The FEMA official who was just fired for telling workers to avoid homes impacted by the hurricanes in Florida if they had Trump signs says that it was not "isolated" and that FEMA workers were instructed to do it in the Carolinas too. pic.twitter.com/BpBdZFSSPR
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 12, 2024
The chit is about to hit the wind turbine!LIB,MR BEARS said:The FEMA official who was just fired for telling workers to avoid homes impacted by the hurricanes in Florida if they had Trump signs says that it was not "isolated" and that FEMA workers were instructed to do it in the Carolinas too. pic.twitter.com/BpBdZFSSPR
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 12, 2024
Marn'i not falling on the sword. Gonna be big problems for FEMA with the new administration coming in.LIB,MR BEARS said:The FEMA official who was just fired for telling workers to avoid homes impacted by the hurricanes in Florida if they had Trump signs says that it was not "isolated" and that FEMA workers were instructed to do it in the Carolinas too. pic.twitter.com/BpBdZFSSPR
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 12, 2024
BearFan33 said:Marn'i not falling on the sword. Gonna be big problems for FEMA with the new administration coming in.LIB,MR BEARS said:The FEMA official who was just fired for telling workers to avoid homes impacted by the hurricanes in Florida if they had Trump signs says that it was not "isolated" and that FEMA workers were instructed to do it in the Carolinas too. pic.twitter.com/BpBdZFSSPR
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 12, 2024
Quote:
Washington told DailyMail.com she is seeking an attorney and is 'at risk' as a result of the backlash she's received. 'I have information that proves FEMA is lying,' she said.
In a podcast appearance last night, she went further claiming more FEMA employees are guilty of the same bias, but that she is the only one being hung out to dry.
The FEMA boss who was fired after ordering volunteers not to approach homes displaying Trump signs in Florida after Hurricane Milton has insisted her edict 'was not isolated' and also happened in North Carolina.
Speaking out for the first time since she was fired, Marn'i Washington accused the Federal Emergency Management Agency of 'lying' about the scandal, and making her the scapegoat of a wider practice.
The fired FEMA worker is going down fighting and saying it’s agency policy to skip Trump supporter’s homes, she didn’t come up with it on her own. This should be a gigantic story. https://t.co/l71wziqjDF
— Karol Markowicz (@karol) November 12, 2024
Jacques Strap said:BearFan33 said:Marn'i not falling on the sword. Gonna be big problems for FEMA with the new administration coming in.LIB,MR BEARS said:The FEMA official who was just fired for telling workers to avoid homes impacted by the hurricanes in Florida if they had Trump signs says that it was not "isolated" and that FEMA workers were instructed to do it in the Carolinas too. pic.twitter.com/BpBdZFSSPR
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 12, 2024Quote:
Washington told DailyMail.com she is seeking an attorney and is 'at risk' as a result of the backlash she's received. 'I have information that proves FEMA is lying,' she said.
In a podcast appearance last night, she went further claiming more FEMA employees are guilty of the same bias, but that she is the only one being hung out to dry.
The FEMA boss who was fired after ordering volunteers not to approach homes displaying Trump signs in Florida after Hurricane Milton has insisted her edict 'was not isolated' and also happened in North Carolina.
Speaking out for the first time since she was fired, Marn'i Washington accused the Federal Emergency Management Agency of 'lying' about the scandal, and making her the scapegoat of a wider practice.The fired FEMA worker is going down fighting and saying it’s agency policy to skip Trump supporter’s homes, she didn’t come up with it on her own. This should be a gigantic story. https://t.co/l71wziqjDF
— Karol Markowicz (@karol) November 12, 2024
FEMA gave billions to house illegals and denied disaster help to Trump supporters.
— Jeff Carlson (@themarketswork) November 12, 2024
Gut it.
Dems would be better served to have their investigation and determination now rather than waiting until Trump's team is in place.BearFan33 said:
Judging from this lady's comments, FEMA higher ups are going to claim that those mean trump supporters threatened FEMA workers and so they made a blanket policy to not endanger their employees by helping people that looked scary (even thought that is their job). That may have worked with the Biden administration but is not going to work with the incoming administration.
It's a lame excuse on the surface and is probably a lie at its core.
Sam Lowry said:Sure. All I'm saying is we don't need a political purge.LIB,MR BEARS said:do you think it's worth investigating whether or not this was a one time occurrence and following the evidence wherever it leads?Sam Lowry said:
It's not nothing! I'm just saying we don't need an ideological purge of the whole agency like some are advocating.
Porteroso said:
The fired employee says it was actually widespread. She says they encountered a lot of conflict at houses with Trump signs, and basically their policy is avoidance. Says it is not just the 1 team, that it is everywhere.
.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Read again, and with enough comprehension you will see that I am not defending it, but saying it is an issue that should be fixed. Maybe go slowly?Redbrickbear said:I'm shocked to see you on here defending a Federal government bureaucracy discriminating against American citizens using flimsy excuses about "safety".Porteroso said:
The fired employee says it was actually widespread. She says they encountered a lot of conflict at houses with Trump signs, and basically their policy is avoidance. Says it is not just the 1 team, that it is everywhere.
I mean I'm not actually shocked but still….lol
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Do you have evidence for the claim that TrumpPorteroso said:It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that. Skipping homes with political signs is a clear violation of many rights.
FEMA will have to accept that they might indeed encounter conflict with one political party more than the other, and that it might slow their aid down. They will just have to live with that.
Porteroso said:It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,
maybe a woman made the claim and it is therefore accepted as fact.Redbrickbear said:Porteroso said:It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,
Where is your proof they encountered "a lot of conflict" at homes with Trump signs?
Are we talking 1 incident with 1 guy that was then used to discriminate against all Trump voters in the region that needed help?
Interesting that you just take them at their word
Porteroso said:Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that.
Wangchung said:Do you have evidence for the claim that TrumpPorteroso said:It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that. Skipping homes with political signs is a clear violation of many rights.
FEMA will have to accept that they might indeed encounter conflict with one political party more than the other, and that it might slow their aid down. They will just have to live with that.
supporters were causing them problems? Because to the rest of us it sounds just like the claim that white supremacy is the number one threat to the safety of Americans.
Redbrickbear said:Porteroso said:It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,
Where is your proof they encountered "a lot of conflict" at homes with Trump signs?
Are we talking 1 incident with 1 guy that was then used to discriminate against all Trump voters in the region that needed help?
Interesting that you just take them at their word
Redbrickbear said:Porteroso said:Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that.
Also, interesting that you start calling these North Carolina residents "*******s"
Maybe have some compassion for people who have just been through a major trauma?
Guys and gals who just saw there homes and lives destroyed....maybe lost family members or dear friends who died.
Maybe their businesses were ruined and finances crushed
[-The catastrophic flooding and destruction caused by Hurricane Helene in western North Carolina likely caused at least a record $53 billion in damages and recovery needs, Gov. Roy Cooper's administration said Wednesday.
-More than 100,000 homes were damaged or destroyed by Hurricane Helene across Western North Carolina. That includes apartment buildings, single family homes and trailers across the region, and this impacts an estimated 200,000+ people.
-At least 227 people died as a result of Hurricane Helene, with the majority of the deaths occurring in North Carolina]
.
These people had just been through hell....and here you are calling them names.
Maybe you are the *******....
So no evidence. Got it.Porteroso said:Wangchung said:Do you have evidence for the claim that TrumpPorteroso said:It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that. Skipping homes with political signs is a clear violation of many rights.
FEMA will have to accept that they might indeed encounter conflict with one political party more than the other, and that it might slow their aid down. They will just have to live with that.
supporters were causing them problems? Because to the rest of us it sounds just like the claim that white supremacy is the number one threat to the safety of Americans.
Ask FEMA or read the link i posted. I think Fox interviewed her, and I'm paraphrasing what was reported.
Wangchung said:So no evidence. Got it.Porteroso said:Wangchung said:Do you have evidence for the claim that TrumpPorteroso said:It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that. Skipping homes with political signs is a clear violation of many rights.
FEMA will have to accept that they might indeed encounter conflict with one political party more than the other, and that it might slow their aid down. They will just have to live with that.
supporters were causing them problems? Because to the rest of us it sounds just like the claim that white supremacy is the number one threat to the safety of Americans.
Ask FEMA or read the link i posted. I think Fox interviewed her, and I'm paraphrasing what was reported.
Porteroso said:Redbrickbear said:Porteroso said:Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that.
Also, interesting that you start calling these North Carolina residents "*******s"
Maybe have some compassion for people who have just been through a major trauma?
Guys and gals who just saw there homes and lives destroyed....maybe lost family members or dear friends who died.
Maybe their businesses were ruined and finances crushed
[-The catastrophic flooding and destruction caused by Hurricane Helene in western North Carolina likely caused at least a record $53 billion in damages and recovery needs, Gov. Roy Cooper's administration said Wednesday.
-More than 100,000 homes were damaged or destroyed by Hurricane Helene across Western North Carolina. That includes apartment buildings, single family homes and trailers across the region, and this impacts an estimated 200,000+ people.
-At least 227 people died as a result of Hurricane Helene, with the majority of the deaths occurring in North Carolina]
.
These people had just been through hell....and here you are calling them names.
Maybe you are the *******....
No sympathy.
Porteroso said:Redbrickbear said:Porteroso said:It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,
Where is your proof they encountered "a lot of conflict" at homes with Trump signs?
Are we talking 1 incident with 1 guy that was then used to discriminate against all Trump voters in the region that needed help?
Interesting that you just take them at their word
It seems more than believable that MAGAs would want conflict with federal employees on their doorstep. Does it not to you?
Redbrickbear said:Porteroso said:Redbrickbear said:Porteroso said:It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,
Where is your proof they encountered "a lot of conflict" at homes with Trump signs?
Are we talking 1 incident with 1 guy that was then used to discriminate against all Trump voters in the region that needed help?
Interesting that you just take them at their word
It seems more than believable that MAGAs would want conflict with federal employees on their doorstep. Does it not to you?
No it does not
But we can tell you love to stereotype according to your own bias and bigotry
I think a poor area in NC or a poor urban area in New Orleans are going to both have a lot of hurt and stressed out people in a massive disaster like this.
Just because one group might vote Red and the other Blue does not tell us much about how they would react to a Federal Employee or that if they did react in a less than polite manner that politics has anything to do with it.
Porteroso said:maga Repubs the party of blowing the whole thing up?Redbrickbear said:Porteroso said:Redbrickbear said:Porteroso said:It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.Wangchung said:Of course you wouldn't.Sam Lowry said:The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.Wangchung said:TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...Sam Lowry said:TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.Wangchung said:
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,
Where is your proof they encountered "a lot of conflict" at homes with Trump signs?
Are we talking 1 incident with 1 guy that was then used to discriminate against all Trump voters in the region that needed help?
Interesting that you just take them at their word
It seems more than believable that MAGAs would want conflict with federal employees on their doorstep. Does it not to you?
No it does not
But we can tell you love to stereotype according to your own bias and bigotry
I think a poor area in NC or a poor urban area in New Orleans are going to both have a lot of hurt and stressed out people in a massive disaster like this.
Just because one group might vote Red and the other Blue does not tell us much about how they would react to a Federal Employee or that if they did react in a less than polite manner that politics has anything to do with it.
Look, people on both sides are extremely emotional right now. You all need some time to settle down. I post on another forum that is largely a progressive echo chamber, and their posting is similar to yours, just inverse politics. No point in pretending we can have a rational discussion right now.