Netanyahu said "we are at war,"

527,500 Views | 6919 Replies | Last: 19 hrs ago by whiterock
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

Millions more just like these filing pigs.



Israel is doomed .

They have at least 400 nukes and a 1st world economy and military.

Why would they be doomed?

Their largest neighbor Egypt (who is about as militarily competent as Mexico) even has a peace treaty with them that they have honored since 1979

Not only that....but fertility rates are a major sign of if your nation has a future. And Israel has a fertility rate of 3.0 (while most of the Europe and N. America are below replacement).

Israel's population is growing...with ultra-orthodox growing very fast.

[Israel's population will surge by 70 percent, to almost 16 million, by 2050, with the ultra-Orthodox accounting for about a third of all Israeli Jews]

How are they doomed? Can you name a European country that is going to have 70% population growth over the next 30 years and a 3.0 fertility rate? Its all the countries in Europe that you should be worried about...not Israel.


Israel does not have anything approaching 400 nukes.

And what nukes they do have are unusable for all practical purposes due to their country's small size and vulnerability to nuclear retaliation.

Israel remains surrounded by Muslim populations who hate them irregardless what treaties their leadership signs.

Muslim populations in the region are expanding far more rapidly than Jewish populations.

And Israel's own people are racked by increasing division.



You are not making an argument for the defense of Israel.

You are making an argument that Israel will never be safe in that part of the world.

So it either has to up and move to Madagascar or its has to genocide the entire Muslim population of the middle east and obliterate 18 sovereign countries over there?

After all...nukes, advanced economy, great & growing demographics, powerful military, ultra powerful USA ally....none of these things are still enough for Israel to be safe.

The anti-Zionist Jews I guess were right then.....trying to turn European Jewry into Levant farm peasants in the middle east was a mistake from the get go.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Jack Bauer said:

So we have a ceasefire and then what...nothing until Hamas attacks again.

Actions have consequences.

Sometimes inaction does as well. I trust Israel will make wise decisions while ignoring the white noise from fascists like Obama & many in the UN. They are antisemitism so their opinion is worthless.
Nothing is moving in or out of Gaza without the IDF knowing it. One thing about the Israeli's they are not going to put their security at risk for anyone.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

historian said:

Jack Bauer said:

So we have a ceasefire and then what...nothing until Hamas attacks again.

Actions have consequences.

Sometimes inaction does as well. I trust Israel will make wise decisions while ignoring the white noise from fascists like Obama & many in the UN. They are antisemitism so their opinion is worthless.
Nothing is moving in or out of Gaza without the IDF knowing it. One thing about the Israeli's they are not going to put their security at risk for anyone.

How the hell did they get caught sleeping in the first place is what I want to know.

They had Gaza surrounded by barbed wire and Concrete walls and military outposts and 24-7 reconnaissance.

How did a break out of Hamas fighters even occur and how the hell did they get more than a few steps in Israel without tanks and attack helicopters from the IDF swarming down on them.

Hamas fighters penetrated deep into Israeli territory and were seemly able to rampage at will for two days.....how the Hell does that happen?




Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:






They're just peaceful protesters
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

FLBear5630 said:

historian said:

Jack Bauer said:

So we have a ceasefire and then what...nothing until Hamas attacks again.

Actions have consequences.

Sometimes inaction does as well. I trust Israel will make wise decisions while ignoring the white noise from fascists like Obama & many in the UN. They are antisemitism so their opinion is worthless.
Nothing is moving in or out of Gaza without the IDF knowing it. One thing about the Israeli's they are not going to put their security at risk for anyone.

How the hell did they get caught sleeping in the first place is what I want to know.

They had Gaza surrounded by barbed wire and Concrete walls and military outposts and 24-7 reconnaissance.

How did a break out of Hamas fighters even occur and how the hell did they get more than a few steps in Israel without tanks and attack helicopters from the IDF swarming down on them.

Hamas fighters penetrated deep into Israeli territory and were seemly able to rampage at will for two days.....how the Hell does that happen?


I would say tunnels. I would bet the same thing is happening in N Korea. The question I have is who has tunneling tech? Does Iran?
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Religious wars are stupid.
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

Religious wars are stupid.
We should only fighter over money, oil and other natural resources. We should also fight over Whataburger. I will defend Whataburger as the best fast food chain burger on the planet. I will die defending Whataburger's right to exist.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whiskey Pete said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Religious wars are stupid.
We should only fighter over money, oil and other natural resources. We should also fight over Whataburger. I will defend Whataburger as the best fast food chain burger on the planet. I will die defending Whataburger's right to exist.
Why? They are an Illinois company now.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

Millions more just like these filing pigs.



Israel is doomed .

They have at least 400 nukes and a 1st world economy and military.

Why would they be doomed?

Their largest neighbor Egypt (who is about as militarily competent as Mexico) even has a peace treaty with them that they have honored since 1979

Not only that....but fertility rates are a major sign of if your nation has a future. And Israel has a fertility rate of 3.0 (while most of the Europe and N. America are below replacement).

Israel's population is growing...with ultra-orthodox growing very fast.

[Israel's population will surge by 70 percent, to almost 16 million, by 2050, with the ultra-Orthodox accounting for about a third of all Israeli Jews]

How are they doomed? Can you name a European country that is going to have 70% population growth over the next 30 years and a 3.0 fertility rate? Its all the countries in Europe that you should be worried about...not Israel.


Israel does not have anything approaching 400 nukes.

And what nukes they do have are unusable for all practical purposes due to their country's small size and vulnerability to nuclear retaliation.

Israel remains surrounded by Muslim populations who hate them irregardless what treaties their leadership signs.

Muslim populations in the region are expanding far more rapidly than Jewish populations.

And Israel's own people are racked by increasing division.


Israel probably has around 50 nukes. That is more than enough to make sure their enemies go down with them if the survival of the State or People is put in question.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrecks Quan Dough said:

KaiBear said:

Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

Millions more just like these filing pigs.



Israel is doomed .

They have at least 400 nukes and a 1st world economy and military.

Why would they be doomed?

Their largest neighbor Egypt (who is about as militarily competent as Mexico) even has a peace treaty with them that they have honored since 1979

Not only that....but fertility rates are a major sign of if your nation has a future. And Israel has a fertility rate of 3.0 (while most of the Europe and N. America are below replacement).

Israel's population is growing...with ultra-orthodox growing very fast.

[Israel's population will surge by 70 percent, to almost 16 million, by 2050, with the ultra-Orthodox accounting for about a third of all Israeli Jews]

How are they doomed? Can you name a European country that is going to have 70% population growth over the next 30 years and a 3.0 fertility rate? Its all the countries in Europe that you should be worried about...not Israel.


Israel does not have anything approaching 400 nukes.

And what nukes they do have are unusable for all practical purposes due to their country's small size and vulnerability to nuclear retaliation.

Israel remains surrounded by Muslim populations who hate them irregardless what treaties their leadership signs.

Muslim populations in the region are expanding far more rapidly than Jewish populations.

And Israel's own people are racked by increasing division.


Israel probably has around 50 nukes.


From 30-50.

400 is rediculous.

Can not see a situation where Israel uses nukes first.

Also can not see the United States supporting Israel more than another 10-15 years.

So unless Israel goes all in this time around, including taking on Iran if need be; the Jewish State will be extinct within 10-30 years.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrecks Quan Dough said:

KaiBear said:

Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

Millions more just like these filing pigs.



Israel is doomed .

They have at least 400 nukes and a 1st world economy and military.

Why would they be doomed?

Their largest neighbor Egypt (who is about as militarily competent as Mexico) even has a peace treaty with them that they have honored since 1979

Not only that....but fertility rates are a major sign of if your nation has a future. And Israel has a fertility rate of 3.0 (while most of the Europe and N. America are below replacement).

Israel's population is growing...with ultra-orthodox growing very fast.

[Israel's population will surge by 70 percent, to almost 16 million, by 2050, with the ultra-Orthodox accounting for about a third of all Israeli Jews]

How are they doomed? Can you name a European country that is going to have 70% population growth over the next 30 years and a 3.0 fertility rate? Its all the countries in Europe that you should be worried about...not Israel.


Israel does not have anything approaching 400 nukes.

And what nukes they do have are unusable for all practical purposes due to their country's small size and vulnerability to nuclear retaliation.

Israel remains surrounded by Muslim populations who hate them irregardless what treaties their leadership signs.

Muslim populations in the region are expanding far more rapidly than Jewish populations.

And Israel's own people are racked by increasing division.


Israel probably has around 50 nukes. That is more than enough to make sure their enemies go down with them if the survival of the State or People is put in question.


More like at least 80 to a possible 400

[Israel is estimated to possess somewhere between 75 and 400 nuclear warheads. One possible motivation for nuclear ambiguity is deterrence with minimum political cost.]

They have had them since they developed them with South Africa

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0096340214555409
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

KaiBear said:

Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

Millions more just like these filing pigs.



Israel is doomed .

They have at least 400 nukes and a 1st world economy and military.

Why would they be doomed?

Their largest neighbor Egypt (who is about as militarily competent as Mexico) even has a peace treaty with them that they have honored since 1979

Not only that....but fertility rates are a major sign of if your nation has a future. And Israel has a fertility rate of 3.0 (while most of the Europe and N. America are below replacement).

Israel's population is growing...with ultra-orthodox growing very fast.

[Israel's population will surge by 70 percent, to almost 16 million, by 2050, with the ultra-Orthodox accounting for about a third of all Israeli Jews]

How are they doomed? Can you name a European country that is going to have 70% population growth over the next 30 years and a 3.0 fertility rate? Its all the countries in Europe that you should be worried about...not Israel.


Israel does not have anything approaching 400 nukes.

And what nukes they do have are unusable for all practical purposes due to their country's small size and vulnerability to nuclear retaliation.

Israel remains surrounded by Muslim populations who hate them irregardless what treaties their leadership signs.

Muslim populations in the region are expanding far more rapidly than Jewish populations.

And Israel's own people are racked by increasing division.


Israel probably has around 50 nukes. That is more than enough to make sure their enemies go down with them if the survival of the State or People is put in question.


More like at least 80 to a possible 400

[Israel is estimated to possess somewhere between 75 and 400 nuclear warheads. One possible motivation for nuclear ambiguity is deterrence with minimum political cost.]

They have had them since they developed them with South Africa

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0096340214555409
The French sold the Israelis the technology.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrecks Quan Dough said:

Redbrickbear said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

KaiBear said:

Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

Millions more just like these filing pigs.



Israel is doomed .

They have at least 400 nukes and a 1st world economy and military.

Why would they be doomed?

Their largest neighbor Egypt (who is about as militarily competent as Mexico) even has a peace treaty with them that they have honored since 1979

Not only that....but fertility rates are a major sign of if your nation has a future. And Israel has a fertility rate of 3.0 (while most of the Europe and N. America are below replacement).

Israel's population is growing...with ultra-orthodox growing very fast.

[Israel's population will surge by 70 percent, to almost 16 million, by 2050, with the ultra-Orthodox accounting for about a third of all Israeli Jews]

How are they doomed? Can you name a European country that is going to have 70% population growth over the next 30 years and a 3.0 fertility rate? Its all the countries in Europe that you should be worried about...not Israel.


Israel does not have anything approaching 400 nukes.

And what nukes they do have are unusable for all practical purposes due to their country's small size and vulnerability to nuclear retaliation.

Israel remains surrounded by Muslim populations who hate them irregardless what treaties their leadership signs.

Muslim populations in the region are expanding far more rapidly than Jewish populations.

And Israel's own people are racked by increasing division.


Israel probably has around 50 nukes. That is more than enough to make sure their enemies go down with them if the survival of the State or People is put in question.


More like at least 80 to a possible 400

[Israel is estimated to possess somewhere between 75 and 400 nuclear warheads. One possible motivation for nuclear ambiguity is deterrence with minimum political cost.]

They have had them since they developed them with South Africa

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0096340214555409
The French sold the Israelis the technology.


Probably.

But they tested them out with South Africa near Prince Edward Islands in the south Atlantic half way to Antarctica

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vela_incident
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most honest the Biden White House has ever been….


historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honesty is rare for this bunch
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good to know the Israeli ruling class is the same as ours…



KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Good to know the Israeli ruling class is the same as ours…




You certainly have the right to your anti Israeli bias.

However it would be refreshing it you would disclose the reasons for it.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Redbrickbear said:

Good to know the Israeli ruling class is the same as ours…




You certainly have the right to your anti Israeli bias.

However it would be refreshing it you would disclose the reasons for it.




Making fun of the PM letting his son run off to Miami to have fun while the soldiers enter Gaza to fight is bias.

Do you personably work for Bibi?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

Redbrickbear said:

Good to know the Israeli ruling class is the same as ours…




You certainly have the right to your anti Israeli bias.

However it would be refreshing it you would disclose the reasons for it.




Making fun of the PM letting his son run off to Miami to have fun while the soldiers enter Gaza to fight is bias.

Do you personably work for Bibi?
Is the PM going to send some IDF over to fetch his 32 year old son back?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
True. Also to the best of my knowledge no tribe in the territory of the United States had built the sort of permanent civilization here as the Aztecs, Mayans, or Toltecs did further south.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap said:

Obligatory "no evidence of a hate crime" in the stabbing of a Jewish Synagogue President outside her home.




Last I checked very little was known about this incident.

What is known:

- Dearborn and Hamatrack have a very large Muslim population for a US city.
- This was undoubtedly a reform synagogue. For those of you who read "synagogue" and automatically think "King David", in this case you need to realize that "reform" synagogues are to the Old Testament what Waco47 is to the New.
- She was politically connected to a network of state level democrat women.
- We know nothing of her personal life.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:


Its honestly not fair to throw Egypt and Jordan in with that group.

Egypt has had a peace treaty with Israel that they have honored since 1979.

And the royal family of Jordan (Hashemites) have gone out of their way to be on good relations with Israel since their peace treaty in 1994.

They have strong economic relations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93Jordan_relations


Unfortunately I don't think that we are going to have much luck convincing the multi color rapture chart crowd of anything with boots on the ground observations. But the experience of Jordan and Egypt do prove that detente is possible. How to fit Palestinians into this model is the challenge.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Redbrickbear said:


Its honestly not fair to throw Egypt and Jordan in with that group.

Egypt has had a peace treaty with Israel that they have honored since 1979.

And the royal family of Jordan (Hashemites) have gone out of their way to be on good relations with Israel since their peace treaty in 1994.

They have strong economic relations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93Jordan_relations


Unfortunately I don't think that we are going to have much luck convincing the multi color rapture chart crowd of anything with boots on the ground observations. But the experience of Jordan and Egypt do prove that detente is possible. How to fit Palestinians into this model is the challenge.


Palestinians don't have an end game that doesn't include the destruction of Israel is the problem. Egypt and Jordan have other desires, such as an economy. Palestinians whole identity is destroy Israel and kill Jews. Sort of hard to negotiate with that. They have had Gaza since 2005 and chose to buy missiles rather than develop a City-state.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some of the tribes in what is now the U.S. had relatively advanced cultures but at the time the British colonies were founded none, to my knowledge, were as advanced as the Maya or Inca. Later, after the U.S. was well established, the five civilized tribes of the southeast were more advanced. For example, the Cherokee had a written constitution modeled after our own.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Some of the tribes in what is now the U.S. had relatively advanced cultures but at the time the British colonies were founded none, to my knowledge, were as advanced as the Maya or Inca. Later, after the U.S. was well established, the five civilized tribes of the southeast were more advanced. For example, the Cherokee had a written constitution modeled after our own.
I think we modeled ours after theirs and the Iroquois.

I grew up in New York in the 60's and 70's. One of the great things about attending school there was the education system at the time. First, they had Regent's courses which were high academic courses and you had to pass a Regent's exam to get credit. Second, was the Social Science education. We learned a lot about the Iroquois. The Iroquois Confederation played a role in the development of the US Constitution as well. We learned a lot about the relationships. I think I got through HS and the first 2 years of college on what my Regent's classes!


The Native American Government That Helped Inspire the US Constitution | HISTORY
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Founding Fathers were influenced by European ideas when writing the constitution than Native American ones. The Iroquois League was a confederation so maybe it influenced the drafting of the Articles of Confederation. I do not know. But at the convention in Philadelphia the Founders rejected that model. They wanted a republic with a central government powerful enough to address the needs of the country.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

The Founding Fathers were influenced by European ideas when writing the constitution than Native American ones. The Iroquois League was a confederation so maybe it influenced the drafting of the Articles of Confederation. I do not know. But at the convention in Philadelphia the Founders rejected that model. They wanted a republic with a central government powerful enough to address the needs of the country.
But they had no working models in Europe, just ideas. In the Iroquois they had a working model to compare ideas to what happened in real life and it played a role in the development, so much so that they said so in a 1988 Resolution. But, let's be clear, the US Constitution was unique. There was no literal model to follow, only similar systems for comparisons.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

Redbrickbear said:

Good to know the Israeli ruling class is the same as ours…




You certainly have the right to your anti Israeli bias.

However it would be refreshing it you would disclose the reasons for it.




Making fun of the PM letting his son run off to Miami to have fun while the soldiers enter Gaza to fight is bias.

Do you personably work for Bibi?
Silly deflection.

You have made many posts critical of Israel from various different angles.

Maybe you are Muslim, maybe someone close to you is Muslim, maybe you just don't like Jews.

Its all perfectly fine of course. We all have our personal biases.

My late father in law was a full blooded German who never believed the Nazi death camps ever existed.

And his daughter chooses to believe Israel ALLOWED the slaughter of 1400 of its people in order to justify bombing the Gaza Strip.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Jack Bauer said:

40 years ago today


By far the biggest, most costly blunder of Reagan's presidency.

Sickening how the local military commanders would be so stupid as to stack our troops into such an easy target.

Then we ran out of the region with our tails between our legs.

The consequences of which are still being felt.
Can't say one of Reagan's brightest moments. The French and Israeli's at least bombed in retaliation...
We shelled Lebanon with the Battleship New Jersey. pancaked the home village of one of my Druze friends in Liberia at the time.

https://www.nytimes.com/1984/02/09/world/us-battleship-pounds-hills-held-by-syrians-in-lebanon-britain-pulling-out-troops.html
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:


Correct. It's not a cycle. It's a war to eradicate the Jewish people "from the river to the sea." Thank goodness Israel does not think that way and only attacks military targets to eliminate the threat, as opposed to Hamas, who lashes out indiscriminately to just kill as many Jews as it can, given its limited capabilities..
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They did not need a working model beyond the history of republics in general (which was not stellar). America was a great experiment: could they make a republic work in this vast land? They really did not have a clear idea of that success until the "Revolution of 1800": Thomas Jefferson defeated John Adams in the election (while his party swept both houses of Congress) for the first peaceful transfer of power in human history.

The Iroquois system was not very similar to the American constitution. The Founders rejected the idea of a confederation & chose a republic. The Iroquois wasn't exactly a great model of success either: they survived but did not manage crises very well. They were divided during the French & Indian War, for example.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Jack Bauer said:

40 years ago today


By far the biggest, most costly blunder of Reagan's presidency.

Sickening how the local military commanders would be so stupid as to stack our troops into such an easy target.

Then we ran out of the region with our tails between our legs.

The consequences of which are still being felt.
Can't say one of Reagan's brightest moments. The French and Israeli's at least bombed in retaliation...
We shelled Lebanon with the Battleship New Jersey. pancaked the home village of one of my Druze friends in Liberia at the time.

https://www.nytimes.com/1984/02/09/world/us-battleship-pounds-hills-held-by-syrians-in-lebanon-britain-pulling-out-troops.html

Ok, forgot that.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

They did not need a working model beyond the history of republics in general (which was not stellar). America was a great experiment: could they make a republic work in this vast land? They really did not have a clear idea of that success until the "Revolution of 1800": Thomas Jefferson defeated John Adams in the election (while his party swept both houses of Congress) for the first peaceful transfer of power in human history.

The Iroquois system was not very similar to the American constitution. The Founders rejected the idea of a confederation & chose a republic. The Iroquois wasn't exactly a great model of success either: they survived but did not manage crises very well. They were divided during the French & Indian War, for example.
Ok, everything taught about that and the Resolution 1988 was dead wrong. You are right. Better?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

They did not need a working model beyond the history of republics in general (which was not stellar). America was a great experiment: could they make a republic work in this vast land? They really did not have a clear idea of that success until the "Revolution of 1800": Thomas Jefferson defeated John Adams in the election (while his party swept both houses of Congress) for the first peaceful transfer of power in human history.

The Iroquois system was not very similar to the American constitution. The Founders rejected the idea of a confederation & chose a republic. The Iroquois wasn't exactly a great model of success either: they survived but did not manage crises very well. They were divided during the French & Indian War, for example.
100% correct


Well done sir.
FormerFlash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

historian said:

Some of the tribes in what is now the U.S. had relatively advanced cultures but at the time the British colonies were founded none, to my knowledge, were as advanced as the Maya or Inca. Later, after the U.S. was well established, the five civilized tribes of the southeast were more advanced. For example, the Cherokee had a written constitution modeled after our own.
I think we modeled ours after theirs and the Iroquois.

I grew up in New York in the 60's and 70's. One of the great things about attending school there was the education system at the time. First, they had Regent's courses which were high academic courses and you had to pass a Regent's exam to get credit. Second, was the Social Science education. We learned a lot about the Iroquois. The Iroquois Confederation played a role in the development of the US Constitution as well. We learned a lot about the relationships. I think I got through HS and the first 2 years of college on what my Regent's classes!


The Native American Government That Helped Inspire the US Constitution | HISTORY

I have a regent's diploma from a New York high school, meaning I passed all course affiliated state regents exams with a score of 85 or higher. I'm not sure how well recognized the validity of a regent's diploma is outside of the state, however, I will say undergrad in Ohio was somewhat of a breeze while my best friends in college, who went to high school in Iowa, struggled mightily.
Sic Everyone.
First Page Last Page
Page 38 of 198
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.