Bidens Pressured Burisma Founder into Paying $10 Million Bribe

99,489 Views | 786 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Doc Holliday
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Cobretti said:



Man! 1,000 e-mails to talk about the weather. These guys must love talking about the weather.
beat me to it
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

BearFan33 said:

But, but Orange man Bad!

For liberals it's ok to sell out the country, just don't hurt their feelings or offend them with the truth.
Trump is bad for the nation
Gender "reassignment" surgery is bad for children. "Social Justice" is bad for the rule of law. "Climate Change Crisis" is bad for Americans. Democrats are bad for black people. Liberalism is bad for humanity.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Waco1947 said:

So far only smoke.
Like what Americans experience from Canadian fires?
No like NY Post and Washington Examiner only publish smoke because they are right wing stodgies who hate Biden

Biden used a pseudonym as VP for over 5000 official e-mails but you aren't the least bit concerned....sounds legit.
The evidence is out there for all the world to see. Mountains more of evidence coming. Anybody protecting Biden at this point are as corrupt and dirty as he is. Waco1947 is at the top of the list.
No mountains only hearsay and smoke.
You're blindfold is on too tight.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Waco1947 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

Waco1947 said:

So far only smoke.
Like what Americans experience from Canadian fires?
No like NY Post and Washington Examiner only publish smoke because they are right wing stodgies who hate Biden

Biden used a pseudonym as VP for over 5000 official e-mails but you aren't the least bit concerned....sounds legit.
The evidence is out there for all the world to see. Mountains more of evidence coming. Anybody protecting Biden at this point are as corrupt and dirty as he is. Waco1947 is at the top of the list.
No mountains only hearsay and smoke.
So do you think the National Archives is making up that Biden used a bunch of aliases? Yes. Those people are MAGA deplorables

Do you think everyone that has testified is lying except for China Joe? Absolutely

Do you think the emails, texts, and messages from Hunter's laptop are all "Russian disinformation?" No. It's misinformation

Do you think it is a coincidence that China Joe bragged about getting the prosecutor fired that was investigating the Ukrainian company that was bribing Joe? There's no evidence

Where do you think Hunter, Joe, and the rest of the Biden Crime Family got their millions? What legitimate line of work have they had that warranted these paydays? Public speaking and book deals

Are you so blindly tribal that you refuse to believe anything that implicates a Democrat? I don't understand the question
I took the liberty of answering for wacko1947
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Waco1947 said:

BearFan33 said:

But, but Orange man Bad!

For liberals it's ok to sell out the country, just don't hurt their feelings or offend them with the truth.
Trump is bad for the nation
How? Specially how is Trump "bad" for the nation? He's a threat to the democrat party

What policies of Trump did you disagree? All of them. Even the ones that benefited black people.

Why did you think record economic growth, Middle East peace deals, protecting working people, and no foreign military engagements were bad for the nation? The peace deals just make Israel richer. You're not protecting working people, just the rich people. Trump never should have killed that innocent terrorist.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Cobretti said:



Man! 1,000 e-mails to talk about the weather. These guys must love talking about the weather.
I'd hate to see how many emails were exchanged griping about their aches and pains.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Cobretti said:


just talking about the weather and Bidens sick child
The one that died on the battlefield in Vietnam?
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are still evidence free with regards to your assertions.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

You are still evidence free with regards to your assertions.
"You can lead a liberal to the facts, but you can't make him think."
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Waco1947 said:

You are still evidence free with regards to your assertions.
"You can lead a liberal to the facts, but you can't make him think."
So far I have seen no "facts' only assertions
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"even my enemies may be telling the truth against my friends"
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Waco1947 said:

You are still evidence free with regards to your assertions.
"You can lead a liberal to the facts, but you can't make him think."
So far I have seen no "facts' only assertions
No, you're just stupid and tribal.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

Top officials have used such aliases in the past for emails, including former Attorneys General Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch. During the Obama administration, the practice was defended by then-White House press secretary Jay Carney, who assured the public that any such emails would still be subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and congressional inquiries. He added, "We do not use and should not use private email accounts for work."

The problem is that there was "work" being discussed on some of these emails, including official foreign travel plans and the hiring of associates of Hunter for high-level positions. More importantly, some emails are relevant to the clients of Biden's son. Biden has previously lied that he knew nothing of these dealings, but these emails could reveal even more about his knowledge and involvement.

Congress is investigating more than $20 million that was transferred to members of the Biden family from foreign sources through a labyrinth of shell companies and accounts. Even the Washington Post has been forced to admit that the president has lied in the past about aspects of Hunter's dealings. Devon Archer recently confirmed that Joe Biden's long-standing denial of any knowledge of their business dealings is "categorically false."
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

You are still evidence free with regards to your assertions.
Kind of like systemic racism or that white supremacy is the biggest threat to mankind (or democracy - you pick) or that being white means you're privileged?
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Waco1947 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Waco1947 said:

You are still evidence free with regards to your assertions.
"You can lead a liberal to the facts, but you can't make him think."
So far I have seen no "facts' only assertions
No, you're just stupid and tribal.
Apparently thousands of emails under fake names, multiple shell companies, millions of dollars flowing in and then out to biden family members, text messages, video tape evidence of the guy bragging about withholding money unless someone was fired, whistleblower testimony in front of congress... well, in biden's America, that's just not evidence anymore.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Waco1947 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Waco1947 said:

You are still evidence free with regards to your assertions.
"You can lead a liberal to the facts, but you can't make him think."
So far I have seen no "facts' only assertions
No, you're just stupid and tribal.
Apparently thousands of emails under fake names, multiple shell companies, millions of dollars flowing in and then out to biden family members, text messages, video tape evidence of the guy bragging about withholding money unless someone was fired, whistleblower testimony in front of congress... well, in biden's America, that's just not evidence anymore.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The main reason we need a serious investigation of Biden is also the main reason it will never happen. Any such investigation would likely reveal his hand in corruptly promoting and profiting from the Ukraine war. As much as that might hurt Biden, it would also harm the agenda of the warmongers who still dominate the GOP.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

The main reason we need a serious investigation of Biden is also the main reason it will never happen. Any such investigation would likely reveal his hand in corruptly promoting and profiting from the Ukraine war. As much as that might hurt Biden, it would also harm the agenda of the warmongers who still dominate the GOP.


Trump & whitrerock?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Sam Lowry said:

The main reason we need a serious investigation of Biden is also the main reason it will never happen. Any such investigation would likely reveal his hand in corruptly promoting and profiting from the Ukraine war. As much as that might hurt Biden, it would also harm the agenda of the warmongers who still dominate the GOP.


Trump & whitrerock?
I'm not sure what WR thinks of Trump's foreign policy. They seem to differ, at least on the surface.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti said:


Sounds like every LWNJ - if you do not have a video of China Joe accepting the Chinese money then it did not happen and all T'RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION.

It kind of gives you sympathy for those that read things like the WaPo and think they're getting what we used to call "news."
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Cobretti said:


Sounds like every LWNJ - if you do not have a video of China Joe accepting the Chinese money then it did not happen and all T'RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION.

It kind of gives you sympathy for those that read things like the WaPo and think they're getting what we used to call "news."

Basically imagine this scenario

Report - Coach Aranda, you lost to a SunBelt team and people are worried about the team's performance and motiviation over the last 12 months.

Aranda - "Ok. what do you want me to say? What am i supposed to do about that - coach or something? I'm walking out of this ambush!"
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

The main reason we need a serious investigation of Biden is also the main reason it will never happen. Any such investigation would likely reveal his hand in corruptly promoting and profiting from the Ukraine war. As much as that might hurt Biden, it would also harm the agenda of the warmongers who still dominate the GOP.
Sam. I'm confused. In Vietnam it was the Democrats "hell no, we won't go"that forced LBJ into retirement. I am surprised they support Ukraine defense. It appears to me that Trumpers do not support giving money to Ukraine. Am I correct? Has everyone switched hawkishness?
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

Sam Lowry said:

The main reason we need a serious investigation of Biden is also the main reason it will never happen. Any such investigation would likely reveal his hand in corruptly promoting and profiting from the Ukraine war. As much as that might hurt Biden, it would also harm the agenda of the warmongers who still dominate the GOP.
Sam. I'm confused. In Vietnam it was the Democrats "hell no, we won't go"that forced LBJ into retirement. I am surprised they support Ukraine defense. It appears to me that Trumpers do not support giving money to Ukraine. Am I correct? Has everyone switched hawkishness?


Think the left still has a 5-3 advantage starting wars in post 1900.

But the answer to the Ukraine boondoggle likely is Burisma payments to the Biden's. Question is who was the Padawan?

https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/russia-ukraine-war-news-1-24-23/h_28da6b76c14ff1e68f1cb1c873d9049f

Ukraine's deputy defense minister Viacheslav Shapovalov has resigned after allegations of corruption surfaced in the media.

Shapovalov submitted his resignation after a "campaign of accusations related to the procurement of food supply (to the Armed Forces of Ukraine)," according to a statement from the ministry, which described the allegations as "unfounded and baseless."

The minister was responsible for the logistics of the Armed Forces, the statement said.

On Monday, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine said that it was investigating "high-profile media reports about possible abuses by the Ministry of Defense in the procurement of food for the military."
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

Sam Lowry said:

The main reason we need a serious investigation of Biden is also the main reason it will never happen. Any such investigation would likely reveal his hand in corruptly promoting and profiting from the Ukraine war. As much as that might hurt Biden, it would also harm the agenda of the warmongers who still dominate the GOP.
Sam. I'm confused. In Vietnam it was the Democrats "hell no, we won't go"that forced LBJ into retirement. I am surprised they support Ukraine defense. It appears to me that Trumpers do not support giving money to Ukraine. Am I correct? Has everyone switched hawkishness?
Progressives have always been known for ambitious foreign policies...Wilson, FDR, LBJ. Clinton was more cautious about direct intervention, but it was he who started NATO's trend from a defensive to an offensive alliance. Republicans have a history of "isolationism," to which Trump has signaled a return. But both party establishments are very much in the same pro-war camp.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Sam Lowry said:

The main reason we need a serious investigation of Biden is also the main reason it will never happen. Any such investigation would likely reveal his hand in corruptly promoting and profiting from the Ukraine war. As much as that might hurt Biden, it would also harm the agenda of the warmongers who still dominate the GOP.
Sam. I'm confused. In Vietnam it was the Democrats "hell no, we won't go"that forced LBJ into retirement. I am surprised they support Ukraine defense. It appears to me that Trumpers do not support giving money to Ukraine. Am I correct? Has everyone switched hawkishness?


Think the left still has a 5-3 advantage starting wars in post 1900.

But the answer to the Ukraine boondoggle likely is Burisma payments to the Biden's. Question is who was the Padawan?

https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/russia-ukraine-war-news-1-24-23/h_28da6b76c14ff1e68f1cb1c873d9049f

Ukraine's deputy defense minister Viacheslav Shapovalov has resigned after allegations of corruption surfaced in the media.

Shapovalov submitted his resignation after a "campaign of accusations related to the procurement of food supply (to the Armed Forces of Ukraine)," according to a statement from the ministry, which described the allegations as "unfounded and baseless."

The minister was responsible for the logistics of the Armed Forces, the statement said.

On Monday, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine said that it was investigating "high-profile media reports about possible abuses by the Ministry of Defense in the procurement of food for the military."

And they just replaced the top defense minister. Two things we can be pretty sure of:

1. It's not Zelensky's call.
2. It's not for corruption.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Sam Lowry said:

The main reason we need a serious investigation of Biden is also the main reason it will never happen. Any such investigation would likely reveal his hand in corruptly promoting and profiting from the Ukraine war. As much as that might hurt Biden, it would also harm the agenda of the warmongers who still dominate the GOP.
Sam. I'm confused. In Vietnam it was the Democrats "hell no, we won't go"that forced LBJ into retirement. I am surprised they support Ukraine defense. It appears to me that Trumpers do not support giving money to Ukraine. Am I correct? Has everyone switched hawkishness?


Think the left still has a 5-3 advantage starting wars in post 1900.

But the answer to the Ukraine boondoggle likely is Burisma payments to the Biden's. Question is who was the Padawan?

https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/russia-ukraine-war-news-1-24-23/h_28da6b76c14ff1e68f1cb1c873d9049f

Ukraine's deputy defense minister Viacheslav Shapovalov has resigned after allegations of corruption surfaced in the media.

Shapovalov submitted his resignation after a "campaign of accusations related to the procurement of food supply (to the Armed Forces of Ukraine)," according to a statement from the ministry, which described the allegations as "unfounded and baseless."

The minister was responsible for the logistics of the Armed Forces, the statement said.

On Monday, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine said that it was investigating "high-profile media reports about possible abuses by the Ministry of Defense in the procurement of food for the military."

And they just replaced the top defense minister. Two things we can be pretty sure of:

1. It's not Zelensky's call.
2. It's not for corruption.
Good point. He probably forgot "10% for The Big Guy."
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Sam Lowry said:

The main reason we need a serious investigation of Biden is also the main reason it will never happen. Any such investigation would likely reveal his hand in corruptly promoting and profiting from the Ukraine war. As much as that might hurt Biden, it would also harm the agenda of the warmongers who still dominate the GOP.
Sam. I'm confused. In Vietnam it was the Democrats "hell no, we won't go"that forced LBJ into retirement. I am surprised they support Ukraine defense. It appears to me that Trumpers do not support giving money to Ukraine. Am I correct? Has everyone switched hawkishness?


Think the left still has a 5-3 advantage starting wars in post 1900.

But the answer to the Ukraine boondoggle likely is Burisma payments to the Biden's. Question is who was the Padawan?

https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/russia-ukraine-war-news-1-24-23/h_28da6b76c14ff1e68f1cb1c873d9049f

Ukraine's deputy defense minister Viacheslav Shapovalov has resigned after allegations of corruption surfaced in the media.

Shapovalov submitted his resignation after a "campaign of accusations related to the procurement of food supply (to the Armed Forces of Ukraine)," according to a statement from the ministry, which described the allegations as "unfounded and baseless."

The minister was responsible for the logistics of the Armed Forces, the statement said.

On Monday, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine said that it was investigating "high-profile media reports about possible abuses by the Ministry of Defense in the procurement of food for the military."

And they just replaced the top defense minister. Two things we can be pretty sure of:

1. It's not Zelensky's call.
2. It's not for corruption.
Good point. He probably forgot "10% for The Big Guy."
LOL, right…it's for "corruption" as in not enough of it.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Sam Lowry said:

The main reason we need a serious investigation of Biden is also the main reason it will never happen. Any such investigation would likely reveal his hand in corruptly promoting and profiting from the Ukraine war. As much as that might hurt Biden, it would also harm the agenda of the warmongers who still dominate the GOP.
Sam. I'm confused. In Vietnam it was the Democrats "hell no, we won't go"that forced LBJ into retirement. I am surprised they support Ukraine defense. It appears to me that Trumpers do not support giving money to Ukraine. Am I correct? Has everyone switched hawkishness?


Think the left still has a 5-3 advantage starting wars in post 1900.

But the answer to the Ukraine boondoggle likely is Burisma payments to the Biden's. Question is who was the Padawan?

https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/russia-ukraine-war-news-1-24-23/h_28da6b76c14ff1e68f1cb1c873d9049f

Ukraine's deputy defense minister Viacheslav Shapovalov has resigned after allegations of corruption surfaced in the media.

Shapovalov submitted his resignation after a "campaign of accusations related to the procurement of food supply (to the Armed Forces of Ukraine)," according to a statement from the ministry, which described the allegations as "unfounded and baseless."

The minister was responsible for the logistics of the Armed Forces, the statement said.

On Monday, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine said that it was investigating "high-profile media reports about possible abuses by the Ministry of Defense in the procurement of food for the military."

And they just replaced the top defense minister. Two things we can be pretty sure of:

1. It's not Zelensky's call.
2. It's not for corruption.
Good point. He probably forgot "10% for The Big Guy."
LOL, right…it's for "corruption" as in not enough of it.
But the LWNJ tell us when The Biden Crime Family secures bribes from foreign governments where China intervenes it's not corruption but a father looking after his coke-addicted son boning his dead son's wife.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.