Netanyahu said "we are at war,"

524,457 Views | 6914 Replies | Last: 4 min ago by Married A Horn
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

If Mr. Trump is returned to office, people close to him have vowed to "come after" the news media, open criminal investigations into onetime aides who broke with the former president and purge the government of civil servants deemed disloyal. When critics said Mr. Trump's language about ridding Washington of "vermin" echoed that of Adolf Hitler, the former president's spokesman said the critics' "sad, miserable existence will be crushed" under a new Trump administration.


Nevertrumpers don't seem to realize that this is precisely why people like President Trump.


Aside from Vivek, can you picture any other GOP presidential candidate saying anything remotely like this?


Neocon Nikki? Even "let's move the USDA to Iowa" Ron (hint: metastatic cancer is worse).
sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212





That's an old interview. Trump has said all sorts of things (shocking) but his attorneys have said different. They walked it back.





He said it. Quit excusing it
I believe him
You must have a reading comprehension problem. I responded to a pro-Trump post by saying the "already classified" defense is BS and even his lawyers have not made that argument. You're now saying I was defending Trump? This is bizarro world. For the last time . . . the "already declassified" defense is BS, so much so that his lawyers have had every opportunity to state that argument in court but have not.

I don't know what else to tell you. Man, and people say I now have TDS . . . .


If Mr. Trump is returned to office, people close to him have vowed to "come after" the news media, open criminal investigations into onetime aides who broke with the former president and purge the government of civil servants deemed disloyal. When critics said Mr. Trump's language about ridding Washington of "vermin" echoed that of Adolf Hitler, the former president's spokesman said the critics' "sad, miserable existence will be crushed" under a new Trump administration.
Sorry, I can't keep track as you change from subject to subject.

You respond to my post on Trump's stupid legal defense by agreeing with another one of my posts where I say BOTH SIDES should stop criminalizing the political process.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified. It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.


no, I worked CIA. I actually originated thousands of classified documents, at least a dozen a day for a decade.....under authority delegated to me by POTUS. You got drilled in procedure. I got drilled in executive power.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.


no, I worked CIA. I actually originated thousands of classified documents, at least a dozen a day for a decade.....under authority delegated to me by POTUS. You got drilled in procedure. I got drilled in executive power.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
And where yours falls down is that there is no proof of anything, even years later in a resort in FL. He can say whatever he wants and under your scenario that is good. He thought it "declassified" one night at dinner. Did he tell anyone, it doesn't matter. Did people act under a different level of security levels? Who knows. Did people get prosecuted for sharing information that Trump thought declassified but no one knew?

I think the Prosecutors will have a lot of questions about your view, expecially Congress and the Judiciary which are equal branches of Government.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege. The relocation of those documents to his garage most definitely did break law the moment the move occurred. Biden's only defense is for Obama to chime in and say "I told him he could take them." BIden could only have cover for what he did with them (or others) after his own inauguration.

There is no legal requirement that a POTUS do anything, file any memo, etc.... to declassify a document. Show me where He/She is so encumbered. They are not. Because THEY ARE THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY on such questions. And Trump most certainly was POTUS when those boxes at MAL left the WH.

But that's all tempest in a teapot, minutia about procedure, compared to the idea that a POTUS could be charged with ESPIONAGE for having moved, while POTUS, a document to his residence and then dared to make legal arguments that such was within his power.

This SCOTUS is not likely to encumber the office of President with the kind of restrictions on original authority the Trump prosecution seeks. It is going to let the political process handle such things......let the voters decide.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege. The relocation of those documents to his garage most definitely did break law the moment the move occurred. Biden's only defense is for Obama to chime in and say "I told him he could take them." BIden could only have cover for what he did with them (or others) after his own inauguration.

There is no legal requirement that a POTUS do anything, file any memo, etc.... to declassify a document. Show me where He/She is so encumbered. They are not. Because THEY ARE THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY on such questions. And Trump most certainly was POTUS when those boxes at MAL left the WH.

But that's all tempest in a teapot, minutia about procedure, compared to the idea that a POTUS could be charged with ESPIONAGE for having moved, while POTUS, a document to his residence and then dared to make legal arguments that such was within his power.

This SCOTUS is not likely to encumber the office of President with the kind of restrictions on original authority the Trump prosecution seeks. It is going to let the political process handle such things......let the voters decide.
There has to be some record of the action, Executive Order, Atomic Energy Act, etc... I am not debating that he has the power to declassify as POTUS. The question is DID HE???? According to what you are saying he can say 3 years later with no paper trail, no Executive Order, no Control Documentation and it is good enough.

Using this logic, a President can give China or Russia any of our National Security documentation and just say it isn't classified. There is no accountability, no proof, no checks and balances, it does not matter because it is not sercure/classified documents if POTUS says I declassified it when I gave it to Xi...
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege. The relocation of those documents to his garage most definitely did break law the moment the move occurred. Biden's only defense is for Obama to chime in and say "I told him he could take them." BIden could only have cover for what he did with them (or others) after his own inauguration.

There is no legal requirement that a POTUS do anything, file any memo, etc.... to declassify a document. Show me where He/She is so encumbered. They are not. Because THEY ARE THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY on such questions. And Trump most certainly was POTUS when those boxes at MAL left the WH.

But that's all tempest in a teapot, minutia about procedure, compared to the idea that a POTUS could be charged with ESPIONAGE for having moved, while POTUS, a document to his residence and then dared to make legal arguments that such was within his power.

This SCOTUS is not likely to encumber the office of President with the kind of restrictions on original authority the Trump prosecution seeks. It is going to let the political process handle such things......let the voters decide.
There has to be some record of the action, Executive Order, Atomic Energy Act, etc... I am not debating that he has the power to declassify as POTUS. The question is DID HE???? According to what you are saying he can say 3 years later with no paper trail, no Executive Order, no Control Documentation and it is good enough.

Using this logic, a President can give China or Russia any of our National Security documentation and just say it isn't classified. There is no accountability, no proof, no checks and balances, it does not matter because it is not sercure/classified documents if POTUS says I declassified it when I gave it to Xi...
Who says that a POTUS must take an act to perfect a declassification? Show me where Originating Authority (OA) is thusly encumbered. Documentation may well be evidence to support a claim of declassification, but they are not relevant on the question of the power of declassification itself. So if OA had the power to declass, how can one argue that a failure to perfect it with documentation is evidence of espionage.

Indeed, a POTUS could decide on spur of the moment to lay a document showing satellite imagery on the table in front of Putin or Xi and use it to persuade them to a course of action. Such would by definition be a declassification. And he need not do a damned thing more. It is within his authority to dispose thusly. Just like it is within his power to take that same document home to ask Melania what she thinks about it. And there is accountability = to the American people at the ballot box. If he really is profoundly irresponsible in the way he disposes of his OA with classified information, the voters can toss him out. But to suggest that OA must cite one or more elements of powers delegated by OA? Why that's incestuous to the point of onanism. "I, by the powers vested in me by me, do solemnly swear to abide by my own orders, unless I change those orders....." Can you not see the mummy-wrap of circularity in that? Is it not absurd to require OA to issue orders to itself prior to taking an action?

No one else in the USG has such powers. But the Originating Authority does. Yet, you keep trying to treat the OA like an PFC, who like the entire chain of commend up to POTUS must constantly show care to remain within the authorities delegated to them. Normally, arguments about the limits of Presidential powers would be civil litigation. But the exigencies of politics make it useful for Democrats to treat it as criminal. So here we are - charging a former POTUS with espionage for taking actions likely well within his powers. Not because POTUS has done anything remarkable, but because such is necessary to protect institutional powers of the current regime.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege. The relocation of those documents to his garage most definitely did break law the moment the move occurred. Biden's only defense is for Obama to chime in and say "I told him he could take them." BIden could only have cover for what he did with them (or others) after his own inauguration.

There is no legal requirement that a POTUS do anything, file any memo, etc.... to declassify a document. Show me where He/She is so encumbered. They are not. Because THEY ARE THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY on such questions. And Trump most certainly was POTUS when those boxes at MAL left the WH.

But that's all tempest in a teapot, minutia about procedure, compared to the idea that a POTUS could be charged with ESPIONAGE for having moved, while POTUS, a document to his residence and then dared to make legal arguments that such was within his power.

This SCOTUS is not likely to encumber the office of President with the kind of restrictions on original authority the Trump prosecution seeks. It is going to let the political process handle such things......let the voters decide.
There has to be some record of the action, Executive Order, Atomic Energy Act, etc... I am not debating that he has the power to declassify as POTUS. The question is DID HE???? According to what you are saying he can say 3 years later with no paper trail, no Executive Order, no Control Documentation and it is good enough.

Using this logic, a President can give China or Russia any of our National Security documentation and just say it isn't classified. There is no accountability, no proof, no checks and balances, it does not matter because it is not sercure/classified documents if POTUS says I declassified it when I gave it to Xi...
Who says that a POTUS must take an act to perfect a declassification? Show me where Originating Authority (OA) is thusly encumbered. Documentation may well be evidence to support a claim of declassification, but they are not relevant on the question of the power of declassification itself. So if OA had the power to declass, how can one argue that a failure to perfect it with documentation is evidence of espionage.

Indeed, a POTUS could decide on spur of the moment to lay a document showing satellite imagery on the table in front of Putin or Xi and use it to persuade them to a course of action. Such would by definition be a declassification. And he need not do a damned thing more. It is within his authority to dispose thusly. Just like it is within his power to take that same document home to ask Melania what she thinks about it. And there is accountability = to the American people at the ballot box. If he really is profoundly irresponsible in the way he disposes of his OA with classified information, the voters can toss him out. But to suggest that OA must cite one or more elements of powers delegated by OA? Why that's incestuous to the point of onanism. "I, by the powers vested in me by me, do solemnly swear to abide by my own orders, unless I change those orders....." Can you not see the mummy-wrap of circularity in that? Is it not absurd to require OA to issue orders to itself prior to taking an action?

No one else in the USG has such powers. But the Originating Authority does. Yet, you keep trying to treat the OA like an PFC, who like the entire chain of commend up to POTUS must constantly show care to remain within the authorities delegated to them. Normally, arguments about the limits of Presidential powers would be civil litigation. But the exigencies of politics make it useful for Democrats to treat it as criminal. So here we are - charging a former POTUS with espionage for taking actions likely well within his powers. Not because POTUS has done anything remarkable, but because such is necessary to protect institutional powers of the current regime.
So, basically anything that Trump said he did is good. There is no way that he can possibly be in the wrong, no matter what he had or who originated it. I can see anything HE originated, but anything Originated prior that he has, I will be curious to see if the Judicial Branch agrees.

Going to be interesting. Now, if the Judicial Branch disagrees if you will honor the ruling? Or are we going all conspiracy theory and the Deep State crap...
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege. The relocation of those documents to his garage most definitely did break law the moment the move occurred. Biden's only defense is for Obama to chime in and say "I told him he could take them." BIden could only have cover for what he did with them (or others) after his own inauguration.

There is no legal requirement that a POTUS do anything, file any memo, etc.... to declassify a document. Show me where He/She is so encumbered. They are not. Because THEY ARE THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY on such questions. And Trump most certainly was POTUS when those boxes at MAL left the WH.

But that's all tempest in a teapot, minutia about procedure, compared to the idea that a POTUS could be charged with ESPIONAGE for having moved, while POTUS, a document to his residence and then dared to make legal arguments that such was within his power.

This SCOTUS is not likely to encumber the office of President with the kind of restrictions on original authority the Trump prosecution seeks. It is going to let the political process handle such things......let the voters decide.
There has to be some record of the action, Executive Order, Atomic Energy Act, etc... I am not debating that he has the power to declassify as POTUS. The question is DID HE???? According to what you are saying he can say 3 years later with no paper trail, no Executive Order, no Control Documentation and it is good enough.

Using this logic, a President can give China or Russia any of our National Security documentation and just say it isn't classified. There is no accountability, no proof, no checks and balances, it does not matter because it is not sercure/classified documents if POTUS says I declassified it when I gave it to Xi...
Who says that a POTUS must take an act to perfect a declassification? Show me where Originating Authority (OA) is thusly encumbered. Documentation may well be evidence to support a claim of declassification, but they are not relevant on the question of the power of declassification itself. So if OA had the power to declass, how can one argue that a failure to perfect it with documentation is evidence of espionage.

Indeed, a POTUS could decide on spur of the moment to lay a document showing satellite imagery on the table in front of Putin or Xi and use it to persuade them to a course of action. Such would by definition be a declassification. And he need not do a damned thing more. It is within his authority to dispose thusly. Just like it is within his power to take that same document home to ask Melania what she thinks about it. And there is accountability = to the American people at the ballot box. If he really is profoundly irresponsible in the way he disposes of his OA with classified information, the voters can toss him out. But to suggest that OA must cite one or more elements of powers delegated by OA? Why that's incestuous to the point of onanism. "I, by the powers vested in me by me, do solemnly swear to abide by my own orders, unless I change those orders....." Can you not see the mummy-wrap of circularity in that? Is it not absurd to require OA to issue orders to itself prior to taking an action?

No one else in the USG has such powers. But the Originating Authority does. Yet, you keep trying to treat the OA like an PFC, who like the entire chain of commend up to POTUS must constantly show care to remain within the authorities delegated to them. Normally, arguments about the limits of Presidential powers would be civil litigation. But the exigencies of politics make it useful for Democrats to treat it as criminal. So here we are - charging a former POTUS with espionage for taking actions likely well within his powers. Not because POTUS has done anything remarkable, but because such is necessary to protect institutional powers of the current regime.
I don't think a single court in this country will agree with you on this. And that's why Trump's lawyers have not made this argument despite judges all but begging them to.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege. The relocation of those documents to his garage most definitely did break law the moment the move occurred. Biden's only defense is for Obama to chime in and say "I told him he could take them." BIden could only have cover for what he did with them (or others) after his own inauguration.

There is no legal requirement that a POTUS do anything, file any memo, etc.... to declassify a document. Show me where He/She is so encumbered. They are not. Because THEY ARE THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY on such questions. And Trump most certainly was POTUS when those boxes at MAL left the WH.

But that's all tempest in a teapot, minutia about procedure, compared to the idea that a POTUS could be charged with ESPIONAGE for having moved, while POTUS, a document to his residence and then dared to make legal arguments that such was within his power.

This SCOTUS is not likely to encumber the office of President with the kind of restrictions on original authority the Trump prosecution seeks. It is going to let the political process handle such things......let the voters decide.
There has to be some record of the action, Executive Order, Atomic Energy Act, etc... I am not debating that he has the power to declassify as POTUS. The question is DID HE???? According to what you are saying he can say 3 years later with no paper trail, no Executive Order, no Control Documentation and it is good enough.

Using this logic, a President can give China or Russia any of our National Security documentation and just say it isn't classified. There is no accountability, no proof, no checks and balances, it does not matter because it is not sercure/classified documents if POTUS says I declassified it when I gave it to Xi...
Who says that a POTUS must take an act to perfect a declassification? Show me where Originating Authority (OA) is thusly encumbered. Documentation may well be evidence to support a claim of declassification, but they are not relevant on the question of the power of declassification itself. So if OA had the power to declass, how can one argue that a failure to perfect it with documentation is evidence of espionage.

Indeed, a POTUS could decide on spur of the moment to lay a document showing satellite imagery on the table in front of Putin or Xi and use it to persuade them to a course of action. Such would by definition be a declassification. And he need not do a damned thing more. It is within his authority to dispose thusly. Just like it is within his power to take that same document home to ask Melania what she thinks about it. And there is accountability = to the American people at the ballot box. If he really is profoundly irresponsible in the way he disposes of his OA with classified information, the voters can toss him out. But to suggest that OA must cite one or more elements of powers delegated by OA? Why that's incestuous to the point of onanism. "I, by the powers vested in me by me, do solemnly swear to abide by my own orders, unless I change those orders....." Can you not see the mummy-wrap of circularity in that? Is it not absurd to require OA to issue orders to itself prior to taking an action?

No one else in the USG has such powers. But the Originating Authority does. Yet, you keep trying to treat the OA like an PFC, who like the entire chain of commend up to POTUS must constantly show care to remain within the authorities delegated to them. Normally, arguments about the limits of Presidential powers would be civil litigation. But the exigencies of politics make it useful for Democrats to treat it as criminal. So here we are - charging a former POTUS with espionage for taking actions likely well within his powers. Not because POTUS has done anything remarkable, but because such is necessary to protect institutional powers of the current regime.
I don't think a single court in this country will agree with you on this. And that's why Trump's lawyers have not made this argument despite judges all but begging them to.
I have stated several times that one of the reasons that I am against Trump being the Nominee is because he brings this on himself. People ask how? He is sloppy, that is how.

If what Whiterock says is correct, this is all avoided by simply having proper document control. It may turn out after 2 years, millions of dollars and several law suits that he is found innocent, like the Ukraine call. But this is not necessary, just have your Staff do what it should do.

I fear if Trump wins it will be 4 more years of this crap. Like the Ukraine call, he was acquitted but it was time and political capital for something that didn't have to happen if Trump were not such an impulsive, polarizing person.

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The reality of all these bogus prosecutions of Trump us that they are designed to hinder his campaign. It distracts him & provides the propaganda ministry (media) negative fodder. The gag orders make it easier. It's all pretty blatant tampering if not outright rigging. It's also quite obvious except those who drank the Kool-aid or have extreme TDS.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
more to the point of the thread:

structural anti-semitism of islam

whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:



Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
Nope. Biden was not POTUS when he committed the security violation.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Osodecentx said:

sombear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

historian said:

As I understand the situation, as president Trump had the authority to declassify documents.
You misunderstand. I suggest more research. A president cannot declassify by merely thinking the act in retrospect.

I never said the president declassified a document by merely thinking it. That's stupid & ludicrous. I don't know what the actual procedure is but no doubt if he wanted those documents declassified he could have done that before leaving office. That's what he did.
His attorney have publicly stated that he is not even making that argument.
Wrong.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it
The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified. Evidence, he added, isn't really needed.
Donald Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
Former President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he had declassified the documents he took with him to his Mar-a-Lago estate that have since become the subject of an extensive Justice Department investigation.
Speaking on Fox News' "Hannity," Trump declined to point to specific evidence of that declassification. But, in a pre-recorded interview, he told host Sean Hannity that evidence was not needed.
"There doesn't have to be a process, as I understand it," Trump said. "You're the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it's declassified, even by thinking about it."

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.

"In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified," Trump said.
The comments came during a discussion of the ongoing criminal investigation of the highly sensitive documents seized by federal agents from Trump's home and resort in Florida. And they were offered as the ex-president's own legal team has resisted efforts to back up the assertion that the documents in question were declassified.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/trump-i-could-declassify-documents-by-thinking-about-it-00058212




Now it is "as I understand it..."
Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege. The relocation of those documents to his garage most definitely did break law the moment the move occurred. Biden's only defense is for Obama to chime in and say "I told him he could take them." BIden could only have cover for what he did with them (or others) after his own inauguration.

There is no legal requirement that a POTUS do anything, file any memo, etc.... to declassify a document. Show me where He/She is so encumbered. They are not. Because THEY ARE THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY on such questions. And Trump most certainly was POTUS when those boxes at MAL left the WH.

But that's all tempest in a teapot, minutia about procedure, compared to the idea that a POTUS could be charged with ESPIONAGE for having moved, while POTUS, a document to his residence and then dared to make legal arguments that such was within his power.

This SCOTUS is not likely to encumber the office of President with the kind of restrictions on original authority the Trump prosecution seeks. It is going to let the political process handle such things......let the voters decide.
There has to be some record of the action, Executive Order, Atomic Energy Act, etc... I am not debating that he has the power to declassify as POTUS. The question is DID HE???? According to what you are saying he can say 3 years later with no paper trail, no Executive Order, no Control Documentation and it is good enough.

Using this logic, a President can give China or Russia any of our National Security documentation and just say it isn't classified. There is no accountability, no proof, no checks and balances, it does not matter because it is not sercure/classified documents if POTUS says I declassified it when I gave it to Xi...
Who says that a POTUS must take an act to perfect a declassification? Show me where Originating Authority (OA) is thusly encumbered. Documentation may well be evidence to support a claim of declassification, but they are not relevant on the question of the power of declassification itself. So if OA had the power to declass, how can one argue that a failure to perfect it with documentation is evidence of espionage.

Indeed, a POTUS could decide on spur of the moment to lay a document showing satellite imagery on the table in front of Putin or Xi and use it to persuade them to a course of action. Such would by definition be a declassification. And he need not do a damned thing more. It is within his authority to dispose thusly. Just like it is within his power to take that same document home to ask Melania what she thinks about it. And there is accountability = to the American people at the ballot box. If he really is profoundly irresponsible in the way he disposes of his OA with classified information, the voters can toss him out. But to suggest that OA must cite one or more elements of powers delegated by OA? Why that's incestuous to the point of onanism. "I, by the powers vested in me by me, do solemnly swear to abide by my own orders, unless I change those orders....." Can you not see the mummy-wrap of circularity in that? Is it not absurd to require OA to issue orders to itself prior to taking an action?

No one else in the USG has such powers. But the Originating Authority does. Yet, you keep trying to treat the OA like an PFC, who like the entire chain of commend up to POTUS must constantly show care to remain within the authorities delegated to them. Normally, arguments about the limits of Presidential powers would be civil litigation. But the exigencies of politics make it useful for Democrats to treat it as criminal. So here we are - charging a former POTUS with espionage for taking actions likely well within his powers. Not because POTUS has done anything remarkable, but because such is necessary to protect institutional powers of the current regime.
I don't think a single court in this country will agree with you on this. And that's why Trump's lawyers have not made this argument despite judges all but begging them to.
ever argued over standing knowing you had a better argument in waiting?

A conservative SCOTUS will likely rule as I explained, unless they find another justification to rule in his favor, so as not to expand or limit the current powers of the office.

But none of that is the most extraordinary part. The choice to prosecute as an Espionage Act violation rather than civil litigation over the nature and limits of Presidential Power is truly outrageous. Democrats know that courts will lean toward the argument I made if it's just about Presidential powers. So they went the criminal route, for greater political effect.

Zero chance a conviction on the Espionage Act survives appeal, for to allow it to stand guarantees every POTUS will face such challenges from political opponents. It will become just part of the political process. No way this court and this Chief Justice will let themselves get sucked into that.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:



Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
Nope. Biden was not POTUS when he committed the security violation.


I'm arguing that it takes more than mere thought, actually a claim with nothing more, to declassify retroactively. So I think Biden's are a violation

You're claiming that classified records kept at Mar. Lago can't be a violation because of a previously undisclosed "thought ".

The records Biden had in the garage from the Obama era could have been declassified by mere thought when Biden became POTUS , a ludicrous claim but that is your defense of Trump

It takes more than mere thought & nothing else.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:



Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
Nope. Biden was not POTUS when he committed the security violation.


I'm arguing that it takes more than mere thought, actually a claim with nothing more, to declassify retroactively. So I think Biden's are a violation
Yes, but you're making the wrong argument. It's not the thought. It's the timeline. Biden was VPOTUS or Senator when the classified documents in question were carried to his personal home/office. He had no authority to declassify anything at that time, for any reason, by any act/thought. The only argument he has for escaping the espionage act is that he, by virtue of getting elected, gained an ability to ex post facto declassify them. Yes, he could argue that he "thought" them into declassified status AFTER BEING ELECTED, but does not that defense clearly support Trumps claims about "thought"?

You're claiming that classified records kept at Mar. Lago can't be a violation because of a previously undisclosed "thought."
Of course! No one would ever propose that a POTUS could be charged with carrying classified records to his residence, to his personal residence, in his personal car, on a hunting trip in Texas, on a shopping trip with Melania (because any such act would be presumed to be covered by originating authority). Same for showing a classified record to anyone, a foreign dignitary, a businessman of any nationality, a member of the press.....to accomplish whatever policy aime he saw fit. Trump, as POTUS, had the discretion to dispose of the records as he determined beneficial. NONE of that is contentious. Always assumed to have been so. And a federal court has recently ruled that such power extend to deeming presidential materials to be personal records to be taken with after leaving office for retention as personal files. (Clinton sock drawer) So it's hardly outlandish for Trump to argue that his decision (as POTUS) to decide that these documents were to be private records for retention at MAL after leaving office is within the realm of Presidential powers. Certainly it is not a criminal issue prosecutable under the Espionage Act. DOJ is wrong on the law here, but what's really outrageous is the choice to prosecute rather than litigate. DOJ could have asked a court to rule whether the sock drawer ruling applied to classified materials. If the court ruled against Trump, it could have issued the order for FBI to go get them. Problem solved.

But the documents were not the problem. TRUMP was the problem. He had to be destroyed. So they tossed the idea that the dispute was an issue about the limits of presidential powers, and decided to prosecute him for espionage. That is an outrageous politicization of prosecution, which would stand as a horrible precedent for every future POTUS to use against his political opponents.


The records Biden had in the garage from the Obama era could have been declassified by mere thought when Biden became POTUS , a ludicrous claim but that is your defense of Trump

It takes more than mere thought & nothing else.
No. Show me where the law encumbers a POTUS with any requirement for prior or subsequent action to achieve or effect declassification. There is none. Because the person who writes the orders for how all such things are to occur is the President of the United States. Any deviation he/she might make from policies they previously issued are presumed to be new policies. A POTUS cannot commit a security violation. IF the public does not like the way he/she handles classified records, they can vote him/her out of office.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
and now, of course, Blackjack Smith is asking SCOTUS to comment on the question I noted above about presidential powers. z

SCOTUS is probably going to tell him to pound sand in the appellate courts like everyone else. Zero chance they circumscribe so the powers of the Presidency as the neverTrumpers so desperately need to get their man.

neverTrumpers are a far greater threat to the Constitution than Trump. They'll do ANYTHING to get their man.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:



Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
Nope. Biden was not POTUS when he committed the security violation.


I'm arguing that it takes more than mere thought, actually a claim with nothing more, to declassify retroactively. So I think Biden's are a violation
Yes, but you're making the wrong argument. It's not the thought. It's the timeline. Biden was VPOTUS or Senator when the classified documents in question were carried to his personal home/office. He had no authority to declassify anything at that time, for any reason, by any act/thought. The only argument he has for escaping the espionage act is that he, by virtue of getting elected, gained an ability to ex post facto declassify them. Yes, he could argue that he "thought" them into declassified status AFTER BEING ELECTED, but does not that defense clearly support Trumps claims about "thought"?

You're claiming that classified records kept at Mar. Lago can't be a violation because of a previously undisclosed "thought."
Of course! No one would ever propose that a POTUS could be charged with carrying classified records to his residence, to his personal residence, in his personal car, on a hunting trip in Texas, on a shopping trip with Melania (because any such act would be presumed to be covered by originating authority). Same for showing a classified record to anyone, a foreign dignitary, a businessman of any nationality, a member of the press.....to accomplish whatever policy aime he saw fit. Trump, as POTUS, had the discretion to dispose of the records as he determined beneficial. NONE of that is contentious. Always assumed to have been so. And a federal court has recently ruled that such power extend to deeming presidential materials to be personal records to be taken with after leaving office for retention as personal files. (Clinton sock drawer) So it's hardly outlandish for Trump to argue that his decision (as POTUS) to decide that these documents were to be private records for retention at MAL after leaving office is within the realm of Presidential powers. Certainly it is not a criminal issue prosecutable under the Espionage Act. DOJ is wrong on the law here, but what's really outrageous is the choice to prosecute rather than litigate. DOJ could have asked a court to rule whether the sock drawer ruling applied to classified materials. If the court ruled against Trump, it could have issued the order for FBI to go get them. Problem solved.

But the documents were not the problem. TRUMP was the problem. He had to be destroyed. So they tossed the idea that the dispute was an issue about the limits of presidential powers, and decided to prosecute him for espionage. That is an outrageous politicization of prosecution, which would stand as a horrible precedent for every future POTUS to use against his political opponents.


The records Biden had in the garage from the Obama era could have been declassified by mere thought when Biden became POTUS , a ludicrous claim but that is your defense of Trump

It takes more than mere thought & nothing else.
No. Show me where the law encumbers a POTUS with any requirement for prior or subsequent action to achieve or effect declassification. There is none. Because the person who writes the orders for how all such things are to occur is the President of the United States. Any deviation he/she might make from policies they previously issued are presumed to be new policies. A POTUS cannot commit a security violation. IF the public does not like the way he/she handles classified records, they can vote him/her out of office.
Then Biden cannot commit a security violation because he "thought" the Obama docs were declassified on Jan 21

This is a ridiculous legal argument. Are Trump's lawyers still pleading this? If not, why not?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

and now, of course, Blackjack Smith is asking SCOTUS to comment on the question I noted above about presidential powers. z

SCOTUS is probably going to tell him to pound sand in the appellate courts like everyone else. Zero chance they circumscribe so the powers of the Presidency as the neverTrumpers so desperately need to get their man.

neverTrumpers are a far greater threat to the Constitution than Trump. They'll do ANYTHING to get their man.
Trump was a former president when he refused to surrender the docs
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:



Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
Nope. Biden was not POTUS when he committed the security violation.


I'm arguing that it takes more than mere thought, actually a claim with nothing more, to declassify retroactively. So I think Biden's are a violation

You're claiming that classified records kept at Mar. Lago can't be a violation because of a previously undisclosed "thought ".

The records Biden had in the garage from the Obama era could have been declassified by mere thought when Biden became POTUS , a ludicrous claim but that is your defense of Trump

It takes more than mere thought & nothing else.
The simple fact of the matter is that a functioning government does not prosecute the opposition party for process crimes. Merely having the documents (which I believe is all that is alleged) as opposed to using them for criminal purposes (or even shady political purposes), is not a crime that should cast the US into banana republic style politics.

Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:



Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
Nope. Biden was not POTUS when he committed the security violation.


I'm arguing that it takes more than mere thought, actually a claim with nothing more, to declassify retroactively. So I think Biden's are a violation

You're claiming that classified records kept at Mar. Lago can't be a violation because of a previously undisclosed "thought ".

The records Biden had in the garage from the Obama era could have been declassified by mere thought when Biden became POTUS , a ludicrous claim but that is your defense of Trump

It takes more than mere thought & nothing else.
The simple fact of the matter is that a functioning government does not prosecute the opposition party for process crimes. Merely having the documents (which I believe is all that is alleged) as opposed to using them for criminal purposes (or even shady political purposes), is not a crime that should cast the US into banana republic style politics.
I agree. What do you think when Trump says he will get even with government officials, especially his former staff?

muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

GrowlTowel said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:



Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
Nope. Biden was not POTUS when he committed the security violation.


I'm arguing that it takes more than mere thought, actually a claim with nothing more, to declassify retroactively. So I think Biden's are a violation

You're claiming that classified records kept at Mar. Lago can't be a violation because of a previously undisclosed "thought ".

The records Biden had in the garage from the Obama era could have been declassified by mere thought when Biden became POTUS , a ludicrous claim but that is your defense of Trump

It takes more than mere thought & nothing else.
The simple fact of the matter is that a functioning government does not prosecute the opposition party for process crimes. Merely having the documents (which I believe is all that is alleged) as opposed to using them for criminal purposes (or even shady political purposes), is not a crime that should cast the US into banana republic style politics.
I agree. What do you think when Trump says he will get even with government officials, especially his former staff?


I hope he rounds up all communists and takes them for helicopter rides.
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the IDF's intention is to drive all Palestinians from Gaza to the Sini. I can't remember another war where US weapons and latest technologies are waged against flip flops and rocks.
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

GrowlTowel said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:



Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
Nope. Biden was not POTUS when he committed the security violation.


I'm arguing that it takes more than mere thought, actually a claim with nothing more, to declassify retroactively. So I think Biden's are a violation

You're claiming that classified records kept at Mar. Lago can't be a violation because of a previously undisclosed "thought ".

The records Biden had in the garage from the Obama era could have been declassified by mere thought when Biden became POTUS , a ludicrous claim but that is your defense of Trump

It takes more than mere thought & nothing else.
The simple fact of the matter is that a functioning government does not prosecute the opposition party for process crimes. Merely having the documents (which I believe is all that is alleged) as opposed to using them for criminal purposes (or even shady political purposes), is not a crime that should cast the US into banana republic style politics.
I agree. What do you think when Trump says he will get even with government officials, especially his former staff?




In order to beat the democRats, you have to use their tactics against them. It is the only way they will learn.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
trey3216
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

I think the IDF's intention is to drive all Palestinians from Gaza to the Sini. I can't remember another war where US weapons and latest technologies are waged against flip flops and rocks.
one where the enemy wants to blend in with the civilians rather than look like a combatant.
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
Bear8084
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

I think the IDF's intention is to drive all Palestinians from Gaza to the Sini. I can't remember another war where US weapons and latest technologies are waged against flip flops and rocks.


Flip flops and rocks? Hamas and supporting militias have weapons supplied from Iran. Rockets, mines, drones, tandem RPGs, explosives, a variety of guns, etc. Israel has impressive military tech, but as with all urban warfare fights, it's still a slog.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trey3216 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

I think the IDF's intention is to drive all Palestinians from Gaza to the Sini. I can't remember another war where US weapons and latest technologies are waged against flip flops and rocks.
one where the enemy wants to blend in with the civilians rather than look like a combatant.

Like the Vietcong? There have been lots of examples in history of disproportionate warfare and one side relying on guerrilla tactics to even the odds. The U.S. used them against Britain in the War for Independence. Francis Marion and others managed to outfox the British well enough that they inspired Mel Gibson & The Patriot.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:



Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
Nope. Biden was not POTUS when he committed the security violation.


I'm arguing that it takes more than mere thought, actually a claim with nothing more, to declassify retroactively. So I think Biden's are a violation
Yes, but you're making the wrong argument. It's not the thought. It's the timeline. Biden was VPOTUS or Senator when the classified documents in question were carried to his personal home/office. He had no authority to declassify anything at that time, for any reason, by any act/thought. The only argument he has for escaping the espionage act is that he, by virtue of getting elected, gained an ability to ex post facto declassify them. Yes, he could argue that he "thought" them into declassified status AFTER BEING ELECTED, but does not that defense clearly support Trumps claims about "thought"?

You're claiming that classified records kept at Mar. Lago can't be a violation because of a previously undisclosed "thought."
Of course! No one would ever propose that a POTUS could be charged with carrying classified records to his residence, to his personal residence, in his personal car, on a hunting trip in Texas, on a shopping trip with Melania (because any such act would be presumed to be covered by originating authority). Same for showing a classified record to anyone, a foreign dignitary, a businessman of any nationality, a member of the press.....to accomplish whatever policy aime he saw fit. Trump, as POTUS, had the discretion to dispose of the records as he determined beneficial. NONE of that is contentious. Always assumed to have been so. And a federal court has recently ruled that such power extend to deeming presidential materials to be personal records to be taken with after leaving office for retention as personal files. (Clinton sock drawer) So it's hardly outlandish for Trump to argue that his decision (as POTUS) to decide that these documents were to be private records for retention at MAL after leaving office is within the realm of Presidential powers. Certainly it is not a criminal issue prosecutable under the Espionage Act. DOJ is wrong on the law here, but what's really outrageous is the choice to prosecute rather than litigate. DOJ could have asked a court to rule whether the sock drawer ruling applied to classified materials. If the court ruled against Trump, it could have issued the order for FBI to go get them. Problem solved.

But the documents were not the problem. TRUMP was the problem. He had to be destroyed. So they tossed the idea that the dispute was an issue about the limits of presidential powers, and decided to prosecute him for espionage. That is an outrageous politicization of prosecution, which would stand as a horrible precedent for every future POTUS to use against his political opponents.


The records Biden had in the garage from the Obama era could have been declassified by mere thought when Biden became POTUS , a ludicrous claim but that is your defense of Trump

It takes more than mere thought & nothing else.
No. Show me where the law encumbers a POTUS with any requirement for prior or subsequent action to achieve or effect declassification. There is none. Because the person who writes the orders for how all such things are to occur is the President of the United States. Any deviation he/she might make from policies they previously issued are presumed to be new policies. A POTUS cannot commit a security violation. IF the public does not like the way he/she handles classified records, they can vote him/her out of office.
Then Biden cannot commit a security violation because he "thought" the Obama docs were declassified on Jan 21

This is a ridiculous legal argument. Are Trump's lawyers still pleading this? If not, why not?
It's a ridiculous argument YOU made, not me.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

I think the IDF's intention is to drive all Palestinians from Gaza to the Sini. I can't remember another war where US weapons and latest technologies are waged against flip flops and rocks.


It is certainly starting to look that way, and the hostage rescue has fallen by the wayside. Hopefully this doesnt initiate hostilities with the Egyptians.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

and now, of course, Blackjack Smith is asking SCOTUS to comment on the question I noted above about presidential powers. z

SCOTUS is probably going to tell him to pound sand in the appellate courts like everyone else. Zero chance they circumscribe so the powers of the Presidency as the neverTrumpers so desperately need to get their man.

neverTrumpers are a far greater threat to the Constitution than Trump. They'll do ANYTHING to get their man.
Trump was a former president when he refused to surrender the docs
....who 1) had unlimited power to declassify the documents at the time he took possession of them (per statute), 2) had the power to determine what were personal and official records at the time he took them (per court ruling), and 3) has special standing as former POTUS to retain personal records (per statute).

Dude. This issue is a straight up question of limitations of Presidential powers. But the Biden Admin is making a CRIMINAL case out of it. It's an outrageous abuse of power by BIden, not Trump. You just like the tyranny because it's furthering your own political agendas.

You are part of the problem here.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:



Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
Nope. Biden was not POTUS when he committed the security violation.


I'm arguing that it takes more than mere thought, actually a claim with nothing more, to declassify retroactively. So I think Biden's are a violation

You're claiming that classified records kept at Mar. Lago can't be a violation because of a previously undisclosed "thought ".

The records Biden had in the garage from the Obama era could have been declassified by mere thought when Biden became POTUS , a ludicrous claim but that is your defense of Trump

It takes more than mere thought & nothing else.
The simple fact of the matter is that a functioning government does not prosecute the opposition party for process crimes. Merely having the documents (which I believe is all that is alleged) as opposed to using them for criminal purposes (or even shady political purposes), is not a crime that should cast the US into banana republic style politics.


word. we have a lot of people trying to "save the Republic" from Trump whose efforts are doing considerably more damage to the Republic than anything Trump has ever done.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

GrowlTowel said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:



Concept: the originating authority cannot be encumbered. To do so subordinates that authority to another,


Yeah, it was I can do it. If I think about it on the way to the toilet it is declassified, to "as I understand it". You don't see a backing off the position in that????

Originating authority cannot be encumbered, but the originating authority has to identify what is being declassified before it is declassified.
he can do so by simply revealing it, verbally or manually, without any prior action required. All Presidents have done so, frequently.
It can't be after the fact and the subordinates have to know what is being declassified. Without ANY documentation there is no way to prove it. He is screwed. Unless, there is document control. With your extensive knowledge of how this works, you are aware of document control? Try this to refresh your memory.
I had to worry about document control.....the officers under my command had to worry about document control....the officers above me had to worry about document control......because all of us had derivative authority to originate, possess, and use classified information derivative of POTUS, who has no such encumberance. No one else has the power to look at POTUS and say "oh, sir, you cannot do that!" because to do so would subordinate originating authority.

DoDM 5200.01 Vol 1, "DoD Information Security Program: Overview, Classification, and Declassification," February 24, 2012, Incorporating Change 2 on July 28, 2020 (whs.mil)

There are set requirements for how this happens. Trump just deciding to go to the Residence and thinking this is declassified is not part of this process. As I said, if there is no paper trail, which I believe there is not due to where we are, he is going to be found guilty. What that entails, who knows. But, to say he can't be encumbered is an oversimplification. For example,
No. There is no requirement that POTUS must fill out any forms, for either prior approval or to subsequently perfect an act. he/she may dispose at discretion. ALL procedures for classification, use, declassification flow from POTUS originating authority. Any deviations from protocols are presumed to be changes in protocols. Has always been so.

  • there are Presidential Memorandum dictating how this all occurs, did he rescind them before he determined what was declassified?
  • See above. Doesn't matter. Deviations from his instructed procedures are always presumed to be changes in procedure.
  • The documents generated in his 4 years may be found to be that he has the right to just declass. But anything originating from other Presidents he did not.
  • Nope. He may declassify or classify anything, regardless of what a predecessor or successor chose to do. Obama classifying something does not limit Trump's declassification of it. Similarly, Biden's classification of something Trump declassified is also binding. (and in fact, that was done in this particular case.....)
  • Was anything he declassified determined by NARA and the current administration to make the securing the US more difficult? That is not his call, but NARA and the current administration.
  • NARA cannot determine anything without superseding POTUS originating authority! They cannot say "you did not perfect your declassification" for reasons outlined above.

You worked in MI in the military. I worked 3 years in JAG, it is not as open shut as you would like to believe.

A President CANNOT commit a security violation.

The weakness in your analysis is, at every turn, an implicit assumption that a President has no more latitude than a Sergeant, Lieutenant, General, etc....that a POTUS must obey "the rules." Problem is, POTUS.....IS the rules. His/her actions require no prior approvals or process. They may act on discretion, and those actions are both dispositive and indicative.
Then the files in Biden's garage (from Obama era) were ex post facto declassified when Joe "thought" about it after Jan 20, 2021?
Ridiculous
Are Trump's lawyers even asserting the "mere thinking = declassification" defense?

No. Biden was not POTUS when he took those files to his garage, so he did not have original authority at that time. Now, he could have, solely upon his own determination, declassified them after his inauguration. Whether he would have had to execute a document to do so, or simply tell an investigator "those are now declassified" when asked, is within the realm of the argument Trump is making. But that would not have had the ex post facto effect you allege.
But you said "A President CANNOT commit a security violation.".

Now you are adding another requirement other than "I thought it, therefore it is."
Nope. Biden was not POTUS when he committed the security violation.


I'm arguing that it takes more than mere thought, actually a claim with nothing more, to declassify retroactively. So I think Biden's are a violation

You're claiming that classified records kept at Mar. Lago can't be a violation because of a previously undisclosed "thought ".

The records Biden had in the garage from the Obama era could have been declassified by mere thought when Biden became POTUS , a ludicrous claim but that is your defense of Trump

It takes more than mere thought & nothing else.
The simple fact of the matter is that a functioning government does not prosecute the opposition party for process crimes. Merely having the documents (which I believe is all that is alleged) as opposed to using them for criminal purposes (or even shady political purposes), is not a crime that should cast the US into banana republic style politics.
I agree. What do you think when Trump says he will get even with government officials, especially his former staff?


How, exactly, would you describe the accountability due to the people who abuse their official powers the way this admin is doing?
First Page Last Page
Page 63 of 198
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.