the contractor who renovated Attorney General Ken Paxton's home and Nate Paul, the financially troubled Austin real estate investor who was accused of bribing Paxton by paying for the work.

The contractor, Kevin Wood, swapped emails with Paul to provide updates about the home upgrades. The documents also show Wood was asked to testify in Paxton's trial, but would have invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

"Guys just finished applying 2nd coat of paint sealer," Wood wrote in one exchange with Paul, who asked for pictures.

House board of managers chair, Junction state Rep. Andrew Murr, and vice chair, Houston state Rep. Ann Johnson, said in a public letter that they were releasing the documents because of "the need to provide the highest level of transparency for the people of Texas." The evidence didn't come out during the two-week impeachment trial for a variety of reasons, they said, including time constraints and procedural decisions.

The documents released Tuesday show Wood performed the bulk of the house work and corresponded directly with Paul about the improvements, giving him updates and coordinating the use of storage facilities during the renovations. Wood's attorney said he was never paid for the project.

Paxton's lawyers argued during trial that the attorney general paid Cupertino Builders about $120,000 for the home upgrades, which they said proved he did not receive the work for free or as a bribe.

House prosecutors had alleged the six-figure wire transfer was a cover-up payment, made hours after Paxton's top deputies reported their boss to federal authorities for the alleged bribery. Cupertino Builders had not yet filed organization papers in Texas and didn't do so until weeks later, state records show. The company was dissolved less than two years later.

Not sure the above proves anything but it was interesting Paxton, Paul and Laura and now new evidence that Wood was included in all who would take the 5th if called to testify.

I'm surprised Ranger couldn't arrange a "wire" that would have proved what is being speculated. The House didn't really provide the damaging evidence we needed to prove this crook and his friends are crooks of the highest order. They are skilled in politics of avoiding incremination.

Phelan's is proving his critics right. His assaults on Patrick prove he's not pursuing good government. He's pursuing conservative Republicahelan?ns.
Is Patrick pursuing good government when he criticizes Phelan?
By any reasonable standard. Phelan wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a hasty, ill-prepared, ill-presented, and most of all unnecessary impeachment of a man who just comfortably won re-election in which the issues in question were all public knowledge. The prudent course of action for an impeachment is to drip-drip-drip-drip the evidence out and drive down the public support for said official, or better yet, wait for an actual conviction. But such would not have removed Paxton in a helpful time frame for Phelan and his supporters (mostly Democrats....). So they had to move immediately. How they could have miscalculated so badly about their case? How could they not have read the mood of the Senate? How could they have so badly misread the mood of the party and the public? It was political incompetence of the highest order. And now, Phelan has not only picked a very ill-advised battle and lost it, but he's doubling down on it. No conciliation. No quiet tactical retreat to reorganize for a future attack. Oh no. He's turning the schism he opened into a full-scale civil war between institutions, elected officials, and within the GOP. And he's doing it purely to rehabilitate his own reputation. Won't work.

It would be one thing if Phelan was just a bumbling doofus who couldn't get anything done. The guy is a full-blown menace, to the Republican agenda in particular and the larger imperative for good governance.

But he made you feel good, slaked your hate toward anyone who's conservative enough to embarrass you, so there's that.

75% of Republicans in the Texas House vote to impeach a crook, and you side with the crook because Democrats were unanimous. The Tx Senate was 1 vote shy of conviction. Now Texas Republicans will have to deal with their AG being indicted. There will be a very public trial, probably during an election year.
You are grasping. The official Senate vote failed by considerably more than 1 vote. The rest is spin. The House voted by the margin it did for a reason - the Speaker whipped the vote. Quite a few reps went along to remain effective for their district. (Mine did not.) And I also made a point you have studiously ignored - even those who supported the impeachment should be angry at Phelan - he did a really, really poor job of building the case for impeachment, on multiple levels. Totally incompetent. If Paxton really is THAT guilty, getting a conviction should have been easy, right?

4% of Congressional Republicans join 100% of Democrat caucus to oust a Republican Speaker, so naturally you take the side of the Democrats. The US House of Representatives is in chaos and 4% of Republicans are responsible.
Geez, you can't get anything right. I took the side of the Republicans in Congress, who need and deserve a Speaker who will stick to the agreements he made. I'm not talking about radical things. I"m talking about simple things, like regular order on budgets, 72 hour minimum for posting bills prior to voting (to allow members to actually read the bills they're voting on) that no sane Republican would have a problem with.

Try winning an election without Independents. You guys aren't growing the party, you're making the tent smaller.
LOL we added 14m votes to the party in 2020 and won the popular vote in the mid-terms by 4m. You're the smaller tent guy, wanting to run off all the Trump supporters (2/3 of the party).

Phelan is gonna get rolled in special session. Will be fun to watch. Also will be fun to watch Gov and LtGov pile in against him in the next primary. You can take it to the bank that both of them are tired of dealing with such a lightweight.

These guys funded the primary campaign against Abbott. Now hosting Fuentes and funding campaign against Republican House members. Some Republicans apparently are comfortable with anti-semites and Hitler apologists (Fuentes brags about this).

CONSERVATIVE PAC LEADER'S MEETING WITH WHITE SUPREMACIST NICK FUENTES LEADS TO CONDEMNATIONS, ESCALATES GOP INFIGHTING
THE TRIBUNE REPORTED SUNDAY THAT JONATHAN STICKLAND, THE LEADER OF DEFEND TEXAS LIBERTY PAC, HOSTED FUENTES, A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND ANTISEMITE, IN FORT WORTH FOR NEARLY 7 HOURS ON FRIDAY. PHELAN CALLED ON LT. GOV. DAN PATRICK AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO REDIRECT ANY MONEY THEY RECEIVED FROM THE PAC.
House Speaker Dade Phelan strongly condemned the leader of a major conservative PAC and demanded that elected officials including Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick return money they received from the group, one day after The Texas Tribune reported that it had recently hosted well-known white supremacist Nick Fuentes.
"This (is) not just a casual misstep," Phelan said in a statement. "It's indicative of the moral, political rot that has been festering in a certain segment of our party for far too long. Anti-Semitism, bigotry and Hitler apologists should find no sanctuary in the Republican party. Period. We cannot and must not tolerate the tacit endorsement of such vile ideologies."
The Tribune reported Sunday that Jonathan Stickland, the leader of Defend Texas Liberty PAC and a related consulting firm, Pale Horse Strategies, hosted Fuentes in Fort Worth for nearly 7 hours on Friday. Fuentes is an avowed admirer of Adolf Hitler, has called for "holy war" against Jews and said that "all I want is revenge against my enemies and a total Aryan victory."
Acting on a tip, a Tribune reporter and photographer observed Fuentes and others including Kyle Rittenhouse, who was acquitted of homicide after killing two Black Lives Matter protesters in 2020 enter the one-story office of Pale Horse Strategies in Fort Worth. Republican Party of Texas Chair Matt Rinaldi also was inside the office for about 45 minutes, though Rinaldi told the Tribune that he had no idea that Fuentes was there, condemned him outright and said he wouldn't meet with him "in a million years."
Defend Texas Liberty is funded by two West Texas oil billionaires Tim Dunn and Farris Wilks who are also Attorney General Ken Paxton's biggest donors. Earlier this year, the group made headlines after it gave $3 million in loans and donations to Patrick ahead of Paxton's impeachment trial in the Texas Senate, over which Patrick presided.
Despite his open adoration for Hitler and his violent rhetoric, Fuentes has not been entirely cast out of right-wing circles. Hard-right Republicans, including U.S. Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Paul Gosar of Arizona, have spoken at Fuentes' annual conference alongside avowed white supremacists.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/09/dade-phelan-speaker-nick-fuentes-dan-patrick-defend-texas-liberty/

Disgusting distraction ploy by Phelan (and you).

We've got pro-Hamas demonstrations in the streets of this country celebrating the most barbaric terrorist attack in my lifetime, Democrat members of Congress hanging Palestinian flags in their office to celebrate the attacks and/or refusing to condemn terrorism after "some people did something," and he/you dip down into the fringiest part of Twittter to find a racist/anti-semitic nutjob to attach to your GOP opponents just to try to stop a bill that enjoys wide majority support of all Texans (70-80% range in many demographics, including minority communities).

Hint: even a monkey knows not to fondle the turds it intends to throw.

(look at how Manichean the self-styled moderate can be. ex: "anyone who disagrees with me s a nazi....and if not, I'll make it up.")

And these are the people who insist Paxton is a sleaze.
Strickland runs the Defend Texas Liberty PAC for Dunn and Wilks. They give big money to Paxton and Patrick. Strickland invites Fuentes in for a 7 hour visit. Fuentes claims to be an Adlolf Hitler admirer and an antisemite.

As a professional Republican I would hope you would condemn this meeting instead if defending it.

And Paxton is a sleaze
No, the sleaze is focusing on one internet troll with limited following rather than the institutional anti-semitism throughout unions, universities, and the Democrat Party which is throwing thousands of hard core fasicsts into the streets changing "gas the Jews" in cities all across our great country.

You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

If he's convicted of something, I will be at the forefront of the impeachment crowd.
Just curious. If Trump is convicted of something will you be in the forefront of the impeachment crowd?
OsoCoreyell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:


Anytime you're whipping an impeachment vote for a member in your own party, it's a bad sign. Pure power play.


But it made for a very weak case in the Senate, as deeper inspection illustrated all the short-comings, to include allegations of fact that turned out to untrue. I mean, you had prosecution witnesses who admitted, under oath, that they had no evidence to support their allegations. I mean, geez......

Bottom line is, if Paxton was the kind of crook you feel so deeply he is, the case would have been a lot stronger and you wouldn't have to make up nonsense like "one vote short of conviction."




What a joke. This just shows that you have no idea how our system of government is designed to work. Impeachement MAY involve a crime, but it need NOT involve a crime. Serious ethical breaches, abuse of office, all of these are grounds for impeachment that may or may not have a criminal component. The outcome frainkly had nothing to do with evidence or guilt. The GOP Texas Senators were craven and weak - afraid to do what they knew was right. Afraid that they would be viewed as giving the other side a "win" or opposing Trump. Well, the political trial turned out how it did, and that doesn't mean Paxton isn't a scumbag. He is. And shameless the way he humiliated his wife publicly and then refused to step down. Mark my words - the Texas GOP will pay a price for this. They'll lose control of a state that they have no business losing control of. Within 5 years, the idiot frings of the Texas GOP will do what the idiot fringe of the National GOP is doign - setting up to LOSE consistently.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Red Queen shrieks. Osos thinks he's guilty, so he is guilty no matter what the trial results say.

For the record, I don't like or trust Paxton, but son that was some straight outta East Germany logic right there.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.