nein51 said:

---

Hear me out.

A) They are going to lose and they know it. Running Harris is like calling someone you don't want to call at a time you're almost sure they aren't going to be around. You get credit for having called but you don't actually have to talk to anyone.

B) They get all the credit for running a black woman knowing full well they aren't going to win and just get started on 2028. They get to call everyone racists and sexist and misogynist for not voting for their black woman which makes them feel good inside.

Trump, if he can keep his mouth shut for about 100 days, wins in an absolute landslide. "Joe was always a tough competitor and foe. I wish him the best in his retirement"…now let's spam the airways with how hand picking a nominee with no vote and no convention goes against 200+ years of what American "democracy" and freedom means. Add her VP ratings on a loop. Add any host of her word salad and cackling.

If Republicans cant slam dunk this election there's really no reason to have a party any longer.

---

A - Knowing this reality unquestionably necessitates a protectionist move. The dam is about to burst on the Democrats, regardless of the outcome of the election. If Trump wins, Biden can then step down and let Harris ascend for the purpose of wholesale pardons. If Harris wins, Biden can serve up the pardons on his way out of the door. This is something the Republicans could not do in 1974 for anyone but Nixon. In 2024, the Democrats have no compunction for excusing far more serious behavior than that displayed by Hunt, Haldeman, Segretti, McCord, Dean, Liddy, et al.

B- This is their promotable election narrative. They hope to paint anyone who does not vote for Harris as a racist; emblematic of the racist-soluble nature of America. They will continue to tout the failures of the administration as unprecedented successes regardless of the absurdity. It will take three cycles of Republican presidential occupancy to cleanse the Democratic party of the culprits, and this move allows them Constitutional authority to parachute them safely.

The big question will be if black men and some women - suffering the most under Brown's "border czar" policies - will vote for her just for Didn't Earn It reasons or will vote for policy. Trump's biggest growth has been with black men - will they vote for her just because she's half black.

Live shot at the Democratic party pic.twitter.com/zQQQinU7Xb

— Not Jerome Powell (@alifarhat79) July 21, 2024

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

When Harris dropped out of the 2020 Democratic primaries she was polling about 3%
and was totally decimated by anybody with any ability in debates.

Not saying democrats can't win. Of course they can.

I don't underestimate Trumps ability to screw up a good thing.

---

That's what happens when you have a relative unknonwn, Harris, in the 2020 debates. Handed the office of Vice-President and now candidate for President makes an unknown a shoe in for a close race now that she has been public for four years.

This is why we cannot get rid of incompetent incumbents. Voters rubber stamp the ballots.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

The big question will be if black men and some women - suffering the most under Brown's "border czar" policies - will vote for her just for Didn't Earn It reasons or will vote for policy. Trump's biggest growth has been with black men - will they vote for her just because she's half black.

---

No they will not. Black men know black women.

nein51 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

nein51 said:

---

Hear me out.

They are going to lose and they know it. Running Harris is like calling someone you don't want to call at a time you're almost sure they aren't going to be around. You get credit for having called but you don't actually have to talk to anyone.

They get all the credit for running a black woman knowing full well they aren't going to win and just get started on 2028. They get to call everyone racists and sexist and misogynist for not voting for their black woman which makes them feel good inside.

Trump, if he can keep his mouth shut for about 100 days, wins in an absolute landslide. "Joe was always a tough competitor and foe. I wish him the best in his retirement"…now let's spam the airways with how hand picking a nominee with no vote and no convention goes against 200+ years of what American "democracy" and freedom means. Add her VP ratings on a loop. Add any host of her word salad and cackling.

If Republicans cant slam dunk this election there's really no reason to have a party any longer.

---

Donors don't give away hundreds of millions of dollars to a candidate they assume is going to lose.

90% of the media is going to glorify Harris.
90% of the media is going to hysterically vilify Trump.

Voter harvesting in certain precincts of Detroit, Philadelphia, Atlanta and Chicago will magically result in 120% 'voter' turnouts.

Illegals will be voting by the thousands in Arizona, California and New Mexico.

Harris could easily be our last president.

---

Donors have already given away hundreds of millions of dollars and lots of democrats are "anyone but Biden" because they don't think he can win. The problem is she can't win either.

She's going to get the people who vote (D) no matter what but unless Trump can't help himself she's not going to get more than that. The media isn't going to do anything they aren't already doing. Orange man bad, Harris is the smartest person on earth and our only hope to save democracy (oh the irony).

Trump, however, may be the one person on earth who can screw this up. This is Baylor-UNLV and Trump is capt carrot. All he has to do is take a knee.

There's a lesson here though; suck the right dick$ along the way and you can go really far in your career even if you're terrible and unqualified.

---

[Your analysis is correct] For the love of God can we please stop opening up the UNLV wound.

https://babylonbee.com/news/jill-biden-drops-out-of-presidential-race

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Harris and how we, Democrats, handles her nomination is our problem so righties thank you very your input no...wait the GOP's concerns are immaterial.

---

It's a religion and politics forum. Of course every opinion is equally valid.

Tell you what, going by your standard, Trump is the republicans problem.

So why don't you never say another damned word about Trump on here since
obviously in your mind your opinion is immaterial.

---

Well played. You are of course right. Say what you want about Harris/Biden So post away
but not all opinions are valid
Ido not think "All opinions are valid, simply by virtue of being that person's sincerely held perspective".

a)but I do think some opinions are valid across the board is automatically valid like "My opinion is that almond fudge ice cream' is as valid as "No, it's not vanilla is." There is no way to disprove these opinions.

b) Or the opinion has a reasonable basis - so long as we recognize it for what it is, just their unprovable view and nothing more.
That's different from treating it as actual fact. Here's one from Johnny Bear "Rest assured the MSM will portray any criticism of her - no matter how well founded - as "racist" and/or "misogynistic"
This is not reasonable until he show such comments by MSM
Here's another "WH Chief of Staff apparently informed the Cabinet, not the President. That is very irregular. All of this is peculiar, to say the least." 'Apparently' is not a fact but an opinion so all that follows is not valid.
One more Busytarp "And they forced him out on National Ice Cream Day, to boot." 'Forced is an opinion and not a fact.
However, once there is evidence that impacts the validity, then it becomes testable. If the opinion passes the test, it gets promoted to "fact". If it fails the test, that is reasonable basis for disbelief.
Unknown author

---

Obviously Waco47's day nurse has upped his dosage again .

Let's recap this historic day:

• Joe Biden suddenly *RESIGNS* via @X
• White House staff find out ONE MINUTE later
• Joe Biden "resignation" letter not on official letterhead
• Biden "signature" suspect (underlined?)
• Steve Richetti helped write letter
• Jill Biden… pic.twitter.com/4ySTXj619L

— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) July 22, 2024

Doc Holliday said:

---

Where the hell is Biden?

My gut feeling is that they'll announce he's damn near dead by the end of the week. Or maybe he actually is dead.

---

I am wondering the same thing , my friend. Perhaps he is on his deathbed and we just haven't been told.

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Where the hell is Biden?

My gut feeling is that they'll announce he's damn near dead by the end of the week. Or maybe he actually is dead.

---

I am wondering the same thing , my friend. Perhaps he is on his deathbed and we just haven't been told.

---

Maybe in a coma. He's obviously been on lots of drugs which easily could put someone his age into a coma.

I'm in love with Tulsi!

Let us not forget the last time Kamala tried to be president. pic.twitter.com/cdympnCig2

— Amit Shah (Parody) (@Motabhai012) July 22, 2024

I feel like Kamala Harris will become President before Jan 20th no matter the election...that is why they are pumping her up to be worthy of it.

Whoever runs Joe's account just updated his header to Harris For President.

The coup is complete. pic.twitter.com/dD5t8FST9i

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 22, 2024

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Harris and how we, Democrats, handles her nomination is our problem so righties thank you very your input no...wait the GOP's concerns are immaterial.

---

It's a religion and politics forum. Of course every opinion is equally valid.

Tell you what, going by your standard, Trump is the republicans problem.

So why don't you never say another damned word about Trump on here since
obviously in your mind your opinion is immaterial.

---

Well played. You are of course right. Say what you want about Harris/Biden So post away
but not all opinions are valid
Ido not think "All opinions are valid, simply by virtue of being that person's sincerely held perspective".

a)but I do think some opinions are valid across the board is automatically valid like "My opinion is that almond fudge ice cream' is as valid as "No, it's not vanilla is." There is no way to disprove these opinions.

b) Or the opinion has a reasonable basis - so long as we recognize it for what it is, just their unprovable view and nothing more.
That's different from treating it as actual fact. Here's one from Johnny Bear "Rest assured the MSM will portray any criticism of her - no matter how well founded - as "racist" and/or "misogynistic"
This is not reasonable until he show such comments by MSM
Here's another "WH Chief of Staff apparently informed the Cabinet, not the President. That is very irregular. All of this is peculiar, to say the least." 'Apparently' is not a fact but an opinion so all that follows is not valid.
One more Busytarp "And they forced him out on National Ice Cream Day, to boot." 'Forced is an opinion and not a fact.
However, once there is evidence that impacts the validity, then it becomes testable. If the opinion passes the test, it gets promoted to "fact". If it fails the test, that is reasonable basis for disbelief.
Unknown author

---

Oh goodness, sometimes I wish I didn't post what I post. Of course you can post about Trump, I was just being tongue in cheek. Sorry.

We can all post about what we want and there is some validity to it virtually always.

The human experience puts us all, way closer together as people than some want to admit. There is not this vast difference of experience among "tribal" groups.

We all experience joy, we all experience grief, we all experience gain, we all experience loss, we all experience pain, we are all subject to the limits of the human experience no matter how wealthy or how poor we are.

It is a real shame the separation people choose to have from others simply because their upbringing is different, their economic situation is different, or their culture or race or religion are different.

I reject all these separations, and if someone is simply decent, I consider them my brother as a human being.

If Joe Biden is on death's doorstep and Kamala would become President before the election, that is why the Dems are uniting behind her now to actually WIN the election to be President.

They can't have Kamala be President for 6 months while advocating for Gavin, Whitmer, etc. etc.
If Joe doesn't survive, it's all in for Kamala.

What's the Plan if President Joe Biden Dies Between Now and the Election? (wweek.com)

I’m going to make my stance abundantly clear.

I don’t care who she slept with. Don’t care about her laugh, I am not going to dehumanize her or disrespect her based on her personal life. Who doesn’t have a past and she is grown. Don’t care if she is too Black for some and not… pic.twitter.com/czvpeJmRaB

— Deon Joseph (@ofcrdeonjoseph) July 22, 2024

PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND BODY PART TRAFFICKING

Kamala Harris tried to have this reporter silenced after he uncovered her powerful donors at Planned Parenthood involvement in the trafficking and sale of body parts. pic.twitter.com/KTeJPd2En7

— Redpill Drifter (@RedpillDrifter) November 21, 2023

Whitmer saying no. She was their best option for the Rust Belt states. Shapiro being Jewish will cause problems in MI. Can you spell Mark Kelly? Maybe Jared Polis?

Today, not only am I fired up to endorse @KamalaHarris for President of the United States, I’m proud to serve as a co-chair of her campaign.

In Vice President Harris, Michigan voters have a candidate they can count on to lower their costs, protect their freedoms, and build an… pic.twitter.com/f57SCl6itj

— Gretchen Whitmer (@gretchenwhitmer) July 22, 2024

Reminder that no one has publicly seen the President since last WEDNESDAY. #WhereIsJoeBiden pic.twitter.com/zfWVjjZS0I

— Isabel Brown (@theisabelb) July 22, 2024

Democrats anti Trump progression

“Womanizer womanizer womanizer”

Didn’t work

“He dangerous dangerous dangerous”

Didn’t work

“Racist racist racist”

Didn’t work

“Russia Russia Russia.”

Didn’t work

“Fascist fascist fascist”

Didn’t work

“Threat to democracy democracy…

— Deon Joseph (@ofcrdeonjoseph) July 22, 2024

There are loads of great interviews with her. I disagree with her on a number of issues but I think the country would be better off with her vs either of the morons we will actually choose from.

No

I can’t get enough of these 😂 pic.twitter.com/nRQF8ckSgI

— Brandon Tatum (@TheOfficerTatum) July 22, 2024

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Harris and how we, Democrats, handles her nomination is our problem so righties thank you very your input no...wait the GOP's concerns are immaterial.

---

It's a religion and politics forum. Of course every opinion is equally valid.

Tell you what, going by your standard, Trump is the republicans problem.

So why don't you never say another damned word about Trump on here since
obviously in your mind your opinion is immaterial.

---

Well played. You are of course right. Say what you want about Harris/Biden So post away
but not all opinions are valid
Ido not think "All opinions are valid, simply by virtue of being that person's sincerely held perspective".

a)but I do think some opinions are valid across the board is automatically valid like "My opinion is that almond fudge ice cream' is as valid as "No, it's not vanilla is." There is no way to disprove these opinions.

b) Or the opinion has a reasonable basis - so long as we recognize it for what it is, just their unprovable view and nothing more.
That's different from treating it as actual fact. Here's one from Johnny Bear "Rest assured the MSM will portray any criticism of her - no matter how well founded - as "racist" and/or "misogynistic"
This is not reasonable until he show such comments by MSM
Here's another "WH Chief of Staff apparently informed the Cabinet, not the President. That is very irregular. All of this is peculiar, to say the least." 'Apparently' is not a fact but an opinion so all that follows is not valid.
One more Busytarp "And they forced him out on National Ice Cream Day, to boot." 'Forced is an opinion and not a fact.
However, once there is evidence that impacts the validity, then it becomes testable. If the opinion passes the test, it gets promoted to "fact". If it fails the test, that is reasonable basis for disbelief.
Unknown author

---

Oh goodness, sometimes I wish I didn't post what I post. Of course you can post about Trump, I was just being tongue in cheek. Sorry.

We can all post about what we want and there is some validity to it virtually always.

The human experience puts us all, way closer together as people than some want to admit. There is not this vast difference of experience among "tribal" groups.

We all experience joy, we all experience grief, we all experience gain, we all experience loss, we all experience pain, we are all subject to the limits of the human experience no matter how wealthy or how poor we are.

It is a real shame the separation people choose to have from others simply because their upbringing is different, their economic situation is different, or their culture or race or religion are different.

I reject all these separations, and if someone is simply decent, I consider them my brother as a human being.

---

I did not know you were tongue in cheek. Still your criticisms of me is correct. I was being hypocritical. We may both for or against candidates but still some opinions can and must challenged for validity

BellCountyBear said:

---

If he's not fit to run for president, he's not fit to BE president.

---

This is certainly true. To think, most of the country felt they either had to vote for Trump or a guy with dementia...