Is Islam a political ideology of conquest more than a religion?

31,390 Views | 472 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by Redbrickbear
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySpeaking said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Porteroso said:

whiterock said:

Porteroso said:

Islam, Judaism, and Christianity are very closely related religions that have all been used for immense good and evil. In a state like Iran, it is used to reinforce a political ideology, much like Christianity was used in Europe to crusade.

Blaming the religion itself is a stupid brain dead thing to do. Just look at all the peaceful Muslims in the world. Look who are terrorists and attempting jihad. It is mostly Iran and its proxies. And virtually all other Muslims hate them.

Tell us you don't know what you're talking about without saying you don't know what you're talking about…..

I'm sorry, you post such stupid things, unless you are willing to post content, I'm not really into trading insults. Come up with something that makes sense first.

I eat shawarma at least once a month, so you know my credentials before I begin. The crusades were a response to 400 years of Islamic invasions and oppression.


The crusades used religion for conquest. Everyone invaded each other back then. Don't pretend it was just Muslims. The crusades united many peoples under 1 religious banner.

Rational adults do not pretend like a reaction is the same as instigation.

Are you that ignorant of history? To think Muslims just out of nowhere invaded parts of Europe before the Crusades?

Anyways the point of the thread was whether Islam is a religion of conquest or not. I've made my point, that all 3 of the Abrahamic religions have used their text for mass conquest. Today, very few of each believes in conquest.

Uh, they kinda did? Are you familiar with the Islamic conquests against the Christian Byzantine state that started in the 630s AD? They invaded Christian Spain in 711 AD. The first Crusade was not until 1095 AD.

Hey, Porter. Check out the map. In 732, Charles "The Hammer" Martel defeated the Umayyid Army that had invaded France. It was no border incursion. It was 137 miles southeast of Paris. It was the high water mark of islamic expansion in Western Europe, sending the Umayyids back to Spain where they ruled wholly or partly for 700 more years.

Despite what critical theories have instructed you, the actual historical fact is that the Crusades were a response to centuries of relentless islamic crusades in Europe, which continued for a millennium and did not end until 900 years AFTER the battle of Tours, when Jan Sobieski and his Polish army of Hussars shattered an Ottoman Army besieging Vienna in the largest cavalry charge in history. Only about 10k Ottoman troops returned home. Grand Vizier Kara Mustafa Pasha made it as far as Belgrade, where he was executed on orders of the Sultan. The Ottoman Empire never recovered, and went into steady decline to become "the sick man of Europe" in barely more than a century.




You might have heard of Martel's grandson = Charlemagne.


whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I swear....if a liberal's lips are moving, they're lying.
(although many of them do genuinely believe the lie).
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySpeaking said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Porteroso said:

whiterock said:

Porteroso said:

Islam, Judaism, and Christianity are very closely related religions that have all been used for immense good and evil. In a state like Iran, it is used to reinforce a political ideology, much like Christianity was used in Europe to crusade.

Blaming the religion itself is a stupid brain dead thing to do. Just look at all the peaceful Muslims in the world. Look who are terrorists and attempting jihad. It is mostly Iran and its proxies. And virtually all other Muslims hate them.

Tell us you don't know what you're talking about without saying you don't know what you're talking about…..

I'm sorry, you post such stupid things, unless you are willing to post content, I'm not really into trading insults. Come up with something that makes sense first.

I eat shawarma at least once a month, so you know my credentials before I begin. The crusades were a response to 400 years of Islamic invasions and oppression.


The crusades used religion for conquest. Everyone invaded each other back then. Don't pretend it was just Muslims. The crusades united many peoples under 1 religious banner.

Rational adults do not pretend like a reaction is the same as instigation.

Are you that ignorant of history? To think Muslims just out of nowhere invaded parts of Europe before the Crusades?

Anyways the point of the thread was whether Islam is a religion of conquest or not. I've made my point, that all 3 of the Abrahamic religions have used their text for mass conquest. Today, very few of each believes in conquest.

Uh, they kinda did? Are you familiar with the Islamic conquests against the Christian Byzantine state that started in the 630s AD? They invaded Christian Spain in 711 AD. The first Crusade was not until 1095 AD.

Exactly. And that's only a brief summary.
It's amazing how often people discuss history when they are ignorant of it.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySpeaking said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


Yet your "humanist" secular ideology could not even go a few decades before it went straight into mass murder and bloodshed on a historic level.

100+ million corpses lay at your door step and you dare speak to us of the humanity of your secularism?



Secular humanism is not what led to the atrocities you assert. Humanism stands in opposition to such ideologies. Religious zeal in fielty to state or church is responsible for most of the world's oppression.


"Real Secularism has never been tried"

You wont accept the extremists on your side as being from your side.

So then why should peaceful Buddhists accept being lumped in with radical Wahabi Islamists?

Or why should Pentecostal Christians accept being blamed for things a medieval Pope did 1,000 years ago?

In your world everything done in the name of a religion is the fault of all religious people.

But nothing that secularists do (Nazis, Communists, French revolutionaries) is ever the fault of secularism and atheism.

Amazing double standard

You forget Nazi Germany was statist country overwhelmingly populated with Christians. You confuse secularism with humanism. The U. S. is a secular country. Secular countries are capable of atrocities.


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party. There was some resistance among Catholic clergy, and lay people, but there was even more complaisance and support, and even worse Catholic assistence with escape of Nazi war criminals. I've posted about this before extensively in another thread. Fr. Charles Coughlin, a precursor to Rush Limbaught like radio talk shows, was a Catholic pro Nazi, pro Facist, anti-Semitic right here in the US. With such a majority of professing Christians in Germany, if they resisted the Nazi party would not have prevailed. Which begs the quesstion, why didn't Jesus lead the way?

The bottom line, is Christianity doesn't have any historic moral high ground to stand on greater than any other religion or social construct. It's 'moral tenets' pigggy back on and are rooted in ancient Jewish and Canaanite laws, traditions, and myths, and are often compromised for expediency of the times, or its own theological objectives.





Fr. Charles Coughlin was a progressive who criticized capitalism in the name of "social justice" and advocated nationalizing the banks and was for "living wages."

And he was an FDR supporter before he wasn't.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

I swear....if a liberal's lips are moving, they're lying.
(although many of them do genuinely believe the lie).

A lie is still a lie no matter who believes it. For example, a man can never become a woman no matter how much he thinks he can. And contrary to Leftist mental illness, saying the truth is not violence.

I know it's unrelated, but Leftists lie about everything and react the same way when called out on it. Increasingly, they violent, especially those who are mentally unstable.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


Yet your "humanist" secular ideology could not even go a few decades before it went straight into mass murder and bloodshed on a historic level.

100+ million corpses lay at your door step and you dare speak to us of the humanity of your secularism?



Secular humanism is not what led to the atrocities you assert. Humanism stands in opposition to such ideologies. Religious zeal in fielty to state or church is responsible for most of the world's oppression.


"Real Secularism has never been tried"

You wont accept the extremists on your side as being from your side.

So then why should peaceful Buddhists accept being lumped in with radical Wahabi Islamists?

Or why should Pentecostal Christians accept being blamed for things a medieval Pope did 1,000 years ago?

In your world everything done in the name of a religion is the fault of all religious people.

But nothing that secularists do (Nazis, Communists, French revolutionaries) is ever the fault of secularism and atheism.

Amazing double standard

You forget Nazi Germany was statist country overwhelmingly populated with Christians. You confuse secularism with humanism. The U. S. is a secular country. Secular countries are capable of atrocities.


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party. There was some resistance among Catholic clergy, and lay people, but there was even more complaisance and support, and even worse Catholic assistence with escape of Nazi war criminals. I've posted about this before extensively in another thread. Fr. Charles Coughlin, a precursor to Rush Limbaught like radio talk shows, was a Catholic pro Nazi, pro Facist, anti-Semitic right here in the US. With such a majority of professing Christians in Germany, if they resisted the Nazi party would not have prevailed. Which begs the quesstion, why didn't Jesus lead the way?

The bottom line, is Christianity doesn't have any historic moral high ground to stand on greater than any other religion or social construct. It's 'moral tenets' pigggy back on and are rooted in ancient Jewish and Canaanite laws, traditions, and myths, and are often compromised for expediency of the times, or its own theological objectives.

Again, you miss the obvious.

Let me repeat this for you again. I will keep repeatiing it for you until you actually read it'

The largest church in Germany was the German Evangelical Church that included Lutheran, Reformed and United. It had about 40 million people in it in the 1920s out of a 60 million population. The rest were Roman Catholic

The population was strongly anti-Communist and that's how the Nazi's got started along with the resentment forward the international community for the Treaty of Versailles

The Nazi's stated policy fighting Communism made them very popular everywhere, just as they would have been celebrated her post WWI/Russian Revolution of 1917.

In the 1920s, some of the more radical of the German Evangelical Church formed a spinoff group called the German Christian Church, meanwhile another opposing church took the rest of the Lutherans in a different direction, the German Confessing Church.

German Christians Church: This group, largely aligned with Nazi ideology of fighting Communism, aimed to integrate the Protestant Church into the Nazi state.

Confessing Church: This dissenting faction, initially formed as the Pastors' Emergency League, opposed the German Christians' efforts to Nazify the church.

Hitler didn't take control of the Nazi's until 1933.

By 1934, the Confessing Church included around 7,000 pastors, a significant number considering there were 18,000 Protestant pastors in total. While the Nazi party had significant influence, the German Christians did not represent a majority of the Protestant population.

Focus: The German Christians sought to align Protestantism with Nazi ideology, while the Confessing Church focused on maintaining the autonomy and independence of the church.

Hence, most Lutherans were not part of the Nazi regime but instead fought against it. Look up Dietrich Bonhoeffer for example

---------------------

While it's difficult to pinpoint an exact number, it's estimated that several thousand members of the German Confessing Church were murdered by the Nazis. The Nazis persecuted the Confessing Church, a Protestant movement that resisted the Nazi regime's attempts to control the church. Many pastors and members were arrested, imprisoned, and even killed for their opposition.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

The Confessing Church:
This Protestant movement emerged in opposition to the Nazi-backed "Reich Church" which sought to align Protestantism with Nazi ideology, according to Britannica.
Resistance:

The Confessing Church actively resisted Nazi control, particularly regarding euthanasia and the persecution of Jews, according to Britannica.

Persecution:
The Nazis responded with increasing pressure, including arrests, imprisonment, and even murder of Confessing Church members, according to Britannica.

Notable Figures:
Individuals like Martin Niemöller and Dietrich Bonhoeffer, key figures in the Confessing Church, were arrested and imprisoned for their opposition.

Extent of Persecution:
While the exact number of those killed is not precisely known, Wikipedia says it is clear that the Nazis targeted the Confessing Church, including clergy and members, for their resistance to Nazi ideology. Additionally many members of the Confessing Church were murdered

And .... you miss the obvious. Despite what essentially was token resistance (not in some individual cases), the Nazi party was composed of "Christian members," Protestants and Catholics. It was the only way they could have reached or maintained power. Over 94% of the population was Protestant and Catholic. They were complicit.

I'm a simple man with simple arguments. Unfortunately, you are more of a simpleton. Good luck with your future endeavor.

You got the first part right at least. You only understand what you want to understand. Anything else is outside your ability or willingness.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


Yet your "humanist" secular ideology could not even go a few decades before it went straight into mass murder and bloodshed on a historic level.

100+ million corpses lay at your door step and you dare speak to us of the humanity of your secularism?



Secular humanism is not what led to the atrocities you assert. Humanism stands in opposition to such ideologies. Religious zeal in fielty to state or church is responsible for most of the world's oppression.


"Real Secularism has never been tried"

You wont accept the extremists on your side as being from your side.

So then why should peaceful Buddhists accept being lumped in with radical Wahabi Islamists?

Or why should Pentecostal Christians accept being blamed for things a medieval Pope did 1,000 years ago?

In your world everything done in the name of a religion is the fault of all religious people.

But nothing that secularists do (Nazis, Communists, French revolutionaries) is ever the fault of secularism and atheism.

Amazing double standard

You forget Nazi Germany was statist country overwhelmingly populated with Christians. You confuse secularism with humanism. The U. S. is a secular country. Secular countries are capable of atrocities.


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party. There was some resistance among Catholic clergy, and lay people, but there was even more complaisance and support, and even worse Catholic assistence with escape of Nazi war criminals. I've posted about this before extensively in another thread. Fr. Charles Coughlin, a precursor to Rush Limbaught like radio talk shows, was a Catholic pro Nazi, pro Facist, anti-Semitic right here in the US. With such a majority of professing Christians in Germany, if they resisted the Nazi party would not have prevailed. Which begs the quesstion, why didn't Jesus lead the way?

The bottom line, is Christianity doesn't have any historic moral high ground to stand on greater than any other religion or social construct. It's 'moral tenets' pigggy back on and are rooted in ancient Jewish and Canaanite laws, traditions, and myths, and are often compromised for expediency of the times, or its own theological objectives.

Again, you miss the obvious.

Let me repeat this for you again. I will keep repeatiing it for you until you actually read it'

The largest church in Germany was the German Evangelical Church that included Lutheran, Reformed and United. It had about 40 million people in it in the 1920s out of a 60 million population. The rest were Roman Catholic

The population was strongly anti-Communist and that's how the Nazi's got started along with the resentment forward the international community for the Treaty of Versailles

The Nazi's stated policy fighting Communism made them very popular everywhere, just as they would have been celebrated her post WWI/Russian Revolution of 1917.

In the 1920s, some of the more radical of the German Evangelical Church formed a spinoff group called the German Christian Church, meanwhile another opposing church took the rest of the Lutherans in a different direction, the German Confessing Church.

German Christians Church: This group, largely aligned with Nazi ideology of fighting Communism, aimed to integrate the Protestant Church into the Nazi state.

Confessing Church: This dissenting faction, initially formed as the Pastors' Emergency League, opposed the German Christians' efforts to Nazify the church.

Hitler didn't take control of the Nazi's until 1933.

By 1934, the Confessing Church included around 7,000 pastors, a significant number considering there were 18,000 Protestant pastors in total. While the Nazi party had significant influence, the German Christians did not represent a majority of the Protestant population.

Focus: The German Christians sought to align Protestantism with Nazi ideology, while the Confessing Church focused on maintaining the autonomy and independence of the church.

Hence, most Lutherans were not part of the Nazi regime but instead fought against it. Look up Dietrich Bonhoeffer for example

---------------------

While it's difficult to pinpoint an exact number, it's estimated that several thousand members of the German Confessing Church were murdered by the Nazis. The Nazis persecuted the Confessing Church, a Protestant movement that resisted the Nazi regime's attempts to control the church. Many pastors and members were arrested, imprisoned, and even killed for their opposition.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

The Confessing Church:
This Protestant movement emerged in opposition to the Nazi-backed "Reich Church" which sought to align Protestantism with Nazi ideology, according to Britannica.
Resistance:

The Confessing Church actively resisted Nazi control, particularly regarding euthanasia and the persecution of Jews, according to Britannica.

Persecution:
The Nazis responded with increasing pressure, including arrests, imprisonment, and even murder of Confessing Church members, according to Britannica.

Notable Figures:
Individuals like Martin Niemöller and Dietrich Bonhoeffer, key figures in the Confessing Church, were arrested and imprisoned for their opposition.

Extent of Persecution:
While the exact number of those killed is not precisely known, Wikipedia says it is clear that the Nazis targeted the Confessing Church, including clergy and members, for their resistance to Nazi ideology. Additionally many members of the Confessing Church were murdered

And .... you miss the obvious. Despite what essentially was token resistance (not in some individual cases), the Nazi party was composed of "Christian members," Protestants and Catholics. It was the only way they could have reached or maintained power. Over 94% of the population was Protestant and Catholic. They were complicit.

I'm a simple man with simple arguments. Unfortunately, you are more of a simpleton. Good luck with your future endeavor.

You got the first part right at least. You only understand what you want to understand. Anything else is outside your ability or willingness.

In this argument, you have shown your Simple Jack side.
"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


Yet your "humanist" secular ideology could not even go a few decades before it went straight into mass murder and bloodshed on a historic level.

100+ million corpses lay at your door step and you dare speak to us of the humanity of your secularism?



Secular humanism is not what led to the atrocities you assert. Humanism stands in opposition to such ideologies. Religious zeal in fielty to state or church is responsible for most of the world's oppression.


"Real Secularism has never been tried"

You wont accept the extremists on your side as being from your side.

So then why should peaceful Buddhists accept being lumped in with radical Wahabi Islamists?

Or why should Pentecostal Christians accept being blamed for things a medieval Pope did 1,000 years ago?

In your world everything done in the name of a religion is the fault of all religious people.

But nothing that secularists do (Nazis, Communists, French revolutionaries) is ever the fault of secularism and atheism.

Amazing double standard

You forget Nazi Germany was statist country overwhelmingly populated with Christians. You confuse secularism with humanism. The U. S. is a secular country. Secular countries are capable of atrocities.


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party.





You seem incapable of understanding that having some members of a religious group inside a political Party....does NOT make that Party a supporter of a specific religion...nor that religions adherents supporters of the said Party.

Catholics as a group were especially known as non-Nazi party supporters.

Catholics voted on mass for the Center party throughout the 1920s and 1930s

Catholic majority areas of Germany were in fact where the Nazi party got its lowest vote levels and saw the least support.

[Catholic bishops in Germany warned against the Nazis and some Bishops forbid party membership in the 1920s and 30s....
  • Specific bans: The bishop of Mainz explicitly excommunicated Catholic members of the Nazi Party in his diocese in 1930. The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano also stated that membership was "irreconcilable with the Catholic conscience".
  • Widespread condemnation: In 1931, the bishops of Paderborn and Freiburg issued similar warnings, while Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich called for a warning against Nazism because its views were "not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine"]


It's not just some members. It was an overwhelming percentage of Germans, primarily Protestants and Catholics who were members of the party itself. That is my point. A majority of Christians were complicit. You can't deny or refute that. Kudos to those who resisted and even lost their lives trying to do the right thing. But overall, Christians were complicit.


The Nazi party itself did not even have many members actually.

"In the 1920s the Nazi party had less than 80,000 members.

1933: After Hitler was appointed chancellor in January, membership increased rapidly, reaching around 850,000 by the end of the year."

When Hitler took power it still has less than 1 million

Germany had a population of 66-67 million in 1933

The vast majority of Germans were not Nazi party members or party voters

And of the party itself it was more agnostic and Lutheran by member.

[Most Germans belonged to a Christian church, with the Nazi Party membership mirroring this demographic.
Protestant majority:
Protestants, especially Lutherans, were over-represented in the Nazi Party's membership and electorate, particularly in Northern Germany.
Catholic minority:
Catholics were under-represented in the party, as many voted for the Catholic Centre Party instead. However, some high-ranking Nazis, including Hitler himself, were nominal Catholics from Southern Germany…]

You are attacking Christians…because a criminal party had religious demographics that mirrored the country it was in..

I guess you think the Muslims in Gaza have no responsiblity for Hamas gaining control in Gaza, or Hamas's actions against the Jews. I guess Patton was out of line requiring the citizens of Eisenach to tour Buchenwald.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


Yet your "humanist" secular ideology could not even go a few decades before it went straight into mass murder and bloodshed on a historic level.

100+ million corpses lay at your door step and you dare speak to us of the humanity of your secularism?



Secular humanism is not what led to the atrocities you assert. Humanism stands in opposition to such ideologies. Religious zeal in fielty to state or church is responsible for most of the world's oppression.


"Real Secularism has never been tried"

You wont accept the extremists on your side as being from your side.

So then why should peaceful Buddhists accept being lumped in with radical Wahabi Islamists?

Or why should Pentecostal Christians accept being blamed for things a medieval Pope did 1,000 years ago?

In your world everything done in the name of a religion is the fault of all religious people.

But nothing that secularists do (Nazis, Communists, French revolutionaries) is ever the fault of secularism and atheism.

Amazing double standard

You forget Nazi Germany was statist country overwhelmingly populated with Christians. You confuse secularism with humanism. The U. S. is a secular country. Secular countries are capable of atrocities.


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party.





You seem incapable of understanding that having some members of a religious group inside a political Party....does NOT make that Party a supporter of a specific religion...nor that religions adherents supporters of the said Party.

Catholics as a group were especially known as non-Nazi party supporters.

Catholics voted on mass for the Center party throughout the 1920s and 1930s

Catholic majority areas of Germany were in fact where the Nazi party got its lowest vote levels and saw the least support.

[Catholic bishops in Germany warned against the Nazis and some Bishops forbid party membership in the 1920s and 30s....
  • Specific bans: The bishop of Mainz explicitly excommunicated Catholic members of the Nazi Party in his diocese in 1930. The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano also stated that membership was "irreconcilable with the Catholic conscience".
  • Widespread condemnation: In 1931, the bishops of Paderborn and Freiburg issued similar warnings, while Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich called for a warning against Nazism because its views were "not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine"]


It's not just some members. It was an overwhelming percentage of Germans, primarily Protestants and Catholics who were members of the party itself. That is my point. A majority of Christians were complicit. You can't deny or refute that. Kudos to those who resisted and even lost their lives trying to do the right thing. But overall, Christians were complicit.


The Nazi party itself did not even have many members actually.

"In the 1920s the Nazi party had less than 80,000 members.

1933: After Hitler was appointed chancellor in January, membership increased rapidly, reaching around 850,000 by the end of the year."

When Hitler took power it still has less than 1 million

Germany had a population of 66-67 million in 1933

The vast majority of Germans were not Nazi party members or party voters

And of the party itself it was more agnostic and Lutheran by member.

[Most Germans belonged to a Christian church, with the Nazi Party membership mirroring this demographic.
Protestant majority:
Protestants, especially Lutherans, were over-represented in the Nazi Party's membership and electorate, particularly in Northern Germany.
Catholic minority:
Catholics were under-represented in the party, as many voted for the Catholic Centre Party instead. However, some high-ranking Nazis, including Hitler himself, were nominal Catholics from Southern Germany…]

You are attacking Christians…because a criminal party had religious demographics that mirrored the country it was in..

Most Lutherans were members of The Confessing Church, the ones that were against everything the Nazi's stood for

Where is the evidence, other than verbal insincerity, backed by genuine action or commitment? How many Lutherans joined resistance fighters?
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


Yet your "humanist" secular ideology could not even go a few decades before it went straight into mass murder and bloodshed on a historic level.

100+ million corpses lay at your door step and you dare speak to us of the humanity of your secularism?



Secular humanism is not what led to the atrocities you assert. Humanism stands in opposition to such ideologies. Religious zeal in fielty to state or church is responsible for most of the world's oppression.


"Real Secularism has never been tried"

You wont accept the extremists on your side as being from your side.

So then why should peaceful Buddhists accept being lumped in with radical Wahabi Islamists?

Or why should Pentecostal Christians accept being blamed for things a medieval Pope did 1,000 years ago?

In your world everything done in the name of a religion is the fault of all religious people.

But nothing that secularists do (Nazis, Communists, French revolutionaries) is ever the fault of secularism and atheism.

Amazing double standard

You forget Nazi Germany was statist country overwhelmingly populated with Christians. You confuse secularism with humanism. The U. S. is a secular country. Secular countries are capable of atrocities.


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party.





You seem incapable of understanding that having some members of a religious group inside a political Party....does NOT make that Party a supporter of a specific religion...nor that religions adherents supporters of the said Party.

Catholics as a group were especially known as non-Nazi party supporters.

Catholics voted on mass for the Center party throughout the 1920s and 1930s

Catholic majority areas of Germany were in fact where the Nazi party got its lowest vote levels and saw the least support.

[Catholic bishops in Germany warned against the Nazis and some Bishops forbid party membership in the 1920s and 30s....
  • Specific bans: The bishop of Mainz explicitly excommunicated Catholic members of the Nazi Party in his diocese in 1930. The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano also stated that membership was "irreconcilable with the Catholic conscience".
  • Widespread condemnation: In 1931, the bishops of Paderborn and Freiburg issued similar warnings, while Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich called for a warning against Nazism because its views were "not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine"]


It's not just some members. It was an overwhelming percentage of Germans, primarily Protestants and Catholics who were members of the party itself. That is my point. A majority of Christians were complicit. You can't deny or refute that. Kudos to those who resisted and even lost their lives trying to do the right thing. But overall, Christians were complicit.


The Nazi party itself did not even have many members actually.

"In the 1920s the Nazi party had less than 80,000 members.

1933: After Hitler was appointed chancellor in January, membership increased rapidly, reaching around 850,000 by the end of the year."

When Hitler took power it still has less than 1 million

Germany had a population of 66-67 million in 1933

The vast majority of Germans were not Nazi party members or party voters

And of the party itself it was more agnostic and Lutheran by member.

[Most Germans belonged to a Christian church, with the Nazi Party membership mirroring this demographic.
Protestant majority:
Protestants, especially Lutherans, were over-represented in the Nazi Party's membership and electorate, particularly in Northern Germany.
Catholic minority:
Catholics were under-represented in the party, as many voted for the Catholic Centre Party instead. However, some high-ranking Nazis, including Hitler himself, were nominal Catholics from Southern Germany…]

You are attacking Christians…because a criminal party had religious demographics that mirrored the country it was in..

I guess you think the Muslims in Gaza have no responsiblity for Hamas gaining control in Gaza, or Hamas's actions against the Jews. I guess Patton was out of line requiring the citizens of Eisenach to tour Buchenwald.


Well Hamas is a specific ISLAMIST political party

It ran on an Islamic platform of the Muslim Brotherhood style.

Its very name is actually the "Islamic Resistance Movement" ....Hamas is an acronym in Arabic for that offical name... arakah al-Muqwamah al-Islmiyyah

The Nazi party in German and the Communist party in China never ran on a Christian or Buddhist platform. Or held themselves out as being religious based parties.

PS

That being said I would certainly not blame all Palestinian for that criminal party. Hamas never won a election in the West Bank at all....only winning an election in Gaza.

And similar to other criminal parties in the past that took power by force. It won a single election in Gaza in 2006...then ended democracy there and never held another election again. Winning only 44% of the vote in the general election.

And it ran on a anti-corruption campaign...that was its big election selling point…not a war with Israel or a genocide campaign.

Obviously it lied and intended to be corrupt and hold power forever.

[According to the results, Hamas won the large majority of the constituency seats but was more narrowly ahead on the lists. Fatah (party) did beat Hamas in the constituencies in Qalqilya, Rafah, and Jericho. Jenin was split evenly, and Fatah (party) won the seats reserved for Christians in Bethlehem, Jerusalem, and Ramallah. Khalidi cites Hamas winning....areas as evidence that many voters' motivation was "to throw out the Fatah incumbents, whose strategy had failed and who were seen as corrupt and unresponsive to popular demands."]



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Palestinian_legislative_election
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

TexasScientist said:

historian said:

No. National socialists were far Left

The Nazi Party, officially the National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or NSDAP), was a far-LEFT political party in Germany active between 1920 and 1945 that created and supported the ideology of Nazism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party#:~:text=The%20Nazi%20Party%2C%20officially%20the,supported%20the%20ideology%20of%20Nazism.

FIFY
Wikipedia is notoriously wrong on many things. This is another example. It's a common mistake because most people don't know the truth. (They did get the German name correct). Most of us were taught incorrectly in school by Leftist teachers and professors repeating the lie that defies all facts and common sense. Nazi is a shortened form of National Socialist with Socialist being the key word in understanding who they were.

As noted above, the Nazis were no more Christian than the demographics of any other large group. Maybe some of them were nominally "Christian", probably those who called themselves "Christian" because they were baptized or attended church on Christmas and Easter. They were not "Christians" in the Christian sense, that is by God's definition. They were almost certainly the kind of "Christians" Christ said he did not know because they did not truly follow Him:

"Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?' And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!'" Matthew 7:21-23 NKJV

And none of this makes the Nazi Party a Christian organization. Nothing about Nazism follows Christian principles as evidenced by Christ's two greatest commandments:

"Jesus replied: 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments." Mathew 22:37-40 NIV

You are convincing no-one except yourself, and that's only because you are too arrogant and stubborn to see the truth. The only way one can truly understand God and come to Christ is through humility and repentance.


Ok so if we add socialist to MAGA, MAGA Socialist make you a lefty. It's generally accepted that Facism and Nazi ideals are far right in the political spectrum.

The rest of what you wrote is nonsense, and underscores the contradictions of so called scripture.

I would add that Christians in Nazi Germany clearly turned a blind eye to the atrocities they and their countrymen were commtting, and Christianity is deficient as a moral compass. The reason it is deficient is because its roots origninate in culutures that excuse violence and atrocities.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party.





You seem incapable of understanding that having some members of a religious group inside a political Party....does NOT make that Party a supporter of a specific religion...nor that religions adherents supporters of the said Party.

Catholics as a group were especially known as non-Nazi party supporters.

Catholics voted on mass for the Center party throughout the 1920s and 1930s

Catholic majority areas of Germany were in fact where the Nazi party got its lowest vote levels and saw the least support.

[Catholic bishops in Germany warned against the Nazis and some Bishops forbid party membership in the 1920s and 30s....
  • Specific bans: The bishop of Mainz explicitly excommunicated Catholic members of the Nazi Party in his diocese in 1930. The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano also stated that membership was "irreconcilable with the Catholic conscience".
  • Widespread condemnation: In 1931, the bishops of Paderborn and Freiburg issued similar warnings, while Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich called for a warning against Nazism because its views were "not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine"]


It's not just some members. It was an overwhelming percentage of Germans, primarily Protestants and Catholics who were members of the party itself. That is my point. A majority of Christians were complicit. You can't deny or refute that. Kudos to those who resisted and even lost their lives trying to do the right thing. But overall, Christians were complicit.


The Nazi party itself did not even have many members actually.

"In the 1920s the Nazi party had less than 80,000 members.

1933: After Hitler was appointed chancellor in January, membership increased rapidly, reaching around 850,000 by the end of the year."

When Hitler took power it still has less than 1 million

Germany had a population of 66-67 million in 1933

The vast majority of Germans were not Nazi party members or party voters

And of the party itself it was more agnostic and Lutheran by member.

[Most Germans belonged to a Christian church, with the Nazi Party membership mirroring this demographic.
Protestant majority:
Protestants, especially Lutherans, were over-represented in the Nazi Party's membership and electorate, particularly in Northern Germany.
Catholic minority:
Catholics were under-represented in the party, as many voted for the Catholic Centre Party instead. However, some high-ranking Nazis, including Hitler himself, were nominal Catholics from Southern Germany…]

You are attacking Christians…because a criminal party had religious demographics that mirrored the country it was in..

Most Lutherans were members of The Confessing Church, the ones that were against everything the Nazi's stood for

Where is the evidence, other than verbal insincerity, backed by genuine action or commitment? How many Lutherans joined resistance fighters?

You need to look no further than the pacifist Dietrich Bonhoeffer. A Lutheran Pastor who participated in setting up the bomb that almost killed Hitler. The SS arrested in April 1943, Dietrich was held at several locations, starting in Berlin-Tegel prison and later transferred to the Gestapo prison on Prinz-Albert-Strasse. As the Allied forces advanced, he was moved to the Buchenwald concentration camp in February 1945 and finally to Flossenburg concentration camp. He was executed at Flossenburgn April 9, 1945.

"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:




Stupid, suicidal, arrogantly provocative, criminal public endangerment

He should have been arrested. If he's a non-citizen he should be deported.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

historian said:

TexasScientist said:

historian said:

No. National socialists were far Left

The Nazi Party, officially the National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or NSDAP), was a far-LEFT political party in Germany active between 1920 and 1945 that created and supported the ideology of Nazism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party#:~:text=The%20Nazi%20Party%2C%20officially%20the,supported%20the%20ideology%20of%20Nazism.

FIFY
Wikipedia is notoriously wrong on many things. This is another example. It's a common mistake because most people don't know the truth. (They did get the German name correct). Most of us were taught incorrectly in school by Leftist teachers and professors repeating the lie that defies all facts and common sense. Nazi is a shortened form of National Socialist with Socialist being the key word in understanding who they were.

As noted above, the Nazis were no more Christian than the demographics of any other large group. Maybe some of them were nominally "Christian", probably those who called themselves "Christian" because they were baptized or attended church on Christmas and Easter. They were not "Christians" in the Christian sense, that is by God's definition. They were almost certainly the kind of "Christians" Christ said he did not know because they did not truly follow Him:

"Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?' And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!'" Matthew 7:21-23 NKJV

And none of this makes the Nazi Party a Christian organization. Nothing about Nazism follows Christian principles as evidenced by Christ's two greatest commandments:

"Jesus replied: 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments." Mathew 22:37-40 NIV

You are convincing no-one except yourself, and that's only because you are too arrogant and stubborn to see the truth. The only way one can truly understand God and come to Christ is through humility and repentance.


Ok so if we add socialist to MAGA, MAGA Socialist make you a lefty. It's generally accepted that Facism and Nazi ideals are far right in the political spectrum.

The rest of what you wrote is nonsense, and underscores the contradictions of so called scripture.

I would add that Christians in Nazi Germany clearly turned a blind eye to the atrocities they and their countrymen were commtting, and Christianity is deficient as a moral compass. The reason it is deficient is because its roots origninate in culutures that excuse violence and atrocities.


It might be generally accepted that fascism & Nazism are ideas of the right but it's a lie. There are a lot of lies that are generally accepted: Hunter's laptop, Russiagate, the ludicrous idea that socialism works, the climate cult (no, we are not destroying the planet), the trans cult (a man cannot become a woman, ever), "Trump is literally Hitler" (Hitler has been dead 80 years), every time a Leftist labels Trump or his supporters a fascist, and many more examples.

You continue making the false argument that the Nazis were Christian's. No they weren't. That lie has already been debunked but Leftists arrogantly stick with their lies no matter how absurd or how much contrary to the facts. Ironically, that is a common characteristic of genuine fascism which makes sense because it is an ideology of the Left.

To be honest, it's easy and naturally for people to turn a blind eye to evils in their midst. Whether it's the crimes of the Nazis, the crimes of the Bolsheviks (or any other communist regime), Apartheid, the crimes of antifa, the covid & vax hoaxes, abortion in demand, the trans cult, or many other example from history. It takes courage to do the right thing and stand up to evil. Few people have the courage of a Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Dietrich Boenhoefer, Rosa Parks, MLK, Raul Wallenberg, Charlie Kirk, etc. That courage is what makes them real heroes.

I will always take God's word over the contradictions of foolish philosophies and arrogance. Scripture, on the other hand, is always accurate 100% of the time and has repeatedly been proven so for centuries. Any fake contradictions are based upon misinterpretations, usually blatant, including taking passages out of context off red distorting usually clear meaning. In other words, lying about it. I will grant that some scriptures are more difficult to understand than others (apocalyptic literature, parables, poetry, etc) but they can be understood to some extent if approached honestly and with humility.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:



What's his opinion of Hamas? October 7? The refusal of Hamas to release the hostages?

Those answers would be far more revealing than any Islamofascist propaganda.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Should have been obvious
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:



Hopefully, someone in Canada sees this. It's going, Allah Akbar quickly
"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party.





You seem incapable of understanding that having some members of a religious group inside a political Party....does NOT make that Party a supporter of a specific religion...nor that religions adherents supporters of the said Party.

Catholics as a group were especially known as non-Nazi party supporters.

Catholics voted on mass for the Center party throughout the 1920s and 1930s

Catholic majority areas of Germany were in fact where the Nazi party got its lowest vote levels and saw the least support.

[Catholic bishops in Germany warned against the Nazis and some Bishops forbid party membership in the 1920s and 30s....
  • Specific bans: The bishop of Mainz explicitly excommunicated Catholic members of the Nazi Party in his diocese in 1930. The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano also stated that membership was "irreconcilable with the Catholic conscience".
  • Widespread condemnation: In 1931, the bishops of Paderborn and Freiburg issued similar warnings, while Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich called for a warning against Nazism because its views were "not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine"]


It's not just some members. It was an overwhelming percentage of Germans, primarily Protestants and Catholics who were members of the party itself. That is my point. A majority of Christians were complicit. You can't deny or refute that. Kudos to those who resisted and even lost their lives trying to do the right thing. But overall, Christians were complicit.


The Nazi party itself did not even have many members actually.

"In the 1920s the Nazi party had less than 80,000 members.

1933: After Hitler was appointed chancellor in January, membership increased rapidly, reaching around 850,000 by the end of the year."

When Hitler took power it still has less than 1 million

Germany had a population of 66-67 million in 1933

The vast majority of Germans were not Nazi party members or party voters

And of the party itself it was more agnostic and Lutheran by member.

[Most Germans belonged to a Christian church, with the Nazi Party membership mirroring this demographic.
Protestant majority:
Protestants, especially Lutherans, were over-represented in the Nazi Party's membership and electorate, particularly in Northern Germany.
Catholic minority:
Catholics were under-represented in the party, as many voted for the Catholic Centre Party instead. However, some high-ranking Nazis, including Hitler himself, were nominal Catholics from Southern Germany…]

You are attacking Christians…because a criminal party had religious demographics that mirrored the country it was in..

Most Lutherans were members of The Confessing Church, the ones that were against everything the Nazi's stood for

Where is the evidence, other than verbal insincerity, backed by genuine action or commitment? How many Lutherans joined resistance fighters?

You need to look no further than the pacifist Dietrich Bonhoeffer. A Lutheran Pastor who participated in setting up the bomb that almost killed Hitler. The SS arrested in April 1943, Dietrich was held at several locations, starting in Berlin-Tegel prison and later transferred to the Gestapo prison on Prinz-Albert-Strasse. As the Allied forces advanced, he was moved to the Buchenwald concentration camp in February 1945 and finally to Flossenburg concentration camp. He was executed at Flossenburgn April 9, 1945.



And he should be commended for what he did. He is an example of what all Christians, and Germans for that matter, should have done. He is an exceptional Christian, who had integrity. That still doesn't override or excuse the fact that Germany was a predominantly Christian nation.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party.





You seem incapable of understanding that having some members of a religious group inside a political Party....does NOT make that Party a supporter of a specific religion...nor that religions adherents supporters of the said Party.

Catholics as a group were especially known as non-Nazi party supporters.

Catholics voted on mass for the Center party throughout the 1920s and 1930s

Catholic majority areas of Germany were in fact where the Nazi party got its lowest vote levels and saw the least support.

[Catholic bishops in Germany warned against the Nazis and some Bishops forbid party membership in the 1920s and 30s....
  • Specific bans: The bishop of Mainz explicitly excommunicated Catholic members of the Nazi Party in his diocese in 1930. The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano also stated that membership was "irreconcilable with the Catholic conscience".
  • Widespread condemnation: In 1931, the bishops of Paderborn and Freiburg issued similar warnings, while Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich called for a warning against Nazism because its views were "not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine"]


It's not just some members. It was an overwhelming percentage of Germans, primarily Protestants and Catholics who were members of the party itself. That is my point. A majority of Christians were complicit. You can't deny or refute that. Kudos to those who resisted and even lost their lives trying to do the right thing. But overall, Christians were complicit.


The Nazi party itself did not even have many members actually.

"In the 1920s the Nazi party had less than 80,000 members.

1933: After Hitler was appointed chancellor in January, membership increased rapidly, reaching around 850,000 by the end of the year."

When Hitler took power it still has less than 1 million

Germany had a population of 66-67 million in 1933

The vast majority of Germans were not Nazi party members or party voters

And of the party itself it was more agnostic and Lutheran by member.

[Most Germans belonged to a Christian church, with the Nazi Party membership mirroring this demographic.
Protestant majority:
Protestants, especially Lutherans, were over-represented in the Nazi Party's membership and electorate, particularly in Northern Germany.
Catholic minority:
Catholics were under-represented in the party, as many voted for the Catholic Centre Party instead. However, some high-ranking Nazis, including Hitler himself, were nominal Catholics from Southern Germany…]

You are attacking Christians…because a criminal party had religious demographics that mirrored the country it was in..

Most Lutherans were members of The Confessing Church, the ones that were against everything the Nazi's stood for

Where is the evidence, other than verbal insincerity, backed by genuine action or commitment? How many Lutherans joined resistance fighters?

You need to look no further than the pacifist Dietrich Bonhoeffer. A Lutheran Pastor who participated in setting up the bomb that almost killed Hitler. The SS arrested in April 1943, Dietrich was held at several locations, starting in Berlin-Tegel prison and later transferred to the Gestapo prison on Prinz-Albert-Strasse. As the Allied forces advanced, he was moved to the Buchenwald concentration camp in February 1945 and finally to Flossenburg concentration camp. He was executed at Flossenburgn April 9, 1945.

And he should be commended for what he did. He is an example of what all Christians, and Germans for that matter, should have done. He is an exceptional Christian, who had integrity. That still doesn't override or excuse the fact that Germany was a predominantly Christian nation.

What are you smoking? You said that all Christians, or at least the vast majority in Germany were Nazi's. Now you are trying to adjust your argument.

Dude, you lost your argument badly. Take your beating and move on.
"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
BearlySpeaking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party.





You seem incapable of understanding that having some members of a religious group inside a political Party....does NOT make that Party a supporter of a specific religion...nor that religions adherents supporters of the said Party.

Catholics as a group were especially known as non-Nazi party supporters.

Catholics voted on mass for the Center party throughout the 1920s and 1930s

Catholic majority areas of Germany were in fact where the Nazi party got its lowest vote levels and saw the least support.

[Catholic bishops in Germany warned against the Nazis and some Bishops forbid party membership in the 1920s and 30s....
  • Specific bans: The bishop of Mainz explicitly excommunicated Catholic members of the Nazi Party in his diocese in 1930. The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano also stated that membership was "irreconcilable with the Catholic conscience".
  • Widespread condemnation: In 1931, the bishops of Paderborn and Freiburg issued similar warnings, while Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich called for a warning against Nazism because its views were "not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine"]


It's not just some members. It was an overwhelming percentage of Germans, primarily Protestants and Catholics who were members of the party itself. That is my point. A majority of Christians were complicit. You can't deny or refute that. Kudos to those who resisted and even lost their lives trying to do the right thing. But overall, Christians were complicit.


The Nazi party itself did not even have many members actually.

"In the 1920s the Nazi party had less than 80,000 members.

1933: After Hitler was appointed chancellor in January, membership increased rapidly, reaching around 850,000 by the end of the year."

When Hitler took power it still has less than 1 million

Germany had a population of 66-67 million in 1933

The vast majority of Germans were not Nazi party members or party voters

And of the party itself it was more agnostic and Lutheran by member.

[Most Germans belonged to a Christian church, with the Nazi Party membership mirroring this demographic.
Protestant majority:
Protestants, especially Lutherans, were over-represented in the Nazi Party's membership and electorate, particularly in Northern Germany.
Catholic minority:
Catholics were under-represented in the party, as many voted for the Catholic Centre Party instead. However, some high-ranking Nazis, including Hitler himself, were nominal Catholics from Southern Germany…]

You are attacking Christians…because a criminal party had religious demographics that mirrored the country it was in..

Most Lutherans were members of The Confessing Church, the ones that were against everything the Nazi's stood for

Where is the evidence, other than verbal insincerity, backed by genuine action or commitment? How many Lutherans joined resistance fighters?

You need to look no further than the pacifist Dietrich Bonhoeffer. A Lutheran Pastor who participated in setting up the bomb that almost killed Hitler. The SS arrested in April 1943, Dietrich was held at several locations, starting in Berlin-Tegel prison and later transferred to the Gestapo prison on Prinz-Albert-Strasse. As the Allied forces advanced, he was moved to the Buchenwald concentration camp in February 1945 and finally to Flossenburg concentration camp. He was executed at Flossenburgn April 9, 1945.



And he should be commended for what he did. He is an example of what all Christians, and Germans for that matter, should have done. He is an exceptional Christian, who had integrity. That still doesn't override or excuse the fact that Germany was a predominantly Christian nation.

The eugenics and racial theories that the Nazis adopted did not come from the Christian churches. They were formulated and advocated by Germany's atheist/agnostic scientists, doctors, and psychiatrists. Some of them ended up doing experiments in the concentration camps. Lifton's book "The Nazi Doctors" covered some of this history. The secular scientists and doctors were writing works on eugenics and racial theories long before the Nazis came to power, gaining traction in that community in the late 19th century. It was this source that the Nazis drew on for the racial and eugenics part of their ideology. The scientific community in Germany was awash in Social Darwinism, not Christianity.

Actually practicing Christians in Germany were estimated to be at most around 10% of the population, likely lower than that. Being listed as a member on a church membership roll in Europe in the 1930s was a pretty meaningless barometer of actual individual religious beliefs. Christianity had been noticeably declining in Europe for a while before the 1930s.
The Nazi racial and eugenics ideology developed originally in the secular scientific community, not the Christian churches.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySpeaking said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party.





You seem incapable of understanding that having some members of a religious group inside a political Party....does NOT make that Party a supporter of a specific religion...nor that religions adherents supporters of the said Party.

Catholics as a group were especially known as non-Nazi party supporters.

Catholics voted on mass for the Center party throughout the 1920s and 1930s

Catholic majority areas of Germany were in fact where the Nazi party got its lowest vote levels and saw the least support.

[Catholic bishops in Germany warned against the Nazis and some Bishops forbid party membership in the 1920s and 30s....
  • Specific bans: The bishop of Mainz explicitly excommunicated Catholic members of the Nazi Party in his diocese in 1930. The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano also stated that membership was "irreconcilable with the Catholic conscience".
  • Widespread condemnation: In 1931, the bishops of Paderborn and Freiburg issued similar warnings, while Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich called for a warning against Nazism because its views were "not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine"]


It's not just some members. It was an overwhelming percentage of Germans, primarily Protestants and Catholics who were members of the party itself. That is my point. A majority of Christians were complicit. You can't deny or refute that. Kudos to those who resisted and even lost their lives trying to do the right thing. But overall, Christians were complicit.


The Nazi party itself did not even have many members actually.

"In the 1920s the Nazi party had less than 80,000 members.

1933: After Hitler was appointed chancellor in January, membership increased rapidly, reaching around 850,000 by the end of the year."

When Hitler took power it still has less than 1 million

Germany had a population of 66-67 million in 1933

The vast majority of Germans were not Nazi party members or party voters

And of the party itself it was more agnostic and Lutheran by member.

[Most Germans belonged to a Christian church, with the Nazi Party membership mirroring this demographic.
Protestant majority:
Protestants, especially Lutherans, were over-represented in the Nazi Party's membership and electorate, particularly in Northern Germany.
Catholic minority:
Catholics were under-represented in the party, as many voted for the Catholic Centre Party instead. However, some high-ranking Nazis, including Hitler himself, were nominal Catholics from Southern Germany…]

You are attacking Christians…because a criminal party had religious demographics that mirrored the country it was in..

Most Lutherans were members of The Confessing Church, the ones that were against everything the Nazi's stood for

Where is the evidence, other than verbal insincerity, backed by genuine action or commitment? How many Lutherans joined resistance fighters?

You need to look no further than the pacifist Dietrich Bonhoeffer. A Lutheran Pastor who participated in setting up the bomb that almost killed Hitler. The SS arrested in April 1943, Dietrich was held at several locations, starting in Berlin-Tegel prison and later transferred to the Gestapo prison on Prinz-Albert-Strasse. As the Allied forces advanced, he was moved to the Buchenwald concentration camp in February 1945 and finally to Flossenburg concentration camp. He was executed at Flossenburgn April 9, 1945.



And he should be commended for what he did. He is an example of what all Christians, and Germans for that matter, should have done. He is an exceptional Christian, who had integrity. That still doesn't override or excuse the fact that Germany was a predominantly Christian nation.

The eugenics and racial theories that the Nazis adopted did not come from the Christian churches. They were formulated and advocated by Germany's atheist/agnostic scientists, doctors, and psychiatrists. Some of them ended up doing experiments in the concentration camps. Lifton's book "The Nazi Doctors" covered some of this history. The secular scientists and doctors were writing works on eugenics and racial theories long before the Nazis came to power, gaining traction in that community in the early 19th century. It was this source that the Nazis drew on for the racial and eugenics part of their ideology. The scientific community in Germany was awash in Social Darwinism, not Christianity.

Actually practicing Christians in Germany were estimated to be at most around 10% of the population, likely lower than that. Being listed as a member on a church membership roll in Europe in the 1930s was a pretty meaningless barometer of actual individual religious beliefs. Christianity had been noticeably declining in Europe for a while before the 1930s.
The Nazi racial and eugenics ideology developed originally in the secular scientific community, not the Christian churches.

So the Nazi's came from the scientific community? That would explain TexasScientist's deflections
"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
BearlySpeaking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

BearlySpeaking said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party.





You seem incapable of understanding that having some members of a religious group inside a political Party....does NOT make that Party a supporter of a specific religion...nor that religions adherents supporters of the said Party.

Catholics as a group were especially known as non-Nazi party supporters.

Catholics voted on mass for the Center party throughout the 1920s and 1930s

Catholic majority areas of Germany were in fact where the Nazi party got its lowest vote levels and saw the least support.

[Catholic bishops in Germany warned against the Nazis and some Bishops forbid party membership in the 1920s and 30s....
  • Specific bans: The bishop of Mainz explicitly excommunicated Catholic members of the Nazi Party in his diocese in 1930. The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano also stated that membership was "irreconcilable with the Catholic conscience".
  • Widespread condemnation: In 1931, the bishops of Paderborn and Freiburg issued similar warnings, while Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich called for a warning against Nazism because its views were "not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine"]


It's not just some members. It was an overwhelming percentage of Germans, primarily Protestants and Catholics who were members of the party itself. That is my point. A majority of Christians were complicit. You can't deny or refute that. Kudos to those who resisted and even lost their lives trying to do the right thing. But overall, Christians were complicit.


The Nazi party itself did not even have many members actually.

"In the 1920s the Nazi party had less than 80,000 members.

1933: After Hitler was appointed chancellor in January, membership increased rapidly, reaching around 850,000 by the end of the year."

When Hitler took power it still has less than 1 million

Germany had a population of 66-67 million in 1933

The vast majority of Germans were not Nazi party members or party voters

And of the party itself it was more agnostic and Lutheran by member.

[Most Germans belonged to a Christian church, with the Nazi Party membership mirroring this demographic.
Protestant majority:
Protestants, especially Lutherans, were over-represented in the Nazi Party's membership and electorate, particularly in Northern Germany.
Catholic minority:
Catholics were under-represented in the party, as many voted for the Catholic Centre Party instead. However, some high-ranking Nazis, including Hitler himself, were nominal Catholics from Southern Germany…]

You are attacking Christians…because a criminal party had religious demographics that mirrored the country it was in..

Most Lutherans were members of The Confessing Church, the ones that were against everything the Nazi's stood for

Where is the evidence, other than verbal insincerity, backed by genuine action or commitment? How many Lutherans joined resistance fighters?

You need to look no further than the pacifist Dietrich Bonhoeffer. A Lutheran Pastor who participated in setting up the bomb that almost killed Hitler. The SS arrested in April 1943, Dietrich was held at several locations, starting in Berlin-Tegel prison and later transferred to the Gestapo prison on Prinz-Albert-Strasse. As the Allied forces advanced, he was moved to the Buchenwald concentration camp in February 1945 and finally to Flossenburg concentration camp. He was executed at Flossenburgn April 9, 1945.



And he should be commended for what he did. He is an example of what all Christians, and Germans for that matter, should have done. He is an exceptional Christian, who had integrity. That still doesn't override or excuse the fact that Germany was a predominantly Christian nation.

The eugenics and racial theories that the Nazis adopted did not come from the Christian churches. They were formulated and advocated by Germany's atheist/agnostic scientists, doctors, and psychiatrists. Some of them ended up doing experiments in the concentration camps. Lifton's book "The Nazi Doctors" covered some of this history. The secular scientists and doctors were writing works on eugenics and racial theories long before the Nazis came to power, gaining traction in that community in the early 19th century. It was this source that the Nazis drew on for the racial and eugenics part of their ideology. The scientific community in Germany was awash in Social Darwinism, not Christianity.

Actually practicing Christians in Germany were estimated to be at most around 10% of the population, likely lower than that. Being listed as a member on a church membership roll in Europe in the 1930s was a pretty meaningless barometer of actual individual religious beliefs. Christianity had been noticeably declining in Europe for a while before the 1930s.
The Nazi racial and eugenics ideology developed originally in the secular scientific community, not the Christian churches.

So the Nazi's came from the scientific community? That would explain TexasScientist's deflections

The racial and eugenics ideology definitely came from the secular German scientific community. The scientific community (those in the universities or research institutes) were clearly overrepresented percentagewise in the Nazi Party membership compared to the percentage of the German public that were Nazi Party members.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

TexasScientist said:

historian said:

TexasScientist said:

historian said:

No. National socialists were far Left

The Nazi Party, officially the National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or NSDAP), was a far-LEFT political party in Germany active between 1920 and 1945 that created and supported the ideology of Nazism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party#:~:text=The%20Nazi%20Party%2C%20officially%20the,supported%20the%20ideology%20of%20Nazism.

FIFY
Wikipedia is notoriously wrong on many things. This is another example. It's a common mistake because most people don't know the truth. (They did get the German name correct). Most of us were taught incorrectly in school by Leftist teachers and professors repeating the lie that defies all facts and common sense. Nazi is a shortened form of National Socialist with Socialist being the key word in understanding who they were.

As noted above, the Nazis were no more Christian than the demographics of any other large group. Maybe some of them were nominally "Christian", probably those who called themselves "Christian" because they were baptized or attended church on Christmas and Easter. They were not "Christians" in the Christian sense, that is by God's definition. They were almost certainly the kind of "Christians" Christ said he did not know because they did not truly follow Him:

"Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?' And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!'" Matthew 7:21-23 NKJV

And none of this makes the Nazi Party a Christian organization. Nothing about Nazism follows Christian principles as evidenced by Christ's two greatest commandments:

"Jesus replied: 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments." Mathew 22:37-40 NIV

You are convincing no-one except yourself, and that's only because you are too arrogant and stubborn to see the truth. The only way one can truly understand God and come to Christ is through humility and repentance.


Ok so if we add socialist to MAGA, MAGA Socialist make you a lefty. It's generally accepted that Facism and Nazi ideals are far right in the political spectrum.

The rest of what you wrote is nonsense, and underscores the contradictions of so called scripture.

I would add that Christians in Nazi Germany clearly turned a blind eye to the atrocities they and their countrymen were commtting, and Christianity is deficient as a moral compass. The reason it is deficient is because its roots origninate in culutures that excuse violence and atrocities.


It might be generally accepted that fascism & Nazism are ideas of the right but it's a lie. There are a lot of lies that are generally accepted: Hunter's laptop, Russiagate, the ludicrous idea that socialism works, the climate cult (no, we are not destroying the planet), the trans cult (a man cannot become a woman, ever), "Trump is literally Hitler" (Hitler has been dead 80 years), every time a Leftist labels Trump or his supporters a fascist, and many more examples.

You continue making the false argument that the Nazis were Christian's. No they weren't. That lie has already been debunked but Leftists arrogantly stick with their lies no matter how absurd or how much contrary to the facts. Ironically, that is a common characteristic of genuine fascism which makes sense because it is an ideology of the Left.


To be honest, it's easy and naturally for people to turn a blind eye to evils in their midst. Whether it's the crimes of the Nazis, the crimes of the Bolsheviks (or any other communist regime), Apartheid, the crimes of antifa, the covid & vax hoaxes, abortion in demand, the trans cult, or many other example from history. It takes courage to do the right thing and stand up to evil. Few people have the courage of a Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Dietrich Boenhoefer, Rosa Parks, MLK, Raul Wallenberg, Charlie Kirk, etc. That courage is what makes them real heroes.

I will always take God's word over the contradictions of foolish philosophies and arrogance. Scripture, on the other hand, is always accurate 100% of the time and has repeatedly been proven so for centuries. Any fake contradictions are based upon misinterpretations, usually blatant, including taking passages out of context off red distorting usually clear meaning. In other words, lying about it. I will grant that some scriptures are more difficult to understand than others (apocalyptic literature, parables, poetry, etc) but they can be understood to some extent if approached honestly and with humility.



Quote:

It might be generally accepted that fascism & Nazism are ideas of the right but it's a lie. There are a lot of lies that are generally accepted: Hunter's laptop, Russiagate, the ludicrous idea that socialism works, the climate cult (no, we are not destroying the planet), the trans cult (a man cannot become a woman, ever), "Trump is literally Hitler" (Hitler has been dead 80 years), every time a Leftist labels Trump or his supporters a fascist, and many more examples.

It's not a lie, and its a generally accepted by scholars as being far to the right at the other end of the political spectrum. Communism and to a lesser extent socialism are to the far left. democracy, in its various forms, and capitalism fall between those extremes. The rest of your statement is a Red Herring and has nothing to do with facism, or socialism per se. To the extent they are true, false, or partially, they have no bearing on cultural and political ideaologies.

Quote:

You continue making the false argument that the Nazis were Christian's. No they weren't. That lie has already been debunked but Leftists arrogantly stick with their lies no matter how absurd or how much contrary to the facts. Ironically, that is a common characteristic of genuine fascism which makes sense because it is an ideology of the Left.

It's not a leftist or rightist issue. The fact is Germany was overwhelming made up of Christians. It was their country, their leader and their responsibility. Your persistent idea that facism is an ideology of the left, is not factual, and is not supported by any credible authorities, and is an example of how deep you're mired in your alternate reality. Facism is an authoritarian, anti-egalitarian political ideology at the far right of the political spectrum.
Quote:

To be honest, it's easy and naturally for people to turn a blind eye to evils in their midst. Whether it's the crimes of the Nazis, the crimes of the Bolsheviks (or any other communist regime), Apartheid, the crimes of antifa, the covid & vax hoaxes, abortion in demand, the trans cult, or many other example from history. It takes courage to do the right thing and stand up to evil. Few people have the courage of a Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Dietrich Boenhoefer, Rosa Parks, MLK, Raul Wallenberg, Charlie Kirk, etc. That courage is what makes them real heroes.

On this statement we're in general agreement, although I'm not sure what you mean by covid and vax hoaxes. Covid is real, it's not a hoax, and vaccines genarally are effective to various degrees, and are not hoaxes. Most of those poeple you listed, morally stood up against atrocities and wrong doing, possibly motivated by their religious beliefs. Why do you think Christians at large turned a blind eye to evil?

Quote:

I will always take God's word over the contradictions of foolish philosophies and arrogance. Scripture, on the other hand, is always accurate 100% of the time and has repeatedly been proven so for centuries. Any fake contradictions are based upon misinterpretations, usually blatant, including taking passages out of context off red distorting usually clear meaning. In other words, lying about it. I will grant that some scriptures are more difficult to understand than others (apocalyptic literature, parables, poetry, etc) but they can be understood to some extent if approached honestly and with humility.

The problem with this statement is that "God's word," be it the Judeo/Christian/Muslim gods, or some other god is clearly written, altered, amended, and compiled over time by various and numerous ancient and prmitive (by our standards) men with a theological/political agenda, in part as an effort to control, and bring meaning and order to their cultures. The Jewish tradition and origins of the god they claim to follow has origins, attributes, and characteristics drawn from ancient Midianite, Edomite, and Canaanite cultural gods that predate them. If by scripture, you are referring to the OT and NT, those documents are full of cantradictions and inaccuracies (many between surviving fragements of texts) that have been abundantly documented by scholars. And, those just happen to be the surviving iterations of those texts, among many nonsurviving versions and/or other alternate texts that were either destroyed, not preserved, or hidden away by the early Catholic Church in favor of their evolving theological doctrine. Even the Religion Department at Baylor acknowledges and teaches this. Fundamentalists often take Old Testament texts out of context to distort the meaning in order to shoe-horn support for a false idea or claim about what they want to believe. If you approach these more or less ancient texts with honesty and humility, you have to acknowledge them for what they are - compilations of ancient and primitive beliefs and lore that evolved, and have been handed down through time.
“It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.” ~ Upton Sinclair
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Actually, it is a popular myth started by Stalin and repeated by Leftists ever since. Big it's still a lie.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Babylon Bee had a great humorous video illustrating the similarities between the Leftists & the Nazis. Hint: ideologically they are mostly the same.

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySpeaking said:

Assassin said:

BearlySpeaking said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party.





You seem incapable of understanding that having some members of a religious group inside a political Party....does NOT make that Party a supporter of a specific religion...nor that religions adherents supporters of the said Party.

Catholics as a group were especially known as non-Nazi party supporters.

Catholics voted on mass for the Center party throughout the 1920s and 1930s

Catholic majority areas of Germany were in fact where the Nazi party got its lowest vote levels and saw the least support.

[Catholic bishops in Germany warned against the Nazis and some Bishops forbid party membership in the 1920s and 30s....
  • Specific bans: The bishop of Mainz explicitly excommunicated Catholic members of the Nazi Party in his diocese in 1930. The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano also stated that membership was "irreconcilable with the Catholic conscience".
  • Widespread condemnation: In 1931, the bishops of Paderborn and Freiburg issued similar warnings, while Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich called for a warning against Nazism because its views were "not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine"]


It's not just some members. It was an overwhelming percentage of Germans, primarily Protestants and Catholics who were members of the party itself. That is my point. A majority of Christians were complicit. You can't deny or refute that. Kudos to those who resisted and even lost their lives trying to do the right thing. But overall, Christians were complicit.


The Nazi party itself did not even have many members actually.

"In the 1920s the Nazi party had less than 80,000 members.

1933: After Hitler was appointed chancellor in January, membership increased rapidly, reaching around 850,000 by the end of the year."

When Hitler took power it still has less than 1 million

Germany had a population of 66-67 million in 1933

The vast majority of Germans were not Nazi party members or party voters

And of the party itself it was more agnostic and Lutheran by member.

[Most Germans belonged to a Christian church, with the Nazi Party membership mirroring this demographic.
Protestant majority:
Protestants, especially Lutherans, were over-represented in the Nazi Party's membership and electorate, particularly in Northern Germany.
Catholic minority:
Catholics were under-represented in the party, as many voted for the Catholic Centre Party instead. However, some high-ranking Nazis, including Hitler himself, were nominal Catholics from Southern Germany…]

You are attacking Christians…because a criminal party had religious demographics that mirrored the country it was in..

Most Lutherans were members of The Confessing Church, the ones that were against everything the Nazi's stood for

Where is the evidence, other than verbal insincerity, backed by genuine action or commitment? How many Lutherans joined resistance fighters?

You need to look no further than the pacifist Dietrich Bonhoeffer. A Lutheran Pastor who participated in setting up the bomb that almost killed Hitler. The SS arrested in April 1943, Dietrich was held at several locations, starting in Berlin-Tegel prison and later transferred to the Gestapo prison on Prinz-Albert-Strasse. As the Allied forces advanced, he was moved to the Buchenwald concentration camp in February 1945 and finally to Flossenburg concentration camp. He was executed at Flossenburgn April 9, 1945.



And he should be commended for what he did. He is an example of what all Christians, and Germans for that matter, should have done. He is an exceptional Christian, who had integrity. That still doesn't override or excuse the fact that Germany was a predominantly Christian nation.

The eugenics and racial theories that the Nazis adopted did not come from the Christian churches. They were formulated and advocated by Germany's atheist/agnostic scientists, doctors, and psychiatrists. Some of them ended up doing experiments in the concentration camps. Lifton's book "The Nazi Doctors" covered some of this history. The secular scientists and doctors were writing works on eugenics and racial theories long before the Nazis came to power, gaining traction in that community in the early 19th century. It was this source that the Nazis drew on for the racial and eugenics part of their ideology. The scientific community in Germany was awash in Social Darwinism, not Christianity.

Actually practicing Christians in Germany were estimated to be at most around 10% of the population, likely lower than that. Being listed as a member on a church membership roll in Europe in the 1930s was a pretty meaningless barometer of actual individual religious beliefs. Christianity had been noticeably declining in Europe for a while before the 1930s.
The Nazi racial and eugenics ideology developed originally in the secular scientific community, not the Christian churches.

So the Nazi's came from the scientific community? That would explain TexasScientist's deflections

The racial and eugenics ideology definitely came from the secular German scientific community. The scientific community (those in the universities or research institutes) were clearly overrepresented percentagewise in the Nazi Party membership compared to the percentage of the German public that were Nazi Party members.

Given Texas Scientist's posts here, now we know this is a deflection from his Nazi roots.

Seig Heil TS!
"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Actually, it is a popular myth started by Stalin and repeated by Leftists ever since. Big it's still a lie.

now that you mention it Stalin, Russia was (and still is) an overwhelmingly Christian country. Does that mean that Christian nationalism was responsible for communism, the repression of the East Bloc, the Gulag, and the 2022 invasion of Ukraine?

Hell, the whole damned world worships one kind of god or another, so obviously religion is the reason we have war, famine, pestilence, and grinding political oppression.

Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

historian said:

Actually, it is a popular myth started by Stalin and repeated by Leftists ever since. Big it's still a lie.

now that you mention it Stalin, Russia was (and still is) an overwhelmingly Christian country. Does that mean that Christian nationalism was responsible for communism, the repression of the East Bloc, the Gulag, and the 2022 invasion of Ukraine?

Hell, the whole damned world worships one kind of god or another, so obviously religion is the reason we have war, famine, pestilence, and grinding political oppression.

"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

TexasScientist said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

whiterock said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:

TexasScientist said:

Redbrickbear said:


And you blame Religion in general for atrocities committed by some religious groups...or statist groups claiming a religious mantel.

Humanism (that you are advocating for) is of course a form of secularism.

You are not dealing with the fact that secularism has a lot of blood on its hands. It could not even go a short time in Human history without committing mass atrocities.

You just want to fence off your particular favored form of secularism from any criticism

PS

We have gone over before that the Nazis were a secular movement and atheist at its core. The most religious groups in Germany did not even vote for the Nazis. (see Catholic opposition to Nazism) And the Nazi movement never even won a majority of votes by the German people.

The Nazis embrace of Darwinian evolution and racism was an example of it leaving behind traditional religion and building up a new secular evolutionary racism doctrine.





My point has been that an overwhelming perctentage (95%) in Germany was Christian, and German's stood by and let it happen, and the vote was 43.7%, which means a majority of that vote was made up of Christians, and it required a coalition that was backed by Christians.



So then Chinese Buddhists are reasonable for the Communists ruling China?

Orthodox Christians are responsible for the Bolsheviks?

In all 3 places (Germany, China, Russia) a radical minority party overthrew democracy and installed a vicious dictatorship with only one party being legal.

I think it's crossly unfair to lay that blame at the feat of Christians or Buddhists

Especially when these radically secularist/atheist parties in question immediately moved to suppress religion in various ways.

Then it is equally unfair to lay blame at the feet of atheists. The issue is that history is full of statist regimes that use power to compel population compliance, whether they use religion as a tool or view it as an obstacle.

Leftists cannot exist without ahistorical spin. Here's the actual score on internal political oppression:

National Socialists in Germany killed 17m.
Bolshevists in Russia killed minimum 3m with some estimates up to 20m.
Maoists in China killed 70m

That's just in the last century. All three regimes repressed religion, treated religious institutions as an explicit threat to power. And there's not an explicitly Christian regime which has anything remotely approaching that record.

Nothing kills on an industrial scale quite like Leftism


Except National Socialists were far right, and violently opposed to the Soviet communism.

You conveniently ignore that most of the members of the Nazi party were Christians. Why didn't they do anything significantly to oppose their leader?






1. And yet the Nat. Socialist ideology was in many ways very close to Soviet Communism in its economic views and goals.


2. You refuse to acknowledge that in any super majority Christian country.....of course all parties there will have a majority of members that are Christian (at least on paper)

The Nazi party was still NOT a Christian movement, not a Christian party, and not one that confessing Catholics in Germany were interested in supporting.

[Nazi party had a long-term goal of undermining and ultimately eliminating Christianity in favor of a new Nazi ideology. Nazi leaders saw Christian values as a direct ideological threat to their totalitarian and racial doctrines.]

The Nazi party was probably the least Christian party in Germany other than the KPD (German Communist Party)

The majority of the Communist Party of China in the 1940s was probably Buddhist or Confucian/Chinese folk religious. Does not mean the Chinese Communist Party was a Buddhist or Confucian movement

That's not true. There were numerous Catholics and others who were members of the Nazi party.





You seem incapable of understanding that having some members of a religious group inside a political Party....does NOT make that Party a supporter of a specific religion...nor that religions adherents supporters of the said Party.

Catholics as a group were especially known as non-Nazi party supporters.

Catholics voted on mass for the Center party throughout the 1920s and 1930s

Catholic majority areas of Germany were in fact where the Nazi party got its lowest vote levels and saw the least support.

[Catholic bishops in Germany warned against the Nazis and some Bishops forbid party membership in the 1920s and 30s....
  • Specific bans: The bishop of Mainz explicitly excommunicated Catholic members of the Nazi Party in his diocese in 1930. The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano also stated that membership was "irreconcilable with the Catholic conscience".
  • Widespread condemnation: In 1931, the bishops of Paderborn and Freiburg issued similar warnings, while Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich called for a warning against Nazism because its views were "not reconcilable with Catholic doctrine"]


It's not just some members. It was an overwhelming percentage of Germans, primarily Protestants and Catholics who were members of the party itself. That is my point. A majority of Christians were complicit. You can't deny or refute that. Kudos to those who resisted and even lost their lives trying to do the right thing. But overall, Christians were complicit.


The Nazi party itself did not even have many members actually.

"In the 1920s the Nazi party had less than 80,000 members.

1933: After Hitler was appointed chancellor in January, membership increased rapidly, reaching around 850,000 by the end of the year."

When Hitler took power it still has less than 1 million

Germany had a population of 66-67 million in 1933

The vast majority of Germans were not Nazi party members or party voters

And of the party itself it was more agnostic and Lutheran by member.

[Most Germans belonged to a Christian church, with the Nazi Party membership mirroring this demographic.
Protestant majority:
Protestants, especially Lutherans, were over-represented in the Nazi Party's membership and electorate, particularly in Northern Germany.
Catholic minority:
Catholics were under-represented in the party, as many voted for the Catholic Centre Party instead. However, some high-ranking Nazis, including Hitler himself, were nominal Catholics from Southern Germany…]

You are attacking Christians…because a criminal party had religious demographics that mirrored the country it was in..

Most Lutherans were members of The Confessing Church, the ones that were against everything the Nazi's stood for

Where is the evidence, other than verbal insincerity, backed by genuine action or commitment? How many Lutherans joined resistance fighters?

You need to look no further than the pacifist Dietrich Bonhoeffer. A Lutheran Pastor who participated in setting up the bomb that almost killed Hitler. The SS arrested in April 1943, Dietrich was held at several locations, starting in Berlin-Tegel prison and later transferred to the Gestapo prison on Prinz-Albert-Strasse. As the Allied forces advanced, he was moved to the Buchenwald concentration camp in February 1945 and finally to Flossenburg concentration camp. He was executed at Flossenburgn April 9, 1945.



And he should be commended for what he did. He is an example of what all Christians, and Germans for that matter, should have done. He is an exceptional Christian, who had integrity. That still doesn't override or excuse the fact that Germany was a predominantly Christian nation.


And China was a predominantly Buddhist nation

Yet Buddhism is not responsible for Mao Zedong or the Communists and their crimes
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

historian said:

Actually, it is a popular myth started by Stalin and repeated by Leftists ever since. Big it's still a lie.

now that you mention it Stalin, Russia was (and still is) an overwhelmingly Christian country. Does that mean that Christian nationalism was responsible for communism, the repression of the East Bloc, the Gulag, and the 2022 invasion of Ukraine?

Hell, the whole damned world worships one kind of god or another, so obviously religion is the reason we have war, famine, pestilence, and grinding political oppression.




At this point he is just trolling….and trying to derail a topic specific thread with general anti-religion or anti-Christian arguments
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.