BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

cougar king said:

---

You cannot control a woman's body. Your wife and daughter are NOT your property contrary to what you think.

---

Good grief goober, nobody said they did control their wife or sisters body. Nor could they.

Otoh, a woman shouldn't be able to control the body of a human being that just happens to be living inside of her.
It is not her body. It is the body of another human being.

---

It's not "a human being living inside." It's a zygote then a fetus then a living breathing human being. "A God breathed into the man the breathe of life.

---

However in some states abortions are now legal for any reason right up until the baby's head passes through the birthing canal.

Such actions are an inexcusable abomination.
It is not your medical decision because you have a certain religious belief that does not out medically. It is none of your business.You did address these points which I assume means I am right.

---

---

When a "medical decision" involves the killing of a healthy, innocent human life, then it is no longer merely a medical decision, it becomes an ethical and moral one. And that involves ALL of society, therefore it most certainly is our business.

This isn't a hard concept. Libs and dems, please get this through to your head and stop posting the same stupid and tired arguments.

---

convenient. In your adjectives describing the type of decision you left out convenient.

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Any conservative/moderate the votes anyway but Republican right now is a fool.

The Democrat Party right now is a complete and total **** show.

---

I really dislike Cruz, he is a show pony, not a workhorse. Allred is likable, but …

I will be voting for Cruz because of Schumer/ Kavanaugh

---

Good to hear. Now you need to apply that same logic to the presidential election.

---

I'm a principled conservative
Schumer and Trump exhibit the same respect for the Constitution

---

We disagree. A principled conservative doesn't support Democrat candidates.

---

We need South Park to update the "fart smelling San Fran Liberal" skit....but for the fart smelling "principled conservative" who is always on a lonely island by himself being insufferably smug and thinking about how great and principled he is....

---

Being right sometimes being lonely

I'll let you guys with flexible/no principles try to convince yourselves Trump is conservative (Lol)

---

Perfect is the enemy of good

If you think letting Biden and Harris take the Presidency and install more Leftist Judges to the Federal bench and import in millions more 3rd worlders.....plus God knows what else...then don't stand there and tell us how you are serving our national interest.

---

I'm convinced, I won't vote for Harris
If Rs take the Senate, everything in your second paragraph won't happen, unless Trump is POTUS

---

Sounds like you still don't get it if you believe a non-vote for Harris is the answer.

---

Sounds like your principles are very flexible

---

Says the guy who voted for a radical abortion-on-demand and pro-illegal immigration candidate for Texas AG in 2022.

I'd say they're no more flexible than yours. The difference between us is, I know which side are the proverbial good guys.

ShooterTX said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

I still think he is a good guy. Grew up humble, stayed out if trouble and has been succesful in life.

Cruz is a lying pos. Trump insults his wife and a month later he announces he supports Trump. Cruz calls T a pathological liar then welcomes his support. He is a clown.

Voting for Colin will not make my kids of gdks gay or Tran. You do know there a openly gay republican leaders don't you.

I have never voted dem but I will choose between Colin or some unknown libertarian.

---

Colin and the rest of the Texas dems vote in lock step with Pelosi & AOC.
Supporting Colin is 100% Supporting the trans insanity, which is specifically targeting young children.
If you truly believe that voting dem won't adversely affect children... then you are very ignorant. They have made it clear for decades now that your children are actually "our children". The dems do not believe that you have parental rights. They believe that your kids belong to the state. This is exactly what they have said, over & over again. And now we can see what they plan to do with your kids.... trans & LGBT indoctrination.
You are a fool of you believe that they aren't trying to brainwash your kids.
They are telling you their agenda.... believe them.

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone - a distraction. On the other hand, their 'threat' is nothing when compared to Trump/Cruz, whose campaigns are built upon patently overt and unrepentant lies, anti-constitutional, anti-democratic, and even unchristian demagoguery. They are unpatriotic and in opposition to the basic values this country stands for, and the values said to be taught by Jesus. I wouldn't vote for Pelosi or AOC either. Better to vote your conscience if you can't vote for either. There is always an alternative.

Matt: 7: 15 "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits.Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

TexasScientist said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

I still think he is a good guy. Grew up humble, stayed out if trouble and has been succesful in life.

Cruz is a lying pos. Trump insults his wife and a month later he announces he supports Trump. Cruz calls T a pathological liar then welcomes his support. He is a clown.

Voting for Colin will not make my kids of gdks gay or Tran. You do know there a openly gay republican leaders don't you.

I have never voted dem but I will choose between Colin or some unknown libertarian.

---

Colin and the rest of the Texas dems vote in lock step with Pelosi & AOC.
Supporting Colin is 100% Supporting the trans insanity, which is specifically targeting young children.
If you truly believe that voting dem won't adversely affect children... then you are very ignorant. They have made it clear for decades now that your children are actually "our children". The dems do not believe that you have parental rights. They believe that your kids belong to the state. This is exactly what they have said, over & over again. And now we can see what they plan to do with your kids.... trans & LGBT indoctrination.
You are a fool of you believe that they aren't trying to brainwash your kids.
They are telling you their agenda.... believe them.

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone - a distraction. On the other hand, their 'threat' is nothing when compared to Trump/Cruz, whose campaigns are built upon patently overt and unrepentant lies, anti-constitutional, anti-democratic, and even unchristian demagoguery. They are unpatriotic and in opposition to the basic values this country stands for, and the values said to be taught by Jesus. I wouldn't vote for Pelosi or AOC either. Better to vote your conscience if you can't vote for either. There is always an alternative.

Matt: 7: 15 "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits.Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

---

Follow the science.

If that doesn't give you the answer you want, follow the money.

Mothra said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

I still think he is a good guy. Grew up humble, stayed out if trouble and has been succesful in life.

Cruz is a lying pos. Trump insults his wife and a month later he announces he supports Trump. Cruz calls T a pathological liar then welcomes his support. He is a clown.

Voting for Colin will not make my kids of gdks gay or Tran. You do know there a openly gay republican leaders don't you.

I have never voted dem but I will choose between Colin or some unknown libertarian.

---

Colin and the rest of the Texas dems vote in lock step with Pelosi & AOC.
Supporting Colin is 100% Supporting the trans insanity, which is specifically targeting young children.
If you truly believe that voting dem won't adversely affect children... then you are very ignorant. They have made it clear for decades now that your children are actually "our children". The dems do not believe that you have parental rights. They believe that your kids belong to the state. This is exactly what they have said, over & over again. And now we can see what they plan to do with your kids.... trans & LGBT indoctrination.
You are a fool of you believe that they aren't trying to brainwash your kids.
They are telling you their agenda.... believe them.

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone - a distraction. On the other hand, their 'threat' is nothing when compared to Trump/Cruz, whose campaigns are built upon patently overt and unrepentant lies, anti-constitutional, anti-democratic, and even unchristian demagoguery. They are unpatriotic and in opposition to the basic values this country stands for, and the values said to be taught by Jesus. I wouldn't vote for Pelosi or AOC either. Better to vote your conscience if you can't vote for either. There is always an alternative.

Matt: 7: 15 "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits.Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. In 2020, there was a peaceful transition of power. Trump stepped down, and the disaster that has been the Biden admin came to power. That will happen again in 2024. And 2028. Trump is no more a "threat" to democracy than you or I.

But I will tell you what is a threat to our way of life. Open borders, runaway inflation, wars throughout the world, a packed Supreme Court, and woke policies. There is NOTHING about the current admin that represents the values taught by Jesus or our founders.

If one is Christian and/or conservative, there is only one viable option this election cycle. And it's quite obvious.

P.S. You're also minimizing the trans issue. Read a statistic that the number of children identifying as trans or non-binary is around 20%. That is truly scary.

---

Quote:

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. In 2020, there was a peaceful transition of power. Trump stepped down, and the disaster that has been the Biden admin came to power. That will happen again in 2024. And 2028. Trump is no more a "threat" to democracy than you or I.

---

There wasn't a peaceful transfer. Notwithstanding the non-peaceful riot Trump unleashed, Trump unlawfully tried to overturn the election in the swing states by pressuring and cajoling state and elected and officials to rescind their certification of electors, and to embrace/substitute his fake slate of electors that he organized in each swing state. He pressured local election officials not to certify their vote counts. He unlawfully pressured the DOJ acting AG to write a letter falsely claiming widespread election fraud to state officials advising them to withdraw their certified electors. When non of that worked, he went to work on Pence to get him to unlawfully reject the certified electors in favor of his fake electors. When that didn't work he pressed Pence to send the certifications back to the states, or alternatively declare he couldn't determine the true electors and kick it to the House for them to elect the president. When that didn't work, he unleashed his mob that he summoned to DC on the Capitol to disrupt the certification proceedings - hardly a peaceful or lawful transition. He's an isolationist who will surrender western democratic values, and even Christian values around the world to Russia, China, and their allies. He has no appreciation of history, government, or importance of the US role on the world stage in the post WWII era.

Quote:

---

But I will tell you what is a threat to our way of life. Open borders, runaway inflation, wars throughout the world, a packed Supreme Court, and woke policies. There is NOTHING about the current admin that represents the values taught by Jesus or our founders.

---

Ok, I can agree with that. But there is NOTHING about Trump that represents the values taught by Jesus or our founders. He doesn't really care about borders except for a campaign issue because he torpedoed a bi-partisan border bill that we'll never get the chance again to pass, even if he is elected. He is as much responsible for inflation, that is down now, as Biden. Trump in one 4 year term added 8 trillion to the debt, as much as Obama did in two terms and as much as incurred in the first 200 years of our county. He is not a Conservative, nor a Christian. But, he did pack the SC.

Quote:

---

P.S. You're also minimizing the trans issue. Read a statistic that the number of children identifying as trans or non-binary is around 20%. That is truly scary.

---

Where did you get 20%? It's a sensationalized topic for the far right, but it's just not a serious threat to anyone. The stats are 0.6% 13 yrs. older identify as transgender, and no more than 1.4% age 13-17. While you and I may not understand it, it's an insignificant phenomena in terms of percentage of the overall population that's been around for millennia. It's not new, and it's not growing. It's just more visible today through communication technology and social media. It's only scary to some who are fearful of what they don't understand. It's a small aberration in the population.

Realitybites said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone.

---

"Four mass-casualty shooters in recent years the Aberdeen/Perryman, Md., shooter, one of the two STEM School shooters in Denver, the Club Q shooter in Colorado Springs, Colo., and the Covenant School shooter in Nashville, Tenn. were transgender or "non-binary," and the Perry High School shooter in Iowa apparently aligned with the cause of trans advocacy. Just this week, police in Montgomery County, Md., arrested a transgender high-school student in connection with alleged threats to shoot up an elementary school."

https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/04/why-the-rise-in-trans-shooters/

That particular variety of mental illness punches above its weight when it comes to violent behavior.

---

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-transgender-nashville-shooting-misinformation-cd62492d066d41e820c138256570978c

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/majority-of-us-mass-shooters-are-cis-men-not-transgender-or-non-binary-people-idUSL1N363273/

Out of thousands of shootings in the last 10 years, only four have been nonbinary (and one is questionable). 3,561 mass shootings since beginning of 2016, only 4 maybe non-cisgender. The rest are cisgender, so no one is hitting above their weight. Gun Violence Archive, since 2013 has recorded 4,400 mass shootings, and fewer than 10 suspects were trans. National Review is skewing their report to foster a false impression. Reuters - 0.5% of American adults identify as transgender, 0.1% of mass of shooters identify as transgender. Cisgender males make up 47.3% of the population, and they make up 98% of mass shooters - so who is hitting above their weight?

TexasScientist said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone.

---

"Four mass-casualty shooters in recent years the Aberdeen/Perryman, Md., shooter, one of the two STEM School shooters in Denver, the Club Q shooter in Colorado Springs, Colo., and the Covenant School shooter in Nashville, Tenn. were transgender or "non-binary," and the Perry High School shooter in Iowa apparently aligned with the cause of trans advocacy. Just this week, police in Montgomery County, Md., arrested a transgender high-school student in connection with alleged threats to shoot up an elementary school."

https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/04/why-the-rise-in-trans-shooters/

That particular variety of mental illness punches above its weight when it comes to violent behavior.

---

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-transgender-nashville-shooting-misinformation-cd62492d066d41e820c138256570978c

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/majority-of-us-mass-shooters-are-cis-men-not-transgender-or-non-binary-people-idUSL1N363273/

Out of hundreds of shootings in the last 10 years, only four have been nonbinary (and one is questionable). 3,561 mass shootings since beginning of 2016, only 4 maybe non-cisgender. The rest are cisgender, so no one is hitting above their weight. Gun Violence Archive, since 2013 has recorded 4,400 mass shootings, and fewer than 10 suspects were trans. National Review is skewing their report to foster a false impression. Reuters - 0.5% of American adults identify as transgender, 0.1% of mass of shooters identify as transgender. Cisgender males make up 47.3% of the population, and they make up 98% of mass shooters - so who is hitting above their weight?

---

mass shooters is stupid lump together phrase.. a gang shooting is a mass shooting. A shooting near school on sunday can be labeled as a school shooting

Context is your friend or continue your bias..

TexasScientist said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone.

---

"Four mass-casualty shooters in recent years the Aberdeen/Perryman, Md., shooter, one of the two STEM School shooters in Denver, the Club Q shooter in Colorado Springs, Colo., and the Covenant School shooter in Nashville, Tenn. were transgender or "non-binary," and the Perry High School shooter in Iowa apparently aligned with the cause of trans advocacy. Just this week, police in Montgomery County, Md., arrested a transgender high-school student in connection with alleged threats to shoot up an elementary school."

https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/04/why-the-rise-in-trans-shooters/

That particular variety of mental illness punches above its weight when it comes to violent behavior.

---

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-transgender-nashville-shooting-misinformation-cd62492d066d41e820c138256570978c

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/majority-of-us-mass-shooters-are-cis-men-not-transgender-or-non-binary-people-idUSL1N363273/

Out of hundreds of shootings in the last 10 years, only four have been nonbinary (and one is questionable). 3,561 mass shootings since beginning of 2016, only 4 maybe non-cisgender. The rest are cisgender, so no one is hitting above their weight. Gun Violence Archive, since 2013 has recorded 4,400 mass shootings, and fewer than 10 suspects were trans. National Review is skewing their report to foster a false impression. Reuters - 0.5% of American adults identify as transgender, 0.1% of mass of shooters identify as transgender. Cisgender males make up 47.3% of the population, and they make up 98% of mass shooters - so who is hitting above their weight?

---

From your first article:

James Alan Fox, a statistician and professor of criminology, law and public policy at Northeastern University, helps maintain the Associated Press-USA TODAY-Northeastern database of mass killings in the U.S., which does not contain full data on perpetrators' gender. The claims on social media this week amount to extreme cherry-picking of data, he said.


So is he saying "we don't keep that data, but we know you're wrong"?

Irrelvant since they self identify.

JXL said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone.

---

"Four mass-casualty shooters in recent years the Aberdeen/Perryman, Md., shooter, one of the two STEM School shooters in Denver, the Club Q shooter in Colorado Springs, Colo., and the Covenant School shooter in Nashville, Tenn. were transgender or "non-binary," and the Perry High School shooter in Iowa apparently aligned with the cause of trans advocacy. Just this week, police in Montgomery County, Md., arrested a transgender high-school student in connection with alleged threats to shoot up an elementary school."

https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/04/why-the-rise-in-trans-shooters/

That particular variety of mental illness punches above its weight when it comes to violent behavior.

---

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-transgender-nashville-shooting-misinformation-cd62492d066d41e820c138256570978c

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/majority-of-us-mass-shooters-are-cis-men-not-transgender-or-non-binary-people-idUSL1N363273/

Out of hundreds of shootings in the last 10 years, only four have been nonbinary (and one is questionable). 3,561 mass shootings since beginning of 2016, only 4 maybe non-cisgender. The rest are cisgender, so no one is hitting above their weight. Gun Violence Archive, since 2013 has recorded 4,400 mass shootings, and fewer than 10 suspects were trans. National Review is skewing their report to foster a false impression. Reuters - 0.5% of American adults identify as transgender, 0.1% of mass of shooters identify as transgender. Cisgender males make up 47.3% of the population, and they make up 98% of mass shooters - so who is hitting above their weight?

---

From your first article:

James Alan Fox, a statistician and professor of criminology, law and public policy at Northeastern University, helps maintain the Associated Press-USA TODAY-Northeastern database of mass killings in the U.S., which does not contain full data on perpetrators' gender. The claims on social media this week amount to extreme cherry-picking of data, he said.


So is he saying "we don't keep that data, but we know you're wrong"?

---

He's saying those who say there is an uptick in trans shooters are wrong.

This just in.....Neither Collin Alred or Ted Cruz will work at McDonald's today.

4th and Inches said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone.

---

"Four mass-casualty shooters in recent years the Aberdeen/Perryman, Md., shooter, one of the two STEM School shooters in Denver, the Club Q shooter in Colorado Springs, Colo., and the Covenant School shooter in Nashville, Tenn. were transgender or "non-binary," and the Perry High School shooter in Iowa apparently aligned with the cause of trans advocacy. Just this week, police in Montgomery County, Md., arrested a transgender high-school student in connection with alleged threats to shoot up an elementary school."

https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/04/why-the-rise-in-trans-shooters/

That particular variety of mental illness punches above its weight when it comes to violent behavior.

---

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-transgender-nashville-shooting-misinformation-cd62492d066d41e820c138256570978c

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/majority-of-us-mass-shooters-are-cis-men-not-transgender-or-non-binary-people-idUSL1N363273/

Out of hundreds of shootings in the last 10 years, only four have been nonbinary (and one is questionable). 3,561 mass shootings since beginning of 2016, only 4 maybe non-cisgender. The rest are cisgender, so no one is hitting above their weight. Gun Violence Archive, since 2013 has recorded 4,400 mass shootings, and fewer than 10 suspects were trans. National Review is skewing their report to foster a false impression. Reuters - 0.5% of American adults identify as transgender, 0.1% of mass of shooters identify as transgender. Cisgender males make up 47.3% of the population, and they make up 98% of mass shooters - so who is hitting above their weight?

---

mass shooters is stupid lump together phrase.. a gang shooting is a mass shooting. A shooting near school on sunday can be labeled as a school shooting

Context is your friend or continue your bias..

---

The continuing bias comes from those who want to vilify a small % of the population for political gain (e.g. Nazis marginalizing Jews/Gypsies/Gays). The context is overall mass shooters, which is a much larger sample population. The population of mass shooters who are kids that identify as trans is too small to draw any meaningful conclusions.

Half the kids at that age, in general, don't even know what they're talking about, or what they really think about anything. They go through all kinds of self identifications - imo.

JXL said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone.

---

"Four mass-casualty shooters in recent years the Aberdeen/Perryman, Md., shooter, one of the two STEM School shooters in Denver, the Club Q shooter in Colorado Springs, Colo., and the Covenant School shooter in Nashville, Tenn. were transgender or "non-binary," and the Perry High School shooter in Iowa apparently aligned with the cause of trans advocacy. Just this week, police in Montgomery County, Md., arrested a transgender high-school student in connection with alleged threats to shoot up an elementary school."

https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/04/why-the-rise-in-trans-shooters/

That particular variety of mental illness punches above its weight when it comes to violent behavior.

---

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-transgender-nashville-shooting-misinformation-cd62492d066d41e820c138256570978c

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/majority-of-us-mass-shooters-are-cis-men-not-transgender-or-non-binary-people-idUSL1N363273/

Out of hundreds of shootings in the last 10 years, only four have been nonbinary (and one is questionable). 3,561 mass shootings since beginning of 2016, only 4 maybe non-cisgender. The rest are cisgender, so no one is hitting above their weight. Gun Violence Archive, since 2013 has recorded 4,400 mass shootings, and fewer than 10 suspects were trans. National Review is skewing their report to foster a false impression. Reuters - 0.5% of American adults identify as transgender, 0.1% of mass of shooters identify as transgender. Cisgender males make up 47.3% of the population, and they make up 98% of mass shooters - so who is hitting above their weight?

---

From your first article:

James Alan Fox, a statistician and professor of criminology, law and public policy at Northeastern University, helps maintain the Associated Press-USA TODAY-Northeastern database of mass killings in the U.S., which does not contain full data on perpetrators' gender. The claims on social media this week amount to extreme cherry-picking of data, he said.


So is he saying "we don't keep that data, but we know you're wrong"?

---

It's the same logic as "why are you freaking out over 1% of trannies?" ... then "we must upend the world for 1% of trainnies."

TexasScientist said:

---

JXL said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone.

---

"Four mass-casualty shooters in recent years the Aberdeen/Perryman, Md., shooter, one of the two STEM School shooters in Denver, the Club Q shooter in Colorado Springs, Colo., and the Covenant School shooter in Nashville, Tenn. were transgender or "non-binary," and the Perry High School shooter in Iowa apparently aligned with the cause of trans advocacy. Just this week, police in Montgomery County, Md., arrested a transgender high-school student in connection with alleged threats to shoot up an elementary school."

https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/04/why-the-rise-in-trans-shooters/

That particular variety of mental illness punches above its weight when it comes to violent behavior.

---

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-transgender-nashville-shooting-misinformation-cd62492d066d41e820c138256570978c

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/majority-of-us-mass-shooters-are-cis-men-not-transgender-or-non-binary-people-idUSL1N363273/

Out of hundreds of shootings in the last 10 years, only four have been nonbinary (and one is questionable). 3,561 mass shootings since beginning of 2016, only 4 maybe non-cisgender. The rest are cisgender, so no one is hitting above their weight. Gun Violence Archive, since 2013 has recorded 4,400 mass shootings, and fewer than 10 suspects were trans. National Review is skewing their report to foster a false impression. Reuters - 0.5% of American adults identify as transgender, 0.1% of mass of shooters identify as transgender. Cisgender males make up 47.3% of the population, and they make up 98% of mass shooters - so who is hitting above their weight?

---

From your first article:

James Alan Fox, a statistician and professor of criminology, law and public policy at Northeastern University, helps maintain the Associated Press-USA TODAY-Northeastern database of mass killings in the U.S., which does not contain full data on perpetrators' gender. The claims on social media this week amount to extreme cherry-picking of data, he said.


So is he saying "we don't keep that data, but we know you're wrong"?

---

He's saying those who say there is an uptick in trans shooters are wrong.

---

How would he know if he doesn't track gender? Hmmm.

dude's communiss.

- iggy

go bears!

unsaddle the pokes!!

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

cougar king said:

---

You cannot control a woman's body. Your wife and daughter are NOT your property contrary to what you think.

---

Good grief goober, nobody said they did control their wife or sisters body. Nor could they.

Otoh, a woman shouldn't be able to control the body of a human being that just happens to be living inside of her.
It is not her body. It is the body of another human being.

---

It's not "a human being living inside." It's a zygote then a fetus then a living breathing human being. "A God breathed into the man the breathe of life.

---

However in some states abortions are now legal for any reason right up until the baby's head passes through the birthing canal.

Such actions are an inexcusable abomination.
It is not your medical decision because you have a certain religious belief that does not out medically. It is none of your business.You did address these points which I assume means I am right.

---

---

When a "medical decision" involves the killing of a healthy, innocent human life, then it is no longer merely a medical decision, it becomes an ethical and moral one. Every women who seeks an abortion is responsible for the consequences of that decision but it is none your business - medically, morally, or ethically. You may course have own moral or ethical opinion but you have no right to foist that opinion off on these women. You no right to tell a woman whether it is your wife, daughter, granddaughter that she carry a fetus to term. You may preach or teach otherwise to them but that is as far as it goes.

This isn't a hard concept. Libs and Dems, please get this through to your head and stop posting the same stupid and tired arguments. Why answer such a blatant lie? No, dem believes in 'killing of a healthy, innocent human life," That's a stupid straw man and you know.

---

KaiBear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

cougar king said:

---

You cannot control a woman's body. Your wife and daughter are NOT your property contrary to what you think.

---

Good grief goober, nobody said they did control their wife or sisters body. Nor could they.

Otoh, a woman shouldn't be able to control the body of a human being that just happens to be living inside of her.
It is not her body. It is the body of another human being.

---

It's not "a human being living inside." It's a zygote then a fetus then a living breathing human being. "A God breathed into the man the breathe of life.

---

However in some states abortions are now legal for any reason right up until the baby's head passes through the birthing canal.

Such actions are an inexcusable abomination.
It is not your medical decision because you have a certain religious belief that does not out medically. It is none of your business.You did address these points which I assume means I am right.

---

---

When a "medical decision" involves the killing of a healthy, innocent human life, then it is no longer merely a medical decision, it becomes an ethical and moral one. Every women who seeks an abortion is responsible for the consequences of that decision but it is none your business - medically, morally, or ethically. You may course have own moral or ethical opinion but you have no right to foist that opinion off on these women. You no right to tell a woman whether it is your wife, daughter, granddaughter that she carry a fetus to term. You may preach or teach otherwise to them but that is as far as it goes.

This isn't a hard concept. Libs and Dems, please get this through to your head and stop posting the same stupid and tired arguments. Why answer such a blatant lie? No, dem believes in 'killing of a healthy, innocent human life," That's a stupid straw man and you know.

---

---

You are deranged.

Dems have been attempting to legalize late term abortions ( right up to the moment of birth in some cases ) for

ANY OR NO REASON for several years now.





You are certainly aware of this , so why bother with your lies ?

---

That's why they never can pass a national abortion law because they cannot agree - too many want late-term abortion.

historian said:

---

Some Dems want after birth abortions legal. They are being open and blatant about their infanticide. If I'm not mistaken, some fascist states have laws that deny life saving treatment for babies who survive the murder attempt. Tampon Tim signed a law removing those protections in Minnesota.

Infanticide is sacred to them and they want it enshrined into law nationwide. They are willing to pack the Supreme Court, remove the filibuster, & anything else that will help them with that goal.

---

Candidly I would respect such honesty more than the deflection games so many abortionists play.

Same with the open borders crowd. My old foreman Santos hugely enjoys this immigration wave. Wants the entire Southwest to join with Mexico.

Obviously I don't agree with him, but I do respect him being straight forward about it.

I understand your thinking but I have trouble respecting people with evil agendas. It's more than merely disagreeing over a minor policy issue. The American Holocaust is of fundamental importance because it's mass murder on a scale surpassing Hitler or Stalin while rivaling that of Mao.

historian said:

---

I understand your thinking but I have trouble respecting people with evil agendas. It's more than merely disagreeing over a minor policy issue. The American Holocaust is of fundamental importance because it's mass murder on a scale surpassing Hitler or Stalin while rivaling that of Mao.

---

I stand corrected.

Just get so weary of the deflections people play.

Waco1947 said:

---

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

cougar king said:

---

You cannot control a woman's body. Your wife and daughter are NOT your property contrary to what you think.

---

Good grief goober, nobody said they did control their wife or sisters body. Nor could they.

Otoh, a woman shouldn't be able to control the body of a human being that just happens to be living inside of her.
It is not her body. It is the body of another human being.

---

It's not "a human being living inside." It's a zygote then a fetus then a living breathing human being. "A God breathed into the man the breathe of life.

---

However in some states abortions are now legal for any reason right up until the baby's head passes through the birthing canal.

Such actions are an inexcusable abomination.
It is not your medical decision because you have a certain religious belief that does not out medically. It is none of your business.You did address these points which I assume means I am right.

---

---

When a "medical decision" involves the killing of a healthy, innocent human life, then it is no longer merely a medical decision, it becomes an ethical and moral one. Every women who seeks an abortion is responsible for the consequences of that decision but it is none your business - medically, morally, or ethically. You may course have own moral or ethical opinion but you have no right to foist that opinion off on these women. You no right to tell a woman whether it is your wife, daughter, granddaughter that she carry a fetus to term. You may preach or teach otherwise to them but that is as far as it goes.

This isn't a hard concept. Libs and Dems, please get this through to your head and stop posting the same stupid and tired arguments. Why answer such a blatant lie? No, dem believes in 'killing of a healthy, innocent human life," That's a stupid straw man and you know.

---

---

Late term abortion (after viability) is just wrong (absent extraordinary circumstances)

Mothra said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

I still think he is a good guy. Grew up humble, stayed out if trouble and has been succesful in life.

Cruz is a lying pos. Trump insults his wife and a month later he announces he supports Trump. Cruz calls T a pathological liar then welcomes his support. He is a clown.

Voting for Colin will not make my kids of gdks gay or Tran. You do know there a openly gay republican leaders don't you.

I have never voted dem but I will choose between Colin or some unknown libertarian.

---

Colin and the rest of the Texas dems vote in lock step with Pelosi & AOC.
Supporting Colin is 100% Supporting the trans insanity, which is specifically targeting young children.
If you truly believe that voting dem won't adversely affect children... then you are very ignorant. They have made it clear for decades now that your children are actually "our children". The dems do not believe that you have parental rights. They believe that your kids belong to the state. This is exactly what they have said, over & over again. And now we can see what they plan to do with your kids.... trans & LGBT indoctrination.
You are a fool of you believe that they aren't trying to brainwash your kids.
They are telling you their agenda.... believe them.

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone - a distraction. On the other hand, their 'threat' is nothing when compared to Trump/Cruz, whose campaigns are built upon patently overt and unrepentant lies, anti-constitutional, anti-democratic, and even unchristian demagoguery. They are unpatriotic and in opposition to the basic values this country stands for, and the values said to be taught by Jesus. I wouldn't vote for Pelosi or AOC either. Better to vote your conscience if you can't vote for either. There is always an alternative.

Matt: 7: 15 "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits.Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. In 2020, there was a peaceful transition of power. Trump stepped down, and the disaster that has been the Biden admin came to power. That will happen again in 2024. And 2028. Trump is no more a "threat" to democracy than you or I.

But I will tell you what is a threat to our way of life. Open borders, runaway inflation, wars throughout the world, a packed Supreme Court, and woke policies. There is NOTHING about the current admin that represents the values taught by Jesus or our founders.

If one is Christian and/or conservative, there is only one viable option this election cycle. And it's quite obvious.

P.S. You're also minimizing the trans issue. Read a statistic that the number of children identifying as trans or non-binary is around 20%. That is truly scary.

---

Your view of the gospel and mine are radically different. Hating on immigrants is not something I think Jesus would encourage.

Frank Galvin said:

---

Mothra said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

I still think he is a good guy. Grew up humble, stayed out if trouble and has been succesful in life.

Cruz is a lying pos. Trump insults his wife and a month later he announces he supports Trump. Cruz calls T a pathological liar then welcomes his support. He is a clown.

Voting for Colin will not make my kids of gdks gay or Tran. You do know there a openly gay republican leaders don't you.

I have never voted dem but I will choose between Colin or some unknown libertarian.

---

Colin and the rest of the Texas dems vote in lock step with Pelosi & AOC.
Supporting Colin is 100% Supporting the trans insanity, which is specifically targeting young children.
If you truly believe that voting dem won't adversely affect children... then you are very ignorant. They have made it clear for decades now that your children are actually "our children". The dems do not believe that you have parental rights. They believe that your kids belong to the state. This is exactly what they have said, over & over again. And now we can see what they plan to do with your kids.... trans & LGBT indoctrination.
You are a fool of you believe that they aren't trying to brainwash your kids.
They are telling you their agenda.... believe them.

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. The % of trans people minuscule. There's not enough of them to seriously threaten or impact anyone - a distraction. On the other hand, their 'threat' is nothing when compared to Trump/Cruz, whose campaigns are built upon patently overt and unrepentant lies, anti-constitutional, anti-democratic, and even unchristian demagoguery. They are unpatriotic and in opposition to the basic values this country stands for, and the values said to be taught by Jesus. I wouldn't vote for Pelosi or AOC either. Better to vote your conscience if you can't vote for either. There is always an alternative.

Matt: 7: 15 "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits.Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

---

You're making a mountain out of a mole hill. In 2020, there was a peaceful transition of power. Trump stepped down, and the disaster that has been the Biden admin came to power. That will happen again in 2024. And 2028. Trump is no more a "threat" to democracy than you or I.

But I will tell you what is a threat to our way of life. Open borders, runaway inflation, wars throughout the world, a packed Supreme Court, and woke policies. There is NOTHING about the current admin that represents the values taught by Jesus or our founders.

If one is Christian and/or conservative, there is only one viable option this election cycle. And it's quite obvious.

P.S. You're also minimizing the trans issue. Read a statistic that the number of children identifying as trans or non-binary is around 20%. That is truly scary.

---

Your view of the gospel and mine are radically different. Hating on immigrants is not something I think Jesus would encourage.

---

What is the gospel, in your view?