BearN said:
Redbrickbear said:
BearN said:
Redbrickbear said:
Realitybites said:
The whole Jewish presence in Israel for thousands of years has already been discussed previously. About 2000 years of a Jewish Kingdom there followed by about 2000 years of the Jewish presence there having been virtually extinguished and the region's name changed to Syria Palestina.
Without doubt there were jews in the western part of the Levant between modern Lebanon and Egypt well before the the rise of the Roman Republic/Empire.
But much of what we think we know about the history there might be myth and not real history.
["Following 70 years of intensive excavations in the Land of Israel, archaeologists have found out: The patriarchs' acts are legendary, the Israelites did not sojourn in Egypt or make an exodus, they did not conquer the land. Neither is there any mention of the empire of David and Solomon, nor of the source of belief in the God of Israel. These facts have been known for years, but Israel is a stubborn people and nobody wants to hear about it. This is what archaeologists have learned from their excavations in the Land of Israel: the Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel. Perhaps even harder to swallow is the fact that the united monarchy of David and Solomon, which is described by the Bible as a regional power, was at most a small tribal kingdom." By Ze'ev Herzog (Professor, Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures Department, Tel Aviv University)]
[In the Jewish Study Bible (2014), Oded Lip*****s states the concept of United Monarchy should be abandoned, while Aren Maeir believes there is insufficient evidence in support of the United Monarchy. In August 2015, Israeli archaeologists discovered massive fortifications in the ruins of the ancient city of Gath, supposed birthplace of Goliath. The size of the fortifications shows that Gath was a large city in the 10th century BCE, perhaps the largest in Canaan at the time. The professor leading the dig, Aren Maeir, estimated that Gath was as much as four times the size of contemporary Jerusalem, which cast doubt that David's kingdom could have been as powerful as described in the Bible]
Now tell us about the part where the holocaust never happened either.
If you want to imply that the Holocaust is as open a question as the Bronze Age history of the ancient Levant…that is certainly and interesting take.
If you had read the post you would notice it's all modern Israeli archaeology professors and academics doubting if there ever was a migration out of Egypt and casting doubt on the supposed regional power of the United monarchy (and if it existed at al).
One thing that can be said is that modern Israeli archaeologists are brave enough to question national mythos and question if they are in fact real.
Yes I read the garbage research you posted. Of course they doubt it. They are liberal atheists and see everything through that lens.
There is plenty of archaeological and historical evidence that supports the Biblical Narrative and nothing has been found that has disproved it.
What about these views are "garbage research"
And how do you know these specific Israeli archaeologists are liberal atheists?
Israel Finkelstein and others are obviously ethnic Ashkenazi Jews and Israeli but I don't see anything online about their specific political views or religious views.
I don't think they would intentionally set out to disprove a cornerstone ideological mythos of the Jewish people and their claim on the land.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Finkelstein[Finkelstein dealt with a variety of themes related to the archeology and history of the Northern Kingdom of Israel.
He proposed that the first North Israelite territorial polity emerged in the Gibeon-Bethel plateau in the late Iron I and early Iron IIA. He found archaeological evidence for this in the system of fortified sites, such as Tell en-Nasbeh, Khirbet ed-Dawwara, et-Tell ("Ai") and Gibeon. Historical evidence for the existence of this polity can be found in the campaign of Pharaoh Sheshonq I in this region ... According to Finkelstein, positive memories in the Bible of the House of Saul, which originated from the North, represent this early Israelite entity. He suggested that this north Israelite polity ruled over much of the territory of the highlands, that it presented a threat to the interests of Egypt of the 22nd Dynasty in Canaan, and that it was taken over during the campaign of Sheshonq I.
Finkelstein proposed that in its early days, the Northern Kingdom (Jeroboam I and his successors) ruled over the Samaria Highlands, the western slopes of the Gilead and the area of the Jezreel Valley...
Finkelstein also reflected on biblical traditions related to the Northern Kingdom, such as the Jacob cycle in Genesis (a study carried out with Thomas Römer),
the Exodus tradition, the heroic stories in the Book of Judges and remnants of royal traditions in the Books of Samuel and Kings. He suggested that these North Israelite traditions were first committed to writing in the days of Jeroboam II (first half of the 8th century BCE), that they were brought to Judah with Israelite refugees after the takeover of Israel by Assyria, and that they were later incorporated into the Judahite-dominated Bible.]