NEW: @JudiciaryGOP subpoenas AUSA Lesley Wolf. Allegations include Hunter Biden probe “deviated from standard investigative procedures, “Ordering investigators to remove from a search warrant any reference to “Political Figure 1,”that is, President Biden.” Deposition Dec. 7 pic.twitter.com/ltAruYSUJc

— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) November 22, 2023

House Republicans subpoena prosecutor in Hunter Biden investigation via ⁦@CBSNews⁩ https://t.co/3ur7QvWymo

— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) November 22, 2023

I don't know if exposing how the sausage of DOJ corruption was made will matter in the end if the culprits are not punished in some substantial way.

I suppose if you could get the political actors to quit the DOJ/FBI it would be a good start.

NEW 🚨🚨🚨

First son Hunter Biden has offered to publicly testify before the House Oversight Committee investigating his business ties.

Hunter, 53, proposed to appear on Dec. 13 in a letter sent to the panel, obtained by NBC News. https://t.co/98lWwRi9pC

— Jon Levine (@LevineJonathan) November 28, 2023

Don’t get this decision. Surely sunlight matters. https://t.co/M4f9o55RAZ

— Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) November 28, 2023

However, I agree that Hunter Biden and his expensive lawyers don’t get to dictate terms — and that the 5-minute structure of public hearings is sub par. https://t.co/7FcjsGIU7L

— Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) November 28, 2023

We are glad that Hunter Biden has decided to cooperate and we look forward to hearing from him in a deposition on December 13 and subsequently at a public hearing.

— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) November 28, 2023

Hunter will appear in the place set by the Committee. He can choose his answers, but not his forum.https://t.co/pixJqZF38c

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) November 28, 2023

Donald Trump Jr. sat for two depositions with Congress.

Why can’t Hunter Biden?

— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) November 28, 2023

BearFan33 said:

---

I don't know if exposing how the sausage of DOJ corruption was made will matter in the end if the culprits are not punished in some substantial way.

I suppose if you could get the political actors to quit the DOJ/FBI it would be a good start.

---

Good luck with that. The FBI, CIA, and Department of "Justice" are laughing their asses off at all of us. At the same time they are giving the American people the finger. They are now just an extension of the Democrat Party.

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

Waco1947 said:

---

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

---

It is hardly a threat to the republic that some citizens don't trust the government. The threat to democracy comes when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law, as I am sure you would not try to do.

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

---

It is hardly a threat to the republic that some citizens don't trust the government. The threat to democracy comes when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law, as I am sure you would not try to do.

---

Silenced? Who is silenced? Name names.

Waco1947 said:

---

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

---

Joe Biden should be swinging from the gallows for treason and his accomplices should be imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay for their roles in selling out our country.

Will never happen. The corruption runs deep and has metastasized to the point of no return.

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

---

It is hardly a threat to the republic that some citizens don't trust the government. The threat to democracy comes when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law, as I am sure you would not try to do.

---

Silenced? Who is silenced? Name names.

---

I said that I am sure you would not try to silence dissent by force of law. Why are you asking me to "Name names"?

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

---

It is hardly a threat to the republic that some citizens don't trust the government. The threat to democracy comes when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law, as I am sure you would not try to do.

---

Silenced? Who is silenced? Name names.

---

I said that I am sure you would not try to silence dissent by force of law. Why are you asking me to "Name names"
These Whos "when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law," Who is the someone silenced by force of law?

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

---

It is hardly a threat to the republic that some citizens don't trust the government. The threat to democracy comes when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law, as I am sure you would not try to do.

---

Silenced? Who is silenced? Name names.

---

I said that I am sure you would not try to silence dissent by force of law. Why are you asking me to "Name names"
These Whos "when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law," Who is the someone silenced by force of law?

---

---

Is your answer in BOLD?

Osodecentx said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

---

It is hardly a threat to the republic that some citizens don't trust the government. The threat to democracy comes when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law, as I am sure you would not try to do.

---

Silenced? Who is silenced? Name names.

---

I said that I am sure you would not try to silence dissent by force of law. Why are you asking me to "Name names"
These Whos "when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law," Who is the someone silenced by force of law?

---

---

Is your answer in BOLD?

---

The question is why he is asking me to name names when I didn't say anyone was necessarily being silenced by force of law, just that the threat to democracy isn't so much as in distrust of government (although that isn't great) as it is in government suppressing that dissent. So, no, what he has bolded isn't an answer.

Trump has had leftist judges attempt to legally silence him and he is currently a front runner for president of the United States. Every conservative that had their posts censored by social media platforms at the direction of the government could also be counted here. Wonder if ol nutball here will count them or we will get, "yeah but they deserved it!" I suspect that would be the response no matter who was named as being silenced by the government.

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

---

It is hardly a threat to the republic that some citizens don't trust the government. The threat to democracy comes when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law, as I am sure you would not try to do.

---

Silenced? Who is silenced? Name names.

---

Donald Trump for starters. Your government wants to silence him by putting him in prison. The FBI and DOJ have played a major role in his political persecution.

The American people are fed up with this. I am pissed and am no Donald Trump fan.

🚨🚨🚨

“House Republicans roll out 'one-stop shop' Biden impeachment inquiry website”https://t.co/X0OxNnFryo

— House Republicans (@HouseGOP) November 29, 2023

Biden Impeachment Inquiry

D. C. Bear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

---

It is hardly a threat to the republic that some citizens don't trust the government. The threat to democracy comes when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law, as I am sure you would not try to do.

---

Silenced? Who is silenced? Name names.

---

I said that I am sure you would not try to silence dissent by force of law. Why are you asking me to "Name names"
These Whos "when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law," Who is the someone silenced by force of law?

---

---

Is your answer in BOLD?

---

The question is why he is asking me to name names when I didn't say anyone was necessarily being silenced by force of law, just that the threat to democracy isn't so much as in distrust of government (although that isn't great) as it is in government suppressing that dissent. So, no, what he has bolded isn't an answer.

---

Because your assertion is nonsense without proof. You are simply dodging the question

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

---

It is hardly a threat to the republic that some citizens don't trust the government. The threat to democracy comes when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law, as I am sure you would not try to do.

---

Silenced? Who is silenced? Name names.

---

I said that I am sure you would not try to silence dissent by force of law. Why are you asking me to "Name names"
These Whos "when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law," Who is the someone silenced by force of law?

---

---

Is your answer in BOLD?

---

The question is why he is asking me to name names when I didn't say anyone was necessarily being silenced by force of law, just that the threat to democracy isn't so much as in distrust of government (although that isn't great) as it is in government suppressing that dissent. So, no, what he has bolded isn't an answer.

---

Because your assertion is nonsense without proof. You are simply dodging the question

---

You wouldn't know proof if it bit you in the lBGQTRWS poop hole. Hell, you still haven't figured out what hearsay evidence is or is not.

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Craziness about the doj/fbi You are a threat to democracy assailing these respect institutions.

---

It is hardly a threat to the republic that some citizens don't trust the government. The threat to democracy comes when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law, as I am sure you would not try to do.

---

Silenced? Who is silenced? Name names.

---

I said that I am sure you would not try to silence dissent by force of law. Why are you asking me to "Name names"
These Whos "when someone seeks to silence that dissent by force of law," Who is the someone silenced by force of law?

---

---

Is your answer in BOLD?

---

The question is why he is asking me to name names when I didn't say anyone was necessarily being silenced by force of law, just that the threat to democracy isn't so much as in distrust of government (although that isn't great) as it is in government suppressing that dissent. So, no, what he has bolded isn't an answer.

---

Because your assertion is nonsense without proof. You are simply dodging the question

---

So, you want me to provide evidence that suppression of political opinion is a threat to democracy? Seriously?

You made a pretty clear insinuation about who's "political opinions" are being suppressed, don't try to play coy and run away from it now that you've been challenged to defend it.

If there was any doubt, Wangchung helpfully spelled out what you were implying just a few posts later.

HuMcK said:

---

You made a pretty clear insinuation about who's "political opinions" are being suppressed, don't try to play coy and run away from it now that you've been challenged to defend it.

If there was any doubt, Wangchung helpfully spelled out what you were implying just a few posts later.

---

Sorry, but your inference is simply incorrect. My point was independent of any particular political side, be it left or right. The greater threat to democracy is found not in dissent, be it from the right or the left, but in a government, be it on the right or on the left, that seeks to suppress that dissent.

I am not inclined to defend a position I did not take.

🚨 #BREAKING: @Jim_Jordan and @RepJamesComer Demand Transcribed Interviews with Blue Star Strategies Executives

Our committees have obtained information suggesting that Blue Star Strategies was involved in the arrangement between Hunter Biden and Burisma, and believe that…

— House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸 (@JudiciaryGOP) November 29, 2023

🚨 BREAKING 🚨

In a 2018 email, a bank flagged serious concerns about the China money Hunter Biden received – $40,000 of which ultimately landed in Joe Biden’s bank account.

In the email, the bank’s money laundering investigator highlighted:

- Erratic Payments

- No Obvious… pic.twitter.com/XjxYnM0cfn

— Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) November 29, 2023

https://t.co/vFFpfCHNmX pic.twitter.com/WL0rW0C63F

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) November 29, 2023

HuMcK said:

---

You made a pretty clear insinuation about who's "political opinions" are being suppressed, don't try to play coy and run away from it now that you've been challenged to defend it.

If there was any doubt, Wangchung helpfully spelled out what you were implying just a few posts later.

---

I merely answered the resident window licker's question. I never claimed to be speaking for D.C.

There are thousands of pages of suspicious activity reports at Treasury from several banks that raise the same concerns as this bank’s money laundering investigator. This isn’t a one off incident. The Democrats know that, and it’s embarrassing they continue to defend this corrupt… https://t.co/m9lUETtsgc

— Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) November 30, 2023

Rep. @danielsgoldman on Hunter's laptop: Hard drives can be manipulated by Rudy Giuliani, or Russia" pic.twitter.com/vkWuwoSJLR

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) November 30, 2023

Cobretti said:

---

Rep. @danielsgoldman on Hunter's laptop: Hard drives can be manipulated by Rudy Giuliani, or Russia" pic.twitter.com/vkWuwoSJLR

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) November 30, 2023

---

so true, hard drives in the FBIs possession can be manipulated by Russia

Sheeple!

...Truth has never been a particularly appealing option for politicians, particularly when it must come with an acknowledgment of past culpability in spreading disinformation. Leon Panetta also doubled down recently in claiming that the laptop may still be Russian disinformation.

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) December 1, 2023

Oversight Democrats just tried to be cute and play Biden family lawyers and inadvertently made the argument that Hunter Biden failed to register as a foreign agent.

The President’s son failing to register as a foreign agent can be imprisonment for up to 5 years or a $250k fine. https://t.co/LzEMXD3Ye3

— Wendell Husebø (@WendellHusebo) November 30, 2023

Seemingly a far cry from no knowledge / no discussions / not “in business” / whatever the latest WH spin is… https://t.co/v33wzH0vqv

— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) December 4, 2023

So it appears that Hunter paid his dad a grand total of...$4140, in 2018 when his dad was a private citizen...

Y'all understand that you look progressively more desperate and gullible after each pitiful "revelation", right?