Netanyahu said "we are at war,"

528,812 Views | 6919 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by whiterock
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Today Jerusalem has close to a million people. I find it highly doubtful that any ancient city had 4 million. That's the size of Houston today. I'm no expert on ancient history, but the only ancient city I know of with a huge population was Rome and supposedly it was about a million by some estimates (I'm going off of memory now). I cannot imagine any civilization 2,000-3,000 years ago would have the infrastructure to feed that many people, provide clean water, etc. The Roman Empire had aqueducts & other engineering marvels for their time but that was later and even 1 million would be pushing the limits.
I agree. I have a problem when the Bible is quoted as a history book. Historical events happened, but the Bible uses many literary tools to get its message across. Do I believe that the walls of Jericho literally fell? I would say they were breached and that was a way of writing it up to show how unity can work. I do believe there was a battle of Jericho and the Israeli's won. How???
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

whiterock said:

The more immediate impact will be to drive enough center-left Democrats/Independents back across to Republicans to form a more traditional American coalition of the center.


Zero chance of that. The "center" has shrunk beyond recognition. Consider that despite two years of high inflation and a destabilizing world Karen still voted to trans the kids she can't abort. There is almost no chance a sizeable number of Democrat voters realign to support echatological fever dreams about Israel.
Read the statement from the MN congressman challenging Biden. 40k votes in a handful of states....quite evenly divided. Won't take a third of Democrats to cross over. And when a GOP president can use the bully pulpit to frame the issue clearly instead of obscure the problem, you will see a Reaganesque sized coalition form. It's already happening. Things can't be unseen.

Quote:

Hamas screwed the pooch.
They are the new KKK. Touch them and you movement dies.


They appear to have a good bit more support than the KKK.
That's true, but not the point.

Read the history of the 2nd Klan. One incident caused a decline from as many as 8m to 30k over a 7 year period. The 3rd Klan formed for a mission so odious that it today that the range of estimates about member ship are all 4-digit numbers...inconsequential.

That's where we are with the Hamas stuff. They left is so loud & proud about it, it's intimidating to an enormous number of people.

The left is showing us how voraciously intolerant it is. That's a loser.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Meanwhile, in the country with the second largest military in NATO...




Our dear friends the Turks….



FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

Meanwhile, in the country with the second largest military in NATO...




Our dear friends the Turks….




I am becoming more and more convinced this is an AI planned scenario by China and maybe even Russia.

Look at the pieces being moved and the fall out, the fall out is several layers below the expected areas. Turkey creating a NATO Article 5 crisis? This is 3d chess stuff...
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

Meanwhile, in the country with the second largest military in NATO...




Our dear friends the Turks….




I am becoming more and more convinced this is an AI planned scenario by China and maybe even Russia.

Look at the pieces being moved and the fall out, the fall out is several layers below the expected areas. Turkey creating a NATO Article 5 crisis? This is 3d chess stuff...
I don't like treaties for this reason. If Russia moves on a NATO member, i.e Montenegro, then the US is in WW3.

However, I think Art 5 is defensive, not offensive. Turkey doesn't get to be the aggressor and invoke Art 5 to bring the rest of NATO into their war of aggression.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

Meanwhile, in the country with the second largest military in NATO...




Our dear friends the Turks….




I am becoming more and more convinced this is an AI planned scenario by China and maybe even Russia.

Look at the pieces being moved and the fall out, the fall out is several layers below the expected areas. Turkey creating a NATO Article 5 crisis? This is 3d chess stuff...

I doubt any of these actors are that smart for 3d chess type scenarios.

I think more likely this is just what happens when you have chaotic situations, bad actors, and a coalition of allies that often distrust each other or even hate each other.

Turkey especially has been a bad friend. Needed for its vital location...but other wise a untrustworthy entity.

Be it helping engage in Armenian ethnic cleansing in Nagorno-Karabakh enclave with Azerbaijan, playing footsie with China with the Belt & Road initiative, letting millions of Syrian refugees pour into Europe, shooting rockets at the Kurds in Syria (nominal allies of the US), often times seeming to encourage Islamic fundamentalism, etc.


[If Erdogan's schmoozing of Putin, double-dealing over Ukraine, neo-Ottoman overreaching and on-off aggression towards fellow Nato member Greece are not sufficient proof of bad faith, then consider his other war on his country's democracy. Human rights abuses aside, Erdogan has made a huge mess of Turkey's economy. Inflation is at 58%, living standards are plummeting. More than 70% of 18 to 25-year-olds say they would prefer to live elsewhere.]

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/05/turkeys-two-faced-sultan-is-no-friend-of-the-west-its-time-to-play-hardball
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

FLBear5630 said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

Meanwhile, in the country with the second largest military in NATO...




Our dear friends the Turks….




I am becoming more and more convinced this is an AI planned scenario by China and maybe even Russia.

Look at the pieces being moved and the fall out, the fall out is several layers below the expected areas. Turkey creating a NATO Article 5 crisis? This is 3d chess stuff...

I doubt any of these actors are that smart for 3d chess type scenarios.

I think more likely this is just what happens when you have chaotic situations, bad actors, and a coalition of allies that often distrust each other or even hate each other.

Turkey especially has been a bad friend. Needed for its vital location...but other wise a untrustworthy entity.

Be it helping engage in Armenian ethnic cleansing in Nagorno-Karabakh enclave with Azerbaijan, playing footsie with China with the Belt & Road initiative, letting millions of Syrian refugees pour into Europe, shooting rockets at the Kurds in Syria (nominal allies of the US), often times seeming to encourage Islamic fundamentalism, etc.


[If Erdogan's schmoozing of Putin, double-dealing over Ukraine, neo-Ottoman overreaching and on-off aggression towards fellow Nato member Greece are not sufficient proof of bad faith, then consider his other war on his country's democracy. Human rights abuses aside, Erdogan has made a huge mess of Turkey's economy. Inflation is at 58%, living standards are plummeting. More than 70% of 18 to 25-year-olds say they would prefer to live elsewhere.]

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/05/turkeys-two-faced-sultan-is-no-friend-of-the-west-its-time-to-play-hardball
You are right, which is why it keeps leading me back to China and Xi. He is smart enough and has been working on AI at a fever pace. He is the one playing 3d chess, not the thugs, including Putin, that are acting it out.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
3-D chess is not necessary when Obama and Biden are running the show.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrecks Quan Dough said:

3-D chess is not necessary when Obama and Biden are running the show.
True.

But, that doesn't mean China wasn't ready to play it. You don't see anything coordinated with unintended/unthought about down the line results? It has an asymmetry about it that looks scheduled and planned, as opposed to opportunistic and organic.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

3-D chess is not necessary when Obama and Biden are running the show.
True.

But, that doesn't mean China wasn't ready to play it. You don't see anything coordinated with unintended/unthought about down the line results? It has an asymmetry about it that looks scheduled and planned, as opposed to opportunistic and organic.
They have planned to win a war against the West without firing a shot. This was before AI was a thing.

The national debt is a national security issue. Most people with a modicum of intelligence realized that 20 trillion dollars ago. That is something that has more to do with our own lack of self control than it does with China being brilliant.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrecks Quan Dough said:

FLBear5630 said:

Wrecks Quan Dough said:

3-D chess is not necessary when Obama and Biden are running the show.
True.

But, that doesn't mean China wasn't ready to play it. You don't see anything coordinated with unintended/unthought about down the line results? It has an asymmetry about it that looks scheduled and planned, as opposed to opportunistic and organic.
They have planned to win a war against the West without firing a shot. This was before AI was a thing.

The national debt is a national security issue. Most people with a modicum of intelligence realized that 20 trillion dollars ago. That is something that has more to do with our own lack of self control than it does with China being brilliant.
AI a thing? How long do you think they have been working on AI???? 1956. Worked with an engineer from Germany first job out of school was Mercedes working on automatic parallel parking, 1974. Look up AI and war gaming. Read a little and tell me you don't see the hallmarks of an AI plan.

How old are you? Serious question, you think this stuff is new? The tech finally got small and fast enough to do it. It has been in the works since Turing cracked Enigma

Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hamas at work

Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Turkey has always been the real flash point in this ongoing mess.

The real reason the US has put 2 carrier groups in the area.

Better warm up the carrier groups in Japan and get them out to sea asap.

As events are escalating rapidly.

No hyperbole: The US could be at war by the end of the week.




Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

BearN said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

The whole Jewish presence in Israel for thousands of years has already been discussed previously. About 2000 years of a Jewish Kingdom there followed by about 2000 years of the Jewish presence there having been virtually extinguished and the region's name changed to Syria Palestina.

Without doubt there were jews in the western part of the Levant between modern Lebanon and Egypt well before the the rise of the Roman Republic/Empire.

But much of what we think we know about the history there might be myth and not real history.

["Following 70 years of intensive excavations in the Land of Israel, archaeologists have found out: The patriarchs' acts are legendary, the Israelites did not sojourn in Egypt or make an exodus, they did not conquer the land. Neither is there any mention of the empire of David and Solomon, nor of the source of belief in the God of Israel. These facts have been known for years, but Israel is a stubborn people and nobody wants to hear about it. This is what archaeologists have learned from their excavations in the Land of Israel: the Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel. Perhaps even harder to swallow is the fact that the united monarchy of David and Solomon, which is described by the Bible as a regional power, was at most a small tribal kingdom." By Ze'ev Herzog (Professor, Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures Department, Tel Aviv University)]


[In the Jewish Study Bible (2014), Oded Lip*****s states the concept of United Monarchy should be abandoned, while Aren Maeir believes there is insufficient evidence in support of the United Monarchy. In August 2015, Israeli archaeologists discovered massive fortifications in the ruins of the ancient city of Gath, supposed birthplace of Goliath. The size of the fortifications shows that Gath was a large city in the 10th century BCE, perhaps the largest in Canaan at the time. The professor leading the dig, Aren Maeir, estimated that Gath was as much as four times the size of contemporary Jerusalem, which cast doubt that David's kingdom could have been as powerful as described in the Bible]


Now tell us about the part where the holocaust never happened either.



If you want to imply that the Holocaust is as open a question as the Bronze Age history of the ancient Levant…that is certainly and interesting take.

If you had read the post you would notice it's all modern Israeli archaeology professors and academics doubting if there ever was a migration out of Egypt and casting doubt on the supposed regional power of the United monarchy (and if it existed at al).

One thing that can be said is that modern Israeli archaeologists are brave enough to question national mythos and question if they are in fact real.


Yes I read the garbage research you posted. Of course they doubt it. They are liberal atheists and see everything through that lens.

There is plenty of archaeological and historical evidence that supports the Biblical Narrative and nothing has been found that has disproved it.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Turkey has always been the real flash point in this ongoing mess.

The real reason the US has put 2 carrier groups in the area.

Better warm up the carrier groups in Japan and get them out to sea asap.

As events are escalating rapidly.

No hyperbole: The US could be at war by the end of the week.





We better hope that it holds off until 2024! We do not have anyone in leadership I am comfortable handling such a mess. Biden and Harris make Bush and Cheney look like Marshall and Eisenhower...
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearN said:

Redbrickbear said:

BearN said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

The whole Jewish presence in Israel for thousands of years has already been discussed previously. About 2000 years of a Jewish Kingdom there followed by about 2000 years of the Jewish presence there having been virtually extinguished and the region's name changed to Syria Palestina.

Without doubt there were jews in the western part of the Levant between modern Lebanon and Egypt well before the the rise of the Roman Republic/Empire.

But much of what we think we know about the history there might be myth and not real history.

["Following 70 years of intensive excavations in the Land of Israel, archaeologists have found out: The patriarchs' acts are legendary, the Israelites did not sojourn in Egypt or make an exodus, they did not conquer the land. Neither is there any mention of the empire of David and Solomon, nor of the source of belief in the God of Israel. These facts have been known for years, but Israel is a stubborn people and nobody wants to hear about it. This is what archaeologists have learned from their excavations in the Land of Israel: the Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel. Perhaps even harder to swallow is the fact that the united monarchy of David and Solomon, which is described by the Bible as a regional power, was at most a small tribal kingdom." By Ze'ev Herzog (Professor, Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures Department, Tel Aviv University)]


[In the Jewish Study Bible (2014), Oded Lip*****s states the concept of United Monarchy should be abandoned, while Aren Maeir believes there is insufficient evidence in support of the United Monarchy. In August 2015, Israeli archaeologists discovered massive fortifications in the ruins of the ancient city of Gath, supposed birthplace of Goliath. The size of the fortifications shows that Gath was a large city in the 10th century BCE, perhaps the largest in Canaan at the time. The professor leading the dig, Aren Maeir, estimated that Gath was as much as four times the size of contemporary Jerusalem, which cast doubt that David's kingdom could have been as powerful as described in the Bible]


Now tell us about the part where the holocaust never happened either.



If you want to imply that the Holocaust is as open a question as the Bronze Age history of the ancient Levant…that is certainly and interesting take.

If you had read the post you would notice it's all modern Israeli archaeology professors and academics doubting if there ever was a migration out of Egypt and casting doubt on the supposed regional power of the United monarchy (and if it existed at al).

One thing that can be said is that modern Israeli archaeologists are brave enough to question national mythos and question if they are in fact real.


Yes I read the garbage research you posted. Of course they doubt it. They are liberal atheists and see everything through that lens.

There is plenty of archaeological and historical evidence that supports the Biblical Narrative and nothing has been found that has disproved it.

What about these views are "garbage research"

And how do you know these specific Israeli archaeologists are liberal atheists?

Israel Finkelstein and others are obviously ethnic Ashkenazi Jews and Israeli but I don't see anything online about their specific political views or religious views.

I don't think they would intentionally set out to disprove a cornerstone ideological mythos of the Jewish people and their claim on the land.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Finkelstein

[Finkelstein dealt with a variety of themes related to the archeology and history of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. He proposed that the first North Israelite territorial polity emerged in the Gibeon-Bethel plateau in the late Iron I and early Iron IIA. He found archaeological evidence for this in the system of fortified sites, such as Tell en-Nasbeh, Khirbet ed-Dawwara, et-Tell ("Ai") and Gibeon. Historical evidence for the existence of this polity can be found in the campaign of Pharaoh Sheshonq I in this region ... According to Finkelstein, positive memories in the Bible of the House of Saul, which originated from the North, represent this early Israelite entity. He suggested that this north Israelite polity ruled over much of the territory of the highlands, that it presented a threat to the interests of Egypt of the 22nd Dynasty in Canaan, and that it was taken over during the campaign of Sheshonq I.

Finkelstein proposed that in its early days, the Northern Kingdom (Jeroboam I and his successors) ruled over the Samaria Highlands, the western slopes of the Gilead and the area of the Jezreel Valley...

Finkelstein also reflected on biblical traditions related to the Northern Kingdom, such as the Jacob cycle in Genesis (a study carried out with Thomas Römer), the Exodus tradition, the heroic stories in the Book of Judges and remnants of royal traditions in the Books of Samuel and Kings. He suggested that these North Israelite traditions were first committed to writing in the days of Jeroboam II (first half of the 8th century BCE), that they were brought to Judah with Israelite refugees after the takeover of Israel by Assyria, and that they were later incorporated into the Judahite-dominated Bible.]
BearN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

BearN said:

Redbrickbear said:

BearN said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

The whole Jewish presence in Israel for thousands of years has already been discussed previously. About 2000 years of a Jewish Kingdom there followed by about 2000 years of the Jewish presence there having been virtually extinguished and the region's name changed to Syria Palestina.

Without doubt there were jews in the western part of the Levant between modern Lebanon and Egypt well before the the rise of the Roman Republic/Empire.

But much of what we think we know about the history there might be myth and not real history.

["Following 70 years of intensive excavations in the Land of Israel, archaeologists have found out: The patriarchs' acts are legendary, the Israelites did not sojourn in Egypt or make an exodus, they did not conquer the land. Neither is there any mention of the empire of David and Solomon, nor of the source of belief in the God of Israel. These facts have been known for years, but Israel is a stubborn people and nobody wants to hear about it. This is what archaeologists have learned from their excavations in the Land of Israel: the Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel. Perhaps even harder to swallow is the fact that the united monarchy of David and Solomon, which is described by the Bible as a regional power, was at most a small tribal kingdom." By Ze'ev Herzog (Professor, Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures Department, Tel Aviv University)]


[In the Jewish Study Bible (2014), Oded Lip*****s states the concept of United Monarchy should be abandoned, while Aren Maeir believes there is insufficient evidence in support of the United Monarchy. In August 2015, Israeli archaeologists discovered massive fortifications in the ruins of the ancient city of Gath, supposed birthplace of Goliath. The size of the fortifications shows that Gath was a large city in the 10th century BCE, perhaps the largest in Canaan at the time. The professor leading the dig, Aren Maeir, estimated that Gath was as much as four times the size of contemporary Jerusalem, which cast doubt that David's kingdom could have been as powerful as described in the Bible]


Now tell us about the part where the holocaust never happened either.



If you want to imply that the Holocaust is as open a question as the Bronze Age history of the ancient Levant…that is certainly and interesting take.

If you had read the post you would notice it's all modern Israeli archaeology professors and academics doubting if there ever was a migration out of Egypt and casting doubt on the supposed regional power of the United monarchy (and if it existed at al).

One thing that can be said is that modern Israeli archaeologists are brave enough to question national mythos and question if they are in fact real.


Yes I read the garbage research you posted. Of course they doubt it. They are liberal atheists and see everything through that lens.

There is plenty of archaeological and historical evidence that supports the Biblical Narrative and nothing has been found that has disproved it.

What about these views are "garbage research"

And how do you know these specific Israeli archaeologists are liberal atheists?

Israel Finkelstein and others are obviously ethnically Ashkenazi Jews and Israeli but I don't see anything online about their specific political views or religious views.

I don't think they would intentionally set out to disprove a cornerstone ideological mythos of the Jewish people and their claim on the land.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Finkelstein

[Finkelstein dealt with a variety of themes related to the archeology and history of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. He proposed that the first North Israelite territorial polity emerged in the Gibeon-Bethel plateau in the late Iron I and early Iron IIA. He found archaeological evidence for this in the system of fortified sites, such as Tell en-Nasbeh, Khirbet ed-Dawwara, et-Tell ("Ai") and Gibeon. Historical evidence for the existence of this polity can be found in the campaign of Pharaoh Sheshonq I in this region ... According to Finkelstein, positive memories in the Bible of the House of Saul, which originated from the North, represent this early Israelite entity. He suggested that this north Israelite polity ruled over much of the territory of the highlands, that it presented a threat to the interests of Egypt of the 22nd Dynasty in Canaan, and that it was taken over during the campaign of Sheshonq I.

Finkelstein proposed that in its early days, the Northern Kingdom (Jeroboam I and his successors) ruled over the Samaria Highlands, the western slopes of the Gilead and the area of the Jezreel Valley...

Finkelstein also reflected on biblical traditions related to the Northern Kingdom, such as the Jacob cycle in Genesis (a study carried out with Thomas Römer), the Exodus tradition, the heroic stories in the Book of Judges and remnants of royal traditions in the Books of Samuel and Kings. He suggested that these North Israelite traditions were first committed to writing in the days of Jeroboam II (first half of the 8th century BCE), that they were brought to Judah with Israelite refugees after the takeover of Israel by Assyria, and that they were later incorporated into the Judahite-dominated Bible.]


Fffs if you are going to claim that the very foundations of Judaism and Christianity are myth, can you at least please put this garbage in another thread so it will be easier to ignore? It's hard enough sifting through your **** posting anti-Israel / Pro Allah Murder Cult, and now you want to take it to a whole other level of whackjobery.


Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearN said:

Redbrickbear said:

BearN said:

Redbrickbear said:

BearN said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

The whole Jewish presence in Israel for thousands of years has already been discussed previously. About 2000 years of a Jewish Kingdom there followed by about 2000 years of the Jewish presence there having been virtually extinguished and the region's name changed to Syria Palestina.

Without doubt there were jews in the western part of the Levant between modern Lebanon and Egypt well before the the rise of the Roman Republic/Empire.

But much of what we think we know about the history there might be myth and not real history.

["Following 70 years of intensive excavations in the Land of Israel, archaeologists have found out: The patriarchs' acts are legendary, the Israelites did not sojourn in Egypt or make an exodus, they did not conquer the land. Neither is there any mention of the empire of David and Solomon, nor of the source of belief in the God of Israel. These facts have been known for years, but Israel is a stubborn people and nobody wants to hear about it. This is what archaeologists have learned from their excavations in the Land of Israel: the Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel. Perhaps even harder to swallow is the fact that the united monarchy of David and Solomon, which is described by the Bible as a regional power, was at most a small tribal kingdom." By Ze'ev Herzog (Professor, Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures Department, Tel Aviv University)]


[In the Jewish Study Bible (2014), Oded Lip*****s states the concept of United Monarchy should be abandoned, while Aren Maeir believes there is insufficient evidence in support of the United Monarchy. In August 2015, Israeli archaeologists discovered massive fortifications in the ruins of the ancient city of Gath, supposed birthplace of Goliath. The size of the fortifications shows that Gath was a large city in the 10th century BCE, perhaps the largest in Canaan at the time. The professor leading the dig, Aren Maeir, estimated that Gath was as much as four times the size of contemporary Jerusalem, which cast doubt that David's kingdom could have been as powerful as described in the Bible]


Now tell us about the part where the holocaust never happened either.



If you want to imply that the Holocaust is as open a question as the Bronze Age history of the ancient Levant…that is certainly and interesting take.

If you had read the post you would notice it's all modern Israeli archaeology professors and academics doubting if there ever was a migration out of Egypt and casting doubt on the supposed regional power of the United monarchy (and if it existed at al).

One thing that can be said is that modern Israeli archaeologists are brave enough to question national mythos and question if they are in fact real.


Yes I read the garbage research you posted. Of course they doubt it. They are liberal atheists and see everything through that lens.

There is plenty of archaeological and historical evidence that supports the Biblical Narrative and nothing has been found that has disproved it.

What about these views are "garbage research"

And how do you know these specific Israeli archaeologists are liberal atheists?

Israel Finkelstein and others are obviously ethnically Ashkenazi Jews and Israeli but I don't see anything online about their specific political views or religious views.

I don't think they would intentionally set out to disprove a cornerstone ideological mythos of the Jewish people and their claim on the land.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Finkelstein

[Finkelstein dealt with a variety of themes related to the archeology and history of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. He proposed that the first North Israelite territorial polity emerged in the Gibeon-Bethel plateau in the late Iron I and early Iron IIA. He found archaeological evidence for this in the system of fortified sites, such as Tell en-Nasbeh, Khirbet ed-Dawwara, et-Tell ("Ai") and Gibeon. Historical evidence for the existence of this polity can be found in the campaign of Pharaoh Sheshonq I in this region ... According to Finkelstein, positive memories in the Bible of the House of Saul, which originated from the North, represent this early Israelite entity. He suggested that this north Israelite polity ruled over much of the territory of the highlands, that it presented a threat to the interests of Egypt of the 22nd Dynasty in Canaan, and that it was taken over during the campaign of Sheshonq I.

Finkelstein proposed that in its early days, the Northern Kingdom (Jeroboam I and his successors) ruled over the Samaria Highlands, the western slopes of the Gilead and the area of the Jezreel Valley...

Finkelstein also reflected on biblical traditions related to the Northern Kingdom, such as the Jacob cycle in Genesis (a study carried out with Thomas Römer), the Exodus tradition, the heroic stories in the Book of Judges and remnants of royal traditions in the Books of Samuel and Kings. He suggested that these North Israelite traditions were first committed to writing in the days of Jeroboam II (first half of the 8th century BCE), that they were brought to Judah with Israelite refugees after the takeover of Israel by Assyria, and that they were later incorporated into the Judahite-dominated Bible.]


Fffs if you are going to claim that the very foundations of Judaism and Christianity are myth, can you at least please put this garbage in another thread so it will be easier to ignore? It's hard enough sifting through your **** posting anti-Israel / Pro Allah Murder Cult, and now you want to take it to a whole other level of whackjobery.




I can't tell if your a troll or just dumb....

The fact that modern Israeli archeology does not believe (or at least seriously questions) the national mythos of the Jewish people/modern Israel is certainly a question for a thread about a land dispute and ethnic war between modern Israelis and Palestinians....it has nothing to do with the religious truths of Christianity.

I myself am a Baylor grad and practicing Christian.

If you can not handle a discussion of that scope...then that is your problem.

I myself think an Exodus of the ancient Hebrews from Egypt almost certainly did take place...but they remained a small tribal group surrounded by other peoples for a long time into the Iron Age.

Their wars against other peoples in the area show they were never the only people in the Levant....nor or they the only people group there today.
BUGWBBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Hamas loving Palestinians are inbred psychopaths.


Any of them been marching all over Baylor? Asking for a friend.
BearN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

BearN said:

Redbrickbear said:

BearN said:

Redbrickbear said:

BearN said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

The whole Jewish presence in Israel for thousands of years has already been discussed previously. About 2000 years of a Jewish Kingdom there followed by about 2000 years of the Jewish presence there having been virtually extinguished and the region's name changed to Syria Palestina.

Without doubt there were jews in the western part of the Levant between modern Lebanon and Egypt well before the the rise of the Roman Republic/Empire.

But much of what we think we know about the history there might be myth and not real history.

["Following 70 years of intensive excavations in the Land of Israel, archaeologists have found out: The patriarchs' acts are legendary, the Israelites did not sojourn in Egypt or make an exodus, they did not conquer the land. Neither is there any mention of the empire of David and Solomon, nor of the source of belief in the God of Israel. These facts have been known for years, but Israel is a stubborn people and nobody wants to hear about it. This is what archaeologists have learned from their excavations in the Land of Israel: the Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel. Perhaps even harder to swallow is the fact that the united monarchy of David and Solomon, which is described by the Bible as a regional power, was at most a small tribal kingdom." By Ze'ev Herzog (Professor, Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures Department, Tel Aviv University)]


[In the Jewish Study Bible (2014), Oded Lip*****s states the concept of United Monarchy should be abandoned, while Aren Maeir believes there is insufficient evidence in support of the United Monarchy. In August 2015, Israeli archaeologists discovered massive fortifications in the ruins of the ancient city of Gath, supposed birthplace of Goliath. The size of the fortifications shows that Gath was a large city in the 10th century BCE, perhaps the largest in Canaan at the time. The professor leading the dig, Aren Maeir, estimated that Gath was as much as four times the size of contemporary Jerusalem, which cast doubt that David's kingdom could have been as powerful as described in the Bible]


Now tell us about the part where the holocaust never happened either.



If you want to imply that the Holocaust is as open a question as the Bronze Age history of the ancient Levant…that is certainly and interesting take.

If you had read the post you would notice it's all modern Israeli archaeology professors and academics doubting if there ever was a migration out of Egypt and casting doubt on the supposed regional power of the United monarchy (and if it existed at al).

One thing that can be said is that modern Israeli archaeologists are brave enough to question national mythos and question if they are in fact real.


Yes I read the garbage research you posted. Of course they doubt it. They are liberal atheists and see everything through that lens.

There is plenty of archaeological and historical evidence that supports the Biblical Narrative and nothing has been found that has disproved it.

What about these views are "garbage research"

And how do you know these specific Israeli archaeologists are liberal atheists?

Israel Finkelstein and others are obviously ethnically Ashkenazi Jews and Israeli but I don't see anything online about their specific political views or religious views.

I don't think they would intentionally set out to disprove a cornerstone ideological mythos of the Jewish people and their claim on the land.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Finkelstein

[Finkelstein dealt with a variety of themes related to the archeology and history of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. He proposed that the first North Israelite territorial polity emerged in the Gibeon-Bethel plateau in the late Iron I and early Iron IIA. He found archaeological evidence for this in the system of fortified sites, such as Tell en-Nasbeh, Khirbet ed-Dawwara, et-Tell ("Ai") and Gibeon. Historical evidence for the existence of this polity can be found in the campaign of Pharaoh Sheshonq I in this region ... According to Finkelstein, positive memories in the Bible of the House of Saul, which originated from the North, represent this early Israelite entity. He suggested that this north Israelite polity ruled over much of the territory of the highlands, that it presented a threat to the interests of Egypt of the 22nd Dynasty in Canaan, and that it was taken over during the campaign of Sheshonq I.

Finkelstein proposed that in its early days, the Northern Kingdom (Jeroboam I and his successors) ruled over the Samaria Highlands, the western slopes of the Gilead and the area of the Jezreel Valley...

Finkelstein also reflected on biblical traditions related to the Northern Kingdom, such as the Jacob cycle in Genesis (a study carried out with Thomas Römer), the Exodus tradition, the heroic stories in the Book of Judges and remnants of royal traditions in the Books of Samuel and Kings. He suggested that these North Israelite traditions were first committed to writing in the days of Jeroboam II (first half of the 8th century BCE), that they were brought to Judah with Israelite refugees after the takeover of Israel by Assyria, and that they were later incorporated into the Judahite-dominated Bible.]


Fffs if you are going to claim that the very foundations of Judaism and Christianity are myth, can you at least please put this garbage in another thread so it will be easier to ignore? It's hard enough sifting through your **** posting anti-Israel / Pro Allah Murder Cult, and now you want to take it to a whole other level of whackjobery.




I can't tell if your a troll or just dumb....

The fact that modern Israeli archeology does not believe (or at least seriously questions) the national mythos of the Jewish people/modern Israel is certainly a question for a thread about a land dispute and ethnic war between modern Israelis and Palestinians....it has nothing to do with the religious truths of Christianity.

I myself am a Baylor grad and practicing Christian.

If you can not handle a discussion of that scope...then that is your problem.

I myself think an Exodus of the ancient Hebrews from Egypt almost certainly did take place...but they remained a small tribal group surrounded by other peoples for a long time into the Iron Age.

Their wars against other peoples in the area show they were never the only people in the Levant....nor or they the only people group there today.


So there are some Israeli scholars that think their own history is a myth? sure, that's an interesting footnote, I'll give you that. But the ramblings of a subset of modern Israeli Scholars that don't believe in the Exodus or the Davidic and Solomonic Kingdoms have ZERO traction with the people calling the shots in Israel, or the overwhelming majority of Jews. And there is plenty of archaeological evidence that supports the biblical narrative.

The Muslims of course believe Israel has no right to the land. I think we got that hint already.
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jordan asks US to deploy Patriot Air Defense systems. Who is Jordan concerned with this morning?

https://www.defensenews.com/global/mideast-africa/2023/10/30/jordan-asks-us-to-deploy-patriot-air-defense-systems/
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

Turkey has always been the real flash point in this ongoing mess.

The real reason the US has put 2 carrier groups in the area.

Better warm up the carrier groups in Japan and get them out to sea asap.

As events are escalating rapidly.

No hyperbole: The US could be at war by the end of the week.





We better hope that it holds off until 2024! We do not have anyone in leadership I am comfortable handling such a mess. Biden and Harris make Bush and Cheney look like Marshall and Eisenhower...
There is zero chance events in the Middle East will stabilize until 2024.

In fact it is the glaring incompetence / weakness of Biden and Harris that has encouraged not only the war in Ukraine, but the attack on Israel..

The United States has never been is such obvious danger of WW3 as we are right now.


Unfortuantely our people ( in general ) are so hopelessly ignorant, so distracted by their personal miseries, they can't comprehend the danger or even be bothered with it.

Going to be an interesting 14 days.

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

historian said:

Today Jerusalem has close to a million people. I find it highly doubtful that any ancient city had 4 million. That's the size of Houston today. I'm no expert on ancient history, but the only ancient city I know of with a huge population was Rome and supposedly it was about a million by some estimates (I'm going off of memory now). I cannot imagine any civilization 2,000-3,000 years ago would have the infrastructure to feed that many people, provide clean water, etc. The Roman Empire had aqueducts & other engineering marvels for their time but that was later and even 1 million would be pushing the limits.
I agree. I have a problem when the Bible is quoted as a history book. Historical events happened, but the Bible uses many literary tools to get its message across. Do I believe that the walls of Jericho literally fell? I would say they were breached and that was a way of writing it up to show how unity can work. I do believe there was a battle of Jericho and the Israeli's won. How???

Why shouldn't the Bible be quoted as a historical source? That's exactly what it is, although not it's primary purpose. Same is true for the Koran, Hindu texts, etc.

According to archaeological digs at the site, the walls of Jericho did fall, the city was burned, and the conquerors took the city. The archaeological record is aligned with the biblical account in remarkable detail. The only real issue separating the two is the dates. It seems to me that experts often have trouble dating ancient events with much precision unless there is ample surviving documentation, a rarity 3,000 years ago.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

Meanwhile, in the country with the second largest military in NATO...




Our dear friends the Turks….





I do not think NATO members would be obligated to help Turkey in a war they declared & started, especially if they allied themselves with terrorists.

Hopefully Islamofascist Erdogan is just blowing smoke & won't actually follow through with his insane rhetoric. It's a very foolish & dangerous game he is playing.
BearN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

Meanwhile, in the country with the second largest military in NATO...




Our dear friends the Turks….





I do not think NATO members would be obligated to help Turkey in a war they declared & started, especially if they allied themselves with terrorists.

Hopefully Islamofascist Erdogan is just blowing smoke & won't actually follow through with his insane rhetoric. It's a very foolish & dangerous game he is playing.


If Turkey were to declare war on Israel, and Israel retaliates, those other countries may not be obligated to attack Israel , but they may just want to anyway.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

Meanwhile, in the country with the second largest military in NATO...




Our dear friends the Turks….





I do not think NATO members would be obligated to help Turkey in a war they declared & started, especially if they allied themselves with terrorists.

Hopefully Islamofascist Erdogan is just blowing smoke & won't actually follow through with his insane rhetoric. It's a very foolish & dangerous game he is playing.


Most of our NATO Allie's will find any excuse not to aid the US and / or Israel .
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearN said:

historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

Meanwhile, in the country with the second largest military in NATO...




Our dear friends the Turks….





I do not think NATO members would be obligated to help Turkey in a war they declared & started, especially if they allied themselves with terrorists.

Hopefully Islamofascist Erdogan is just blowing smoke & won't actually follow through with his insane rhetoric. It's a very foolish & dangerous game he is playing.


If Turkey were to declare war on Israel, and Israel retaliates, those other countries may not be obligated to attack Israel , but they may just want to anyway.
What NATO nation will want to attack Israel besides Turkey? NATO is not attacking Israel. Turkey has been in NATO for 70 years, you think they are going to now go to Russia, Iran and China??
BearN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

BearN said:

historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

Realitybites said:

Meanwhile, in the country with the second largest military in NATO...




Our dear friends the Turks….





I do not think NATO members would be obligated to help Turkey in a war they declared & started, especially if they allied themselves with terrorists.

Hopefully Islamofascist Erdogan is just blowing smoke & won't actually follow through with his insane rhetoric. It's a very foolish & dangerous game he is playing.


If Turkey were to declare war on Israel, and Israel retaliates, those other countries may not be obligated to attack Israel , but they may just want to anyway.
What NATO nation will want to attack Israel besides Turkey? NATO is not attacking Israel. Turkey has been in NATO for 70 years, you think they are going to now go to Russia, Iran and China??


The first part of your question - when I said "other countries" along with Turkey, I wasn't thinking exclusively NATO countries, so that was my bad. Probably none. But who knows what other NATO countries are thinking. The whole world is drunk on Anti-semitism right now.

Regarding your second question, could Turkey ditch NATO to join Russia, China, Iran, Syria, and the rest in fighting against Israel? Absolutely. WILL they? That remains to be seen. But Just listen to Erdogan. That sounds like a man ready to go to war with Israel. Then where does that leave us? Fight a NATO member or side with Israel? Or do nothing?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:


I do not think NATO members would be obligated to help Turkey in a war they declared & started, especially if they allied themselves with terrorists.

Hopefully Islamofascist Erdogan is just blowing smoke & won't actually follow through with his insane rhetoric. It's a very foolish & dangerous game he is playing.

They are too smart to do that. They will deploy peacekeepers to Gaza and when they come under fire from the IDF did they will invoke article 5.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

historian said:


I do not think NATO members would be obligated to help Turkey in a war they declared & started, especially if they allied themselves with terrorists.

Hopefully Islamofascist Erdogan is just blowing smoke & won't actually follow through with his insane rhetoric. It's a very foolish & dangerous game he is playing.

They are too smart to do that. They will deploy peacekeepers to Gaza and when they come under fire from the IDF did they will invoke article 5.


NATO as an alliance will not attack Israel under any circumstances.

Though I expect Turkey will.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe but that does not mean they are eager to go to war against Israel, a national literally fighting for its survival.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:




"Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them." George Orwell
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Redbrickbear said:




"Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them." George Orwell

This woman probably think Ron Desantis is a bigger villain than Hamas.
First Page Last Page
Page 42 of 198
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.